评价--并非总是最薄的可折叠产品
Honor Magic V5 不仅拥有纤薄的机身设计，还配备了强劲的电池、快速的 SoC、出色的三摄像头和通过高 IP 认证的坚固设计，以及七年的更新服务。
在测试中可以明显看到，在温暖的天气里，显示器的亮度会迅速降低到 1,000 cd/m² 左右。遗憾的是，峰值亮度仅适用于 HDR 内容。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
Honor Magic V5 的零售价为 1,999 欧元（约合 2,340 美元），但在Honor 商店的首发式上降价 300 欧元。.
- $10.99MOOISVS 2+2Pack for Honor Magic V5 Flexible Privacy Screen Protector(Not Tempered Glass)(2Packs)+Lens Screen Protector(2Packs),Anti-Spy Flexible TPU Film,Easy Installation
- $9.99MOOISVS 2 Pack for Honor Magic V5 Camera Lens Protectors, Scratch-Resistant HD Clarity Ultra-Thin Tempered Glass Camera Cover with Aluminum Edging,Individual Metal Lens Cover, Black
规格 Honor Magic V5
外壳和功能 -Honor Magic V5，防护等级 IP59
Honor Magic V5 名义上是目前能买到的最薄的可折叠手机。至少在选择象牙白颜色版本时是这样，我们的测试设备也是象牙白。金色和黑色略厚（展开：4.2 毫米，合上：9.0 毫米）。我们非常喜欢 V5 的做工。尽管设计纤薄，但可折叠手机看起来很稳定，而且据说由于采用了碳纤维加固，内部显示屏也更加耐磨。
两块显示屏均可使用有源手写笔输入，可从Honor 选购。
在功能方面，该机型与 Magic V3.蓝牙 6.0 是新功能，Wi-Fi 7 终于可以使用 6 GHz 频段。支持的 5G 移动频段数量堪称典范。Magic V5 的语音质量在贴耳使用时非常出色，环境噪音基本被抑制。一项新功能是改进的实时电话翻译，现在可以完全离线工作，速度更快，占用内存空间更少。此外，Magic V5 还加入了人工智能深度伪造检测功能。
电容式指纹扫描仪集成在电源按钮中，用于生物识别安全。识别率高，解锁速度快。人脸识别功能可用于两个前置摄像头，即使在陡峭的视角下也能快速识别。线性振动电机工作谨慎，可在设置中进行调整。
软件和可持续发展 - Magic V5 七年来的不断更新
Honor Magic V5 预装了 GoogleAndroid 15 和 MagicOS 9.0.1。它可以享受七年的主要操作系统和安全更新，但这只适用于欧盟和英国的设备。在其他市场可能会更短。Magic7 Pro 的所有已知人工智能功能 Magic7 Pro或 Honor 400的所有已知人工智能功能都包括在内。其中一项新功能是改进了通话时的实时翻译，明显减少了延迟。
在可持续发展方面，Honor 几乎没有提供任何信息。此外，Foldable 也没有用户维修的计划。
摄像头 - 可折叠，配有高分辨率镜头
在光线充足的情况下，前置摄像头的自拍效果不错。在光线较暗的情况下，降噪效果会比较明显，也会消除图像细节。视频可以超高速（30 FPS）录制。
三摄像头还可用于自拍，外部显示屏可用作取景器。主摄像头可拍摄出均衡的照片，超广角也可拍摄出吸引人的图像，但边缘会略显模糊。该相机具有 3 倍潜望镜变焦（70 毫米），可依靠光学防抖功能。6 倍数码变焦几乎没有损失，最大放大倍数可达 100 倍。如果需要，还可以通过人工智能进行优化，这无疑可以提高拍摄物体时的质量；不过，在测试过程中，这种方法并没有改善文本质量。超广角和变焦镜头都非常适合微距拍摄。
Magic V5 能以 60 FPS 的最佳帧率录制 4k 视频，也可选择 HDR。
显示屏 - 明亮，但有局限性
Honor Magic V5 的可折叠主显示屏比上一代产品更加明亮，在色彩准确性方面也更胜一筹。如果手动调节亮度，最高可达到 641 cd/m²。启动环境光线传感器后，纯白显示屏的亮度会提高一倍以上。不过，遗憾的是，我们无法从白色区域较少的 OLED 面板上获得更高的亮度。峰值亮度标称为 5000 cd/m²，我们在 YouTube 上播放 HDR 视频时甚至大大超过了这一数值。
Honor 现在，Magic V3 已将高频 PWM 调光提升到与室外显示屏相同的水平。 Magic V3因此，敏感人群的抱怨几乎不复存在。其他功能，如昼夜节律夜间显示和散焦功能，为眼睛提供了额外的舒适感。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 1330 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.7 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
CCT: 6596 K
| Honor Magic V5 OLED, 2352x2172, 8" | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2184x1968, 8" | Oppo Find N5 AMOLED, 2480x2248, 8.1" | Huawei Mate X6 OLED, 2440x2240, 7.9" | Honor Magic V3 OLED, 2344x2156, 7.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -67% | -45% | -37% | -23% | |
| Brightness middle | 1330 | 1311 -1% | 1240 -7% | 1182 -11% | 1019 -23% |
| Brightness | 1357 | 1307 -4% | 1179 -13% | 1179 -13% | 1032 -24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 95 2% | 91 -2% | 97 4% | 95 2% |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.7 | 2.4 -243% | 1.36 -94% | 1.2 -71% | 1 -43% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2 | 3.4 -70% | 3.06 -53% | 2.9 -45% | 2.2 -10% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 2.2 -83% | 2.4 -100% | 2.2 -83% | 1.7 -42% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.03 108% | 2.239 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.26 97% |
| CCT | 6596 99% | 6413 101% | 6353 102% | 6741 96% | 6473 100% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
| Huawei Mate X6 | |
| Honor Magic V5 | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Honor Magic V5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
| Huawei Mate X6 | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 360 Hz Amplitude: 14.97 % Secondary Frequency: 4166 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 360 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 360 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8276 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6975 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6825 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.75 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.375 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.371 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms). | ||
封面显示
Magic V5 的封面显示屏似乎与 V3 基本相同，但在测试中显示的亮度更加均匀，手动亮度控制也扩展到最高 776 cd/m²。峰值亮度也是专门为 HDR 显示预留的。
面板的高频 PWM 调光在技术上与可折叠显示屏完全相同。投诉的可能性也很小。
| Honor Magic V5 OLED, 2376x1060, 6.4" | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2520x1080, 6.5" | Oppo Find N5 2616x1140, 6.6" | Huawei Mate X6 OLED, 2440x1080, 6.5" | Honor Magic V3 OLED, 2376x1060, 6.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | |||||
| Brightness middle | 1701 | 1348 | 1358 | 1658 | 1743 |
| Brightness | 1691 | 1346 | 1328 | 1663 | 1775 |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 94 | 96 | 98 | 88 |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.7 | 2.2 | 1.14 | 1.1 | 0.9 |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2 | 2.9 | 2.21 | 2.2 | 2.1 |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.04 108% | 2.213 99% | 2.27 97% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6396 102% | 6461 101% | 6504 100% | 6709 97% | 6353 102% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Huawei Mate X6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
| Honor Magic V3 | |
| Honor Magic V5 | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Honor Magic V5 | |
| Honor Magic V3 | |
| Huawei Mate X6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
Honor Magic V5 的进一步测量和基准测试
| Networking | |
| Honor Magic V5 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Oppo Find N5 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Huawei Mate X6 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Honor Magic V5 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | Oppo Find N5 | Huawei Mate X6 | Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -18% | -8% | 65% | 17% | -25% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 3870.06 | 4080.35 5% | 3437.47 -11% | 4370.48 13% | 3965 ? 2% | 2198 ? -43% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 3360.06 | 2239.55 -33% | 3251.98 -3% | 4030.38 20% | 3573 ? 6% | 1800 ? -46% |
| Random Read 4KB | 279.8 | 403.69 44% | 269.51 -4% | 503.63 80% | 367 ? 31% | 295 ? 5% |
| Random Write 4KB | 391.94 | 51.23 -87% | 339.32 -13% | 963.72 146% | 497 ? 27% | 338 ? -14% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.1 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMarkSteel Nomad 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor Magic V5 | |
| Oppo Find N5 | |
| Huawei Mate X6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Huawei Mate X6 | |
| Oppo Find N5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
| Honor Magic V5 | |
Honor Magic V5 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Honor Magic V5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
| Oppo Find N5 | |
| Huawei Mate X6 | |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Honor Magic V5 是目前最薄的可折叠产品，经过加固，具有 IP59 防护等级。它提供笔输入、蓝牙 6.0、Wi-Fi 7、多个 5G 频段以及离线实时翻译和深度防伪检测功能。
Honor Magic V5
- 08/25/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 88.1%  | Honor Magic V5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $9.99 MOOISVS 2+2Pack for Honor Ma... 2. $10.99 MOOISVS 2+2Pack for Honor Ma... 3. $9.99 MOOISVS 2 Pack for Honor Mag... | 217 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 7.95" 2352x2172 403 PPI OLED |
2. 87.2%  | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: $1,779.99 List Price: 2099€ | 215 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 8.00" 2184x1968 367 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
3. 87%  | Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $6.96 Kepuch Screen Protector Comp... 2. $12.68 Puccy 4 Pack Screen Protecto... 3. $6.07 FZZSZS (3-Pack for Oppo Find... List Price: 1577€ | 229 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 8.12" 2480x2248 412 PPI AMOLED |
4. 83.1%  | Huawei Mate X6 HiSilicon Kirin 9020 ⎘ HiSilicon Maleoon 920 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $9.89 AKABEILA Compatible with Hua... 2. $19.90 IPG Made for Huawei Mate X6 ... 3. $15.99 AKABEILA 3 Pack Screen Prote... List Price: 1999€ | 239 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 7.93" 2440x2240 418 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
