Notebookcheck Logo

智能手机回顾。三星Galaxy M13 - 带有Wi-Fi 5和全高清的预算手机

看起来很锋利。 虽然仍然使用相同的SoC,但在屏幕分辨率方面,三星Galaxy M13终于赶上了同等价位的手机。继续阅读,看看它的摄像头是否比它的前辈拍得更好,以及在我们的评论中,这款廉价的智能手机的表现如何。
Android ARM Smartphone
三星Galaxy M13
Samsung Galaxy M13 (Galaxy M Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 850 8 x - 2 GHz, Cortex-A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G52 MP1
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixel 400 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, PLS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 55 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD (dedicated, up to 1TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, compass, virtual light sensor, virtual proximity sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 165.4 x 76.9
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase detection AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/​30fps (camera 1); 5.0MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.2
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, USB-C cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.447W/​kg (head), 1.360W/​kg (body) , fanless
Weight
192 g
Price
189 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

与可能的竞争对手比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

案例和特点--虚拟传感器

虽然前身三星Galaxy M12是一款体面的经济型智能手机,但它提供的性能太少,而且屏幕分辨率低。它的主摄像头制作的视频也没有给我们留下深刻印象。三星Galaxy M13已经解决了这些批评的一些问题,现在提供了一个全高清屏幕和部分新的相机设置。

Galaxy M13仍然与它的前辈分享一些设计元素。例如,后部仍然有一个微妙的波浪形图案,但放弃了垂直线。这一次,三星提供的手机有 "深绿"、"浅蓝 "和 "橙铜 "三种颜色。

塑料外壳是这个价格范围内的典型手机,但它的结构非常好,材料之间的过渡很柔和。压力几乎无法传到屏幕上。

Galaxy M13的价格约为190欧元(169英镑),64GB的存储空间比以前的型号便宜10欧元。你还可以在互联网上找到128GB的变体,价格高出20欧元左右。这两种型号都配备了4GB的内存。

和它的前辈一样,这款手机支持NFC--对于200欧元以下的设备来说,这仍然不一定是必然的。例如,如果你想使用谷歌支付或其他非接触式应用,就需要NFC。

Galaxy M13的一个独特功能是其虚拟光线和接近传感器。这款手机没有单独的传感器来控制屏幕亮度或在通话时关闭显示屏,而是使用前置摄像头和软件解决方案来检测相应的情况。在检测照明条件时,结果很平庸,因为传感器对非常强烈的环境光反应缓慢或根本没有反应。另一方面,在通话过程中,近距离感应的工作相当可靠。

即使设备中有两张SIM卡,microSD读卡器仍可使用,就速度而言,在这个价格范围内是平均水平。

三星Galaxy M13
三星Galaxy M13
三星Galaxy M13
三星Galaxy M13
三星Galaxy M13
三星Galaxy M13

尺寸比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "0" not supported!
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
  (Angelbird V60)
34.3 MB/s ∼100% +20%
Samsung Galaxy M13
  (Angelbird V60)
28.5 MB/s ∼83%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.9 - 59.2, n=99, last 2 years)
26.3 MB/s ∼77% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
24.74 MB/s ∼72% -13%
Motorola Moto G31
  (Angelbird V60)
17.7 MB/s ∼52% -38%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M13 Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø31 (18.9-38.9)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.4 (25.6-49.1)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø30.8 (17.6-38.8)
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø35 (24.2-45.6)
Samsung Galaxy M13 Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø49.7 (31.5-53.6)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø76.4 (38.4-81.8)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø50 (37.9-54.4)
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.7 (37.3-82.8)

连接性、软件和可用性--Wi-Fi 5终于来了

与Galaxy M12相比,新手机已经升级到Wi-Fi 5,即使在这个价格类别中也是逾期的。在我们使用参考路由器华硕ROG AXE11000的测试中,我们成功获得了约325 Mbits/s的稳定速度。

在移动网络覆盖方面,这款手机最高支持LTE,但频率不多。这意味着,你无法确定在国外时是否能够使用移动互联网。我们随机测试了该智能手机的接收质量,发现它几乎不能与更昂贵的手机相提并论。偶尔,Galaxy M13的信号强度只有同一地点的其他手机的一半左右。

在Galaxy M13上,三星安装了Android 12,上面有他们自己的One UI覆盖,其中有一些设计上的变化,方便单手使用手机。三星在许多领域使用自己的应用程序,但至少已经停止在其应用程序之上预装具有类似功能的谷歌应用程序(除了新闻应用程序和画廊)。虽然这款手机预装了广告应用,但其中只有极少数。

触摸屏的使用精度很高。指纹传感器被内置在手机右侧的待机按钮上。它对已注册的手指有正确的反应,并在瞬间解锁手机。你还可以使用面部识别来解锁手机。这项功能工作起来没有任何问题;但是,它是一个纯粹的基于软件的解决方案,因此没有那么安全。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Motorola Moto G31
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
346 (334min - 352max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
Motorola Moto G31
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
353 (261min - 359max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
356 (293min - 370max) MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Samsung Galaxy M13
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
328 (286min - 348max) MBit/s ∼92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
322 (162min - 386max) MBit/s ∼90% -2%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
328 (300min - 339max) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M13
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
325 (301min - 333max) MBit/s ∼99%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
298 (198min - 345max) MBit/s ∼91% -8%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø325 (301-333)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø328 (286-348)

照相机 - 浑浊的广角图像

用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

三星已经取消了用于拍摄人像的深度摄像头,这个摄像头的效用令人怀疑。相反,Galaxy M13现在拥有一个5000万像素的主摄像头,一个500万像素的广角摄像头和一个200万像素的微距摄像头。


主摄像头使用三星Isocell JN1传感器。它的像素相当小,但将其中的四个像素分装成一个较大的像素,以拍摄1250万像素的图像,具有良好的感光性。照片的锐度和细节充其量是平均水平。植物上的白花明显曝光过度。较大的区域显得有些颗粒感,在低光和高对比度的情况下,蜡烛的火焰曝光过度。虽然在非常黑暗的区域看不到任何细节,但相机能够很好地再现细节。

这款手机可以录制高达1080p和30fps的视频。然而,在拍摄视频时,只有数字变焦可用。迟缓的自动对焦仍然是该手机视频录制能力的最大问题,否则对于这个价格范围内的手机来说是不错的。

500万像素的广角镜头能拍出可接受的照片,边缘的失真得到了很好的纠正。在图片的左边边缘可以看到一条明显的软化带,右边的树木也同样非常模糊。

800万像素的前置摄像头在正常照明条件下能拍出好照片。然而,在较暗的地方,它很难再现细节。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera BlumeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightWeitwinkelkamera
click to load images
ColorChecker
21.6 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
21 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
17 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
21 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M13: 16.1 ∆E min: 3.74 - max: 29.42 ∆E
ColorChecker
29 ∆E
49.8 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
42.2 ∆E
56.8 ∆E
48.4 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
56.2 ∆E
58.6 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
67 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
40.1 ∆E
67.5 ∆E
64.6 ∆E
48.5 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M13: 41.89 ∆E min: 13.55 - max: 67.45 ∆E

显示屏--现在是全高清,但色彩暗淡

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

Galaxy M系列中终于有了一款廉价的手机,它具有全高清屏幕。在这个部门,三星有可能被竞争者甩在身后。然而,小米和摩托罗拉等制造商同时已经在这个价格类别的手机上配备了OLED显示屏,而三星仍在坚持使用PLS面板。

因此,Galaxy M13的显示屏有些暗淡,对比度比一些竞争对手低。正如我们使用分光光度计和CalMAN软件进行的测试所显示的那样,色彩再现的准确性也大大降低。在显示灰色阴影时,屏幕也有明显的蓝色调。

418
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 481 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 444.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.45 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 481 cd/m²
Contrast: 1119:1 (Black: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.55 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.233
Samsung Galaxy M13
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Motorola Moto G31
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Response Times
92%
-59%
68%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
27 ?(14, 13)
1.135 ?(1.121, 1.148)
96%
47 ?(27, 20)
-74%
6 ?(3, 3)
78%
Response Time Black / White *
14 ?(9, 5)
1.635 ?(0.831, 0.8045)
88%
20 ?(9, 11)
-43%
6 ?(3, 3)
57%
PWM Frequency
171.4
223.2
Screen
57%
5%
25%
Brightness middle
481
702
46%
553
15%
423
-12%
Brightness
444
701
58%
506
14%
425
-4%
Brightness Distribution
85
98
15%
87
2%
94
11%
Black Level *
0.43
0.44
-2%
Contrast
1119
1257
12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.55
1
78%
4.64
-2%
1.58
65%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.86
2.3
71%
7.86
-0%
4.68
40%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.5
1.4
75%
5.6
-2%
2.7
51%
Gamma
2.233 99%
2.2 100%
2.18 101%
2.219 99%
CCT
7969 82%
6520 100%
8002 81%
6674 97%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
75% / 66%
-27% / -8%
47% / 36%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19959 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼的色彩准确性
卡尔曼的色彩准确性
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命--在性能上有所欠缺

我们认为三星Exynos 850在Galaxy M12中对其价格范围来说是足够的。然而,一年后,Galaxy M13中的相同SoC与小米Redmi Note 11中的Snapdragon 680相比,显然太慢。

在我们的基准测试中,性能差异达到40%、50%甚至70%,很明显这款手机在性能方面落后了很多。例如,当你重新启动手机时,这一点很明显:手机需要很长时间才能重新变得真正可用。在日常使用中,我们也不建议在Galaxy M13上运行要求过高的应用程序。否则,手机将开始出现明显的卡顿。这部分是由于非常缓慢的eMMC存储造成的。

在负载的情况下,智能手机只在某些部分略微发热,因此使用起来仍然很舒适。

扬声器听起来相当单薄,无法应对音乐曲目中更强大的部分。虽然它至少在全音量时不会发出嗡嗡声,但扬声器在全部打开时也不是很响。

在手机上听音乐时,使用一副耳机或外部扬声器会更令人愉快。它们可以通过3.5毫米音频插孔或蓝牙连接。这款手机支持一个不错的蓝牙编解码器(包括aptX)的选择。然而,它们都不具备高清音频的能力,这意味着声音质量相当一般。

三星没有为这款经济型手机配备任何充电器。这款手机的最大充电速度为15瓦,需要2小时才能将其5000毫安时的大电池充满。在完全充电的情况下,在电池耗尽之前,你将能够浏览互联网近15个小时。因此,根据使用情况,这款手机应该能够持续两天而无需充电。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
119 Points ∼17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
384 Points ∼56% +223%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
155 Points ∼23% +30%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
353 Points ∼52% +197%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (119 - 183, n=6)
165.8 Points ∼24% +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=270, last 2 years)
685 Points ∼100% +476%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
519 Points ∼23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1738 Points ∼78% +235%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
586 Points ∼26% +13%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1295 Points ∼58% +150%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (519 - 1087, n=6)
874 Points ∼39% +68%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=270, last 2 years)
2230 Points ∼100% +330%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
4894 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
7694 Points ∼75% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
4966 Points ∼49% +1%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6596 Points ∼65% +35%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (4894 - 6065, n=4)
5416 Points ∼53% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=172, last 2 years)
10218 Points ∼100% +109%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
887 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1365 Points ∼54% +54%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
888 Points ∼35% 0%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1408 Points ∼56% +59%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (861 - 912, n=6)
879 Points ∼35% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=184, last 2 years)
2506 Points ∼100% +183%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
768 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1188 Points ∼46% +55%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
771 Points ∼30% 0%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1246 Points ∼48% +62%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (738 - 788, n=6)
758 Points ∼29% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=184, last 2 years)
2586 Points ∼100% +237%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1930 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2683 Points ∼93% +39%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1899 Points ∼66% -2%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2578 Points ∼90% +34%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (1899 - 2037, n=6)
1979 Points ∼69% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=184, last 2 years)
2877 Points ∼100% +49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
920 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1372 Points ∼33% +49%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
916 Points ∼22% 0%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1430 Points ∼35% +55%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (866 - 920, n=6)
893 Points ∼22% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11909, n=244, last 2 years)
4111 Points ∼100% +347%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
793 Points ∼15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1199 Points ∼23% +51%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
791 Points ∼15% 0%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1267 Points ∼24% +60%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (736 - 793, n=6)
766 Points ∼15% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 20955, n=244, last 2 years)
5248 Points ∼100% +562%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2084 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2573 Points ∼79% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2054 Points ∼63% -1%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2603 Points ∼80% +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (2042 - 2168, n=6)
2102 Points ∼64% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=244, last 2 years)
3274 Points ∼100% +57%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
507 Points ∼16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
447 Points ∼14% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
513 Points ∼17% +1%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
719 Points ∼23% +42%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (422 - 513, n=5)
460 Points ∼15% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=201, last 2 years)
3101 Points ∼100% +512%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
509 Points ∼15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
435 Points ∼13% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
509 Points ∼15% 0%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
717 Points ∼21% +41%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (423 - 509, n=5)
459 Points ∼13% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 11700, n=206, last 2 years)
3420 Points ∼100% +572%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
139 Points ∼14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
127 Points ∼13% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
139 Points ∼14% 0%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
181 Points ∼18% +30%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (116 - 139, n=4)
128.3 Points ∼13% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 3080, n=162, last 2 years)
996 Points ∼100% +617%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
139 Points ∼14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
124 Points ∼13% -11%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
180 Points ∼18% +29%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (117 - 139, n=3)
124.3 Points ∼13% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=157, last 2 years)
985 Points ∼100% +609%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
5.3 fps ∼18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
8.8 fps ∼30% +66%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
5.3 fps ∼18% 0%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8.4 fps ∼28% +58%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (5.3 - 12, n=6)
9.43 fps ∼32% +78%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.7 - 104, n=265, last 2 years)
29.5 fps ∼100% +457%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
6.1 fps ∼17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
9.8 fps ∼28% +61%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
6.1 fps ∼17% 0%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.6 fps ∼27% +57%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (6.1 - 6.2, n=6)
6.17 fps ∼18% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 136, n=266, last 2 years)
35.2 fps ∼100% +477%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
3.3 fps ∼16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5 fps ∼24% +52%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
3.3 fps ∼16% 0%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5.4 fps ∼26% +64%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (3.3 - 7.4, n=6)
5.88 fps ∼29% +78%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3 - 69, n=266, last 2 years)
20.5 fps ∼100% +521%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2.2 fps ∼16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3.2 fps ∼24% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2.2 fps ∼16% 0%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.5 fps ∼26% +59%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (2.2 - 2.2, n=6)
2.2 fps ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 52, n=266, last 2 years)
13.5 fps ∼100% +514%
Samsung Galaxy M13Xiaomi Redmi Note 11Samsung Galaxy A13 4GMotorola Moto G31Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
288%
77%
98%
9%
295%
Sequential Read 256KB
264.5
895.34
239%
308.5
17%
309.8
17%
273 ?(95.6 - 704, n=190)
3%
950 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=263, last 2 years)
259%
Sequential Write 256KB
193.5
519.23
168%
236.8
22%
221.5
14%
176.8 ?(40 - 274, n=190)
-9%
503 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=263, last 2 years)
160%
Random Read 4KB
42.5
172.95
307%
104.4
146%
84
98%
58.7 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=190)
38%
171.7 ?(13.5 - 345, n=263, last 2 years)
304%
Random Write 4KB
30.3
163.29
439%
67.3
122%
109.8
262%
31 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=190)
2%
168.2 ?(30.3 - 475, n=264, last 2 years)
455%

温度

Max. Load
 36.6 °C31.7 °C31.9 °C 
 38.2 °C31.8 °C32.3 °C 
 37.5 °C31.9 °C32.2 °C 
Maximum: 38.2 °C
Average: 33.8 °C
31.1 °C33.4 °C35.5 °C
31.8 °C34 °C40.8 °C
31.5 °C33.4 °C41.1 °C
Maximum: 41.1 °C
Average: 34.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热图前沿
热图前沿
热图后部
热图后部

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.740.22535.739.43127.331.44033.330.35037.434.16325.227.48018.220.710020.522.712513.520.116017.331.720013.538.525013.544.931513.149.840012.952.650013.359.563015.460.880014.160.9100012.96712509.671.6160010.671.5200010.372.325001172.7315012.673400015.267.5500016.857.9630016.465.4800016.565.71000016.668.21250015.961.81600016.649.7SPL26.381.4N0.746.6median 13.5median 60.9Delta1.910.5404532.434.927.626.729.930.534.935.32727.917.821.814.222.313.32910.236.18.842.79.648.57.351.77.354.89.261.712.962.117.362.912.969.710.967.79.77210.267.611.665.71370.113.968.715.266.815.770.215.873.417.166.516.163.716.658.225.880.70.748.5median 12.9median 63.72.88.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy M13Motorola Moto G31
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy M13 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Motorola Moto G31 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Motorola Moto G31
5000 mAh
1032 min ∼39% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (424 - 1953, n=271, last 2 years)
906 min ∼34% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M13
5000 mAh
895 min ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
5000 mAh
864 min ∼33% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
5000 mAh
842 min ∼32% -6%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
14h 55min

Pros

+ 坚固的、制作精良的机身
+ 专用的microSD读卡器
+ NFC
+ 非常灵敏的指纹传感器
+ 良好的电池寿命

Cons

- 不可靠的虚拟光传感器
- 只支持少数几个LTE频率
- 一些预装的广告应用程序
- 平庸的扬声器
- 视频模式下的自动对焦迟缓
- 系统性能低下
- 屏幕有蓝色的色调

结论 - 明显改善,但在某些方面有所欠缺

审查。三星Galaxy M13。
审查。三星Galaxy M13。

三星Galaxy M13的价格比上一代产品略低,但却提供了一些更新:特别是,高分辨率的屏幕是一个受欢迎的变化,尽管它仍然是一个看起来有点沉闷的PLS面板。

相机的自动对焦仍然不能很好地处理视频,而且我们并不完全建议太仔细地检查广角相机的照片。尽管如此,对于这个价格范围内的手机来说,主摄像头的图像质量绝对可以接受。


三星真的需要给下一个预算Galaxy M手机更多的性能,因为Galaxy M13在这方面已经明显落后于其他制造商的类似价格的设备。

三星Galaxy M13提供了一个良好的底盘,支持NFC和快速Wi-Fi。然而,在性能和屏幕方面仍有更好的选择。

如果你喜欢明亮和充满活力的OLED屏幕,那么小米Redmi Note 11可能是你更好的选择。如果高分辨率的屏幕对你来说不是那么重要,那么你可能也想考虑一下前辈Galaxy M12,现在可以用更便宜的价格买到。

价格和可用性

三星Galaxy M13可从 英国亚马逊或制造商的网上商店,价格为169英镑。128GB版本目前还没有在英国上市。

Samsung Galaxy M13 - 07/12/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
83%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
90%
Connectivity
45 / 70 → 65%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
84%
Games Performance
8 / 64 → 13%
Application Performance
58 / 86 → 67%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
50 / 90 → 56%
Camera
52%
Average
70%
76%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 智能手机回顾。三星Galaxy M13 - 带有Wi-Fi 5和全高清的预算手机
Florian Schmitt, 2022-07-16 (Update: 2022-07-16)