Notebookcheck Logo
华为 Mate X7 评测
ⓘ Notebookcheck (Marcus Herbrich)

纤薄Android 智能手机的出色摄像头令人印象深刻--华为 Mate X7 评测

相机推荐？

华为 Mate X7 薄度仅有 4 毫米多一点，其目标是与Galaxy Z Fold7 和Honor Magic V6 竞争，不仅采用了全新的海思麒麟 9030 Pro，还配备了超大光圈 HDR 摄像头。请阅读 Notebookcheck 的评测，了解这是否足以抵消谷歌 Play 商店的不足。更新：添加样张和游戏测试
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Foldable Smartphone Touchscreen

华为 Mate X7 的评价

Mate X7 是一款可靠的可折叠手机，拥有强大的摄像头配置，但作为一款 2026 年上市的可折叠手机，它在技术方面并不总是能与竞争对手的旗舰可折叠手机相媲美。它在蜂窝连接和性能等关键领域也存在弱点。由于不支持 5G，麒麟 9030 Pro 在日常使用中的表现虽然足够出色，但与骁龙旗舰机相比却相差甚远，因此至少在华为的预期价位上，它很难获得推荐。

尽管机身非常纤薄，但相机还是值得特别一提。对于一款轻薄的可折叠手机来说，Mate X7 的定位非常高。尤其是主摄像头，由于采用了可变光圈和出色的潜望式长焦镜头，华为很可能是目前可折叠手机中整体照片质量最好的，尽管由于采用了 RYYB 传感器，低光性能可能会稍好一些。

Pros

+ 优质构造
+ 稳定的电池续航时间
+ 作为一款可折叠手机，照片质量不错
+ 声音悦耳的扬声器

Cons

- 没有 5G 或 6GHz 无线网络连接
- 相当重
- SoC 性能较弱
- 只能通过变通方法访问 Play Store

华为 Mate X7 的价格和上市时间

华为 Mate X7 配备 16 GB 内存和 512 GB 闪存，建议零售价为 2,099 欧元（约合人民币 2,406 元）。这款可折叠手机可在德国亚马逊或直接从华为公司购买。

译者注：华为智能手机未在北美正式发售。

规格

Huawei Mate X7
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro 9c/14t, 1 x 2.8 GHz, 4 x 2.3 GHz, 4 x 1.7 GHz
Graphics adapter
HiSilicon Maleoon 935, Core: 933 MHz
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
8.00 inch 1.1:1, 2416 x 2210 pixel 409 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, OLED, Cover display: 6.49 inches, 2444 x 1080 pixels, 120hz, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 442 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, OTG, IR-Blaster
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B7/​B8/​B9/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B48/​B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 4.5 x 156.8 x 144.2
Battery
5525 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.5-f/4.0, 24 mm, 1/1.28", OIS) + 50 MPix (3.5x optical zoom, f/2.2, 81 mm, OIS) + 40 MPix (f/2.2, 13mm), camera2 API: full
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.2, cover display) + 8 MPix (f/2.4, inner display)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, case, info material, EMUI 15, 24 Months Warranty, HDR, HLG, HDR10, SAR value: 0.90W/​kg head, 1.23W/​kg body, GPS (L1/​L5), GLONASS, BeiDou (B1I/​B1C/​B2a/​B2b), Galileo (E1/​E5a/​E5b), QZSS (L1/​L5), NavIC, fanless, waterproof
Weight
236 g
Price
2099 Euro
Links
Huawei homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳和功能 - 可折叠智能手机在重量上的劣势

华为 Mate X7 黑色
ⓘ Huawei
华为 Mate X7 黑色

展开时，华为可折叠手机的厚度仅为 4.5 毫米；折叠时，Mate X7 的厚度为 9.5 毫米。这使得这款可折叠手机仅比目前的 旗舰手机.不过，Mate X7 236 克的重量确实受到了一些批评，因为 Galaxy Z Fold7和 Magic V5要轻得多。

Mate X7 的机身不仅给人高级感，而且还通过了 IP59 防水认证。折痕并不明显，但却清晰可见。鉴于无折痕竞争者的浪潮即将到来，华为 2026 年在这方面也不再处于领先地位。

与 Mate X6不同的是，2026 型号现在配备了 USB 3.1 端口。除了有线显示输出（包括可选的桌面模式）外，它还能实现快速数据传输。

尺寸对比 - 折叠件

❌
160.87 mm 74.42 mm 8.93 mm 229 g158.4 mm 72.8 mm 8.9 mm 215 g156.8 mm 73.8 mm 9.5 mm 236 g156.8 mm 74.3 mm 8.8 mm 217 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接和操作 -Android 带有 Wi-Fi 功能的手机 7

华为 Mate X7 配备了 NearLink，支持 Wi-Fi 7，但不使用 6 GHz 频段。结合我们的参考路由器--华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，这款可折叠手机显示出了一些小弱点，不过在日常使用中，Wi-Fi 传输速度相对较慢，不太可能引起注意。

这款可折叠智能手机不支持 5G，只能连接到 LTE 网络。它支持双卡双待，可使用两个 nano-SIM 卡或一个 nano-SIM 卡和一个 eSIM 卡。通话质量自然清晰。

在生物识别安全方面，电源按钮上集成了一个电容式指纹传感器，其良好的识别率和快速的响应时间给人留下了深刻印象。

Networking
Huawei Mate X7
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
944 (min: 476) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
890 (min: 841) MBit/s ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1505 (min: 1432) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1494 (min: 1302) MBit/s ∼100%
Vivo X Fold 5
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
557 (min: 409) MBit/s ∼34%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1367 (min: 820) MBit/s ∼91%
Honor Magic V5
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1650 (min: 1373) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1113 (min: 1064) MBit/s ∼74%
Oppo Find N5
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
682 (min: 502) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1562 (min: 1218) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
938 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1054 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1235 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1456 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
672 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
718 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1249 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1378 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼92%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Honor Magic V5 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1650 (1373-1842)
Honor Magic V5 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1112 (1064-1137)
Huawei Mate X7 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø928 (476-986)
Huawei Mate X7 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø889 (841-918)

软件与可持续发展 - 华为超薄手机仍未采用谷歌技术

华为 Mate X7 预装了基于开源Android 12 的 EMUI 15。它也没有预装谷歌服务或谷歌应用程序。如果用户觉得华为的 AppGallery 不足，可以转向极光商店。极光应用商店可完全访问 Google Play 应用商店库。

与 前代与前代产品相比，华为手机的更新支持有了明显改善。根据欧盟的新规定，华为还必须至少在理论上为其智能手机提供至少五年的安全更新。这一点在 EPREL 数据库中的可折叠手机中有所体现。

华为在可持续发展方面提供的信息很少。没有关于二氧化碳排放量或使用可回收材料的详细信息。不过，有一点值得肯定，那就是外包装由纸板制成，包装材料不使用塑料。

摄像头 -Android 手机，带 OIS 和 5000 万像素

前置摄像头自拍
前置摄像头自拍

Mate X7 配备了 5000 万像素主摄像头，传感器尺寸为 1/1.28 英寸，对于一款可折叠手机来说相当大。华为的可折叠手机还提供了从 f/1.49 到 f/4.0 的可变光圈。

效果并不十分顶级但对于一款超薄智能手机来说，它们已经非常出色了。我们尤其喜欢它的锐度和动态范围。在弱光环境下，由于采用的是 RYYB 传感器，我们本以为照明效果会稍好一些。即便如此，Mate X7 仍然不比 Galaxy Z 折叠 7.

不过，华为手机最大的优势并不在于主摄像头。4000 万像素的超广角摄像头，尤其是 5000 万像素的潜望式长焦摄像头和 3.5 倍变焦，在同类产品中堪称一流，让人眼前一亮。

华为 Mate X7 三星Galaxy S25 Ultra
华为 Mate X7
三星Galaxy S25 Ultra
0,6x
0,6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
2x
2x
10x
10x
100倍（最大值）
100倍（最大值）

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow LightWide angleZoom 5x
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
10.2 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
8 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
8 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo X Fold 5: 8.75 ∆E min: 2.19 - max: 14.65 ∆E
ColorChecker
9.4 ∆E
10 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
8 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find N5: 7.56 ∆E min: 2.3 - max: 12.36 ∆E
ColorChecker
11.1 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Mate X7: 7.08 ∆E min: 2.51 - max: 11.64 ∆E
ColorChecker
8.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Magic V5: 6.86 ∆E min: 2.36 - max: 11.71 ∆E
ColorChecker
3.5 ∆E
5 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: 3.96 ∆E min: 1.15 - max: 8.58 ∆E
ColorChecker
29 ∆E
49.1 ∆E
35.1 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
55.3 ∆E
47.9 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
57.3 ∆E
59.4 ∆E
25 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
33.5 ∆E
67.4 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
62.6 ∆E
48.7 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find N5: 41.22 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 67.44 ∆E
ColorChecker
27.7 ∆E
45 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
37 ∆E
48.9 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
38.7 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
52.3 ∆E
34.5 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
42.2 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo X Fold 5: 36.1 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 52.46 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.2 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
32.3 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
38.5 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
44 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
24 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
30.4 ∆E
42.4 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
39.5 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Mate X7: 32.59 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 47.11 ∆E

可折叠显示屏 -Android 配备 8 英寸 OLED 的智能手机

可折叠 120 Hz 主显示屏尺寸为 8 英寸，分辨率为 2,416 x 2,210 像素，像素密度为 409 ppi。在 APL 测量中，我们记录的峰值亮度约为 1,500 cd/m²，HDR 视频的峰值亮度同样为 1,496 cd/m²。这些都是可靠的数值，但 三星的可折叠要亮得多。

使用示波器，我们测得的基本频率为 360 赫兹。不过，也使用了超过 1,500 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光，因此对敏感用户的健康影响应该是有限的。

1016
cd/m²		1016
cd/m²		1019
cd/m²
1028
cd/m²		1005
cd/m²		1023
cd/m²
1037
cd/m²		1024
cd/m²		1019
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1037 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1020.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.45 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1005 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.75}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
CCT: 6890 K
Huawei Mate X7
OLED, 2416x2210, 8"		Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2184x1968, 8"		Vivo X Fold 5
AMOLED LTPO, 2480x2200, 8"		Honor Magic V5
OLED, 2352x2172, 8"		Oppo Find N5
AMOLED, 2480x2248, 8.1"
Screen
-4%
27%
32%
5%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1005
1311
30%
1085
8%
1330
32%
1240
23%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1021
1307
28%
1065
4%
1357
33%
1179
15%
Brightness Distribution (%)
97
95
-2%
96
-1%
93
-4%
91
-6%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.4
2.4
-71%
0.68
51%
0.7
50%
1.36
3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.1
3.4
-10%
1.6
48%
2
35%
3.06
1%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
2.2
-0%
1.1
50%
1.2
45%
2.4
-9%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.03 108%
2.247 98%
2.25 98%
2.239 98%
CCT
6890 94%
6413 101%
6545 99%
6596 99%
6353 102%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness
Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2570 cd/m² +75%
Huawei Mate X7
Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1467 cd/m²
Honor Magic V5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1300 cd/m² -11%
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic V5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
5471 cd/m² +266%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2708 cd/m² +81%
Huawei Mate X7
Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1496 cd/m²

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 360 Hz
Amplitude: 15.59 %
Secondary Frequency: 1562 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 360 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 360 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7986 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

主显示屏的色彩精确度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
主显示屏的色彩精确度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
主显示屏的色彩空间（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
主显示屏的色彩空间（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
主显示屏的灰度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
主显示屏的灰度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
0.93 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.516 ms rise
↘ 0.4115 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.71 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.3535 ms rise
↘ 0.352 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms).

覆盖式显示屏 - 比 OLED 大屏幕更亮

6.49 英寸外侧显示屏也是 120 Hz LTPO AMOLED 面板，但我们在这里测得的峰值亮度更高。在缩小白色区域测试（APL18：2,672 cd/m²）和 HDR 测量（2,759 cd/m²）中，两块屏幕中较小的一块明显更亮。

色彩还原也与可折叠面板相当，非常准确。华为在 PWM 调光方面也毫不妥协，在此采用了相同的技术。

Huawei Mate X7
OLED, 2444x1080, 6.5"		Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2520x1080, 6.5"		Oppo Find N5
2616x1140, 6.6"		Honor Magic V5
OLED, 2376x1060, 6.4"
Screen
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1572
1348
1358
1701
Brightness (cd/m²)
1570
1346
1328
1691
Brightness Distribution (%)
96
94
96
97
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
2.2
1.14
0.7
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.1
2.9
2.21
2
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.1
2.3
1.5
1.7
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.04 108%
2.213 99%
2.22 99%
CCT
6980 93%
6461 101%
6504 100%
6396 102%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness
Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Huawei Mate X7
unknown, unknown
3010 cd/m² +105%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2600 cd/m² +77%
Honor Magic V5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2306 cd/m² +57%

1467 cd/m²
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic V5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4480 cd/m² +199%
Huawei Mate X7
unknown, unknown
3145 cd/m² +110%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2661 cd/m² +78%

1496 cd/m²
室外显示色彩精度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
室外显示色彩精度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间室外显示（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
室外灰度显示（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

性能、排放和电池续航时间--采用新型芯片组的可折叠手机

华为的可折叠旗舰搭载了全新的 海思麒麟 9030 Pro.虽然目前在中国大陆之外还没有相关的官方信息，但华为向我们确认了 Pro 版本的安装。在日常使用中，Mate X7 的系统性能令人满意，即使是高分辨率的内部显示屏。

不过，在基准测试中，CPU 和 GPU 都明显落后于竞争对手的可折叠手机。Mate X7 的 SoC 其实并不比 麒麟 9020的 智能手机更符合 中档手机.根据 Geekbench 的数据，该基准测试使用了 9 个核心和 14 个超线程。这也与麒麟 9030 的规格不符，后者可能只有 10 个线程。

在 3DMark 压力测试中，华为旗舰机的节流也相当明显。在最糟糕的情况下，配备了 马龙 935性能减半。

Mate X7 的电池容量为 5,600 毫安时，通过 USB-C 接口充电的功率可达 66 瓦，无线充电的功率可达 50 瓦。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，这款配备大尺寸内显示屏的可折叠手机可持续使用约 17 个小时。这个成绩还不错，但与 OPPO 的 2025 旗舰的水平。充满电大约需要 45 分钟。

Geekbench 6.5 | 3DMark | GFXBench | Geekbench AI | CrossMark | Jetstream 2
Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Honor Magic V5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3044 Points +135%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2888 Points +123%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2703 Points +108%
Vivo X Fold 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2199 Points +70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=195, last 2 years)
1691 Points +30%
Huawei Mate X7
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384
1297 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
  (n=1)
1297 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
9317 Points +78%
Honor Magic V5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9138 Points +75%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
8243 Points +57%
Vivo X Fold 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6696 Points +28%
Huawei Mate X7
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384
5234 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
  (n=1)
5234 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11634, n=195, last 2 years)
4979 Points -5%
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
26398 Points +122%
Honor Magic V5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
26317 Points +122%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
25231 Points +112%
Vivo X Fold 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
18876 Points +59%
Huawei Mate X7
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384
11874 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
  (n=1)
11874 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (271 - 30621, n=178, last 2 years)
10696 Points -10%
Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
6126 Points +89%
Honor Magic V5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
6121 Points +89%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
6089 Points +88%
Vivo X Fold 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
4658 Points +44%
Huawei Mate X7
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384
3234 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
  (n=1)
3234 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (61 - 8140, n=180, last 2 years)
2824 Points -13%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
5955 Points +83%
Honor Magic V5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
5901 Points +82%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
5575 Points +72%
Vivo X Fold 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
4643 Points +43%
Huawei Mate X7
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384
3247 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
  (n=1)
3247 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 8102, n=179, last 2 years)
2810 Points -13%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
112 fps +100%
Vivo X Fold 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
80 fps +43%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
60 fps +7%
Honor Magic V5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
60 fps +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 166, n=192, last 2 years)
56.8 fps +1%
Huawei Mate X7
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384
56 fps
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
  (n=1)
56 fps 0%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
221 fps +65%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
196 fps +46%
Vivo X Fold 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
183 fps +37%
Honor Magic V5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
181 fps +35%
Huawei Mate X7
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384
134 fps
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
  (n=1)
134 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 367, n=192, last 2 years)
113.4 fps -15%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
67 fps +91%
Honor Magic V5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
60 fps +71%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
53 fps +51%
Vivo X Fold 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
51 fps +46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=193, last 2 years)
45 fps +29%
Huawei Mate X7
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384
35 fps
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
  (n=1)
35 fps 0%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
87 fps +74%
Honor Magic V5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
81 fps +62%
Vivo X Fold 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
72 fps +44%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
71 fps +42%
Huawei Mate X7
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384
50 fps
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
  (n=1)
50 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 146, n=192, last 2 years)
43.4 fps -13%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic V5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
45 fps +105%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
42 fps +91%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
38 fps +73%
Vivo X Fold 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
34 fps +55%
Huawei Mate X7
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384
22 fps
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
  (n=1)
22 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.54 - 62, n=193, last 2 years)
20 fps -9%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Honor Magic V5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
676 Points +104%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5210, n=82, last 2 years)
674 Points +103%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
482 Points +45%
Vivo X Fold 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
422 Points +27%
Huawei Mate X7
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384
332 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
  (n=1)
332 Points 0%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=82, last 2 years)
2609 Points +681%
Honor Magic V5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
669 Points +100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
463 Points +39%
Vivo X Fold 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
415 Points +24%
Huawei Mate X7
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384
334 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
  (n=1)
334 Points 0%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=82, last 2 years)
3871 Points +422%
Honor Magic V5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1576 Points +113%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
973 Points +31%
Vivo X Fold 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
933 Points +26%
Huawei Mate X7
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384
741 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
  (n=1)
741 Points 0%
CrossMark
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1863 Points +91%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2856, n=107, last 2 years)
1102 Points +13%
Huawei Mate X7
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384
976 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
  (n=1)
976 Points 0%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
Points -100%
Honor Magic V5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
Points -100%
Productivity
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1964 Points +105%
Average of class Smartphone
  (198 - 2366, n=107, last 2 years)
1030 Points +8%
Huawei Mate X7
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384
957 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
  (n=1)
957 Points 0%
Creativity
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1787 Points +107%
Average of class Smartphone
  (163 - 2123, n=107, last 2 years)
924 Points +7%
Huawei Mate X7
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384
864 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
  (n=1)
864 Points 0%
Responsiveness
Average of class Smartphone
  (239 - 13042, n=107, last 2 years)
2980 Points +115%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1802 Points +30%
Huawei Mate X7
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384
1387 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
  (n=1)
1387 Points 0%
Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Vivo X Fold 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
263.453 Points +37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2 - 480, n=66, last 2 years)
209 Points +9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
  (n=1)
191.7 Points 0%
Huawei Mate X7
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384
191.6543 Points
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
113.584 Points -41%
Huawei Mate X7Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Vivo X Fold 5Honor Magic V5Oppo Find N5Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-40%
-32%
-33%
-38%
-26%
-53%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
4365.76
4080.35
-7%
3879.64
-11%
3870.06
-11%
3437.47
-21%
3713 ?(1954 - 4366, n=30)
-15%
2087 ?(270 - 4370, n=184, last 2 years)
-52%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
4112.78
2239.55
-46%
3545.98
-14%
3360.06
-18%
3251.98
-21%
3265 ?(1240 - 4113, n=30)
-21%
1796 ?(103.2 - 4113, n=184, last 2 years)
-56%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
463.43
403.69
-13%
311.09
-33%
279.8
-40%
269.51
-42%
405 ?(279 - 614, n=30)
-13%
293 ?(47.6 - 614, n=184, last 2 years)
-37%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
1071.05
51.23
-95%
309.42
-71%
391.94
-63%
339.32
-68%
487 ?(48.2 - 1071, n=30)
-55%
346 ?(9.4 - 1071, n=184, last 2 years)
-68%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Huawei Mate X7; Genshin Impact: Ø60.1 (58-61)
Huawei Mate X7; PUBG Mobile; Smoothest: Ø59.4 (49-61)
Huawei Mate X7; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (57-61)
Huawei Mate X7; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (38-41)
Huawei Mate X7; Dead Trigger 2: Ø60.3 (59-61)
Max. Load
 42.5 °C45.2 °C42 °C 
 38.5 °C40.2 °C37.4 °C 
 29.7 °C30.8 °C28.8 °C 
Maximum: 45.2 °C
Average: 37.2 °C
39.7 °C40.9 °C39.8 °C
33.5 °C34.7 °C38.9 °C
28.2 °C29.1 °C30 °C
Maximum: 40.9 °C
Average: 35 °C
Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic V5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
58 % +37%
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56.1 % +32%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51.5 % +21%
Huawei Mate X7
Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
42.4 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Vivo X Fold 5
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
73.3 % +33%
Huawei Mate X7
Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
55.2 %
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.3 % -2%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Vivo X Fold 5
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
57.8 % +8%
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.2 % +7%
Huawei Mate X7
Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
53.3 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Huawei Mate X7
Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
97.7 %
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.3 % -40%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.8 % -41%
Honor Magic V5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
56.6 % -42%
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø13.6 (9.31-16.9)
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22.4 (19.1-35.1)
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.1 (30-70.7)
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø87.1 (72.8-129.9)
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø59.5 (34.2-69.8)
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø10.1 (5.54-10.4)
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø24.8 (18.7-32.7)
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø6.36 (6.3-6.45)
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø11.2 (9.05-15.5)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.626.92526.217.53120.222.84034.331.35039.237.3632420.3801420.110013.728.312514.442.8160185620014.552.925014.755.831513.261.440012.357.350010.963.863011.568.680011.367.6100011.470.5125011.675.5160011.673.4200011.770.1250012.168.2315012.370.7400012.773.3500013.176.9630013.173.480001365.31000013.168.71250013.159.1160001346.6SPL24.584N0.659.5median 13median 67.6Delta1.36.742.743.646.241.239.632.43530.837.933.926.525.622.123.225.334.824.7452451.520.453.715.855.117.959.314.95717.659.325.567.617.765.217.46815.37116.270.114.871.5166817.861.6166522.16921.671.826.166.820.456.920.460.120.959.532.280.31.647.9median 17.9median 61.63.17hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Mate X7Oppo Find N5
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei Mate X7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Oppo Find N5 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 145)
17h 01min
Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Huawei Mate X7
5525 mAh
17 h
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
4400 mAh
14.3 h
Vivo X Fold 5
6000 mAh
15.2 h
Honor Magic V5
5820 mAh
16.2 h
Oppo Find N5
5600 mAh
21.8 h

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Mate X7 是一款不错的可折叠手机，但它在多个方面仍落后于可折叠手机精英，而不仅仅是 SoC。遗憾的是，价格并没有反映出这一点。

Huawei Mate X7 - 03/11/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
68 / 75 → 91%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
62 / 69 → 89%
Weight
87%
Battery
91%
Display
91%
Games Performance
29 / 55 → 53%
Application Performance
63 / 85 → 74%
AI Performance
22%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
85%
Average
69%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
30%
Packaging
85%
Power Use
90.8%
Repairability
44%
Software Updates
90%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 56.6%

可比较的替代品

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
84.5%
Huawei Mate X7
Huawei Mate X7
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro ⎘
HiSilicon Maleoon 935 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 		List Price: 2099€236 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash8.00"
2416x2210
409 PPI
OLED
2.
87.2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon: List Price: 2099€215 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash8.00"
2184x1968
367 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
3.
85.4%
Vivo X Fold 5
Vivo X Fold 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 		List Price: 1300€217 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash8.03"
2480x2200
413 PPI
AMOLED LTPO
4.
88.1%
Honor Magic V5
Honor Magic V5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon: 217 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash7.95"
2352x2172
403 PPI
OLED
5.
87%
Oppo Find N5
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $9.96
Kepuch Screen Protector Comp...
2. $1,433.64
OnePlus Open, 16GB RAM+512GB...
3. $799.00
HONOR Magic V2 Standard Edit...
List Price: 1577€		229 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash8.12"
2480x2248
412 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

More articles related to this device

Huawei Mate X7 (Mate X7 Series)

Related Articles

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 纤薄Android 智能手机的出色摄像头令人印象深刻--华为 Mate X7 评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2026-03-16 (Update: 2026-03-16)