OPPO Find N6 评测：终于告别折痕

Name: Oppo Find N6
Brand: Oppo

已平滑处理。

OPPO 通过 Find N6 推出了新一代折叠屏手机，其设计更轻薄，性能更强劲，摄像头表现也更出色。这款高端智能手机将大尺寸折叠屏与当前顶级的硬件配置相结合，旨在同时满足商务用户和摄影爱好者的需求。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 06/12/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Foldable Smartphone Touchscreen

OPPO Find N6 评测

OPPO Find N6 充分展现了折叠屏手机的发展成就。尤其是几乎看不见的铰链和如今几乎难以察觉的屏幕折痕，无疑是其亮点所在，也使得这款设备更适合日常使用。出色的做工、更纤薄的机身以及持久的续航能力，也让这款设备的使用体验非常舒适。

Test device courtesy of Oppo

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

在性能方面，得益于骁龙 8 Elite Gen 5 芯片，Find N6 运行速度极快，但在持续高负载下会出现明显的降频现象。总体而言，其摄像头在折叠屏机型中表现出色，主摄和长焦镜头尤为亮眼，而超广角镜头则稍显逊色。屏幕色彩鲜艳、亮度出色，尽管未能达到数据手册中标注的峰值数值。值得批评之处包括扬声器音质较弱、未获得完整的防尘认证，以及维修和可持续性信息有限。

Pros

+ 出色的摄像头配置

+ 无折痕可折叠屏幕

+ 超长续航

+ 高性能SoC

Cons

- 高负载下严重降频

- 可用性

- 不防尘

- 音质一般

价格与库存情况

OPPO尚未公布Find N6在欧洲的官方建议零售价，因为该设备在该地区尚未正式发售。不过，该机型已在亚马逊上架销售，包括OPPO官方渠道，但售价相当高。全球版机型也可通过ProShop等零售商购买和Gomibo等零售商处购买，而中国版则可通过TradingShenzhen进行进口。具体供货情况、价格及保修条款可能因地区而异。

$1,349.25
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Cell Phone, 256GB AI Smartphone, Unlocked Android, AI Photo Edits, Large Screen, Long Battery Life, 2025, US 1 Yr Manufacturer Warranty, Blue Shadow
$1,223.31
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold - Unlocked Smartphone with Gemini - Moonstone - 256 GB
$1,159.00
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, Unlocked Android Smartphone, 512GB, Privacy Display, Galaxy AI, AI Camera, Super Fast Charging 3.0, Durable Battery, 2026, US 1 Year Warranty, Cobalt Violet

Bestpreis 1868 € Gomibo.de

Oppo Find N6 512GB stellar titanium

2. 1913 € Gomibo.at
3. 1949 € Proshop.de
4. 1949 € Proshop.at

OPPO Find N6 评测
OPPO Find N6 规格
机身：并非更薄，而是更窄且无折痕
功能：支持OPPO AI笔和快拍键
软件：Find N6 将获得Android 21更新
通信与GNSS：OPPO Find N6支持5G和Wi-Fi 7
手机功能与通话质量
相机：N6仅配备一枚镜头，这成为其短板
配件与保修：随附电源适配器
输入设备与操作：具备真正附加值的AI笔
可折叠屏幕：Find N6 配备的屏幕亮度高且色彩准确
封面显示：更高亮度
性能：OPPO Find N6 搭载骁龙 8 Elite Gen 5
排放：发现N6节气门控制非常严格
电池续航：可折叠设计，配备6,000毫安时电池
Notebookcheck 综合评分
替代方案一览

作为OPPO Find N6的继任者， Find N5的继任者，OPPO 继续深化其可折叠手机理念，并显著改善了前代产品的关键短板。特别是重新设计的铰链，使得屏幕折痕变得更加平坦，日常使用时整体手感也更为坚固。

与此同时，该设备更轻薄，折叠后更易于握持。 OPPO 还升级了性能，采用了当前的高端硬件，带来了更快的速度和更高的效率。此外，相机性能也得到了提升，这在光线较差的条件下尤为明显，同时优化的软件也使得在宽大的内屏上进行多任务处理更加流畅。

OPPO Find N6 规格

Oppo Find N6 (Find N Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 8c/8t, 2 x 4.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Prime, 6 x 3.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Performance, Oryon v3

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 840, Core: 1200 MHz

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

8.12 inch 1.1:1, 2480 x 2248 pixel 412 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, OLED, LTPO 1 - 120 Hz, PET & UTG;Cover display: 6.62 inches, 2616 x 1140, LTPO-OLED, 1 - 120Hz, Ceramic Guard, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB

, 480.4 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, dual gyro, proximity, compass, color temperature, hall, OTG, IR-Blaster

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 4.21 x 159.87 x 145.58

Battery

6000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-Carbon-Anode, Battery charge time: 50 %: 19 min, 80 %: 32 min, 100 %: 50 min; Battery charge cycles: not specified

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 200 MPix (Samsung HP5, 1/1.56", f/1.8, 23 mm, OIS) + 50 MPix (Samsung JN5, 3x optical zoom, f/2.7, 70 mm, OIS) + 50 MPix (Samsung JN5, Ultra Wide / Macro, f/2.0, 15 mm, AF) + 2 MPix (Color-Sensor); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.4, 21 mm)

Additional features

Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Virtual keyboard, ColorOS 16, 12 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX TWS+, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5.0, LDAC | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | DRM Widevine L1 | IP59 | USB Copy Test: 422.90 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | SAR: not specified | max. charging speed: 80 W (wired) / 50 W (wireless)Biometric security: capacitive fingerprint, 2D facial recognition | Vibration motor: linear | Telephony features: Dual-Nano-SIM, eSIM, Wi-Fi Calling, VoLTE Update Policy: not specified 5 years Android-Updates (till 03/2031), 6 years security patches (till 03/2032), fanless, waterproof

Released

03/17/2026

Weight

225 g

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

机身：并非更薄，而是更窄且无折痕

从外观上看，OPPO Find N6 与前代机型相比变化甚微，仍属最薄的折叠屏手机之一。不过，它的机身略微变窄、变短了。折叠屏的折痕几乎看不见，给人带来真正的惊艳效果。在特定光线条件下，肉眼仍能隐约察觉到折痕。触感方面，轻抚屏幕时完全感受不到折痕；只有用力按压屏幕时，才能感觉到折叠边缘。即使经过数周使用，这一特性依然保持不变。

这款折叠屏手机的做工非常出色。机身缝隙紧凑且均匀。在展开状态下尝试扭动机身时，Find N6 可能会发出轻微的吱呀声，但除此之外，整体手感非常稳固。它符合 IP59 级防水标准，但无法完全防尘。

OPPO Find N6提供星辰钛金和花漾橙两种配色。

尺寸对比 - 展开状态

尺寸对比 - 折叠状态

功能：支持OPPO AI笔和快拍键

OPPO Find N6 的功能配置令人印象深刻，除了支持带图像输出的高速 USB 3.2 接口外，还配备了红外发射器，可作为多种设备的遥控器使用。不过，该机未搭载 UWB 技术，且传感器中也缺少气压计。

OPPO配备了专用的Snap Key，其功能类似于iPhone上的“动作按钮”，但与Mind Space相连。这是一个由AI支持的内容中心。此外，AI Pen也可作为选配配件。

软件：Find N6 将获得Android 21更新

OPPO Find N6 预装了谷歌Android 16和ColorOS 16系统。该机型将获得为期五年的系统更新支持，以及额外一年的安全补丁更新。

OPPO 预装了若干第三方应用，例如 Netflix 和 Facebook，但这些应用均可卸载。

可持续发展

OPPO在其网站上提供了有关可持续发展的信息，但未针对单个产品发布报告。

Find N6 的包装体积较大，且基本不含塑料，不过外层包裹着收缩膜。这款折叠屏手机不支持用户自行维修。

通信与GNSS：OPPO Find N6支持5G和Wi-Fi 7

这款OPPO智能手机支持广泛的移动通信频段，在Wi-Fi方面也表现得无可挑剔。凭借支持6 GHz频段的Wi-Fi 7技术，Find N6不仅速度极快，在我们的测试中还展现出了稳定的传输速率。

Networking
Oppo Find N6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1851 (min: 1766) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1614 (min: 1559) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1862 (min: 1826) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1672 (min: 1649) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1505 (min: 1432) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1494 (min: 1302) MBit/s ∼89%
Honor Magic V5 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1650 (min: 1373) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1113 (min: 1064) MBit/s ∼67%
Oppo Find N5 Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	682 (min: 502) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1562 (min: 1218) MBit/s ∼97%
Huawei Mate X7 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	944 (min: 476) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	890 (min: 841) MBit/s ∼55%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	956 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1046 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1278 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1501 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼90%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	694 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	740 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1264 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1399 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼84%

Oppo Find N6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1862 (1826-1902) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1505 (1432-1642) MBit/s

Oppo Find N6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1670 (1649-1693) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1493 (1302-1580) MBit/s

Oppo Find N6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1851 (1766-1889) MBit/s

Oppo Find N6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1611 (1559-1661) MBit/s

OPPO Find N6 在户外能非常快速地锁定卫星信号。在室内，虽然需要稍长一点时间，但定位依然相当准确。

为了更好地评估定位性能，我们带着这款折叠屏手机去骑行，并将其与Garmin Venu 2进行了对比。值得注意的是，Find N6查询自身位置的频率略低，但在建筑物之间仍更为精准。总体而言，这是一款表现出色的产品。

手机功能与通话质量

在我们的测试中，OPPO Find N6 的通话音质表现令人满意。将手机贴近耳朵时，双方通话声音自然，背景噪音也过滤得相当好。在扬声器模式下，用户的声音听起来略显闷闷的，但通话体验依然不错。

相机：N6仅配备一枚镜头，这成为其短板

Find N6 的双前置摄像头在白天光线充足时表现不错。在光线较暗的环境下，成像细节会迅速受影响，但由于主摄像头也可用于自拍，因此这并不是什么大问题。视频支持以 30 FPS 的帧率录制 Ultra HD 格式。

后置摄像头组合令人印象深刻，其主摄性能强劲，同样由哈苏（Hasselblad）联合开发。即使在低光环境下，它依然能拍出吸引人的照片，并为追求极致的用户提供了“大师模式”。变焦功能在6倍光学变焦范围内表现出色，同时支持最高120倍的数字变焦。唯有超广角镜头稍显遗憾，其边缘处存在明显的畸变，且景深较浅。尽管如此，Find N6无疑拥有折叠屏手机中顶尖的摄像头配置之一。

视频支持以 Ultra HD 分辨率最高 120 FPS 的帧率录制。若需要更高的帧率，用户可切换至慢动作模式，不过在全高清（Full HD）下以 240 FPS 录制时，以及在高清（HD）下以 480 FPS 录制时，分辨率会有所妥协。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Hauptkamera Ultraweitwinkel 5-facher Zoom Low-Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件与保修：随附电源适配器

由于OPPO Find N6在欧洲并未正式发售，因此包装盒内附带了一个80瓦电源适配器。包装内还包含一个保护壳、一条USB数据线（Type-A转Type-C）以及一个SIM卡取卡针。OPPO AI Pen可选配。

国际保修期为12个月，而卖方的法定保修权利均不受此影响。

输入设备与操作：具备真正附加值的AI笔

OPPO Find N6 的屏幕滑动顺畅，触控响应精准。其亮点在于可折叠屏幕——并非因为它能折叠，而是因为折痕几乎看不见，触摸时也几乎感觉不到。

生物识别安全由电源键内的电容式指纹传感器负责，它能快速解锁手机，且识别率很高。不过，右侧按键的密度非常高，因为音量键和Snap Key也位于此处。后者位置较高，这意味着我们几乎每次都需要调整握持姿势才能触及。

可选配的AI Pen是一款支持蓝牙的智能输入触控笔。它握感舒适，书写体验流畅。该触控笔功能丰富，还能与OPPO的Mind AI进行交互。不过，它无法用作遥控器。

可折叠屏幕：Find N6 配备的屏幕亮度高且色彩准确

这款8.12英寸的内屏采用LTPO技术，刷新率可在1至120 Hz之间调节。据称该面板的峰值亮度可达2,500 cd/m²，但遗憾的是，我们在测试中并未达到这一数值。

在手动调节亮度时，我们测得亮度为586 cd/m²；而在白色背景且传感器开启的状态下，屏幕中心亮度可达1,179 cd/m²。当白色区域较小的情况下，我们测得的最高亮度仅为1,697 cd/m²。

两款显示屏均采用2,160 Hz的高频PWM调光，我们的测量结果证实了这一点。不过，我们还检测到180 Hz的基线闪烁。由于该频率相对较高，因此大多数敏感用户应该不会感到不适。


1194 cd/m²	1184 cd/m²	1183 cd/m²
1191 cd/m²	1179 cd/m²	1172 cd/m²
1188 cd/m²	1187 cd/m²	1176 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1194 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1183.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.15 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1179 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
CCT: 6662 K

	Oppo Find N6 OLED, 2480x2248, 8.1"	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2184x1968, 8"	Honor Magic V5 OLED, 2352x2172, 8"	Huawei Mate X7 OLED, 2416x2210, 8"	Oppo Find N5 AMOLED, 2480x2248, 8.1"
Screen		-15%	23%	-10%	-7%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1179	1311 11%	1330 13%	1005 -15%	1240 5%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1184	1307 10%	1357 15%	1021 -14%	1179 0%
Brightness Distribution (%)	98	95 -3%	93 -5%	97 -1%	91 -7%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.6	2.4 -50%	0.7 56%	1.4 13%	1.36 15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.9	3.4 -17%	2 31%	3.1 -7%	3.06 -6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.6	2.2 -38%	1.2 25%	2.2 -38%	2.4 -50%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.03 ^108%	2.25 ^98%	2.25 ^98%	2.239 ^98%
CCT	6662 ^98%	6413 ^101%	6596 ^99%	6890 ^94%	6353 ^102%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2570 cd/m² +90%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1467 cd/m² +8%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1353 cd/m²
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1300 cd/m² -4%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	5471 cd/m² +222%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2708 cd/m² +60%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1697 cd/m²
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1496 cd/m² -12%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

180 Hz
Amplitude: 14.43 %
Secondary Frequency: 2000 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 180 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 180 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7810 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

具有固定缩放比例和不同亮度设置的测量系列（在最低亮度下，振幅曲线看起来较为平坦，但这只是由于缩放比例所致。信息框中显示的是最低亮度下振幅的放大图）

只要在设置中选择“自然”配置文件和“暖色”色温，白平衡和色彩还原效果就会呈现自然状态。否则，显示效果会偏冷。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.05 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.539 ms rise
1.05 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.5095 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.3165 ms rise
0.52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.2035 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms).

在户外，只要阳光不是太强烈，OPPO Find N6的主屏幕依然清晰易读。

可视角度表现良好。在较小的可视角度下，画面会略微偏冷，亮度也会有所下降。

封面显示：更高亮度

这块封面屏在技术上与之类似，但由BOE生产，据称亮度可达3,500 cd/m²。遗憾的是，在测试中并未达到这一数值。在HDR播放时，我们测得的亮度仅为2,000 cd/m²。

	Oppo Find N6 OLED, 2616x1140, 6.6"	Honor Magic V5 OLED, 2376x1060, 6.4"	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2520x1080, 6.5"	Oppo Find N5 2616x1140, 6.6"	Huawei Mate X7 OLED, 2444x1080, 6.5"
Screen
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1180	1701	1348	1358	1572
Brightness (cd/m²)	1175	1691	1346	1328	1570
Brightness Distribution (%)	97	97	94	96	96
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.5	0.7	2.2	1.14	1.1
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.7	2	2.9	2.21	3.1
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.2	1.7	2.3	1.5	4.1
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	2.22 ^99%	2.04 ^108%	2.213 ^99%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6710 ^97%	6396 ^102%	6461 ^101%	6504 ^100%	6980 ^93%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Huawei Mate X7 unknown, unknown	3010 cd/m² +122%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2600 cd/m² +92%
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2306 cd/m² +70%
	1353 cd/m²
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1201 cd/m² -11%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4480 cd/m² +164%
Huawei Mate X7 unknown, unknown	3145 cd/m² +85%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2661 cd/m² +57%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2067 cd/m² +22%
	1697 cd/m²

具有固定缩放比例和不同亮度设置的测量系列（在最低亮度下，振幅曲线看起来较为平坦，但这只是缩放比例造成的。信息框中显示的是最低亮度下振幅的放大图）

性能：OPPO Find N6 搭载骁龙 8 Elite Gen 5

OPPO Find N6 搭载了骁龙 8 Elite Gen 5 ，并配备16GB LPDDR5x内存。尽管这款折叠屏手机是搭载该SoC的智能手机中运行速度较慢的一款，但其整体性能依然表现出色。

Geekbench 6.6
Single-Core
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	3649 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3462 - 3831, n=19)	3649 Points 0%
Honor Magic V5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	3044 Points -17%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	2888 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2703 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=203, last 2 years)	1850 Points -49%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	1297 Points -64%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9979 - 12383, n=19)	11035 Points +11%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	9979 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	9317 Points -7%
Honor Magic V5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	9138 Points -8%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	8243 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11811, n=203, last 2 years)	5492 Points -45%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	5234 Points -48%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9790 - 28557, n=12)	19614 Points +37%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=157, last 2 years)	15198 Points +6%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	14984 Points +5%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	14275 Points
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	9983 Points -30%

Antutu v11 - Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3477646 - 4273120, n=8)	3968972 Points +14%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	3477646 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2987729 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (584158 - 4273120, n=34, last 2 years)	2614114 Points -25%
Honor Magic V5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2487378 Points -28%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	1793229 Points -48%

CrossMark - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (1698 - 2856, n=14)	2307 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	1863 Points +8%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1724 Points
Average of class Smartphone (376 - 2856, n=116, last 2 years)	1213 Points -30%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	976 Points -43%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	Points -100%
Honor Magic V5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	Points -100%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (5640 - 16690, n=13)	12806 Points +15%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	11172 Points
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	9347 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=131, last 2 years)	7957 Points -29%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	7779 Points -30%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9356 - 21153, n=13)	17100 Points +42%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	12753 Points +6%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	12074 Points
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	11637 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=131, last 2 years)	11571 Points -4%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (5531 - 24052, n=13)	15527 Points +44%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	10779 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=131, last 2 years)	9069 Points -16%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	8647 Points -20%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	7463 Points -31%
Graphics
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	58651 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9859 - 61797, n=13)	49404 Points -16%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	40383 Points -31%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	28063 Points -52%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=131, last 2 years)	27904 Points -52%
Web
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (1561 - 2587, n=13)	2173 Points +6%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	2041 Points
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	1823 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=131, last 2 years)	1740 Points -15%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	1711 Points -16%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (10671 - 24002, n=9)	20825 Points
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=115, last 2 years)	20751 Points
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	11465 Points
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	10532 Points

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=92, last 2 years)	17787 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (774 - 2381, n=7)	1683 Points
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	1084 Points
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	787 Points

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=107, last 2 years)	678 Points +44%
Honor Magic V5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	676 Points +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (471 - 843, n=17)	633 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	482 Points +2%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	471 Points
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	332 Points -30%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=107, last 2 years)	2671 Points +467%
Honor Magic V5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	669 Points +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (471 - 843, n=17)	620 Points +32%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	471 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	463 Points -2%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	334 Points -29%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (124 - 49889, n=107, last 2 years)	3977 Points +241%
Honor Magic V5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	1576 Points +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (974 - 1987, n=17)	1422 Points +22%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1167 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	973 Points -17%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	741 Points -37%

AI Benchmark - Score V6
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	22223 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (1098 - 22780, n=8)	16771 Points -25%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	11267 Points -49%
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=82, last 2 years)	5674 Points -74%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	Points -100%

集成的 Adreno 840 支持所有现代图形API，并提供极佳的性能。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6924 Points
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5955 Points -14%
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	5901 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5575 Points -19%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3247 Points -53%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6924 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6126 Points -12%
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6121 Points -12%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6089 Points -12%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3234 Points -53%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	29029 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	26398 Points -9%
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	26317 Points -9%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	25231 Points -13%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	11874 Points -59%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	9692 Points
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	9657 Points 0%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3998 Points -59%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	9565 Points +5%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	9122 Points
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	4043 Points -56%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2310 Points
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2007 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1959 Points -15%
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1935 Points -16%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	993 Points -57%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2611 Points
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2374 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2255 Points -14%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1987 Points -24%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	998 Points -62%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	748 fps
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	665 fps -11%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	445 fps -41%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	343 fps
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	311 fps -9%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	221 fps -36%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	59 fps -2%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	301 fps
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	288 fps -4%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	177 fps -41%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	40 fps -33%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	213 fps
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	187 fps -12%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	84 fps -61%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	67 fps +12%
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53 fps -12%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	35 fps -42%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	125 fps
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	87 fps -30%
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	81 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	71 fps -43%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	50 fps -60%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	112 fps +87%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	56 fps -7%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	288 fps
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	221 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	196 fps -32%
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	181 fps -37%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	134 fps -53%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	53 fps
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	45 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	42 fps -21%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	38 fps -28%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	22 fps -58%

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total
Honor Magic V5 (Chrome 139)	329.39 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (Chrome 139)	222.934 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (70.1 - 409, n=9)	182.9 Points
Average of class Smartphone (59.7 - 423, n=131, last 2 years)	158.5 Points
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)	147.767 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (229 - 624, n=4)	512 runs/min
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)	244 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (49.3 - 733, n=94, last 2 years)	244 runs/min

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (14.4 - 31.4, n=7)	21.5 runs/min
Huawei Mate X7 (Chrome 145)	16.6 runs/min
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)	15.3 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (3.06 - 45.5, n=106, last 2 years)	15.1 runs/min

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (102 - 278, n=10)	169.7 Points +41%
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)	157 Points +31%
Huawei Mate X7 (Chrome 145)	145 Points +21%
Average of class Smartphone (56 - 306, n=116, last 2 years)	141 Points +18%
Oppo Find N6 (Chrome 147)	120 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (47984 - 126661, n=12)	83066 Points +37%
Oppo Find N6 (Chrome 147)	60680 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2800 - 126661, n=161, last 2 years)	51576 Points -15%
Huawei Mate X7 (Chrome 145)	48753 Points -20%
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)	45665 Points -25%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=139, last 2 years)	1071 ms * -67%
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)	873.45 ms * -37%
Huawei Mate X7 (Chrome 145)	786.6 ms * -23%
Oppo Find N6 (Chrome 147)	639.5 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (284 - 799, n=16)	466 ms * +27%

* ... smaller is better

	Oppo Find N6	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7	Honor Magic V5	Oppo Find N5	Huawei Mate X7	Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-33%	-20%	-27%	25%	-12%	-40%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	3861.06	4080.35 6%	3870.06 0%	3437.47 -11%	4365.76 13%	3635 ?(1954 - 4366, n=39) -6%	2253 ?(270 - 4370, n=185, last 2 years) -42%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	3531.83	2239.55 -37%	3360.06 -5%	3251.98 -8%	4112.78 16%	3164 ?(339 - 4113, n=39) -10%	1928 ?(103.2 - 4113, n=185, last 2 years) -45%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	446.52	403.69 -10%	279.8 -37%	269.51 -40%	463.43 4%	413 ?(279 - 614, n=39) -8%	309 ?(47.6 - 614, n=185, last 2 years) -31%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	637.68	51.23 -92%	391.94 -39%	339.32 -47%	1071.05 68%	491 ?(48.2 - 1071, n=39) -23%	361 ?(13.1 - 1071, n=185, last 2 years) -43%

排放：发现N6节气门控制非常严格

温度

表面温度表现平平，但在持续高负载下，SoC 会出现严重的降频现象。

Max. Load

Idle


48.3 °C	45.3 °C	38.6 °C
43.6 °C	39.1 °C	34.7 °C
29.8 °C	29 °C	28.6 °C

Maximum: 48.3 °C
Average: 37.4 °C


38.9 °C	42.7 °C	45 °C
35.3 °C	41.1 °C	46.3 °C
28.7 °C	28.8 °C	29.9 °C

Maximum: 46.3 °C
Average: 37.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 27.5 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	58 % +24%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	56.1 % +20%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51.5 % +10%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	46.8 %
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	42.4 % -9%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	55.2 % +16%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54.3 % +14%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	47.5 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	57.2 % +49%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	53.3 % +39%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	38.4 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	97.7 % +108%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58.3 % +24%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	57.8 % +23%
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	56.6 % +20%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	47 %

Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø23.8 (20-42.1) %

Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø13.6 (9.31-16.9) %

Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø84.5 (68.7-146.8) %

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø77.4 (66.8-129.7) %

Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.1 (30-70.7) %

Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø23.4 (15.3-39.8) %

Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø10.1 (5.54-10.4) %

Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø12.5 (9.28-19.8) %

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø11.5 (10.3-17.9) %

Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø6.36 (6.3-6.45) %

演讲嘉宾

这两只扬声器的声音较为单薄，听起来相当局促，低音几乎难以察觉。总体而言，音质高音过重。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Oppo Find N6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航：可折叠设计，配备6,000毫安时电池

功耗

功耗较低。Find N6 支持最高 80 瓦的有线充电，无线充电功率可达 50 瓦。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.11 / 0.35 Watt
Idle	0.79 / 1.6 / 1.66 Watt
Load	10.75 / 11.31 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Oppo Find N6 6000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 4400 mAh	Honor Magic V5 5820 mAh	Oppo Find N5 5600 mAh	Huawei Mate X7 5525 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		11%	15%	1%	14%	11%	7%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	0.79	0.63 20%	0.67 15%	0.9 -14%	0.53 33%	0.813 ?(0.57 - 1.2, n=12) -3%	0.872 ?(0.39 - 1.7, n=143, last 2 years) -10%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.6	1.48 7%	1.31 18%	1.4 13%	1.53 4%	1.283 ?(0.74 - 2.13, n=12) 20%	1.463 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=143, last 2 years) 9%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.66	1.55 7%	1.48 11%	1.9 -14%	1.56 6%	1.47 ?(0.75 - 2.18, n=12) 11%	1.65 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=143, last 2 years) 1%
Load Average * (Watt)	10.75			7.2 33%		7.97 ?(4.2 - 11.4, n=10) 26%	6.84 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=112, last 2 years) 36%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	11.31			12.8 -13%		11.3 ?(8.9 - 15.3, n=10) -0%	11.3 ?(4.75 - 22, n=112, last 2 years) -0%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench（150 cd/m²）

Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.11 (0.993-11.3) Watt

Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.69 (0.09289-15.2) Watt

Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.911 (0.832-1.037) Watt

Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.117 (1.048-1.805) Watt

功耗：GFXbench（150 cd/m²）

Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.21 (3.98-11.3) Watt

Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.8 (10.6-10.9) Watt

Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.911 (0.832-1.037) Watt

Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.117 (1.048-1.805) Watt

电池续航时间

在我们的实际Wi-Fi测试中，OPPO Find N6的续航时间长达近18小时，表现非常出色。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 146)		17h 59min

Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Oppo Find N6 6000 mAh	18 h
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 4400 mAh	14.3 h
Honor Magic V5 5820 mAh	16.2 h
Oppo Find N5 5600 mAh	21.8 h
Huawei Mate X7 5525 mAh	17 h

Notebookcheck 综合评分

OPPO Find N6 是一款非常成熟的可折叠手机，其屏幕折痕几乎不可见，摄像头性能强劲，电池续航时间长。尽管整体表现出色，但在高负载下的降频现象，以及音频、耐用性和超广角摄像头方面的一些小缺陷，多少影响了其表现。

Back to the verdict

Oppo Find N6 - 06/08/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

93%

Keyboard

69 / 75 → 92%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

67 / 69 → 97%

Weight

88%

Battery

91%

Display

92%

Games Performance

34 / 55 → 62%

Application Performance

74 / 85 → 87%

AI Performance

33%

Temperature

89%

Noise

100%

Audio

73 / 90 → 81%

Camera

84%

Average

70%

86%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
75%

Power Use
94.6%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
94.5%

Total Sustainability Score: 54.9%

替代方案一览

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 86.4%	Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon:	225 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	8.12" 2480x2248 412 PPI OLED
2. 87.2%	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: List Price: 2099€	215 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8.00" 2184x1968 367 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X
3. 88.1%	Honor Magic V5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon:	217 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7.95" 2352x2172 403 PPI OLED
4. 87%	Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: 1. $1,349.25 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Cell ... 2. $1,614.04 Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold - U... 3. $569.05 Google Pixel Fold - Unlocked... List Price: 1577€	229 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8.12" 2480x2248 412 PPI AMOLED
5. 85.4%	Vivo X Fold 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: 1. $439.99 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 5G U... 2. $1,349.25 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Cell ... 3. $1,223.31 Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold - U... List Price: 1300€	217 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	8.03" 2480x2200 413 PPI AMOLED LTPO
6. 84.5%	Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro ⎘ HiSilicon Maleoon 935 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: List Price: 2099€	236 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	8.00" 2416x2210 409 PPI OLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Add as a preferred source on Google

OPPO Find N6 评测：终于告别折痕

已平滑处理。

OPPO Find N6 评测

Pros

Cons

价格与库存情况

Table of Contents

OPPO Find N6 规格

机身：并非更薄，而是更窄且无折痕

尺寸对比 - 展开状态

尺寸对比 - 折叠状态

功能：支持OPPO AI笔和快拍键

软件：Find N6 将获得Android 21更新

可持续发展

通信与GNSS：OPPO Find N6支持5G和Wi-Fi 7

手机功能与通话质量

相机：N6仅配备一枚镜头，这成为其短板

配件与保修：随附电源适配器

输入设备与操作：具备真正附加值的AI笔

可折叠屏幕：Find N6 配备的屏幕亮度高且色彩准确

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

封面显示：更高亮度

性能：OPPO Find N6 搭载骁龙 8 Elite Gen 5

排放：发现N6节气门控制非常严格

温度

3DMark 压力测试

演讲嘉宾

Oppo Find N6 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 audio analysis

电池续航：可折叠设计，配备6,000毫安时电池

功耗

功耗：Geekbench（150 cd/m²）

功耗：GFXbench（150 cd/m²）

电池续航时间

Notebookcheck 综合评分

替代方案一览

Transparency

More articles related to this device

Related Articles