Samsung Galaxy A Series

Graphics Adapter: unknown, ARM Mali-G52 MP1, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, Imagination PowerVR GE8100, Imagination PowerVR GE8320, PowerVR GE8322 / IMG8322, Qualcomm Adreno 506, Qualcomm Adreno 610, Qualcomm Adreno 618, Qualcomm Adreno 619, Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Display: 6.40 inch, 6.50 inch, 6.60 inch, 6.70 inch
Weight: 0.179kg, 0.181kg, 0.185kg, 0.186kg, 0.189kg, 0.193kg, 0.195kg, 0.196kg, 0.203kg, 0.205kg, 0.206kg, 0.211kg
Price: 110, 120, 160, 165, 170, 179, 189, 200, 229, 250, 369, 409, 429, 449, 469, 600 euro
Average of 409 scores (from 988 reviews)
Samsung Galaxy A71
Specifications

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 730
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 618
Display: 6.70 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.179kg
Price: 469 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
A 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display, an octa-core Snapdragon 730 SoC and quad rear-facing cameras with a 64 MP main shooter all make the Galaxy A71 sound good on paper. Samsung's new mid-range smartphone packs plenty of other features into its large case too, but our tests will show whether it is enough to trouble the established order.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Central

The Galaxy A71 builds on the success of last year's A70 with upgraded internals and a new 64MP camera that takes great photos. The design has been refreshed, you get incredible battery life with 25W fast charging, and the 6.7-inch AMOLED panel is one of the best in this category. As an overall package, the Galaxy A71 is one of the best mid-range phones you'll find today.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a solid mid-range device that competes well with others in its class. It offers an excellent screen with solid battery life and speedy performance. At half the cost of flagships, you'd hardly know it's not a top-flight phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 700%
Source: Android Central

The Galaxy A71 builds on the success of last year's A70 with upgraded internals and a new 64MP camera that takes great photos. The design has been refreshed for 2020, you get incredible battery life with 25W fast charging, and the 6.7-inch AMOLED panel is one of the best in this category. As an overall package, the Galaxy A71 is one of the best mid-range phones you'll find in 2020.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/18/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Ausdroid

If that’s above your budget and you were considering the A51 instead, don’t. I tried the A51 for a day and the A70/A71 are much more responsive, smooth and speedy to use compared to A51 model. The A70/A71 also have a vastly better in screen fingerprint reader than the A51. Australian stock of the Samsung A70 is still being sold by Mobileciti for $549.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/27/2020
Source: Phone Arena

The Galaxy A71 offers most of what's great about flagship Samsung phones for a lower price. Unless top-of-the-line features and specs are absolutely needed, this is arguably the perfect Android smartphone for most people, as it should check the necessary boxes for all but the most hardcore Android users. It offers solid performance, long battery life, plenty of camera options and even a headphone jack, while possible downsides for some may be its plastic back, mediocre single speaker and its tall screen aspect ratio.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Mobile Syrup

The Galaxy A71 was a solid smartphone that offers a top-tier performance, especially considering it’s a mid-range handset. While my current favourite smartphone on the market is the S20+, the A71 delivered an experience that Is strikingly similar for a fraction of the cost.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/18/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Central

The Galaxy A71 builds on the success of last year's A70 with upgraded internals and a new 64MP camera that takes great photos. The design has been refreshed for 2020, you get incredible battery life with 25W fast charging, and the 6.7-inch AMOLED panel is one of the best in this category. As an overall package, the Galaxy A71 is one of the best mid-range phones you'll find in 2020.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: DxOMark

The Samsung Galaxy A71’s front camera is capable of capturing decent selfie images and video in most conditions. Its single-lens fixed-focus camera is not quite on the same level as current high-end devices with autofocus-systems and more efficient stabilization, but the Samsung is one of the better mid-rangers we have tested under our Selfie protocol. This said, if you are after top-end front camera performance in a mid-range device, the Huawei nova 6 5G currently remains your best option.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/06/2020
Source: DxOMark

While Samsung’s mid-range A-series devices aren’t meant to rival the manufacturer’s excellent photography of its flagship models, the new A71 doesn’t really improve on the A9 we tested a year ago. From both the main and ultra-wide cameras you can expect well-exposed images in good light, excellent dynamic range and well-saturated color, but blue color casts can also make outdoor images disappointing.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/10/2020
Source: Tech Nave

For RM1799, I think the Galaxy A71 is one of the better mid-range devices for mobile gaming. Hardcore mobile gamers are always looking for the best tech specs for the glory of graphics and this phone is no exception. Let me just say this - as a PC gamer and a big fan of mobile gaming phones, I was genuinely impressed with how the Galaxy A71 handled mobile gaming, so it might do the same for you too.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2020
Source: Sam Mobile

We loved the Galaxy A70, and the Galaxy A71 brings some neat upgrades. Its performance is notably better thanks to the newer Snapdragon chip, the display has been upgraded to an Infinity-O panel, there’s a higher-resolution main camera and a macro camera at the back, and you get Android 10 and One UI 2.0 out of the box. The A71’s design is excellent, and there’s not a lot it doesn’t do well.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/02/2020
Source: Unbox

The Galaxy A71 is an excellent overall smartphone with touches of what makes Samsung flagships great. It’s a gorgeous device with some of the best mid-range hardware plus a set of decent shooters to boot.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/21/2020
Source: Gogi.in

Samsung Galaxy A71 is another mid-premium smartphone powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 octa core processor and packed with quad cameras (64MP Primary), 4500 mAh battery with 25W fast charging support and priced at Rs. 29,999.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: NLT

All in all, I am unable to recommend one smartphone over the other. They both do share some similarities, but the price scales alongside the performance, camera, and overall battery capacity. For example, if you want to play games on your smartphone – then the Galaxy A71 is great. Else, the Galaxy A51 is fine too.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 02/19/2020
Source: GSM Arena

With Xiaomi and Realme aggressively launching phones with flagship-grade specs, it's a tough job being a mid-ranger these days. We do believe the A71 has a bright future though, as its price will soon go down, while many carriers will subsidize it enough to make it an attractive purchase.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Yugatech

Samsung launched its newest mid-range device, The Galaxy A71, in-line with that we did our quick hands-on video a couple of days ago. After spending some quality time with this device we are now ready to give our full thoughts on the Galaxy A71.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/13/2020
Source: Yugatech

The panel is bright and offers vivid colors, performance is pretty smooth, the battery life is impressive, and it produces decent photos with both the rear and front cameras. With its price tag of PHP 22,990, you might want to consider this competent mid-range smartphone in your options.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/11/2020
Source: Unbox

Before the highly-anticipated launch of the Galaxy S20 series and Galaxy Z Flip, Samsung brought its next-generation Galaxy A series to the Philippines first. The Galaxy A71 is our first look at Samsung’s new design language for its phones, retaining the Galaxy A70’s big screen while adding better hardware in the form of a new camera module and processor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/05/2020
Source: Hitech Century

The Samsung Galaxy A71 compares favourably against other midrange phones and brings a lot to the table, offering a massive and vibrant Super AMOLED display, a good rear quad camera, expandable memory, an audio jack and above all, superb battery life, all at a price under RM1,800.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/02/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 60%
Source: Hitech Century

Our test unit lacked the box and any other accessories that would typically come with it so we can’t comment on how much extra value you get but for its intended asking price at about under RM2,000, the Galaxy A71 is a good looking midranger indeed.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/31/2020
Source: Hitech Century

Keeping it juiced is a large 4,500mAh battery with 25W fast charging via a USB Type-C port. In Malaysia, the Galaxy A71 ships in three colours – Prism Crush Silver, Prism Crush Black and Prism Crush Blue. The chassis is also done up in glasstic so it has properties akin to the A51, with a light carry weight and a mirrored finish that bears up to casual inspection. No word on price or exact launch dates yet but we’ll keep you posted.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 01/18/2020
Source: Trusted Reviews

This is a mid-range phone that is really trying to outmuscle its £420 price and go big. It’s got a large 6.7-inch display, fast 25w charging for a big battery and a 64MP main camera. It’s not the prettiest phone around, but if you’re into watching media on the go and shooting video then you’ll find a lot to like here.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/11/2020
Source: Tech Advisor

The A71’s appeal will depend heavily on price, but if it’s similar to the A70 then Samsung will be onto a winner. The core spec here is really solid, and the compromises - plastic back, HD display, no wireless charging or waterproofing - are all on points that are less important to most users. If you can ignore the appeal of the S-series branding on the S10 Lite, the A71 looks like the phone to beat in Samsung’s mid-tier offering.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/10/2020
Source: Techradar

The Samsung Galaxy A71 has plenty going for it, from its big screen and power to the feature-packed cameras and massive battery - this could well be a winning formula at an attractive price point.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/08/2020
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Chinahandys.net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2020
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: A1 Blog

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/22/2020
Source: Curved

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/16/2020
Source: Blick

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/24/2020
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 84% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Andro 4 All

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/16/2020
Rating: Total score: 81%
Source: Profesional Review

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2020
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 80% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80%
Source: Hipertextual

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/05/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: El Androide Libre

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/05/2020
Source: Tuexperto

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/03/2020
Source: Xataka

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/28/2020
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 85% display: 93% mobility: 93% workmanship: 85%
Source: PC Guia

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 70%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/09/2020
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/10/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% display: 90% mobility: 88% workmanship: 71%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 63% features: 84%
Source: Tutto Android

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/08/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 84%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 65% features: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Computer Totaal

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/11/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Diskidee.nl

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/03/2020
Source: 01Net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/17/2020
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 70% mobility: 100%
Source: Fredzone

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 85% display: 85% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/02/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Top for Phone

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/01/2020
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/10/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/13/2020
Source: 90 Sekund

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/19/2020
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 60% features: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/21/2020
Source: Android.com.pl

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/07/2020
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 90%
Source: Antyweb

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/07/2020
Source: Chip Online TR

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2020
Rating: Total score: 92%
Source: Log.com.tr

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Hitech Vesti

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/18/2020
Source: Mega Obzor

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/02/2020
Source: Smartmania.cz

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/11/2020
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 85% features: 81% mobility: 89% workmanship: 84%
Source: Smartmania.cz

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/11/2020
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 85% features: 81% mobility: 89% workmanship: 84%
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/08/2020
Source: FPT shop

Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 08/11/2020
Source: Zing

Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 08/01/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/08/2020
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/27/2020
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2020
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/29/2020
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/25/2020
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/12/2020
Source: Cell Phones

Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 03/10/2020
Source: Cell Phones

Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 03/10/2020
Source: Danviet

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/08/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/25/2020
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2020
Source: FPT shop

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 02/22/2020
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/22/2020
Source: Techtimes.vn

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/20/2020
Source: VNReview

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/18/2020
Source: Tinh Te

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/14/2020
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/12/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/10/2020
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/10/2020
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/03/2020
Source: Danviet

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/01/2020
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/01/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/28/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/22/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/15/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/15/2020
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/15/2020
Source: Zing

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/14/2020
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/14/2020
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/14/2020
Source: Alt om Data

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 83% performance: 67%
Source: Mobil DK

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 60%
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 76% display: 80%
Source: Playtech.ro

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/31/2020
Source: Computerblog.ro

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/12/2020
Source: Puhelinvertailu

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/18/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G
Specifications

Processor: unknown
Graphics Adapter: unknown
Display: 6.70 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.185kg
Price: 600 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a solid mid-range device that competes well with others in its class. It offers an excellent screen with solid battery life and speedy performance. At half the cost of flagships, you'd hardly know it's not a top-flight phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: DxOMark

The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G (Snapdragon) could appeal to buyers looking for 5G speeds on a budget, as well as those who appreciate its large AMOLED screen. But when it comes to camera performance, this phone is a harder sell, mainly because the competition in the mid-range segment is so fierce. Although it’s a substantial upgrade in terms of imaging over its older down-market sibling, the Galaxy A50, the A71 5G’s street price puts it up against some very capable phones from other makers that provide generally better photo and video quality across the board. Buyers who simply want a nimble, affordable Samsung phone with a nice screen won’t be disappointed, but those who prioritize camera performance should carefully consider other handsets in the same price bracket before opting for the A71 5G.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/16/2020
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a solid mid-range device that competes well with others in its class. It offers an excellent screen with solid battery life and speedy performance. At half the cost of flagships, you'd hardly know it's not a top-flight phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: PC Mag

The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a good phone for 5G on a (relative) budget, with solid performance all around. It also costs $100 less and has a much better camera than the 5G-capable Moto Edge. That said, we'd like to see better durability for $600, and unless you buy the phone on Verizon, you're not getting a future-proof 5G experience. And with the $500 Moto One 5G launching on AT&T and Verizon soon, the competition is really heating up. So while the Galaxy A71 gets most things right, you might want to sit tight to see how things shake out before picking one up.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/02/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide

The Samsung Galaxy A71 offers a cheaper path to 5G service if that’s important to you, but otherwise it’s only a decent $600 phone. For hundreds less, the Pixel 4a and iPhone SE are better in almost every respect, save for battery life, while the OnePlus Nord is a much more well-rounded sub-$500 5G option for those who can buy it.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/17/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Specifications

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 750G 5G
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 619
Display: 6.60 inch, 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.193kg
Price: 369 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
One of the Koreans' most popular mid-range models is now also being equipped with the fastest mobile network standard to date. In addition, there's more storage, a bigger battery, and a macro camera compared to the predecessor. However, we'll also have to cover the steps taken backwards by the device in this review...
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Authority

Samsung mostly covered its bases with the Galaxy A42. The phone is a solid package that offers a lot in the way of functionality. It boasts an appealing design that may not be for everyone, but at least it stands out as unique. The screen is big and bright, even if it is lower resolution than some competitors. The processor delivers the everyday performance people demand, though it is a bit on the sluggish side when it comes to intense gaming. Battery life is the big winner here, which benefits from the screen and processor combination. You can count on two full days of usage from this phone, which is more than most other handsets offer, though charging speeds aren’t the quickest. There’s a very welcome headphone jack and though the speaker is a mono affair it delivers solid sound. Memory card support is also a nice bonus alongside the 128GB of built-in storage. Overall though, the Samsung Galaxy A42 struggles to truly carve a niche among tough competition. Plenty of ~$400 phones swim in the same sea and have better screens and cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: PC Mag

Each year, Samsung’s Galaxy A-series lineup gets a little better, but there’s always an awkward outlier. This year, it’s the Samsung Galaxy A42 5G. Yes, it offers millimeter-wave 5G, but that isn't enough to make up for its shortcomings. With sluggish performance, unimpressive cameras, and a low-res display, the Galaxy A42 5G doesn't stand out from the competition and simply isn't a good value at $400. For an extra $50, the Google Pixel 5a With 5G is miles better, with a sharper display, clearer cameras, and superior software, making it our Editors' Choice award winner for midrange phones. If you're looking to spend less, meanwhile, Samsung's own Galaxy A32 5G is our Editors’ Choice winner for affordable models, and offers much better value for the money than the A42.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/14/2021
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: The Verge

If you think you’ll want a little more than the A42 5G has to offer, then the $500 A52 5G is a good step-up option with a bit of a better camera, a great high refresh rate screen, and the added peace of mind of IP-rated waterproofing. If you can find a Pixel 4A 5G in stock anywhere, that would be another good alternative at $500 with a better camera, faster processor, and cleaner software. It offers a smaller 6.2-inch screen, though, and again, you’ll have a hard time finding one new at this point since its successor, the Pixel 5A, will likely be arriving in the near future. If none of the above suits you, then the A42 5G really isn’t a bad choice. Its healthy support policy, decent overall performance, and robust battery life make it one of the best options from Verizon for around $400. Just don’t get too excited about mmWave.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Android Police

After spending more time with it, I’ve grown to love the Samsung Galaxy A42’s striking design. This is a shiny phone, almost metallic-looking in person, but it also offers an iridescent reflection peppered with an eye-catching dot pattern. I know it's a silly thing to highlight, and yet for me, it makes all of the difference. I still notice how compelling this phone looks a month later, which I didn't expect from a middle-of-the-road Samsung device. It's a stunner, no bones about it.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Central

The 5,000mAh battery will let you get two full days out of the A42 — even when you're having to bounce between 4G, Sub6, and UWB on Verizon. The screen is vivid and easy to read outdoors, but the triple-camera setup here is a distinct downgrade from other A-series offerings.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Authority

Samsung mostly covered its bases with the Galaxy A42. The phone is a solid package that offers a lot in the way of functionality. It boasts an appealing design that may not be for everyone, but at least it stands out as unique. The screen is big and bright, even if it is lower resolution than some competitors. There’s a very welcome headphone jack and though the speaker is a mono affair it delivers solid sound. Memory card support is also a nice bonus alongside the 128GB of built-in storage. Overall though, the Samsung Galaxy A42 struggles to truly carve a niche among tough competition. Plenty of ~$400 phones swim in the same sea and have better screens and cameras. If there’s one reason to champion the Galaxy A42 above its peers, it is surely battery life. Buy the A42 for its stellar battery power over any other reason.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tech2.in.com

But you also need to consider that, while its a good smartphone overall, the Rs 21,999 price tag still feels unfair, just for the added 5G connectivity, especially when Samsung has cut some corners with the HD+ display. In the same price segment, Samsung’s own Galaxy M32 or M31, Galaxy M51, Galaxy F62 are good alternatives. And if you are looking for smartphones outside of Samsung, then the Poco X3 Pro, OnePlus Nord/Nord CE, Redmi Note 10 Pro Max, Motorola G60, iQoo 3, Mi 10i or Realme X3 SuperZoom, are all great alternatives, and some of these also offer 5G connectivity.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/08/2021
Source: Android Police

The Galaxy A42 5G I reviewed is a carrier device, but you can also grab one unlocked. If you're not married to Verizon, Samsung's cheaper A32 ($280 retail) and slightly more expensive A52 ($500 retail) may be better options, depending on what you're looking for, hence the odd positioning of the A42 in the market. Of course, there are fewer options if you want to buy a 5G Samsung phone direct from Verizon, so the A42 is easier to recommend on Big Red's network. Regardless of where you get it, the A42 5G is a solid phone that packs exceptional build quality. Performance is snappy, even though you only get 4GB of RAM, and the large battery means you'll avoid range anxiety. You can also expect expedient and long-term software support, though the massive amount of pre-installed bloatware should have lowered the price a little further, in my opinion. Also, the cameras are just good enough but don't really offer anything special.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: XDA Developers

The Galaxy A42 5G might have been a more compelling phone last year, when it was first released outside the United States, but I’m not sure it’s as good of a purchase in 2021 at $399. It’s definitely not a bad phone, with its speedy internal hardware and massive screen, but it feels like less of a value compared to other recent phones. The Galaxy A52 5G is $100 more than this phone and has a better (but still plastic) build, a display with twice the refresh rate (120Hz), and improved cameras. If you can spend the extra money, the Galaxy A52 5G is likely a better investment. On the other side of the price spectrum, the Galaxy A32 5G is Samsung’s cheapest 5G phone at $280, and isn’t much worse than the A42.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/14/2021
Source: Gadgets Now

Samsung Galaxy M42 comes with a good build quality and it also offers a powerful mid-range processor. The smartphone comes with the latest operating system and will get three more Android updates in the future. It comes with a starting price tag of Rs 21,999 which makes it an affordable 5G smartphone. In our opinion this smartphone is for the people who only want to purchase a Samsung phone. The smartphone will face stiff competition from Realme 8 5G smartphone which is available at Rs 22,999.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Sam Mobile

So, should you buy the Galaxy M42 5G? Only if you’re looking for an affordable phone with excellent gaming performance and support for 5G networks. For everything else, there are better alternatives on the market, such as the Galaxy A32. It doesn’t have 5G or great gaming performance but gets you a better display (with a 90Hz refresh rate) and main camera and similar battery life and software features.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/26/2021
Source: NDTV Gadgets

The Galaxy M42 5G is now the most affordable 5G smartphone that Samsung has on offer. It packs in a capable processor and offers good performance. However, Samsung has cut some corners with the display. An HD+ resolution at the Rs. 21,999 price point is highly disappointing. Given that 5G networks are still not available in India, you could consider the Galaxy F62 to be a worthy alternative. If you are looking specifically for a 5G-ready smartphone, the Xiaomi Mi 10i (Review)and the Realme X7 (Review) are better alternatives to the Galaxy M42 5G at this price level.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: 91mobiles

The Samsung Galaxy M42 5G starts at Rs 21,999 for the 6GB RAM variant and while the phone gets a couple of things right, the smartphone’s lacklustre display and its uninspiring design stick out like a sore thumb. What’s more, the device faces stiff competition from the likes of Xiaomi’s Mi 10i too which, pound for pound, offers better specs and performance. Lest I forget, the company’s Galaxy F62 (review) retails for around the same price too and puts forth a more well-rounded package as well. Consequently, unless you’re looking for the cheapest 5G phone from Samsung, you might want to spend your hard-earned bucks elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/14/2021
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mobygyaan

The Samsung Galaxy M42 has all that it takes to be a perfect midranger, let it be the CPU itself, the Snapdragon 750G is a king in its class, other than that is the Super AMOLED display, 5G capabilities, Android 11 out-of-the-box, the reliable battery life, and good cameras, aside from its new eye-catchy Prism design, however, the only two downsides we think are its display resolution which is the HD+ and the standard 60 Hz refresh rate, otherwise would be a strong contender in its class at this price (₹21,999). If it doesn’t bother you, this could be one of the best non-Chinese smartphones available in India.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/14/2021
Source: NDTV Gadgets

Samsung has picked a powerful processor for the Galaxy M42 5G to take the battle to the competition. While the Rs. 21,999 starting price is competitive, it does make me wonder whether Samsung has cut corners to reach it. So is the Galaxy M42 5G a smartphone worth recommending? I'll answer this in the full review, coming soon.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/07/2021
Source: Ricks Tech

Support, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2021
Source: Yugatech

If you are coming from a smartphone with a 1080p display, it might take some time to get used to the Galaxy A42 5G’s 720p display. Still, if you’re not that nitpicky when it comes to the display category, the Samsung Galaxy A42 5G is undoubtedly one of the best smartphones on this tier.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/13/2021
Source: Yugatech

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/12/2021
Source: GSM Arena

The Galaxy A42 5G is a cheap 5G mid-ranger, which excels in everything it does - gaming, browsing, multimedia, office apps, and whatnot. It has a large AMOLED screen and a beefy battery to keep whatever you are doing for quite some time. So, yes, the Galaxy A42 5G seems like a great chap.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Nave

In addition to that, the phone comes with the Samsung Knox feature, which is usually available on Samsung flagships only. It allows users to safely store personal data onto the smartphone, so it's particularly suitable for high-ranking business execs. With Knox, you can prevent information stored in the smartphone from being easily leaked.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/15/2020
Source: Tech Nave

The Samsung Galaxy A42 5G is now on sale in Malaysia at the price of RM1599. If you purchase it during this month, you will be entitled to free YouTube Premium access for two months. Of course, you will need to be a Samsung member first and activate it. To learn more about the phone, you may visit Samsung's official online store here.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/11/2020
Source: Unbox

The Samsung Galaxy A42 5G has a lot of things that we’ve come to enjoy from their other offerings and the addition of Qualcomm’s mid-range 5G-ready processor would have made it easier to recommend for people looking to prepare themselves for the expanding network in the Philippines. But this price bracket has always been contentious and it will definitely have a tough time going against other brands’ products that offer a better price to performance ratio; especially with all the compromises, they’ve made for this model.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/08/2020
Source: Chinahandys.net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% display: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 75%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: El Androide Libre

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/17/2021
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 75% display: 79% mobility: 86% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 65% features: 80% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 61% features: 67%
Source: MA Reduc

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Top for Phone

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/22/2021
Source: CNet France

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/19/2020
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 770% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 60%
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/03/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Alt om Data

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/27/2020
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: Puhelinvertailu

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Specifications

Processor: Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 6.50 inch, 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.205kg
Price: 179 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Samsung's entry-level Galaxy A12 smartphone combines a powerful 5,000 mAh battery, a large display, and a quad-camera setup with MediaTek's Helio P35 SoC. Find out if the overall concept is convincing and which compromises have to be accepted due to the low price in our review of the Galaxy phone.
Foreign Reviews
Source: CNet

I'd recommend the Galaxy A03S to anyone who wants to spend less than $200 on a new Samsung phone. Since it's the newest of the three phones, it'll get more years of software and security updates. I also found that it offered respectable performance for the price. While the A12 does take better photos, I didn't think the step up in quality was worth the extra $20. Instead, buy the A03S and invest that $20 toward the microSD card you'll need. If you wanted to check out other sub-$200 phones that aren't made by Samsung, Motorola has the $160 Moto G Pure phone and a $200 Moto G Power phone. The OnePlus Nord N200 5G goes slightly above the $200 threshold at $240, but it offers 5G connectivity.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 04/17/2022
Source: Expert Reviews

Ultimately, it’s hard not to think of the Galaxy A12 as something of a misfire by Samsung. Yes, it has phenomenal battery life, and I sincerely hope that the company adopts the two-tone look onto other handsets, but even at £169 it still misses the mark. Much of that is down to the outstanding things other manufacturers are doing on a budget, but Samsung’s entry-level handsets have been able to hold their own in the past. It’s hard not to pin the disappointment entirely on the MediaTek Helios MT6765. Exynos and Qualcomm handsets never felt this sluggish. What should you buy instead? While all of the options highlighted in the ‘price and competition’ section would be preferable, my suggestion is the Poco X3 NFC if you can stretch to £199. If you can’t, then you should pay the same £169 for a Realme 7 or save £19 and buy a Nokia 5.3.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Expert Reviews

Ultimately, it’s hard not to think of the Galaxy A12 as something of a misfire by Samsung. Yes, it has phenomenal battery life, and I sincerely hope that the company adopts the two-tone look onto other handsets, but even at £169 it still misses the mark. Much of that is down to the outstanding things other manufacturers are doing on a budget, but Samsung’s entry-level handsets have been able to hold their own in the past. It’s hard not to pin the disappointment entirely on the MediaTek Helios MT6765. Exynos and Qualcomm handsets never felt this sluggish. What should you buy instead? While all of the options highlighted in the ‘price and competition’ section would be preferable, my suggestion is the Poco X3 NFC if you can stretch to £199. If you can’t, then you should pay the same £169 for a Realme 7 or save £19 and buy a Nokia 5.3.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Ricks Tech

Support, online available, Long, Date: 09/30/2021
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A12 is a solid upgrade over the Galaxy A11 in almost every way. What this budget-friendly phone does bring to the table is a good 48MP main camera, excellent battery life, and Samsung’s crisp and attractive One UI software. Unfortunately, the peripheral cameras lack punch and the laggy performance can be frustrating, but these are expected trade-offs at this price tier. We’ve mentioned that the Galaxy A12 lands right around Motorola’s Moto G Power ($249) and Moto G Play ($169), and it’s well suited for someone buying their first smartphone. The lack of 5G limits its future prospects, though you can try out the OnePlus Nord N200 ($239) or splurge a bit on Samsung’s Galaxy A32 5G ($279) if you want to tap into top speeds. Samsung’s Galaxy A12 is also available on Verizon, US Cellular, and AT&T.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Police

Budget phones have their place, and for some, spending more than $200 on a mobile device is simply not worth it. The Galaxy A12 isn't a bad phone — in fact, it's an able road trip companion, with its giant display and a battery to match. But Samsung had to cut several corners to get the price this low, and unfortunately, performance just can't keep up with modern standards. Ultimately, the Galaxy A12 fails to find a single category where it defeats the competition. It's a phone of compromises, but one that makes all the wrong choices when cutting corners. Extra-long battery life only takes you so far when using the phone is frustratingly slow. With superior devices available for just a bit of extra cash upfront, you're better off opting for something else.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: DxOMark

The Samsung Galaxy A12 is a budget smartphone competing in the Essential segment ($200 or under). Despite the modest price point, it offers some impressive specs, including an octa-core processor, a 6.5-inch TFT display with HD+ resolution, and 64 GB of internal memory to store your photos and videos. For the rear camera, the primary module with a 48 MP sensor is assisted by a 5 MP ultra-wide, a 2 MP macro camera, and a depth sensor. Let’s see how this combo does in the DXOMARK Camera test.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/02/2021
Source: Phone Arena

It’s a fully plastic build, but we think the blue color and textured back make it quite fun to hold in hand. And also, one or two cool things here. We get dual sim support with a dedicated Micro SD card slot and a headphone jack.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/27/2021
Source: XDA Developers

The Galaxy A12 is one of the cheapest smartphones currently sold by Samsung, so it’s probably not much of a surprise that the phone isn’t wildly fast. However, the phone is incredibly frustrating to use, even by the standard of other budget smartphones. When the keyboard is lagging during the initial setup process, you know you’re in for trouble. I would strongly recommend buying a Galaxy A32 5G instead if you can afford it, which normally costs $279.99 but frequently goes on sale for $205. Buying a used iPhone 8 or iPhone X is another solid option in this price range — battery life likely won’t be as good, but you could replace the battery later on, and even these old iPhones are substantially faster than the Galaxy A12. They should also have a few iOS updates left since iOS 15 still supports devices as old as the iPhone 6S.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/18/2021
Source: Android Police

Budget phones have their place, and for some, spending more than $200 on a mobile device is simply not worth it. The Galaxy A12 isn't a bad phone — in fact, it's an able road trip companion, with its giant display and a battery to match. The Galaxy A32 costs $100 more, and includes a better display and improved camera quality. There are also phones like the OnePlus Nord N200 5G, which has much better hardware for just $240. Ultimately, the Galaxy A12 fails to find a single category where it defeats the competition. It's a phone of compromises, but one that makes all the wrong choices when cutting corners. Extra-long battery life only takes you so far when using the phone is frustratingly slow. With superior devices available for just a bit of extra cash upfront, you're better off opting for something else.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/09/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Expert Reviews

Ultimately, it’s hard not to think of the Galaxy A12 as something of a misfire by Samsung. Yes, it has phenomenal battery life, and I sincerely hope that the company adopts the two-tone look onto other handsets, but even at £169 it still misses the mark. Much of that is down to the outstanding things other manufacturers are doing on a budget, but Samsung’s entry-level handsets have been able to hold their own in the past. It’s hard not to pin the disappointment entirely on the MediaTek Helios MT6765. Exynos and Qualcomm handsets never felt this sluggish. What should you buy instead? While all of the options highlighted in the ‘price and competition’ section would be preferable, my suggestion is the Poco X3 NFC if you can stretch to £199. If you can’t, then you should pay the same £169 for a Realme 7 or save £19 and buy a Nokia 5.3.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: 91mobiles

The Galaxy A12’s saving grace is its big battery and a set of cameras that perform well in the daylight. In most other aspects, it is mostly a hit-or-miss and that makes it falter against the competition. The budget segment has evolved quite a bit and I believe that Samsung’s more recent Galaxy M12 is a better answer to its rivals.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Manila Shaker

For a quick rundown, the Samsung Galaxy A12 gives an impressive camera and tough battery life for the price of P7,990 (4GB+128GB) and P9,990 (6GB+128GB). You may be nitpicking on some other phones in its price range but if you are not into heavy gaming or you are on a budget, or even an average user that wants the Samsung’s environment, software, AI, and optimization, Give the Galaxy A12 a try, and you might find it enjoyable.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/23/2021
Source: Manila Shaker

We tested the power of the latest entry-level device from Samsung-- the Samsung Galaxy A12. In our video, we also tested the battery life, benchmarks, charging, and the fps counter of each game including; Mobile Legends, League of Legends: Wildrift, PUBG Mobile, Call of Duty Mobile, Honkai Impact 3, and Genshin Impact. Watch our video to see the results.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/14/2021
Source: Manila Shaker

Samsung Galaxy A12 is one of Samsung's latest entry-level smartphones on their Galaxy A series. For the price of P7,990, is it enough?
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/13/2021
Source: Unbox

While the Samsung Galaxy A12 is far more affordable than the brand’s other offerings as we found out in this review, it’s going up against stiff competition against phones that are cheaper and faster. It does offer a decent vlogging experience for people who shoot vertical videos to be put up on TikTok, IG Stories, or FB.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/05/2021
Source: Gadgets Now

Samsung is probably not the name that pops in mind when one talks about the budget phone segment. But the company has been trying to carve out a name in this price range. Samsung Galaxy A12 seems to work in the same direction. Will the phone make a leap forward for the popular flagship maker? That only time can tell. But the device does make a point that the company has everything to become a popular choice in the budget phone category. With its decent camera abilities and good battery life, Galaxy A12 does make a case for Samsung.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: GSM Arena

Samsung often struggles to compete with the value-oriented brands in the lower market segments, and that's the case with the Galaxy A12 we have here. It's not a bad phone, and it excels in endurance, it takes decent pictures, and it looks good in the process. It's also a Samsung, and the brand itself could make it more appealing than its actual merits.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: PC Quest

The Samsung Galaxy A12 is the latest offering in the infamous “A” line-up of phones. Samsung has always tried to make their phones accessible to people of all walks of life and the “A” series that started off as a high mid-range segment has made its way to the mid-range and budget segment quite gracefully.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/19/2021
Source: Tech Nave

Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A12 is satisfactory as long as you use it casually. Its best selling point is none other than the battery, of course, which can last up to two days and the camera performance is satisfactory. However, it faces tough competition from other phones, which are cheaper yet deliver similar or superior specs.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/19/2021
Source: NLT

But the Samsung Galaxy A12 here offers a much better user experience – especially the software – in comparison with other phones in this category. And since the software is what we interact with whenever we touch the device, I’d argue that some people will definitely pay more to get a better experience.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/29/2021
Source: Phone World

After reading my review, you must thinking about purchasing this smartphone. Certainly, this smartphone deserves a chance. I’m pretty sure that Galaxy A12 will stun the market in terms of sale. I have used this phone and keenly observed all its features. Under this price range, the phone is worth buying.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/26/2021
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/29/2022
Rating: Total score: 81%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Canaltech

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/04/2021
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 65% features: 60% display: 65% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Tutto Android

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 62% mobility: 84% workmanship: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/12/2021
Source: Top for Phone

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/24/2021
Source: Top for Phone

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/18/2021
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: DGL.ru

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/15/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/13/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/18/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/26/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/20/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/13/2021
Source: Genk

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/09/2021
Source: Tinh Te

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/09/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/08/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/02/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/30/2020
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/30/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/28/2020
Source: Zing

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/25/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 12/25/2020
Source: Genk

Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 11/25/2020
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 66%
Source: Arena IT

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Specifications

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 450
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 506
Display: 6.50 inch, 19:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.196kg
Price: 165 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
The current entry-level model from Samsung's Galaxy A series is the A02s. For barely 165 Euros (~$197), the manufacturer includes a triple camera system and a quite large battery. However, there are a lot of competitors, including other inhouse models, and there are also some really basic problems.
Foreign Reviews
Source: CNet

I'd recommend the Galaxy A03S to anyone who wants to spend less than $200 on a new Samsung phone. Since it's the newest of the three phones, it'll get more years of software and security updates. I also found that it offered respectable performance for the price. While the A12 does take better photos, I didn't think the step up in quality was worth the extra $20. Instead, buy the A03S and invest that $20 toward the microSD card you'll need. If you wanted to check out other sub-$200 phones that aren't made by Samsung, Motorola has the $160 Moto G Pure phone and a $200 Moto G Power phone. The OnePlus Nord N200 5G goes slightly above the $200 threshold at $240, but it offers 5G connectivity.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 04/17/2022
Source: Android Authority

The Galaxy A02s is a good smartphone if you only need the basics and you’re working with a tight budget. It’s hands-down the most affordable way to get your hands on Samsung’s One UI 3.1, but the processor can’t always keep up and the cameras won’t be your go-to for many family photos. That said, if you want a cheap way to watch your favorite shows and use your wired headphones, the Galaxy A02s is happy to oblige. If you’re willing to expand your budget a bit, there are plenty of Galaxy A02s rivals to consider for under $200. Samsung’s own Galaxy A12 ($179) might be one of the best, with a significantly better camera and a side-mounted fingerprint reader for not much more money. There’s also the Motorola Moto G Play ($169) that ditches the third camera but offers near-stock Android and a rear-mounted fingerprint scanner. Finally, the Nokia G10 ($149) offers splash protection, a slightly bigger battery, and a better base configuration.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Android Police

The Galaxy A02s isn't competing with flagships or even mid-range devices. It's slow enough that some basic software features are just about unusable without a great deal of patience. But everything works, it's $110, and you can depend on Samsung to value your security and keep the phone safe to use for the next four years. It may be slow, but it's reliable. In all, I'm pretty stunned at what you can get today for such a low price. Admittedly, for just $60 more, you can get the $170 Moto G Play, which I also like. The Moto is much, much faster — the new Snapdragon 460 positively flies compared to the somewhat decrepit Snapdragon 450 in the A02s. Plus, the Moto has a fingerprint sensor, among other benefits. The A02s is, by all hardware metrics, a worse smartphone, but Moto's software commitment for most of its phones is basically a joke in 2021; it abandons them so quickly.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/20/2021
Source: Tech Nave

In Malaysia, most consumers want to get the best out of the products that they have purchased. This is true even for tech gadget enthusiasts, especially with the current global situation. Digital devices are so important now, as they help us stay connected. But what if someone just wants something affordable, reliable, and easy to use? This is where the Samsung Galaxy A02 and Galaxy A02s come in with the special Digi Prihatin 35 Prepaid Bundle subscription, which offers a rebate of RM300 where subscribers can bring home the latter at only RM95, whereas the former can be theirs absolutely free of charge. If that sounds like something you'd be interested in, read on below to find out more about the features of the two phones and the Digi plan.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/15/2021
Source: Expert Reviews

The Samsung Galaxy A02s feels like a return to the bad old days when cheap handsets sold based on name recognition, even if the internals bore little resemblance to the brand’s trusted products. This may be a Galaxy in name and looks, but the four-year old processor makes it a pretty poor choice in 2021 – especially when the Motorola Moto G10 is £10 cheaper and is the same or better on every metric.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 40%
Source: GSM Arena

Ultimately, if you're on a tight budget and looking to get the most out of it, perhaps brand loyalty shouldn't be on top of your priorities list, and you should look at competing offers from classic value-oriented makers. If you insist on a Galaxy, certain concessions are inevitable.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/07/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Pokde

The Samsung Galaxy A02s is a good entry-level smartphone that I would recommend for people who don’t need much from their device, or they simply need a secondary one. At RM529, the Malaysian retail version will only have the 4GB RAM 64GB storage configuration, which will end up performing at least slightly better than our review unit.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 60% performance: 40% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phone World

Samsung with the launch of its latest budget smartphone, the Samsung Galaxy A02s, is hoping to grab the market share once again. The Galaxy A02 comes with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 along with the Adreno 506. In Pakistan, Samsung introduced the 4GB RAM variant along with 64GBs of internal storage only. The physical dimension of the phone is 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 and weighs 196g.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/01/2021
Source: NLT

We just reviewed the Galaxy S21 Ultra, but now, we’re taking a look at the company’s entry-level smartphone. The Samsung Galaxy A02s has a pretty nice name too – like an anime mecha bot. That aside, here’s our review of the entry-level smartphone, Galaxy A02s. It’s not really that entry-level actually.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/31/2021
Source: Canaltech

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/09/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/02/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/10/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/31/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/28/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 12/25/2020
Source: Genk

Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 11/25/2020
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/19/2021
Rating: Total score: 56%
Samsung Galaxy A02
Specifications

Processor: Mediatek MT6739WW
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8100
Display: 6.50 inch, 22:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.206kg
Price: 120 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tech Nave

In Malaysia, most consumers want to get the best out of the products that they have purchased. This is true even for tech gadget enthusiasts, especially with the current global situation. Digital devices are so important now, as they help us stay connected. But what if someone just wants something affordable, reliable, and easy to use? This is where the Samsung Galaxy A02 and Galaxy A02s come in with the special Digi Prihatin 35 Prepaid Bundle subscription, which offers a rebate of RM300 where subscribers can bring home the latter at only RM95, whereas the former can be theirs absolutely free of charge. If that sounds like something you'd be interested in, read on below to find out more about the features of the two phones and the Digi plan.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/15/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/07/2021
Source: Genk

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/07/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/05/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/02/2021
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/20/2021
Source: Genk

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/19/2021
Source: Genk

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/28/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Specifications

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 750G 5G
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 619
Display: 6.50 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.189kg
Price: 429 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
The Galaxy A52 5G is an updated version of one of the most successful Samsung smartphones. It comes with a price hike, which puts it above the 400-Euro (~$480) mark for the first time. Read our review to learn why it is still worth every cent.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a solid mid-ranger with a few predictable shortcomings. It competes well in a market that’s saturated with alternatives and could be a winner for Samsung.On the whole, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a scrappy mid-ranger that offers a lot of value — far more than its predecessor. No $500 phone is without compromises, but none of the A52 5G’s shortcomings feel like total deal-breakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/14/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Expert Reviews

This, among other things, is one of the reasons why the A52 5G might actually be a more well-informed pick. The Pixel 4a, as much as it’s an astonishing mid-range handset in a bunch of areas, isn’t quite as versatile in the camera department. Don’t forget that it also has a smaller (60Hz) screen, no expandable storage and a slightly weaker processor, too. If you’re weighing up your options in the mid-range space, then the Galaxy A52 5G has absolutely scaled the ranks, disrupting the recent tradition of “Pixel is best”. As long as you can afford the extra £50, then you really can’t go wrong with picking up a Galaxy A52 5G instead.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Expert Reviews

This, among other things, is one of the reasons why the A52 5G might actually be a more well-informed pick. The Pixel 4a, as much as it’s an astonishing mid-range handset in a bunch of areas, isn’t quite as versatile in the camera department. Don’t forget that it also has a smaller (60Hz) screen, no expandable storage and a slightly weaker processor, too. If you’re weighing up your options in the mid-range space, then the Galaxy A52 5G has absolutely scaled the ranks, disrupting the recent tradition of “Pixel is best”. As long as you can afford the extra £50, then you really can’t go wrong with picking up a Galaxy A52 5G instead.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/04/2021
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Tom's Guide

There are also some things I really like about the Galaxy A52 5G, including its playful design, the 120Hz refresh rate and its versatile main 64MP camera. And the performance and battery life are very solid for the price. However, a couple of things frustrated me about this phone, including the easily scratched display. And while Samsung offers more cameras than the Pixel 4a 5G, Google’s phone tends to take better pics overall. While we've not put it head to head with the Pixel 5a yet, we'd imagine this statement holds true there too. The Google Pixel 4a 5G remains the better choice for the money, assuming you want 5G in your Android handset. Stepping down to the Nord N10 5G is probably only worth it if you're on a very tight budget. If you're very interested in the A52 5G's high refresh rate or its main camera, though, those are good enough reasons to go for this over the more well-rounded competition.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: DxOMark

The only true downside of the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is its lengthy charging time, particularly when compared to its rivals, and that is largely attributable to the Samsung’s 15W in-box charger (vs. 33W for the Xiaomi and 65W for the Oppo). With a compatible 25W charger, the charging experience would likely improve significantly. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G provides more than two days of autonomy, and put in an especially good performance in our on the go tests.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/25/2021
Source: GSM Arena

Unfortunately, the Galaxy A52 5G is just priced unfavorably. There are many better or faster 5G phones at a similar or even cheaper price out there and while the promises of very long software support may be boosting the A52 5G's value proposition it still feels your are not getting the best bang for your buck. Not least because the regular A52 with the same kind of support and largely the same feature set is that much cheaper. Samsung can make the Galaxy A52 5G an attractive offer by applying a price cut as it has done in some markets. In most places, however, you are better off spending your money elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Make Use Of

For the most part, Samsung pulled the right strings in making the A52 an excellent midrange device; the screen is large, vibrant, and snappy, the battery life is just plain incredible, and the camera delivers sufficient quality that rounds out this phone's experience. The main competitor of this phone isn't from another brand, but from Samsung itself. The Galaxy A52 exists in a space where you can still pick up the S20 FE, and if the rumors are true, Samsung is set to release the Galaxy S21 FE later this summer, and the price difference between the S20 FE and the A52 is marginally thin, especially if you consider the promotions Samsung and its carriers run all year-round.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: CNet

As with any phone, even a good one, not everything is roses and sunshine. The in-screen fingerprint reader is so annoying to use that I preferred to enter my PIN to unlock the phone. The mediocre macro camera seems like a frivolous add-on that is only there to boost the total number of cameras on the phone. More is definitely not better. There are many duplicate apps like Samsung's version of an internet browser and photo gallery app in addition to the ones from Google. But after two months, when I step back and consider everything, the Galaxy A52 5G is an all-around good phone with some great features and a few minor and annoying flaws. It's a solid buy for $500, but as I write this review, you can get a Galaxy A52 5G unlocked on Samsung's website for $425, which makes it even harder to pass up.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: PC Mag

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G ($499.99) has big shoes to fill: Samsung customers are expecting a lot of value from the successor to the Galaxy A51, one of the top-selling phones of 2020. For the most part, the Galaxy A52 5G delivers, with a gorgeous 120Hz AMOLED display, 5G connectivity, an ambitious camera array, and solid battery life. What’s missing, however, is performance. The A52 5G is a bit sluggish when compared with the Google Pixel 4a 5G ($499) or even the Moto G Stylus 5G ($399.99).
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: DxOMark

The A52 5G could be brighter in most tested conditions, which is true in the video use case as well. The device does not read 60 fps UHD content, which is inconvenient for some, and its ghost touches are something gamers will notice right away. But despite a few quirks, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G delivers good quality and performance for the price. Its colors are accurate, especially in outdoor conditions, and it retains good details without degrading content, especially in direct sunlight. Web browsing feels smooth.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/29/2021
Source: DxOMark

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G punched above its weight class in terms of the quality of the sound it produces in playback, and did reasonably well as a recording device too. With an exceptional artifacts score, good timbre performance, and strong spatial performance, the device provides good value in playback. As a recording device, it performed well in terms of overall timbre score, but has some shortcomings, including mono recording in the memo app and not capturing sufficient loudness in life videos.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/09/2021
Source: XDA Developers

I didn’t find much to complain about with the Galaxy A52 5G. The build quality could be better, and I would have preferred a telephoto lens over the nearly-useless 5MP macro. Samsung’s software also remains as polarizing as ever — while some (like me) generally prefer One UI over stock Android, it’s definitely not a perfect experience. The abundance of features can feel overwhelming, and the advertisements in system applications like Samsung Pay and Weather are still inexcusable. Overall, the Galaxy A52 5G is one of the strongest budget phones we’ve seen yet out of Samsung, especially in the United States. It’s a great package for the typical price of $500, and if you can get it on sale, that’s even better.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/02/2021
Source: DxOMark

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a high-end smartphone that sits just behind the A72 5G in the South Korean manufacturer’s more affordable A-series lineup. It features an FHD+ 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display and a 4500 mAh battery with 25W super-fast charging. The Android OS is powered by an octa-core processor with 6GB RAM, and there’s 128 GB of internal storage that’s expandable to 1 TB via Micro SD. The handset is also IP67 rated for water and dust resistance. For photography, the device features a quad rear camera including a 64 MP primary module and a 12 MP ultra-wide. A 5 MP macro and 5 MP depth sensor for bokeh simulation complete the shooting options. Let’s see how the device performs in our DXOMARK Camera tests.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/01/2021
Source: Techradar

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G isn’t going to blow you away with top-end specs or a remarkably affordable price, but it’s still a solid choice for a mid-range handset that can compete with the likes of the Google Pixel 4a. It’s a difficult phone to love, but if you’re looking for a lot for a lower price point than most other Samsung devices, you may enjoy what the Galaxy A52 5G has to offer.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/28/2021
Source: Best Products

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is the best smartphone $500 can buy today. It offers top-tier features and a great user experience at an agreeable price point. I also tip my hat to Samsung for committing to provide 4 years’ worth of timely security updates for the A52. It's rare to see this level of support available for Android's cheaper phones. For comparison, a $500 budget will get you an entry-level iPhone XR with less storage (64GB), one rear-facing camera, and no 5G. The Google Pixel 4a 5G also costs the same, but it’s nowhere near as feature-packed. It isn’t waterproof, either. At this price point, the Galaxy A52 5G is the one to beat.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/22/2021
Source: Tom's Guide

There are also some things I really like about the Galaxy A52 5G, including its playful design, the 120Hz refresh rate and its versatile main 64MP camera. And the performance and battery life are very solid for the price. However, a couple of things frustrated me about this phone, including the easily scratched display. And while Samsung offers more cameras than the Pixel 4a 5G, Google’s phone tends to take better pics overall. The Google Pixel 4a 5G remains the better choice for the money, assuming you want 5G in your Android handset. Stepping down to the Nord N10 5G is probably only worth it if you're on a very tight budget. If you're very interested in the A52 5G's high refresh rate or its main camera, though, those are good enough reasons to go for this over the more well-rounded competition.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G gets more right than it gets wrong. It offers solid build quality, a pleasing display, excellent battery life, and a capable main camera. It's not the most performant mid-ranger out there and the secondary cameras underwhelm, but if you're in the market for a $500 phone with 5G, the Galaxy A52 5G is up there with the best.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Engadget

Samsung's Galaxy A52 5G really shows how far mid-range Android phones have come. It has a great screen, decent, cameras, all-day battery life, and pretty snappy performance. The problem is that at $500, it has a lot of competition, including from Samsung itself. The S20 FE can be found new for $599, or with a discount or trade-in for as low as $399, and it has a better screen, processor, and camera setup. Add in some great phones from OnePlus in a similar range, and even the iPhone 11 for around the same price, and while the A52 5G is good, that might not be enough.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/30/2021
Source: Tech Advisor

The Galaxy A52 5G sweats on the details, with a fine 120Hz AMOLED display, an IP67-rated body, a competent OIS-laden camera and the promise of four years of security updates. There’s better value to be had, however, if not quite the same sense of security.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Central

Samsung continues to offer up a compelling mid-range phone with a near-flagship experience in the Galaxy A52 5G. With a large 120Hz screen, 4500mAh battery that will last all day even with heavy use, it's the 5G phone under $500 to beat.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: The Verge

What I didn’t love — the cluttered software, fussy fingerprint sensor, a tendency toward oversaturated color in photos — feels more forgivable when the phone gets the nonnegotiable stuff right. The Pixel 4A 5G is probably this device’s closest competition, and it beats the A52 5G on camera quality and a cleaner UI, but it’s a smaller device without a fancy fast refresh rate screen. Depending on how you feel about either of those things, the 4A 5G might be the better pick for you.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: TechTablets

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Review. An in-depth review covers, the design, battery life, benchmarks, camera samples, charge time, gaming performance, and thermals. ESR 20% discount code: MX3JL5JD
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/22/2021
Source: Hardware Zone

With so much to offer at under $550, phones like the Galaxy A52 and its competitors might start to eat into the appeal that flagship phones once held a strong grip. Is this the end of ultra-expensive phones? Or is this just the beginning as top-end phone models start to explore the realms of multi-displays, foldable display, rollable display and other such leading-edge experiences? We tend to think there’s a push for the latter as more brands are debuting showcase devices that we may one day pine for. Till then, the mainstream audience stands to benefit from the continual process and technological improvements to bring devices like the Samsung Galaxy A52 at ever more palatable price points.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% performance: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: T3

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is an Android handset with an excellent main camera, it has a large display with a 120Hz refresh rate, water-resistance and a long-lasting 4,500mAh battery. Granted its performance won’t blow you away but you get what you pay for there.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/14/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide

There are also some things I really like about the Galaxy A52 5G, including its playful design, the 120Hz refresh rate and its versatile main 64MP camera. And the performance and battery life are pretty solid for the price. However, a couple of things frustrated me about this phone, including the easily scratched display. And while Samsung offers more cameras than the Pixel 4a 5G, Google’s phone tends to take better pics overall. The Google Pixel 4a 5G remains the better choice for the money, assuming you want 5G in your Android handset. Stepping down to the Nord N10 5G is probably only worth it if you're on a very tight budget. If you're very interested in the A52 5G's high refresh rate or its main camera, though, those are good enough reasons to go for this over the more well-rounded competition.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/11/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews

It’s worth noting right off the bat that while the A52 and A52 5G are similar in name and design. There’s more than just 5G that separates them. The one I have had in my pocket for the last week is the 5G model and all of my views relate to it alone. Keep that in mind when you’re looking for deals in the future.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Expert Reviews

This, among other things, is one of the reasons why the A52 5G might actually be a more well-informed pick. The Pixel 4a, as much as it’s an astonishing mid-range handset in a bunch of areas, isn’t quite as versatile in the camera department. Don’t forget that it also has a smaller (60Hz) screen, no expandable storage and a slightly weaker processor, too. If you’re weighing up your options in the mid-range space, then the Galaxy A52 5G has absolutely scaled the ranks, disrupting the recent tradition of “Pixel is best”. As long as you can afford the extra £50, then you really can’t go wrong with picking up a Galaxy A52 5G instead.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Phone Arena

The Samsung Galaxy A52 is here in a slew of different colors and bringing a handful of upgrades to a line that desperately needed them to stay competitive. It’s a €350 midranger with a pretty OK camera, a beautiful, 90 Hz AMOLED screen, and performance that… you know — will do the job.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: XDA Developers

Prices for major markets like the US and India have not been announced yet, but the Galaxy A52 5G is selling for around the equivalent of $510 in Europe, the UK, and Hong Kong. At this price, the phone should be a top contender for one of the best mid-tier phones — in North America and South Korea. Samsung has one of the widest retail networks for an Android smartphone brand, and in a fair few places, the Galaxy A52 might be the only viable option that consumers will be able to buy. In markets like Asia, the Galaxy A52 5G will have a lot of competition, though Samsung’s combination of proven quality, brand reputation, and marketing prowess should make this another top seller.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/18/2021
Source: Pocket Lint

An excellent mid-range phone, packed with a great display, plenty of power, and waterproofing to help it stand out from the crowd. Running Samsung's latest software, it's an affordable way to get the latest Samsung experience with little major compromise.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Trusted Reviews

The A52 5G certainly comes with plenty packed in, and if you’re after that Samsung name – and the look that comes with it – then, following a few day's use, this appears to be a good pick.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Techradar

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G brings a variety of top-end features you'd normally expect to be included on flagship phones to its cheaper variant including 5G connectivity and an improved screen technology. This may be one to watch if you're after a cheaper Samsung phone.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Yugatech

Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Phone Arena

The Galaxy A52 5G will be one of Samsung's 2021 mid-range offerings, along with its larger variant – the Galaxy A72 5G. Over its predecessor from last year, the Galaxy A52 5G will have a smoother 90Hz display, which will also feature great contrast and colors thanks to its AMOLED technology. In addition, A52 5G owners will enjoy the phone's modern design with minimal bezels, curved edges, and versatile quad-camera setup.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/18/2021
Source: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 72% features: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Area DVD

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/11/2021
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/21/2021
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 72% features: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: PCtipp.ch

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Stage

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computerbase

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/02/2021
Source: n-tv

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/01/2021
Source: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/19/2021
Source: Tuexperto

Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/01/2021
Source: Xataka

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 83% display: 90% mobility: 88% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tuexperto

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/30/2021
Source: Xataka

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: PC Guia

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 80%
Source: 4G News

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 55% performance: 60% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 62% features: 77%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 75% features: 85% display: 90% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Tutto Android

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 82% mobility: 84% workmanship: 75%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 82% display: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 86%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/19/2021
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 80% display: 89% mobility: 90% workmanship: 86%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Bright.nl

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/14/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: 01Net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/21/2021
Source: CNet France

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Geeks and Com

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 75% display: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 90%
Source: Nextpit France

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Journal du Geek

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Fredzone

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/18/2021
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/09/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/31/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Komputerswiat

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/21/2021
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Komputerswiat

Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 12/01/2021
Source: Android.com.pl

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tabletowo

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/17/2021
Source: DGL.ru

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/29/2021
Source: Hi-Tech Mail

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Smartmania.cz

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 88% features: 85% mobility: 89% workmanship: 87%
Source: Zing

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/08/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/30/2021
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/30/2021
Source: Tek.no

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Komputer for alle

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/21/2022
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Lyd og Billede

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/04/2021
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/19/2021
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Arena IT

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/24/2021
Source: Computerblog.ro

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/16/2021
Source: Puhelinvertailu

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/12/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Samsung Galaxy A72 5G
Specifications

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 750G 5G
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 619
Display: 6.70 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.203kg
Price: 600 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Phone Arena

Last year, the midrange Galaxy A71 was a success and became quite popular. Now, its successor is here, bringing, at least at first look, significant improvements in the display with a 90Hz high refresh rate, a bigger 5,000mAh battery, and a versatile camera system. All of these cool features are packed under a gorgeous new look both the A72 and the A52 sport, with fresh and youthful colors. Here’s our hands-on experience with the new midranger. We noticed a smaller improvement in the processor and its performance is not a giant step forward from the Galaxy A71, but despite that, the A72 is a good investment for anyone wanting a smooth Samsung phone for an affordable price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Phone Arena

Last year, the budget-friendly Galaxy A71 was a success and became quite popular. We are now expecting its successor, the Galaxy A72, to soon hit the market scene, offering, just like its predecessor, a good balance between quality and price. The phone is expected to come in two variants, connectivity-wise: a 5G version and an LTE-only version. Here, we will focus on the 5G variant of the phone.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/17/2021
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 75% display: 88% mobility: 87% workmanship: 85%
Samsung Galaxy A72
Specifications

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 720G
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 618
Display: 6.70 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.203kg
Price: 449 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Samsung has relaunched its mid-range top model: The Galaxy A72 is even better than the already strong predecessor and has, among other things, the larger battery and better cameras. As the review shows, the Galaxy A72 should also be the standard against which all mid-range rivals have to measure themselves this year.
Foreign Reviews
Source: DxOMark

Although it overall behind the Oppo Reno6 5G and the Xiaomi 11T, which both offer a better charging experience, the Samsung Galaxy A72 battery has the best autonomy in its segment.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/09/2021
Source: DxOMark

Announced in March 2021, the Snapdragon 720G-powered Samsung Galaxy A72 looks like an enticing option in the High-end ($400-599) segment, offering a comprehensive camera setup with a Quad-Bayer sensor in the primary module as well as a 3x tele, a 12 MP ultra-wide, and a dedicated macro camera. Let’s see how it fares in the DXOMARK Camera test protocol.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/03/2021
Source: NDTV Gadgets

As it turns out, the Samsung Galaxy A72 is not too different from the Galaxy A52, and that's a problem. The telephoto camera is a nice addition but I didn't find it very useful since its image quality was average at best. Other than this, you're paying a premium over the Galaxy A52 for a slightly larger battery and the bundled 25W charger. It's hard to justify spending at least Rs. 34,999 for the Galaxy A72 when you can get nearly the same performance and features with the Galaxy A52 at Rs. 26,499, and some phones priced under Rs. 30,000 offer even better specifications and capabilities. If the Samsung name and features such as the IP rating and stereo speakers are what drew you towards the Galaxy A72, I'd suggest buying the Galaxy A52 instead and saving some money. If you absolutely want to spend more, then any of the above competitors would be a better buy.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech PP

We think Samsung has shown some major guts in launching the Galaxy A72 with a starting price of Rs. 34,999. The phone not only comes with an older processor but also does not really bring anything too unique to the table. Yes, we love the design; the cameras and display are very good, and the battery life is impressive, but there is a lot of competition lurking around at that price point. There is the Mi 11X which comes with a Snapdragon 870 at around Rs 30,000, as does the iQOO 7. And well, there will be those who might think of the OnePlus 9R, the Vivo X60, which cost a little more but come with better processors and equally formidable specs. And well, all of those worthies also bring 5G to the table, which is a welcome bonus.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 60% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: The Indian Express

The Galaxy A72 is aimed at those who have a budget of higher than Rs 35,000, and want a phone with a good camera. The phone is also more affordable compared to other mid-range flagships such as vivo X60 (Rs 39,990), OnePlus 9R (Rs 39,999). However, the recently launched Mi 11X costs Rs 29,999 and undercuts the A72 in pricing.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/14/2021
Source: GSM Arena

So bottom line then - just like the Galaxy A52, the A72 is a truly unique package, even on the current over-saturated mid-ranger scene. That being said, its value relies on a very particular mix of features. If it just happens to be something that resonates with you, there really is no reason to look elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Yugatech

Now that we’ve talked about almost everything, let’s finally focus on price. The Samsung Galaxy A72 is officially available for PHP 23,990. And as I’ve mentioned, it’s quite in a risky spot because first, it only got minimal improvements from its predecessor the A71, then there’s the competition in its price range with other phones offering better performance and cameras. It does however give the advantage of being a familiar Samsung device with an attractive design and large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/18/2021
Source: Android Central

The Galaxy A72 nails the basics: you get a sublime 90Hz AMOLED display, minimal design with pastel hues, robust hardware, reliable cameras at the back, a 5000mAh battery, and long-term software updates. But the fact that there's no 5G here makes it a non-starter in global markets, and you also have to contend with a lot of bloatware.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Unbox

Our review of the Galaxy A72 for the Philippines shows that the phablet is the most value-packed Samsung mid-range phone to date. Additions like a bigger battery, telephoto camera, high refresh rate, and an IP rating made the Galaxy A72 a compelling offering—and arguably one of Samsung’s best mid-range phones in recent memory.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Source: The Mobile Indian

In our opinion, the Galaxy A52 is a much better pick than the Galaxy A72 as both of them have almost everything in common except a camera sensor, and display & battery size. The Galaxy A72 is also a decent phone but at that price, you have better options and even the differences between the two are not worth spending Rs 8500 more on the Galaxy A72.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Source: Lowyat.net

The Samsung Galaxy A72 is a cheery phone, or at least that’s the picture the company wants to paint for it. While the names of its colours can rub people the wrong way (it certainly did for me), it’s difficult to counter the point that the phone is a fine mid-range device, at least by today’s standards. The unique back is a minor plus point, but the IP67 rating is, in my opinion, the bigger and better deal.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/02/2021
Source: Manila Shaker

Absolutely – but the price is obviously at a premium here since you’re getting the best experience available on a mid-range smartphone. At RM1,899 – I think it’s a little steep and inching close to the Galaxy S20 FE 4G’s current price of RM2,099.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/31/2021
Source: KL Gadget Guy

I can’t deny that there’s a bunch of important upgrades and the Galaxy A72 does have a lot to offer, but you may look the other way if you’re aiming for a 5G phone. Apart from that, the phone looks great, performs well and has a long-lasting battery life. It’s a decent phone if you don’t mind the lacking performance in lowlight photography and the absence of 5G support.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/31/2021
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 70% performance: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: Phone Arena

Last year, the midrange Galaxy A71 was a success and became quite popular. Now, its successor is here, bringing significant improvements to the table, with a smooth 90Hz high refresh rate, a bigger 5,000mAh battery, and a versatile camera system. All of these cool features are packed under a gorgeous new look the Galaxy A72 sports, with fresh and youthful colors. There is a smaller improvement in the processor capabilities and its performance is not a giant step forward from the Galaxy A71, but despite that, the A72 is a good investment for anyone wanting a smooth Samsung phone, with great battery life and a capable camera for the affordable price of $430.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Sam Mobile

The Galaxy A72, like the Galaxy A52, is a mid-range phone that offers a high-end experience. You get an excellent display with 90Hz refresh rate that makes for smooth scrolling and animations, water and dust resistance, stereo speakers, a zoom camera capable of up to 30x magnification, the latest software out of the box along with a guarantee of three major OS upgrades, and mostly excellent performance with the Snapdragon 720G processor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2021
Source: Engadget

Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 03/19/2021
Source: Area DVD

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/07/2021
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Curved

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/02/2021
Source: Tech Stage

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Chinahandys.net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Nextpit Germany

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/12/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Futurezone.at

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2021
Source: Teltarif

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 92% performance: 50% display: 880% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: A1 Blog

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/25/2021
Source: Zona Movilidad

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/07/2021
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 83% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 100% workmanship: 70%
Source: Xataka

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 70% display: 88% mobility: 93% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tuexperto

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/13/2021
Source: Canaltech

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/19/2021
Source: Android Geek

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/07/2021
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 70% features: 75% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% features: 77%
Source: Tutto Android

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/27/2021
Source: Techzine

Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 06/12/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/12/2021
Source: Computer Totaal

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/12/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Les Mobiles

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Nextpit France

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/26/2021
Source: Tabletowo

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Antyweb

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/16/2021
Source: Chip Online TR

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Log.com.tr

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/27/2021
Source: Zing

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/27/2021
Source: Danviet

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/19/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/04/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2021
Source: Zing

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2021
Source: Zing

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/24/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/19/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/19/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Jagat Review

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/31/2021
Source: Tek.no

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/18/2021
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Arena IT

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/01/2021
Source: Computerblog.ro

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/05/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52
Specifications

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 720G
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 618
Display: 6.50 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.189kg
Price: 409 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Those who can live without 5G will be able to get the Samsung Galaxy A52 for about 70 Euros (~$85) less, depending on the configuration. While there is still an older SoC, the option to choose between two storage configurations continues to be available. Our test evaluates the capabilities of the more powerful of the two.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Manila Shaker

For us, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is a good all-rounder smartphone. It has a decent quality on its camera and it just needs optimization. It also has average gaming performance even though the chipset isn’t capable of connecting to 5G. But the best offering is the display and the aesthetic and pleasing look which is great for entertainment use. 100 Days Review: We haven’t encountered any issues for around 3 months of use, and the device is stable and working fine as a daily driver. I won’t recommend the device if you are aiming for a mid-range gaming-focused smartphone, but if you are looking for a long-term device with the promise of android support for more than a couple of years, this will be a great option. Samsung Galaxy A52 is priced at P18,990 for the same 8GB + 128GB configuration. For the price, it really offers value with a couple of drawbacks but with strong upsides. The increments compared to its predecessor is very notable and worthy.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/21/2021
Source: Android Police

The A52 is $100 more expensive than the A51 was at launch. For that hundred bucks, you're getting an overhauled design, a better processor, more RAM, faster display, and IP67 water resistance (the A51 didn't have any official rating). That's a lot of improvement. In the grand A-series tradition, the A52 is another competent mid-range Samsung phone in a long line of competent mid-range Samsung phones. But I would've liked to see some tweaks to either hit a lower price or allocate more budget to the A52's weaker points — dropping the two useless camera modules and swapping out the 120Hz panel for a 90Hz one, for instance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Manila Shaker

I have been using the Samsung Galaxy A52 for almost 4 months now, And in this video, I will share my experience, what I love and issues that I have encountered ever since I started using this device as my daily driver.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/09/2021
Source: MrMobile

This is the Galaxy A52, Samsung’s top of the line mid-ranger, which on my book is maybe the best update the company has brought to the series. See, price and features are all nice things to have, but if you can add a bit of style to the package, I think the premise can go farther. I’m Jaime Rivera with Pocketnow and let’s dive into our full review
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/05/2021
Source: Gadgetspeak

This is the latest Samsung offering to cross my desk, my unit has a matt sky blue back, a shiny slightly darker blue sides and a very shiny front. There are a vertical line of three cameras top left of the back and a forth camera and LED flash beside these.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 80% performance: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Ricks Tech

Support, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/01/2021
Source: Android Police

The A52 is $100 more expensive than the A51 was at launch. For that hundred bucks, you're getting an overhauled design, a better processor, more RAM, faster display, and IP67 water resistance (the A51 didn't have any official rating). That's a lot of improvement. In the grand A-series tradition, the A52 is another competent mid-range Samsung phone in a long line of competent mid-range Samsung phones. But I would've liked to see some tweaks to either hit a lower price or allocate more budget to the A52's weaker points — dropping the two useless camera modules and swapping out the 120Hz panel for a 90Hz one, for instance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Tech PP

All of which makes it appear as if the Galaxy A52 will have a tough time repeating the bestselling achievements of its predecessor. It is a very good option for those who want a phone that looks different and performs well but starts fading the moment the spec sheet comparisons come into play. The Galaxy A52 ticks a lot of boxes but does not really top the class in any significant department.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/16/2021
Source: Phandroid

At the end of the day, I’m pretty impressed by what the Galaxy A52 has to offer. Sure there are quite a few smartphones from Chinese brands that deliver better specs at the same price, but if you’re in the US, the only real option that might be better at $500 is the Pixel 4a 5G. There’s a noticeable gap in performance and camera quality between this phone and the Galaxy S21, but the $300 price difference definitely makes up for it, especially when you consider the improvements the A52 offers over last year’s model.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/07/2021
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Manila Shaker

And finally – the price. At RM1,499, I think that the Galaxy A52 is rather pricy, yes – so maybe wait until there’s a free gift bundle promotion. Truthfully speaking, both the Galaxy A52 and Galaxy A72 are pretty much the most balanced smartphones – in all aspects – at their own price range.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/30/2021
Source: Think Digit

The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a decent smartphone for its asking price but leaves a lot to be desired especially since you’re spending upwards of Rs 25,000. It does give users a viable alternative in the face of OnePlus Nord and the likes but does little to stand out in the crowd. It looks good in the hand and the matte finish on the back steers it clear of fingerprints and smudges. However, the biggest gripe is the fact that while the A52 supports 25W fast charging, Samsung wants users to pay for an additional adapter.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 65% price: 66% performance: 58% workmanship: 65%
Source: Yugatech

The Galaxy A52 is an interesting device given that it has two versions in the Philippine market. The one that we have is the 4G version that is priced at PHP 18,990, while the other is the 5G version with a more powerful chipset, higher refresh rate, and 5G connectivity for a more expensive PHP 23,990. Is it a good upgrade to the Galaxy A51? Yes, it is. Should you get one? If you’re okay not having the bells and whistles of the Galaxy A52 5G, and have a lower budget, then we think it’s a good buy. But if you really need 5G and a better performing chipset at this budget, we think you’re better off looking for a better option.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/15/2021
Source: Gadgets Now

With the Galaxy A52, Samsung is not trying to do something entirely different apart from revisiting the spec-sheets that have worked for the company. This is a reliable daily driver and the promise of software update for three years makes the deal sweeter. Having said that the price is a bit high when compared to other brands offering similar features in phones under Rs 20,000. But then as said above, this is where Samsung’s brand value and build quality comes in.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/11/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: 91mobiles

In sum, the Galaxy A52 is a good device overall, but one that could have been better. That statement can actually be applied to anything and everything, but Samsung could have done well to include a faster processor, and some basic essentials like a 25W charger (since the phone supports it), and a case in the box. The 5G version of the Galaxy A52, which hasn’t been launched in India yet, does come with a 5G-capable Snapdragon 750G SoC and a 120Hz display, which are specs that sound much better on paper as compared to what the 4G version of the Galaxy A52 offers. When it comes to rivals, the Galaxy A52 goes up against the likes of the OnePlus Nord (review), the Xiaomi Mi 10T, the Mi 10i (review), and others in its price segment. Each of these devices has its own set of pluses and minuses, and in most cases, offers better performance than the Samsung Galaxy A52. On the other hand, the Galaxy A52 does feature IP67 waterproofing, which could appeal to a fair chunk of prospective buyers.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Business Standard

Priced Rs 26,499 onwards, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is an all-round midrange smartphone with something in store for everyone. It boasts a good sAMOLED display of 90Hz refresh rate, loud and clear stereo speakers, 3.5mm audio out port for wired earphones, a capable camera system, and sleek performance. Except for the IP67 protection and camera system with OIS, there is nothing new that the Galaxy A52 brings to the table when compared with other smartphones in the midrange segment. Therefore, it might not be the best midrange smartphone but the best in Samsung's line-up.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/07/2021
Source: Unbox

The Galaxy A52 has so many quality of life changes from its predecessor and checks many of the boxes that we’ve wanted to see from Samsung mid-rangers. You still have their beautiful display that has been improved with a higher refresh rate plus the addition of stereo speakers just ups the enjoyment with this device.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2021
Source: NDTV Gadgets

The Galaxy A52 is a good-looking smartphone and brings IP67 water and dust resistance rating to the table, which most of its competition miss out on. Sadly, apart from this, not a lot of things are in its favour. It does certain things well but the competition does them better. The Galaxy A52 does not offer the best performance and doesn't have the best cameras. However, it will appeal to the design-conscious, and if you are a bit clumsy, the water resistance is a big plus.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: The Mobile Indian

In our opinion, the Galaxy A52 is a much better pick than the Galaxy A72 as both of them have almost everything in common except a camera sensor, and display & battery size. The Galaxy A72 is also a decent phone but at that price, you have better options and even the differences between the two are not worth spending Rs 8500 more on the Galaxy A72.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Source: The Times of India

Overall, the Galaxy A52 is a decent mid-range phone except for its occasional stutters. The phone also has a lot to offer in terms of display, cameras and battery life. Galaxy A52 will most likely be a no brainer for Samsung fans seeing how the Galaxy A51 was a best-seller. But those looking for better value-for-money options can definitely consider checking out Redmi Note 10 Pro Max, and Realme X7 5G.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/04/2021
Source: Pokde

The Samsung Galaxy A52 is quite an interesting smartphone. For RM1,499, you get 4 years of guaranteed software support, an experience that is typically reserved for their more premium smartphones. You get decent build quality, punchy colours on the display, 90Hz refresh rate, a good camera system, IP67, stereo speakers, headphone jack is included, and a pretty solid battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 75% workmanship: 70%
Source: GSM Arena

There's honestly very little to actually criticize about the Galaxy A52. Sure, the Snapdragon 720G is not the quickest chip around, but it doesn't seem to be holding back the experience in any practical way. Samsung's "Awesome is for everyone" slogan actually rings very true here. We, for one, are on board and give the A52 a hearty recommendation.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: XDA Developers

The Samsung Galaxy A52 brings many improvements over the older generations. While the hardware gets a major upgrade, the smartphone’s software experience is likely to drive many users looking for a long-lasting phone that can replace their old iPhone SE’s and XR’s. The improved experience includes a superior display, better cameras, and fast charging. Meanwhile, the Snapdragon 720G chipset brings improved performance, better thermal stability, and support for the Google Camera mod compared to counterparts in the Exynos family.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2021
Source: The Indian Express

You are probably eyeing a flagship smartphone for months but have no budget to spend Rs 80,000 on a phone, especially during the pandemic. But the fact is there is no need to spend a ridiculous amount on a smartphone when you get a much capable phone for way less. Samsung’s new Galaxy A52, even though a premium mid-range phone, offers pretty much every feature you would wish to get in a high-end phone including a high refresh rate display, IP67 dust and water resistance, and even stereo speakers. With the Galaxy A52 starting at Rs 26,499, this smartphone sets a benchmark for premium mid-range devices.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Sam Mobile

The Galaxy A52 is the best mid-range phone from Samsung yet. Actually, it feels a lot like a high-end phone, and in some markets, that’s the reason why it’s priced a little above the Galaxy A51. It’s a good thing then that you’re getting an excellent phone. The only disadvantage I see is that you are still getting a macro camera instead of a zoom camera, and perhaps the stereo speakers could have been louder. Other than that, the Galaxy A52 does everything right, and you can order one with your eyes closed if you’re in the market for a sub-$400 phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2021
Source: Android Central

The Galaxy A52 brings exciting upgrades in all key areas. You get a gorgeous design with pastel hues, lag-free performance, responsive 90Hz display, IP67 water resistance, outstanding battery life, cameras that take great photos, and three guaranteed Android updates.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Sam Mobile

On paper, the Galaxy A52 is a fantastic phone, with a plethora of high-end features one could only dream of seeing on Samsung’s mid-range devices until last year. Just how well those specs come together in practice is something we will tell you in our full review in the next couple of days, but we think we can say with absolute certainty that Samsung has another winner of a mid-range phone in its hands, one that could outsell both the Galaxy A50 and Galaxy A51 combined.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/20/2021
Source: Engadget

Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 03/19/2021
Source: NDTV Gadgets

The Galaxy A52 is a good-looking smartphone and is sure to grab eyeballs. The cameras also seem to be in line with what one should expect at this price point, going by their specifications. However, I have some reservations about the choice of processor here. Can the Galaxy A52 change my mind? Stay tuned to Gadgets 360 to find out in the full review, coming up soon.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/19/2021
Source: Yugatech

Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Computerbild

Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 04/22/2022
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/28/2022
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 72% features: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Chinahandys.net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 70% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 75%
Source: Curved

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/21/2021
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 80% performance: 75% display: 85% mobility: 81%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/15/2021
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 85% features: 90% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Gizmodo Brasil

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/16/2021
Source: Canaltech

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/21/2021
Source: Showmetech.com.br

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 75% performance: 85% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mais Tecnologia

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/05/2021
Source: DDay IT

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Batista70Phone

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/03/2021
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% features: 77%
Source: Chimera Revo

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 75% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Techzine

Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 06/12/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computer Totaal

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Want.nl

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/10/2021
Source: Fredzone

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/18/2021
Source: Antyweb

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2021
Source: Log.com.tr

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/31/2021
Rating: Total score: 81%
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/15/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/01/2021
Source: Zing

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/27/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/22/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/17/2021
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/10/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/28/2021
Source: Zing

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/24/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/19/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/18/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/18/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Jagat Review

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Rating: features: 79%
Source: Mobility.bg

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/26/2021
Source: Alt om Data

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 83% performance: 67%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Specifications

Processor: Mediatek Mediatek Helio G80
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G52 MP2
Display: 6.40 inch, 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.186kg
Price: 229 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
如果你有时是这样想的,并且正在寻找一款不支持最新移动通信标准的中档智能手机,那么三星为你提供了一个报价。Galaxy A22 4G比其5G版本更紧凑,但在类似的价格下也更慢。那么,4G智能手机是否只是5G狂热者的东西?
Foreign Reviews
Source: Ricks Tech

Support, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/04/2022
Source: Ricks Tech

Support, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/04/2022
Source: GSM Arena

Samsung has really been putting in the work when it comes to the current Galaxy A lineup. Pretty much every model from the family recently has been solid and generally competitive in one way or another. The same is mostly true for the Galaxy A22 as well. The LTE Galaxy A22 is a well-put-together device, with a solid-performing AMOLED panel, complete with 90Hz refresh rate and straight-forward refresh rate handling (even if lower-res). The Galaxy A22 also manages great battery endurance from its 5,000 mAh battery, has a surprisingly feature-rich One UI 3.1 Core skin running on top of Android 11 and uses the decent, if unimpressive MediaTek Helio G80 chipset to its full potential. It has its fair share of issues and deficiencies as well, though. The plastic body feels a bit hollow at the back, it lacks any formal ingress protection or a "brand name" designation for its protective display glass. There are also no light or proximity sensors onboard the A22; charging is pretty slow, and the single bottom-firing loudspeaker is unimpressive.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 64%
Source: GSM Arena

Samsung has really been putting in the work when it comes to the current Galaxy A lineup. Pretty much every model from the family recently has been solid and generally competitive in one way or another. The same is mostly true for the Galaxy A22 as well. The LTE Galaxy A22 is a well-put-together device, with a solid-performing AMOLED panel, complete with 90Hz refresh rate and straight-forward refresh rate handling (even if lower-res). The Galaxy A22 also manages great battery endurance from its 5,000 mAh battery, has a surprisingly feature-rich One UI 3.1 Core skin running on top of Android 11 and uses the decent, if unimpressive MediaTek Helio G80 chipset to its full potential. It has its fair share of issues and deficiencies as well, though. The plastic body feels a bit hollow at the back, it lacks any formal ingress protection or a "brand name" designation for its protective display glass. There are also no light or proximity sensors onboard the A22; charging is pretty slow, and the single bottom-firing loudspeaker is unimpressive.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 64%
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal

So, let’s wrap up this review of the Samsung Galaxy A22. Should you buy it? I think the answer is region-specific. That’s because the A22 costs the same as the M32 here in Nepal, so in this case, my recommendation would be to go with the A22 because it’s better-optimized, has a better camera, and more importantly, it feels like you are holding a premium phone. However, if you are living in India, the A22 at INR 18,500 is a bit on the expensive side which makes it an easy no for me. Plus, Samsung has also launched the costlier 5G variant of A22, which is even more ridiculously priced. And like I said in my Poco M3 Pro review, the sad truth with almost every mid-range 5G phone right now is that they are priced quite absurdly and you might want to skip them until and unless you absolutely want 5G.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/08/2021
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal

So, let’s wrap up this review of the Samsung Galaxy A22. Should you buy it? I think the answer is region-specific. That’s because the A22 costs the same as the M32 here in Nepal, so in this case, my recommendation would be to go with the A22 because it’s better-optimized, has a better camera, and more importantly, it feels like you are holding a premium phone. However, if you are living in India, the A22 at INR 18,500 is a bit on the expensive side which makes it an easy no for me. Plus, Samsung has also launched the costlier 5G variant of A22, which is even more ridiculously priced. And like I said in my Poco M3 Pro review, the sad truth with almost every mid-range 5G phone right now is that they are priced quite absurdly and you might want to skip them until and unless you absolutely want 5G.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/08/2021
Source: Cashify

Samsung Galaxy A22 is a cheaper alternative to Galaxy M32. Although OIS on the primary camera steals the show, the camera setup is largely capped with the potential of the underwhelming processor aka G80 SoC. A slightly powerful processor and an FHD+ display could have made a lot of difference. For Rs 18,499/-, the device feels a bit pricey since you can get a powerful processor and FHD+ displays on many of its rivals at this price tag.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/11/2021
Source: Cashify

Samsung Galaxy A22 is a cheaper alternative to Galaxy M32. Although OIS on the primary camera steals the show, the camera setup is largely capped with the potential of the underwhelming processor aka G80 SoC. A slightly powerful processor and an FHD+ display could have made a lot of difference. For Rs 18,499/-, the device feels a bit pricey since you can get a powerful processor and FHD+ displays on many of its rivals at this price tag.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/11/2021
Source: OI Spice Tech News

It is difficult to recommend that the overall features of both the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and A22 4g smartphones devices overlap. But if you are looking for better camera technology, you might prefer the A22 4G. But on the other hand, if you are considering a phone for the long term, then the Galaxy A22 5G could be a great option in that case. However, you will get standard camera results. It’s not like there are flaws in both models, but minimal ones for the superb privileges. On that note, there is always room for an alternative. If you’re looking for the most valuable phone, check out the Realme X7 smartphone a worthwhile decision.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/01/2021
Source: OI Spice Tech News

It is difficult to recommend that the overall features of both the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and A22 4g smartphones devices overlap. But if you are looking for better camera technology, you might prefer the A22 4G. But on the other hand, if you are considering a phone for the long term, then the Galaxy A22 5G could be a great option in that case. However, you will get standard camera results. It’s not like there are flaws in both models, but minimal ones for the superb privileges. On that note, there is always room for an alternative. If you’re looking for the most valuable phone, check out the Realme X7 smartphone a worthwhile decision.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/01/2021
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/28/2022
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/28/2022
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Ofertaman

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/13/2022
Source: Ofertaman

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/13/2022
Source: Canaltech

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/23/2021
Source: Canaltech

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/23/2021
Source: Charles Tech

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: Charles Tech

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 60%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 60%
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/07/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/07/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/30/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/30/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/23/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/23/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/12/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/12/2021
Source: Genk

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/02/2021
Source: Genk

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/02/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/01/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/01/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/30/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/30/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/29/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/29/2021
Source: Genk

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/24/2021
Source: Genk

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/24/2021
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Specifications

Processor: Mediatek Dimensity 700
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G57 MP2
Display: 6.60 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.203kg
Price: 229 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Galaxy A22有4G或5G两种版本。虽然5G型号不提供OLED显示屏,但它确实提供了快速的互联网,一个多功能的相机系统,以及良好的性能率。我们在评论中仔细研究了三星的中档手机。
Foreign Reviews
Source: Ricks Tech

In this video im doing camera glass replacement on the back of a Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, the same steps are used for A22 4G also
Support, online available, Medium, Date: 05/24/2022
Source: Ricks Tech

In this video im doing camera glass replacement on the back of a Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, the same steps are used for A22 4G also
Support, online available, Medium, Date: 05/24/2022
Source: NDTV Gadgets

The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G doesn't quite deliver the kind of experience that most people would expect, considering its price and competition. A wide selection of 5G bands would be a good thing to brag about, provided one could actually take advantage of them in India, but I'm pretty sure that by the time we get to use 5G, we will have had multiple successors to this phone. Unfortunately, there's little else to get excited about with the Galaxy A22 5G. In fact, I feel you'd be better served by Samsung's own Galaxy M32 5G or even the Galaxy F62. There's no shortage of good phones from the competition either, and a quick look though our list of the best phones under Rs. 20,000 and Rs. 25,000 should offer plenty of options.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: NDTV Gadgets

The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G doesn't quite deliver the kind of experience that most people would expect, considering its price and competition. A wide selection of 5G bands would be a good thing to brag about, provided one could actually take advantage of them in India, but I'm pretty sure that by the time we get to use 5G, we will have had multiple successors to this phone. Unfortunately, there's little else to get excited about with the Galaxy A22 5G. In fact, I feel you'd be better served by Samsung's own Galaxy M32 5G or even the Galaxy F62. There's no shortage of good phones from the competition either, and a quick look though our list of the best phones under Rs. 20,000 and Rs. 25,000 should offer plenty of options.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Think Digit

As a phone for the average user, there's very little to fault the Galaxy A22 5G for. The phone offers solid build quality, a good design and also a nice display. It also does well in the battery department and offers cameras that promise good daytime performance as well as low-light photography with the help of the camera's Night Mode. To top it all, it's 5G ready and also packs plenty of power to handle apps of daily use -- I.e of course, if you're looking to not run too many graphics-intensive games on it. Despite there being a lot of options in the segment, the Galaxy A22 5G still manages to emerge as a good option in the sub-Rs 20,000 segments of the market. So, if you're looking for a new 5G phone in this price range, and especially one from Samsung's stables, then this is definitely the device for you.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 63% performance: 59% workmanship: 70%
Source: Think Digit

As a phone for the average user, there's very little to fault the Galaxy A22 5G for. The phone offers solid build quality, a good design and also a nice display. It also does well in the battery department and offers cameras that promise good daytime performance as well as low-light photography with the help of the camera's Night Mode. To top it all, it's 5G ready and also packs plenty of power to handle apps of daily use -- I.e of course, if you're looking to not run too many graphics-intensive games on it. Despite there being a lot of options in the segment, the Galaxy A22 5G still manages to emerge as a good option in the sub-Rs 20,000 segments of the market. So, if you're looking for a new 5G phone in this price range, and especially one from Samsung's stables, then this is definitely the device for you.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 63% performance: 59% workmanship: 70%
Source: Think Digit

As a phone for the average user, there's very little to fault the Galaxy A22 5G for. The phone offers solid build quality, a good design and also a nice display. It also does well in the battery department and offers cameras that promise good daytime performance as well as low-light photography with the help of the camera's Night Mode. To top it all, it's 5G ready and also packs plenty of power to handle apps of daily use -- I.e of course, if you're looking to not run too many graphics-intensive games on it. Despite there being a lot of options in the segment, the Galaxy A22 5G still manages to emerge as a good option in the sub-Rs 20,000 segments of the market. So, if you're looking for a new 5G phone in this price range, and especially one from Samsung's stables, then this is definitely the device for you.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 63% performance: 59% workmanship: 70%
Source: Think Digit

As a phone for the average user, there's very little to fault the Galaxy A22 5G for. The phone offers solid build quality, a good design and also a nice display. It also does well in the battery department and offers cameras that promise good daytime performance as well as low-light photography with the help of the camera's Night Mode. To top it all, it's 5G ready and also packs plenty of power to handle apps of daily use -- I.e of course, if you're looking to not run too many graphics-intensive games on it. Despite there being a lot of options in the segment, the Galaxy A22 5G still manages to emerge as a good option in the sub-Rs 20,000 segments of the market. So, if you're looking for a new 5G phone in this price range, and especially one from Samsung's stables, then this is definitely the device for you.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 63% performance: 59% workmanship: 70%
Source: DxOMark

The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a smartphone aimed at budget-minded users and competes against other devices in the Advanced segment ($200 to 399). General specs include an octa-core processor, a 6.6-inch TFT display with FHD+ resolution, 64 GB of internal memory, and a large 5000 mAh battery. The rear camera comprises a primary module with a 48 MP sensor, a 5 MP ultra-wide, and a depth sensor. Let’s see how this combo does in the DXOMARK Camera tests.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/07/2021
Source: DxOMark

The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a smartphone aimed at budget-minded users and competes against other devices in the Advanced segment ($200 to 399). General specs include an octa-core processor, a 6.6-inch TFT display with FHD+ resolution, 64 GB of internal memory, and a large 5000 mAh battery. The rear camera comprises a primary module with a 48 MP sensor, a 5 MP ultra-wide, and a depth sensor. Let’s see how this combo does in the DXOMARK Camera tests.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/07/2021
Source: Cashify

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G rips off almost the same specifications as its 4G counterpart but with some downgrades to accommodate for the “5G network”. The battery is well-specced although Samsung should’ve gone for faster charging speed. For an informed decision, Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a tonne of alternatives such as Samsung Galaxy A32 (FHD, Super AMOLED, 90Hz) while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, the Poco X3 Pro, or you can check out Realme 8 5G which scores better than A22 5G on various benchmarking tests even with the same processor. Other alternatives include Redmi Note 10T 5G, Redmi Note 10 5G, and Poco M3 Pro 5G just to mention.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/27/2021
Source: Cashify

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G rips off almost the same specifications as its 4G counterpart but with some downgrades to accommodate for the “5G network”. The battery is well-specced although Samsung should’ve gone for faster charging speed. For an informed decision, Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a tonne of alternatives such as Samsung Galaxy A32 (FHD, Super AMOLED, 90Hz) while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, the Poco X3 Pro, or you can check out Realme 8 5G which scores better than A22 5G on various benchmarking tests even with the same processor. Other alternatives include Redmi Note 10T 5G, Redmi Note 10 5G, and Poco M3 Pro 5G just to mention.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/27/2021
Source: The Indian Express

While a few features are missing, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is still a good option under Rs 20,000 price segment. If you are someone who wants to buy a Samsung phone for general usage, then you can buy this mid-range phone and be prepared for the dawn of 4G.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: The Indian Express

While a few features are missing, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is still a good option under Rs 20,000 price segment. If you are someone who wants to buy a Samsung phone for general usage, then you can buy this mid-range phone and be prepared for the dawn of 4G.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Sam Mobile

These days, I’m judging Samsung’s affordable and mid-range phones based on how quickly I want to move back to a flagship device after the review, and the A22 5G passes with flying colors. All I missed were the considerably better cameras you get on flagships – nothing else truly bothered me, which is the highest praise I can give this phone. The A22 5G has a smooth display, excellent performance and battery life, decent main camera, and a cute little design. On the flip side, the software is too basic, an AMOLED screen would have been much better, the bezels should have been smaller, and you’re still having to make do with Samsung’s old and slow 15W charging tech.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/07/2021
Source: Sam Mobile

These days, I’m judging Samsung’s affordable and mid-range phones based on how quickly I want to move back to a flagship device after the review, and the A22 5G passes with flying colors. All I missed were the considerably better cameras you get on flagships – nothing else truly bothered me, which is the highest praise I can give this phone. The A22 5G has a smooth display, excellent performance and battery life, decent main camera, and a cute little design. On the flip side, the software is too basic, an AMOLED screen would have been much better, the bezels should have been smaller, and you’re still having to make do with Samsung’s old and slow 15W charging tech.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/07/2021
Source: Gadgets Now

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a good looking phone with long battery life, support for a number of 5G bands and offers decent performance in terms of multi-tasking. However, at a starting price of Rs 19,999, the smartphone faces tough competition from many lower-priced phones from rival brands as well as Samsung’s own Galaxy M31s, Galaxy M51 and Galaxy F41.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Gadgets Now

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a good looking phone with long battery life, support for a number of 5G bands and offers decent performance in terms of multi-tasking. However, at a starting price of Rs 19,999, the smartphone faces tough competition from many lower-priced phones from rival brands as well as Samsung’s own Galaxy M31s, Galaxy M51 and Galaxy F41.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: The Mobile Indian

Shots taken under artificial lighting were decent again. The colours looked vibrant, while details were minimal. And the software again struggled to give accurate edge detection. Coming to night mode shots, these pictures looked atrocious. There’s no amount of detailing you can expect, and there’s a smudged effect all over the pictures. Wide-angle in night conditions behaves like a VGA camera with no sort of colours or details. Night mode didn’t make things better either.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/31/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 70%
Source: The Mobile Indian

Shots taken under artificial lighting were decent again. The colours looked vibrant, while details were minimal. And the software again struggled to give accurate edge detection. Coming to night mode shots, these pictures looked atrocious. There’s no amount of detailing you can expect, and there’s a smudged effect all over the pictures. Wide-angle in night conditions behaves like a VGA camera with no sort of colours or details. Night mode didn’t make things better either.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/31/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 70%
Source: GSM Arena

And that's kind of leads to the elephant in the room - should you even get a 5G phone for under €250? If you really need 5G in your next device and can't stretch your budget any further, then the Galaxy A22 5G is worth considering. If you can compromise and settle for a 4G model instead, there is much more overall value to be had from other devices in this price range.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 64%
Source: GSM Arena

And that's kind of leads to the elephant in the room - should you even get a 5G phone for under €250? If you really need 5G in your next device and can't stretch your budget any further, then the Galaxy A22 5G is worth considering. If you can compromise and settle for a 4G model instead, there is much more overall value to be had from other devices in this price range.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 64%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/06/2022
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/06/2022
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/07/2022
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/07/2022
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Nextpit Germany

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Nextpit Germany

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/04/2021
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/04/2021
Source: Tutto Android

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/16/2021
Source: Tutto Android

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/16/2021
Source: Nextpit France

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Nextpit France

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 50%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 50%
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/06/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/06/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/04/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/04/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/31/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/31/2021
Source: Genk

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/23/2021
Source: Genk

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/23/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/17/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/17/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 06/27/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 06/27/2021
Source: Genk

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/25/2021
Source: Genk

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/25/2021
Source: TechTimes VN

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/25/2021
Source: TechTimes VN

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/25/2021
Source: Jagat Review

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/08/2021
Source: Jagat Review

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/08/2021
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Specifications

Processor: Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 6.50 inch, 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.196kg
Price: 160 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
与去年相比,三星在Galaxy A03s上没有什么变化。这款非常实惠的手机至少配备了更稳定的Wi-Fi,这也是我们对前代产品最大的批评点之一。Galaxy A03s是否值得购买,还是160欧元的价格太贵?
Foreign Reviews
Source: CNet

I'd recommend the Galaxy A03S to anyone who wants to spend less than $200 on a new Samsung phone. Since it's the newest of the three phones, it'll get more years of software and security updates. I also found that it offered respectable performance for the price. While the A12 does take better photos, I didn't think the step up in quality was worth the extra $20. Instead, buy the A03S and invest that $20 toward the microSD card you'll need. If you wanted to check out other sub-$200 phones that aren't made by Samsung, Motorola has the $160 Moto G Pure phone and a $200 Moto G Power phone. The OnePlus Nord N200 5G goes slightly above the $200 threshold at $240, but it offers 5G connectivity.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 04/17/2022
Source: CNet

I'd recommend the Galaxy A03S to anyone who wants to spend less than $200 on a new Samsung phone. Since it's the newest of the three phones, it'll get more years of software and security updates. I also found that it offered respectable performance for the price. While the A12 does take better photos, I didn't think the step up in quality was worth the extra $20. Instead, buy the A03S and invest that $20 toward the microSD card you'll need. If you wanted to check out other sub-$200 phones that aren't made by Samsung, Motorola has the $160 Moto G Pure phone and a $200 Moto G Power phone. The OnePlus Nord N200 5G goes slightly above the $200 threshold at $240, but it offers 5G connectivity.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 04/17/2022
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A03s has increased in price from last year, giving even more rivals to square off against. Motorola’s Moto G Play ($169) is perhaps the closest competition, with a nearly identical set of cameras and a marginally more powerful Snapdragon 460 processor. However, it offers even slower charging, less base RAM and storage, and does not support NFC for contactless payments. If you want a slightly upgraded Motorola option, the Moto G Pure ($159) ships with Android 11 out of the box and a basic IP rating. If you don’t mind spending a bit more, the Samsung Galaxy A13 ($249) and Nokia X100 ($252) are affordable ways to add 5G to the mix. Nokia’s device adds a 48MP primary camera with a sharp Full HD+ display but falls short on software updates. The Galaxy A13, on the other hand, offers a 50MP camera with Samsung’s robust update policy and a sleek, minimalist design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/31/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A03s has increased in price from last year, giving even more rivals to square off against. Motorola’s Moto G Play ($169) is perhaps the closest competition, with a nearly identical set of cameras and a marginally more powerful Snapdragon 460 processor. However, it offers even slower charging, less base RAM and storage, and does not support NFC for contactless payments. If you want a slightly upgraded Motorola option, the Moto G Pure ($159) ships with Android 11 out of the box and a basic IP rating. If you don’t mind spending a bit more, the Samsung Galaxy A13 ($249) and Nokia X100 ($252) are affordable ways to add 5G to the mix. Nokia’s device adds a 48MP primary camera with a sharp Full HD+ display but falls short on software updates. The Galaxy A13, on the other hand, offers a 50MP camera with Samsung’s robust update policy and a sleek, minimalist design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/31/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: GSM Arena

The Galaxy A03s is a good entry-level smartphone - that's undeniable. It has a good screen, a reliable battery, a recent Android OS with OneUI interface, and a non-nonsense primary camera. Unfortunately, the A03s feels overpriced for what it offers - there are much better phones on the same shelf. If it were priced around €100-€110, it would have been a great competitive offer, a worthy budget phone. So, if you can get the Galaxy A03s with a price cut that makes sense - we'd recommend it for its skills. But for now - we'd suggest looking elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 52%
Source: GSM Arena

The Galaxy A03s is a good entry-level smartphone - that's undeniable. It has a good screen, a reliable battery, a recent Android OS with OneUI interface, and a non-nonsense primary camera. Unfortunately, the A03s feels overpriced for what it offers - there are much better phones on the same shelf. If it were priced around €100-€110, it would have been a great competitive offer, a worthy budget phone. So, if you can get the Galaxy A03s with a price cut that makes sense - we'd recommend it for its skills. But for now - we'd suggest looking elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 52%
Source: Unbox

We’ve found that in our Samsung Galaxy A03s Hands-On that the device does cover a lot of the basics if you’re looking for a more affordable option from the Korean brand; coming in at Php 6,490 or if you’re lucky to catch it on sale — Php 5,990. Unfortunately, we all know that there are some serious tough contenders out there that pretty much rule the roost. If you’re sen on getting a Samsung device and can increase your budget a bit, then we suggest taking a look at the Galaxy M22 as an option.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/29/2021
Source: Unbox

We’ve found that in our Samsung Galaxy A03s Hands-On that the device does cover a lot of the basics if you’re looking for a more affordable option from the Korean brand; coming in at Php 6,490 or if you’re lucky to catch it on sale — Php 5,990. Unfortunately, we all know that there are some serious tough contenders out there that pretty much rule the roost. If you’re sen on getting a Samsung device and can increase your budget a bit, then we suggest taking a look at the Galaxy M22 as an option.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/29/2021
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal

All in all, considering Samsung’s recent budget launches, the Galaxy A03s is a pretty average offering. It has a solid design, an above-average primary camera, and a reliable battery life. That being said, Samsung could have done better in the performance department seeing how Chinese companies offer the same CPU-memory configuration for much cheaper. Its slow charging speed is also a headache material.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 70% performance: 60% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal

All in all, considering Samsung’s recent budget launches, the Galaxy A03s is a pretty average offering. It has a solid design, an above-average primary camera, and a reliable battery life. That being said, Samsung could have done better in the performance department seeing how Chinese companies offer the same CPU-memory configuration for much cheaper. Its slow charging speed is also a headache material.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 70% performance: 60% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: OI Spice Tech News

It is clearly seen that the Samsung Galaxy A03s smartphone is a strong competitor of the Galaxy M02s which has more advanced features with the same budget. While the battery and chipset can be strong features on the Galaxy A03s, they don’t get much attention from users. There aren’t any spectacular features worth mentioning, but it’s interesting to know that you’ll get some premium services, including Samsung Health, Samsung Members, and Smart Switch. There shouldn’t be a lot of enthusiasm for these features because most Samsung phones come with these starter features. This 4G product is available especially in India, but you also have alternatives. If you are looking for an alternative our recommendation would be the OnePlus Nord N200 smartphone. Every device has some decent features that are worth your money and everyone’s purposes of use.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/13/2021
Source: OI Spice Tech News

It is clearly seen that the Samsung Galaxy A03s smartphone is a strong competitor of the Galaxy M02s which has more advanced features with the same budget. While the battery and chipset can be strong features on the Galaxy A03s, they don’t get much attention from users. There aren’t any spectacular features worth mentioning, but it’s interesting to know that you’ll get some premium services, including Samsung Health, Samsung Members, and Smart Switch. There shouldn’t be a lot of enthusiasm for these features because most Samsung phones come with these starter features. This 4G product is available especially in India, but you also have alternatives. If you are looking for an alternative our recommendation would be the OnePlus Nord N200 smartphone. Every device has some decent features that are worth your money and everyone’s purposes of use.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/13/2021
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/03/2022
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/03/2022
Source: News Bytes

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/11/2021
Source: News Bytes

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/11/2021
Source: Canaltech

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/03/2022
Source: Canaltech

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/03/2022
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: MobilArena HU

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 60% display: 40% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: MobilArena HU

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 60% display: 40% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/02/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/02/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/01/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/01/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/01/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/01/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/17/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/17/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/07/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/07/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/31/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/31/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/28/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/28/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 08/25/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 08/25/2021
Source: FPT shop

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 08/24/2021
Source: FPT shop

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 08/24/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/23/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/23/2021
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Specifications

Processor: Samsung Exynos 850
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G52 MP1
Display: 6.50 inch, 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.205kg
Price: 170 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Galaxy A12 Nacho在我们的审查中显示出良好的功能,但也有一些弱点。与Galaxy A12一样,这款三星手机的定价也非常有吸引力。阅读我们的评论,了解这款入门级的智能手机是否值得购买。
Foreign Reviews
Source: OI Spice Tech News

Except for the Exynos 850 chipset, the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho is an overall good smartphone in the low-budget segment. Where Galaxy has a huge collection, Nacho is one more phone that adds to the Galaxy A12 series. Since the phone is not available globally, there is no way for you to access it. Either you have to wait or go to the alternative. According to company information, they may be available on their official website. This colorful smartphone is a good choice for everyone looking for a low-budget smartphone with lots of awesome specs. If you’re spending $149 (Rs 12,000), the Galaxy A12 Nacho is an amazing smartphone that’s worth your money. There is also the Realme C25Y at the same price, otherwise, you can check for the TCL 20R smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/17/2021
Source: OI Spice Tech News

Except for the Exynos 850 chipset, the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho is an overall good smartphone in the low-budget segment. Where Galaxy has a huge collection, Nacho is one more phone that adds to the Galaxy A12 series. Since the phone is not available globally, there is no way for you to access it. Either you have to wait or go to the alternative. According to company information, they may be available on their official website. This colorful smartphone is a good choice for everyone looking for a low-budget smartphone with lots of awesome specs. If you’re spending $149 (Rs 12,000), the Galaxy A12 Nacho is an amazing smartphone that’s worth your money. There is also the Realme C25Y at the same price, otherwise, you can check for the TCL 20R smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/17/2021
Samsung Galaxy A03
Specifications

Processor: T606
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G57 MP1
Display: 6.50 inch, 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.196kg
Price: 160 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
前代产品有点落后于它的时代,但三星通过Galaxy A03在低价手机领域明显赶上了。快速的Wi-Fi和新的摄像头是否足以真正撼动竞争者?
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tech Nave

The Samsung Galaxy A03 provides a decent user experience for most people, especially those who simply expect the phone to do daily tasks. Compared to the Galaxy A03s, the Galaxy A03 offers faster performance, though it's not very noticeable. Serious users will probably notice the difference, especially when opening apps. However, one drawback to the Galaxy A03 is the micro-USB port, which I think should not be used nowadays. Ultimately, the choice is yours. For the price, I definitely recommend the Galaxy A03 as you will get a better value with the performance of the Unisoc T606. At RM469, it's also cheaper than the A03s (RM559). Other suitable alternatives for this phone include the vivo Y20 (RM459), realme Narzo 50i (RM449), OPPO A16 (RM479), and Redmi 9C (RM449). Are you interested in this smartphone? Share your thoughts in the comments, and stay tuned to TechNave for more reviews like this.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/02/2022
Source: Tech Nave

The Samsung Galaxy A03 provides a decent user experience for most people, especially those who simply expect the phone to do daily tasks. Compared to the Galaxy A03s, the Galaxy A03 offers faster performance, though it's not very noticeable. Serious users will probably notice the difference, especially when opening apps. However, one drawback to the Galaxy A03 is the micro-USB port, which I think should not be used nowadays. Ultimately, the choice is yours. For the price, I definitely recommend the Galaxy A03 as you will get a better value with the performance of the Unisoc T606. At RM469, it's also cheaper than the A03s (RM559). Other suitable alternatives for this phone include the vivo Y20 (RM459), realme Narzo 50i (RM449), OPPO A16 (RM479), and Redmi 9C (RM449). Are you interested in this smartphone? Share your thoughts in the comments, and stay tuned to TechNave for more reviews like this.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/02/2022
Source: NLT

So, for the price of starting price of RM439, this is indeed a very capable phone. However, the RM469 variant only comes with 3GB RAM and 32GB of storage – which I think is just way too little even though this phone has a microSD card slot. There is another variant with 4GB RAM and 64GB of storage but it is priced at RM549. Still, I think for the price of RM549, it’s a decent price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/08/2022
Source: NLT

So, for the price of starting price of RM439, this is indeed a very capable phone. However, the RM469 variant only comes with 3GB RAM and 32GB of storage – which I think is just way too little even though this phone has a microSD card slot. There is another variant with 4GB RAM and 64GB of storage but it is priced at RM549. Still, I think for the price of RM549, it’s a decent price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/08/2022
Source: Hitech Century

The Samsung Galaxy A03 is an exemplary example of a budget phone with a large display and a huge battery along with the added bonus of a 3.5mm audio jack and expandable memory via a dedicated microSD card slot. For RM549, you’re getting a well built, affordable phone that is a solid shot across the bow for other budget phone vendors. The cheaper variant does look tempting but it’s well worth the extra outlay to get more RAM and storage. The Samsung Galaxy A03 epitomises the ideals of a budget phone with essential features that include a large display and long battery life with a fair performance to price ratio at a modest price tag.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/02/2022
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Hitech Century

The Samsung Galaxy A03 is an exemplary example of a budget phone with a large display and a huge battery along with the added bonus of a 3.5mm audio jack and expandable memory via a dedicated microSD card slot. For RM549, you’re getting a well built, affordable phone that is a solid shot across the bow for other budget phone vendors. The cheaper variant does look tempting but it’s well worth the extra outlay to get more RAM and storage. The Samsung Galaxy A03 epitomises the ideals of a budget phone with essential features that include a large display and long battery life with a fair performance to price ratio at a modest price tag.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/02/2022
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: OI Spice Tech News

The Samsung Galaxy A03’s main selling point would be its long battery life and other in-between custom features. Also, you’re looking for a robust battery with decent performance, this phone might not even be a tough fight for the competition and the reason for this is the Samsung brand image. For example, if they launch a cheap phone on the Indian offline market, it will sell like crazy as it is a well-known brand. The same story also applies to other countries. But, we didn’t want our readers to waste their money on something when you can still consider alternative options that provide an exceptional features at a similar price point or a higher level. The Tecno Camon 18T is worth your money, but it costs a little more. But still, if you’re looking for something in Samsung, you have the Galaxy A03 core to check out.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/04/2022
Source: OI Spice Tech News

The Samsung Galaxy A03’s main selling point would be its long battery life and other in-between custom features. Also, you’re looking for a robust battery with decent performance, this phone might not even be a tough fight for the competition and the reason for this is the Samsung brand image. For example, if they launch a cheap phone on the Indian offline market, it will sell like crazy as it is a well-known brand. The same story also applies to other countries. But, we didn’t want our readers to waste their money on something when you can still consider alternative options that provide an exceptional features at a similar price point or a higher level. The Tecno Camon 18T is worth your money, but it costs a little more. But still, if you’re looking for something in Samsung, you have the Galaxy A03 core to check out.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/04/2022
Source: OI Spice Tech News

The Samsung Galaxy A03 is the rebooted version of the Samsung Galaxy A03s announced in November 2021, and the phone is expected to fall in the price range of $150 (Rs 11,999) approx. The phone renders a 6.5-inches PLS IPS display panel that generates average pixel density support, while the aspect ratio is good. As for the processing powers, the phone offers a standard 4x 1.6GHz cloaking speed chipset that renders decent renders mediocre results. In terms of the software layering, the phone is also equipped with the Android 11 OS. Now, speaking of the camera module, the Galaxy A03 brings the 48MP primary camera and 2MP depth sensor that completes the dual camera setup. This setup also includes a 5MP selfie camera at the front. You can record up to 1080p videos from the primary camera. On the other hand, you will obtain impressive screen time with a battery life worth 5000 mAh. Lastly, you can purchase this phone in three exciting colors of Black, Blue, and Red.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/13/2021
Source: OI Spice Tech News

The Samsung Galaxy A03 is the rebooted version of the Samsung Galaxy A03s announced in November 2021, and the phone is expected to fall in the price range of $150 (Rs 11,999) approx. The phone renders a 6.5-inches PLS IPS display panel that generates average pixel density support, while the aspect ratio is good. As for the processing powers, the phone offers a standard 4x 1.6GHz cloaking speed chipset that renders decent renders mediocre results. In terms of the software layering, the phone is also equipped with the Android 11 OS. Now, speaking of the camera module, the Galaxy A03 brings the 48MP primary camera and 2MP depth sensor that completes the dual camera setup. This setup also includes a 5MP selfie camera at the front. You can record up to 1080p videos from the primary camera. On the other hand, you will obtain impressive screen time with a battery life worth 5000 mAh. Lastly, you can purchase this phone in three exciting colors of Black, Blue, and Red.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/13/2021
Source: OI Spice Tech News

The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is one of the basic entry-level smartphones that Samsung released in November 2021, and the expected price is shooting up to $150 (Rs 10,999) approx. On top of that, the phone brings a tall 6.5-inches HD+ TFT screen, and the bezels are pretty thin compared to the competition. As for the performance section, the makers installed a 28nm Unisoc SC9863A chipset that allows users to prefer basic daily tasks with a bit exposure of to multitasking. The phone provides an 8MP rear camera on the back panel that can record up to 1080p videos without any problem. At the same time, you will also get a 5MP selfie camera. In terms of battery life, the massive Li-Po 5000 mAh battery support gives a bit of hope to get decent screen time. Apart from this, you can choose the Galaxy A03 Core smartphone in black and blue color options.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/26/2021
Source: OI Spice Tech News

The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is one of the basic entry-level smartphones that Samsung released in November 2021, and the expected price is shooting up to $150 (Rs 10,999) approx. On top of that, the phone brings a tall 6.5-inches HD+ TFT screen, and the bezels are pretty thin compared to the competition. As for the performance section, the makers installed a 28nm Unisoc SC9863A chipset that allows users to prefer basic daily tasks with a bit exposure of to multitasking. The phone provides an 8MP rear camera on the back panel that can record up to 1080p videos without any problem. At the same time, you will also get a 5MP selfie camera. In terms of battery life, the massive Li-Po 5000 mAh battery support gives a bit of hope to get decent screen time. Apart from this, you can choose the Galaxy A03 Core smartphone in black and blue color options.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/26/2021
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/23/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/23/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/22/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/22/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/30/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/30/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/25/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/25/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/21/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/21/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/18/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/18/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/18/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/18/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/15/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/15/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/13/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/13/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/12/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/12/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/10/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/10/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/10/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/10/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/07/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/07/2022
Source: Cell Phones

Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 01/04/2022
Source: Cell Phones

Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 01/04/2022
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/03/2022
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/03/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/26/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/26/2021
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/24/2016
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/24/2016
Source: Jagat Review

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/02/2022
Source: Jagat Review

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/02/2022
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Specifications

Processor: Mediatek Dimensity 700
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G57 MP2
Display: 6.50 inch, 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.195kg
Price: 250 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Authority

Samsung’s Galaxy A13 offers the most complete package of any A10 series device to date, but it does so at a cost. The addition of 5G provides better longevity than previous models, it’s more powerful than ever, and the 50MP primary camera offers pleasing results in good lighting. However, the lack of improvements to the peripheral cameras and missing ultrawide shooter, the weak display, and the bland design raise some questions about the $70 price increase. I can’t help but feel that Samsung would’ve been better off skipping 5G and making improvements to the rest of the package instead to make it a better overall starter smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/03/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: The Verge

The Galaxy A13 5G doesn’t offer much in the way of surprises, good or bad. For $249, it’s a reliable device with good performance, healthy battery life, and a decent camera. None of this comes as a surprise because Samsung makes a lot of these kinds of phones, and it’s something the company is very good at. The phone launched in the US as an AT&T exclusive; now, you can buy it unlocked or through T-Mobile, too. But that initial carrier relationship plays into what might be the most compelling reason to look at the A13 5G right now: it’s certified to use AT&T’s newly enabled C-band spectrum. This is the variety of 5G that promises faster-than-4G speeds and good signal reach — a combination that some US 5G networks have been lacking until now. The list of C-band enabled devices at the network’s launch was short and dominated by pricey flagships, with the exception of the Galaxy A13 5G.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/02/2022
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: OI Spice Tech News

Overall the Samsung Galaxy A13 is a decent smartphone that has a large display, huge battery support, gaming processor, and enhanced performance due to 7nm technology and users would enjoy a 5G support. Definitely, the camera department may disappoint some users, but overall, this is a good smartphone from a reliable brand at an affordable cost. But it has missed some industry-standard features, as there is no AMOLED display, no Gorilla Glass protection, no gyro-EIS sensor, and also don’t have any IP certification. If you are not ready to go with the Samsung Galaxy A13, and looking for an alternative option definitely take a look at the Motorola Moto G71 smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/05/2022
Source: OI Spice Tech News

The Samsung Galaxy A13 was released in December 2021 and the price is around $249 (Rs 18,599 in India). Apart from this, the phone will offer a 6.5-inches PLS TFT display that will render decent 90Hz, 270 PPI density, HD resolution, the software layering presents an Andriod 11 sets based on One UI interface, 7nm – MediaTek MT6833 Dimensity 700 5G chipset under the hood, Mali-G57 MC2 GPU to support visuals, a triple camera setup offering a 50MP primary snapper, a 5MP selfie port with 1080p video recording, a massive 5000 mAh battery comes with a 15W fast-charging brick. For color, you get only one – Black. as well as the phone is configured with only a 4GB RAM variant along with 64 GB internal storage.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/24/2021
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
Specifications

Processor: SC9863A
Graphics Adapter: PowerVR GE8322 / IMG8322
Display: 6.50 inch, 220:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.211kg
Price: 110 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal

To conclude, the Galaxy A03 Core doesn’t have the fastest of specs on paper, but Samsung has optimized the software well to run on low specs. I see it as a viable option for people looking for a basic starter phone—or something to get them through online classes on a really tight budget. Everything from its design, display, to the battery are worth the price. That being said, I would have liked it more if Samsung had added Camera Go and given at least 10W charging support.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/14/2022
Rating: Total score: 71% price: 85% display: 65% mobility: 85% workmanship: 70%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Specifications

Processor: Samsung Exynos 850
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G52 MP1
Display: 6.60 inch, 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.195kg
Price: 189 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
以低于200美元的价格,三星Galaxy A13 4G提供了一个全高清屏幕和Wi-Fi 5。然而,它面临着强大的竞争。与去年的机型相比,其改进是否足以使其具有竞争力?
Foreign Reviews
Source: Ricks Tech

Support, online available, Medium, Date: 05/17/2022
Source: Ricks Tech

Support, online available, Medium, Date: 05/17/2022
Source: Tech Advisor

The Galaxy A13 should be a slam dunk for Samsung. Anyone looking for a budget phone will see the brand, the low price and think it’s a safe bet. But with such poor performance compared to certain rivals, it isn’t. As long as you’re happy to accept that this isn’t going to feel like a fast device and you’re tempted by the good main camera and Samsung OneUI, then at the discounted prices you’ll find from retailers, it’s just about worth buying. But for the Galaxy A13’s RRP, you can get far better performance as well as luxuries such as a 90Hz AMOLED screen, making it difficult to recommend it over the aforementioned Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 and Moto G31. There are trade-offs to make with any cheap phone, so be sure to read our reviews and our roundup of the best budget phones before making your final choice.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/26/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech Advisor

The Galaxy A13 should be a slam dunk for Samsung. Anyone looking for a budget phone will see the brand, the low price and think it’s a safe bet. But with such poor performance compared to certain rivals, it isn’t. As long as you’re happy to accept that this isn’t going to feel like a fast device and you’re tempted by the good main camera and Samsung OneUI, then at the discounted prices you’ll find from retailers, it’s just about worth buying. But for the Galaxy A13’s RRP, you can get far better performance as well as luxuries such as a 90Hz AMOLED screen, making it difficult to recommend it over the aforementioned Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 and Moto G31. There are trade-offs to make with any cheap phone, so be sure to read our reviews and our roundup of the best budget phones before making your final choice.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/26/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Expert Reviews

The previous Galaxy A12 has been kicking around for a while now, and it’s certainly a bit outdated by modern standards. It didn’t initially receive a recommendation in our review, but with 2022 updates to the cameras, design and software, the Galaxy A13 was perfectly positioned to finally make an appearance on our best budget smartphones list. Except Samsung really missed the mark with this one. Its decision to opt for one of the weakest mobile chipsets we’ve tested in quite some time is a baffling one, and the lack of 5G connectivity is a glaring omission as well. Neither the extra ultrawide camera nor the 1080p screen are enough of an incentive to mask the fact that we’re getting the short end of the stick. It might be dirt cheap, but don’t let Samsung fool you – you can do better for the price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/13/2022
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Expert Reviews

The previous Galaxy A12 has been kicking around for a while now, and it’s certainly a bit outdated by modern standards. It didn’t initially receive a recommendation in our review, but with 2022 updates to the cameras, design and software, the Galaxy A13 was perfectly positioned to finally make an appearance on our best budget smartphones list. Except Samsung really missed the mark with this one. Its decision to opt for one of the weakest mobile chipsets we’ve tested in quite some time is a baffling one, and the lack of 5G connectivity is a glaring omission as well. Neither the extra ultrawide camera nor the 1080p screen are enough of an incentive to mask the fact that we’re getting the short end of the stick. It might be dirt cheap, but don’t let Samsung fool you – you can do better for the price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/13/2022
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: GSM Arena

There is a lot that can go wrong when creating a phone, especially a budget one. The trouble is that most of these devices look very similar on paper. You have to spend some time with them to uncover any issues hidden beneath the surfaces and unfortunately we located a few pretty major ones on the Galaxy A13. It's a real shame since the Galaxy A13 still delivers in other key aspects. It has stellar battery life, and its cameras, while not exactly impressive, benefit from mature processing and deliver decent results. We just can't recommend the Galaxy A13, especially since Samsung itself has other better and more well-rounded Galaxy devices in the same price range to get instead.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/08/2022
Rating: Total score: 54%
Source: GSM Arena

There is a lot that can go wrong when creating a phone, especially a budget one. The trouble is that most of these devices look very similar on paper. You have to spend some time with them to uncover any issues hidden beneath the surfaces and unfortunately we located a few pretty major ones on the Galaxy A13. It's a real shame since the Galaxy A13 still delivers in other key aspects. It has stellar battery life, and its cameras, while not exactly impressive, benefit from mature processing and deliver decent results. We just can't recommend the Galaxy A13, especially since Samsung itself has other better and more well-rounded Galaxy devices in the same price range to get instead.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/08/2022
Rating: Total score: 54%
Source: Unbox

The Samsung Galaxy A12 is the best-selling Android smartphone for 2021, and the Galaxy A13 does have big shoes to fill in various markets including the Philippines. It’s more expensive than its predecessor, but the Galaxy A13 does get a slew of upgrades–including a design makeover–to shape itself as a promising contender in the already-saturated budget segment.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Unbox

The Samsung Galaxy A12 is the best-selling Android smartphone for 2021, and the Galaxy A13 does have big shoes to fill in various markets including the Philippines. It’s more expensive than its predecessor, but the Galaxy A13 does get a slew of upgrades–including a design makeover–to shape itself as a promising contender in the already-saturated budget segment.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Basic Tutorials

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/03/2022
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Basic Tutorials

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/03/2022
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Canaltech

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/26/2022
Source: Canaltech

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/26/2022
Source: Les Numeriques

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/13/2022
Rating: Total score: 60% display: 60% mobility: 100% workmanship: 40% ergonomy: 40%
Source: Les Numeriques

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/13/2022
Rating: Total score: 60% display: 60% mobility: 100% workmanship: 40% ergonomy: 40%
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2022
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/22/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/22/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/15/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/15/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/13/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/13/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/05/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/05/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 04/01/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 04/01/2022
Source: Genk

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/31/2022
Source: Genk

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/31/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/29/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/29/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2022
Source: Cell Phones

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Cell Phones

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Jagat Review

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/29/2022
Source: Jagat Review

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/29/2022
Source: M3 PC för alla

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/03/2022
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: M3 PC för alla

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/03/2022
Rating: Total score: 50%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Specifications

Processor: Samsung Exynos Exynos 1280
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G68 MP4
Display: 6.50 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.189kg
Price: 449 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
三星Galaxy A53 5G建立在一个最畅销的系列上,采用了全新的SoC和更强大的电池。然而,在其他方面没有任何变化,例如相机。我们的审查将揭示Galaxy A53是否还能得到我们的推荐。
Foreign Reviews
Source: Gadgets Now

Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is a pretty good buy at a starting price of Rs 34,499. The smartphone feels good to hold and looks decent. Although one may find it similar to its predecessor, Samsung Galaxy A52, it does offer significant updates when it comes to processor and battery. With impressive battery life, smooth functionality and premium design, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G delivers reliable performance. The smartphone is a good option for anyone who is looking to buy a premium smartphone in the Rs 35,000 segment.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/09/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gadgets Now

Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is a pretty good buy at a starting price of Rs 34,499. The smartphone feels good to hold and looks decent. Although one may find it similar to its predecessor, Samsung Galaxy A52, it does offer significant updates when it comes to processor and battery. With impressive battery life, smooth functionality and premium design, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G delivers reliable performance. The smartphone is a good option for anyone who is looking to buy a premium smartphone in the Rs 35,000 segment.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/09/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phone Arena

Initially, I thought that the Galaxy A53 5G would be too small of an upgrade over the A52 5G, however, when I put all the improvements that Samsung has managed to muster up, I can't say that's the case. More battery life is always a good thing to have, and the A53 5G has a better one than the already good A52 5G from last year. The display and audio quality are an impressive wombo combo, adding a lot to the phone's value and making it a great device for enjoying lots of media. Downsides like the bad haptics can easily be overlooked, but when it comes to the A52's gaming performance, now that's a different story. Maybe with a few updates, Samsung will be able to utilize the Exynos 1280 in a better way, but as it stands right now, it is a bit of a letdown, and playing games is just okay. The camera system, on the other hand, seems to have benefited a lot from the new chip and both photos and video seem more polished in more ways than one, despite the camera-specific hardware remaining the same. Long story short, the Galaxy A53 5G is a solid all-rounder, even more than its predecessor.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2022
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Phone Arena

Initially, I thought that the Galaxy A53 5G would be too small of an upgrade over the A52 5G, however, when I put all the improvements that Samsung has managed to muster up, I can't say that's the case. More battery life is always a good thing to have, and the A53 5G has a better one than the already good A52 5G from last year. The display and audio quality are an impressive wombo combo, adding a lot to the phone's value and making it a great device for enjoying lots of media. Downsides like the bad haptics can easily be overlooked, but when it comes to the A52's gaming performance, now that's a different story. Maybe with a few updates, Samsung will be able to utilize the Exynos 1280 in a better way, but as it stands right now, it is a bit of a letdown, and playing games is just okay. The camera system, on the other hand, seems to have benefited a lot from the new chip and both photos and video seem more polished in more ways than one, despite the camera-specific hardware remaining the same. Long story short, the Galaxy A53 5G is a solid all-rounder, even more than its predecessor.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2022
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Zdnet.com

When I saw the announcement for the Galaxy A53, I did not get that excited since I did not expect a sub-$450 Samsung phone was worth considering. After a few weeks of using the phone, I now question why I'm spending twice the price, and more, for the latest flagships. Granted, photo quality is better with the high-end flagships, but I'm just capturing and sharing photos with family and friends as an amateur. I have limited photo skills and am not going to win any photo contests, so I don't really care about having the ultimate shooter in my hand. While the display's high refresh rate is fantastic, I do see a bit of lag in content appearing on the display and when switching apps from time to time. It really only bothers me if I jump over to a flagship and can see the differences, but for the low $450 price, it is clearly an acceptable compromise and one that the majority of owners are unlikely to notice. One function that bothers me on my iPhone 13 Pro Max is that I have to stand 20 feet away from someone to get a good portrait shot outside.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/07/2022
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Zdnet.com

When I saw the announcement for the Galaxy A53, I did not get that excited since I did not expect a sub-$450 Samsung phone was worth considering. After a few weeks of using the phone, I now question why I'm spending twice the price, and more, for the latest flagships. Granted, photo quality is better with the high-end flagships, but I'm just capturing and sharing photos with family and friends as an amateur. I have limited photo skills and am not going to win any photo contests, so I don't really care about having the ultimate shooter in my hand. While the display's high refresh rate is fantastic, I do see a bit of lag in content appearing on the display and when switching apps from time to time. It really only bothers me if I jump over to a flagship and can see the differences, but for the low $450 price, it is clearly an acceptable compromise and one that the majority of owners are unlikely to notice. One function that bothers me on my iPhone 13 Pro Max is that I have to stand 20 feet away from someone to get a good portrait shot outside.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/07/2022
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Expert Reviews

The Galaxy A53 5G is a remarkably well-rounded rival to this year’s high-priced flagships. If your sights are set on the Galaxy S22 but you don’t have the funds to buy one, then the A53 5G is every bit the next best thing. It simply brings so much to the table that I’d be mad not to give the Galaxy A53 5G a Best Buy award. It’s not perfect but, at this price, nothing ever is and, besides, it gets pretty darn close.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/06/2022
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Expert Reviews

The Galaxy A53 5G is a remarkably well-rounded rival to this year’s high-priced flagships. If your sights are set on the Galaxy S22 but you don’t have the funds to buy one, then the A53 5G is every bit the next best thing. It simply brings so much to the table that I’d be mad not to give the Galaxy A53 5G a Best Buy award. It’s not perfect but, at this price, nothing ever is and, besides, it gets pretty darn close.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/06/2022
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Android Headlines

In a lot of ways, the Galaxy A53 5G is the next best thing if you can’t afford a Galaxy S phone. It’s a mid-ranger through and through, but it punches above its weight in some areas. You won’t find many phones with as good of a media consumption experience as this phone’s with its beautiful display and amazing speakers.The camera isn’t flagship tier, but it gets the job done with good flair. You’ll be able to take some nice pictures that will look good on social media. The only letdown in my experience has been the performance. This phone is going to lag at points in your usage, and you won’t be able to play the most graphics-intensive games. At the end of the day, I recommend picking up this phone if you enjoy consuming content and you want the latest and greatest software from Samsung.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/02/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Headlines

In a lot of ways, the Galaxy A53 5G is the next best thing if you can’t afford a Galaxy S phone. It’s a mid-ranger through and through, but it punches above its weight in some areas. You won’t find many phones with as good of a media consumption experience as this phone’s with its beautiful display and amazing speakers.The camera isn’t flagship tier, but it gets the job done with good flair. You’ll be able to take some nice pictures that will look good on social media. The only letdown in my experience has been the performance. This phone is going to lag at points in your usage, and you won’t be able to play the most graphics-intensive games. At the end of the day, I recommend picking up this phone if you enjoy consuming content and you want the latest and greatest software from Samsung.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/02/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G hits all the important spec points, with a great design and display. There's no shortage of mid-range phones that provide a similar experience for less - and this is no big jump from the A52 - but there are still some very good reasons to choose the A53.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/26/2022
Source: Pocket Lint

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G hits all the important spec points, with a great design and display. There's no shortage of mid-range phones that provide a similar experience for less - and this is no big jump from the A52 - but there are still some very good reasons to choose the A53.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/26/2022
Source: T3

If you’re totally snap-happy and you want an affordable new phone, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G will be a great choice. It’s one of the best cheap phones for point-and-shoot photography, you'll be hard-pushed to find any others with such an accomplished camera system below $500 / £400. Granted there are some downsides. The most damning is its performance, it lacks power which will be frustrating for those who spend a lot of time flicking through their phone. You might also struggle with the slow charge times and the lack of wireless charging. But if those are things you can look past then it will be worth it, especially if you already own other Samsung Galaxy devices. To sum things up, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G has a great screen, a killer camera, easy-to-use software, incredible battery life and it’s all packed into an up-to-date phone that looks the part as well. It’d be hard not to recommend to anyone on a budget. The only reason I would tell you not to buy this is if you already own the A52 because it’s not different enough to justify the upgrade.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/20/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: T3

If you’re totally snap-happy and you want an affordable new phone, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G will be a great choice. It’s one of the best cheap phones for point-and-shoot photography, you'll be hard-pushed to find any others with such an accomplished camera system below $500 / £400. Granted there are some downsides. The most damning is its performance, it lacks power which will be frustrating for those who spend a lot of time flicking through their phone. You might also struggle with the slow charge times and the lack of wireless charging. But if those are things you can look past then it will be worth it, especially if you already own other Samsung Galaxy devices. To sum things up, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G has a great screen, a killer camera, easy-to-use software, incredible battery life and it’s all packed into an up-to-date phone that looks the part as well. It’d be hard not to recommend to anyone on a budget. The only reason I would tell you not to buy this is if you already own the A52 because it’s not different enough to justify the upgrade.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/20/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Engadget

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/18/2022
Source: Engadget

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/18/2022
Source: Engadget

At $450, the A53 costs $50 less than the A52 5G. That may seem like a bonus, but Samsung doesn’t ship the phone with a wall charger anymore and it hasn’t added wireless charging. The company’s 25W power adapter costs an extra $20. In addition to the Galaxy Buds Live promotion I mentioned earlier, the company is currently offering up to $100 off the A53 if you trade in your existing device. Had Samsung done more to future-proof the A53, it would be easier for me to recommend. But with a middling chipset and a camera that feels stuck in the past, you’re better off spending your money on a phone that you’ll be happy with for years to come.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/18/2022
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Engadget

At $450, the A53 costs $50 less than the A52 5G. That may seem like a bonus, but Samsung doesn’t ship the phone with a wall charger anymore and it hasn’t added wireless charging. The company’s 25W power adapter costs an extra $20. In addition to the Galaxy Buds Live promotion I mentioned earlier, the company is currently offering up to $100 off the A53 if you trade in your existing device. Had Samsung done more to future-proof the A53, it would be easier for me to recommend. But with a middling chipset and a camera that feels stuck in the past, you’re better off spending your money on a phone that you’ll be happy with for years to come.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/18/2022
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Tech Nave

The Samsung Galaxy A53 smartphone comes with 5G support at an expected price of $380 (Rs 28,000 in India) approx. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G carries a 6.5 inches Super AMOLED display panel with a 120Hz refresh rate support. This FHD screen is protected by the Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection. For software, you get the latest Android 12 OS with One UI 4.1 user interface. Besides this, the handset provides 4GB/6GB/8GB RAM support with 128GB/256GB internal storage with a microSDXC card slot. As far as the cameras are concerned, the Galaxy A53 equips a rear Quad camera setup featuring a 64MP primary camera, 12MP ultrawide, 5MP macro, and 5MP depth lens. You get various modes and filters in the camera module. Apart from this, you will also receive a 32MP selfie camera lens at the front, and with this setup, you can record 4K videos at 30fps. Furthermore, the phone carries a 5nm Exynos 1280 chipset that reaches up to a 2.4GHz clocking speed. The smartphone has provided a Li-Po 5000 mAh battery with a 25W fast charging support.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/15/2022
Source: Tech Nave

The Samsung Galaxy A53 smartphone comes with 5G support at an expected price of $380 (Rs 28,000 in India) approx. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G carries a 6.5 inches Super AMOLED display panel with a 120Hz refresh rate support. This FHD screen is protected by the Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection. For software, you get the latest Android 12 OS with One UI 4.1 user interface. Besides this, the handset provides 4GB/6GB/8GB RAM support with 128GB/256GB internal storage with a microSDXC card slot. As far as the cameras are concerned, the Galaxy A53 equips a rear Quad camera setup featuring a 64MP primary camera, 12MP ultrawide, 5MP macro, and 5MP depth lens. You get various modes and filters in the camera module. Apart from this, you will also receive a 32MP selfie camera lens at the front, and with this setup, you can record 4K videos at 30fps. Furthermore, the phone carries a 5nm Exynos 1280 chipset that reaches up to a 2.4GHz clocking speed. The smartphone has provided a Li-Po 5000 mAh battery with a 25W fast charging support.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/15/2022
Source: PC Mag

The Galaxy A53 5G is at an odd spot in the phone market. There simply aren't a lot of $450 phones in the US, because most Americans either opt to pay for a high-end model on a monthly payment plan, or purchase a cheaper one upfront. At the $450 price point, the Google Pixel 5a 5G dominates, and the A53 doesn't have much new to bring to the conversation. We like its premium design, colorful screen, and flexible imaging options, but if you're on a payment plan, it's worth stepping up to more expensive Android phones such as the Galaxy S21 FE or the Pixel 6. And although the upcoming OnePlus Nord N20 and the Galaxy A33 probably won’t include specs that match the A53, they might be inexpensive enough that you can avoid a long-term contract with your carrier. Finally, despite its smaller screen and lack of a camera night mode, Apple’s affordable iPhone SE is also worth your attention thanks to its impressive hardware performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/13/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: PC Mag

The Galaxy A53 5G is at an odd spot in the phone market. There simply aren't a lot of $450 phones in the US, because most Americans either opt to pay for a high-end model on a monthly payment plan, or purchase a cheaper one upfront. At the $450 price point, the Google Pixel 5a 5G dominates, and the A53 doesn't have much new to bring to the conversation. We like its premium design, colorful screen, and flexible imaging options, but if you're on a payment plan, it's worth stepping up to more expensive Android phones such as the Galaxy S21 FE or the Pixel 6. And although the upcoming OnePlus Nord N20 and the Galaxy A33 probably won’t include specs that match the A53, they might be inexpensive enough that you can avoid a long-term contract with your carrier. Finally, despite its smaller screen and lack of a camera night mode, Apple’s affordable iPhone SE is also worth your attention thanks to its impressive hardware performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/13/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tom's Guide

The Galaxy A53 is a great phone for $449. It outperforms the Pixel 5a in benchmarks and even goes a decent while on a charge. The 120Hz display is really nice, especially at this price. I wish it was an adaptive refresh rate, but not even the more expensive Galaxy S21 FE sports one of those. The looming threat on the horizon is the Pixel 6a, which might be right around the corner. Rumors say that handset will use the same Tensor chip that’s in the Pixel 6. If true, the 6a is going to be a force to be reckoned with, and the Galaxy A53 may not be able to weather that storm. We’ll have to see. But right now, I’m confident in saying that the Galaxy A53 is the best cheap Android phone. The iPhone SE (2022) is more powerful, but the A53 has the bigger and brighter display (plus a higher refresh rate). The ultrawide camera and dedicated night mode also go a long way to making the case for the Galaxy A53.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/13/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide

The Galaxy A53 is a great phone for $449. It outperforms the Pixel 5a in benchmarks and even goes a decent while on a charge. The 120Hz display is really nice, especially at this price. I wish it was an adaptive refresh rate, but not even the more expensive Galaxy S21 FE sports one of those. The looming threat on the horizon is the Pixel 6a, which might be right around the corner. Rumors say that handset will use the same Tensor chip that’s in the Pixel 6. If true, the 6a is going to be a force to be reckoned with, and the Galaxy A53 may not be able to weather that storm. We’ll have to see. But right now, I’m confident in saying that the Galaxy A53 is the best cheap Android phone. The iPhone SE (2022) is more powerful, but the A53 has the bigger and brighter display (plus a higher refresh rate). The ultrawide camera and dedicated night mode also go a long way to making the case for the Galaxy A53.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/13/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Authority

The Galaxy A53 5G doesn’t reinvent the wheel, but it doesn’t have to. Instead, Samsung refined the already impressive Galaxy A52 5G and lowered its asking price by $50. The lower price ends up being the cherry on top because the overall package is one of the most impressive you’ll find for under $500. If you already have a Galaxy A52 5G, there’s not enough new here to consider an upgrade, but if you’ve been looking for a reasonably priced way to enter the Samsung ecosystem, the Galaxy A53 5G is an excellent gateway. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is an excellent indicator of where the budget phone market is headed. It offers a well-rounded experience that should suit the needs of most users and a price tag that won’t make your wallet hurt too badly. Add in Samsung’s excellent update commitment, and you’ve got an affordable device that’ll stay current long after others have retired.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Authority

The Galaxy A53 5G doesn’t reinvent the wheel, but it doesn’t have to. Instead, Samsung refined the already impressive Galaxy A52 5G and lowered its asking price by $50. The lower price ends up being the cherry on top because the overall package is one of the most impressive you’ll find for under $500. If you already have a Galaxy A52 5G, there’s not enough new here to consider an upgrade, but if you’ve been looking for a reasonably priced way to enter the Samsung ecosystem, the Galaxy A53 5G is an excellent gateway. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is an excellent indicator of where the budget phone market is headed. It offers a well-rounded experience that should suit the needs of most users and a price tag that won’t make your wallet hurt too badly. Add in Samsung’s excellent update commitment, and you’ve got an affordable device that’ll stay current long after others have retired.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: GSM Arena

The Galaxy A series has been Samsung's best-selling line for quite some time now. That's no coincidence since the "A family" went through a transformative period a while back and has been laser-focused on consistently delivering great value across the midrange and budget segments. Unfortunately, that focus seems to be blurring a bit lately. We didn't particularly like the Galaxy A13, which we reviewed not long ago, and now the Galaxy A53 5G underdelivered as well. Taking all of this into account, we just can't bring ourselves to outright recommend anybody go out and deliberately seek an A53s 5G. Again, at the risk of repeating ourselves, it's a solid and well-rounded Samsung that won't disappoint in any major way if you happen to get one through a great deal, on contract or as a company unit. If it's your money on the line, though, you are much better off getting last year's Galaxy A52s 5G or perhaps the Galaxy S20 FE 5G instead.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GSM Arena

The Galaxy A series has been Samsung's best-selling line for quite some time now. That's no coincidence since the "A family" went through a transformative period a while back and has been laser-focused on consistently delivering great value across the midrange and budget segments. Unfortunately, that focus seems to be blurring a bit lately. We didn't particularly like the Galaxy A13, which we reviewed not long ago, and now the Galaxy A53 5G underdelivered as well. Taking all of this into account, we just can't bring ourselves to outright recommend anybody go out and deliberately seek an A53s 5G. Again, at the risk of repeating ourselves, it's a solid and well-rounded Samsung that won't disappoint in any major way if you happen to get one through a great deal, on contract or as a company unit. If it's your money on the line, though, you are much better off getting last year's Galaxy A52s 5G or perhaps the Galaxy S20 FE 5G instead.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: The Mobile Indian

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G has great cameras, battery life and a good display. It is supposed to be an all-rounder but as compared to completion it is found wanting. We are of the opinion iQOO 9 SE has an edge over A53 5G in terms of value for money tag. The mid-range segment is flooded with a bunch of options from various OEMs and currently, we feel that the bar has been set by the iQOO 9 SE at Rs 33,990. For Rs 34,999, Samsung is now offering you the 6/128 model of its newest Galaxy A53 5G and at Rs 35,999, you can get the top-of-the-line 8/128 model. However, does it seem worth in front of competitors such as Realme GT Neo 2, iQOO 9 SE, etc? Let’s take a look.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/12/2022
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 65% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 65%
Source: The Mobile Indian

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G has great cameras, battery life and a good display. It is supposed to be an all-rounder but as compared to completion it is found wanting. We are of the opinion iQOO 9 SE has an edge over A53 5G in terms of value for money tag. The mid-range segment is flooded with a bunch of options from various OEMs and currently, we feel that the bar has been set by the iQOO 9 SE at Rs 33,990. For Rs 34,999, Samsung is now offering you the 6/128 model of its newest Galaxy A53 5G and at Rs 35,999, you can get the top-of-the-line 8/128 model. However, does it seem worth in front of competitors such as Realme GT Neo 2, iQOO 9 SE, etc? Let’s take a look.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/12/2022
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 65% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 65%
Source: NDTV Gadgets

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is a capable premium smartphone but falls short compared in terms of raw performance. This is mainly due to the new SoC, which seems as though it would be a good enough fit for the budget Galaxy M33 5G (Rs. 18,999), but not for a phone that costs Rs. 35,000. Daylight camera performance is quite good, and this is the only phone we've reviewed in this segment with an IP67 rating. Unfortunately for the Galaxy A53 5G, the Galaxy A52s 5G (Review), its predecessor, offers better gaming performance, has a headphone jack, and comes with a charger in the box. It also costs a bit less (around Rs. 32,499) which makes it the better buy. As for competition from other manufacturers, the iQoo 9 SE (starting at Rs. 33,990) is the Galaxy A53 5G's biggest potential competitor. We are yet to review this phone, but it has a better Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SoC and you get a 66W charger in the box. The base variant also has 8GB of RAM, so even just going by specifications, it poses a threat.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/11/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: NDTV Gadgets

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is a capable premium smartphone but falls short compared in terms of raw performance. This is mainly due to the new SoC, which seems as though it would be a good enough fit for the budget Galaxy M33 5G (Rs. 18,999), but not for a phone that costs Rs. 35,000. Daylight camera performance is quite good, and this is the only phone we've reviewed in this segment with an IP67 rating. Unfortunately for the Galaxy A53 5G, the Galaxy A52s 5G (Review), its predecessor, offers better gaming performance, has a headphone jack, and comes with a charger in the box. It also costs a bit less (around Rs. 32,499) which makes it the better buy. As for competition from other manufacturers, the iQoo 9 SE (starting at Rs. 33,990) is the Galaxy A53 5G's biggest potential competitor. We are yet to review this phone, but it has a better Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SoC and you get a 66W charger in the box. The base variant also has 8GB of RAM, so even just going by specifications, it poses a threat.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/11/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Police

I'd look at other options first. At $450, the Galaxy A53 offers a great display and snappy performance (typically) — plus legendary software support. Samsung's committed to four years of OS updates and five years of security patches. That's as good as you'll find on any Android phone right now, and it makes the Pixel 5a — which launched last year and is slated to stop getting updates in summer 2024 — look foolish. It's actually longer support than Google is offering even with its Pixel 6 series. But with inconsistent camera performance and year-over-year downgrades like the removal of the headphone jack and bundled charger, the A53 isn't the easy win the A52 was, even if it is 50 bucks cheaper. At the very least, wait and see what the Pixel 6a is all about — we could know as soon as Google I/O.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/10/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Police

I'd look at other options first. At $450, the Galaxy A53 offers a great display and snappy performance (typically) — plus legendary software support. Samsung's committed to four years of OS updates and five years of security patches. That's as good as you'll find on any Android phone right now, and it makes the Pixel 5a — which launched last year and is slated to stop getting updates in summer 2024 — look foolish. It's actually longer support than Google is offering even with its Pixel 6 series. But with inconsistent camera performance and year-over-year downgrades like the removal of the headphone jack and bundled charger, the A53 isn't the easy win the A52 was, even if it is 50 bucks cheaper. At the very least, wait and see what the Pixel 6a is all about — we could know as soon as Google I/O.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/10/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: CNet

Overall, the Galaxy A53 5G has a lot to offer for the price, with the right balance of features for most people. If you just want a phone for basic tasks like reading the news, taking casual photos of your pets for Instagram and video chatting over Zoom, the Galaxy A53 5G will do just fine.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/09/2022
Source: CNet

Overall, the Galaxy A53 5G has a lot to offer for the price, with the right balance of features for most people. If you just want a phone for basic tasks like reading the news, taking casual photos of your pets for Instagram and video chatting over Zoom, the Galaxy A53 5G will do just fine.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/09/2022
Source: CNet

The $449 Pixel 5A with 5G also gives Samsung a healthy run for its money. That phone has a nearly borderless screen, an ultrawide camera, night mode photography, a headphone jack and a Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G processor with solid performance. Plus, Google typically brings exclusive features to its own Pixel devices before launching them for other Android phones. But it's missing some other perks you'd get with the Galaxy A53 5G, like an in-screen fingerprint scanner (the Pixel's sensor is on the back), a 120Hz refresh rate for its display, expandable storage and an extra year of Android OS upgrades. Overall, the Galaxy A53 5G has a lot to offer for the price, with the right balance of features for most people. If you just want a phone for basic tasks like reading the news, taking casual photos of your pets for Instagram and video chatting over Zoom, the Galaxy A53 5G will do just fine.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/09/2022
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: CNet

The $449 Pixel 5A with 5G also gives Samsung a healthy run for its money. That phone has a nearly borderless screen, an ultrawide camera, night mode photography, a headphone jack and a Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G processor with solid performance. Plus, Google typically brings exclusive features to its own Pixel devices before launching them for other Android phones. But it's missing some other perks you'd get with the Galaxy A53 5G, like an in-screen fingerprint scanner (the Pixel's sensor is on the back), a 120Hz refresh rate for its display, expandable storage and an extra year of Android OS upgrades. Overall, the Galaxy A53 5G has a lot to offer for the price, with the right balance of features for most people. If you just want a phone for basic tasks like reading the news, taking casual photos of your pets for Instagram and video chatting over Zoom, the Galaxy A53 5G will do just fine.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/09/2022
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: The Verge

The Galaxy A53 5G is an easy pick if you live in the US and you’re looking to spend less than $500 on an Android phone. The Google Pixel 5A is basically the phone’s only competition, but it’s likely to be replaced soon and has a shorter shelf life at this point with only a couple more OS updates headed to it. You’d get a better camera and better software without all of the Samsung duplicates, but it’s not sold through any carriers if you’re looking to subsidize it with your wireless plan. Aside from waiting for the Google Pixel 6A, the other option would be to spend more and go for the Pixel 6. Google seems to have addressed some early bugs with Android 12 security patches, and for $599, it’s a fantastic device with an excellent camera and lovely software. But it’s significantly more expensive — an extra $150. If you’re not picky about getting the very best image quality and you like (or at least don’t mind) Samsung’s version of Android 12, then there really isn’t a compelling case for spending the extra money.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/08/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: The Verge

The Galaxy A53 5G is an easy pick if you live in the US and you’re looking to spend less than $500 on an Android phone. The Google Pixel 5A is basically the phone’s only competition, but it’s likely to be replaced soon and has a shorter shelf life at this point with only a couple more OS updates headed to it. You’d get a better camera and better software without all of the Samsung duplicates, but it’s not sold through any carriers if you’re looking to subsidize it with your wireless plan. Aside from waiting for the Google Pixel 6A, the other option would be to spend more and go for the Pixel 6. Google seems to have addressed some early bugs with Android 12 security patches, and for $599, it’s a fantastic device with an excellent camera and lovely software. But it’s significantly more expensive — an extra $150. If you’re not picky about getting the very best image quality and you like (or at least don’t mind) Samsung’s version of Android 12, then there really isn’t a compelling case for spending the extra money.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/08/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Think Digit

The Galaxy A53 is everything we expect of a Samsung mid-range phone. The experience is quite pacifying, mostly thanks to the palatable software and good-quality display, but it’s also let down by a mediocre chipset. If you are into gaming, phones like the OnePlus 9R, OnePlus Nord 2, iQOO 9 SE or perhaps even Galaxy A52s should offer better value. The Galaxy A53 is an allrounder with a lot to look forward to. It has an appealing design, offers decent camera performance for the price, and assures a reliable battery backup. At the same time, the mid-range Exynos chip hampers the experience. The lack of a charging adaptor in the box and slow charging speeds are other peeve points.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2022
Rating: Total score: 67% price: 67% performance: 64% workmanship: 65%
Source: Think Digit

The Galaxy A53 is everything we expect of a Samsung mid-range phone. The experience is quite pacifying, mostly thanks to the palatable software and good-quality display, but it’s also let down by a mediocre chipset. If you are into gaming, phones like the OnePlus 9R, OnePlus Nord 2, iQOO 9 SE or perhaps even Galaxy A52s should offer better value. The Galaxy A53 is an allrounder with a lot to look forward to. It has an appealing design, offers decent camera performance for the price, and assures a reliable battery backup. At the same time, the mid-range Exynos chip hampers the experience. The lack of a charging adaptor in the box and slow charging speeds are other peeve points.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2022
Rating: Total score: 67% price: 67% performance: 64% workmanship: 65%
Source: NLT

So, at the end of the day, the Galaxy A53 5G is still a solid phone to get today. It’s a great all-rounder mid-range smartphone that has good performance for day-to-day use with some gaming on the side, good battery life, excellent software – and excellent software support as well. The price though, I am still rather salty at that extreme price hike over the Galaxy A52. At RM1,849 – I just think it’s rather steep. If you have that budget to spend for a phone like this, then go on ahead. The Galaxy A53 5G is a solid phone overall. However, if you’re looking for an even better deal, then maybe take a look at the Galaxy A52s 5G from late last year. It doesn’t have that extensive software support, but you can get it for less than RM1,500 through retailers now. That is a much better deal, in my opinion.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2022
Source: NLT

So, at the end of the day, the Galaxy A53 5G is still a solid phone to get today. It’s a great all-rounder mid-range smartphone that has good performance for day-to-day use with some gaming on the side, good battery life, excellent software – and excellent software support as well. The price though, I am still rather salty at that extreme price hike over the Galaxy A52. At RM1,849 – I just think it’s rather steep. If you have that budget to spend for a phone like this, then go on ahead. The Galaxy A53 5G is a solid phone overall. However, if you’re looking for an even better deal, then maybe take a look at the Galaxy A52s 5G from late last year. It doesn’t have that extensive software support, but you can get it for less than RM1,500 through retailers now. That is a much better deal, in my opinion.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2022
Source: The Indian Express

For many, the Galaxy A53 5G, which starts at Rs 34,499, will be sufficient for their needs. It’s not the best smartphone made by Samsung, but the idea of having a mid-range phone with premium features makes it a lot more capable than rivals. Yes, it misses on certain things, but is just as capable as Samsung’s flagship phones in most regards. If you are the sort of person who prefers a big screen and needs great battery life coupled with fast performance, then look no further.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: The Indian Express

For many, the Galaxy A53 5G, which starts at Rs 34,499, will be sufficient for their needs. It’s not the best smartphone made by Samsung, but the idea of having a mid-range phone with premium features makes it a lot more capable than rivals. Yes, it misses on certain things, but is just as capable as Samsung’s flagship phones in most regards. If you are the sort of person who prefers a big screen and needs great battery life coupled with fast performance, then look no further.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech World

A globális telefonos piacot uraló Samsung kínálatának gerincét képezi az “A” család, amelyben a csúcskategóriás modelleknél kisebb tudású, ám olcsóbb termékeket gyűjtötték össze. Az A53 e vonal egyik legújabb tagja, amelyet nem régen mutattak be, és amely már Magyarországon is megvásárolható. Megnéztük, hogy mit tud és, hogy kinél válhat be.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/04/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech World

A globális telefonos piacot uraló Samsung kínálatának gerincét képezi az “A” család, amelyben a csúcskategóriás modelleknél kisebb tudású, ám olcsóbb termékeket gyűjtötték össze. Az A53 e vonal egyik legújabb tagja, amelyet nem régen mutattak be, és amely már Magyarországon is megvásárolható. Megnéztük, hogy mit tud és, hogy kinél válhat be.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/04/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Central

The Galaxy A53 5G is faster than its predecessor, has a larger battery, takes better photos, and will get more software updates than any other mid-range phone. It doesn't have a 3.5mm jack or a charger in the box, but the upside is that it costs $450 — $50 less than the A52. This is the mid-range phone to beat right now.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/28/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Central

The Galaxy A53 5G is faster than its predecessor, has a larger battery, takes better photos, and will get more software updates than any other mid-range phone. It doesn't have a 3.5mm jack or a charger in the box, but the upside is that it costs $450 — $50 less than the A52. This is the mid-range phone to beat right now.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/28/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mobygyaan

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G equips a stunning 120 Hz Super AMOLED display, packs a 5nm Exynos 1280 octa-core processor that performs well, the camera performance is impressive, supports hardware OIS, and comes with an IP67 water-resistant design. Other features include Android 12 out-of-the-box, stereo speakers, 5G support, and its sleek Ambient Edge design. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is an overall reasonable option for those who are looking for a smartphone (especially non-Chinese) with such features in the price range of ₹30,000 to ₹35,000. You can grab exciting discounts of flat ₹3,000 off on ICICI Credit Cards on pre-orders as well as up to ₹2,000 off via the Samsung Shop App.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2022
Source: Mobygyaan

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G equips a stunning 120 Hz Super AMOLED display, packs a 5nm Exynos 1280 octa-core processor that performs well, the camera performance is impressive, supports hardware OIS, and comes with an IP67 water-resistant design. Other features include Android 12 out-of-the-box, stereo speakers, 5G support, and its sleek Ambient Edge design. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is an overall reasonable option for those who are looking for a smartphone (especially non-Chinese) with such features in the price range of ₹30,000 to ₹35,000. You can grab exciting discounts of flat ₹3,000 off on ICICI Credit Cards on pre-orders as well as up to ₹2,000 off via the Samsung Shop App.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2022
Source: NDTV Gadgets

The cameras on the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G remain seemingly unchanged over what you get with the Galaxy A52s 5G. There's a 64-megapixel primary camera with optical stabilisation (OIS), a 12-megapixel ultra-wide-angle camera with a 123-degree field of view, a 5-megapixel macro camera, and a 5-megapixel depth camera. A 32-megapixel camera on the front takes care of selfies. One of the main changes with the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G over its predecessor is Samsung's switch to an Exynos SoC. This smartphone uses a new Exynos 1280 SoC which is also expected to show up in other Samsung smartphones this year. The previous Samsung Galaxy A52 and Galaxy A52s 5G had Qualcomm-powered SoCs, so it will be interesting to see how the Exynos one compares. This will also be one of the factors that decides the Galaxy A53 5G's overall value, keeping in mind its premium price tag. So, stay tuned for our full review, which will be out soon.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/28/2022
Source: NDTV Gadgets

The cameras on the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G remain seemingly unchanged over what you get with the Galaxy A52s 5G. There's a 64-megapixel primary camera with optical stabilisation (OIS), a 12-megapixel ultra-wide-angle camera with a 123-degree field of view, a 5-megapixel macro camera, and a 5-megapixel depth camera. A 32-megapixel camera on the front takes care of selfies. One of the main changes with the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G over its predecessor is Samsung's switch to an Exynos SoC. This smartphone uses a new Exynos 1280 SoC which is also expected to show up in other Samsung smartphones this year. The previous Samsung Galaxy A52 and Galaxy A52s 5G had Qualcomm-powered SoCs, so it will be interesting to see how the Exynos one compares. This will also be one of the factors that decides the Galaxy A53 5G's overall value, keeping in mind its premium price tag. So, stay tuned for our full review, which will be out soon.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/28/2022
Source: Sam Mobile

Will Samsung fix that with software updates? Can Samsung fix that with software updates? I don’t know, but as it stands, I don’t think I can recommend buying the Galaxy A53 5G if a phone that performs well in day-to-day use is what you’re looking for. The Galaxy A52s is the better choice in that case, even if it’s a little old and won’t get four years of OS upgrades (it won’t go past Android 14 vs Android 16 on the A53). But if you do want to take the plunge, the Galaxy A53 5G does have a lot going for it. The display’s great, the stereo speakers are nice, battery life is long-lasting, the cameras take great pictures in all sorts of conditions, and while the design uses too much plastic, the A53 is still a looker and is certified for excellent water and dust resistance. And again, a promise of updates till Android 16? That’s just unbeatable and makes the Galaxy A53 5G stand out from the crowd (a crowd that’s got both Samsung and non-Samsung phones in it). I just hope the performance issues are fixed soon, because everything else about this phone is impressive for the asking price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/28/2022
Source: Sam Mobile

Will Samsung fix that with software updates? Can Samsung fix that with software updates? I don’t know, but as it stands, I don’t think I can recommend buying the Galaxy A53 5G if a phone that performs well in day-to-day use is what you’re looking for. The Galaxy A52s is the better choice in that case, even if it’s a little old and won’t get four years of OS upgrades (it won’t go past Android 14 vs Android 16 on the A53). But if you do want to take the plunge, the Galaxy A53 5G does have a lot going for it. The display’s great, the stereo speakers are nice, battery life is long-lasting, the cameras take great pictures in all sorts of conditions, and while the design uses too much plastic, the A53 is still a looker and is certified for excellent water and dust resistance. And again, a promise of updates till Android 16? That’s just unbeatable and makes the Galaxy A53 5G stand out from the crowd (a crowd that’s got both Samsung and non-Samsung phones in it). I just hope the performance issues are fixed soon, because everything else about this phone is impressive for the asking price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/28/2022
Source: TechTablets

Hands-On, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2022
Source: TechTablets

Hands-On, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2022
Source: 91mobiles

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G retails for Rs 34,499 in India and for the price, brings a handful of compelling features to the table. For one, the phone offers a capable set of cameras that can click delightful pictures come night or day. The unit performs well too, and the smartphone’s beefy cell can outlast a user’s longest binge sessions as well. With that said, everything the Galaxy A53 5G can do, the Galaxy A52s 5G does better. What’s more, the market is flush with high-performance devices that’ll be better suited to those who tend to game a lot on their phone as well. Be that as it may, buyers looking for a good-looking mid-ranger that will run the latest version of Android for years to come can bank on the Galaxy A53 5G.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/25/2022
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: 91mobiles

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G retails for Rs 34,499 in India and for the price, brings a handful of compelling features to the table. For one, the phone offers a capable set of cameras that can click delightful pictures come night or day. The unit performs well too, and the smartphone’s beefy cell can outlast a user’s longest binge sessions as well. With that said, everything the Galaxy A53 5G can do, the Galaxy A52s 5G does better. What’s more, the market is flush with high-performance devices that’ll be better suited to those who tend to game a lot on their phone as well. Be that as it may, buyers looking for a good-looking mid-ranger that will run the latest version of Android for years to come can bank on the Galaxy A53 5G.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/25/2022
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Sam Mobile

The Galaxy A53 appears to be a worthy successor to its predecessor. We’ve been impressed by it during the course of our Galaxy A53 hands-on and look forward to testing it in more detail for the full review. Samsung has focused on the quality of improvements this time around, not the quantity. The winning formula that it set with the Galaxy A52 has clearly been perfected. It does appear that the company may have yet another winner on its hands.
Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 03/22/2022
Source: Sam Mobile

The Galaxy A53 appears to be a worthy successor to its predecessor. We’ve been impressed by it during the course of our Galaxy A53 hands-on and look forward to testing it in more detail for the full review. Samsung has focused on the quality of improvements this time around, not the quantity. The winning formula that it set with the Galaxy A52 has clearly been perfected. It does appear that the company may have yet another winner on its hands.
Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 03/22/2022
Source: The Tech Chap

First impressions of the 2022 Samsung Galaxy A53 (& Galaxy A33) - for £399 it's cheaper than the new iPhone SE... could it be the new mid-range killer!?
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/21/2022
Source: The Tech Chap

First impressions of the 2022 Samsung Galaxy A53 (& Galaxy A33) - for £399 it's cheaper than the new iPhone SE... could it be the new mid-range killer!?
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/21/2022
Source: Techradar

The Samsung Galaxy A53 is a feature-packed, mid-range phone which has enough about it to compete in an incredibly crowded section of the market. It may not quite have the best bang-for-buck offering, but Samsung's A series continues to grow in popularity and the A53 is a solid new chapter in the story.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/20/2022
Source: Techradar

The Samsung Galaxy A53 is a feature-packed, mid-range phone which has enough about it to compete in an incredibly crowded section of the market. It may not quite have the best bang-for-buck offering, but Samsung's A series continues to grow in popularity and the A53 is a solid new chapter in the story.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/20/2022
Source: Engadget

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Engadget

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: 9to5google

Sporting similar designs and internals, just what is the difference between the Galaxy A33 5G and Galaxy A53 5G? After spending some time with the duo we have a good idea of the strengths of each handset and which might be the better choice.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: 9to5google

Sporting similar designs and internals, just what is the difference between the Galaxy A33 5G and Galaxy A53 5G? After spending some time with the duo we have a good idea of the strengths of each handset and which might be the better choice.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Trusted Reviews

For the impressive price, the Galaxy A53 5G ticks a lot of boxes. The addition of an adaptive refresh rate and OIS over its predecessor are two welcome features, while the chipset should offer nippy performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Trusted Reviews

For the impressive price, the Galaxy A53 5G ticks a lot of boxes. The addition of an adaptive refresh rate and OIS over its predecessor are two welcome features, while the chipset should offer nippy performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Unbox

Samsung is up for an interesting battle in the mid-range segment in the Philippines with the Galaxy A53. Save for a bump in battery capacity (at the expense of the headphone jack) and a new Exynos processor, Samsung chose to go for the tried-and-tested formula of the Galaxy A52/52S for its latest premium mid-range phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Unbox

Samsung is up for an interesting battle in the mid-range segment in the Philippines with the Galaxy A53. Save for a bump in battery capacity (at the expense of the headphone jack) and a new Exynos processor, Samsung chose to go for the tried-and-tested formula of the Galaxy A52/52S for its latest premium mid-range phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Pocket Lint

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G follows on from a phone that was not just a great seller for Samsung, but a phone we also rated highly. There are some incremental upgrades here which we still have to explore in our full review, but first impressions are good. There's a great design - with waterproofing adding a premium touch - fronted by a high-quality display. New core hardware promises more power, while the main camera should be capable enough. A bigger battery might just seal the deal and deliver a great experience for those who want something slightly more affordable. We will deliver a full and updated verdict on the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G as soon as we can.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Pocket Lint

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G follows on from a phone that was not just a great seller for Samsung, but a phone we also rated highly. There are some incremental upgrades here which we still have to explore in our full review, but first impressions are good. There's a great design - with waterproofing adding a premium touch - fronted by a high-quality display. New core hardware promises more power, while the main camera should be capable enough. A bigger battery might just seal the deal and deliver a great experience for those who want something slightly more affordable. We will deliver a full and updated verdict on the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G as soon as we can.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Expert Reviews

The Galaxy A53 5G is set to be a well-rounded rival to this year’s high-priced flagships. If your sights are set on the Galaxy S22 but you don’t have the funds required to buy one, then there’s a good chance that this year’s A53 5G will be the next best thing. Of course, we’ll find out soon when we receive a handset for review. In the meantime, the Galaxy A53 5G is available from 1 April in the UK at a SIM-free price of £399.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Expert Reviews

The Galaxy A53 5G is set to be a well-rounded rival to this year’s high-priced flagships. If your sights are set on the Galaxy S22 but you don’t have the funds required to buy one, then there’s a good chance that this year’s A53 5G will be the next best thing. Of course, we’ll find out soon when we receive a handset for review. In the meantime, the Galaxy A53 5G is available from 1 April in the UK at a SIM-free price of £399.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Stuff TV

At £379 for the A33 5G and £399 for the A53 5G, we’re impressed both phones cram in so much, and overjoyed we’re not seeing piddly 64GB storage capacities and mediocre screens in midrange Samsung phones anymore. The Galaxy A53 5G, in particular, seems perfect for someone who wants Galaxy S22 experiences without the flagship price. Meanwhile, the A33 5G loses a little more screen to that notch, scales back the refresh rate and reduces the megapixels. That said, pretty much everything else is identical across both phones, from the in-display fingerprint scanners to the IP67 water and dust resistance, through to massive batteries and capable 5nm processors. Expected to launch for pre-order right now, and be available for purchase either at the end of March or the beginning of April 2022, if you’re a Samsung fan in need of a cost-effective upgrade, both these phones should be blipping your radar.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Stuff TV

At £379 for the A33 5G and £399 for the A53 5G, we’re impressed both phones cram in so much, and overjoyed we’re not seeing piddly 64GB storage capacities and mediocre screens in midrange Samsung phones anymore. The Galaxy A53 5G, in particular, seems perfect for someone who wants Galaxy S22 experiences without the flagship price. Meanwhile, the A33 5G loses a little more screen to that notch, scales back the refresh rate and reduces the megapixels. That said, pretty much everything else is identical across both phones, from the in-display fingerprint scanners to the IP67 water and dust resistance, through to massive batteries and capable 5nm processors. Expected to launch for pre-order right now, and be available for purchase either at the end of March or the beginning of April 2022, if you’re a Samsung fan in need of a cost-effective upgrade, both these phones should be blipping your radar.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Phone Arena

At the end of the day, the Galaxy A53 5G is seemingly an incremental improvement over the A52 5G. Despite that, it does manage to bring something new to the table like a significantly better processor, better stereo speakers, and a slightly larger battery. Make sure you come back, to check out our full detailed review of the Galaxy A53 5G, where we will give you a more in-depth look inside what's new and better, compared to the previous models and competitors.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Phone Arena

At the end of the day, the Galaxy A53 5G is seemingly an incremental improvement over the A52 5G. Despite that, it does manage to bring something new to the table like a significantly better processor, better stereo speakers, and a slightly larger battery. Make sure you come back, to check out our full detailed review of the Galaxy A53 5G, where we will give you a more in-depth look inside what's new and better, compared to the previous models and competitors.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/28/2022
Rating: Total score: 77% features: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/28/2022
Rating: Total score: 77% features: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Futurezone.at

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/23/2022
Source: Futurezone.at

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/23/2022
Source: Basic Tutorials

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/11/2022
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Basic Tutorials

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/11/2022
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Nextpit Germany

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Nextpit Germany

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/07/2022
Rating: Total score: 91%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/07/2022
Rating: Total score: 91%
Source: Curved

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/06/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 72% performance: 70% display: 85% mobility: 85%
Source: Curved

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/06/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 72% performance: 70% display: 85% mobility: 85%
Source: A1 Blog

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/04/2022
Source: A1 Blog

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/04/2022
Source: Computerbild

Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 04/22/2022
Rating: Total score: 91%
Source: Computerbild

Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 04/22/2022
Rating: Total score: 91%
Source: Chinahandys.net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/17/2022
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 70% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Chinahandys.net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/17/2022
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 70% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/15/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/15/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/28/2022
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/28/2022
Source: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/24/2022
Rating: Total score: 74% features: 50% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/24/2022
Rating: Total score: 74% features: 50% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Hipertextual

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/15/2022
Source: Hipertextual

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/15/2022
Source: Tuexperto

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/13/2022
Source: Tuexperto

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/13/2022
Source: Xataka

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/12/2022
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 85% display: 88% mobility: 93% workmanship: 83%
Source: Xataka

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/12/2022
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 85% display: 88% mobility: 93% workmanship: 83%
Source: Xataka

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/18/2022
Source: Xataka

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/18/2022
Source: Canaltech

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/28/2022
Source: Canaltech

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/28/2022
Source: Android Geek

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/11/2022
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Geek

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/11/2022
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Techprincess IT

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/11/2022
Source: Techprincess IT

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/11/2022
Source: HDblog.it

Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 04/08/2022
Rating: Total score: 69% features: 71%
Source: HDblog.it

Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 04/08/2022
Rating: Total score: 69% features: 71%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/30/2022
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 60% display: 89% mobility: 87% workmanship: 85%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/30/2022
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 60% display: 89% mobility: 87% workmanship: 85%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/26/2022
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 75% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/26/2022
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 75% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Tutto Android

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/26/2022
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 78% mobility: 86% workmanship: 75%
Source: Tutto Android

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/26/2022
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 78% mobility: 86% workmanship: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/26/2022
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/26/2022
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: 01Net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/17/2022
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 60% mobility: 100%
Source: 01Net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/17/2022
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 60% mobility: 100%
Source: Clubic

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/07/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Clubic

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/07/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Nextpit France

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/07/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Nextpit France

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/07/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: L' Eclaireur FNAC

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/30/2022
Source: L' Eclaireur FNAC

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/30/2022
Source: Presse Citron

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2022
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 90% performance: 90% display: 95% mobility: 90%
Source: Presse Citron

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2022
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 90% performance: 90% display: 95% mobility: 90%
Source: Les Mobiles

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/22/2022
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Les Mobiles

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/22/2022
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: CNet France

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/22/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet France

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/22/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/22/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/22/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: MA Reduc

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/15/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: MA Reduc

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/15/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Journal du Geek

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Journal du Geek

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2022
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 60% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2022
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 60% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Les Numeriques

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Les Numeriques

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Presse Citron

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/03/2022
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 90% performance: 90% display: 95%
Source: Presse Citron

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/03/2022
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 90% performance: 90% display: 95%
Source: Android.com.pl

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/21/2022
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android.com.pl

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/21/2022
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: MobilArena HU

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/08/2022
Rating: price: 70% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: MobilArena HU

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/08/2022
Rating: price: 70% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Svet Androida

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/29/2022
Source: Svet Androida

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/29/2022
Source: Smartmania.cz

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/12/2022
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 84% features: 83% mobility: 90% workmanship: 87%
Source: Smartmania.cz

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/12/2022
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 84% features: 83% mobility: 90% workmanship: 87%
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/25/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/25/2022
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/17/2022
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/17/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/17/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/17/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/07/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/07/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/07/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/07/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/05/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/05/2022
Source: Genk

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/04/2022
Source: Genk

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/04/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/01/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/01/2022
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/31/2022
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/31/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/31/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/31/2022
Source: Genk

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/30/2022
Source: Genk

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/30/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/27/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/27/2022
Source: Techtimes.vn

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/26/2022
Source: Techtimes.vn

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/26/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/25/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/25/2022
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/23/2022
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/23/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/23/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/23/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/22/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/22/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 03/21/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 03/21/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/21/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/21/2022
Source: FPT shop

Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 03/18/2022
Source: FPT shop

Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 03/18/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/18/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/18/2022
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 03/18/2022
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 03/18/2022
Source: Cell Phones

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Cell Phones

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Alt om Data

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/22/2022
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Alt om Data

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/22/2022
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/20/2022
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/20/2022
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Computerblog.ro

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/18/2022
Source: Computerblog.ro

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/18/2022
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Specifications

Processor: Samsung Exynos Exynos 1280
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G68 MP4
Display: 6.40 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.186kg
Price: 369 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal

As you would expect from a Samsung mid-ranger, Galaxy A33 5G excels on multimedia and photography front. The phone feels great at hand, despite the plastic build and has IP67 rating. However, Samsung should have spent more time optimizing the new Exynos 1280 chipset.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/02/2022
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 75% performance: 70% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85%
Source: Hitech Century

The Samsung Galaxy A33 is a triumph of design that brings some of the best qualities in their higher end flagships to a sub RM1.5K price point. You get IP67 water resistance, a large battery, a great display and an OIS-stabilised rear quad camera with expandable storage too. Add in 4 years of OS updates and the A33 becomes a sound investment indeed.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/27/2022
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 100% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: 91mobiles

Now that you know how the Galaxy A33 5G is miles ahead of any other phone in its price range, you might be itching to get your hands on this phone as soon as possible. You can buy the Galaxy A33 5G from the official Samsung online store right now. It is also available for purchase from Croma, Vijay Sales, and other leading online stores. You can buy the Galaxy A33 5G in Awesome Blue, Awesome Black, Awesome Peach, and Awesome White colour options.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/26/2022
Source: OI Spice Tech News

The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G is an upper mid-range smartphone at an expected price of $359 (Rs 27,499 in India) approx. The phone carries a 6.4 inches Super AMOLED display with a 90Hz refresh rate and corning gorilla glass 5 protection. The phone runs on the latest Android 12 OS with One UI 4.1 user interface. The device is available in 6GB/8GB RAM with 128GB/256GB internal storage option. For performance, the device holds a 5nm Exynos 1280 chipset with Mali-G68 GPU. The Samsung Galaxy A33 smartphone has a quad rear camera with a 48MP main and 8MP ultrawide lens. Besides this, you also get a 5MP macro and 2MP depth sensor in the rear setup. The tiny dot-notched selfie has a 13MP lens with 1080p video recording support at 30fps. While the main camera can record 4K videos at 30fps. Apart from this, the phone has an under-display optical fingerprint sensor, NFC, GPS, and 5G support. The phone packs a Li-Po 5000 mAh battery with 25W fast charging support. This smartphone doesn’t support wireless charging and reverse charging.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/25/2022
Source: Tech Critter

So to wrap it up, I think out of all the 3 A series phones of this year – the A33, A53, and A73, the biggest winner of all is the Galaxy A33 5G thanks to the improvements in the main camera having OIS, IP67 rating, and the full software experience that is identical to its flagship counterparts. Considering the Galaxy A33 5G as a full-package experience with the price tag of RM1,499 attached to it, I’d say it’s definitely worth it. If you’re one that doesn’t really mind how smooth you scroll your social media apps or care about how many megapixels you can get out of the sensor, the Galaxy A33 5G is truly the one you should look for. In many ways, it is on-par with the Galaxy A53 5G too – which is why I think the Galaxy A33 5G is a better choice.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2022
Source: NLT

And so, in conclusion, I think out of all the 3 phones – as in the A33, A53, and A73, this Galaxy A33 got the biggest upgrade compared to the last generation. The three biggest upgrades are OIS for the main camera, IP67 rating, and also the software support policy to match its flagship counterparts. At the price of RM1,499, I still think it’s a bit steep – but it’s a price worth paying. I think that if you don’t particularly care about refresh rate or having the most megapixel count, then the Galaxy A33 5G is a really solid phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/22/2022
Source: Hitech Century

The rear camera quad camera array is equipped beyond the norm as its primary rear 48MP camera features optical image stabilisation which is something that’s rarer than hen’s teeth in budget phones and which gives the Galaxy A33 a decisive edge for steadier shots and videos. Up front is a fairly standard 13MP fixed focus selfie camera but it and the rear camera are capable of up to [email protected] video. Belying its size, the Galaxy A33 has a large 5,000mAh battery that’s able to last north of two plus days with modest use based on official sources. The phone also supports 25W fast wired charging though the pickle here is getting a compatible charger and they omitted one in the box this time around. For RM1,499 and with features that are rare in a budget phone in its price range like IP67 water resistance, 5G connectivity, stereo speakers, fast charging and OIS in its camera, our Galaxy A33 first look is very promising indeed. Stay tuned for our full review where we put it through its paces!
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/15/2022
Source: Tech Critter

The good news is that the Galaxy A33 5G already has the “alternate game performance management” option in the Game Launcher menu, so we expect very similar performance with the Galaxy A53 5G too. We’ll have our gaming test for this device coming soon. And that is all we have to share about the unboxing experience of the Galaxy A33 5G! It’s a very nice phone to look and hold – and our review will be coming soon.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/14/2022
Source: Unbox

Our review of the Galaxy A33 shows that it is the most balanced Samsung Galaxy A-series phone in the Philippines. Despite its fair share of shortcomings, the Galaxy A33 offers a number of features that are not present in other mid-range phones at the Php 20k price segment.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/01/2022
Source: Techradar

The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G has some clear strengths: the cameras, with their various modes, deliver social-media-ready snaps; the screen is bright and bold; the design is attractive; and the price is relatively affordable. While the A33 has a few rough edges, like its processing power and charging speed, the price makes these downsides a bit more palatable.
Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 03/18/2022
Source: Trusted Reviews

With a fast OLED screen, snappy chipset and an attractive design, the Galaxy A33 5G looks to be a very good mid-range phone at an even better price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: 9to5google

Sporting similar designs and internals, just what is the difference between the Galaxy A33 5G and Galaxy A53 5G? After spending some time with the duo we have a good idea of the strengths of each handset and which might be the better choice.
Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Pocket Lint

The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G makes quite a move from its position in 2021, with a new design and display, alongside boosted hardware, making this phone sit closer to the Galaxy A53 5G that it launches alongside. This reinvention of this phone sees the price jump from £249 to £329 (in the UK), breaking that £300 barrier. But in return you get a much better device. We suspect that Samsung wants to double down on this sweet spot because it's had great success here. First impressions of this handset are good, the design and display are immediately appealing - and we'll be bringing you a full run down of the performance as soon as we can.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Expert Reviews

The Galaxy A33 5G is looking to be a bit of a bargain. Costing just £329, you can buy two of these for the price of just one Galaxy S22, with a little bit of change left over, too. It might not be the flashiest of handsets, but following my brief hands-on session, there’s a lot to like here.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Sam Mobile

It’s clear that Samsung genuinely wants the Galaxy A33 to be a better device than all of its predecessors. Our initial impression from the Galaxy A33 hands-on is that it has succeeded in this mission. The new chipset makes it a capable device for its price point. The addition of IP67 water and dust resistance is just the cherry on top. Throw in the great software support and you’ve got a mid-range phone that stands in a league of its own.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Stuff TV

At £379 for the A33 5G and £399 for the A53 5G, we’re impressed both phones cram in so much, and overjoyed we’re not seeing piddly 64GB storage capacities and mediocre screens in midrange Samsung phones anymore. The Galaxy A53 5G, in particular, seems perfect for someone who wants Galaxy S22 experiences without the flagship price. Meanwhile, the A33 5G loses a little more screen to that notch, scales back the refresh rate and reduces the megapixels. That said, pretty much everything else is identical across both phones, from the in-display fingerprint scanners to the IP67 water and dust resistance, through to massive batteries and capable 5nm processors. Expected to launch for pre-order right now, and be available for purchase either at the end of March or the beginning of April 2022, if you’re a Samsung fan in need of a cost-effective upgrade, both these phones should be blipping your radar.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Phone Arena

To bring things up to a close, the Galaxy A33 5G seems like a pretty sweet deal. Dare I say sweeter than that for it's pricier brother, the Galaxy A53 5G? Samsung has made a few major improvements, which combined together make for a significant upgrade over the predecessor, including a major jump in processing, AI, and GPU power. When you sprinkle in the optical image stabilization, louder speakers, and better durability, it starts to look mighty appealing. That said, we can't wait to do a proper dive into this phone and bring you a full review of the Galaxy A33, so stay tuned for that.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/29/2022
Rating: Total score: 75% features: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Nextpit Germany

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/18/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/14/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/13/2022
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Basic Tutorials

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/04/2022
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 80% performance: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: A1 Blog

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/29/2022
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/01/2022
Rating: Total score: 81% features: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tuexperto

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/29/2022
Source: Xataka

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/18/2022
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/05/2022
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 55% features: 70% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: HDblog.it

Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 04/08/2022
Rating: Total score: 67% features: 71%
Source: Clubic

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/15/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Nextpit France

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/15/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Les Numeriques

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/07/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/25/2022
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/23/2022
Source: VNReview

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/22/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 04/16/2022
Source: Techtimes.vn

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/16/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/14/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/11/2022
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/31/2022
Source: FPT shop

Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 03/24/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/18/2022
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: Jagat Review

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/11/2022
Source: M3 PC för alla

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/16/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Samsung Galaxy A23
Specifications

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 680
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 610
Display: 6.60 inch, 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.195kg
Price: 200 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal

Okay, so let’s wrap up this review. Like I spoiled it at the very beginning, the Galaxy A23 is a… travesty. I guess you can argue that it has a few notable qualities like the attractive design, optimized software, and solid battery life, but they are heavily outweighed by the overall value of the phone in regards to its price. If you want a well-rounded phone in general, then the Redmi Note 11S and Realme’s Narzo 50 are a couple of great options in Nepal. And in the Indian market, the POCO X4 Pro 5G, Galaxy F23, Moto G71, and Realme 9 SE all offer a much better value than the Galaxy A23. What I’m trying to say is there’s simply no justifying this travesty of a phone. Maybe Samsung already has a cheaper ‘M’ or ‘F’ series rebrand ready for the A23. But even then I doubt it’ll be able to match the competition with its price-to-performance ratio.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/12/2022
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 60% performance: 65% display: 65% mobility: 90% workmanship: 75%
Source: OI Spice Tech News

The Samsung Galaxy A23 smartphone is announced in March 2022, and the phone arrives with a price tag of $221 (Rs 16,999 in India) approx. Let’s start with the screen that offers a TFT display with a 6.6 inches display. The FHD screen is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection and under the hood, the Galaxy A23 phone is powered by a 6nm – Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G chipset that provides Adreno 610 GPU support. As for the software end, the One UI 4.1 is integrated over the Android 12 OS. The Samsung Galaxy A23 comes with a quad-camera with a 50MP primary camera, 5MP ultrawide, 2MP macro, and 2MP depth lens. It also includes an 8MP selfie camera with this setup, you can record 1080p videos precisely. The Samsung Galaxy A23 is available in 4GB/6GB/8GB RAM with 64GB/128GB internal storage. The battery section brings a Li-Po 5000mAh battery with 15W fast charging support. The Galaxy A23 phone is available in Black, White, Peach, and Blue color options.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/18/2022
Source: Canaltech

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/19/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/19/2022
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/14/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/10/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/09/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/07/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/06/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 04/01/2022
Source: Genk

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/31/2022
Source: FPT shop

Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 03/30/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2022
Source: Cell Phones

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2022
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
Specifications

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 778G 5G
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Display: 6.70 inch, 2400:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.181kg
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Business Standard

The benefit that comes with Samsung is the promise of four coming updates, which is really enticing. At a lower price point, this phone was a perfect buy. The bloatware was a problem, but not as much a headache as earlier. Lack of a charger and cap at 25W was another issue, but you can look past it. If you can wait a few months, this phone would be a steal at a 20 - 25 per cent discount.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/09/2022
Source: Sam Mobile

The Galaxy A73 is, as the title of this review has already given away, an excellent phone. It’s pricier than it should be, but with a few discounts, the Galaxy A73 is a great package. Fast and fluid performance, great photos from the main camera, a beautiful high refresh rate display, a water resistant design, stereo speakers, and all-day battery life are all awesome to have, and the four years of OS upgrades that Samsung is promising is just unbeatable in any segment, let alone the A73’s. If you don’t care about software updates, though, I would recommend trying to get the Galaxy S20 FE, which can be purchased at a similar price in many markets. And look, there are also many other options on the market that offer an equal or better experience at a similar or lower price, so all I will say is that if you do end up buying the Galaxy A73, you won’t be disappointed.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/03/2022
Source: OI Spice Tech News

The Samsung Galaxy A73 smartphone arrives with its equal share of flaws and features. But, if you look at the whole picture, you are getting a pretty decent combination of software and specs. The display quality is great, but it lacks the HDR features, while the performance won’t feel that underwhelming. As far as software is concerned, you won’t face many problems, the transition between the apps is quite good. The camera section improved, and the battery renders ample screen time.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/02/2022
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal

While the Galaxy A73 isn't exactly a bad phone in any way, its confusing price tag mixed with the lack of differentiation from last year's Galaxy A52s means we are hesitant on recommending it to anyone looking for a semi-flagship Samsung phone right now. Instead, you should save some money and go with the A52s which is almost the same phone as the A73.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/30/2022
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 75% performance: 85% display: 95% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Pokde

The Samsung Galaxy A73 is an excellent midrange smartphone with strong overall performance. It can’t match flagship devices but if you don’t need the luxury of a high-end camera system or blazing fast speeds, this will certainly be able to satisfy you, especially with a price tag of RM2,099. The 4 years of OS upgrades and 5 years of security patches just sweetens the deal even more.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/29/2022
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 85% performance: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: KL Gadget Guy

Overall, the Galaxy A73 5G is a great all-rounder mid-range phone that one shouldn’t hesitate to pick up if you aren’t ready to spend two months of a typical Malaysian salary on a flagship phone, although its selling price of RM2,099 is a little hard to swallow for some, as you can easily top up slightly extra cash for a Galaxy S21 FE, which at least offers true flagship performance and a camera system that can serve you better, but for those who wants to feel more awesome, perhaps the Galaxy A73 5G’s design and colors might just be your cup of tea.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/29/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: The Indian Express

For me, authenticity means not being afraid of your “true” self and being real whether in the workplace or relationship. Right around the time, when I was trying to understand the true meaning of accepting myself, the Galaxy A73 showed a clear path. It’s a premium mid-range phone (starts at Rs 41,999) that never tries to project itself as an alternative or equivalent to the flagship Galaxy S22 Plus; instead, it pitches itself as an all-new device for someone who has never experienced the kind of features it got at this price point. It could be a big phone… it might lack the latest and most advanced Snapdragon chip… it might not come with a glass back… but these things don’t really matter when the product truly differentiates itself from the competition and tries to win over customers for what it offers. The Galaxy A73 is not bringing anything new or trying to fix something; it’s offering a choice to customers at a certain price point without overpromising anything. That’s a good thing. It’s a healthy practice by making everyone clear what to expect and what not to expect.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2022
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Hitech Century

The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G brings to the table an exceptional amount of value for what you pay for. For RM2,099, you’re getting a large 120Hz display that is fantastic to behold, good overall performance, 5G connectivity, a decent set of cameras for casual users, an IP67 water resistant chassis and expandable storage, making it a very capable workhorse.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/24/2022
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 70% performance: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: 91mobiles

The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G starts at Rs 41,999 and for the price, gets more than a few things right. For one, the device is among the rare breed of Android phones priced under Rs 50K to ship with an IP rating. Furthermore, the device looks good too and is relatively lightweight as well. More importantly, the handset ships with a capable processor that can not just tackle everyday tasks without breaking a sweat, but can also run games at respectable graphics settings. That’s not to say that the phone is perfect. In fact, you can get a significantly faster Android with a premium design for the same price or less. Furthermore, unlike the competition, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G doesn’t ship with a fast wired charger in the box and the handset’s wired charging speeds pale in comparison to the competition as well. Be that as it may, the device offers a capable camera stack and what is quite possibly, the most refined custom skin on any Android phone at the moment.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/21/2022
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: The Times of India

The Oppo F21 Pro 5G is all about camera performance. From picture-perfect portraits to overall colours and detailing, it ensures great images in daylight. However, for night photography, Oppo still needs to figure out something really impressive. But as we said, it’s not just about cameras. F21 Pro 5G provides decent battery life, stylish design, bright display, smooth user experience with lots of features, and decent overall performance for day-to-day tasks. Though, its 60Hz refresh rate display at the price of Rs. 27,999 surely leaves room for improvement. But, we can’t neglect the competition in the same price range and the biggest competitor is none other than its own Reno 7 5G with a better selfie camera, higher refresh rate and MediaTek Dimensity 900 5G processor in just an extra 1000 bucks. Besides this, Vivo V21 5G can be another option with a 44MP selfie camera and a higher refresh rate priced at Rs. 26,699. Well, if camera is not your priority, then there is Xiaomi 11i HyperCharge with good display and its 120W fast charging.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/20/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: NLT

Should you buy the Galaxy A73 5G? Yes. I think the Galaxy A73 5G is still one of the best mid-range smartphones that you can buy right now. The overall experience that the Galaxy A73 5G offers is magnificent – though the price is just… kinda high at RM2,099. I mean, you can get the Galaxy A52s at about RM1.5k from retailers at Shopee or Lazada now, but you won’t get the same software support as the Galaxy A73 5G, and I think that is one of the important factors that many people do not care about until it is too late.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/20/2022
Source: OI Spice Tech News

Samsung Galaxy A73 smartphone comes with 5G support at an expected price of $590 (Rs 44,990 in India) approx. As for the primary features, the phone comes with a 6.7 inches Super AMOLED panel for a better and smooth experience. The phone offers a 120Hz refresh rate display. Under the hood, the phone is powered by a 6nm Snapdragon 778G chipset that provides Adreno 642L GPU support. Also, you are getting the software layering of Android 12 based on the One UI 4.1 interface. Besides this, you can choose from 6GB / 8GB RAM that packs with 128GB / 256GB internal storage. Apart from the build quality, the phone weighs roughly 181 g. For the next level of photography and videography, the Samsung Galaxy A73 phone comes with a quad-camera setup that has a 108MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide, 5MP macro, and 5MP depth lens. Features in the rear camera setup include LED flash, HDR, Panorama, and face detection. On the front, the Galaxy A73 has a 32MP camera so you can click amazing selfies and video chat. With this setup, you can record videos in up to 4K on both cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/26/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/23/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/23/2022
Source: Cell Phones

Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 04/22/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/20/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/14/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/14/2022
Source: FPT shop

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/12/2022
Source: FPT shop

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 04/11/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/22/2022
Source: Cell Phones

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/18/2022
Comment
Samsung:
Qualcomm Adreno 618:
基于Adreno 600架构的集成(在Snapdragon 730中)图形卡。支持DirectX11_1,Vulkan 1.0,OpenCL 2.0,OpenGL ES 3.2。
Qualcomm Adreno 619:
Qualcomm Adreno 506:
ARM Mali-G57 MP2:
内置2个集群的中端显卡。 以瓦尔霍尔建筑为基础
ARM Mali-G57 MP1:
PowerVR GE8322 / IMG8322:
Qualcomm Adreno 610:
基于Adreno 600架构的集成(Snapdragon 665)图形卡。 GPU的性能介于Adreno 510和512/612之间,因此处于较低的中档范围。 支持DirectX11_1,Vulkan 1.0,OpenCL 2.0,OpenGL ES 3.2。
unknown:
Imagination PowerVR GE8320:
用于中档ARM SoC的集成显卡。
Imagination PowerVR GE8100:
ARM Mali-G52 MP2:
具有2个集群的中端集成图形卡。ARM声称G52系列比G51系列在同一工艺节点上快30%,效率高15%。
ARM Mali-G52 MP1:
ARM Mali-G68 MP4:
集成的中端显卡有4个基于Valhall架构的集群。
Qualcomm Adreno 642L:
用于智能手机和平板电脑的图形芯片,集成在高通骁龙778G SoC中。高通公司声称,它比Adreno 620快40%。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
SD 730:
高性能中端ARM SoC,具有8个CPU Kryo 470内核(两个高达2.2 GHz的快速ARM Cortex-A76内核和六个高达1.8 GHz的小型ARM Cortex-A55内核)和一个快速X15 LTE调制解调器(高达800 Mbit)下载)。 SoC采用8 nm工艺制造。
SD 450:
较低端的主流八核ARM Cortex-A53 SoC,主频高达1.8 GHz,Adreno 506 GPU,LPDDR3单通道内存控制器以及X9 LTE(Cat.7 300/150 Mbps)调制解调器。
SD 720G:
高性能中端ARM SoC,具有8个CPU Kryo 465内核(两个高达2.3 GHz的快速ARM Cortex-A76内核和六个高达1.8 GHz的小型ARM Cortex-A55内核)和一个X15 LTE调制解调器(高达800 Mbit)下载)。 SoC采用现代的8 nm工艺制造。
SD 778G 5G:
快速的中端ARM SoC有8个CPU Kryo 670内核(四个快速的ARM Cortex-A78内核,频率高达2.4 GHz,四个小型的ARM Cortex-A55内核,频率高达1.8 GHz)和一个集成的X53 5G调制解调器(下载速度高达3300 Mbps)。该SoC是在台积电的现代6纳米工艺中制造的。
Samsung :
Dimensity 700:
Dimensity 700是内置5G调制解调器的高速中端SoC。 2个高速ARM Cortex-A76核心(最高2.2GHz)和6个高能效Cortex-A55核心(最高2GHz)。
SC9863A:
在两个集群中配有8个ARM Cortex-A55内核的入门级八核SoC。一个性能集群最高可达1.6 GHz,高效集群频率最高可达1.2 GHz。 SoC还集成了LTE调制解调器,IMG8322 GPU和1080p视频支持。
Mediatek:
Helio P35 MT6765:
基于ARM的八核SoC(8x ARM Cortex-A53),频率高达2.3 GHz。该芯片还包括Cat.7 LTE调制解调器(下载速度为300 Mbps)。
Helio G80:
基于ARM的八核SoC,具有频率高达2 GHz的2个大型ARM Cortex-A75内核和频率1.8 GHz的6个小型节能ARM Cortex-A55内核。集成了Cat-7(DL)/ Cat-13(UL)LTE调制解调器(4G),ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GPU和最高950 MHz的AMR Mali G52 MC2。
Samsung Exynos:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
0.179 kg:
这是智能手机的常见重量。
0.211 kg:
77.21%: No rating comment found (one expected)!
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.