Medion Erazer Beast X40回顾：配备RTX 4090的游戏笔记本

Name: Medion Erazer Beast X40
Brand: Medion

大修。 走大路，不走小路：通过酷睿i9-13900HX和GeForce RTX 4090笔记本电脑，Medion给这款笔记本提供了目前最新和最强大的硬件。该设备还具有快速的16:10屏幕（2,560 x 1,600），机械键盘和相当不错的电池寿命。

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 03/24/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake Thunderbolt Windows

尽管它属于游戏笔记本电脑的范畴，但Erazer Beast X40也被设想用于其他非常苛刻的使用场景。必要的计算性能是由Raptor Lake CPU和Ada Lovelace GPU提供的。与它的前辈相比，这款笔记本电脑已经得到了重大改造：Medion为其提供了新的屏幕宽高比（16:10而不是16:9），一个可选水冷的冷却系统，以及一个机械键盘。

X40基于同方的裸机（GM7PX9N），与用于XMG Neo 17的裸机基本相同。 XMG Neo 17.它的竞争对手是 MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI, Alienware x17 R2 P48E, Razer Blade 16 (2023年初)和华硕ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY.

Test device courtesy of Medion

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Medion Erazer Beast X40 (Erazer Series)

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.4 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 160 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 2040 MHz, Memory: 2375 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.2849, Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-4800, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Display

17.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 178 PPI, BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, G-Sync, glossy: no, 240 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)

Storage

Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R, 1024 GB

, 1884 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 1x combo audio jack, 1x mic-in, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0

Networking

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 33 x 383 x 272

Battery

99.8 Wh, 6450 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Mechanical, Keyboard Light: yes, McAfee LiveSafe (Trial), Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.88 kg, Power Supply: 986 g

Price

4499 Euro

Links

Medion homepage
Medion notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
88.4 %	03/2023	Medion Erazer Beast X40 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2.9 kg	33 mm	17.00"	2560x1600
89 %	02/2023	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	3.5 kg	23 mm	17.30"	3840x2160
91.2 %	02/2023	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	21.99 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87.6 %	09/2022	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	27 mm	17.00"	2560x1600
89.2 %	05/2022	Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3.1 kg	20.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
86.6 %	02/2023	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	3.1 kg	30.8 mm	18.00"	2560x1600

外壳 - Erazer有一个金属底盘

Erazer Beast X40摒弃了响亮和华丽的外观，而采用了低调的设计，在专业环境中不会引人注目。与它的前辈一样，X40使用黑色金属底盘，并进行了磨砂处理。底座部分覆盖着一层抓地力强的橡胶涂层。键盘背光（RGB）以及后部排气口上方的两个完全可配置的LED条（RGB）为笔记本电脑提供了一抹色彩。电池是用螺丝钉固定的，而不是用胶水粘住的，一旦取下底盖，就可以接触到其余的内部零件。

在我们的评测单元上，我们没有注意到任何做工问题。机箱中的缝隙很好，也很紧密，制造过程中没有留下多余的材料。几乎不可能扭动底座部分。盖子可以稍微弯曲，但弯曲的程度是完全可以接受的。铰链将显示屏牢牢地固定在原处，并允许屏幕向后折叠，折叠的角度可达140度左右。笔记本电脑的盖子不能用一只手打开。

Medion Erazer Beast X40是我们比较中最紧凑的设备之一，在重量方面处于中间位置。

尺寸比较

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Alienware x17 R2 P48E MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Medion Erazer Beast X40 SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 DIN A4 ❌

规格--野兽的Thunderbolt 4

Erazer有三个USB-A端口（2个USB 3.2 Gen 1，1个USB 3.2 Gen 2）和一个USB-C端口（Thunderbolt 4）。后者不支持Power Delivery，但能够输出DisplayPort信号。笔记本电脑总共有两个视频输出（HDMI 2.1，DP），两个音频插孔（耳机和麦克风输入），一个千兆以太网端口和一个肯辛顿插槽。在后面，你还会发现用于可选的水冷解决方案的连接器。

在左边：Kensington插槽，USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A)，麦克风输入，组合式音频插孔

背面：2个水冷接口，Thunderbolt 4（USB-C；DisplayPort），HDMI 2.1，千兆以太网，电源接口。

SD卡阅读器

SD读卡器是一个中等速度的模型，与我们的AV Pro microSD 128 GB V60参考卡一起使用，在传输250张每张约5MB的JPEG图像时，设法达到77MB/s的速度，在复制大块数据时达到86MB/s。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV Pro V60)	182.9 MB/s +138%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	125 MB/s +62%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)	98.4 MB/s +28%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	83.5 MB/s +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	77 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	69 MB/s -10%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV Pro V60)	220.6 MB/s +157%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	207.6 MB/s +141%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)	121.3 MB/s +41%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	86.2 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	86 MB/s

连接性

在最佳条件下（周围没有其他Wi-Fi设备，笔记本电脑和服务器PC之间距离较短），Erazer通过Wi-Fi提供了出色的传输速率，因为Medion决定采用英特尔AX211 Wi-Fi 6E模块。有线网络连接由Realtek RTL8125千兆以太网芯片处理，其速度高达2.5Gbit/s。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1582 (1517^min, 1518.74^P1 - 1636^max) MBit/s +16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1466 (748^min - 1542^max) MBit/s +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1364 (1079^min - 1473^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1793, n=153, last 2 years)	1272 MBit/s -7%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1861, n=186)	1243 MBit/s -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1155 (495^min - 1441^max) MBit/s -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608	936 (898^min - 971^max) MBit/s -31%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1890 (1843^min - 1936^max) MBit/s +20%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1578 (1516^min - 1627^max) MBit/s
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1545 (1508^min, 1510.9^P1 - 1569^max) MBit/s -2%
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=159, last 2 years)	1403 MBit/s -11%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=186)	1394 MBit/s -12%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1328 (1093^min - 1448^max) MBit/s -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608	967 (949^min - 978^max) MBit/s -39%

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1371 (1036-1505)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1494 (1283-1580)

Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1364 (1079-1473)

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1582 (1517-1636)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1155 (495-1441)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø936 (898-971)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1441 (748-1542)

Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1578 (1516-1627)

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1545 (1508-1569)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1327 (1093-1448)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø966 (949-978)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1890 (1843-1936)

网络摄像头

210万像素的网络摄像头能以1,920 x 1,080的最大分辨率捕捉图像。它在色彩准确性方面有所欠缺：摄像头产生的色彩与参考色有很大偏差。网络摄像头上没有机械的隐私快门。

ColorChecker Medion Erazer Beast X40: 8.69 ∆E min: 3.5 - max: 14.3 ∆E

辅料

笔记本电脑除了通常的文件和电源适配器外，没有其他附件。Medion提供了一个可选的外部水冷却解决方案，价格约为250欧元（270美元），该公司也提供给我们进行测试。

这个小型冷却装置相当容易使用：只需将蒸馏水注入其中，连接电缆和管道，然后将其打开。笔记本电脑和外部冷却装置通过蓝牙相互通信，连接会自动建立。笔记本电脑的充电器为X40和冷却装置提供电源。水管是用磁力固定的--不需要紧固螺丝。然而，当你断开水管连接时，可能会有几滴水漏出。

维护

要拆下底盖，你需要解开底面的所有螺丝，以及背面水冷接头旁边的另外两个螺丝。之后，底盖可以通过排气口急速拉开。卸下盖子可以让你接触到内存插槽（两个都在使用）、两个PCIe 4.0固态硬盘、Wi-Fi模块、风扇、BIOS电池和可充电电池。

担保

Medion为Erazer提供两年的保修。有升级选项，但必须在Medion的网上商店与笔记本电脑一起购买。购买笔记本电脑后，你不能升级或延长保修期。将保修期延长一年需要花费近200欧元（216美元）。

输入设备 - 带Cherry MX开关的机械键盘

键盘

机械键盘通常以其精确的输入和反馈以及优质的打字感觉而闻名--这在X40的键盘上也不例外。它的Cherry MX开关提供了一个适度的行程和一个听觉和触觉的启动点。当你打字时，键盘不会弯曲。有两个功能键可以让你把每个键的RGB照明调整到四个亮度级别中的一个。总的来说，Erazer Beast X40有一个全方位的奇妙键盘。

触摸板

尺寸约为15.5 x 10厘米（6.1 x 3.9"），多点触控点击板有一个光滑的表面，让你的手指轻松滑过。它提供了一个短的行程和一个明显的点击点。触摸板的上角有状态指示灯。点击左边的LED灯将启用或禁用整个触摸板，而右边的LED灯只用于打开或关闭触摸板的右半部分。

显示屏 - QHD+，长宽比为16:10

17英寸亚光IPS显示屏（2,560 x 1,440）具有16:10的长宽比，并以足够的亮度、快速响应时间、高刷新率（240Hz）和没有PWM闪烁而脱颖而出。但是它的对比度没有达到人们认为的好水平（>1,000:1）。

该面板支持G-Sync，这项技术有助于显示器的刷新率动态地适应GPU输出的帧率。这旨在提供更流畅的观看体验，特别是在游戏时。


377 cd/m²	357 cd/m²	372 cd/m²
387 cd/m²	384 cd/m²	368 cd/m²
398 cd/m²	383 cd/m²	369 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE NE170QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 398 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 377.2 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 384 cd/m²
Contrast: 853:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.05 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.74
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
69.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.017

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Medion Erazer Beast X40 BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.30	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 BOE0A99, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00	Alienware x17 R2 P48E AU Optronics B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NE180QDM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00
Display		24%	24%	0%	10%	21%
Display P3 Coverage	68.6	94.9 38%	98.5 44%	69 1%	79.2 15%	97.2 42%
sRGB Coverage	99.8	99.9 0%	100 0%	99.8 0%	99.8 0%	99.9 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	69.4	92.4 33%	89.7 29%	69.6 0%	79.6 15%	84.9 22%
Response Times		-248%	-9%	12%	-17%	19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	11.3 ?(5.4, 5.9)	38.4 ?(13.6, 24.8, n) -240%	6.6 ?(3.4, 3.2) 42%	10.8 ?(5.1, 5.7) 4%	12.4 ?(6.4, 6) -10%	5.41 ?(2.57, 2.84) 52%
Response Time Black / White *	7.5 ?(3.3, 4.2)	26.6 ?(9.2, 17.4, n) -255%	12 ?(6.8, 5.2) -60%	6.1 ?(2.5, 3.6) 19%	9.2 ?(5.2, 4) -23%	8.62 ?(3.68, 4.94, n) -15%
PWM Frequency		2380 ?(100)
Screen		78886%	-6%	11%	-22%	-92%
Brightness middle	384	606 58%	456.8 19%	415 8%	365.4 -5%	490 28%
Brightness	377	602 60%	437 16%	399 6%	344 -9%	468 24%
Brightness Distribution	90	93 3%	83 -8%	90 0%	85 -6%	86 -4%
Black Level *	0.45	0.0001 100%	0.35 22%	0.43 4%	0.29 36%	0.54 -20%
Contrast	853	6060000 710334%	1305 53%	965 13%	1260 48%	907 6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.05	4.8 -134%	3.7 -80%	1.44 30%	3.17 -55%	4.97 -142%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.64	8.2 -125%	6.42 -76%	2.33 36%	7.69 -111%	11.02 -203%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.74	1.8 -143%	0.66 11%	0.89 -20%	0.51 31%	2.97 -301%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.3	6.5 -183%	2.6 -13%	1.8 22%	5.3 -130%	7.2 -213%
Gamma	2.017 ^109%	2.63 ^84%	2.3 ^96%	2.132 ^103%	2.18 ^101%	2.161 ^102%
CCT	6546 ^99%	6596 ^99%	6108 ^106%	6327 ^103%	5879 ^111%	6515 ^100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		26221% / 50682%	3% / -0%	8% / 9%	-10% / -15%	-17% / -52%

* ... smaller is better

这款显示器在开箱后就已经有了很好的色彩还原能力。它的平均色差大约为2，明显低于被认为是好的阈值（Delta E < 3）。校准显示器后，平均色差降至0.74，并使灰度更加平衡。该面板能够覆盖整个sRGB色彩空间，但不能覆盖AdobeRGB和DCI-P3。一些竞争性笔记本电脑上的显示屏在色彩覆盖方面表现更好。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
7.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.3 ms rise
7.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.4 ms rise
11.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

IPS面板具有宽广的视角，从任何位置都可以轻松阅读。只要太阳不是太亮，该显示屏在户外肯定是可用的。

表现 - 猛禽湖与阿达-洛夫莱斯的结合

尽管它的设计主要是考虑到QHD+游戏，但Erazer Beast X40在视频编辑和渲染等应用中也有不错的表现。所需的计算能力由Raptor Lake和Ada Lovelace提供。本评论中的X40型号可以以大约4500欧元（4856美元）的价格买到。但Medion还提供了一个略低规格的配置（RTX 4080和1TB SSD；其他方面相同），价格为3500欧元（3777美元）。

测试条件

有三种制造商指定的性能模式：办公室、平衡和涡轮。我们使用Turbo模式进行基准测试，使用Office模式进行电池寿命测试，并在两种情况下都启用了Nvidia Optimus。完成这些测试后，我们在启用dGPU模式和连接外部水冷装置的情况下运行了更多基准测试。你可以在对比表中找到这些额外测试的结果，但在评级时不考虑这些结果。

用户可以使用电源按钮旁边的一个专用按钮在三种模式之间进行切换。一个LED状态指示灯显示当前启用的模式。也可以使用预装的控制中心软件创建定制的配置文件。例如，你可以指定CPU的功率限制、GPU的TGP、温度限制等等。

注意：我们在控制中心软件中使用的是英文用户界面，因为德文翻译有一些问题。该软件可以让你在两种语言之间切换。

	涡轮模式	平衡模式	办公模式
功率限制1	160瓦	160瓦	160瓦
功率限制2	160瓦	160瓦	160瓦

处理器

Core i9-13900HX （Raptor Lake）由八个性能核心（超线程，2.2至5.4 GHz）和十六个效率核心（无超线程，1.6至3.9 GHz）组成，总共有40个逻辑核心。获得的基准测试结果略高于CPU能够产生的平均水平。

在插上Erazer Beast X40的情况下，其CPU在高至最大的时钟速度下运行Cinebench R15。在电池供电的情况下，单线程性能只略微降低（得分：228），而多线程性能则受到了相当大的打击（得分：1154）。循环运行Cinebench 15表明，在主电源上，CPU能够以高提升速度持续运行。

使用水冷装置并没有带来任何性能上的大幅提升。尽管如此，在持续的多线程负载下，CPU的性能更加稳定（CB15循环），CPU的平均温度下降了约5℃（9℉）。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4532 (4437.05-4828.15)

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4980 (4889.98-5226.71)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4512 (4463.29-4528.99)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2230 (2203.37-2292.39)

Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2889 (2849.61-2917.79)

Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX; dGPU, Cooling: Ø4680 (4646.3-4744.4)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø4735 (4684.94-4780.69)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	84.9 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	83.6 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	82.3 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	81 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX	77.7 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	72.9 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	60.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	58.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	47.6 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	33277 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	31572 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	30932 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	30886 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (24270 - 32623, n=22)	28225 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	26736 (22394.1^min - 26736.1^max) Points -14%
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=233, last 2 years)	19629 Points -37%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	18870 (18654.1^min - 18869.7^max) Points -39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	14152 Points -54%
Single Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	2140 Points +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	2100 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	2083 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1867 - 2105, n=19)	2044 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2035 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	2029 Points 0%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	1905 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=231, last 2 years)	1818 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1557 Points -23%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	12648 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	12073 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	11788 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	11780 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9152 - 12541, n=20)	10766 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	8697 Points -26%
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=231, last 2 years)	7460 Points -37%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	7169 Points -39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5549 Points -53%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	824 Points +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	803 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	793 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (722 - 810, n=20)	784 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	782 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	742 Points -5%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	727 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=231, last 2 years)	700 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	605 Points -23%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	5227 (4889.98^min - 5226.71^max) Points +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	4828 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	4823 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	4744 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	4781 (4684.94^min - 4780.69^max) Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	4529 (4463.29^min - 4528.99^max) Points -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (3913 - 4970, n=21)	4522 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=236, last 2 years)	3108 Points -36%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	2918 (2849.61^min - 2917.79^max) Points -40%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2296 Points -52%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	312 Points +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	300 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	297 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	295 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	278 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (247 - 304, n=21)	292 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	274 Points -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	272 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=235, last 2 years)	269 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	248 Points -16%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	216 Seconds * -108%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years)	198.9 Seconds * -91%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	173.6 Seconds * -67%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (101 - 153, n=21)	117.9 Seconds * -13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	114 Seconds * -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	104 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	103 Seconds * +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	102 Seconds * +2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	100 Seconds * +4%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	127295 MIPS +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	123833 MIPS +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	121921 MIPS
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	121631 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (90675 - 127283, n=20)	111796 MIPS -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	109330 MIPS -10%
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=230, last 2 years)	77467 MIPS -36%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	69146 MIPS -43%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	64439 MIPS -47%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	7084 MIPS +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	6918 MIPS 0%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	6897 MIPS 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	6890 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (6340 - 7177, n=20)	6848 MIPS -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	6445 MIPS -6%
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=230, last 2 years)	6139 MIPS -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5872 MIPS -15%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	5803 MIPS -16%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	20847 Points +3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	20634 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	20350 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	20182 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17614 - 21075, n=21)	19809 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	18152 Points -10%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	13717 Points -32%
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=235, last 2 years)	13658 Points -32%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10126 Points -50%
Single-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	2099 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	2047 Points +1%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	2043 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2036 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1345 - 2093, n=21)	1988 Points -2%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	1878 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=235, last 2 years)	1813 Points -11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	1805 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1590 Points -22%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	33.4 fps +10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	32.7 fps +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	32.7 fps +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	30.5 fps
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (23.5 - 34.4, n=21)	29.1 fps -5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	28.7 fps -6%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	21.4 fps -30%
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=233, last 2 years)	21.3 fps -30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	17.5 fps -43%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	56 s * -30%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=227, last 2 years)	49.1 s * -14%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	47.5 s * -10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	46.5 s * -8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	43 s *
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (32.8 - 51.1, n=20)	42.5 s * +1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	40.7 s * +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	38.2 s * +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	36 s * +16%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	0.4808 sec * -20%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=230, last 2 years)	0.4682 sec * -17%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	0.4323 sec * -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.4121 sec * -3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.4033 sec * -0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (0.375 - 0.4564, n=21)	0.402 sec * -0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.4014 sec *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	0.3954 sec * +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	0.3793 sec * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

4828 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

261 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

297 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	97.7 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	97.4 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	94.5 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93.3 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	91.1 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX	88.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	68.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	64.8 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	52.8 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	28957 KRay/s +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	28701 KRay/s +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)	27615 KRay/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	27524 KRay/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	25857 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17589 - 27615, n=21)	24097 KRay/s -12%
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=226, last 2 years)	18673 KRay/s -32%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	16115 KRay/s -41%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	9759 KRay/s -65%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	144303 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	138190 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)	136688 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	134221 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	125944 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (88686 - 137015, n=21)	120602 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	98800 Points -26%
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=226, last 2 years)	93765 Points -30%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	43695 Points -67%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	7093 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	6949 MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)	6799 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	6758 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	6350 MB/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4362 - 7029, n=21)	6061 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=226, last 2 years)	4343 MB/s -36%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	3504 MB/s -48%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	3422 MB/s -49%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	141427 Points +6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	139649 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)	134571 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (125644 - 141385, n=21)	133924 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	133226 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	133197 Points
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=226, last 2 years)	109706 Points -18%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	107120 Points -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	102167 Points -23%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	17117 Points +7%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	17057 Points +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)	16037 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	15947 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	15813 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (12334 - 17179, n=21)	14889 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	12783 Points -20%
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=226, last 2 years)	12219 Points -23%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	10402 Points -35%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	71038 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	70739 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)	69202 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	67872 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	63308 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (43850 - 69202, n=21)	59821 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	54060 Points -20%
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=226, last 2 years)	47973 Points -29%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	27285 Points -60%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (89413 - 237881, n=21)	139015 MB/s +9%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	136551 MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	135833 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	134166 MB/s +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)	129440 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	127548 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	125644 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=226, last 2 years)	108280 MB/s -15%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	106367 MB/s -17%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	2059 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	2030 MB/s +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)	1950 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	1928 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	1850 MB/s -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1284 - 1958, n=21)	1755 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=226, last 2 years)	1216 MB/s -37%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	1203 MB/s -38%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	845 MB/s -56%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	15573 KRay/s +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	15540 KRay/s +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)	15279 KRay/s +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	14995 KRay/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	13844 KRay/s -8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9481 - 15279, n=21)	13066 KRay/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=226, last 2 years)	10110 KRay/s -33%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	8529 KRay/s -43%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	5748 KRay/s -62%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	50834 MPixel/s +18%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (42994 - 51994, n=21)	48439 MPixel/s +13%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)	44270 MPixel/s +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	44016 MPixel/s +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	43025 MPixel/s
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	40896 MPixel/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=227, last 2 years)	36866 MPixel/s -14%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	34534 MPixel/s -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	30226 MPixel/s -30%

系统性能

这个迅捷的系统内部的硬件为游戏和渲染等任务提供了足够的性能。这款笔记本电脑配备了32GB的内存，以双通道模式运行。而且内存的传输率是典型的DDR5-4800内存。更重要的是，在我们的测试中，该系统还提供了极佳的PCMark结果。

PCMark 10 / Score
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	9331 Points +18%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8884 Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	8764 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (7690 - 9331, n=8)	8466 Points +7%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	8186 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	7932 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7888 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)	7592 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6966 Points -12%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11761 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	11512 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10972 - 11983, n=8)	11364 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	11275 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	11205 Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	11078 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years)	10731 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9740 Points -14%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	11680 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	11321 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9038 - 11680, n=8)	10423 Points -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	10144 Points -10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9851 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years)	9725 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9564 Points -16%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	8271 Points -27%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	16424 Points +55%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	16395 Points +55%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	14535 Points +37%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10605 - 16395, n=8)	14052 Points +32%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	13098 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years)	11476 Points +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	10611 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9848 Points -7%

CrossMark / Overall
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	2150 Points +1%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2139 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2125 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1825 - 2295, n=8)	2107 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	2080 Points -2%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1903 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years)	1881 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1699 Points -20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1592 Points -25%

CrossMark / Productivity
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	2014 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1978 Points
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1977 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1666 - 2166, n=8)	1960 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1909 Points -3%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1808 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years)	1791 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1646 Points -17%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1509 Points -24%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	2455 Points +3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2423 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	2392 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2389 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2162 - 2514, n=8)	2379 Points 0%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	2095 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years)	2046 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1867 Points -22%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1780 Points -25%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	1902 Points +2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1861 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1857 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1441 - 2275, n=8)	1833 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years)	1704 Points -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1666 Points -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1634 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1405 Points -24%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1342 Points -28%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4936 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		6075 points
PCMark 10 Score		7932 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77060 MB/s +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (67716 - 78835, n=21)	75033 MB/s +11%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	67716 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	67561 MB/s 0%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	63863 MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=226, last 2 years)	59534 MB/s -12%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	53861 MB/s -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	50231 MB/s -26%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	84869 MB/s +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (73998 - 88462, n=21)	82199 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	74518 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	74284 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=226, last 2 years)	63479 MB/s -15%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	62807 MB/s -15%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	57237 MB/s -23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	51403 MB/s -31%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	80441 MB/s +23%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (65472 - 77045, n=21)	73168 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	67449 MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	65472 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=226, last 2 years)	61731 MB/s -6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	60389 MB/s -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	55263 MB/s -16%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	54443 MB/s -17%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	99.5 ns * -12%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	98.4 ns * -10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	92.8 ns * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	90.8 ns * -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	89.3 ns * -0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	89.1 ns *
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=223, last 2 years)	87.2 ns * +2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (80.4 - 91.1, n=21)	86.3 ns * +3%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

我们的标准化延迟监测测试，包括网页浏览、4K视频播放和Prime95高负荷，发现了一些问题。该系统似乎不适合于实时视频和音频处理。我们希望未来的软件更新将有助于纠正这些问题。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4710.9 μs * -107%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4362 μs * -92%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2448.6 μs * -8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2275.2 μs *
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1101.9 μs * +52%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1095 μs * +52%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

Medion为我们的X40评测单元配备了两块由Phison制造的1TB SSD（PCIe 4.0，M.2-2280）。其中一个作为系统驱动器，另一个用于数据存储。不仅这些固态硬盘没有形成RAID配置，而且笔记本电脑本身也不支持RAID。所包含的驱动器并不属于市场上最好的固态硬盘。即便如此，它们仍然提供了很好的性能。另一个值得一提的事情是，我们没有注意到任何由热节流引起的性能下降。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7077 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4783 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 962.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 705.5 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3250 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 3156 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 55.25 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 265.1 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	78.3 pt
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	72.9 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	71.3 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	69.7 pt
Average of class Gaming	63.8 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	60.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	59.6 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	54.5 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5598 (5462.22^min - 5597.85^max) MB/s +79%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	4931 (4875.77^min - 4930.83^max) MB/s +58%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	4842 (4719.64^min - 4842.11^max) MB/s +55%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3872 (3855.82^min - 3871.97^max) MB/s +24%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3844 (3257.93^min - 3843.87^max) MB/s +23%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=199, last 2 years)	3539 MB/s +13%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3127 - 3582, n=3)	3287 MB/s +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3127 (2701.13^min - 3126.72^max) MB/s
seq write
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7533 (7482.85^min - 7532.79^max) MB/s +134%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	4819 (4728.89^min - 4819.25^max) MB/s +50%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4242 (4225.7^min - 4241.7^max) MB/s +32%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	4199 (3998.61^min - 4199.12^max) MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=199, last 2 years)	3829 MB/s +19%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3242 (1498^min - 3241.78^max) MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3218 (2245.63^min - 3218.43^max) MB/s
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (2507 - 3714, n=3)	3146 MB/s -2%
seq q8 t1 read
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	13195 (9412.86^min - 13194.8^max) MB/s +90%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11242 (10740.3^min - 11242.2^max) MB/s +62%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	10774 (9137.92^min - 10774^max) MB/s +55%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (6956 - 6976, n=3)	6966 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	6956 (5970.17^min - 6956.25^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	6872 (4963.33^min - 6872.25^max) MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (2268 - 16089, n=199, last 2 years)	6390 MB/s -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6384 (5573.36^min - 6384.17^max) MB/s -8%
seq q8 t1 write
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9942 (9912.92^min - 9941.76^max) MB/s +99%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	8404 (8165.05^min - 8403.71^max) MB/s +69%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	8227 (8104.29^min - 8226.71^max) MB/s +65%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5043 (5032.12^min - 5043.21^max) MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	4986 (4917.82^min - 4985.65^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=199, last 2 years)	4818 MB/s -3%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3723 - 5011, n=3)	4573 MB/s -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4244 (427.59^min - 4244.22^max) MB/s -15%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	83.1 (79.37^min - 83.07^max) MB/s +46%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	79.3 (77.82^min - 79.25^max) MB/s +40%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	79.1 (78.08^min - 79.08^max) MB/s +39%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=199, last 2 years)	67.9 MB/s +20%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (56.8 - 84.3, n=3)	66.1 MB/s +16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	57.5 (57.09^min - 57.53^max) MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	56.8 (53.63^min - 56.77^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	56.5 (49.8^min - 56.49^max) MB/s -1%
4k q1 t1 write
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (275 - 295, n=3)	284 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	283 (273.23^min - 283.12^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=199, last 2 years)	224 MB/s -21%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	220 (56.84^min - 219.56^max) MB/s -22%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	213 (205.52^min - 212.72^max) MB/s -25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	195.1 (194.02^min - 195.09^max) MB/s -31%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	170.2 (168.21^min - 170.2^max) MB/s -40%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	103.7 (103.17^min - 103.74^max) MB/s -63%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4483 (4465.42^min - 4482.78^max) MB/s +27%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3543 - 3578, n=3)	3557 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3543 (3529.91^min - 3542.8^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3111 (2388.54^min - 3111.42^max) MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=199, last 2 years)	2590 MB/s -27%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1469 (1266.81^min - 1469.47^max) MB/s -59%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	874 (867.39^min - 873.79^max) MB/s -75%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	711 (692.26^min - 710.64^max) MB/s -80%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4383 (4358.15^min - 4383.06^max) MB/s +19%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3688 (3576.03^min - 3687.54^max) MB/s
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3398 - 3688, n=3)	3564 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=199, last 2 years)	2152 MB/s -42%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1424 (1251.47^min - 1423.75^max) MB/s -61%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1282 (960.6^min - 1281.78^max) MB/s -65%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	461 (442.02^min - 461.29^max) MB/s -87%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	350 (343.49^min - 350.45^max) MB/s -91%

AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9218 Points +9%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (8477 - 8906, n=3)	8641 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	8477 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7311 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=186, last 2 years)	6843 Points -19%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	4941 Points -42%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4850 Points -43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	4364 Points -49%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3428 Points +1%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3332 - 3464, n=3)	3397 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3394 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3308 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (760 - 4721, n=186, last 2 years)	2508 Points -26%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2035 Points -40%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1948 Points -43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1858 Points -45%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4113 Points +21%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3399 - 3707, n=3)	3563 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3399 Points
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=186, last 2 years)	3120 Points -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2428 Points -29%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	2137 Points -37%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1877 Points -45%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1691 Points -50%
Seq Read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9511 MB/s +98%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	7888 MB/s +64%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	6561.69 MB/s +37%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5157 MB/s +7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	5144.76 MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=186, last 2 years)	4963 MB/s +3%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (4774 - 5200, n=3)	4925 MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	4799.93 MB/s
Seq Write
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7181 MB/s +83%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	5041 MB/s +28%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3925.33 MB/s
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3290 - 4309, n=3)	3842 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3733 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=186, last 2 years)	3673 MB/s -6%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	3480.87 MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3058.47 MB/s -22%
4K Read
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (60.6 - 97.3, n=3)	76 MB/s +25%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	72.8 MB/s +20%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	69.21 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	68.93 MB/s +14%
Average of class Gaming (30.4 - 112.1, n=186, last 2 years)	66.9 MB/s +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	60.64 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	58 MB/s -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	49.65 MB/s -18%
4K Write
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (168.4 - 294, n=3)	213 MB/s +21%
Average of class Gaming (96.3 - 512, n=186, last 2 years)	211 MB/s +20%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	184.49 MB/s +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	177.9 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	175.47 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	157.01 MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	144.8 MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	114.7 MB/s -35%
4K-64 Read
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2853.84 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2842.96 MB/s 0%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (2784 - 2854, n=3)	2828 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2744.3 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (442 - 3475, n=186, last 2 years)	1939 MB/s -32%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1223.07 MB/s -57%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1011 MB/s -65%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1011 MB/s -65%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3582.58 MB/s +27%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (2831 - 3086, n=3)	2966 MB/s +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2830.74 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=186, last 2 years)	2544 MB/s -10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1944.47 MB/s -31%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1604.89 MB/s -43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1072 MB/s -62%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	981 MB/s -65%
Access Time Read
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	0.085 ms *
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (0.078 - 0.086, n=3)	0.083 ms * +2%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=184, last 2 years)	0.05343 ms * +37%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	0.044 ms * +48%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.036 ms * +58%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.034 ms * +60%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	0.03 ms * +65%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.028 ms * +67%
Access Time Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.082 ms * -257%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	0.066 ms * -187%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=186, last 2 years)	0.04639 ms * -102%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	0.035 ms * -52%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.025 ms * -9%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.023 ms * -0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	0.023 ms *
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (0.013 - 0.023, n=3)	0.01967 ms * +14%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Load Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R: Ø6904 (5576.5-6952.06)

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB: Ø6785 (2053.41-13760.21)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024: Ø6412 (5645.36-6872.58)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW: Ø6279 (4891.05-6318.25)

Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0): Ø13136 (12495.08-13196.72)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0): Ø10730 (8845.37-10809.96)

图形卡

GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop 是Nvidia目前的旗舰移动GPU。它具有9,728个着色单元，256位内存总线和16,384 MB的高速GDDR6内存。RTX 4090有高达175瓦的TGP供其支配（150瓦+25瓦动态提升）--这已经是很高了。但在我们的Witcher 3 测试中，TGP并没有得到充分利用。

基准测试结果与（Optimus模式）持平，或略好于（dGPU模式）我们迄今为止从RTX 4090笔记本电脑平均看到的结果。这款笔记本电脑还支持高级优化模式。在dGPU和Optimus模式之间切换不需要重新启动计算机。

可选的水冷可以在一些基准测试和游戏中带来轻微的性能提升。Witcher 3例如，在我们的测试过程中，"DGPU "以更高的帧率运行。GPU的平均温度也比只使用空气冷却时低。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	99.4 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	96.8 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	96.7 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	95.1 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	92.7 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	91.8 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	81.8 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	70.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	63.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	62.2 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	69777 Points +2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	69211 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	68692 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU)	67073 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (56764 - 73027, n=36)	65041 Points -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	63818 Points -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	56565 Points -18%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	44381 Points -35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	43823 Points -36%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=232, last 2 years)	40487 Points -41%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU)	164399 Points +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	159724 Points +12%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	150156 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	142552 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	142520 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (95671 - 164399, n=12)	142108 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=142, last 2 years)	136246 Points -4%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	49247 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	49220 Points +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	48101 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (40220 - 53059, n=34)	46315 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU)	46047 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	44759 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	40570 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	33120 Points -26%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	32849 Points -27%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=236, last 2 years)	29457 Points -34%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	22479 Points +6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	22254 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU)	21900 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	21278 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	21167 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (17620 - 23292, n=36)	20991 Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	18441 Points -13%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	13455 Points -37%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	12684 Points -40%
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=234, last 2 years)	12066 Points -43%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		60717 points
3DMark 11 Performance		47487 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		66757 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		34788 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		19708 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming (9 - 142, n=181, last 2 years)	23.1 Seconds * -65%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)	15 Seconds * -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)	14 Seconds *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, dGPU, Cooling)	12 Seconds * +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9 - 19, n=34)	12 Seconds * +14%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)	11 Seconds * +21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (3.3.3)	10 Seconds * +29%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, dGPU)	10 Seconds * +29%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=188, last 2 years)	39.7 Seconds * -109%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)	22 Seconds * -16%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)	19 Seconds *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, dGPU, Cooling)	19 Seconds * -0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (16 - 24, n=34)	18.4 Seconds * +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (3.3.3)	18 Seconds * +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (3.3.3)	17 Seconds * +11%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, dGPU)	18 Seconds * +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)	17 Seconds * +11%

Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU)	215531 Points +8%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	215425 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	215359 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (6841 - 226512, n=34)	199598 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	198772 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	190582 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	173311 Points -13%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	147189 Points -26%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	138625 Points -30%
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 226512, n=234, last 2 years)	121576 Points -39%
Vulkan Score
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	134644 Points +1429%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	90003 Points +922%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1952 - 160279, n=31)	77192 Points +777%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	76932 Points +774%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU)	76039 Points +764%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	75965 Points +763%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	71346 Points +710%
Average of class Gaming (1952 - 160279, n=230, last 2 years)	42223 Points +380%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	27460 Points +212%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	8804 Points

Geekbench 6.0
GPU Vulkan
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1827 - 159996, n=9)	53177 Points +460%
Average of class Gaming (1827 - 159996, n=43, last 2 years)	46212 Points +387%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	9497 Points
GPU OpenCL
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	213472 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	208453 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (160333 - 213472, n=10)	192750 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (30029 - 213472, n=44, last 2 years)	116331 Points -46%

V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (5.0.1)	3590 mpaths +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU)	3569 mpaths +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1)	3551 mpaths
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)	3533 mpaths -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1982 - 3824, n=27)	3462 mpaths -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU, Cooling)	3335 mpaths -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)	2655 mpaths -25%
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=128, last 2 years)	2037 mpaths -43%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (5.0.1)	1880 mpaths -47%
GPU CUDA
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (5.0.1)	2644 mpaths +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1)	2589 mpaths
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU)	2589 mpaths 0%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)	2582 mpaths 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1454 - 2797, n=27)	2528 mpaths -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU, Cooling)	2424 mpaths -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)	1945 mpaths -25%
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=131, last 2 years)	1467 mpaths -43%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (5.0.1)	1384 mpaths -47%
CPU
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU, Cooling)	21230 mpaths +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1)	21011 mpaths
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU)	20543 mpaths -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (5.0.1)	20438 mpaths -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (12404 - 25897, n=25)	20002 mpaths -5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)	18935 mpaths -10%
Average of class Gaming (1690 - 26944, n=143, last 2 years)	13469 mpaths -36%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK (5.0.1)	12463 mpaths -41%

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (v4.10.07 )	1261 mpaths +1%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (v4.10.07 )	1252 mpaths 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )	1252 mpaths
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, dGPU)	1244 mpaths -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (873 - 1334, n=25)	1215 mpaths -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, dGPU, Cooling )	1122 mpaths -10%
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=188, last 2 years)	602 mpaths -52%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (v4.10.07 )	511 mpaths -59%
CPU
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (v4.10.07 )	32727 ksamples +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, dGPU, Cooling)	32036 ksamples +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (v4.10.07 )	31821 ksamples 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )	31769 ksamples
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, dGPU)	31120 ksamples -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (18206 - 37629, n=25)	29510 ksamples -7%
Average of class Gaming (2741 - 37629, n=188, last 2 years)	19284 ksamples -39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (v4.10.07 )	14909 ksamples -53%

SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (31.3 - 37.6, n=7)	34.6 fps +3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	34.28 fps +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	33.6 fps
Average of class Gaming (2.93 - 231, n=36, last 2 years)	32.8 fps -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	30 fps -11%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	59.5 fps
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	56.7 fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (50 - 59.9, n=7)	55.3 fps -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	49.97 fps -16%
Average of class Gaming (23.5 - 59.9, n=36, last 2 years)	38.8 fps -35%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	610.71 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (529 - 687, n=6)	595 fps +13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	555.93 fps +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	528.8 fps
Average of class Gaming (99.8 - 687, n=34, last 2 years)	397 fps -25%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	76.1 fps
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	74.95 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (70.6 - 76.5, n=7)	73.8 fps -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	62.41 fps -18%
Average of class Gaming (20.6 - 76.5, n=36, last 2 years)	42.3 fps -44%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	138.99 fps +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	131.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (113.3 - 141.9, n=7)	131.3 fps 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	130.27 fps -1%
Average of class Gaming (44 - 141.9, n=35, last 2 years)	103.5 fps -21%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	116.64 fps +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	112.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (17.8 - 117.2, n=7)	100.2 fps -11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	98.79 fps -12%
Average of class Gaming (17.8 - 117.2, n=36, last 2 years)	70.5 fps -37%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	212.6 fps +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	206.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (128 - 221, n=7)	197.4 fps -5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	177.9 fps -14%
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 221, n=36, last 2 years)	122.5 fps -41%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

X40让用户在QHD+和最大设置下玩游戏。如果你把笔记本电脑连接到适当的显示器上，就有可能使用更高的分辨率。我们测试的游戏通常以类似于我们到目前为止从RTX 4090所看到的帧率运行。根据游戏的情况，你可能能够通过直接从GeForce GPU驱动显示器来获得更高的帧率。

Performance Rating - Percent
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	98.2 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	98.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W ^-1! Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	96.5 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	96.3 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93.8 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	92.7 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	90.7 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	71.8 pt
Average of class Gaming	64.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60.5 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU)	206 (178.6^P1) fps +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Cooling)	204.9 (178^min) fps +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	198.9 (190^min, 191^P1) fps +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (139.2 - 216, n=32)	197.4 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	195.1 (169^min) fps
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	176.8 (159^min) fps -9%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	128 (124^min) fps -34%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	121 (98^min) fps -38%
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=228, last 2 years)	117.2 fps -40%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU)	151.6 (4.06^min, 90.9^P1) fps 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	151.3 (2.81^min, 111.1^P1) fps
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Cooling)	149.8 (3.42^min, 111.1^P1) fps -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	141.3 (4.69^min, 100^P1) fps -7%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	140.9 (3.54^min, 83.3^P1) fps -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	140.7 (3.02^min, 100^P1) fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (91.1 - 167.7, n=35)	138.7 fps -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	126.3 (5.94^min, 90.9^P1) fps -17%
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=219, last 2 years)	107.6 fps -29%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	101.8 (18.4^min, 71.4^P1) fps -33%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)	187.4 fps +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3, dGPU)	187.4 fps +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3, dGPU, Cooling)	186.8 fps +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)	177.6 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)	176.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (122.2 - 194.9, n=35)	173.2 fps -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)	157.8 fps -10%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	127.8 fps -27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	122.8 fps -30%
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=229, last 2 years)	111.5 fps -37%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, dGPU, Cooling)	378 (79.8^min, 269^P1) fps +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, dGPU)	376 (53.4^min, 284^P1) fps +3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	373 (29.9^min, 272^P1) fps +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	366 (29.1^min, 263^P1) fps 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	365 (90.9^min, 268^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (233 - 421, n=34)	355 fps -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	323 (61.7^min, 222^P1) fps -12%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	213 (71.8^min, 156.1^P1) fps -42%
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 421, n=227, last 2 years)	207 fps -43%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	201 (41.3^min, 148.1^P1) fps -45%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	194.7 (160^min) fps +14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	190.2 (160.9^min) fps +11%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	185.9 (157.5^min) fps +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Cooling)	184.5 (155.3^min) fps +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU)	182.3 (154.8^min) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (115.7 - 220, n=37)	176.6 fps +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	171.5 (144.2^min) fps
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	158.9 (139.1^min) fps -7%
Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=239, last 2 years)	143 fps -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	121.4 (106.8^min) fps -29%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	142.8 fps +11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	137 fps +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU)	136.8 fps +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Cooling)	136.6 fps +6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	134.2 fps +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	134.1 fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (77.8 - 166.2, n=41)	131 fps +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	128.3 fps
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	112.9 fps -12%
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 166.2, n=244, last 2 years)	102.2 fps -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	80.3 fps -37%

Returnal | Atomic Heart | Hogwarts Legacy | Company of Heroes 3 | Sons of the Forest

Returnal
1920x1080 Epic Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (141 - 155, n=3)	147.3 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	146 (65^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (27 - 155, n=25, last 2 years)	85.8 fps -41%
2560x1440 Epic Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (113 - 119, n=3)	115.7 fps +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	113 (67^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (45 - 119, n=20, last 2 years)	71.9 fps -36%
1920x1080 Epic Preset + Epic Ray-Tracing
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (126 - 128, n=2)	127 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	126 (63^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (4 - 128, n=11, last 2 years)	73.5 fps -42%

Atomic Heart
1920x1080 Atomic Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (128.6 - 166, n=3)	144.4 fps +12%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	128.6 (29^min, 91.2^P0.1, 105.8^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (10.2 - 166, n=17, last 2 years)	74.4 fps -42%
2560x1440 Atomic Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (93.8 - 135, n=3)	112.2 fps +20%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93.8 (31.5^min, 68.5^P0.1, 76^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (43.4 - 135, n=10, last 2 years)	72.3 fps -23%

Hogwarts Legacy
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	166.1 (7.97^min, 44.8^P0.1, 101.4^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (41.2 - 166.1, n=4)	93 fps -44%
Average of class Gaming (10.3 - 166.1, n=25, last 2 years)	74.7 fps -55%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	125.9 (16.5^min, 32.2^P0.1, 83.3^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (40.6 - 125.9, n=4)	78.4 fps -38%
Average of class Gaming (35 - 125.9, n=16, last 2 years)	63.3 fps -50%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Full Ray Tracing AA:High T
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	65.5 (24.6^min, 27.1^P0.1, 39.9^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (52.2 - 67, n=3)	61.6 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming (26.8 - 67, n=13, last 2 years)	46.3 fps -29%

Company of Heroes 3
1920x1080 Maximum Settings
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (215 - 235, n=2)	225 fps +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	215.2 (32.4^P0.1, 87.8^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (43.8 - 235, n=15, last 2 years)	131.6 fps -39%
2560x1440 Maximum Settings
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (176.4 - 194.8, n=2)	185.6 fps +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	176.4 (58.8^P0.1, 92.22^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (81.4 - 194.8, n=8, last 2 years)	129.4 fps -27%

Sons of the Forest
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (85.7 - 93.9, n=2)	89.8 fps +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	85.7 (46.8^min, 52.9^P0.1, 64.8^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (14.8 - 93.9, n=18, last 2 years)	69.2 fps -19%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (85.2 - 89.6, n=2)	87.4 fps +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	85.2 (38^min, 57.3^P0.1, 64.9^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (49.9 - 89.6, n=8, last 2 years)	67.8 fps -20%

为了测试笔记本电脑是否能在较长时间内以基本稳定的帧率运行游戏，我们在不移动玩家角色的情况下以全高清和最大质量设置运行了大约60分钟的《Witcher 3 》。我们没有观察到帧率的任何下降。

Witcher 3 FPS graph

Medion Erazer Beast X40 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø189.4 (179-197)

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø198.9 (190-214)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø166.9 (141-179)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø119.7 (105-125)

Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø121.3 (111-128)

Medion Erazer Beast X40 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; dGPU, Cooling: Ø200 (186-211)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	187.5	187.1	186	151.3	145.3
The Witcher 3 (2015)	586.4	511.4	363.8	195.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	215	193.5	182.6	171.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	232	207	176.2		146.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	187.1	162.9	128.3
Far Cry 5 (2018)	199	172	167	158	151
Strange Brigade (2018)	515	387	369	365	292
Hunt Showdown (2020)	367	285	262		168
Death Stranding (2020)	179	171.4	166.6	163	162.1
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020)	179.7	167.7	166.6	152.3	138.1
Back 4 Blood (2021)	403		309	309	327
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021)	163	160	158	152	141
Riders Republic (2021)	209	200	185	179	146
Elex 2 (2022)	118.2	117.1	116.2	116.2	116.7
F1 22 (2022)	301	290	268	118.2	79.9
The Quarry (2022)	278	211	177.3	146.1	100.2
Hogwarts Legacy (2023)	242	204	186.5	166.1	125.9
Returnal (2023)	178	171	164	146	113
Atomic Heart (2023)	205	161.8	144.2	128.6	93.8
Company of Heroes 3 (2023)	285.3	262.9	235.2	215.2	176.4
Sons of the Forest (2023)	96.1	90	87.9	85.7	85.2

排放物 - Erazer笔记本电脑可能会有相当大的噪音

噪声排放

笔记本电脑在日常使用中相对安静（如办公应用、网络浏览）。风扇甚至可能偶尔会停止转动。不足为奇的是，X40在重负荷下会变得相当响亮，在压力测试和Witcher 3 测试中产生高达53 dB(A)的噪音。尽管噪音水平相当高，但两个风扇产生的声音整体上是可以忍受的：嗖嗖的噪音伴随着铿锵的呼啸声，随着风扇速度的增加，逐渐变成了轻快的呼啸声。

当连接外部水冷装置时，笔记本电脑的风扇会减轻。然而，该装置本身也增加了整体噪音：尽管泵在使用时相对安静，但冷却器内的风扇会发出更多的喧嚣。综合考虑，我们认为使用水冷装置时，整体噪音更令人愉快。

Noise Level

Idle		25 / 29 / 35 dB(A)
Load		51 / 53 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX	Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX
Noise		-3%	13%	-3%	15%	4%
off / environment *	24	24.6 -3%	23 4%	26 -8%	22.7 5%	23.9 -0%
Idle Minimum *	25	29.2 -17%	23 8%	26 -4%	23.1 8%	23.9 4%
Idle Average *	29	29.2 -1%	23 21%	29 -0%	23.1 20%	32.6 -12%
Idle Maximum *	35	29.2 17%	23.6 33%	40 -14%	23.1 34%	32.6 7%
Load Average *	51	50.7 1%	39 24%	47 8%	31.9 37%	35.9 30%
Witcher 3 ultra *	51	53.3 -5%	51.6 -1%	52 -2%	52.5 -3%
Load Maximum *	53	61 -15%	51.3 3%	54 -2%	52.5 1%	55.8 -5%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在日常使用情况下，如运行办公软件和互联网浏览器，机箱温度保持在一个可接受的范围内。正如我们在压力测试和Witcher 3 测试中注意到的那样，笔记本电脑在负载下会明显发热，但不会过度发热。CPU的温度也没有让我们担心的理由。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


46 °C	48 °C	44 °C
45 °C	45 °C	40 °C
33 °C	28 °C	29 °C

Maximum: 48 °C
Average: 39.8 °C


50 °C	52 °C	44 °C
38 °C	40 °C	36 °C
32 °C	34 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 52 °C
Average: 39.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 47 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


29 °C	29 °C	30 °C
30 °C	29 °C	29 °C
27 °C	25 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 30 °C
Average: 28.2 °C


31 °C	31 °C	31 °C
29 °C	30 °C	29 °C
27 °C	27 °C	28 °C

Maximum: 31 °C
Average: 29.2 °C

Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


46 °C	47 °C	46 °C
46 °C	46 °C	41 °C
34 °C	29 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 40.7 °C


50 °C	52 °C	44 °C
43 °C	42 °C	38 °C
33 °C	34 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 52 °C
Average: 41 °C

Power Supply (max.) 47 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).

	Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Heat		13%	9%	-2%	4%	-0%
Maximum Upper Side *	48	40.6 15%	40 17%	49 -2%	49.6 -3%	54 -13%
Maximum Bottom *	52	41.1 21%	37.6 28%	52 -0%	42.4 18%	46 12%
Idle Upper Side *	30	26.2 13%	32.4 -8%	30 -0%	29.2 3%	30 -0%
Idle Bottom *	31	30.3 2%	31.4 -1%	33 -6%	32 -3%	31 -0%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

对于压力测试，我们让Prime95和FurMark运行了很长时间。它代表了一种极端情况，旨在评估系统在全负荷下的稳定性。CPU开始时的时钟速度很高（P-cores：4 GHz，E-cores：3.3 GHz），而GPU在1至1.5 GHz之间波动。大约5分钟后，CPU的P-cores和E-cores分别逐渐下降到2GHz和1.8GHz，但GPU的时钟攀升到大约2.3至2.4GHz。

发言人

立体声扬声器听起来还不错，但几乎不产生任何低音。我们建议使用一副耳机或外部扬声器以获得更好的音频体验。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Medion Erazer Beast X40 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - X40提供相当好的耐力

消耗功率

在Witcher 3 测试中，X40的功耗平均为280瓦，在压力测试中短暂地达到363瓦的峰值。虽然在Witcher 3 测试过程中，功耗略有下降，但在整个压力测试中，它的功耗是波动的。在空闲状态下，笔记本对内部硬件的耗电量相当正常。附带的充电器额定功率为330瓦，因此可以为笔记本电脑提供足够的电力。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / Watt
Idle	11 / 18 / 30 Watt
Load	136 / 363 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Medion Erazer Beast X40 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-5%	-14%	31%	-42%	-30%	-16%	5%
Idle Minimum *	11	14 -27%	15.2 -38%	7 36%	24.1 -119%	17.3 -57%	16.8 ?(7 - 32.3, n=22) -53%	13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=179, last 2 years) -25%
Idle Average *	18	21.6 -20%	22.8 -27%	11 39%	28.5 -58%	27 -50%	23.2 ?(14.2 - 42.6, n=22) -29%	19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=179, last 2 years) -7%
Idle Maximum *	30	24.8 17%	49.8 -66%	17 43%	60 -100%	46 -53%	34.3 ?(14.5 - 57.9, n=22) -14%	27 ?(9 - 101.1, n=179, last 2 years) 10%
Load Average *	136	122.5 10%	121.2 11%	92 32%	128.7 5%	133 2%	130 ?(79 - 164.1, n=22) 4%	111.3 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years) 18%
Witcher 3 ultra *	280	265 5%	242 14%	221 21%	254 9%
Load Maximum *	363	418 -15%	273.7 25%	306 16%	323 11%	329 9%	326 ?(221 - 418, n=22) 10%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years) 31%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Medion Erazer Beast X40; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø280 (254-311)

Medion Erazer Beast X40; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø259 (234-307)

Medion Erazer Beast X40; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø19.1 (11.1-96.6)

Power consumption with external monitor

Medion Erazer Beast X40; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø184 (178.8-203)

Medion Erazer Beast X40; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø222 (202-262)

Medion Erazer Beast X40; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø243 (231-254)

Medion Erazer Beast X40; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø285 (269-318)

Medion Erazer Beast X40; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø27.2 (20.4-72)

电池寿命

在Wi-Fi测试（使用脚本自动访问网站）和视频测试（以全高清方式循环播放H.264编码的短片《Big Buck Bunny》）中，17英寸笔记本电脑分别持续了6小时22分钟和6小时56分钟。在这两项测试中，笔记本电脑的所有省电功能都被禁用，屏幕亮度被设置为大约150cd/m²。当我们进行视频测试时，无线适配器也被禁用。

总的来说，对于这样一台高性能的笔记本电脑，Erazer的电池寿命非常好。它可以超过大多数竞争对手，甚至那些具有相同电池容量的竞争对手。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		9h 25min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 110)		6h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		6h 56min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 54min

	Medion Erazer Beast X40 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 87 Wh	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-18%	-13%	15%	-63%	-13%	-9%
Reader / Idle	565		533 -6%	722 28%	234 -59%		546 ?(57 - 1290, n=85, last 2 years) -3%
H.264	416	358 -14%		398 -4%		419 1%	400 ?(56 - 747, n=94, last 2 years) -4%
WiFi v1.3	382	319 -16%	365 -4%	537 41%	117 -69%	428 12%	368 ?(57 - 745, n=183, last 2 years) -4%
Load	114	86 -25%	81 -29%	109 -4%	46 -60%	56 -51%	84.7 ?(36 - 173, n=145, last 2 years) -26%
Witcher 3 ultra						53	80.6 ?(47 - 155, n=23, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 16:10 QHD显示屏

+ 良好的色彩还原度

+ G-Sync

+ 先进的Optimus

+ 纤细的边框

+ 坚固的金属机箱

+ 高系统性能

+ 2个PCIe 4.0固态硬盘，每个1TB

+ 雷电4

+ 机械键盘

+ 良好的电池寿命

+ 有水冷选项

Cons

- 显示屏可以使用更多的对比度

- 负载下声音大

- 没有电源传输

结论 - 卓越的高端游戏笔记本

Medion Erazer Beast X40是一款专为高要求使用场景设计的笔记本电脑，如视频编辑、渲染和游戏。这些应用所需的计算能力是由目前最强大的CPU-GPU组合之一提供的：一个酷睿i9-13900HX搭配 GeForce RTX 4090.

该处理器和显卡能够在高时钟速度下持续运行，而且X40产生的热量和噪音对于这类设备来说相当正常。

总而言之，Erazer Beast X40是一款引人注目的笔记本电脑，适合游戏和其他高要求的应用。

哑光的17英寸16:10显示屏（QHD，IPS，240Hz，G-Sync，sRGB）在大多数情况下看起来很棒。唯一的缺点是，它的对比度略微太低。极好的机械键盘（带RGB照明）使笔记本电脑看起来更有吸引力。那些从未使用过机械键盘的人将获得全新的打字体验。笔记本电脑上的Thunderbolt 4端口开辟了扩展选项（如外部GPU，对接解决方案），但不支持Power Delivery。

Erazer Beast X40的一个可能替代品是华硕ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY.华硕ROG以其18英寸16:10 QHD+面板、更多内存（64GB）和RAID支持而脱颖而出。它的价格约为4,800欧元（5,177美元），与 "野兽 "处于同一价格档次。如果钱不是问题，你可以看一下微星Titan GT77 HX 13V作为另一个选择。它的CPU性能略高，有三个SSD插槽，支持RAID和四个内存插槽。具有出色对比度的特别明亮的迷你LED显示屏是该设备的一个亮点。但整体包装将使你花费约6,600欧元（7,120美元）。

对水冷的评价

可选的水冷装置从根本上做到了它应该做的：提高性能（Medion承诺最多可提高10%）并减少热量和噪音。然而，在实际使用中，性能的提高是相当温和的，而且笔记本电脑被限制在一个固定的地方。剩下的唯一优势是更低的温度和噪音水平。这些好处是否值得多花250欧元（270美元），要由每个X40的所有者来决定。

价格和可用性

在德国，Medion Erazer Beast X40的评测配置可从Saturn.de获得。并标价为4,499欧元（4,856美元）。

Medion Erazer Beast X40 - 2023-03-20 03/20/2023 v7
Sascha Mölck

Chassis

84 / 98 → 86%

Keyboard

89%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

69 / 80 → 86%

Weight

57 / 10-66 → 84%

Battery

70 / 95 → 74%

Display

90%

Games Performance

100%

Application Performance

95%

Temperature

83 / 95 → 87%

Noise

69 / 90 → 77%

Audio

76%

Camera

44 / 85 → 52%

Average

78%

88%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Zhiwei Zhuang - Translator - 149 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Medion Erazer Beast X40回顾：配备RTX 4090的游戏笔记本

Sascha Mölck, 2023-03-24 (Update: 2023-03-24)

Medion Erazer Beast X40回顾：配备RTX 4090的游戏笔记本

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - Erazer有一个金属底盘

尺寸比较

规格--野兽的Thunderbolt 4

SD卡阅读器

连接性

网络摄像头

辅料

维护

担保

输入设备 - 带Cherry MX开关的机械键盘

键盘

触摸板

显示屏 - QHD+，长宽比为16:10

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

表现 - 猛禽湖与阿达-洛夫莱斯的结合

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

系统性能

DPC延时

大容量存储

Sustained Load Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS graph

排放物 - Erazer笔记本电脑可能会有相当大的噪音

噪声排放

温度

压力测试

发言人

Medion Erazer Beast X40 audio analysis

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI audio analysis

电源管理 - X40提供相当好的耐力

消耗功率

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 卓越的高端游戏笔记本

对水冷的评价

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare