Notebookcheck Logo

Honor Magic V2 评测--超薄可折叠手机，动力强劲

革命？ 经过漫长的等待，它终于在全球市场上出现了，而且魅力丝毫未减。即使完全折叠，Honor Magic V2 的厚度也几乎没有超过一部传统智能手机，这就是它拥有如此巨大潜力的原因所在。终极智能手机？我们对它进行了测试。
Touchscreen Smartphone Foldable Android
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

Honor Magic V2 是 Magic Vs 的直接继承者。 Magic Vs.V2 的重量减轻了不少，机身也明显变得纤薄。作为其 2023 年 7 月在中国发布的一部分，我们得以对其进行首次 首次这款可折叠手机。当时，纤薄的设计让人惊叹不已，而大约六个月后，我们再次握住这款智能手机时又有了同样的感觉。

在全球版本中，Magic V2 将比上一代产品贵约 400 美元，售价约为 2000 美元。这是一个有信心的定价政策，因为来自 三星和 谷歌更便宜。在我们的评测中，我们将澄清Honor 可折叠手机是否仍是首选。

Honor Magic V2 (Magic V Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 740, Core: 719 MHz
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
7.92 inch 1.08:1, 2344 x 2156 pixel 402 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, OLED, LTPO 1 - 120 Hz; exterior screen: 6.43", 2376 x 1060 px, LTPO 1 - 120 Hz, Nanocrystal Glass 2.0; both: 3840 Hz PWM dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 485.88 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Gravity, Infrared, Gyroscope, Compass, Proximity, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz) 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19) LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 4.7 x 156.7 x 145.4
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon carbon battery
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.9, OIS) + 50 MPix (Ultra wide, f/2.0) + 20 MPix (2.5x opt. Telezoom, f/2.4, OIS); UHD video @ 60 FPS; Camera2 API level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.2, UHD video)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, 66W charger, case, USB cable, SIM tool, Magic OS 7.2, 24 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B2a, B1C), Galileo (E1, E5a); HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision; DRM Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
231 g
Price
1999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89 %
02/2024
Honor Magic V2
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		231 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.92"2344x2156
89.1 %
08/2023
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740		253 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.60"2176x1812
84.7 %
08/2023
Google Pixel Fold
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7		283 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.60"2208x1840
87.5 %
11/2023
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		259 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash8.03"2160x1916
87.2 %
03/2023
Honor Magic Vs
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		261 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.90"2272x1984
Honor Magic V2 的安全说明
Honor Magic V2 的安全说明

Honor Magic V2 展开后厚度仅为 4.7 毫米，即使折叠后厚度也不到 1 厘米（9.9 毫米），但这只适用于假皮版本。我们的评测设备是玻璃版本，厚度仅为 4.8/10.1毫米。Honor 可能是考虑到了圆形边框的比例问题。摄像头凸起的高度为 3.65 毫米。不过，V2 感觉非常纤薄，尤其是与竞争对手相比。

制造质量达到了很高的水平。缝隙尺寸紧凑、平滑，甚至 SIM 卡槽也与铝制边框齐平。铰链由不锈钢和钛元素组成，据说至少能承受 40 万次折叠过程。根据Honor 的说法，这大致代表了长达十年的使用时间（每天约 100 次折叠过程）。使用几天后，折痕就会显现出来，但在实际使用中并不明显。扭动时会发出嘎吱嘎吱的声音，不过 Magic V2 给人的印象还是非常牢固的。

Honor 可折叠手机没有指定的 IP 认证，但 SIM 卡缝隙是密封的，而且Honor 承诺，喷水应该不会造成任何问题，V2 也可以在自来水中清洗。尽管如此，应避免完全浸入水中。此外，在设置过程中，会显示可折叠手机的常规使用说明。

Honor Magic V2 在德国有黑色 PU 版和紫色磨砂玻璃后盖版。

(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
对比（从左至右）：三星 S23、Magic V2、iPhone 14 Pro（摄影：Daniel Schmidt三星Galaxy S23、Magic V2、iPhone 14 Pro（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
对比（从左至右）：三星 S23、Magic V2、iPhone 14 Pro（摄影：Daniel Schmidt三星Galaxy S23、Magic V2、iPhone 14 Pro（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
对比（左起）：三星Galaxy Z Fold4、Magic V2（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

尺寸比较

❌
161.2 mm 143.3 mm 5.3 mm 259 g160.3 mm 141.5 mm 6.1 mm 261 g158.7 mm 139.7 mm 6.05 mm 283 g156.7 mm 145.4 mm 4.7 mm 231 g154.9 mm 129.9 mm 6.1 mm 253 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

尺寸比较

❌
161.2 mm 73.5 mm 10.96 mm 259 g154.9 mm 67.1 mm 13.4 mm 253 g156.7 mm 74 mm 10.1 mm 231 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - 包括 USB 3.2 和红外触发器

Honor Magic V2 拥有一个遵循 3.2 标准的 USB-C 端口。在我们的拷贝测试中，它的传输速度高达 293 MB/s，而且还支持使用 NTFS 和 exFAT 文件系统的连接存储设备。它支持有线图像输出，但显示屏只能进行镜像。

除此以外，该产品的功能设置并不出众：蓝牙 5.3、NFC 和红外触发器。后者可将 V2 变为电视、空调等设备的遥控器。

顶部：扬声器、红外线、麦克风（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
顶部：扬声器、红外线、麦克风（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
左：音量（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
左：音量
右图：动力（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
右：电源
底部（下巴）：麦克风、USB、SIM 卡、扬声器（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
底部（下巴）：麦克风、USB、SIM 卡、扬声器（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）

软件 -Android 13 和 5 年更新

Honor Magic V2 预装了谷歌Android 13。除此之外，Honor 还拥有自己的用户界面 MagicOS 7.2。 Magic5 Pro或 Magic6 Lite.Honor 承诺总共提供四次重大更新和五年的安全更新。此外，Magic V2 配备了专用安全芯片Honor S1。

在中国发布会上，我们对Honor 可折叠手机的多任务处理能力并不完全满意。不过，Magic V2 支持大多数应用程序，这意味着两个应用程序可以在大显示屏上相邻显示。此外，它们还可以显示为可缩放、可移动的窗口，为了快速访问，它们还可以以缩小的尺寸堆叠在屏幕边缘。

在主屏幕上，按压缩放手势可激活 "平行空间"，其中的照片、视频和应用程序可与手机本身分开存储。此外，还可以通过生物识别技术对其进行进一步保护。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Magic V2 配备 Wi-Fi 7，但不含 6 GHz

Honor Magic V2 为移动通信提供广泛的频率覆盖，支持包括 5G Sub6 在内的所有现行标准。接收天线位于显示屏周围，将显示屏完全包围，这意味着无论如何握持智能手机，都能获得最佳接收效果。此外，Honor 还安装了射频放大器芯片组（Honor C1），进一步提高了连接性。在日常使用中，没有任何抱怨的理由。

遗憾的是，在 Wi-Fi 方面，情况有所不同。Magic V2 名义上支持 Wi-Fi 7，但不支持速度快、频率低的 6 GHz 频段。与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 搭配使用时，传输速度很稳定，但在接收数据时可能会更快。

Networking
Honor Magic V2
iperf3 receive AXE11000
772 (min: 722) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
932 (min: 460) MBit/s ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
iperf3 receive AXE11000
886 (min: 764) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
924 (min: 456) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1631 (min: 1075) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1601 (min: 1511) MBit/s ∼95%
Google Pixel Fold
iperf3 receive AXE11000
920 (min: 888) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
950 (min: 481) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1714 (min: 856) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1684 (min: 1447) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
iperf3 receive AXE11000
911 (min: 867) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
994 (min: 919) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1867 (min: 1829) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1645 (min: 811) MBit/s ∼98%
Honor Magic Vs
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1315 (min: 1162) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1467 (min: 1101) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
646 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
685 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1536 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1364 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼81%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1631 (1075-1812)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1598 (1511-1667)
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø771 (722-829)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø884 (764-954)
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø917 (460-972)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø909 (456-950)
GPS 测试：室内
室内
GPS 测试：户外
户外活动

Honor Magic V2 可以快速、可靠地定位。在室内，通常需要的时间会稍长一些，但即便如此，折叠式定位器的定位仍然很准确。

为了更好地评估日常使用中的定位精度，我们带着 Magic V2 进行了一次自行车旅行，并将其与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。当然，它也能发现行进路线上的偏差，但Honor 手机在导航任务中的表现还是不错的。

全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：总结
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：总结

电话功能和语音质量

Honor Magic V2 最多可容纳两张 nano-SIM 卡，此外还可使用 eSIM 卡。还支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话等功能。

将手机放在耳边，语音质量非常好，智能手机能很好地抑制环境噪音。同样，扬声器工作可靠，但 V2 用户听起来有点闷。

相机 - Magic V2 拥有出色的镜头

用 Magic V2 的主摄像头自拍
自拍：主摄像头
用 Magic V2 的主摄像头自拍
自拍：主摄像头

Honor Magic V2 的盖板和可折叠显示屏上的前置摄像头在技术上完全相同。它们都能拍摄出非常自然的照片，并能以最高 30fps 的超高清分辨率拍摄视频。不过，也可以使用主设置进行自拍。这可以通过拍照应用中的一个小开关区域来实现，这意味着盖板可以用作取景器。这些照片明显更生动、更细腻，也提供了更多的选择。

三摄像头系统不仅提供了三个镜头，还提供了用于快速对焦的 dToF、用于限制不必要闪烁的闪烁传感器以及用于更好地捕捉照片的色温传感器。该镜头拍摄的照片效果非常好，只有兔子图案的照片显示出衬衫的白色背景拍摄得太亮了。此外，在弱光条件下，图案不是特别清晰，这主要与Honor 无法在如此短的时间内捕捉到足够的光线有关。而在夜间模式下，这种效果就会更吸引人。不过，总的来说，这是一款非常出色的三防相机。此外，还配备了专业模式，并支持 RAW 格式。

在后端，视频的最高拍摄速度也是超高清，但在这种情况下，可达 60fps。在全高清模式下，您还可以选择使用 21:9 格式。在专业模式下，您还可以创建 10 位 LOG 视频。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x zoomLow-light
ColorChecker
8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Magic V2: 6.5 ∆E min: 1.6 - max: 11.31 ∆E
ColorChecker
21 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
33.3 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
24 ∆E
32.2 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
38.1 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
38.7 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Magic V2: 30.18 ∆E min: 12.23 - max: 43.37 ∆E

配件和保修 - Magic V2 不带充电器

与中国市场不同，Honor Magic V2 没有配备 66 瓦模块化充电器。包装盒内有一根 USB 数据线（A 型转 C 型）、一个 SIM 卡工具和一个保护套。此外，两个显示屏都贴有保护膜。用户不得将保护膜从显示屏上取下。需要充电器的用户可直接向Honor 订购，价格非常便宜（1 美元）。

在德国，Honor 为 Magic V2 提供 24 个月的保修服务。此外，在前 12 个月还提供额外的显示屏保护。

输入设备和操作 - 其他地方没有笔

两款电容式触摸屏均支持使用有源Honor Magic Pen 输入。遗憾的是，它既不包括在可折叠产品中，也不作为可选配件提供。相反，在中国以外地区，它是 Magic V2 RSR 的专利。这其实是个遗憾，因为它在我们的测试中给人留下了很好的印象。这支笔不仅擅长绘画，还可以用作演示文稿的遥控器。在触摸屏上按压和轻扫的效果很好，不过，没有贴膜的显示屏的轻扫阻力较小。

线性电机负责振动，可提供清晰、具体的反馈。电源按钮上的指纹传感器确保了生物识别的安全性。它具有良好的识别率，但并非无懈可击，但仍能以令人满意的速度解锁 Magic V2。在光线条件良好的情况下，通过前置摄像头进行人脸识别的速度更快，但安全性不高。

显示屏 - 两个明亮的 LTPO 面板

外接显示器的子像素结构
外接显示器的子像素结构
可折叠显示屏的子像素结构
可折叠显示屏的子像素结构

Honor Magic V2 的两款显示器都是 LTPO，具有 1 到 120 Hz 的自适应刷新率。它们支持所有常见的 HDR 标准，包括 HDR10+ 和杜比视界。

由于采用了全白图像和主动式环境光传感器，外接显示器的亮度略高。Honor ，峰值亮度为 2,500 cd/m²（外接显示器）和 1,600 cd/m²（内接显示器），而我们在测试过程中仅在一定程度上达到了这些数字。在明暗区域分布均匀的情况下（APL18），可折叠面板的亮度仅为 926 cd/m²，而在 HDR 播放时，我们测得的亮度为 1,589 cd/m²。封面显示屏的亮度分别为 1,053 和 1,399 cd/m²。任何希望手动设置亮度的用户都可以使用 576 cd/m²（正面：600 cd/m²）。

为了保护用户的眼睛，Honor 为两块显示屏提供了 3,840 Hz PWM 调光功能。我们只能在面板亮度稍高时进行测量，在最低亮度下，我们仍然记录到了 2,272 Hz 的良好值，这意味着这两款显示器在技术上可以说是无闪烁的。

964
cd/m²		953
cd/m²		964
cd/m²
954
cd/m²		961
cd/m²		957
cd/m²
933
cd/m²		932
cd/m²		934
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 964 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 950.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.33 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 961 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Honor Magic V2
OLED, 2344x2156, 7.92		Honor Magic V2
OLED, 2376x1060, 6.43		Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Dynamic AMOLED, 2176x1812, 7.60		Google Pixel Fold
OLED, 2208x1840, 7.60		Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
AMOLED, 2160x1916, 8.03		Honor Magic Vs
OLED, 2272x1984, 7.90
Screen
-58%
-98%
-43%
2%
-123%
Brightness middle
961
1093
14%
1104
15%
993
3%
1307
36%
803
-16%
Brightness
950
1087
14%
1107
17%
997
5%
1308
38%
809
-15%
Brightness Distribution
97
96
-1%
97
0%
94
-3%
96
-1%
97
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.8
1.4
-75%
3.1
-288%
1.4
-75%
1
-25%
2.27
-184%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.5
4.1
-173%
4.2
-180%
3.2
-113%
1.7
-13%
5.99
-299%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.2
2.7
-125%
3
-150%
2.1
-75%
1.5
-25%
3.9
-225%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.21 100%
2.01 109%
2.24 98%
2.24 98%
2.25 98%
CCT
6396 102%
6412 101%
6594 99%
6796 96%
6313 103%
6234 104%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2272 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 2272 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 2272 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

使用固定变焦和各种亮度设置进行测量的列表

由于 DeltaE 偏差极小，因此使用正常色彩模式可实现最自然的色彩再现。可折叠显示屏尤其具有出色的图像质量。

外部显示：灰度（色彩模式：正常，温度色：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
外部显示：灰度（色彩模式：正常，温度色：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
外部显示：色彩（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
外部显示：色彩（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
外部显示器：色彩空间（色彩模式：正常，温度色：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
外部显示器：色彩空间（色彩模式：正常，温度色：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
外部显示：饱和度（色彩模式：正常，色彩温度：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
外部显示：饱和度（色彩模式：正常，色彩温度：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
主显示屏：灰度（色彩模式：正常，温度色：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
主显示屏：灰度（色彩模式：正常，温度色：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
主要显示：色彩（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
主要显示：色彩（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
主要显示：色彩空间（色彩模式：正常，温度色：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
主要显示：色彩空间（色彩模式：正常，温度色：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
主显示屏：饱和度（色彩模式：正常，色彩温度：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
主显示屏：饱和度（色彩模式：正常，色彩温度：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
2.09 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.106 ms rise
↘ 0.9795 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.51 ms rise
↘ 0.6075 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

对于户外使用，Honor Magic V2 提供了足够的亮度储备，在阳光下依然清晰可辨。不过，主显示屏有点容易沾染指纹，这在明亮的环境中可能会成为一个问题。

即使从广角观看显示屏，其可视角度稳定性也很好，亮度仅略有下降，屏幕温度也较低。

Honor Magic V2 的视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 和 Asphalt 9（120 赫兹

配备 骁龙 8 第二代Honor Magic V2 可以依靠一个非常强大的平台。该平台由 16 GB 内存支持，并提供 512 GB 内部 UFS 4.0 存储空间。在中国发布时，这已经是非常先进的配置，即使在今天，它也能保证极快的速度。

基准测试成绩达到了预期水平，在日常使用中，Honor 智能手机的速度令人印象深刻。无论是执行简单任务还是多任务，V2 都不会出现卡顿现象。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.2 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1526 Points +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1048 - 1574, n=18)
1452 Points +39%
Honor Magic V2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1048 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)
911 Points -13%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
897 Points -14%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5005 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4192 - 5243, n=18)
4945 Points +11%
Honor Magic V2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
4439 Points
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3782 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)
2988 Points -33%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2084 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1999 Points +2%
Honor Magic V2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1960 Points
Honor Magic V2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1839 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1534 - 2104, n=11)
1940 Points -1%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1480 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=105, last 2 years)
1390 Points -29%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5525 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5384 Points +4%
Honor Magic V2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5179 Points
Honor Magic V2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
4454 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4255 - 5648, n=11)
5170 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=105, last 2 years)
3840 Points -26%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
3533 Points -32%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1308059 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1111522 - 1322448, n=15)
1263746 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1135554 Points +2%
Honor Magic V2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1111522 Points
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
782013 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points -34%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
619727 Points -44%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor Magic V2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
17095 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
16311 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
15761 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11562 - 19783, n=19)
15689 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)
11771 Points -31%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
11617 Points -32%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11296 Points -34%
CrossMark - Overall
Honor Magic V2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1259 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1253 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (778 - 1356, n=17)
1154 Points -8%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
911 Points -28%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
895 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points -34%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
Points -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
9730 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
9337 Points +4%
Honor Magic V2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
8990 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (7354 - 9730, n=17)
8759 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points -36%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
5704 Points -37%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5642 Points -37%
System
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
14032 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
13749 Points +2%
Honor Magic V2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
13439 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (10786 - 15148, n=17)
13206 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points -28%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8750 Points -35%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
8318 Points -38%
Memory
Honor Magic V2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
10351 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
10136 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (6601 - 10821, n=17)
9382 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
8467 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points -39%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
4556 Points -56%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3871 Points -63%
Graphics
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
32002 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
31928 Points +14%
Honor Magic V2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
27953 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (22837 - 32334, n=17)
27673 Points -1%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
23174 Points -17%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
16243 Points -42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points -49%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
2032 Points +21%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2009 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1077 - 2044, n=17)
1749 Points +4%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1720 Points +2%
Honor Magic V2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1680 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points -11%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1291 Points -23%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
37656 Points +196%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)
21814 Points +71%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
15942 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11338 - 16880, n=16)
15326 Points +20%
Honor Magic V2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
12742 Points
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8502 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1267 Points -90%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)
17833 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (941 - 157948, n=14)
12468 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1199 Points
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1001 Points
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
496 Points

骁龙 740 Adreno 740负责快速图形加速，还拥有基于硬件的光线追踪功能。

Magic V2 系列的一大特色是与 Gameloft 的合作。这意味着，赛车游戏《Asphalt 9: Legends》首次被专门改编为可折叠游戏，包括支持 120 Hz。本周应该就能实现，我们将适时提交基准测试结果。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3892 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3800 Points +5%
Honor Magic V2
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3614 Points
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2735 Points -24%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1711 Points -53%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3928 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3901 Points +4%
Honor Magic V2
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3737 Points
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2799 Points -25%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1760 Points -53%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14671 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14599 Points +4%
Honor Magic V2
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14043 Points
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10893 Points -22%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6849 Points -51%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7433 Points
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6278 Points
Honor Magic V2
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6120 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5983 Points +32%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4973 Points +10%
Honor Magic V2
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4528 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26316 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24283 Points +35%
Honor Magic V2
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18010 Points
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10577 Points -41%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15182 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14482 Points +34%
Honor Magic V2
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10839 Points
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8459 Points -22%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
502 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
419 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
329 fps
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
303 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92 fps
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
288 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
238 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
164 fps
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
213 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
146 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
136 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80 fps
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
125 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps
Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
188.652 Points +43%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
157.504 Points +19%
Honor Magic V2 (Chrome 120)
132.027 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.7 - 179.2, n=18)
128.9 Points -2%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
111.449 Points -16%
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
106.562 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points -20%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
185 Points +70%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
183 Points +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (28 - 183, n=17)
125.5 Points +15%
Honor Magic V2 (Chrome 121)
109 Points
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
101 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)
100.2 Points -8%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
81 Points -26%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
65418 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
60317 Points +27%
Honor Magic V2 (Chrome 120)
47385 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (19870 - 65418, n=20)
44774 Points -6%
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
43817 Points -8%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
36606 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)
33357 Points -30%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * -82%
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
1074.5 ms * -22%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
1055.4 ms * -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (654 - 1837, n=17)
1049 ms * -19%
Honor Magic V2 (Chrome 120)
877.9 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
693.3 ms * +21%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
653.8 ms * +26%

* ... smaller is better

Honor Magic V2Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Google Pixel FoldXiaomi Mix Fold 3Honor Magic VsAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-15%
-56%
-5%
-48%
-0%
-53%
Sequential Read 256KB
3401.13
4384.43
29%
1606.37
-53%
3572.73
5%
1695.2
-50%
3712 ?(2451 - 4512, n=19)
9%
1506 ?(226 - 4512, n=219, last 2 years)
-56%
Sequential Write 256KB
3136.56
2449.23
-22%
1169.32
-63%
2897.27
-8%
1296.5
-59%
3042 ?(1524 - 3678, n=19)
-3%
1115 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=219, last 2 years)
-64%
Random Read 4KB
444.78
459.94
3%
219.11
-51%
389.81
-12%
270.2
-39%
416 ?(268 - 480, n=19)
-6%
247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=219, last 2 years)
-44%
Random Write 4KB
533.65
161.39
-70%
238.72
-55%
506.41
-5%
300.1
-44%
530 ?(174.3 - 709, n=19)
-1%
271 ?(13 - 709, n=219, last 2 years)
-49%

排放 -Honor Magic V2 在负载情况下会严重节流

温度

即使在负载情况下，Honor Magic V2 的表面温度也无需担心，偶尔也会超过 40 度大关。

不过，纤薄的设计在 3DMark 压力测试中付出了代价，没有其他折叠式设备的性能出现如此大的下滑。尽管如此，它仍有足够的动力完成各种任务。

Max. Load
 26.8 °C43.8 °C42.9 °C 
 27.2 °C37.8 °C43.5 °C 
 26.7 °C35.1 °C36.5 °C 
Maximum: 43.8 °C
Average: 35.6 °C
33.2 °C42.6 °C27.6 °C
40.1 °C41.3 °C28.4 °C
32.4 °C32.3 °C27.8 °C
Maximum: 42.6 °C
Average: 34 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.8 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72.9 % +64%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70.3 % +58%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.9 % +35%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50.4 % +14%
Honor Magic V2
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44.4 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80.2 % +82%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.6 % +58%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67.2 % +53%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.2 % +35%
Honor Magic V2
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic V2
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67.7 %
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Honor Magic V2 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.7 (9.9-22.5)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø17.2 (15.6-23.3)
Honor Magic V2 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø46.8 (35.4-79.8)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø57.3 (50.1-83.6)
Honor Magic V2 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø12.5 (11.9-17.5)
Honor Magic V2 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø12.1 (11.8-17.5)

发言人

对于这类设备来说，Honor Magic V2 的扬声器的音场效果相当一般，低频区域的表现很差。这也是声音显得有点弱的原因之一。

另外，你还可以通过 USB-C 端口连接外置扬声器或耳机（均为有线）。蓝牙支持 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD 和 LDAC 编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.634.22525.933.13123.432.84027.3295036.234.26325.4278016.62810016.930.512514.73716013.151.620015.150.725014.35131511.652.34001055.45009.162.763011.163.18009.167.4100011.868.212501568.5160011.373.420001271.2250012.376315012.778400012.682.1500013.180.4630013.476.7800013.572.61000013.571.31250013.665.71600013.652.6SPL24.788.1N0.666.8median 13.1median 67.4Delta1.31130.937.222.325.323.225.625.42731.137.82026.317.82217.531.217.340.41555.215.154.816.358.113.556.713.956.113.463.813.365.311.769.61471.91475.413.377.21379.613.577.414.378.513.479.414.778.413.674.914.171.91467.314.26413.85725.888.40.771.1median 14median 69.60.710.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor Magic V2Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor Magic V2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - Magic V2 配备硅碳双电池

耗电量

在功耗测量方面，Honor Magic V2 也毫不逊色。这是Honor 急需改进的地方。

为这款可折叠设备充电的最快方法是通过Honor 的 SuperCharge（66 瓦）。使用这种方法，不到一小时就能充满储能电池。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.31 / 1.99 / 2.15 Watt
Load midlight 8.92 / 11.05 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Honor Magic V2
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
4400 mAh		Google Pixel Fold
4821 mAh		Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
4800 mAh		Honor Magic Vs
5000 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
32%
13%
-0%
11%
22%
29%
Idle Minimum *
1.31
0.55
58%
0.86
34%
0.86
34%
1.3
1%
1.052 ?(0.7 - 2.37, n=18)
20%
0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years)
32%
Idle Average *
1.99
0.9
55%
1.7
15%
1.05
47%
1.7
15%
1.49 ?(0.8 - 2.16, n=18)
25%
1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years)
27%
Idle Maximum *
2.15
1
53%
1.8
16%
1.07
50%
2
7%
1.632 ?(1.07 - 2.2, n=18)
24%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years)
24%
Load Average *
8.92
9.58
-7%
9.1
-2%
15.27
-71%
7
22%
6.81 ?(2.61 - 15.3, n=18)
24%
5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years)
38%
Load Maximum *
11.05
10.74
3%
11.06
-0%
17.78
-61%
10.1
9%
9.29 ?(4.57 - 17.8, n=18)
16%
8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years)
25%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.47 (1.093-8.9)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.08 (1.023-13.7)
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.477 (1.291-1.75)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.767 (0.706-1.165)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.49 (6.32-6.75)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.81 (6.01-13.1)
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.477 (1.291-1.75)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.767 (0.706-1.165)

电池寿命

Honor 标称电池容量为 5,000 mAh。实际上，我们使用的是两块锂电池，其中的硅碳成分可以在更小的面积上储存更多的能量。它们由一个 2,100 mAh 电池（8.21 Wh，3.91 V）和一个 2,900 mAh 电池（11.33 Wh，3.91 V）组成。

非常高的消耗值反映在电池的运行时间上，尽管如此，Magic V2 仍能使用主显示屏超过 12 小时，这是一个非常好的结果。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 120)
12h 07min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Honor Magic V2
5000 mAh
727 min
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
4400 mAh
763 min
Google Pixel Fold
4821 mAh
651 min
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
4800 mAh
923 min
Honor Magic Vs
5000 mAh
756 min

Pros

+ 超薄设计
+ 出色的摄像头
+ 超长电池寿命
+ 两台显示器均支持手写笔...

Cons

- ......但这支笔只配备 RSR 版本
- 没有 6 GHz Wi-Fi
- 无 IP 认证
- 无无线充电功能

结论--功能强大的折叠机，但存在技术差距

回顾： Honor Magic V2。评测设备由Honor 提供。
回顾： Honor Magic V2。评测设备由Honor 提供。

通过 Magic V2，Honor 创造出了一款非常出色的可折叠手机，其轻薄的设计尤其令人印象深刻。相比之下，它给人的感觉就像一部普通的智能手机，似乎没有 iPhone 15 Pro Max 那么笨重。

此外，Honor 的 Magic V2、Honor ，还采用了各种强大的技术。首先是电池，既轻薄又耐用。这延伸到良好的摄像头设置，并延续到友好的显示屏。

通过 Magic V2，Honor 令人印象深刻地证明了可折叠手机不一定是笨重的平板电脑，它仍然可以容纳大量的技术。

然而，Magic V2 并不完美，因为尽管价格不菲，它的功能设置仍存在一些不足。除其他外，我们怀念它加入的 6 GHz Wi-Fi 频段和无线充电功能。让人难以理解的是，为什么Honor 至少不提供神笔作为可选配件。

V2 最强劲的竞争对手仍然是 Galaxy Z Fold5Z Fold5 由于防水和更好的多任务处理能力而略胜一筹。Pixel Fold5 像素折叠只要你选择存储空间较小的型号，价格就会便宜一点。同样，它也具有防水功能，但要重得多，而且感觉没有那么高档。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

在英国，Magic V2 目前可从以下网站直接订购Honor.

Honor Magic V2 - 02/19/2024 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
89%
Keyboard
70 / 75 → 94%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
69 / 70 → 99%
Weight
88%
Battery
89%
Display
94%
Games Performance
61 / 64 → 95%
Application Performance
96 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
78%
Average
84%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Honor Magic V2 (Magic V Series)
Review
•
保时捷设计评测| Honor Magic V2 RSR - ...

Transparency

The present review sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Honor Magic V2 评测--超薄可折叠手机，动力强劲
Daniel Schmidt, 2024-02-23 (Update: 2024-02-23)