Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar三星Galaxy M23评论 - 三星的廉价手机获得5G和120赫兹
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81.1 % | 06/2022 | Samsung Galaxy M23 SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619 | 198 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
| 80.1 % | 01/2021 | Samsung Galaxy A42 5G SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619 | 193 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.60" | 1600x720 | |
| 79.2 % | 12/2021 | Samsung Galaxy M22 Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2 | 186 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 1600x720 | |
| 80.2 % | 05/2022 | Realme 9 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 191 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2412x1080 |
外壳和功能 - 亚光和坚固的底盘
Galaxy M系列应该比Galaxy A系列提供更多的价格，但并不是在所有的零售商那里都有。Galaxy M23是该系列中一款廉价的中档手机。前代产品 Galaxy M22因许多妥协而引人注目，例如，没有包括5G，也没有录制4K视频的选项。
2022年机型的外壳发生了很大变化：少了一个镜头，但相机模块现在明显突出于外壳。背面是磨砂的，没有像前代那样有触觉上的明显图案。颜色的选择非常有趣，有铜色的橙铜色或非常明亮的浅蓝色。我们的测试设备采用的是深绿色，看起来很有品位。
Galaxy M23比它的前代产品要重得多，也大得多，但它的手感不错。前面的玻璃因其稳定性而令人信服，不允许压力进入显示屏。扭转时，液晶上会出现压痕，但外壳看起来相当耐用，总体来说质量不错。
4GB的工作内存是这个价格范围内的标准，128GB的大容量存储也是如此。microSD插槽是独立的，所以它可以同时使用2张SIM卡。在我们的复制测试中，它的工作速度很好，在合成存储基准中，它处于一个不错的水平。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M23 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (10.9 - 77, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Realme 9 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M22 (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 很少有更新
最后，Galaxy M23还具有5G功能，我们非常想念前代产品中的快速移动标准。此外，还有一些4G频率，所以你在国外旅行时也可以更放心地使用移动互联网。
WiFi 5已经上岗。在我们与参考路由器华硕GT-AXE11000的测试中，传输速率达到了同类水平。
在测试过程中，我们时不时地随机检查智能手机的接收质量，并与同一地点的其他智能手机进行比较。Galaxy M23在这里做得相当好，可以可靠地接入4G网络，但往往比高端手机的接收效果差一格。
三星不保证廉价的Galaxy M设备的软件更新，每3个月才发布一个安全补丁。目前，Galaxy M23安装了Android 12和OneUI 4.1，安全更新是2022年3月的，因此需要尽快刷新。
120赫兹的屏幕使手机操作流畅，触摸屏对输入的反应非常准确和迅速。指纹传感器位于外壳右侧的待机按钮中。即使屏幕关闭，它也能保持激活状态，并可靠地解锁系统，几乎没有延迟。通过面部识别解锁也是可能的，但由于是纯软件解决方案，相对不安全，因此不能用于解锁网上银行应用程序，例如。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy M22 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A42 5G | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A42 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy M22 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy M23 | |
| Realme 9 5G | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Realme 9 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy M23 | |
照相机 -Galaxy 具有5000万像素的照相机
在三星的Galaxy M23中，一个具有5000万像素的高分辨率摄像头被用作主摄像头。它默认以1200万像素拍摄照片，因此它将4个像素作为一个像素，从而提高了感光度
HDR照片的效果很好，图像的清晰度总体上可以更高，较大的区域显示出清晰的像素图案。在弱光下，增亮效果还不错，一些细节仍能被识别。
广角摄像头拍出的快照还算不错，但这里的细节几乎看不出来，质量太低了。对边缘变形的修正也相当平庸。不可能在两个镜头之间连续变焦，只能直接切换。像前代产品中的微距镜头不再可用。
现在可以用主摄像头以30帧的速度录制4K视频。即使在光线较暗的情况下，记录仍然是令人信服的，图像噪音相对较低。我们也喜欢自动对焦和曝光补偿的性能。
自拍相机可以拍出相当好的照片，可以放大一些而不损失太多细节。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow LightWide angle
显示器 - IPS而不是OLED？这里有一个很好的选择
在M22中是否有轻微的偏蓝现象？ Galaxy M22AMOLED屏幕，Galaxy M23不得不使用IPS屏幕。高的最大亮度，快速的120赫兹，没有PWM闪烁，以及全高清分辨率，使显示技术的改变显得相当合理。
因此，你必须忍受较低的对比度，色彩还原的准确性也只是良好，而不是像前代产品那样非常好。此外，Galaxy M23的屏幕在颜色和灰度上有轻微的偏蓝。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 551 cd/m²
Contrast: 1378:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.57 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.31
| Samsung Galaxy M23 IPS, 2408x1080, 6.60 | Samsung Galaxy A42 5G AMOLED, 1600x720, 6.60 | Samsung Galaxy M22 Super AMOLED, 1600x720, 6.40 | Realme 9 5G IPS, 2412x1080, 6.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 66% | 71% | -8% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36 ? | 10 ? 72% | 8 ? 78% | 48 ? -33% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 22 ? | 9 ? 59% | 8 ? 64% | 18 ? 18% |
| PWM Frequency | 242.7 | 123.2 | ||
| Screen | 16% | 32% | -8% | |
| Brightness middle | 551 | 466 -15% | 539 -2% | 589 7% |
| Brightness | 525 | 462 -12% | 542 3% | 561 7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 85 -2% | 95 9% | 90 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.5 -25% | ||
| Contrast | 1378 | 1178 -15% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.57 | 2.06 55% | 1.21 74% | 4.33 5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.56 | 6.14 6% | 4.17 36% | 8.39 -28% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.1 | 1.8 65% | 1.5 71% | 5.9 -16% |
| Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.105 105% | 2.179 101% | 2.063 107% |
| CCT | 7750 84% | 6444 101% | 6653 98% | 8021 81% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 41% /
29% | 52% /
42% | -8% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 功率和耐力尚可
这款手机 高通骁龙750G 5G作为低价位智能手机的SoC是一个不错的选择。虽然它有点老，但它提供了一流的性能率，并在大多数日常情况下实现了流畅的系统运行。
乍一看，一些图形基准测试似乎非常类似于 Galaxy M22并产生非常相似的速率。一方面，人们不应忘记，Galaxy M23默认以更高的分辨率进行渲染，因此这里的性能肯定更高，而且画质也更好。另一方面，在部分以固定分辨率渲染的屏幕外测试中，其性能明显低于 Galaxy A42 5G同样的SoC。
安装在Galaxy M23中的快速UFS内存有助于推动系统性能的提升。它减少了等待时间，例如在加载期间。
当系统处于负载状态时，智能手机可能会大幅升温，特别是左上角区域。然而，这些比率仍在正常范围内。
下部边缘的单声道扬声器听起来相当不错，也可以变得相当响亮，最高可达89.3 dB(A)。还有一个3.5毫米的耳机连接插孔和蓝牙5.0。然而，与许多三星手机一样，在无线连接方面缺少对最新aptX编解码器的访问。
与前代产品一样，Galaxy M23可以用最大25瓦的功率充电，但不再包括充电器。鉴于三星只为前代产品配备了一个弱小的15瓦的充电器，这还不算太坏。然而，与前代产品相比，电池运行时间要弱得多，这可能是由于屏幕的分辨率更高，刷新率更高。然而，这款手机的耐力一点也不差，在我们的WLAN测试中达到16:44分钟。
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M23 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A42 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy M22 | |
| Realme 9 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (7.1 - 33, n=9) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M23 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A42 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy M22 | |
| Realme 9 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (17 - 20, n=9) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M23 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A42 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy M22 | |
| Realme 9 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (6.7 - 21, n=9) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 118, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M23 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A42 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy M22 | |
| Realme 9 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (3.3 - 7.6, n=9) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M23 | Samsung Galaxy A42 5G | Samsung Galaxy M22 | Realme 9 5G | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -7% | -60% | -55% | -26% | 68% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 867.2 | 963 11% | 292 -66% | 511 -41% | 760 ? -12% | 1505 ? 74% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 500.3 | 476 -5% | 187.8 -62% | 120.6 -76% | 297 ? -41% | 1112 ? 122% |
| Random Read 4KB | 187.9 | 168.5 -10% | 99.7 -47% | 88.5 -53% | 152.9 ? -19% | 247 ? 31% |
| Random Write 4KB | 189.5 | 147.7 -22% | 70.2 -63% | 95.4 -50% | 131.6 ? -31% | 271 ? 43% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Samsung Galaxy M23 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Realme 9 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Samsung Galaxy M23 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A42 5G 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy M22 5000 mAh | Realme 9 5G 5000 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 1004 | 967 -4% | 1126 12% | 1029 2% | 913 ? -9% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 一个成功的升级
虽然IPS屏幕乍听起来比前代的AMOLED显示屏要退步，但也有一些优势，特别是对于廉价手机。由于采用了更便宜的IPS面板，三星设法提高了分辨率和帧率。此外，对一些人来说很讨厌的PWM闪烁被消除了，而且你不必在最大亮度方面做出任何让步。
当然，那些喜欢AMOLED面板的均匀照明和高对比度的人在Galaxy M23上得到的东西会少一点，但总的来说，与前代产品相比，这款手机似乎是一个更全面的包装：现在有5G，可以录制4K视频，还有更快的内存。
三星的Galaxy M23没有OLED和PWM，但有5G和快速内存。在我们眼中，这不是一个糟糕的交换。
然而，Galaxy M23仍然有一个平庸的更新周期，在负载下有明显的温度上升。也没有微距镜头了，这有点降低了相机系统的灵活性。电池运行时间不如前代产品，但仍处于较高的水平。
如果应该是OLED显示屏，毕竟钱不多，那么前辈 Galaxy M22,的 摩托罗拉Moto G41，或 Redmi Note 11可以被看作是替代品，但这三个都只是4G手机。更多的力量可在 小米Poco M4 Pro，它具有5G功能，但也不得不不使用OLED面板。
价格和可用性
直接来自制造商279欧元的Galaxy 手机。在互联网上，三星Galaxy M23在测试时的价格已经低得多，起价约为222欧元。我们的合作商店notebooksbilliger.de和amazon.de也有一款智能手机在出售。
Samsung Galaxy M23
-
06/06/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt
Pricecompare
