Notebookcheck

三星Galaxy M52 5G评测 - 一款强大的120Hz智能手机,注定要失败?

在负担得起的中档产品中,超过1000尼特。 Galaxy M52 5G凭借其轻巧的结构、120赫兹的OLED显示屏和5000毫安时的电池,不仅对Galaxy ,特别是由于三星智能手机还支持microSD卡,并使用强大的芯片组Snapdragon 778G,应该会很有趣。但仍有一个主要缺点...
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone
三星Galaxy M52 5G

Galaxy M52 5G的亮点之一可能是6.7英寸Super-AMOLED Plus显示屏,其刷新率为120赫兹,分辨率为FHD+。该 高通骁龙778G这里使用的高通骁龙778G,在德国版本中配有6GB内存和128GB内部UFS存储,在379欧元(约合431美元)的建议零售价中相当引人注目。

在最近的过去,Galaxy M系列的决定性特征是相对强大的电池。比如说 Galaxy M51有一个7000毫安时的电池。在5000毫安时的容量下,Galaxy M52 5G的电池仍然相当大,但不再从大众中脱颖而出。

在这篇评论中,我们将了解到三星最新的中档智能手机在这个价格段与强大的竞争对手相比的表现,特别是非常相似的 Galaxy A52s 5G.

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G (Galaxy M Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Memory
6144 MB 
Display
6.70 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 393 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, Super AMOLED Plus, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB Type-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.4 x 164.2 x 76.4
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (f/1.8) + 12MP (f/2.2, wide angle lens) + 5MP (f/2.4, macro)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.2)
Additional features
Speakers: mono, Keyboard: virtual, 15W charger, USB cable, OneUI, 24 Months Warranty, SAR value: 0.789W/​kg head, 1.4W/​kg body, Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
173 g, Power Supply: 56 g
Price
379 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors for Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.4 %
01/2022
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642
173 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
86.3 %
12/2021
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642
158 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
81.2 %
11/2021
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
185 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
84.9 %
10/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
85.9 %
04/2021
Xiaomi Poco F3
SD 870, Adreno 650
196 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
84.9 %
08/2021
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9
189 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
Galaxy M52 5G的颜色
Galaxy M52 5G的颜色

我们发现Galaxy M52 5G的视觉外观非常有吸引力。6.7英寸的OLED显示屏被侧面纤细的边框所包围,由于有冲孔,顶部的边框也变得相当纤细,导致该设备正面的有效显示与表面比率几乎达到87%。然而,与 Galaxy A52s 5G在显示玻璃方面有一些成本削减--或者至少三星M系列智能手机没有使用大猩猩玻璃。

在Galaxy M52 5G的情况下,一些更多的成本削减也变得明显。这款三星智能手机不提供IP认证,因此没有防尘或防溅的保护,而且其金属框架的 A52s 5G在Galaxy M52 5G中被替换成了塑料框架。然而,触觉、做工和材料的选择仍处于良好水平。内置的按键紧紧地坐在框架中,其压力点感觉舒适牢固。

与其他一些中档手机的代表相比,这款三星智能手机相对较轻,只有173克(约6.1盎司)。Galaxy M52 5G的塑料背面,有冰蓝、炽热黑和白色三种颜色可供选择,肯定对此有影响。所有颜色的版本都有一个共同的条纹外观,但不幸的是,由于表面发亮,这几乎不能掩盖任何指纹,而且经常因一些油腻的污点而显得很脏。

三星Galaxy M52 5G
三星Galaxy M52 5G
三星Galaxy M52 5G
三星Galaxy M52 5G
三星Galaxy M52 5G
三星Galaxy M52 5G

Size Comparison

166 mm 76 mm 8 mm 185 g164.2 mm 76.4 mm 7.4 mm 173 g163.7 mm 76.4 mm 7.8 mm 196 g159.9 mm 75.1 mm 8.4 mm 189 g159.1 mm 73.3 mm 8.3 mm 189 g160.53 mm 75.73 mm 6.81 mm 158 g

设备 - 没有3.5毫米音频接口的三星智能手机

与之相比Galaxy A52s 5G遗憾的是,M52 5G的买家不得不放弃耳机插孔。UFS存储提供128GB的容量,而256GB的选项是不存在的。由于操作系统和预装的应用程序,实际可用的存储空间要小得多,只有107GB。然而,你可以通过使用microSD卡扩展内部存储。

5000毫安时的电池可以通过支持USB 2.0标准的Type-C端口进行充电,并通过USB-OTG识别存储棒等外部外围设备,测试中没有任何问题。还支持通过Miracast将显示内容无线传输到外部显示器。

你可以在Netflix、Amazon Prime Video或其他流媒体服务上观看高清质量的视频内容,因为它经过了Widevine L1的认证。Galaxy M52 5G的Camera2 API是3级的。

右箱体一侧(钥匙)
右箱体一侧(钥匙)
左侧箱体侧面(卡槽)
左侧箱体侧面(卡槽)
顶部(麦克风)
顶部(麦克风)
底部(麦克风、USB接口、扬声器)
底部(麦克风、USB接口、扬声器)

微型SD卡读卡器

集成的microSD插槽支持当前的SDHC和SDXC标准,最高可达1TB。结合我们的AV PRO V60参考存储卡(128GB),microSD在跨平台磁盘测试中的表现令人信服,在复制数据时,三星智能手机也以50MB/s的速度运行在平均水平之上。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
52.4 MB/s ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
50 MB/s ∼95%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
14.81 MB/s ∼28% -70%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
14.5 MB/s ∼28% -71%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758038.53835.641.338.638.134.529.633.432.333.53433.331.533.533.735.830.332.334.229.133.537.436.139.736.437.234.443.731.240.931.642.336.433.338.835.930.135.135.733.937.845.93936.137.635.739.941.639.645.439.240.140.14739.936.538.83737.742.842.943.639.54242.642.539.842.144.242.640.132.942.942.840.341.341.441.433.840.141.243.143.538.340.543.441.836.139.83538.235.139.334.939.133.930.635.539.833.335.936.736.731.533.238.33538.335.640.136.338.636.541.336.73735.135.436.329.134.535.828.435.635.434.132.440.740.436.941.746.942.642.627.432.232.934.933.933.743.235.335.432.138.934.43839.937.338.832.935.64037.840.635.639.837.435.641.931.440.429.435.537.431.337.331.738.137.834.331.739.541.637.430.431.93135.73237.438.940.231.344.535.836.637.431.635.337.838.236.635.637.542.241.531.835.836.539.2413937.139.438.940.336.334.436.83732.334.930.936.430.338.534.734.938.738.437.73635.13837.136.837.137.537.331.933.636.536.439.938.236.72638.929.736.137.138.537.531.535.233.431.436.341.635.834.934.938.635.938.53835.641.338.638.134.529.633.432.333.53433.331.533.533.735.830.332.334.229.133.537.436.139.736.437.234.443.731.240.931.642.336.433.338.835.930.135.135.733.937.845.93936.137.635.739.941.639.645.439.240.140.14739.936.538.83737.742.842.943.639.54242.642.539.842.144.242.640.132.942.942.840.341.341.441.433.840.141.243.143.538.340.543.441.836.139.83538.235.139.334.939.133.930.635.539.833.335.936.736.731.533.238.33538.335.640.136.338.636.541.336.73735.135.436.329.134.535.828.435.635.434.132.440.740.436.941.746.942.642.627.432.232.934.933.933.743.235.335.432.138.934.43839.937.338.832.935.64037.840.635.639.837.435.641.931.440.429.435.537.431.337.331.738.137.834.331.739.541.637.430.431.93135.73237.438.940.231.344.535.836.637.431.635.337.838.236.635.637.542.241.531.835.836.539.2413937.139.438.940.336.334.436.83732.334.930.936.430.338.534.734.938.738.437.73635.13837.136.837.137.537.331.933.636.536.439.938.236.72638.929.736.137.138.537.531.535.233.431.436.341.635.834.934.938.635.959.970.671.771.272.171.97271.572.27270.971.671.872.271.471.371.572.371.770.671.870.17371.170.972.672.667.771.170.173.163.67170.669.872.267.868.273.571.871.870.972.57269.470.371.172.47170.771.671.1727072.571.571.871.273.170.972.270.673.272.370.372.870.873.271.871.371.272.972.271.172.572.270.970.57371.472.17272.771.370.172.372.471.973.272.47072.571.869.673.272.170.972.971.670.772.671.671.572.173.273.271.371.671.771.872.971.471.572.572.271.173.17271.471.854.354.454.655.555.542.457.956.516.978.977.878.177.278.376.677.97979.379.178.574.377.577.578.275.87976.978.479.378.978.477.379.177.877.478.478.179.478.978.179.277.478.87978.978.278.377.578.778.278.178.677.87877.977.67978.57978.877.977.678.47779.978.377.579.277.379.37778.37873.978.777.877.375.177.676.280.977.778.279.277.578.977.578.676.778.479.177.779.776.977.275.777.175.57877.777.77877.677.876.277.778.377.377.777.477.37875.477.477.476.976.575.150.948.746.747.648.949.749.749.149.849.343.431.664.450.650.250.25050.3Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential write: Ø37.4 (28.4-47)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.4 (26-46.9)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential read: Ø70.3 (42.4-73.5)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73.3 (16.9-80.9)

软件 -Galaxy M52 5G与Android 11

像往常一样,三星在3.1版本中将Android 操作系统与自己的内部One UI表面结合起来,其中还包括Bixby智能助理。然而,这款中档机型并没有通过Samsung DeX提供额外的桌面模式。

三星的Knox安全环境被整合到Galaxy M52 5G的软件和硬件中。另一个有趣的功能是 "RAM Plus",目前也被其他制造商采用。这使Galaxy 智能手机能够分析用户行为,并提供高达4GB的额外虚拟工作内存。设置菜单还包括一个广泛的永远在线显示功能。

在本次测试时,Galaxy M52 5G是基于Android 11,并有2021年11月的安全补丁。即使三星没有列出更新到Android 12的正式日期,这家韩国制造商已经宣布,Galaxy 设备将在最初推出后至少4年内获得定期安全更新。其中包括 M51前身也被列在这里。然而,与 Galaxy A系列,M系列只在每个季度提供更新。

M52 5G可能不会像旗舰机那样得到三个主要的Android ,但可能会有两年的更新,随之而来的是两个主要的Android 版本。我们期望更新到Android 12,包括 OneUI 4包括OneUI 4,具有新的开始屏幕外观和感觉,广泛的个性化选项,以及2022年第二/第三季度的隐私仪表板。

三星Galaxy M52 5G
三星Galaxy M52 5G
三星Galaxy M52 5G
三星Galaxy M52 5G

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备5G的三星智能手机

在通信模块方面,三星使用了一个用于近场通信的NFC芯片和蓝牙5.0。此外,X53调制解调器的骁龙778G支持5G标准,一系列频率低于6GHz。

Galaxy M52 5G的芯片组还提供了通过4G接入移动互联网的功能,共有13个LTE频段,涵盖了所有与德语国家相关的LTE频率,包括LTE频段20和频段28。然而,在国外旅行,例如去美国,可能会产生一些问题,因为Band 13和25没有被覆盖。

在WLAN网络中,这款中端智能手机提供了一个快速的无线网络标准,即WiFi 6。这允许高传输率,结合我们的Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器,Galaxy M52 5G显示的水平与 A52s 5G的水平。平均高于400 Mbit/s的数值并不差,但那些 小米11 Lite 5G NE一加Nord 2 5G甚至明显更好。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
888 (842min - 904max) MBit/s ∼100% +96%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
884 (444min - 914max) MBit/s ∼100% +95%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
845 (779min - 895max) MBit/s ∼95% +86%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=283, last 2 years)
477 MBit/s ∼54% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
461 (433min - 470max) MBit/s ∼52% +2%
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
454 (425min - 462max) MBit/s ∼51%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
191 (2min - 344max) MBit/s ∼22% -58%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
877 (657min - 928max) MBit/s ∼100% +108%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
766 (339min - 805max) MBit/s ∼87% +82%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
654 (311min - 702max) MBit/s ∼75% +55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=283, last 2 years)
469 MBit/s ∼53% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
425 (413min - 432max) MBit/s ∼48% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
421 (357min - 433max) MBit/s ∼48%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
235 MBit/s ∼27% -44%
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810855416421417414424423425419423433417423423429357374424428422420431426426426427424429425432427339716738748749755749775797780762758758758754777793751764781773775770764787805769785791793416421417414424423425419423433417423423429357374424428422420431426426426427424429425432427339716738748749755749775797780762758758758754777793751764781773775770764787805769785791793425450459441454447459450447458456454458458454460461453448452446460452454462459452460459458874886892895854852859838823779832879884857855867790843818836857812828860825852852812814819Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø420 (357-433)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø754 (339-805)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø454 (425-462)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø845 (779-895)
在室内定位
在室内定位
在户外定位
在户外定位

为了评估我们的测试装置在实践中的定位精度,我们与Garmin Venu 2并行记录了一条路线进行比较。定位是通过GPS(L1)、GLONASS、BeiDou和Galileo(E1)卫星系统以及SBAS支持确定的。

偏差相对较低,在4公里(约2.5英里)的测试路线终点,中档智能手机和智能手表之间的差异只有约20米(约66英尺)。在GPS记录的详细路线中,Galaxy M52 5G也给我们留下了深刻的印象,其定位能力与Garmin设备相似,使我们能够推荐三星智能手机在私人领域的导航任务。

在户外的卫星固定很快就成功了,精确度约为3米(约10英尺),即使在室内,Galaxy M52 5G也能非常迅速和准确地确定其位置。

Garmin Venu 2定位
Garmin Venu 2定位
Garmin Venu 2定位
Garmin Venu 2定位
Garmin Venu 2定位
Garmin Venu 2定位
Galaxy M52 5G定位
Galaxy M52 5G定位
Galaxy M52 5G定位
Galaxy M52 5G定位
Galaxy M52 5G定位
Galaxy M52 5G定位

电话功能和语音质量 - 三星Galaxy M52 5G with VoLTE

三星Galaxy M52 5G

我们非常喜欢三星Galaxy M52 5G的语音质量。还有一些有用的通话功能,如WLAN通话和机载VoLTE,其中语音数据通过4G移动通信网络传输。

如果你使用听筒,Galaxy 智能手机可以提供一个容易理解的语音再现。虽然通过单声道扬声器传递的声音听起来稍显沉闷,有点尖锐,但使用扬声器进行视频通话仍然效果良好。为了做到这一点,我们在测试中使用了Skype应用程序。

照相机 - 三星智能手机配备了三重摄像头

用Galaxy M52 5G拍摄的自拍。
用Galaxy M52 5G拍摄的自拍。
Galaxy M52 5G的人像模式
Galaxy M52 5G的人像模式

虽然前置摄像头被安置在一个小冲孔后面,并提供3200万像素的分辨率,但自拍是使用像素分选来记录的,导致照片只有800万像素的分辨率。白天用前置摄像头拍摄的照片看起来非常好,但在较弱的光线条件下,质量很快就会下降。

Galaxy M52 5G背面的相机设置看起来也非常类似于 A52型号.Galaxy 智能手机的买家收到了一个6400万像素的主传感器,并配有一个1200万像素的广角镜头和一个500万像素的微距传感器。索尼IMX682默认情况下将四个像素分别组合成一个更加感光的超级像素。这导致了1600万像素的图像,但你也可以通过一个特殊模式使用全分辨率。

与之相比 Galaxy A52s 5G,主摄像头不得不在没有光学图像稳定器的情况下进行。在白天,结果最终达到一个体面的中档水平,Galaxy M52 5G能够在我们的测试照片中获得良好的动态效果。然而,在图像清晰度方面,你仍然可以看到一些轻微的不足之处,色彩再现也是如此。

使用ColorChecker Passport,我们分析了64MP镜头在受控光线条件下与实际参考色的色彩还原度。除了智能手机典型的较亮的照明外,Galaxy M52 5G在ColorChecker中也显示出相当大的偏差。然而,对于这个价格范围来说,色彩准确性仍然是可以接受的。

虽然微距镜头在日常使用中可能只提供很少的优势,但1200万像素的超广角相机以123度的视角而与众不同。尽管我们的测试装置的广角记录提供了比入门级相机更好的质量。 Galaxy's但M52 5G在这方面并没有给我们留下真正的印象。边缘在很大程度上是模糊的,基本锐度很低。

视频可以以UHD和最多30帧的速度录制,而60帧的全高清录制也是可能的。幸运的是,在录制视频时,你也可以在主摄像头和广角摄像头之间切换。

广角拍摄
广角拍摄
主摄像头
2倍变焦
4倍变焦
10倍变焦(最大)
三星Galaxy M52 5G测试
三星Galaxy M52 5G测试
测试三星Galaxy M52 5G
三星Galaxy M52 5G测试

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraLow LightWeitwinkel
click to load images
ColorChecker
18.7 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
11 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
7 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
12 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M52 5G: 12.28 ∆E min: 2.09 - max: 19.56 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
49.8 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
59.5 ∆E
49.5 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
29 ∆E
58.3 ∆E
60.2 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
66.7 ∆E
41.5 ∆E
42 ∆E
70.4 ∆E
65.9 ∆E
50 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M52 5G: 43.78 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 70.37 ∆E

附件和保修 - 仅在15瓦时为Galaxy M52 5G充电

三星Galaxy A52 5G的15W充电器
三星Galaxy A52 5G的15W充电器

三星Galaxy M52 5G的包装盒包括一个模块化充电器(USB-A)和一条数据或充电线(USB-A到USB-C)。虽然Galaxy 智能手机支持高达25瓦的快速充电功能,但附带的充电器只提供15瓦。

三星为其智能手机提供24个月的保修。与之相比 Galaxy A52s 5G,你不能用M型号订购三星护理+。在测试时,制造商也没有为Galaxy M52 5G提供任何具体配件。这是令人遗憾的,因为这款中档智能手机不包括一个箱子。三星智能手机的拥有者还将在网上商店徒劳地寻找一个25瓦的充电器。

输入设备和操作 - 带有面部解锁功能的三星智能手机

尽管Galaxy M52 5G有一个OLED面板,但主动式指纹传感器位于机箱的框架内。生物识别手指通常是准确的,但有时我们必须重新定位我们的手指,以使其被识别。此外,该传感器的速度其实并不高。

作为一个额外的解锁选项,简单的二维人脸识别是可用的,它通过前置摄像头实现。识别率是令人信服的,但二维人脸解锁功能并不十分安全。

6.7英寸AMOLED显示屏上的输入可以准确快速地识别到触摸屏的各个角落。由于120赫兹的高刷新率,这款三星智能手机提供了一个流畅的操作。

三星Galaxy M52 5G测试
三星Galaxy M52 5G测试
三星Galaxy M52 5G测试

显示屏 -Galaxy M52 5G with OLED

子像素网格
子像素网格

Galaxy M52 5G的16.5厘米(6.7英寸)Infinity-O显示屏是基于内部的Super-AMOLED技术。虽然制造商官方没有宣传HDR10认证,但根据 "DRM信息 "应用程序,OLED面板的分辨率为2400 x 1080像素,支持HDR内容。考虑到我们在APL50测试中测得的1012cd/m²的亮度,用户也应该从中受益,尤其是APL50还留有一些余量。

为了控制亮度,这款中档智能手机采用了236赫兹的低频率的脉冲宽度调制。在三星智能手机中,OLED的闪烁在整个光谱中是很明显的。我们在设置菜单中没有看到直流调光模式。

显示器的刷新率可以设置为60或120赫兹。没有自适应控制。这意味着,Galaxy M智能手机的面板无法根据显示内容自动调整,就像 高级设备例如,制造商的高级设备。

667
cd/m²
667
cd/m²
694
cd/m²
667
cd/m²
666
cd/m²
695
cd/m²
663
cd/m²
659
cd/m²
692
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Super AMOLED Plus
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 695 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 674.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 666 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.28 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
95.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.246
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi Poco F3
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Screen
35%
-42%
1%
38%
-26%
Brightness middle
666
797
20%
420
-37%
736
11%
889
33%
594
-11%
Brightness
674
800
19%
428
-36%
751
11%
902
34%
594
-12%
Brightness Distribution
95
97
2%
89
-6%
96
1%
95
0%
99
4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.28
0.9
61%
3.15
-38%
2.18
4%
0.9
61%
2.74
-20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.28
2
53%
7.1
-66%
5.69
-33%
1.9
56%
6
-40%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.4
1.1
54%
4
-67%
2.1
12%
1.3
46%
4.2
-75%
Gamma
2.246 98%
2.26 97%
2.233 99%
2.27 97%
2.26 97%
2.278 97%
CCT
6538 99%
6397 102%
7413 88%
6563 99%
6614 98%
7322 89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 235.8 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 235.8 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 235.8 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 20931 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Galaxy M52 5G并没有为色彩调整提供很多设置选项,但至少用户可以在两个不同的配置文件中进行选择。虽然在标准配置文件中可以调整色温,但不能改变饱和度或伽玛等独立参数。

在我们用CalMAN软件和光谱光度计进行的测试中,三星智能手机的AMOLED面板似乎有一个体面的校准,并为这个价格级别提供令人满意的色彩偏差(在自然配置文件中)。由于OLED技术,独立的像素可以完全关闭,有一个 "绝对 "的黑色,并且对比度(理论上)趋向于无限。

色彩准确度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩准确度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:AdobeRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:AdobeRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:P3;配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:P3;配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.5 ms).

由于相对较高的亮度,Galaxy M52 5G在户外的日常使用中也显示出其良好的装备。即使在阳光直射下,玻璃表面有一些反光,由于高亮度和高对比度,图像内容仍应保持容易阅读。

AMOLED面板的视角稳定性非常好,只有在非常陡峭的视角下,你才能注意到亮度的轻微损失。

三星Galaxy M52 5G测试
三星Galaxy M52 5G测试

性能 - 采用高通SoC的三星智能手机

芯片高通骁龙778G在Galaxy M52 5G中运行的处理器包含八个核心,分布在两个集群中。Cortex A78集群提供四个内核(2.4 GHz),而其余四个内核则基于A55架构(1.8 GHz)。处理器标签中的 "G "表示对游戏的一些专门化。据高通公司称,几个WiFi功能为此进行了调整,而 Adreno 642L图形单元进行了加速。

在日常操作中,中端处理器与内置的6GB LPDDR4x-RAM相结合,确保了良好的系统性能。由于快速的120-Hz显示屏,动画的渲染很流畅,应用程序的加载时间也相当短。然而,其他中档智能手机,如 OnePlus Nord 2 5G以UFS 3.1规格设定了一个明显更快的标准。这也被我们在AndroBench的测量结果所证明。

在我们的基准测试包中,三星智能手机按照 三星Galaxy A52s 5G的同胞机型,后者也使用了 骁龙778G.整体结果在这个价格级别中处于良好的性能水平,即使是 Poco F3 采用的是 高通骁龙870提供了更多动力。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
765 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
787 Points ∼79% +3%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
511 Points ∼51% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
771 Points ∼77% +1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
998 Points ∼100% +30%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
809 Points ∼81% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (765 - 791, n=7)
780 Points ∼78% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=266, last 2 years)
608 Points ∼61% -21%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2795 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2962 Points ∼88% +6%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1627 Points ∼48% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2808 Points ∼83% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3368 Points ∼100% +21%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
2463 Points ∼73% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2785 - 3000, n=7)
2864 Points ∼85% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=266, last 2 years)
2063 Points ∼61% -26%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2353 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2281 Points ∼51% -3%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1637 Points ∼36% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2216 Points ∼49% -6%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3587 Points ∼80% +52%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4501 Points ∼100% +91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2216 - 2423, n=7)
2293 Points ∼51% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 7701, n=170, last 2 years)
2233 Points ∼50% -5%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2254 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2207 Points ∼47% -2%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1584 Points ∼34% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2359 Points ∼50% +5%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3606 Points ∼76% +60%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4726 Points ∼100% +110%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2207 - 2359, n=7)
2249 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=170, last 2 years)
2279 Points ∼48% +1%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
11754 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
10755 Points ∼79% -8%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
8694 Points ∼64% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
12625 Points ∼93% +7%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
13610 Points ∼100% +16%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
8486 Points ∼62% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (9330 - 13296, n=6)
11639 Points ∼86% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=90, last 2 years)
9994 Points ∼73% -15%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
6409 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6389 Points ∼100% 0%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3783 Points ∼59% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
6352 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6340 - 6409, n=6)
6373 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=229, last 2 years)
3572 Points ∼56% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
7242 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7238 Points ∼100% 0%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3948 Points ∼55% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
7241 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (7189 - 7276, n=6)
7235 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=229, last 2 years)
4159 Points ∼57% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4535 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4529 Points ∼100% 0%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3283 Points ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4442 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4410 - 4605, n=6)
4493 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (677 - 5301, n=229, last 2 years)
2886 Points ∼64% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
6398 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6458 Points ∼81% +1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3859 Points ∼48% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
6559 Points ∼82% +3%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7970 Points ∼100% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6398 - 6703, n=6)
6566 Points ∼82% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=257, last 2 years)
4436 Points ∼56% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
7199 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7608 Points ∼63% +6%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
4038 Points ∼34% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
7496 Points ∼62% +4%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12033 Points ∼100% +67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (7199 - 7618, n=6)
7488 Points ∼62% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=257, last 2 years)
5737 Points ∼48% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
6394 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4224 Points ∼66% -34%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3102 Points ∼49% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4563 Points ∼71% -29%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3653 Points ∼57% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4224 - 6394, n=6)
4895 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=255, last 2 years)
3126 Points ∼49% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
5065 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5036 Points ∼99% -1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2653 Points ∼52% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4967 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4967 - 5065, n=6)
5029 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=226, last 2 years)
2759 Points ∼54% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
5189 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5213 Points ∼100% 0%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2537 Points ∼49% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
5140 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5140 - 5218, n=6)
5192 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=226, last 2 years)
2916 Points ∼56% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4532 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4501 Points ∼99% -1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3182 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4444 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4423 - 4592, n=6)
4509 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=226, last 2 years)
2907 Points ∼64% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
5032 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5236 Points ∼71% +4%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2745 Points ∼37% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
5355 Points ∼73% +6%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7377 Points ∼100% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5032 - 5469, n=6)
5317 Points ∼72% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=259, last 2 years)
3648 Points ∼49% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
5103 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5651 Points ∼59% +11%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2637 Points ∼28% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
5591 Points ∼59% +10%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
9498 Points ∼100% +86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5103 - 5651, n=6)
5540 Points ∼58% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 16221, n=259, last 2 years)
4271 Points ∼45% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4522 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4166 Points ∼89% -8%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3189 Points ∼68% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4664 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4140 Points ∼89% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4166 - 4942, n=6)
4634 Points ∼99% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=259, last 2 years)
3155 Points ∼68% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4256 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4299 Points ∼100% +1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2537 Points ∼59% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4250 Points ∼98% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4002 - 4810, n=6)
4320 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=199, last 2 years)
2650 Points ∼61% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
5323 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5338 Points ∼100% 0%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2428 Points ∼45% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
5263 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5263 - 5370, n=6)
5321 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=199, last 2 years)
2978 Points ∼56% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2578 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2557 Points ∼92% -1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2793 Points ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2539 Points ∼91% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2137 - 3523, n=6)
2654 Points ∼95% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=199, last 2 years)
2647 Points ∼95% +3%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2465 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2505 Points ∼58% +2%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1252 Points ∼29% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2490 Points ∼58% +1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4288 Points ∼100% +74%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4208 Points ∼98% +71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2465 - 2505, n=6)
2490 Points ∼58% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 9680, n=134, last 2 years)
2955 Points ∼69% +20%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2321 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2500 Points ∼59% +8%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1226 Points ∼29% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
2485 Points ∼58% +7%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4271 Points ∼100% +84%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4214 Points ∼99% +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2321 - 2501, n=6)
2466 Points ∼58% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=131, last 2 years)
3058 Points ∼72% +32%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
690 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
695 Points ∼54% +1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
364 Points ∼28% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
690 Points ∼54% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1223 Points ∼95% +77%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1283 Points ∼100% +86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (690 - 695, n=6)
693 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102 - 3080, n=82, last 2 years)
917 Points ∼71% +33%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
684 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
688 Points ∼55% +1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
352 Points ∼28% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
687 Points ∼55% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1222 Points ∼97% +79%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1256 Points ∼100% +84%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (684 - 690, n=6)
688 Points ∼55% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 4236, n=81, last 2 years)
936 Points ∼75% +37%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
107 fps ∼99%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
89 fps ∼82% -17%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
58 fps ∼54% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
108 fps ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
71 fps ∼66% -34%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
59 fps ∼55% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (60 - 116, n=7)
91.3 fps ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=206, last 2 years)
64.2 fps ∼59% -40%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
132 fps ∼66%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
133 fps ∼67% +1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
69 fps ∼35% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
132 fps ∼66% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
200 fps ∼100% +52%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
178 fps ∼89% +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (132 - 134, n=7)
133 fps ∼67% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 417, n=206, last 2 years)
121 fps ∼61% -8%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
68 fps ∼99%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
69 fps ∼100% +1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
47 fps ∼68% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
60 fps ∼87% -12%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
60 fps ∼87% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (59 - 69, n=7)
65.9 fps ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 121, n=205, last 2 years)
51.5 fps ∼75% -24%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
77 fps ∼62%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
79 fps ∼64% +3%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
41 fps ∼33% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
77 fps ∼62% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
119 fps ∼96% +55%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
124 fps ∼100% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (77 - 79, n=7)
78 fps ∼63% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 229, n=206, last 2 years)
70.4 fps ∼57% -9%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
49 fps ∼83%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
51 fps ∼86% +4%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
24 fps ∼41% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
49 fps ∼83% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +20%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
58 fps ∼98% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (48 - 53, n=7)
49.9 fps ∼85% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=204, last 2 years)
40.1 fps ∼68% -18%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
56 fps ∼69%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
57 fps ∼70% +2%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
27 fps ∼33% -52%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
56 fps ∼69% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
81 fps ∼100% +45%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
77 fps ∼95% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (56 - 57, n=7)
56.4 fps ∼70% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 151, n=204, last 2 years)
48.5 fps ∼60% -13%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
28 fps ∼64%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
29 fps ∼66% +4%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
14 fps ∼32% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
28 fps ∼64% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
44 fps ∼100% +57%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
41 fps ∼93% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (28 - 31, n=7)
28.9 fps ∼66% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 61, n=203, last 2 years)
25.1 fps ∼57% -10%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
33 fps ∼69%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
33 fps ∼69% 0%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
17 fps ∼35% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
33 fps ∼69% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
48 fps ∼100% +45%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
47 fps ∼98% +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (33 - 33, n=7)
33 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=203, last 2 years)
29.2 fps ∼61% -12%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
30 fps ∼61%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
33 fps ∼67% +10%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
15 fps ∼31% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
30 fps ∼61% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
49 fps ∼100% +63%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
48 fps ∼98% +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (30 - 35, n=7)
31.6 fps ∼64% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=269, last 2 years)
25.5 fps ∼52% -15%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
34 fps ∼60%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
39 fps ∼68% +15%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
17 fps ∼30% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
34 fps ∼60% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
57 fps ∼100% +68%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
54 fps ∼95% +59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (34 - 39, n=7)
36 fps ∼63% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 257, n=269, last 2 years)
29.9 fps ∼52% -12%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
19 fps ∼58%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
20 fps ∼61% +5%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
9.6 fps ∼29% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
19 fps ∼58% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +74%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
31 fps ∼94% +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (19 - 22, n=7)
19.9 fps ∼60% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 60, n=270, last 2 years)
17.1 fps ∼52% -10%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
13 fps ∼59%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
14 fps ∼64% +8%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
6.1 fps ∼28% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
13 fps ∼59% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
22 fps ∼100% +69%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
21 fps ∼95% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (13 - 14, n=7)
13.4 fps ∼61% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 101, n=270, last 2 years)
11.5 fps ∼52% -12%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
503392 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
509185 Points ∼75% +1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
325377 Points ∼48% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
438254 Points ∼64% -13%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
680139 Points ∼100% +35%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
604538 Points ∼89% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (438254 - 520706, n=7)
495281 Points ∼73% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (117053 - 815441, n=70, last 2 years)
504373 Points ∼74% 0%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
136987 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
12743 Points ∼9% -91%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
139024 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
111838 Points ∼80% -18%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
71083 Points ∼51% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (136987 - 140376, n=4)
138589 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 264766, n=93, last 2 years)
66772 Points ∼48% -51%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4321 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4809 Points ∼76% +11%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2783 Points ∼44% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4349 Points ∼68% +1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
6356 Points ∼100% +47%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
5130 Points ∼81% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4321 - 5002, n=7)
4688 Points ∼74% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (615 - 8124, n=192, last 2 years)
3926 Points ∼62% -9%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
8963 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
10455 Points ∼100% +17%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
4183 Points ∼40% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
9089 Points ∼87% +1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
9997 Points ∼96% +12%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
9622 Points ∼92% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (8751 - 10816, n=7)
9755 Points ∼93% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 19657, n=192, last 2 years)
7121 Points ∼68% -21%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
3956 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4957 Points ∼64% +25%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3556 Points ∼46% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
4269 Points ∼55% +8%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7692 Points ∼100% +94%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
7277 Points ∼95% +84%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (3956 - 6372, n=7)
5217 Points ∼68% +32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=192, last 2 years)
4620 Points ∼60% +17%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
6654 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6729 Points ∼53% +1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2837 Points ∼22% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
6783 Points ∼53% +2%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12801 Points ∼100% +92%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
7754 Points ∼61% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6654 - 6783, n=7)
6714 Points ∼52% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 25642, n=192, last 2 years)
6231 Points ∼49% -6%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
1386 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
1534 Points ∼93% +11%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1382 Points ∼83% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
1359 Points ∼82% -2%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1658 Points ∼100% +20%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1276 Points ∼77% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (1295 - 1534, n=7)
1419 Points ∼86% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2392, n=192, last 2 years)
1331 Points ∼80% -4%
UL Procyon AI Inference - Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
7658 Points ∼35%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
6559 Points ∼30% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 6144
7622 Points ∼35% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12855 Points ∼59% +68%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
21710 Points ∼100% +183%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (7622 - 7658, n=2)
7640 Points ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1555 - 31586, n=44, last 2 years)
10659 Points ∼49% +39%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
86.191 Points ∼100% +16%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
75.089 Points ∼87% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (58.8 - 86.8, n=7)
74.6 Points ∼87% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G (Chrome96)
74.421 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
71.757 Points ∼83% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182, n=185, last 2 years)
55 Points ∼64% -26%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
51.066 Points ∼59% -31%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94)
38.283 Points ∼44% -49%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
155.28 Points ∼100% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (103 - 155, n=7)
132 Points ∼85% +9%
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G (Chrome96)
120.65 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
118.13 Points ∼76% -2%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
108.77 Points ∼70% -10%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
105.4 Points ∼68% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=193, last 2 years)
100 Points ∼64% -17%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94)
75.343 Points ∼49% -38%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
74.8 runs/min ∼100% +42%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
61.52 runs/min ∼82% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (52.5 - 61.5, n=5)
56.7 runs/min ∼76% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=170, last 2 years)
54 runs/min ∼72% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chome 93)
53.23 runs/min ∼71% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G (Chrome96)
52.5 runs/min ∼70%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chome 92)
50.2 runs/min ∼67% -4%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94)
35.3 runs/min ∼47% -33%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
125 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
113 Points ∼90% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
107 Points ∼86% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (93 - 131, n=7)
106 Points ∼85% +5%
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G (Chrome96)
101 Points ∼81%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 252, n=198, last 2 years)
83.4 Points ∼67% -17%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
69 Points ∼55% -32%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94)
57 Points ∼46% -44%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
31915 Points ∼100% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (23915 - 31915, n=7)
28217 Points ∼88% +11%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
26577 Points ∼83% +4%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
26207 Points ∼82% +3%
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G (Chrome96)
25433 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
25119 Points ∼79% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 64222, n=204, last 2 years)
19745 Points ∼62% -22%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94)
17637 Points ∼55% -31%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 29635, n=206, last 2 years)
3603 ms * ∼100% -102%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94)
2475.3 ms * ∼69% -38%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
1808.9 ms * ∼50% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
1802.2 ms * ∼50% -1%
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G (Chrome96)
1787.8 ms * ∼50%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
1743.8 ms * ∼48% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (1323 - 1893, n=7)
1569 ms * ∼44% +12%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
1322.5 ms * ∼37% +26%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy M52 5GXiaomi 11 Lite 5G NEMotorola Edge 20 LiteSamsung Galaxy A52s 5GXiaomi Poco F3OnePlus Nord 2 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
16%
-6%
3%
27%
81%
-26%
-16%
Sequential Read 256KB
906.54
943.78
4%
954.33
5%
951
5%
1378.12
52%
1827
102%
770 ?(427 - 1011, n=93)
-15%
842 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=273, last 2 years)
-7%
Sequential Write 256KB
487.32
679.43
39%
478.27
-2%
486.5
0%
684.13
40%
1256.4
158%
273 ?(13.6 - 707, n=93)
-44%
385 ?(11.9 - 1321, n=273, last 2 years)
-21%
Random Read 4KB
165.02
208.71
26%
141.39
-14%
168.2
2%
208.02
26%
223.7
36%
148 ?(92.6 - 239, n=93)
-10%
148 ?(13.5 - 325, n=273, last 2 years)
-10%
Random Write 4KB
187.78
178.81
-5%
161.85
-14%
192.5
3%
170.57
-9%
239
27%
125 ?(18.2 - 290, n=93)
-33%
139 ?(5.5 - 330, n=273, last 2 years)
-26%

游戏 -Galaxy M52 5G达到100帧以上

事实上,你也可以在Galaxy M52 5G上流畅地玩高要求的游戏,这是由以下因素保证的 Adreno 642L,其中包括选定的骁龙精英游戏功能,如 "游戏平滑器 "或 "游戏网络延时管理器"。此外,三星实现了其内部的 "游戏助推器",它应该可以控制温度和内存的使用,等等。

然而,Galaxy 智能手机的买家还是应该明白,M52 5G不是一款游戏智能手机。例如,PUBG手机只能在高清设置下播放,而且不能选择最高细节级别(UHD)。我们通过GameBench应用程序对游戏性能进行了更详细的观察.Adreno 642L在中等图形设置下能够达到约40帧,在低细节设置下能够明显提高到60帧。

即使是理论上支持144帧的Armajet竞技场射击游戏,也没有以恒定的帧率再现,三星中档智能手机仍然有时达到100帧以上。我们的测量结果显示平均每秒89帧。

0102030405060708090100110108971131011119810210410310210097103991049895929298969191948390898785868983878685849177938488908687838285798180897875931121079682948982838386829182969998908598848090938381788081817774808081888889898280828286918190848280797889848480778080929890102909090928787928594918589838490928889839393108971131011119810210410310210097103991049895929298969191948390898785868983878685849177938488908687838285798180897875931121079682948982838386829182969998908598848090938381788081817774808081888889898280828286918190848280797889848480778080929890102909090928787928594918589838490928889839393596059605861605958605960606060606058606060606060606060606060606060606060605960596160605960606061586159606160575960596060605960605960605960606059606061596060606160596060606060596060606159605960616059615960596060606157546010897113101111981021041031021009710399104989592929896919194839089878586898387868584917793848890868783828579818089787593112107968294898283838682918296999890859884809093838178808181777480808188888989828082828691819084828079788984848077808092989010290909092878792859491858983849092888983939359605960586160595860596060606060605860606060606060606060606060606060606060596059616060596060606158615960616057596059606060596060596060596060605960606159606060616059606060606059606060615960596061605961596059606060615754604039414040404040394140404039404040404040404040403941403940404040404040404039404040404040394040404040404040404039404040403940394040384040404040404040404040108971131011119810210410310210097103991049895929298969191948390898785868983878685849177938488908687838285798180897875931121079682948982838386829182969998908598848090938381788081817774808081888889898280828286918190848280797889848480778080929890102909090928787928594918589838490928889839393596059605861605958605960606060606058606060606060606060606060606060606060605960596160605960606061586159606160575960596060605960605960605960606059606061596060606160596060606060596060606159605960616059615960596060606157546040394140404040403941404040394040404040404040404039414039404040404040404040394040404040403940404040404040404040394040404039403940403840404040404040404040403940394040404040404040403940404040404040404040404040394040404040394040394040404040394040404040404040404040404040404039404040404040404040403940404040404040404040404139404040404040404040404040404040404040404039374040Tooltip
; Armajet: Ø88.7 (74-113)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.7 (54-61)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø39.9 (38-41)
; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39.9 (37-41)

排放--三星Galaxy M52 5G变得相当热。

温度

GFXBench基准测试
GFXBench基准测试

内部冷却系统并不总是能保持热开发的 骁龙SoC在控制之下。与之相比 小米11 Lite 5G NE,Galaxy 智能手机的外壳可以变得相对温暖,甚至在较长的负载下发热。我们测得的最高值几乎为45℃(113°F)。另一方面,它在空闲运行时几乎不会变热。

Galaxy M52 5G完成了GFXBench的电池测试,没有任何问题,甚至在苛刻的曼哈顿测试(OpenGL ES 3.1)中也是如此。Wild Life的压力测试也没有任何问题。

Max. Load
 44.4 °C39.4 °C35.9 °C 
 44.6 °C39.3 °C35.9 °C 
 44.5 °C39 °C35.7 °C 
Maximum: 44.6 °C
Average: 39.9 °C
30.6 °C37.1 °C38.7 °C
33.1 °C38.7 °C44.5 °C
34.3 °C39.4 °C43.4 °C
Maximum: 44.5 °C
Average: 37.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260