Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy A23 5G智能手机评论。强大的中档手机,配备OIS摄像头

中产阶级的通货膨胀。 Galaxy A23 5G与它的前辈相比,价格有了明显的跳跃。更多的摄像头、更快的充电速度和略微更现代的SoC应该是对此的补偿。这是否足够,或者在其他廉价的5G手机中可以找到更好的选择?
5G Android ARM Smartphone
三星Galaxy A23 5G

三星Galaxy A23 5G是三星阵容中较实惠的5G智能手机之一。在欧洲,该智能手机在审查时只有5G版本,尽管Galaxy A22 前身也提供4G版本,Galaxy A23 4G也在国际上有售。

制造商对64GB版本的Galaxy A23 5G要价244.99美元。这是一个重大的价格跳跃,比前代产品多出约70美元,从而改变了对比手机的类别。与此同时,前代产品的价格甚至进一步下降了。Galaxy A22 5G ,在审查时可以在网上以大约188.50美元购买。

在我们的评论中,我们将仔细研究,鉴于该设备的改进,这种附加费用是否值得,或者你是否应该购买前代产品。

请国际读者注意(德语区以外)。各地的价格可能差别很大,所以可能与上述价格不一致。

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Galaxy A Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 8 x 1.7 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 660 Gold (2x Cortex-A78) / Silver (6x Cortex-A55)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Memory
4 GB 
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixel 400 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, PLS, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD (dedicated, up to 1TB) , 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 165.4 x 76.9
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 25 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, OIS, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 5.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (Camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.2, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 1.492W/​kg (head), 1.251W/​kg (body) , fanless
Weight
197 g
Price
299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80.3 %
10/2022
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
197 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
79.6 %
08/2021
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
203 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.60"2400x1080
80.8 %
08/2022
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.59"2412x1080
81.7 %
07/2022
Motorola Moto G82 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
173 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2400x1080
80.3 %
06/2022
Huawei Nova 9 SE
SD 680, Adreno 610
191 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.78"2388x1080

Galaxy A23 5G有白色、浅蓝色和黑色三种颜色。这款智能手机采用了三星的Ambient Edge设计,目前较高端的Galaxy A设备都有这种设计。由于弯曲的边缘,相机模块非常顺利地与外壳融合在一起,磨砂的背面旨在给它一个更高质量的外观。

事实上,这种设计非常适用于日常使用,在任何情况下都不会显得格格不入。然而,智能手机的光泽边框与哑光背面不太匹配;在这里,哑光边框会更好。手机感觉很稳定,正面的选择性受力点只在屏幕的液晶上有几处可见。当受到扭转压力时,Galaxy 智能手机会悄悄地发出吱吱声。

与前代产品相比,Galaxy A23 5G的重量稍轻,但仍比同类手机重几克。在正面,屏幕周围有一个透明的边框,下巴很厚,前置摄像头隐藏在一个水滴状的凹槽中。屏幕由防碎的大猩猩5号玻璃保护。

三星Galaxy A23 5G
三星Galaxy A23 5G
三星Galaxy A23 5G
三星Galaxy A23 5G
三星Galaxy A23 5G
三星Galaxy A23 5G

尺寸比较

167.2 mm 76.4 mm 9 mm 203 g165.4 mm 76.9 mm 8.4 mm 197 g164.3 mm 75.6 mm 8.5 mm 195 g164.64 mm 75.55 mm 7.94 mm 191 g160.9 mm 74.5 mm 8 mm 173 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备--两种内存变体

Galaxy A23 5G有两个版本。

  • 64GB大容量存储/4GB内存。244.99美元
  • 128GB大容量存储/4GB内存。取决于地点,因为这在美国是不存在的。在德国,建议零售价为329欧元(约合330美元)。

用于移动支付服务的NFC是可用的,更现代的蓝牙5.1也是如此。

安装了一个USB-C端口,使该设备与许多充电器和其他配件兼容。然而,该端口内部只配备了USB 2.0,所以数据传输相对缓慢。

左边:SIM卡插槽
左边:SIM卡插槽
右边:音量摇杆,带指纹识别器的待机按钮
右边:音量摇杆,带指纹识别器的待机按钮
顶部: 麦克风
顶部: 麦克风
底部:扬声器、USB-C、麦克风、3.5毫米音频端口
底部:扬声器、USB-C、麦克风、3.5毫米音频端口

微型SD卡读卡器

我们使用AV-PRO-Angelbird V60 microSD参考卡来测试microSD端口,它与两个SIM卡插槽分开,非常方便。与前代产品一样,Galaxy A23 5G在我们的拷贝测试中令人印象深刻,并取得了明显高于其他智能手机的数据速率。

该读卡器在CPDT基准测试中也被证明是快速的。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
45.7 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
44 MB/s -4%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
28.9 MB/s -37%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
27.5 MB/s -40%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø41.4 (29.9-52.3)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø28.8 (15.3-45.8)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36.2 (29.8-46.8)
Motorola Moto G82 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø33.1 (23.8-41.8)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.9 (67.1-81.5)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø70.7 (11.8-76.8)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.1 (42.7-84.9)
Motorola Moto G82 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.2 (38-84.1)

软件--大量的预装软件

三星安装了Android 12,并将自己的OneUI 4.1放在上面,其主要设计是为了让你能用一只手很好地使用该智能手机。所有重要的主屏幕按钮都位于屏幕的下部区域。

在审查时,所安装的安全补丁是2022年8月的,所以可以使用另一个更新。这些应该是每3个月发布一次,三星规定总共有4年的更新。据我们在9to5Google的同事说,还计划对Android 13进行更新,但目前还不完全清楚Android 14是否可用于该智能手机。

正如三星通常的情况一样,你必须忍受一些预装的第三方应用程序,如微软Office、LinkedIn或Spotify。其中一些只能停用,不再可见,但不幸的是仍然占用了存储空间。三星还预装了其软件套件,其中包含几个也包含在Android (浏览器、新闻)的应用程序,从而增加了总的压舱物。至少,如果需要的话,这些都可以轻松卸载。

软件 三星Galaxy A23 5G
软件 三星Galaxy A23 5G
软件 三星Galaxy A23 5G

通信和GNSS - 众多的4G频率

WiFi 5是三星Galaxy A23中最快的WLAN标准,因此与该价格范围相当。我们在与华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000参考路由器测试下确定的速度也在350Mbps左右的通常水平。传输速率也被证明是非常稳定的。

在移动通信方面,支持5G,但只在6级以下范围。与Galaxy A22 5G的前身相比,这款智能手机识别的4G频率要多得多,所以在国外旅行时,你可以经常使用移动互联网。

我们还随机测试了4G网络中的信号强度。Galaxy A23 5G并不总是完全令人信服。在某些地区,它显示的接收条数明显少于高质量的智能手机。接收从未完全中断,但智能手机需要更强的信号,以便能够与网络可靠地通信。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=210, last 2 years)
654 MBit/s +98%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
352 (339min - 360max) MBit/s +7%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
342 (321min - 351max) MBit/s +4%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
330 (304min - 343max) MBit/s
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
307 (299min - 312max) MBit/s -7%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=211, last 2 years)
690 MBit/s +93%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
366 (351min - 381max) MBit/s +2%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
364 (349min - 382max) MBit/s +2%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
363 (354min - 376max) MBit/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
358 (334min - 374max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
348 (340min - 353max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
361 (322min - 366max) MBit/s
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø330 (304-343)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (334-374)
户外的GPS测试
户外的GPS测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

我们的评测设备能够接入GPS、GLONASS、Galileo和北斗网络进行定位。虽然在测试中没有探测到那么多的卫星,但在踏出门外后,其准确度立即达到了三米。

在实际测试中,我们去骑自行车,并把Garmin Venu 2智能手表作为对比设备。事实证明,Galaxy A23 5G的准确度比佳明手表差一点,但其追踪能力也不是完全失败。

因此,你可以问心无愧地使用Galaxy A23 5G进行日常导航。只有在需要绝对精确的时候,你才应该去看其他地方。

定位三星Galaxy A23 5G - 概述
定位三星Galaxy A23 5G - 概述
定位三星Galaxy A23 5G - 环节
定位三星Galaxy A23 5G - 环节
定位三星Galaxy A23 5G - 桥梁
定位三星Galaxy A23 5G - 桥梁
定位Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
定位Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
定位Garmin Venu 2 - 循环系统
定位Garmin Venu 2 - 循环系统
定位Garmin Venu 2 - 桥梁
定位Garmin Venu 2 - 桥梁

电话和语音质量 -Galaxy A23 5G,通话质量一般。

三星使用自己的电话应用,与谷歌的应用相比,它将重点更多地转移到拨号盘上。如果你不喜欢这个拨号器,你也可以从Play Store安装其他应用程序,但你应该小心选择信任哪个供应商。

可以进行VoLTE和VoWiFi通话,WiFi通话的位置会转发给移动网络供应商和谷歌,以便在紧急呼叫时可以定位智能手机。方便的是,VoWiFi可以通过快速访问菜单中的一个按钮打开和关闭。

总体而言,通话质量相当平庸。内部听筒没有过高的最大音量,但当你把它调到最大时,声音相当强烈。在较低的音量下,声音会好一点。麦克风传输语音时有轻微的噪音干扰。在免提模式下,对方是很容易理解的,但听起来有点闷。在这里说话不要太小声,否则声音将不再可闻。

相机 - 机上有OIS

用前置摄像头拍照
用前置摄像头拍照

与前代产品相比,Galaxy A23 5G的背面多了一个摄像头:增加了一个微距镜头,但只能在特殊模式下使用,而且还受到只有200万像素的低分辨率的严重限制。

主摄像头的像素增加了几百万。5000万像素的传感器来自海力士,并具有光学图像稳定功能,这是一个亮点。全分辨率可能只是很少使用;相机默认将四个像素合并为一个像素,因此拍摄的照片为1250万像素。乍一看,图像看起来相当体面,但细节有点模糊,不如高质量的相机那么生动。

在低光照和高对比度的情况下,提亮的质量适中,在黑暗区域通常没有什么可识别的。明亮区域的清晰度是可以接受的。

主摄像头可以以最高1080p和30帧的速度录制视频。不幸的是,4K对于这个价格范围内的大多数智能手机来说仍然是一个梦想。在录制过程中,亮度调节效果相当好,但自动对焦不时有点慢。只要环境光线相对明亮,整体图像质量是不错的。镜头之间的切换只能在拍摄前进行。

Galaxy A23 5G上也有一个500万像素的广角镜头,但这更适合于快照:当你仔细观察时,远处的物体只是像素模糊,而且边缘有明显的失真和模糊。你只能在主摄像头和广角镜头之间直接切换,所以混合变焦是不可能的。

在光线良好的情况下,前置摄像头的自拍也很悦目,但你不应该把它们放大太多,否则会出现像素伪影。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera - flowerMain camera - environmentMain camera - low lightWide angle camera

在实验室里,在设定的照明条件下,该相机达到了经济实惠的中档手机的平均性能:在一勒克斯的亮度下,测试图表的图像仍然是可能的,但黑暗区域不再可见。在完整的演播室照明下,也可以看到图像中心有轻微的模糊现象。

ColorChecker
15.2 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
11 ∆E
17 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
13 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A23 5G: 10.88 ∆E min: 2.64 - max: 17.01 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
49.8 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
58.5 ∆E
49.5 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
60.1 ∆E
60.4 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
68.7 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
41 ∆E
68.9 ∆E
65.9 ∆E
50 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A23 5G: 42.97 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 68.94 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不包括充电器

Galaxy A23 5G不附带充电器,超薄的盒子里只有一个SIM卡工具和一条USB线。三星自己的商店只提供一个50瓦的快速充电器,价格约为50美元。制造商提供的合适的充电器可以在网上买到,价格不到10美元。另一方面,其他制造商的电源适配器在我们的测试中也没有问题。

在德国,三星为其智能手机提供24个月的保修。这可能因地而异,所以购买前一定要向供应商咨询。

输入设备和操作 - 良好的指纹识别器

Galaxy A23 5G的触摸屏和物理按键工作可靠。自适应的120赫兹屏幕在某些情况下使触摸屏操作非常流畅,但自动帧率调整并不总是最佳的,所以不时有卡顿现象发生。

指纹传感器被集成到待机按钮中,它能以最小的延迟解锁设备,并能非常可靠地识别被扫描的手指。

通过面部识别解锁也是可能的。屏幕在黑暗中提供充足的亮度,这通常足以让智能手机识别用户。然而,这是一个软件解决方案,分析来自前置摄像头的图像。这可能会受到黑客的攻击/操纵,因此不如采用红外线的硬件解决方案安全,如iPhone。

横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘

显示屏 - 遗憾的是没有那么亮

子像素网格
子像素网格

PLS屏幕的分辨率扩大到1080p,很适合这个价格范围,但摩托罗拉用Moto G82 5G证明了OLED屏幕也是可以的。

摩托手机的屏幕也比我们的评测样本要亮得多,其平均亮度为428cd/m²。虽然这明显超过了前代产品,但从对比设备来看,这仍然是一个中等的数值。

与黑色数值一起,对比度只是平均水平,这并不完全有利于颜色的光彩。

435
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 457 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 428.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.96 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 447 cd/m²
Contrast: 1442:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.54 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 7.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.03
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.60
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.59
Motorola Moto G82 5G
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.60
Huawei Nova 9 SE
LCD, 2388x1080, 6.78
Screen
4%
8%
35%
16%
Brightness middle
447
415
-7%
590
32%
635
42%
546
22%
Brightness
428
378
-12%
561
31%
640
50%
523
22%
Brightness Distribution
86
76
-12%
92
7%
96
12%
93
8%
Black Level *
0.31
0.26
16%
0.38
-23%
0.75
-142%
Contrast
1442
1596
11%
1553
8%
728
-50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.54
5.41
2%
5.15
7%
2.96
47%
0.6
89%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.04
9.77
3%
10.35
-3%
7.63
24%
1
90%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.3
4.8
34%
7.1
3%
4.8
34%
0.8
89%
Gamma
2.03 108%
2.348 94%
2.143 103%
2.214 99%
2.25 98%
CCT
8853 73%
7748 84%
8540 76%
6970 93%
6540 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

我们在使用光谱光度计和CalMAN软件进行测量时注意到的第一件事是,智能手机的亮度传感器并不总是工作在最佳状态,在明亮的环境中偶尔会提供太少的亮度。

我们的测量结果还显示出明显的蓝色色调和颜色值的偏差非常大。

另一方面,我们没有记录任何PWM闪烁,即使在非常低的亮度下。

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3色彩空间
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

这款智能手机在阴天仍可在户外使用,但在阳光直射下,屏幕上的强烈反光和相对较低的最大亮度成为一个问题。

视角稳定性很好。最多,在非常平坦的视角下,会出现轻微的颜色偏移。

视角
视角
户外使用
户外使用

性能 -Galaxy A23 5G的坚实力量

高通骁龙695 5G是去年的一款SoC,很适合用于预算型中端设备。Galaxy A23 5G肯定比它的前辈有更多的动力,而且这款智能手机在日常使用中通常运行平稳。

然而,在重新启动或插入新的SIM卡后,系统的反应不是很灵敏。在使用更复杂的应用程序时,性能也达到了极限,但你仍然可以毫无问题地运行许多更简单和适度复杂的程序。

尽管显示屏是120赫兹的面板,但你不能使120赫兹的设置成为永久性的,这意味着操作要么流畅,要么有轻微的延迟,这取决于情况。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years)
913 Points +34%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
687 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
680 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (659 - 697, n=24)
676 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
671 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
564 Points -17%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
382 Points -44%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=219, last 2 years)
2996 Points +50%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1998 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1997 Points
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1946 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1663 - 2038, n=24)
1904 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1712 Points -14%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1661 Points -17%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points +114%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
409358 Points +19%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
399726 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (344344 - 416086, n=18)
389461 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
344344 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
287506 Points -17%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=214, last 2 years)
11787 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
9742 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (6897 - 11732, n=23)
9629 Points -1%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
9363 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7843 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
7434 Points -24%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
6687 Points -31%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points +61%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
593 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (521 - 606, n=18)
583 Points +12%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
552 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
521 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points +82%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3705 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3171 - 3848, n=19)
3648 Points +15%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3596 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3171 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3005 Points -5%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2575 Points -19%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points +42%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7986 Points +18%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7976 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (6789 - 8231, n=19)
7725 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6789 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6486 Points -4%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
5667 Points -17%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points +98%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4836 Points +53%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
4473 Points +41%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4311 Points +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3167 - 4836, n=19)
4227 Points +33%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
3424 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3167 Points
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points +241%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4423 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3975 - 4426, n=19)
4340 Points +4%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4323 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4166 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2398 Points -42%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2123 Points -49%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1078 - 1434, n=19)
1253 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1172 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1128 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1125 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1103 Points -2%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1067 Points -5%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)
21146 Points +312%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8794 Points +71%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
5265 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (4924 - 5839, n=10)
5173 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
5133 Points
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4924 Points -4%

Galaxy A23 5G的图形性能不仅与前代产品相当,而且更快。所以Adreno 619在这里做得很好。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1073 Points +206%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
354 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
351 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
351 Points 0%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
124 Points -65%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
363 Points +2%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
360 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
355 Points
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
125 Points -65%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
125 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
100 Points -72%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1204 Points +1%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1201 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1196 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1074 Points -10%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
442 Points -63%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1209 Points +1%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1206 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1198 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1094 Points -9%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
453 Points -62%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2898 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2865 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2822 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2698 Points -6%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2540 Points -11%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2736 Points +3%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2710 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2655 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2141 Points -19%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1120 Points -58%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2770 Points +3%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2734 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2699 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2244 Points -17%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1279 Points -53%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3561 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3529 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3383 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3350 Points -1%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2853 Points -16%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3001 Points +4%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2973 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2899 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2290 Points -21%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1190 Points -59%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3104 Points +4%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3086 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2994 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2463 Points -18%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1367 Points -54%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2959 Points +4%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2917 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2856 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2360 Points -17%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1343 Points -53%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2837 Points +4%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2809 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2733 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2217 Points -19%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1168 Points -57%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3481 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3393 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3370 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3047 Points -10%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2817 Points -17%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps -26%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
52 fps -36%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
95 fps +4%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
91 fps
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
61 fps -33%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
43 fps +5%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
33 fps -20%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
48 fps +4%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
46 fps
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
37 fps -20%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +3%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
30 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps -28%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps -29%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +6%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps -31%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -26%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
12 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps -32%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.8 fps -60%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.1 fps +5%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.8 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.5 fps -29%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.3 fps -57%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +6%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
19 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps -28%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps -54%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
21 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -29%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.7 fps -54%

用智能手机上网是相当快的:网页加载很快,图像显示也很快。当然,偶尔也会有短暂的等待时间,但这仍在限制范围之内。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (48.6 - 105.3, n=19)
71.2 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chrome 106)
67.19 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
64.165 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Chrome 102)
56.647 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
38.21 Points -43%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min +164%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (38.7 - 80.1, n=16)
54 runs/min +33%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
47.11 runs/min +16%
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Chome 102)
44.7 runs/min +10%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chome 106)
40.6 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chome 92)
37.2 runs/min -8%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)
100.2 Points +67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (58 - 111, n=18)
74.3 Points +24%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
64 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chrome 106)
60 Points
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Chrome 102)
58 Points -3%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (75 - 156, n=12)
101 Points +16%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
96 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chrome 106)
87 Points
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Chrome 102)
75 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
58 Points -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)
33503 Points +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (17849 - 31647, n=21)
24051 Points +16%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
22285 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Chrome 102)
21468 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chrome 106)
20787 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
16870 Points -19%
Huawei Nova 9 SE (Huawei Browser 12)
10729 Points -48%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
2543 ms * -31%
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Chrome 102)
2009.8 ms * -3%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chrome 106)
1948.1 ms *
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
1922.7 ms * +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1298 - 2501, n=18)
1769 ms * +9%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * +18%

* ... smaller is better

三星在Galaxy A23 5G中安装了一个快速的UFS 2.2存储,这使得传输速度比前代产品中老式的eMMC存储介质快得多。

由于加载时间和数据传输率的提高,这在日常使用中是非常明显的。

Samsung Galaxy A23 5GSamsung Galaxy A22 5GOnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GMotorola Moto G82 5GHuawei Nova 9 SEAverage 64 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-48%
-3%
-5%
40%
7%
110%
Sequential Read 256KB
485.1
300.5
-38%
509.21
5%
473.4
-2%
973.13
101%
Sequential Write 256KB
487.4
210.3
-57%
482.15
-1%
445.7
-9%
714.41
47%
Random Read 4KB
188.2
118
-37%
179.02
-5%
180.8
-4%
154.28
-18%
154.9 ?(88.5 - 220, n=17)
-18%
Random Write 4KB
163.1
69.2
-58%
147.46
-10%
155.5
-5%
211.27
30%

游戏 - 偶尔会有好的帧率

在游戏中,三星智能手机在Armajet中能管理约85帧,即使帧率波动很大。只有在少数情况下才能利用完整的120赫兹。至少在《PUBG Mobile》中,我们看到低设置下有稳定的40帧,高设置下有30帧。帧率是用GameBench软件套件测量。

如果你希望你的游戏乐趣绝对是面向未来的,没有卡顿,你可能需要掏出更多的钱,但大多数手机游戏在三星的Galaxy A23 5G上都可以接受的玩。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø85 (56-112)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.2.0: Ø39.4 (33-41)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.2.0: Ø29.4 (23-31)

排放--没有戏剧性的加热

温度

智能手机在背部的右上方区域升温最多:我们在这里登记的温度高达43.6℃。下部区域的废热则明显较低。总的来说,你可以感觉到手机在长时间的负载下发热,但在温和的天气下不会变得很严重。

系统稳定性也处于非常高的水平,所以处理器不需要节流,完全可以保持性能。这在3DMark压力测试中得到了证实。

Max. Load
 38.5 °C33.9 °C30.4 °C 
 40.1 °C33.5 °C30.4 °C 
 40.1 °C32.5 °C30.3 °C 
Maximum: 40.1 °C
Average: 34.4 °C
30.8 °C34.3 °C38.5 °C
31.3 °C34.1 °C43.6 °C
30.7 °C35.5 °C43.1 °C
Maximum: 43.6 °C
Average: 35.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.6 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.7 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 %
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99 % -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % +1%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.1 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.8 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.6 %
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
96.9 % -2%
01234567Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.14 (2.13-2.16)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)
Motorola Moto G82 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.16 (2.16-2.18)
Huawei Nova 9 SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø0.743 (0.73-0.754)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.2 (7.19-7.22)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.21 (7.21-7.23)
Motorola Moto G82 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.24 (7.23-7.27)
Huawei Nova 9 SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø2.69 (2.68-2.69)
热能开发--正面
热能开发--正面
热能开发--背面
热能开发--背面

发言人

Galaxy 智能手机的单声道扬声器做得很好:最大音量不错,音乐听起来相当丰富,高音也可以忍受。但你不应该期望有深沉的音调。

那些想要真正优质声音的人可以使用3.5毫米插孔和蓝牙5.1来连接外部音频设备。然而,正如三星手机的惯例,缺乏对aptX蓝牙编解码器的支持。作为交换,你得到的是三星内部的可扩展编解码器。因此,你在购买无线耳机时应注意兼容性。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.229.12531.625.53128.224.84029.630.75034.235.26326.723.28019.42210020.119.412513.823.416013.336.120010.441.725011.247.33159.552.1400957.35009.461.56309.364.680013.170.6100015.178.7125015.578.716009.676.820009.374.6250010.172.2315010.676400011.471.650001257.8630012.952.8800013.569.21000014.170.11250014.959.61600015.552.6SPL24.485.9N0.559.2median 12median 61.5Delta2.411.645.643.140.24033.43231.237.53540.727.524.720.119.819.619.317.222.615.931.912.438.71245.910.249.610.154.18.760.615.266.616.368.415.673.913.174.611.174.111.57411.772.914.171.114.465.617.763.616.567.716.769.718.174.117.573.218.854.927.183.50.854.2median 15.2median 66.62.712.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A23 5GSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 -Galaxy A23可以持续很长时间

消耗功率

事实证明,在满负荷状态下,三星的Galaxy A23 5G的能耗比前代产品略低,而在空闲模式下需要的能耗略高。与其他设备相比,Galaxy Phone的空闲消耗也相当高。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1 / 1.5 / 2 Watt
Load midlight 3.6 / 5.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
5000 mAh
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G82 5G
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
5%
26%
14%
-2%
-16%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.9
10%
0.8
20%
0.9
10%
0.886 ?(0.56 - 1.2, n=18)
11%
Idle Average *
1.5
1.3
13%
1
33%
1.2
20%
1.76 ?(0.91 - 4.76, n=18)
-17%
Idle Maximum *
2
1.7
15%
1.4
30%
1.4
30%
Load Average *
3.6
3.8
-6%
2.4
33%
3.3
8%
Load Maximum *
5.3
5.8
-9%
4.6
13%
5.2
2%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G: Ø2.91 (0.893-5.31)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.50.70.91.11.21.41.61.822.12.32.52.72.933.23.4Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.36 (3.19-3.57)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.15 (1.012-2.03)

电池寿命

凭借其5000毫安时的电池,Galaxy A23 5G可以管理较长的运行时间,但它们并不完全匹配前代产品。差异总体上为5%,这在日常使用中应该不会太明显。在我们的Wi-Fi中,18:19小时相当于在远离电源插座的情况下运行数天,只要智能手机不被置于太多压力之下。

Galaxy 电话可以用25瓦的最大充电功率进行充电。这比前代产品快得多,因为前代产品只允许最大15瓦的充电功率。与这个价格范围内的其他制造商相比,仍有改进的余地,但在完全空的电池下充电两小时是可以的。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
43h 06min
WiFi Websurfing
18h 19min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 29min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 05min
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
5000 mAh
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G82 5G
5000 mAh
Huawei Nova 9 SE
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
5%
-10%
-4%
-28%
Reader / Idle
2586
2853
10%
1985
-23%
2456
-5%
H.264
1289
1307
1%
1255
-3%
1245
-3%
WiFi v1.3
1099
1156
5%
1064
-3%
1022
-7%
795
-28%
Load
305
316
4%
277
-9%
298
-2%

Pros

+ 良好的性能值
+ 快速的内存
+ 运行时间长
+ 无PWM
+ 许多4G频率
+ 120赫兹屏幕
+ 相机中的OIS
+ 体面的游戏能力
+ 负载下没有节流现象

Cons

- 分辨率很低的微距相机
- 外壳只有适度的稳定性
- 不可靠的亮度传感器
- 几乎没有任何aptX蓝牙编解码器
- 预装了很多臃肿的软件
- 显示屏亮度低...
- ...和不准确的颜色

评语 - 全面翻新,但价格较高

在审查中。三星Galaxy A23 5G
在审查中。三星Galaxy A23 5G

三星在许多方面改进了其经济实惠的Galaxy A23 5G:更快的充电,更快的屏幕,更现代的存储,相机的光学图像稳定,更强的处理能力,以及由于更多的4G频段,旅行时的可用性大大改善。

然而,价格也大幅增加。你现在必须支付244.99美元购买这款智能手机。另一方面,Galaxy A23 5G在这个价格范围内表现良好。当然,外壳可以更稳定,新增加的微距摄像头由于分辨率低而难以使用,电池寿命也比前代产品略短。此外,你必须处理系统中的大量臃肿软件,并满足于三星自己的用户界面。

通过三星Galaxy A23 5G,三星更新了其中档手机,并在许多方面进行了改进。但这对买家来说,代价是增加了。

类似的昂贵的竞争对手,例如,可以在OnePlus的 Nord CE 2 Lite,它的加载速度更快,提供更多的存储空间。这款手机 摩托罗拉Moto G82 5G就其本身而言,有一个OLED屏幕。

价格和可用性

配备64GB存储空间的三星Galaxy A23 5G可以在美国直接通过制造商的网站在线购买。购买,价格为244.99美元。建议其他国家的感兴趣的买家直接通过三星、亚马逊或任何其他相关供应商查询。

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G - 10/08/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 68%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
83%
Games Performance
29 / 64 → 45%
Application Performance
68 / 86 → 80%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
67 / 90 → 74%
Camera
60%
Average
74%
80%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy A23 5G智能手机评论。强大的中档手机,配备OIS摄像头
Florian Schmitt, 2022-10-10 (Update: 2022-10-10)