Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy M33 5G智能手机评论--120赫兹在中档手机中是否足够?

AMOLED是昨天。 与前辈和其他大多数同价位的手机不同,三星的Galaxy M33有一个快速的屏幕,但它不是基于AMOLED技术的。阅读我们的评论,了解这款中档手机是否还能说服人。
5G Android ARM Smartphone
三星Galaxy M33
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G (Galaxy M Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 1280 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHz
Graphics adapter
Memory
6144 MB 
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixel 400 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 115 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n78) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.4 x 165.4 x 76.9
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 25 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​30fps (Camera 1); 5.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (Camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.2, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 1.042W/​kg (head), 1.378W/​kg (body) , fanless
Weight
198 g
Price
349 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81 %
07/2022
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4
198 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
78.4 %
02/2022
Samsung Galaxy M32
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
180 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.40"2400x1080
83 %
07/2022
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4
186 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.40"2400x1080
83.8 %
03/2022
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4
173 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080
81.4 %
07/2022
Motorola Moto G82 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
173 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2400x1080

案例和特点 - 稳定和漂亮

三星的M系列今年更谨慎一些。因此,Galaxy M33 5G配备了一个简单的哑光反射背面,颜色相当柔和,如棕色、深蓝色和绿色。镜面效果实际上相当漂亮,但背面几乎神奇地吸引了指纹。

塑料外壳的稳定性几乎无可挑剔:它的结构非常坚固,很难扭曲。显示器也受到大猩猩5号玻璃的保护。然而,198克的重量是相当高的。

与前代产品相比 Galaxy M32现在终于有了更快的大容量存储,而且128GB的容量也不错。三星希望它比去年的349欧元多得多,但在互联网上的价格已经大幅下降,例如在amazon.de在测试的时候。

插入两张SIM卡后还可以使用microSD插槽。它实际上处于平均速度水平,正如我们用参考卡Angelbird V60所显示的那样。然而,CPDT基准显示,在连续读取时,数据速率明显波动。

三星Galaxy M33
三星Galaxy M33
三星Galaxy M33
三星Galaxy M33
三星Galaxy M33
三星Galaxy M33
三星Galaxy M33

尺寸比较

165.4 mm 76.9 mm 9.4 mm 198 g160.9 mm 74.5 mm 8 mm 173 g159.7 mm 74 mm 8.1 mm 186 g159.3 mm 74 mm 8.4 mm 180 g160 mm 73 mm 7 mm 173 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
59.21 MB/s ∼100% +72%
Samsung Galaxy M32
  (Angelbird V60)
40.7 MB/s ∼69% +18%
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
  (Angelbird V60)
34.38 MB/s ∼58%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
  (Angelbird V60)
31.6 MB/s ∼53% -8%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
  (Angelbird V60)
27.5 MB/s ∼46% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.9 - 59.2, n=100, last 2 years)
26.3 MB/s ∼44% -24%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø43.3 (29.4-63.5)
Samsung Galaxy M32 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.7 (25-43.4)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø43.7 (29-56.7)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.1 (25.1-49.3)
Motorola Moto G82 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø33.1 (23.8-41.8)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø84.6 (44.2-109.8)
Samsung Galaxy M32 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø60.7 (30.5-64.9)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø83.8 (43.5-112.8)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø78 (32.1-84.2)
Motorola Moto G82 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.2 (38-84.1)

通信、软件和操作--三星迅捷的指纹识别传感器

虽然有一个Galaxy M32 5G,但它从未到达我们欧洲。现在我们也得到了5G版本的Galaxy M33。这款智能手机可能无法在世界任何地方使用4G和5G网络,但频率多样性应该足以满足一些目的地的需要。

Wi-Fi模块支持WiFi 5标准。然而,在我们与参考路由器华硕ROG AXE11000的测试中,它在传输方向上有点弱,而在接收方向上,它至少可以跟上大多数竞争的智能手机。

OneUI 4.1是三星自己的操作系统,基于Android 12。它也预装在Galaxy M33中,包括相当多的第三方应用程序,这些应用程序填满了内存,如果用户不喜欢它们,应该卸载。

在我们的测试中,我们收到了更新到2022年7月1日的安全补丁,这在测试时是非常最新的。到目前为止,这款手机每2个月收到一次安全更新,根据制造商的说法,这应该在上市后至少4年内保持不变。关于Android 的更新没有可靠的说法,但手机应该还是会得到Android 13。

120赫兹的屏幕使操作非常流畅,尽管永久的120赫兹是不可能的。在较长的剧照或在键盘上打字时,屏幕会切换到60帧。正如我们在刷新率显示中发现的那样,这一点运行良好且可靠。

指纹传感器位于待机按钮的右侧。当你按下按钮或只是把手指放在上面时,它几乎可以立即解锁手机。通过面部识别解锁也是可能的,但这只是通过软件解决方案进行2D解锁,因此并不十分安全。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy M32
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
347 (327min - 352max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy M32
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
335 (259min - 351max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
498 (463min - 510max) MBit/s ∼100% +89%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
364 (349min - 382max) MBit/s ∼73% +38%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
268 (133min - 280max) MBit/s ∼54% +2%
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
264 (244min - 277max) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
417 (349min - 444max) MBit/s ∼100% +21%
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
344 (320min - 349max) MBit/s ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
343 (337min - 348max) MBit/s ∼82% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
342 (321min - 351max) MBit/s ∼82% -1%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø343 (320-349)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø264 (244-277)

照相机 - 你不应该喜欢它太尖锐

前置摄像头的录制
前置摄像头的录制

你必须应对摄像头中较少的像素:事实上,主摄像头中只有5000万像素,而在M32中则是6400万像素。 Galaxy M32比起广角镜头从800万像素下降到500万像素,这应该更容易被接受。

主摄像头的传感器来自三星,它是经常用于廉价中档和入门级手机的ISOCELL JN1。它并不完全以其细节和动态的清晰度而闻名,Galaxy M33在这些方面也有轻微的弱点。特别是周围的图像在阴天时看起来非常阴暗,放大后也很模糊。

在弱光下,暗处的细节不再可见。在画面的明亮部分,相机尽力而为,但在重新对焦时产生了像素伪影,否则就相当模糊。

主摄像头甚至可以录制30帧的4K视频,但广角摄像头只能录制30帧的全高清视频。如果你期望在录制过程中进行混合变焦,你会感到失望。你只能在镜头之间切换,而智能手机为此需要一个短暂的停顿。亮度调节通常工作得相当快,但自动对焦在风景变化时喜欢抽风。

广角摄像头拍摄的照片细节很少,在阴天时亮度也相对较低。

在前面,有一个800万像素的摄像头。即使在较暗的地方,它也能拍出不错的照片,细节尚可。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow LightUltra wide-angle
click to load images
ColorChecker
19.9 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
9 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
7 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
16 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M33 5G: 11.5 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 23.6 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
52 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
62 ∆E
50.9 ∆E
34.5 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
29 ∆E
63.1 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
45.8 ∆E
35 ∆E
73.2 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
83.9 ∆E
68.6 ∆E
51 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M33 5G: 45.48 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 83.92 ∆E

显示屏 - IPS,亮度稍低

子像素记录
子像素记录

如前所述,Galaxy M33只提供全高清分辨率的IPS屏幕,但至少有120赫兹刷新率。否则,在这个价格范围内通常会安装AMOLED屏幕。

这不是一个问题,因为IPS屏幕也可以提供很好的画质,而且Galaxy M33的屏幕不会出现PWM闪烁的情况。然而,黑色水平、亮度和色彩再现都落后于竞争对手。灰度显示出明显的蓝色偏移,响应时间对游戏玩家来说可能太慢。

510
cd/m²
527
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
510
cd/m²
545
cd/m²
537
cd/m²
521
cd/m²
553
cd/m²
538
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 553 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 529.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.86 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 545 cd/m²
Contrast: 1090:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.02 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.399
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Samsung Galaxy M32
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Motorola Moto G82 5G
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.60
Response Times
59%
94%
59%
42%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
31 ?(17, 14)
10 ?(7, 3)
68%
1.303 ?(0.627, 0.676)
96%
6 ?(3, 3)
81%
13 ?(8, 5)
58%
Response Time Black / White *
16 ?(10, 6)
8 ?(5, 3)
50%
1.25 ?(0.623, 0.627)
92%
10 ?(5, 5)
37%
12 ?(6, 6)
25%
PWM Frequency
362.3 ?(99)
366.2
354.6
119.4
Screen
39%
46%
16%
17%
Brightness middle
545
712
31%
693
27%
601
10%
635
17%
Brightness
530
720
36%
695
31%
596
12%
640
21%
Brightness Distribution
92
95
3%
98
7%
98
7%
96
4%
Black Level *
0.5
Contrast
1090
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.02
1.94
61%
1.3
74%
3.35
33%
2.96
41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.9
5.81
26%
3.5
56%
6.72
15%
7.63
3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.8
1.5
74%
1.3
78%
4.6
21%
4.8
17%
Gamma
2.399 92%
2.089 105%
2.14 103%
2.363 93%
2.214 99%
CCT
7942 82%
6593 99%
6530 100%
7372 88%
6970 93%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
49% / 44%
70% / 58%
38% / 27%
30% / 23%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19959 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 功率大,运行时间短

Exynos 1280被用作今年三星许多中档手机的SoC,例如在 Galaxy A33Galaxy A53.Galaxy M33也使用了它,因此在其价格范围内提供了体面的性能率,与前代产品相比,性能有了明显的飞跃。

内存的速度也比在 Galaxy M32然而,SoC的慢速内存控制器阻碍了更好的速度。该 一加北方CE 2显示了它如何能做得更好。

智能手机在低负荷下不会明显变热,但当你长时间运行复杂的应用程序时,外壳温度在某些方面会上升到近43℃。这也就差不多了,但已经很明显了。我们也是在室温下得到的结果,所以在室外温暖的温度下可能会导致明显更高的废热。

底部边缘的单声道扬声器可以变得相当响亮,但有些偏重高音。你可以听音乐,但你更应该通过3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙连接耳机或扬声器,以获得真正悦耳的声音。三星在aptX蓝牙编解码器方面遇到了困难。支持基本形式,但不支持更现代和更高质量的编解码,如aptX HD。相反,有三星自己的可扩展编解码器和LDAC,但同样不是高清变体。

这款手机的最大充电功率为25瓦,但Galaxy M33 5G不包括充电器。这款手机在完全充电的情况下需要不到2个小时才能充满。凭借5000毫安时的电池,Galaxy M33在其价格范围内的定位并不差,但仍不得不接受运行时间的损失:在我们的WLAN测试中,它的持续时间比前代产品少得多,在同类产品比较中无法真正脱颖而出。它应该足够在没有电源插座的情况下使用一到两天,但如果能有更高的能源效率,就可以使用更多的时间。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
736 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
367 Points ∼49% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
737 Points ∼99% 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
747 Points ∼100% +1%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
671 Points ∼90% -9%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (736 - 740, n=3)
738 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=267, last 2 years)
683 Points ∼91% -7%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1826 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1342 Points ∼60% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1905 Points ∼86% +4%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2182 Points ∼98% +19%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1946 Points ∼88% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (1826 - 1905, n=3)
1870 Points ∼84% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=267, last 2 years)
2222 Points ∼100% +22%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11228 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
6508 Points ∼58% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11077 Points ∼98% -1%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
8055 Points ∼72% -28%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7843 Points ∼70% -30%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (11077 - 11470, n=3)
11258 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=173, last 2 years)
10212 Points ∼91% -9%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4505 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1743 Points ∼34% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4630 Points ∼91% +3%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
5099 Points ∼100% +13%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4286 Points ∼84% -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (4505 - 4645, n=3)
4593 Points ∼90% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 13341, n=229, last 2 years)
5080 Points ∼100% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5193 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1592 Points ∼22% -69%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5418 Points ∼74% +4%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
6041 Points ∼83% +16%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4573 Points ∼63% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (5193 - 5510, n=3)
5374 Points ∼74% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=229, last 2 years)
7291 Points ∼100% +40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3077 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2609 Points ∼74% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3069 Points ∼87% 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
3293 Points ∼94% +7%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3515 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (2997 - 3077, n=3)
3048 Points ∼87% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=227, last 2 years)
3268 Points ∼93% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3378 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1319 Points ∼36% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3592 Points ∼98% +6%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
3647 Points ∼100% +8%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2959 Points ∼81% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (3378 - 3621, n=3)
3530 Points ∼97% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=183, last 2 years)
2472 Points ∼68% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3580 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1165 Points ∼29% -67%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3885 Points ∼97% +9%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
3998 Points ∼100% +12%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2837 Points ∼71% -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (3580 - 3939, n=3)
3801 Points ∼95% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=183, last 2 years)
2544 Points ∼64% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2820 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2462 Points ∼71% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2842 Points ∼82% +1%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2893 Points ∼83% +3%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3481 Points ∼100% +23%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (2820 - 2842, n=3)
2828 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5262, n=183, last 2 years)
2862 Points ∼82% +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3514 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1367 Points ∼34% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3683 Points ∼91% +5%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
3874 Points ∼95% +10%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3104 Points ∼76% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (3514 - 3746, n=3)
3648 Points ∼90% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11909, n=242, last 2 years)
4068 Points ∼100% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3678 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1204 Points ∼23% -67%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3922 Points ∼75% +7%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
4028 Points ∼77% +10%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3001 Points ∼58% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (3678 - 3982, n=3)
3861 Points ∼74% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 20955, n=242, last 2 years)
5201 Points ∼100% +41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3041 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2605 Points ∼74% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3035 Points ∼86% 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
3273 Points ∼93% +8%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3529 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (3035 - 3097, n=3)
3058 Points ∼87% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=242, last 2 years)
3252 Points ∼92% +7%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2120 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
685 Points ∼22% -68%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2262 Points ∼73% +7%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2037 Points ∼66% -4%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1209 Points ∼39% -43%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (2120 - 2293, n=3)
2225 Points ∼72% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=200, last 2 years)
3079 Points ∼100% +45%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2119 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
683 Points ∼20% -68%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2238 Points ∼66% +6%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2022 Points ∼59% -5%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1204 Points ∼35% -43%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (2119 - 2275, n=3)
2211 Points ∼65% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 11700, n=205, last 2 years)
3401 Points ∼100% +61%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
596 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
173 Points ∼17% -71%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
632 Points ∼64% +6%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
598 Points ∼60% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
363 Points ∼37% -39%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (596 - 636, n=3)
621 Points ∼63% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 3080, n=163, last 2 years)
991 Points ∼100% +66%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
576 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
172 Points ∼18% -70%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
617 Points ∼63% +7%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
578 Points ∼59% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
354 Points ∼36% -39%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (576 - 621, n=3)
605 Points ∼62% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=158, last 2 years)
980 Points ∼100% +70%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
21 fps ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
8.1 fps ∼28% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
25 fps ∼85% +19%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
24 fps ∼82% +14%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
19 fps ∼65% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (21 - 25, n=3)
23 fps ∼78% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.7 - 104, n=263, last 2 years)
29.4 fps ∼100% +40%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
24 fps ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
9.2 fps ∼26% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
26 fps ∼74% +8%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
27 fps ∼77% +13%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
21 fps ∼60% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (24 - 26, n=3)
25.3 fps ∼72% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 136, n=264, last 2 years)
35.1 fps ∼100% +46%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
14 fps ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
5.1 fps ∼25% -64%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
16 fps ∼78% +14%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
15 fps ∼74% +7%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
12 fps ∼59% -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (14 - 16, n=3)
15 fps ∼74% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3 - 69, n=264, last 2 years)
20.4 fps ∼100% +46%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
9.4 fps ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
3.3 fps ∼25% -65%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
10 fps ∼75% +6%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
10 fps ∼75% +6%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7.8 fps ∼58% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (9.4 - 10, n=3)
9.8 fps ∼73% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 52, n=264, last 2 years)
13.4 fps ∼100% +43%
Samsung Galaxy M33 5GSamsung Galaxy M32Samsung Galaxy A33 5GOnePlus Nord CE 2 5GMotorola Moto G82 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-32%
60%
121%
36%
45%
63%
Sequential Read 256KB
505.2
297.3
-41%
512.84
2%
999
98%
473.4
-6%
683 ?(303 - 999, n=27)
35%
944 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=260, last 2 years)
87%
Sequential Write 256KB
396.6
178.7
-55%
487.66
23%
857
116%
445.7
12%
458 ?(105.3 - 857, n=27)
15%
502 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=260, last 2 years)
27%
Random Read 4KB
89.3
98
10%
216.48
142%
253.4
184%
180.8
102%
165.1 ?(89.3 - 253, n=27)
85%
171.2 ?(13.5 - 345, n=260, last 2 years)
92%
Random Write 4KB
113.8
68.8
-40%
194.12
71%
212.9
87%
155.5
37%
162.6 ?(113.8 - 213, n=27)
43%
167.6 ?(30.3 - 475, n=261, last 2 years)
47%

温度

Max. Load
 42.1 °C37 °C34.1 °C 
 42.9 °C37.6 °C34.8 °C 
 42.6 °C36.6 °C34.7 °C 
Maximum: 42.9 °C
Average: 38 °C
34 °C37.5 °C40 °C
34.7 °C37.7 °C42.9 °C
34 °C40.7 °C42.6 °C
Maximum: 42.9 °C
Average: 38.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热力图前线
热力图前线
热图背面
热图背面

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.7432535.738.73127.329.74033.330.25037.436.56325.230.68018.22010020.520.712513.524.416017.33720013.54325013.548.931513.153.340012.956.550013.362.663015.465.980014.171.7100012.978.512509.676.8160010.674.2200010.374.225001173.4315012.676400015.266500016.858.6630016.465800016.569.71000016.671.31250015.959.91600016.659.7SPL26.385.1N0.758.7median 13.5median 65Delta1.911.337.643.334.837.632.633.237.132.242.836.832.726.622.922.220.224.217.931.415.941.11244.71146.913.450.51156.912.664.912.568.711.867.811.472.411.573.510.572.79.971.910.671.611.972.212.873.313.970.114.462.515.2661669.415.964.216.658.125.382.90.654.3median 12.6median 66210.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy M33 5GMotorola Moto G82 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Motorola Moto G82 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Samsung Galaxy M32
5000 mAh
1098 min ∼42% +28%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
5000 mAh
1022 min ∼39% +19%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
4500 mAh
962 min ∼36% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (424 - 1953, n=268, last 2 years)
907 min ∼34% +6%
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
5000 mAh
859 min ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
5000 mAh
771 min ∼29% -10%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
14h 19min

Pros

+ 扎实的做工
+ 别致的外壳
+ 良好的性能值
+ 无PWM的屏幕
+ 120赫兹的流畅操作
+ 良好的指纹识别器
+ 快速内存
+ 4K视频录制

Cons

- 运行时间相对较短
- 不含充电器
- 屏幕亮度适中
- 相机的清晰度有待提高

结论 -Galaxy M33的光和影

在审查中。三星Galaxy M33。测试设备由:
在审查中。三星Galaxy M33。测试设备由:
笔记本billiger.com

三星的Galaxy M33 5G跃升到新的移动时代,并提供了比其前辈更多的动力。存储速度终于令人信服,智能手机的制造质量也令人满意。此外,这款手机在很长一段时间内都有更新供应。

相机在这个价格范围内比较一般,显示屏比较暗,反应时间长。当你将该手机与价格相近的智能手机进行比较时,电池运行时间也不完全令人信服,而且手机在负载下会发热。

Galaxy M33 5G是一款造型别致、价格低廉的5G手机,其已经大幅下降的价格使其具有吸引力。三星将不得不在一些方面改进继任者,如电池寿命和屏幕。

喜欢AMOLED屏幕的用户在Galaxy M33的价位上有广泛的选择,而且不必没有5G:内部的 Galaxy A33 5G一加北方CE 2都可以使用。

价格和可用性

甚至三星,将价格降至到299欧元。如果你喜欢从值得信赖的互联网零售商那里购买,在测试时你可以得到250欧元起的优惠。

另外amazon.de和我们的借阅者notebooksbilliger.de都有这款手机。

Samsung Galaxy M33 5G - 07/25/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
71 / 75 → 95%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
49 / 70 → 70%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
84%
Games Performance
39 / 64 → 61%
Application Performance
70 / 86 → 81%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
60 / 90 → 67%
Camera
60%
Average
75%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy M33 5G智能手机评论--120赫兹在中档手机中是否足够?
Florian Schmitt, 2022-07-27 (Update: 2022-07-27)