Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy M23评论 - 三星的廉价手机获得5G和120赫兹

回到IPS。 三星终于通过Galaxy M23向5G迈出了一步,但AMOLED屏幕已经被放弃。韩国人是落后于市场,还是再次打造了一款体面而廉价的中档手机?我们将在评论中找到答案。
Android ARM Smartphone
Samsung Galaxy M23 (Galaxy M Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 570 (Cortex-A77/A55)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixel 400 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 113 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, dedicated, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n78) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 165.5 x 77
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 25W charging (Samsung AFC)
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​30fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.2, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, USB cable, SIM tool, Android 12, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.775W/​kg (head), 1.091W/​kg (body), fanless
Weight
198 g
Price
289 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81.1 %
06/2022
Samsung Galaxy M23
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
198 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2408x1080
79.8 %
01/2021
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
193 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"1600x720
79 %
12/2021
Samsung Galaxy M22
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
186 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.40"1600x720
80.2 %
05/2022
realme 9 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
191 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2412x1080

外壳和功能 - 亚光和坚固的底盘

Galaxy M系列应该比Galaxy A系列提供更多的价格,但并不是在所有的零售商那里都有。Galaxy M23是该系列中一款廉价的中档手机。前代产品 Galaxy M22因许多妥协而引人注目,例如,没有包括5G,也没有录制4K视频的选项。

2022年机型的外壳发生了很大变化:少了一个镜头,但相机模块现在明显突出于外壳。背面是磨砂的,没有像前代那样有触觉上的明显图案。颜色的选择非常有趣,有铜色的橙铜色或非常明亮的浅蓝色。我们的测试设备采用的是深绿色,看起来很有品位。

Galaxy M23比它的前代产品要重得多,也大得多,但它的手感不错。前面的玻璃因其稳定性而令人信服,不允许压力进入显示屏。扭转时,液晶上会出现压痕,但外壳看起来相当耐用,总体来说质量不错。

4GB的工作内存是这个价格范围内的标准,128GB的大容量存储也是如此。microSD插槽是独立的,所以它可以同时使用2张SIM卡。在我们的复制测试中,它的工作速度很好,在合成存储基准中,它处于一个不错的水平。

三星Galaxy M23
三星Galaxy M23
三星Galaxy M23
三星Galaxy M23
三星Galaxy M23
三星Galaxy M23
三星Galaxy M23

尺寸比较

165.5 mm 77 mm 8.4 mm 198 g164.4 mm 75.9 mm 8.6 mm 193 g164.3 mm 75.6 mm 8.5 mm 191 g159.9 mm 74 mm 8.4 mm 186 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy M23
  (Angelbird V60)
36.6 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.9 - 59.2, n=85, last 2 years)
26.5 MB/s ∼72% -28%
realme 9 5G
  (Angelbird V60)
26.3 MB/s ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy M22
  (Angelbird V60)
24 MB/s ∼66% -34%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M23 Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø35.2 (23.8-44.8)
Samsung Galaxy M22 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø31.6 (25.8-40.4)
realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.1 (26.6-49.6)
Samsung Galaxy M23 Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø59.1 (49.8-63.4)
Samsung Galaxy M22 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø54.3 (1.78-65.4)
realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.6 (34.7-88)

通信、软件和操作 - 很少有更新

最后,Galaxy M23还具有5G功能,我们非常想念前代产品中的快速移动标准。此外,还有一些4G频率,所以你在国外旅行时也可以更放心地使用移动互联网。

WiFi 5已经上岗。在我们与参考路由器华硕GT-AXE11000的测试中,传输速率达到了同类水平。

在测试过程中,我们时不时地随机检查智能手机的接收质量,并与同一地点的其他智能手机进行比较。Galaxy M23在这里做得相当好,可以可靠地接入4G网络,但往往比高端手机的接收效果差一格。

三星不保证廉价的Galaxy M设备的软件更新,每3个月才发布一个安全补丁。目前,Galaxy M23安装了Android 12和OneUI 4.1,安全更新是2022年3月的,因此需要尽快刷新。

120赫兹的屏幕使手机操作流畅,触摸屏对输入的反应非常准确和迅速。指纹传感器位于外壳右侧的待机按钮中。即使屏幕关闭,它也能保持激活状态,并可靠地解锁系统,几乎没有延迟。通过面部识别解锁也是可能的,但由于是纯软件解决方案,相对不安全,因此不能用于解锁网上银行应用程序,例如。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy M22
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
349 (324min - 355max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
328 (323min - 332max) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
329 (307min - 340max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy M22
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
328 (292min - 342max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy M23
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
363 (341min - 377max) MBit/s ∼100%
realme 9 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
362 (329min - 376max) MBit/s ∼100% 0%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
realme 9 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
341 (330min - 352max) MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M23
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
340 (323min - 348max) MBit/s ∼100%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø339 (323-348)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø363 (341-377)

照相机 -Galaxy 具有5000万像素的照相机

前置摄像头样本
前置摄像头样本

在三星的Galaxy M23中,一个具有5000万像素的高分辨率摄像头被用作主摄像头。它默认以1200万像素拍摄照片,因此它将4个像素作为一个像素,从而提高了感光度

HDR照片的效果很好,图像的清晰度总体上可以更高,较大的区域显示出清晰的像素图案。在弱光下,增亮效果还不错,一些细节仍能被识别。

广角摄像头拍出的快照还算不错,但这里的细节几乎看不出来,质量太低了。对边缘变形的修正也相当平庸。不可能在两个镜头之间连续变焦,只能直接切换。像前代产品中的微距镜头不再可用。

现在可以用主摄像头以30帧的速度录制4K视频。即使在光线较暗的情况下,记录仍然是令人信服的,图像噪音相对较低。我们也喜欢自动对焦和曝光补偿的性能。

自拍相机可以拍出相当好的照片,可以放大一些而不损失太多细节。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow LightWide angle
click to load images
ColorChecker
15.5 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
12 ∆E
10 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M23: 11.11 ∆E min: 3.17 - max: 17.45 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
61.9 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
29 ∆E
64.2 ∆E
63.5 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.4 ∆E
74 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
42 ∆E
80.9 ∆E
69.4 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M23: 46.13 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 80.86 ∆E

显示器 - IPS而不是OLED?这里有一个很好的选择

子像素结构
子像素结构

在M22中是否有轻微的偏蓝现象? Galaxy M22AMOLED屏幕,Galaxy M23不得不使用IPS屏幕。高的最大亮度,快速的120赫兹,没有PWM闪烁,以及全高清分辨率,使显示技术的改变显得相当合理。

因此,你必须忍受较低的对比度,色彩还原的准确性也只是良好,而不是像前代产品那样非常好。此外,Galaxy M23的屏幕在颜色和灰度上有轻微的偏蓝。

540
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
482
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
548
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 551 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 525 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 551 cd/m²
Contrast: 1378:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.57 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.31
Samsung Galaxy M23
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
AMOLED, 1600x720, 6.60
Samsung Galaxy M22
Super AMOLED, 1600x720, 6.40
realme 9 5G
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.60
Response Times
66%
71%
-8%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
36 ?(17, 19)
10 ?(5, 5)
72%
8 ?(5, 3)
78%
48 ?(23, 25)
-33%
Response Time Black / White *
22 ?(7, 15)
9 ?(5, 4)
59%
8 ?(5, 3)
64%
18 ?(7, 11)
18%
PWM Frequency
242.7
123.2
Screen
16%
32%
-8%
Brightness middle
551
466
-15%
539
-2%
589
7%
Brightness
525
462
-12%
542
3%
561
7%
Brightness Distribution
87
85
-2%
95
9%
90
3%
Black Level *
0.4
0.5
-25%
Contrast
1378
1178
-15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.57
2.06
55%
1.21
74%
4.33
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.56
6.14
6%
4.17
36%
8.39
-28%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.1
1.8
65%
1.5
71%
5.9
-16%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.105 105%
2.179 101%
2.063 107%
CCT
7750 84%
6444 101%
6653 98%
8021 81%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
41% / 29%
52% / 42%
-8% / -8%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (36.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21751 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 功率和耐力尚可

这款手机 高通骁龙750G 5G作为低价位智能手机的SoC是一个不错的选择。虽然它有点老,但它提供了一流的性能率,并在大多数日常情况下实现了流畅的系统运行。

乍一看,一些图形基准测试似乎非常类似于 Galaxy M22并产生非常相似的速率。一方面,人们不应忘记,Galaxy M23默认以更高的分辨率进行渲染,因此这里的性能肯定更高,而且画质也更好。另一方面,在部分以固定分辨率渲染的屏幕外测试中,其性能明显低于 Galaxy A42 5G同样的SoC。

安装在Galaxy M23中的快速UFS内存有助于推动系统性能的提升。它减少了等待时间,例如在加载期间。

当系统处于负载状态时,智能手机可能会大幅升温,特别是左上角区域。然而,这些比率仍在正常范围内。

下部边缘的单声道扬声器听起来相当不错,也可以变得相当响亮,最高可达89.3 dB(A)。还有一个3.5毫米的耳机连接插孔和蓝牙5.0。然而,与许多三星手机一样,在无线连接方面缺少对最新aptX编解码器的访问。

与前代产品一样,Galaxy M23可以用最大25瓦的功率充电,但不再包括充电器。鉴于三星只为前代产品配备了一个弱小的15瓦的充电器,这还不算太坏。然而,与前代产品相比,电池运行时间要弱得多,这可能是由于屏幕的分辨率更高,刷新率更高。然而,这款手机的耐力一点也不差,在我们的WLAN测试中达到16:44分钟。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
643 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
658 Points ∼95% +2%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
373 Points ∼54% -42%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
692 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (632 - 658, n=8)
647 Points ∼93% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=253, last 2 years)
673 Points ∼97% +5%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1846 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1979 Points ∼90% +7%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1355 Points ∼62% -27%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1914 Points ∼87% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (1792 - 2009, n=8)
1904 Points ∼87% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=253, last 2 years)
2201 Points ∼100% +19%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
9800 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6172 Points ∼61% -37%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
9776 Points ∼96% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (8035 - 9800, n=4)
8801 Points ∼86% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=148, last 2 years)
10178 Points ∼100% +4%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1757 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2828 Points ∼96% +61%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1351 Points ∼46% -23%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2949 Points ∼100% +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (1757 - 2828, n=8)
2644 Points ∼90% +50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=179, last 2 years)
2536 Points ∼86% +44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1593 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2667 Points ∼94% +67%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1195 Points ∼42% -25%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2831 Points ∼100% +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (1593 - 2667, n=8)
2478 Points ∼88% +56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=179, last 2 years)
2636 Points ∼93% +65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2749 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3588 Points ∼100% +31%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2487 Points ∼69% -10%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3455 Points ∼96% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (2749 - 3588, n=8)
3390 Points ∼94% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=179, last 2 years)
2861 Points ∼80% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2910 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2990 Points ∼74% +3%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1368 Points ∼34% -53%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3098 Points ∼77% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (2910 - 2990, n=8)
2947 Points ∼73% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11528, n=231, last 2 years)
4034 Points ∼100% +39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2760 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2845 Points ∼57% +3%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1202 Points ∼24% -56%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3008 Points ∼60% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (2738 - 2845, n=8)
2793 Points ∼56% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 19364, n=231, last 2 years)
5031 Points ∼100% +82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3595 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3636 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2644 Points ∼73% -26%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3462 Points ∼95% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (3452 - 3659, n=8)
3570 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=231, last 2 years)
3245 Points ∼89% -10%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
644 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
689 Points ∼22% +7%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1197 Points ∼38% +86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (644 - 3658, n=7)
1406 Points ∼44% +118%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=184, last 2 years)
3182 Points ∼100% +394%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
635 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
685 Points ∼20% +8%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1197 Points ∼35% +89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (635 - 1119, n=7)
1036 Points ∼31% +63%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 11700, n=185, last 2 years)
3377 Points ∼100% +432%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
193 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
176 Points ∼18% -9%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
356 Points ∼36% +84%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (193 - 340, n=4)
300 Points ∼30% +55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 3080, n=140, last 2 years)
984 Points ∼100% +410%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
189 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
173 Points ∼18% -8%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
352 Points ∼36% +86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (189 - 334, n=4)
296 Points ∼30% +57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=136, last 2 years)
971 Points ∼100% +414%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7.1 fps ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +365%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
17 fps ∼52% +139%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
19 fps ∼58% +168%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (7.1 - 33, n=8)
17.3 fps ∼52% +144%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 98, n=249, last 2 years)
28.8 fps ∼87% +306%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
17 fps ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
20 fps ∼59% +18%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.2 fps ∼27% -46%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
21 fps ∼62% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (17 - 20, n=8)
19.4 fps ∼57% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 123, n=250, last 2 years)
34.1 fps ∼100% +101%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
11 fps ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
21 fps ∼100% +91%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.8 fps ∼47% -11%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
12 fps ∼57% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (6.7 - 21, n=8)
11.7 fps ∼56% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=250, last 2 years)
19.9 fps ∼95% +81%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3.3 fps ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7.4 fps ∼57% +124%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.3 fps ∼25% 0%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7.8 fps ∼60% +136%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (3.3 - 7.6, n=8)
6.9 fps ∼53% +109%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 47, n=250, last 2 years)
13 fps ∼100% +294%
Samsung Galaxy M23Samsung Galaxy A42 5GSamsung Galaxy M22realme 9 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-7%
-60%
-55%
-27%
-6%
Sequential Read 256KB
867.2
963
11%
292
-66%
511
-41%
772 ?(427 - 1011, n=100)
-11%
934 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=246, last 2 years)
8%
Sequential Write 256KB
500.3
476
-5%
187.8
-62%
120.6
-76%
286 ?(13.6 - 719, n=100)
-43%
474 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=246, last 2 years)
-5%
Random Read 4KB
187.9
168.5
-10%
99.7
-47%
88.5
-53%
149.4 ?(92.6 - 239, n=100)
-20%
167.1 ?(13.5 - 345, n=246, last 2 years)
-11%
Random Write 4KB
189.5
147.7
-22%
70.2
-63%
95.4
-50%
128.4 ?(18.2 - 290, n=100)
-32%
160.5 ?(56.5 - 458, n=247, last 2 years)
-15%

温度

Max. Load
 39 °C37.1 °C32.9 °C 
 42.9 °C36.7 °C33.3 °C 
 42.8 °C37.1 °C33.6 °C 
Maximum: 42.9 °C
Average: 35.6 °C
34.2 °C38.1 °C42.4 °C
34.4 °C37.9 °C44.2 °C
35 °C38.6 °C43.8 °C
Maximum: 44.2 °C
Average: 38.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热力图前线
热力图前线
热图 背面
热图 背面

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.239.42533.932.2312728.94032.432.3503632.36330.9268019.42210019.922.712515.524.816015.937.120012.342.225012.947.931512.952.94009.957.450010.262.263013.463.98001773.6100014.278.9125012.878.7160011.782.4200010.281.3250011.67731501379.840001574.450001661.9630014.656.6800015.269.71000015.9711250016.360.31600016.659.8SPL26.289.3N0.769.4median 14.2median 62.2Delta1.912.45337.544.542.533.73533.435.535.839.230.131.621.3252124.516.321.814.731.412.94114.348.51351.310.856.412.363.913.56619.5701576.414.176.214.973.411.970.612.866.515.46316.569.416.776.217.2741866.817.96517.667.918.350.92884.10.956.2median 15median 662.110hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy M23realme 9 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy M23 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 11.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

realme 9 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

Samsung Galaxy M23
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M22
5000 mAh
realme 9 5G
5000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
1004
967
-4%
1126
12%
1029
2%
907 ?(438 - 1953, n=255, last 2 years)
-10%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
16h 44min

Pros

+ 明亮、高分辨率的屏幕
+ 无PWM
+ 快速的UFS内存
+ 体面的相机系统
+ 电池寿命长
+ 5G

Cons

- 只有很少的软件更新
- 负载下明显发热
- 缺少现代aptX编解码器

结论 - 一个成功的升级

在审查中。三星Galaxy M23。
在审查中。三星Galaxy M23。

虽然IPS屏幕乍听起来比前代的AMOLED显示屏要退步,但也有一些优势,特别是对于廉价手机。由于采用了更便宜的IPS面板,三星设法提高了分辨率和帧率。此外,对一些人来说很讨厌的PWM闪烁被消除了,而且你不必在最大亮度方面做出任何让步。

当然,那些喜欢AMOLED面板的均匀照明和高对比度的人在Galaxy M23上得到的东西会少一点,但总的来说,与前代产品相比,这款手机似乎是一个更全面的包装:现在有5G,可以录制4K视频,还有更快的内存。

三星的Galaxy M23没有OLED和PWM,但有5G和快速内存。在我们眼中,这不是一个糟糕的交换。

然而,Galaxy M23仍然有一个平庸的更新周期,在负载下有明显的温度上升。也没有微距镜头了,这有点降低了相机系统的灵活性。电池运行时间不如前代产品,但仍处于较高的水平。

如果应该是OLED显示屏,毕竟钱不多,那么前辈 Galaxy M22,的 摩托罗拉Moto G41,或 Redmi Note 11可以被看作是替代品,但这三个都只是4G手机。更多的力量可在 小米Poco M4 Pro,它具有5G功能,但也不得不不使用OLED面板。

价格和可用性

直接来自制造商279欧元的Galaxy 手机。在互联网上,三星Galaxy M23在测试时的价格已经低得多,起价约为222欧元。我们的合作商店notebooksbilliger.deamazon.de也有一款智能手机在出售。

Samsung Galaxy M23 - 06/06/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
49 / 70 → 70%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
85%
Games Performance
35 / 64 → 54%
Application Performance
65 / 86 → 76%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
68 / 90 → 76%
Camera
62%
Average
75%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy M23评论 - 三星的廉价手机获得5G和120赫兹
Florian Schmitt, 2022-06- 9 (Update: 2022-06- 9)