Notebookcheck

三星 Galaxy S8 智能手机简短评测

Marcus Herbrich, Daniel Schmidt (translated by Kangfei Zheng), 05/14/2017
Smartphone Android Touchscreen

更精细。 作为三星Galaxy S7的继任者,该机运用了全新的设计语言,抓住用户眼球:窄边框,大屏幕。Galaxy S8也是比其姐妹机型更平衡的产品,而且价格更低。

Samsung Galaxy S8 (Galaxy Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G71 MP20, Core: 850 MHz
Memory
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4
Display
5.8 inch 2.06:1, 2960x1440 pixel 568 PPI, 电容式触屏, Infinity Display, Corning Gorilla Glas 5, Super AMOLED, Mobile HDR Premium, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 52.3 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 耳麦二合一(3.5 毫米), Card Reader: micro-SD 最高 256 GB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, position, heartbeat, Hall, rotation, proximity, pressure and G-sensor, barometer, digital compass, iris scanner, face recognition, BeiDou, Galileo, Ant+, MST, Wifi Direct, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, LTE Cat. 16, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 148.9 x 68.1
Battery
3000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (dual-pixel, OIS, f/1.7, 1,4 μm, UHD video)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (autofocus, f/1.7)
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: virtual, 电源,USB电缆,AKG耳机,两个OTG适配器,SIM卡工具,快速入门指南,安全说明, Samsung Experience UI 8.1, 24 Months Warranty, USB Type-C (USB 3.1 Gen.1), Bixby, head-SAR: 0.315 W/kg, body-SAR: 1.27 W/kg, IP68 certificate, fanless
Weight
155 g, Power Supply: 62 g
Price
799 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
532 MBit/s ∼100% +62%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB eMMC Flash
515 MBit/s ∼97% +57%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
329 MBit/s ∼62%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
325 MBit/s ∼61% -1%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
308 (min: 48.8) MBit/s ∼58% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
281 MBit/s ∼53% -15%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
651 MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
485 MBit/s ∼75% -25%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB eMMC Flash
435 MBit/s ∼67% -33%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (min: 154) MBit/s ∼53% -47%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
335 MBit/s ∼51% -49%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
220 MBit/s ∼34% -66%
Samsung Galaxy S8: Overview
Samsung Galaxy S8: Overview
Samsung Galaxy S8: Woods
Samsung Galaxy S8: Woods
Samsung Galaxy S8:Bridge
Samsung Galaxy S8:Bridge
Garmin: Overview
Garmin: Overview
Garmin: Woods
Garmin: Woods
Garmin: Bridge
Garmin: Bridge
Samsung Galaxy S8
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Samsung Galaxy S8
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Samsung Galaxy S8
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
ColorChecker Passport: Target colors are displayed in the lower half of each patch.
543
cd/m²
566
cd/m²
574
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
566
cd/m²
570
cd/m²
563
cd/m²
562
cd/m²
575
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 575 cd/m² Average: 564.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 566 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | - Ø
99.87% sRGB (Argyll) 81.57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.15
Samsung Galaxy S8
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8
Samsung Galaxy S7
SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1
LG G6
IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7
Huawei P10
LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Lenovo Moto Z
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
OnePlus 3T
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
7%
-29%
-33%
14%
5%
-79%
Brightness
564
351
-38%
611
8%
556
-1%
553
-2%
490
-13%
430
-24%
Brightness Distribution
94
98
4%
89
-5%
86
-9%
97
3%
92
-2%
84
-11%
Black Level *
0.23
0.43
0.35
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.7
2.04
24%
4.5
-67%
4.8
-78%
1.4
48%
2.1
22%
7.1
-163%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.1
1.63
47%
6
-94%
4.5
-45%
1.3
58%
2.6
16%
6.8
-119%
Gamma
2.15 112%
2.07 116%
2.27 106%
2.39 100%
2.21 109%
2.23 108%
2.23 108%
CCT
6335 103%
6391 102%
7996 81%
7194 90%
6667 97%
6843 95%
7866 83%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
86.86
6%
67.74
-17%
63.1
-23%
88.14
8%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87
99.35
-1%
99.05
-1%
99.83
0%
100
0%
Contrast
2809
1272
1591

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8568 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
171884 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S7
127902 Points ∼56% -26%
Huawei P10
140084 Points ∼61% -19%
LG G6
151751 Points ∼67% -12%
Apple iPhone 7
142532 Points ∼63% -17%
HTC U Ultra
139017 Points ∼61% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ
129317 Points ∼57% -25%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points ∼57% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
148698 Points ∼65% -13%
OnePlus 3T
159866 Points ∼70% -7%
Google Pixel XL 2016
138641 Points ∼61% -19%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
6300 Points ∼23%
Huawei P10
6036 Points ∼22% -4%
Apple iPhone 7
5585 Points ∼20% -11%
HTC U Ultra
3983 Points ∼14% -37%
Sony Xperia XZ
3701 Points ∼13% -41%
Lenovo Moto Z
3946 Points ∼14% -37%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
4292 Points ∼16% -32%
OnePlus 3T
4236 Points ∼15% -33%
Google Pixel XL 2016
4167 Points ∼15% -34%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
1970 Points ∼34%
Huawei P10
1935 Points ∼34% -2%
Apple iPhone 7
3490 Points ∼60% +77%
HTC U Ultra
1643 Points ∼28% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ
1647 Points ∼29% -16%
Lenovo Moto Z
1480 Points ∼26% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
1728 Points ∼30% -12%
OnePlus 3T
1881 Points ∼33% -5%
Google Pixel XL 2016
1513 Points ∼26% -23%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
6711 Points ∼27%
LG G6
4369 Points ∼17% -35%
Apple iPhone 7
5922 Points ∼23% -12%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
1997 Points ∼34%
LG G6
1831 Points ∼31% -8%
Apple iPhone 7
3527 Points ∼59% +77%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
2494 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2022 Points ∼66% -19%
Huawei P10
1902 Points ∼62% -24%
LG G6
1955 Points ∼64% -22%
HTC U Ultra
1763 Points ∼57% -29%
Sony Xperia XZ
1667 Points ∼54% -33%
Lenovo Moto Z
1797 Points ∼58% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
1857 Points ∼60% -26%
OnePlus 3T
1728 Points ∼56% -31%
Google Pixel XL 2016
1935 Points ∼63% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
3472 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2216 Points ∼41% -36%
Huawei P10
2409 Points ∼45% -31%
LG G6
2980 Points ∼55% -14%
HTC U Ultra
2405 Points ∼45% -31%
Sony Xperia XZ
2853 Points ∼53% -18%
Lenovo Moto Z
2336 Points ∼43% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
2933 Points ∼54% -16%
OnePlus 3T
2418 Points ∼45% -30%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2820 Points ∼52% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
3194 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2170 Points ∼56% -32%
Huawei P10
2274 Points ∼59% -29%
LG G6
2669 Points ∼69% -16%
HTC U Ultra
2225 Points ∼57% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ
2548 Points ∼66% -20%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼56% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
2598 Points ∼67% -19%
OnePlus 3T
2221 Points ∼57% -30%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2560 Points ∼66% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
2440 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2010 Points ∼65% -18%
Huawei P10
2193 Points ∼71% -10%
LG G6
1961 Points ∼64% -20%
Apple iPhone 7
1525 Points ∼50% -37%
HTC U Ultra
1646 Points ∼53% -33%
Sony Xperia XZ
1667 Points ∼54% -32%
Lenovo Moto Z
1828 Points ∼59% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
1927 Points ∼63% -21%
OnePlus 3T
1452 Points ∼47% -40%
Google Pixel XL 2016
1902 Points ∼62% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
4923 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S7
3018 Points ∼39% -39%
Huawei P10
2816 Points ∼36% -43%
LG G6
4121 Points ∼53% -16%
Apple iPhone 7
4057 Points ∼52% -18%
HTC U Ultra
3807 Points ∼49% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ
4522 Points ∼58% -8%
Lenovo Moto Z
3718 Points ∼48% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
4746 Points ∼61% -4%
OnePlus 3T
3310 Points ∼43% -33%
Google Pixel XL 2016
3935 Points ∼51% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
4015 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2715 Points ∼55% -32%
Huawei P10
2649 Points ∼53% -34%
LG G6
3282 Points ∼66% -18%
Apple iPhone 7
2964 Points ∼60% -26%
HTC U Ultra
2947 Points ∼59% -27%
Sony Xperia XZ
3275 Points ∼66% -18%
Lenovo Moto Z
3023 Points ∼61% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
3580 Points ∼72% -11%
OnePlus 3T
2577 Points ∼52% -36%
Google Pixel XL 2016
3180 Points ∼64% -21%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
21543 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy S7
19944 Points ∼28% -7%
Huawei P10
15341 Points ∼21% -29%
LG G6
22335 Points ∼31% +4%
Apple iPhone 7
15450 Points ∼21% -28%
HTC U Ultra
21263 Points ∼30% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ
20772 Points ∼29% -4%
Lenovo Moto Z
20948 Points ∼29% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
22372 Points ∼31% +4%
OnePlus 3T
22426 Points ∼31% +4%
Google Pixel XL 2016
18222 Points ∼25% -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
36347 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy S7
33348 Points ∼7% -8%
Huawei P10
35964 Points ∼8% -1%
LG G6
32128 Points ∼7% -12%
Apple iPhone 7
63974 Points ∼14% +76%
HTC U Ultra
33446 Points ∼7% -8%
Sony Xperia XZ
32056 Points ∼7% -12%
Lenovo Moto Z
26659 Points ∼6% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
34202 Points ∼8% -6%
OnePlus 3T
34494 Points ∼8% -5%
Google Pixel XL 2016
32652 Points ∼7% -10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
31532 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy S7
29015 Points ∼15% -8%
Huawei P10
27692 Points ∼14% -12%
LG G6
29276 Points ∼15% -7%
Apple iPhone 7
37676 Points ∼19% +19%
HTC U Ultra
29668 Points ∼15% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ
28603 Points ∼15% -9%
Lenovo Moto Z
25135 Points ∼13% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
30606 Points ∼16% -3%
OnePlus 3T
30810 Points ∼16% -2%
Google Pixel XL 2016
27766 Points ∼14% -12%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
121 fps ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy S7
84 fps ∼6% -31%
Huawei P10
69 fps ∼5% -43%
LG G6
75 fps ∼5% -38%
Apple iPhone 7
110.3 fps ∼8% -9%
HTC U Ultra
74 fps ∼5% -39%
Sony Xperia XZ
88 fps ∼6% -27%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps ∼6% -36%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
93 fps ∼7% -23%
OnePlus 3T
91 fps ∼7% -25%
Google Pixel XL 2016
91 fps ∼7% -25%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
60 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy S7
53 fps ∼12% -12%
Huawei P10
55 fps ∼12% -8%
LG G6
46 fps ∼10% -23%
Apple iPhone 7
57.7 fps ∼13% -4%
HTC U Ultra
46 fps ∼10% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ
88 fps ∼19% +47%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps ∼12% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
60 fps ∼13% 0%
OnePlus 3T
59 fps ∼13% -2%
Google Pixel XL 2016
55 fps ∼12% -8%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
62 fps ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy S7
40 fps ∼7% -35%
Huawei P10
30 fps ∼6% -52%
LG G6
38 fps ∼7% -39%
Apple iPhone 7
60.7 fps ∼11% -2%
HTC U Ultra
26 fps ∼5% -58%
Sony Xperia XZ
40 fps ∼7% -35%
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps ∼8% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
49 fps ∼9% -21%
OnePlus 3T
46 fps ∼8% -26%
Google Pixel XL 2016
48 fps ∼9% -23%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
41 fps ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy S7
27 fps ∼7% -34%
Huawei P10
32 fps ∼9% -22%
LG G6
27 fps ∼7% -34%
Apple iPhone 7
58.5 fps ∼16% +43%
HTC U Ultra
23 fps ∼6% -44%
Sony Xperia XZ
39 fps ∼11% -5%
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps ∼7% -37%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
48 fps ∼13% +17%
OnePlus 3T
45 fps ∼12% +10%
Google Pixel XL 2016
30 fps ∼8% -27%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
24 fps ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy S7
28 fps ∼7% +17%
Huawei P10
24 fps ∼6% 0%
LG G6
29 fps ∼7% +21%
Apple iPhone 7
42.2 fps ∼10% +76%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps ∼3% -50%
Sony Xperia XZ
31 fps ∼7% +29%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps ∼6% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
32 fps ∼8% +33%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼8% +33%
Google Pixel XL 2016
32 fps ∼8% +33%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
23 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy S7
15 fps ∼9% -35%
Huawei P10
25 fps ∼14% +9%
LG G6
16 fps ∼9% -30%
Apple iPhone 7
59.4 fps ∼34% +158%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps ∼7% -48%
Sony Xperia XZ
31 fps ∼18% +35%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps ∼9% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
32 fps ∼18% +39%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼18% +39%
Google Pixel XL 2016
17 fps ∼10% -26%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
25 fps ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy S7
15 fps ∼4% -40%
Huawei P10
15 fps ∼4% -40%
LG G6
20 fps ∼6% -20%
HTC U Ultra
15 fps ∼4% -40%
Sony Xperia XZ
20 fps ∼6% -20%
Lenovo Moto Z
16 fps ∼5% -36%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
19 fps ∼5% -24%
OnePlus 3T
20 fps ∼6% -20%
Google Pixel XL 2016
19 fps ∼5% -24%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
13 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S7
7.9 fps ∼0% -39%
Huawei P10
16 fps ∼0% +23%
LG G6
11 fps ∼0% -15%
HTC U Ultra
8.4 fps ∼0% -35%
Sony Xperia XZ
19 fps ∼1% +46%
Lenovo Moto Z
9.8 fps ∼0% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
19 fps ∼1% +46%
OnePlus 3T
20 fps ∼1% +54%
Google Pixel XL 2016
11 fps ∼0% -15%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
5370 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy S7
3550 Points ∼34% -34%
Huawei P10
6206 Points ∼60% +16%
LG G6
5152 Points ∼50% -4%
HTC U Ultra
5217 Points ∼51% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ
5616 Points ∼54% +5%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
6035 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4826 Points ∼56% -20%
Huawei P10
7341 Points ∼86% +22%
LG G6
5703 Points ∼67% -6%
HTC U Ultra
5217 Points ∼61% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ
5058 Points ∼59% -16%
Lenovo Moto Z
7637 Points ∼89% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
5121 Points ∼60% -15%
OnePlus 3T
5664 Points ∼66% -6%
Google Pixel XL 2016
4739 Points ∼55% -21%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
1156 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S7
957 Points ∼56% -17%
Huawei P10
1077 Points ∼64% -7%
LG G6
1073 Points ∼63% -7%
Apple iPhone 7
1531 Points ∼90% +32%
HTC U Ultra
907 Points ∼53% -22%
Sony Xperia XZ
1066 Points ∼63% -8%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points ∼57% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
1020 Points ∼60% -12%
OnePlus 3T
891 Points ∼53% -23%
Google Pixel XL 2016
977 Points ∼58% -15%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
6096 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1723 Points ∼19% -72%
Huawei P10
4115 Points ∼44% -32%
LG G6
5138 Points ∼56% -16%
Apple iPhone 7
6896 Points ∼75% +13%
HTC U Ultra
4591 Points ∼50% -25%
Sony Xperia XZ
4716 Points ∼51% -23%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points ∼47% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
5033 Points ∼54% -17%
OnePlus 3T
4444 Points ∼48% -27%
Google Pixel XL 2016
5017 Points ∼54% -18%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
3039 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2244 Points ∼51% -26%
Huawei P10
2778 Points ∼63% -9%
LG G6
1930 Points ∼44% -36%
Apple iPhone 7
1257 Points ∼28% -59%
HTC U Ultra
1581 Points ∼36% -48%
Sony Xperia XZ
1434 Points ∼32% -53%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼50% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
1740 Points ∼39% -43%
OnePlus 3T
1954 Points ∼44% -36%
Google Pixel XL 2016
1677 Points ∼38% -45%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
5386 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4217 Points ∼41% -22%
Huawei P10
3830 Points ∼37% -29%
LG G6
3646 Points ∼35% -32%
Apple iPhone 7
6097 Points ∼59% +13%
HTC U Ultra
2834 Points ∼28% -47%
Sony Xperia XZ
3047 Points ∼30% -43%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points ∼33% -37%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
3387 Points ∼33% -37%
OnePlus 3T
3130 Points ∼30% -42%
Google Pixel XL 2016
3889 Points ∼38% -28%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
3277 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1987 Points ∼52% -39%
Huawei P10
2621 Points ∼69% -20%
LG G6
2496 Points ∼66% -24%
Apple iPhone 7
2999 Points ∼79% -8%
HTC U Ultra
2078 Points ∼55% -37%
Sony Xperia XZ
2165 Points ∼57% -34%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points ∼62% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
2345 Points ∼62% -28%
OnePlus 3T
2218 Points ∼59% -32%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2378 Points ∼63% -27%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
42183 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S7
30097 Points ∼68% -29%
Huawei P10
37968 Points ∼86% -10%
LG G6
35449 Points ∼80% -16%
Lenovo Moto Z
33028 Points ∼75% -22%
Google Pixel XL 2016
30724 Points ∼70% -27%
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
43852 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S7
40252 Points ∼89% -8%
Huawei P10
43782 Points ∼97% 0%
LG G6
37621 Points ∼84% -14%
Lenovo Moto Z
41445 Points ∼92% -5%
Google Pixel XL 2016
34695 Points ∼77% -21%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
1276 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S7
732 Points ∼39% -43%
Huawei P10
664 Points ∼35% -48%
LG G6
647 Points ∼35% -49%
Apple iPhone 7
1059 Points ∼57% -17%
Lenovo Moto Z
542 Points ∼29% -58%
Google Pixel XL 2016
621 Points ∼33% -51%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
30.64 fps ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S7
13.86 fps ∼36% -55%
Huawei P10
23.56 fps ∼61% -23%
LG G6
24.34 fps ∼63% -21%
Lenovo Moto Z
24.33 fps ∼63% -21%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Google Pixel XL 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
194 Points ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy S7
166 Points ∼22% -14%
Huawei P10
136 Points ∼18% -30%
LG G6
122 Points ∼16% -37%
Apple iPhone 7
202 Points ∼27% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ
90 Points ∼12% -54%
Lenovo Moto Z
112 Points ∼15% -42%
OnePlus 3T
135 Points ∼18% -30%
Google Pixel XL 2016
126 Points ∼17% -35%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
12941 Points ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy S7
13161 Points ∼27% +2%
Huawei P10
10236 Points ∼21% -21%
LG G6
9113 Points ∼18% -30%
Apple iPhone 7
24875 Points ∼50% +92%
HTC U Ultra
5511 Points ∼11% -57%
Sony Xperia XZ
9069 Points ∼18% -30%
Lenovo Moto Z
7771 Points ∼16% -40%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
9378 Points ∼19% -28%
OnePlus 3T
9798 Points ∼20% -24%
Google Pixel XL 2016
8690 Points ∼18% -33%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
1886.6 ms * ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2561.5 ms * ∼4% -36%
Huawei P10
3128.7 ms * ∼5% -66%
LG G6
2464.2 ms * ∼4% -31%
Apple iPhone 7
1113.4 ms * ∼2% +41%
HTC U Ultra
4141 ms * ∼7% -119%
Sony Xperia XZ
2768 ms * ∼5% -47%
Lenovo Moto Z
3154.7 ms * ∼5% -67%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
2580.2 ms * ∼4% -37%
OnePlus 3T
2719.3 ms * ∼5% -44%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2653.6 ms * ∼4% -41%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
65.846 Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S7
74 Points ∼0% +12%
Huawei P10
57.9 Points ∼0% -12%
LG G6
56.628 Points ∼0% -14%
Apple iPhone 7
165.86 Points ∼0% +152%
HTC U Ultra
45.084 Points ∼0% -32%
Sony Xperia XZ
54.201 Points ∼0% -18%
Lenovo Moto Z
47.5 Points ∼0% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
57 Points ∼0% -13%
OnePlus 3T
54.526 Points ∼0% -17%
Google Pixel XL 2016
55.4 Points ∼0% -16%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy S8Samsung Galaxy S7Huawei P10LG G6HTC U UltraSony Xperia XZLenovo Moto ZOnePlus 3TXiaomi Mi 5sGoogle Pixel XL 2016
AndroBench 3-5
-13%
145%
-13%
-8%
-44%
56%
82%
-23%
-40%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
53.5
53.6
0%
32.19
-40%
53.33
0%
67.6
26%
29.8
-44%
45.64
-15%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
63.9
72.33
13%
54.22
-15%
77.61
21%
82.8
30%
33.5
-48%
78.51
23%
Random Write 4KB
15.25
16.01
5%
152.31
899%
16.58
9%
13.7
-10%
10.5
-31%
74.93
391%
74.39
388%
15.08
-1%
14.56
-5%
Random Read 4KB
127.17
85.9
-32%
168.42
32%
95.19
-25%
84.2
-34%
71.5
-44%
117.15
-8%
123.57
-3%
100.35
-21%
87.67
-31%
Sequential Write 256KB
193.23
145.72
-25%
189.83
-2%
122.85
-36%
164.7
-15%
138
-29%
168.32
-13%
165.3
-14%
153.47
-21%
83.38
-57%
Sequential Read 256KB
792.86
483.82
-39%
737.65
-7%
428.67
-46%
423.9
-47%
281
-65%
439.66
-45%
436.43
-45%
412.7
-48%
258.23
-67%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high29 fps
 very low30 fps
Temple Run 2
 SettingsValue
 default60 fps
Temple Run 2
 SettingsValue
 default60 fps
Max. Load
 35 °C36.7 °C34.2 °C 
 34.7 °C35.4 °C34.5 °C 
 34.2 °C34.4 °C34.1 °C 
Maximum: 36.7 °C
Average: 34.8 °C
35.2 °C37.5 °C32.8 °C
34.5 °C36.2 °C32.1 °C
33.9 °C35.4 °C32.7 °C
Maximum: 37.5 °C
Average: 34.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  30.6 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.12525.433.53125.334.84032.9345033.629.46331.629.68028.424.91002731.212520.834.71602239.820021.348.325020.855.331521.259.540019.462.250019.567.163017.77080017.973.6100017.874.2125017.373.2160017.472.7200016.773.2250017.272.1315018.269.7400017.969500017.666.3630017.766.9800017.8671000017.951.61250018.145.21600018.247.7SPL3082.4N1.354.8median 17.9Samsung Galaxy S8median 66.9Delta1.311.831.63725.434.125.333.632.932.533.630.531.631.828.428.42724.920.829.62242.221.352.620.859.721.260.419.459.919.56217.766.617.96717.866.117.368.117.468.816.771.617.271.618.270.417.970.317.667.917.762.217.856.717.953.518.15118.238.13080.41.345.9median 17.9LG G6median 621.3931.639.925.439.825.339.732.934.733.634.731.632.728.427.82726.420.828.62241.521.350.520.855.921.260.319.46519.568.617.766.817.964.417.866.917.371.517.473.516.774.517.273.718.272.217.970.517.670.717.764.817.860.417.95918.148.418.232.83082.71.352.3median 17.9Huawei P10median 64.81.310.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Samsung Galaxy S8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.44 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

LG G6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.35 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei P10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.14 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.78 / 1.1 / 1.16 Watt
Load midlight 4.15 / 5.12 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Apple iPhone 7
1960 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 5s
3200 mAh
Power Consumption
-6%
-35%
-65%
-5%
-54%
-36%
Idle Minimum *
0.78
0.68
13%
0.62
21%
0.83
-6%
0.54
31%
0.61
22%
0.4
49%
Idle Average *
1.1
1.02
7%
1.43
-30%
2.1
-91%
1.51
-37%
1.77
-61%
1.7
-55%
Idle Maximum *
1.16
1.14
2%
1.48
-28%
2.18
-88%
1.54
-33%
1.81
-56%
1.81
-56%
Load Average *
4.15
4.73
-14%
5.52
-33%
6.57
-58%
3.75
10%
6.67
-61%
5.84
-41%
Load Maximum *
5.12
7.16
-40%
10.47
-104%
9.32
-82%
5.01
2%
10.98
-114%
9.12
-78%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
27h 47min
WiFi Surfing v1.3
11h 59min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 51min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 24min
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 battery life
Huawei Mate 9
677 min ∼100% +28%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
533 min ∼79% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
527 min ∼78%
Sony Xperia XZ
482 min ∼71% -9%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
481 min ∼71% -9%
HTC 10
387 min ∼57% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S7
371 min ∼55% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
HTC U Ultra
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-5%
-5%
-0%
-8%
-12%
-18%
Reader / Idle
1667
1810
9%
1835
10%
1789
7%
1540
-8%
1371
-18%
1568
-6%
H.264
771
892
16%
813
5%
779
1%
582
-25%
724
-6%
605
-22%
WiFi v1.3
719
456
-37%
587
-18%
692
-4%
966
34%
407
-43%
546
-24%
Load
264
242
-8%
225
-15%
252
-5%
176
-33%
320
21%
214
-19%

Pros

+ 优秀的屏幕
+ 时尚的设计
+ 快速的SoC
+ 非常好的定位能力
+ 快速Wi-Fi
+ 千兆LTE
+ 优秀的通话质量
+ 坚实的传感器配置
+ USB 3.1与DP,HDMI和OTG
+ 良好的续航
+ 快速充电和无线充电
+ 防水防尘
+ 非常好的摄像头...

Cons

- ...没有比上一代好太多
- 没有双SIM卡
- 指纹扫描器难以通过触摸找到
- SoC在持续负载下节流
- 保修不包括液体造成的损坏
In review: Samsung Galaxy S8
In review: Samsung Galaxy S8

凭借其Galaxy S8,三星创造了一个优秀的产品,甚至比其较大的Galaxy S8 +姐妹机型更好一些。这与S7产品线是不同的,然而Plus型号不能利用其较大的电池,并且更重。 此外,指纹扫描仪的位置由于其尺寸问题而不能达到一定舒适度。因此,当不需要较大屏幕时,可以节省100欧元(〜110美元)的额外费用。
该智能手机拥有时尚的设计和新无边框显示屏。再现了准确的色彩,亮度高和反射少,这也是Galaxy S8的明显优点。另外,配备了新的可以提升性能的SoC,还安装了一个千兆位LTE模块。不过,三星不为该机提供双SIM卡的机型,实在太糟糕了。

尽管如此,三星Galaxy S8还是得接受一些批评,即使它是一款出色的智能手机。

多样化的安全功能也是一个很强的加分点,但是智能手机不应该使用脸部识别,因为这种方法太容易被蒙混过关。不幸的是,个人助理Bixby还不完整,不能让我们信服。
我们希望三星给消费者更多的自由。例如,128 GB型号(6 GB 内存)在欧洲无法获取,另外,如果客户不在亚洲,客户将无法选择所有可用的颜色。
然而,三星已经很好地升级了其高级智能手机为Galaxy S8,它拥有时尚的设计,一个超级棒的相机,非常好的电池续航时间和一个优秀的屏幕。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Samsung Galaxy S8 - 05/03/2017 v6
Marcus Herbrich, Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
93%
Keyboard
72 / 75 → 96%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
69 / 60 → 100%
Weight
92%
Battery
94%
Display
91%
Games Performance
64 / 63 → 100%
Application Performance
66 / 70 → 95%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
71 / 91 → 78%
Camera
94%
Average
84%
92%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星 Galaxy S8 智能手机简短评测
Marcus Herbrich, Daniel Schmidt, 2017-05-14 (Update: 2017-05-23)