Notebookcheck

三星Galaxy A22 5G智能手机评论。这款经济型5G手机能提供什么?

5G的兄弟姐妹。 Galaxy A22有4G或5G两种版本。虽然5G型号不提供OLED显示屏,但它确实提供了快速的互联网,一个多功能的相机系统,以及良好的性能率。我们在评论中仔细研究了三星的中档手机。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android ARM Smartphone
三星Galaxy A22 5G

今年,三星在中端市场上踏上了新的道路。一些机型有两款同名的智能手机,但无线技术不同。一个配备4G,一个配备5G,相当便宜的三星Galaxy A22也是这种情况。

在这篇评论中,我们将看一下拥有更快的移动网络的变体,即三星Galaxy A22 5G。它比4G版更大,有一个更漂亮的设计,而且智能手机在内部组件方面也有很大的不同。

5G手机的价格从229欧元(约合人民币268元)起,是一款负担得起的中档智能手机。它必须面对一系列强大的对手,这应该使这次审查变得有趣。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Galaxy A Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 700 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 399 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 49 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n78/​n79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9 x 167.2 x 76.4
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 15-watt charging (Samsung AFC)
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​1.8, phase-comparison AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/​30fps (camera 1); 5.0 MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 2); 2.0 MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.73 W/​kg (head), 1.23 W/​kg (body), fanless
Weight
203 g
Price
229 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80 %
08/2021
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
203 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.60"2400x1080
79 %
03/2021
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
205 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720
80 %
08/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
190 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2400x1080
79 %
06/2021
Motorola Moto G50
SD 480, Adreno 619
192 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720
80 %
07/2021
Nokia X10
SD 480, Adreno 619
220 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080

三星Galaxy A22 5G的外壳绝对有高质量的设计,有点让人想起目前的iPhone。侧面略带棱角的处理,背面则有丝绸般的光泽和深灰色、白色或浅紫色的亚光处理。智能手机的手感很好。

三星在背面使用塑料,但没有任何关于正面显示玻璃的报道,这使得很难评估显示屏的抗碎性。建造质量本身似乎很高,但当智能手机被扭曲时,可以听到明显的破裂声。用手指在正面和背面施加强大的压力,并不能穿过显示屏的液晶。

这款智能手机绝对不轻,只有203克,但比这个价格范围内的其他智能手机重不了多少。

三星Galaxy A22 5G
三星Galaxy A22 5G
三星Galaxy A22 5G
三星Galaxy A22 5G
三星Galaxy A22 5G
三星Galaxy A22 5G

Size comparison

169 mm 79.7 mm 9.1 mm 220 g167.2 mm 76.4 mm 9 mm 203 g164.9 mm 74.9 mm 9 mm 192 g164.2 mm 76.1 mm 9.1 mm 205 g161.81 mm 75.34 mm 8.92 mm 190 g

连接性--低溢价换取更多存储空间

64GB的eMMC闪存和4GB的内存在这个级别的手机中是个不错的配置,而且128GB的版本也有,价格合理,为20欧元(约23美元)。很好的是,三星还考虑了NFC,因为这允许移动支付和其他服务。

虽然USB接口被设计成USB-C接口,但它内部只支持USB 2.0速度,这意味着有线数据传输可能需要一段时间。

右边。音量摇杆,待机按钮
右边。音量摇杆,待机按钮
左边:SIM卡托盘
左边:SIM卡托盘
首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
底部。扬声器、USB-C端口、麦克风、3.5毫米音频插孔
底部。扬声器、USB-C端口、麦克风、3.5毫米音频插孔

微型SD卡读卡器

在我们的复制测试中,SD读卡器在这个价格范围内工作得相当快,它很好地利用了我们的快速参考微SD卡--Angelbird V60。

SDCardreader Transfer Speed - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
44 MB/s ∼100%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
16.1 MB/s ∼37% -63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13.4 MB/s ∼30% -70%
Motorola Moto G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
12.3 MB/s ∼28% -72%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707542.940.440.44045.841.439.93128.725.428.929.327.1282528.534.233.332.627.933.833.115.328.127.926.226.127.731.732.534.537.526.229.825.627.826.92624.629.22727.827.83124.529.526.628.825.32923.72430.627.430.326.527.826.928.726.729.627.328.725.927.825.428.628.728.925.425.426.126.827.826.531.52627.925.828.728.428.526.930.226.836.427.525.624.625.923.728.723.829.430.733.328.527.42926.732.328.526.126.828.425.929.927.731.926.728.126.525.626.934.925.727.225.531.729.329.225.428.725.727.225.126.927.642.940.440.44045.841.439.93128.725.428.929.327.1282528.534.233.332.627.933.833.115.328.127.926.226.127.731.732.534.537.526.229.825.627.826.92624.629.22727.827.83124.529.526.628.825.32923.72430.627.430.326.527.826.928.726.729.627.328.725.927.825.428.628.728.925.425.426.126.827.826.531.52627.925.828.728.428.526.930.226.836.427.525.624.625.923.728.723.829.430.733.328.527.42926.732.328.526.126.828.425.929.927.731.926.728.126.525.626.934.925.727.225.531.729.329.225.428.725.727.225.126.927.611.874.575.374.974.973.776.77476.175.274.175.275.475.274.27575.675.475.174.274.675.674.475.1757575.175.37474.774.774.875.674.973.975.175.474.175.673.476.374.674.575.27575.274.774.775.174.775.374.274.474.775.474.37574.674.974.674.474.6757574.574.6757474.874.674.975.374.8757574.574.775.774.474.173.475.37574.175.375.575.274.275.574.875.875.273.974.775.176.175.27474.276.875.174.275.175.574.975.374.274.875.97574.77572.143.744.243.944.245.244.644.918.149.345.746.145.246.346.449.3Tooltip
; Sequential write: Ø28.8 (15.3-45.8)
; Sequential read: Ø70.7 (11.8-76.8)

软件--对更新情况了解不多

Android 11已经预装在智能手机上,三星在上面添加了自己的OneUI 3.1。在测试时,安全补丁可以追溯到2021年5月,因此需要进行更新。

三星没有透露便宜的Galaxy A机型会有多少软件更新,其中还包括Galaxy A22 5G。然而,根据我们的经验,至少有可能更新到Android 12。制造商运行一个关于Android 更新的信息页面

智能手机上有许多三星的应用程序,也有一些第三方的应用程序,并不是所有的应用程序都可以完全卸载。

已经进行了DRM-L1认证,这意味着可以以高清质量观看流媒体内容。

三星Galaxy A22 5G软件
三星Galaxy A22 5G软件
三星Galaxy A22 5G软件

通信和GNSS -Galaxy 电话中稳定的WLAN

三星Galaxy A22 5G的名字已经暗示了它提供快速的互联网。在频率范围方面仍有改进的余地,特别是对LTE而言,但不是经常在世界各地旅行的用户应该能够应付现有的频率。

在我们的抽样测试中,我们发现信号强度相当平庸;在其他智能手机完全接收的地区,往往只有5格中的2格可用。

我们还用Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器检查Wi-Fi速度。Galaxy 智能手机在这里表现得非常好。虽然Wi-Fi 6没有提供,但级别标准的Wi-Fi 5却有,而且测试设备实现了相当高的传输速率,甚至与对比设备相比也是如此。此外,在整个测试过程中,测量的速率保持非常稳定。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=301, last 2 years)
439 MBit/s ∼100% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
348 (340min - 353max) MBit/s ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
346 (324min - 360max) MBit/s ∼79% -1%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
323 (289min - 329max) MBit/s ∼74% -7%
Motorola Moto G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
312 (292min - 320max) MBit/s ∼71% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
294 (286min - 301max) MBit/s ∼67% -16%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=301, last 2 years)
436 MBit/s ∼100% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
366 (347min - 374max) MBit/s ∼84% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
361 (322min - 366max) MBit/s ∼83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
350 (332min - 359max) MBit/s ∼80% -3%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
332 (318min - 336max) MBit/s ∼76% -8%
Motorola Moto G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
317 (256min - 332max) MBit/s ∼73% -12%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360322363365362361360358357366361366361356361358361359364359362365360364362354363364364363365322363365362361360358357366361366361356361358361359364359362365360364362354363364364363365340342346348343350350348351349352348353347351350348348351343347350345352345349347348348349Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø360 (322-366)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø348 (340-353)
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络
室外的GPS测试
室外的GPS测试

事实证明,这款智能手机的定位系统在户外非常快,它可以确定我们的位置,精确度高达2米,没有任何重大延迟,这非常好。它可以检测属于GPS、GLONASS、Galileo和BeiDou网络的卫星。此外,它还使用SBAS支持系统的卫星,使定位更加准确。

这款智能手机必须在我们的实地测试中展示它的能力,即用Galaxy A22 5G和Garmin Edge 520导航仪骑自行车。在桥梁部分,正确的车道没有被准确显示出来,曲线也有几次被遗漏,但整体定位精度很好,特别是考虑到价格范围。

Garmin Edge 520定位 - 概述
Garmin Edge 520定位 - 概述
Garmin Edge 520定位 - 转折点
Garmin Edge 520定位 - 转折点
Garmin Edge 520定位 - 桥梁
Garmin Edge 520定位 - 桥梁
三星Galaxy A22 5G定位 - 概述
三星Galaxy A22 5G定位 - 概述
三星Galaxy A22 5G定位 - 转折点
三星Galaxy A22 5G定位 - 转折点
三星Galaxy A22 5G定位 - Bridge
三星Galaxy A22 5G定位 - Bridge

电话和通话质量--三星电话,语音传输清晰

在我们的测试设备中使用了三星的内部电话应用。与谷歌的标准Android 应用程序相比,它更注重数字键盘,但它仍然很直接,易于使用。VoLTE和VoWiFi自然也在其中。

整体的通话质量是令人信服的。即使是相当响亮或安静的声音也能被麦克风可靠地接收到。另一端的人听起来很清晰,他们也能明白地感知我们的声音。

摄像机 - 没有直接变焦

前置摄像头样本
前置摄像头样本

后面有三个摄像头,尽管只有主摄像头和广角摄像头可以实际用于拍照。第三个镜头只用于支持人像拍摄。

主摄像头的分辨率为4800万像素,但通常只有四分之一的分辨率的照片被生成。这是由于每四个像素被合并为一个,以增加光量。1200万像素的照片也完全可以满足绝大部分的使用情况。然而,如果用户愿意,也可以在特殊模式下拍摄全分辨率的照片。

用主摄像头拍摄的照片在色彩还原方面是适中的,这更符合自然规律,但使图像显得有些不那么鲜艳。当涉及到细节清晰度时,该相机的表现只能算一般。在表面上可以看到明显的像素伪影。在低光照和高对比度的情况下,相机对拍摄对象的照明做得相当好;它仍然可以显示细节,总体上做得相当好。

广角镜头可用于快照,但你不应该放大太多,因为细节不能清晰地显示。你只能通过直接在主镜头和广角镜头之间切换来变焦;中间水平是不可能的。

主摄像头可以以最大的2K分辨率和30帧的速度录制视频。一般来说,不支持以超过30帧的速度录制。只有在开始录像之前,才可以在镜头之间进行切换。通常情况下,自动对焦看起来相当快,但它反复需要一段时间,直到它对准实际需要的主题,而且它还不时地短暂抽动。曝光有时调整得非常突然,但至少它在变化时几乎是无级的。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera - FlowerMain camera - SurroundingsMain camera - Low lightWide-angle camera

Galaxy A22 5G的主摄像头也必须在实验室里证明自己。在良好的照明条件下,对比度很好,但个别细节在边缘处有点模糊。在弱光下,你实际上只能看到照片中主体的轮廓。

ColorChecker
14.1 ∆E
15 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
13 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
7 ∆E
14 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A22 5G: 12.69 ∆E min: 5.18 - max: 17.94 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
62 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
64.2 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
74 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
79.5 ∆E
68.7 ∆E
51 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A22 5G: 45.66 ∆E min: 13.55 - max: 79.5 ∆E

配件和保修 - 包括15瓦的充电器

除了一个最大容量为15瓦的充电器和一条充电线,这款智能手机只配备了一个SIM卡工具。至少在写这篇文章的时候,三星的网站上还没有为Galaxy A22 5G提供特殊的配件。如果你想要另一个15瓦的充电器,你可以直接从三星购买,价格略低于15欧元(约18美元)。

三星在中欧地区为该智能手机提供24个月的保修。有许多维修选择。从在特定日期开往各国的移动维修巴士到当地的服务中心,或者选择将设备送去。如果你想的话,你也可以在网上看到保修期外的维修费用。

输入设备和操作 - 指纹传感器集成在待机按钮中

触摸屏可以被非常精确地控制,物理按钮也非常容易找到。此外,硬件按钮与外壳完美契合。

待机按钮也是指纹传感器。它能可靠地识别放在上面的手指,但它需要短暂的时间来解锁设备。

除了音量摇杆和待机按钮,没有任何物理按钮,例如谷歌助手或相机快门释放。

纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘

显示屏 - 在弱光下还算不错

子像素网格
子像素网格

Galaxy A22 4G 不同,5G机型没有配备OLED显示屏。这本身并不是太糟糕,但Galaxy A22 5G的IPS面板相当暗淡。它的最大亮度为418cd/m²,比诺基亚X10 的显示屏要低得多,例如。这可能是一个问题,特别是在明亮的环境中。

亮度分布也很不均匀。显示器上最暗的区域的亮度只有最亮区域的76%。

然而,尽管价格低廉,Galaxy A22 5G有一个全高清面板,我们认为在这个价格范围内,这是相当值得称赞的。此外,该显示屏还支持90赫兹,在滚动和使用该设备时能获得更流畅的体验。

370
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
380
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 418 cd/m² Average: 378.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3.38 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 76 %
Center on Battery: 415 cd/m²
Contrast: 1596:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.41 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
95.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.348
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.60
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
TFT-LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Motorola Moto G50
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Nokia X10
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
-15%
31%
12%
-4%
Brightness middle
415
543
31%
550
33%
340
-18%
674
62%
Brightness
378
512
35%
515
36%
325
-14%
630
67%
Brightness Distribution
76
85
12%
86
13%
92
21%
83
9%
Black Level *
0.26
0.63
-142%
0.32
-23%
0.18
31%
0.78
-200%
Contrast
1596
862
-46%
1719
8%
1889
18%
864
-46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.41
4.9
9%
1.8
67%
4.75
12%
3.39
37%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.77
8.6
12%
3.1
68%
7.53
23%
6.95
29%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.8
6.3
-31%
2.5
48%
3.9
19%
4.4
8%
Gamma
2.348 94%
2.23 99%
2.28 96%
2.224 99%
2.175 101%
CCT
7748 84%
8120 80%
6326 103%
7384 88%
8301 78%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 147 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 147 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 147 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15315 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

我们登记了低于10%亮度的轻微PWM闪烁,这有助于进一步降低显示屏的亮度。这种频率对于敏感的用户来说肯定是有问题的,这就是为什么我们建议在购买智能手机显示屏之前在低亮度水平进行测试。

当我们使用分光光度计和CalMAN软件来评估显示器时,轻微的蓝色色调变得明显。色彩再现是可以接受的,但一些红色和橙色的色调明显不准确。想绝对确定他们在显示器上看到的是正确的颜色的用户,在这里可能会出错。

卡尔曼--灰鳞
卡尔曼--灰鳞
CalMAN--颜色精度
CalMAN--颜色精度
CalMAN - sRGB色彩空间
CalMAN - sRGB色彩空间
CalMAN - AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN - AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN - DCI-P3色彩空间
CalMAN - DCI-P3色彩空间
卡尔曼--饱和度
卡尔曼--饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).

在户外,昏暗的显示屏让人在阳光灿烂时很难看清任何东西。

显示屏的可视角度还算不错。最多,在倾斜设备时,可以看到图像非常轻微的变暗。

视角
视角
户外使用
户外使用

性能 - 联发科SoC带来的改进

联发科Dimensity 700安装在三星Galaxy A22 5G的SoC。其前身,Galaxy A21s ,仍然配备了内部的Exynos SoC,并不能真正跟上该价格范围内的其他智能手机。但这一次,情况不同了:Galaxy A22 5G甚至有时能在基准测试中取得领先。

然而,这款智能手机在图形性能方面仍然稍显落后。然而,与其他智能手机相比,这些差异在日常使用中应该很难真正注意到,因为它们太小了。

总的来说,三星在这一代的SoC方面做出了更好的选择,至少在5G模型中,它也得到了适当的优化。虽然在日常使用中可能会不时出现卡顿,但在运行要求非常高的应用程序或同时执行几个任务时,它们更有可能发生。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
564 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
472 Points ∼81% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
547 Points ∼94% -3%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
507 Points ∼87% -10%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
508 Points ∼87% -10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (454 - 574, n=5)
541 Points ∼93% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=248, last 2 years)
581 Points ∼100% +3%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1712 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1511 Points ∼76% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1692 Points ∼85% -1%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1627 Points ∼82% -5%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1687 Points ∼85% -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1347 - 1775, n=5)
1660 Points ∼83% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4455, n=248, last 2 years)
1991 Points ∼100% +16%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1376 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1418 Points ∼65% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1375 Points ∼63% 0%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
999 Points ∼45% -27%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
964 Points ∼44% -30%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1375 - 1474, n=4)
1406 Points ∼64% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=143, last 2 years)
2197 Points ∼100% +60%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1392 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1525 Points ∼67% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1402 Points ∼62% +1%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1048 Points ∼46% -25%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1088 Points ∼48% -22%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1346 - 1507, n=5)
1428 Points ∼63% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=146, last 2 years)
2269 Points ∼100% +63%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
7434 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8965 Points ∼89% +21%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
8351 Points ∼83% +12%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6928 Points ∼69% -7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (6783 - 10433, n=5)
8543 Points ∼85% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=63, last 2 years)
10043 Points ∼100% +35%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3357 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3499 Points ∼97% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3396 Points ∼94% +1%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3596 Points ∼100% +7%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3504 Points ∼97% +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (3149 - 3449, n=5)
3338 Points ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=257, last 2 years)
3474 Points ∼97% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3442 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3805 Points ∼93% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3501 Points ∼86% +2%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3767 Points ∼92% +9%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3683 Points ∼90% +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (3319 - 3501, n=5)
3430 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=257, last 2 years)
4073 Points ∼100% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3090 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2730 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3073 Points ∼99% -1%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3103 Points ∼100% 0%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2994 Points ∼96% -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2669 - 3535, n=5)
3068 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=257, last 2 years)
2801 Points ∼90% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3565 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3713 Points ∼89% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3553 Points ∼85% 0%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3647 Points ∼87% +2%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3645 Points ∼87% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (3277 - 3565, n=5)
3491 Points ∼84% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=278, last 2 years)
4170 Points ∼100% +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3619 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3975 Points ∼75% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3664 Points ∼69% +1%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3839 Points ∼73% +6%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3842 Points ∼73% +6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (3435 - 3664, n=5)
3593 Points ∼68% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=278, last 2 years)
5279 Points ∼100% +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3389 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3018 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3214 Points ∼95% -5%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3103 Points ∼92% -8%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3092 Points ∼91% -9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2824 - 3389, n=5)
3179 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=276, last 2 years)
2999 Points ∼88% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2360 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2575 Points ∼96% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2453 Points ∼92% +4%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2478 Points ∼93% +5%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2428 Points ∼91% +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2343 - 2453, n=5)
2397 Points ∼90% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=253, last 2 years)
2669 Points ∼100% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2217 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2525 Points ∼89% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2302 Points ∼82% +4%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2338 Points ∼83% +5%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2299 Points ∼81% +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2206 - 2313, n=5)
2252 Points ∼80% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=253, last 2 years)
2823 Points ∼100% +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3047 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2765 Points ∼87% -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3184 Points ∼100% +4%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3136 Points ∼98% +3%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3020 Points ∼95% -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2829 - 3508, n=5)
3112 Points ∼98% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=253, last 2 years)
2835 Points ∼89% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2463 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2659 Points ∼79% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2497 Points ∼74% +1%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2563 Points ∼76% +4%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2562 Points ∼76% +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2449 - 2497, n=5)
2468 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=277, last 2 years)
3386 Points ∼100% +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2290 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2597 Points ∼68% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2327 Points ∼61% +2%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2447 Points ∼64% +7%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2441 Points ∼64% +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2290 - 2336, n=5)
2311 Points ∼60% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=277, last 2 years)
3823 Points ∼100% +67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3350 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2901 Points ∼86% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3355 Points ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3076 Points ∼92% -8%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3098 Points ∼92% -8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2948 - 3355, n=5)
3242 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=277, last 2 years)
3045 Points ∼91% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2244 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2501 Points ∼95% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2219 Points ∼84% -1%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2284 Points ∼87% +2%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2275 Points ∼86% +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2188 - 2280, n=5)
2231 Points ∼85% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=214, last 2 years)
2638 Points ∼100% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2141 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2461 Points ∼83% +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2133 Points ∼72% 0%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2195 Points ∼74% +3%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2193 Points ∼74% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2133 - 2141, n=5)
2138 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=214, last 2 years)
2958 Points ∼100% +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2698 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2651 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2582 Points ∼96% -4%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2664 Points ∼99% -1%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2620 Points ∼97% -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2391 - 2956, n=5)
2643 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=214, last 2 years)
2649 Points ∼98% -2%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1094 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1245 Points ∼44% +14%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
986 Points ∼35% -10%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
980 Points ∼34% -10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1094 - 1103, n=3)
1100 Points ∼39% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=107, last 2 years)
2853 Points ∼100% +161%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1074 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1215 Points ∼41% +13%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
974 Points ∼33% -9%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
978 Points ∼33% -9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1074 - 1083, n=3)
1078 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 8672, n=103, last 2 years)
2955 Points ∼100% +175%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
316 Points ∼35%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
290 Points ∼32% -8%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
292 Points ∼33% -8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (316 - 321, n=2)
319 Points ∼36% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (83 - 2288, n=55, last 2 years)
896 Points ∼100% +184%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1073 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
284 Points ∼26% -74%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
284 Points ∼26% -74%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (312 - 1073, n=2)
693 Points ∼65% -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (117 - 1982, n=53, last 2 years)
896 Points ∼84% -16%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
52 fps ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
60 fps ∼71% +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
53 fps ∼63% +2%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
84 fps ∼100% +62%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
59 fps ∼70% +13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (51 - 57, n=4)
53.3 fps ∼63% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=218, last 2 years)
59.6 fps ∼71% +15%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
61 fps ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
68 fps ∼63% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
59 fps ∼55% -3%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
81 fps ∼75% +33%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
81 fps ∼75% +33%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (55 - 63, n=4)
59.5 fps ∼55% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 319, n=218, last 2 years)
108 fps ∼100% +77%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
33 fps ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
54 fps ∼82% +64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
33 fps ∼50% 0%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
66 fps ∼100% +100%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
35 fps ∼53% +6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (32 - 35, n=4)
33.3 fps ∼50% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=216, last 2 years)
47.1 fps ∼71% +43%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
37 fps ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
41 fps ∼65% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
37 fps ∼58% 0%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
41 fps ∼65% +11%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
41 fps ∼65% +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (34 - 38, n=4)
36.5 fps ∼57% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=217, last 2 years)
63.5 fps ∼100% +72%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
21 fps ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
51 fps ∼96% +143%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
23 fps ∼43% +10%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
53 fps ∼100% +152%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
26 fps ∼49% +24%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (21 - 23, n=4)
21.8 fps ∼41% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=215, last 2 years)
36.7 fps ∼69% +75%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
24 fps ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
26 fps ∼60% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
24 fps ∼55% 0%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
29 fps ∼67% +21%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
29 fps ∼67% +21%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (22 - 25, n=4)
23.8 fps ∼55% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=215, last 2 years)
43.6 fps ∼100% +82%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
11 fps ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼82% +109%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
11 fps ∼39% 0%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
28 fps ∼100% +155%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
14 fps ∼50% +27%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (11 - 13, n=4)
11.8 fps ∼42% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 61, n=214, last 2 years)
22.8 fps ∼81% +107%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
14 fps ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼50% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
10 fps ∼38% -29%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
16 fps ∼61% +14%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
16 fps ∼61% +14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (10 - 15, n=4)
13 fps ∼50% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=214, last 2 years)
26.2 fps ∼100% +87%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
30 fps ∼100% +131%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
14 fps ∼47% +8%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
30 fps ∼100% +131%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
16 fps ∼53% +23%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (13 - 14, n=5)
13.6 fps ∼45% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=283, last 2 years)
23.1 fps ∼77% +78%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
15 fps ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼64% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
15 fps ∼56% 0%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
17 fps ∼64% +13%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
18 fps ∼68% +20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (14 - 15, n=5)
14.8 fps ∼56% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=282, last 2 years)
26.6 fps ∼100% +77%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8.1 fps ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼89% +110%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8.9 fps ∼47% +10%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
19 fps ∼100% +135%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
9.9 fps ∼52% +22%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (8.1 - 8.9, n=5)
8.58 fps ∼45% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=283, last 2 years)
15.2 fps ∼80% +88%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5.5 fps ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
6.2 fps ∼60% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5.5 fps ∼53% 0%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6.4 fps ∼62% +16%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6.5 fps ∼63% +18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (5.5 - 5.6, n=5)
5.54 fps ∼53% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=283, last 2 years)
10.4 fps ∼100% +89%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
287506 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
286457 Points ∼59% 0%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
324606 Points ∼67% +13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (287506 - 356312, n=2)
321909 Points ∼66% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (121238 - 815441, n=50, last 2 years)
486464 Points ∼100% +69%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
249843 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
252308 Points ∼75% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
260248 Points ∼77% +4%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
257336 Points ∼76% +3%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
261982 Points ∼78% +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (249843 - 261067, n=3)
257053 Points ∼76% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=195, last 2 years)
337174 Points ∼100% +35%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8794 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
12331 Points ∼18% +40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
11953 Points ∼17% +36%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4787 Points ∼7% -46%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4707 Points ∼7% -46%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (5225 - 12011, n=4)
9496 Points ∼14% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 273221, n=76, last 2 years)
68422 Points ∼100% +678%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3005 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2735 Points ∼73% -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3047 Points ∼82% +1%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3228 Points ∼87% +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (3005 - 3107, n=4)
3043 Points ∼82% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 7123, n=204, last 2 years)
3730 Points ∼100% +24%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6486 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
4995 Points ∼73% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5760 Points ∼85% -11%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6298 Points ∼93% -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (5760 - 6712, n=4)
6277 Points ∼92% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 11774, n=204, last 2 years)
6806 Points ∼100% +5%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
4473 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3281 Points ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
4212 Points ∼94% -6%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3575 Points ∼80% -20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (4212 - 4473, n=4)
4344 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=204, last 2 years)
4385 Points ∼98% -2%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2398 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2687 Points ∼46% +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2675 Points ∼46% +12%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3843 Points ∼66% +60%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2398 - 2675, n=4)
2525 Points ∼43% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 15739, n=204, last 2 years)
5828 Points ∼100% +143%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1172 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1271 Points ∼96% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1328 Points ∼100% +13%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1254 Points ∼94% +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1152 - 1353, n=4)
1251 Points ∼94% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=204, last 2 years)
1282 Points ∼97% +9%

当涉及到浏览器性能时,这款智能手机也被证明是非常有能力的。它可以在基准测试中超过大多数对比设备,但诺基亚X10摩托罗拉Moto G50总体上还是要快一点。

在日常使用中,加载大型网站时有轻微的滞后,而且你必须不时地等待图片加载。然而,总的来说,浏览体验是相当快的。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=186, last 2 years)
50.2 Points ∼100% +31%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91)
46.02 Points ∼92% +20%
Nokia X10 (Chrome 91)
44.047 Points ∼88% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
38.213 Points ∼76%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (36 - 40.4, n=4)
37.9 Points ∼75% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90)
36.979 Points ∼74% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
36.302 Points ∼72% -5%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=198, last 2 years)
90.3 Points ∼100% +15%
Nokia X10 (Chrome 91)
78.822 Points ∼87% +1%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91)
78.6 Points ∼87% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
78.407 Points ∼87%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (69.5 - 78.4, n=4)
74.4 Points ∼82% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90)
71.721 Points ∼79% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
67.301 Points ∼75% -14%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=171, last 2 years)
49 runs/min ∼100% +32%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chome 91)
38.4 runs/min ∼78% +3%
Nokia X10 (Chome 91)
38.06 runs/min ∼78% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chome 92)
37.2 runs/min ∼76%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (36 - 38.3, n=4)
37.1 runs/min ∼76% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90)
36.8 runs/min ∼75% -1%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=205, last 2 years)
78.2 Points ∼100% +35%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91)
72 Points ∼92% +24%
Nokia X10 (Chrome 91)
67 Points ∼86% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
58 Points ∼74%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (50 - 58, n=3)
54 Points ∼69% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
51 Points ∼65% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90)
50 Points ∼64% -14%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=213, last 2 years)
17842 Points ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
16870 Points ∼95%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (15459 - 17380, n=4)
16421 Points ∼92% -3%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91)
15861 Points ∼89% -6%
Nokia X10 (Chrome 91)
15636 Points ∼88% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90)
15459 Points ∼87% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
14156 Points ∼79% -16%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=215, last 2 years)
3894 ms * ∼100% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
3466.7 ms * ∼89% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90)
3327.7 ms * ∼85% -31%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (2543 - 3387, n=4)
3101 ms * ∼80% -22%
Nokia X10 (Chrome 91)
2699.4 ms * ∼69% -6%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91)
2694.4 ms * ∼69% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
2543.4 ms * ∼65%

* ... smaller is better

在存储速度方面,三星Galaxy A22 5G描绘了一幅悲伤的画面:缓慢的eMMC闪存无法跟上 Galaxy A32 5G 小米Redmi Note 10 5G 的UFS存储。

总的来说,数据传输的时间比同等价位的设备要长,而且加载时间也更长。

Samsung Galaxy A22 5GSamsung Galaxy A32 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 10 5GMotorola Moto G50Nokia X10Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
114%
116%
23%
84%
-33%
82%
Sequential Read 256KB
300.5
858.19
186%
939.22
213%
392
30%
498.6
66%
274 (95.6 - 704, n=172)
-9%
787 (41.9 - 2037, n=291, last 2 years)
162%
Sequential Write 256KB
210.3
381.69
81%
398.05
89%
204.4
-3%
455
116%
178 (40 - 274, n=172)
-15%
350 (11.9 - 1321, n=291, last 2 years)
66%
Random Read 4KB
118
174.64
48%
151.55
28%
89.2
-24%
170.6
45%
58.6 (11.4 - 149, n=172)
-50%
140 (13.5 - 325, n=291, last 2 years)
19%
Random Write 4KB
69.2
167.15
142%
162.76
135%
131.7
90%
145.4
110%
28.7 (3.4 - 147, n=172)
-59%
126 (5.2 - 330, n=291, last 2 years)
82%

游戏--2D游戏中的惊奇

在我们的游戏基准测试中,Galaxy 手机有一个惊喜:在我们用GameBench的软件进行的帧率测量中,该智能手机在快速2D射击游戏Armajet中实现了非常高的帧率

诚然,它们在65至90帧之间波动很大,但这比一些高价位智能手机在这个游戏中达到的要多。三星似乎在这里对其智能手机进行了优化。

然而,在像PUBG这样的3D游戏中,又看到了该级别的典型性能,即最多只能达到40帧,而且这也不是那么稳定。如果你作为一个游戏玩家有非常高的要求,你可能要花更多的钱,但喜欢玩快速2D游戏并希望有高帧率的用户在Galaxy A22 5G上仍然有很好的机会。

控制也很可靠,触摸屏的反应也很快。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
05101520253035404550556065707580859087908990876966798178787289908990888890878890909090919086898287746666667176788688898684696566738890909089908890909089909090796875747472736967666666666670718288897984868273777570707280757868666566666679868990879089908769667981787872899089908888908788909090909190868982877466666671767886888986846965667388909090899088909090899090907968757474727369676666666666707182888979848682737775707072807578686665666666798689903740393939404040413939403939403740403831323626333537383722272835404040403939404040403940403035344134263840394039403839404038403939394087908990876966798178787289908990888890878890909090919086898287746666667176788688898684696566738890909089908890909089909090796875747472736967666666666670718288897984868273777570707280757868666566666679868990374039393940404041393940393940374040383132362633353738372227283540404040393940404040394040303534413426384039403940383940403840393939402831292930303030303031293030303030303029303028302930303030303030303030303030293030303030303029293030303030303028222628252427272830303030303030303030293030303030292930272726313026243029283030303030303030Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.60.13: Ø79.9 (65-91)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.5.0: Ø37.4 (22-41)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.5.0: Ø29.3 (22-31)

排放--在Galaxy 电话中没有节制。

温度

3DMark狂野生活极端压力测试
3DMark狂野生活极端压力测试
3DMark狂野生活压力测试
3DMark狂野生活压力测试

三星手机的表面在负载下加热到最高41.1℃(约106°F)。最热的区域是在智能手机的上部区域,即摄像头周围。温度上升属于正常范围,在正常环境温度下不应该导致任何问题。

此外,性能似乎并没有受到温度上升的影响,正如耐力基准测试所显示的。例如,在3DMark Wild Life压力测试中,在运行了20次基准测试后,性能仍然是初始性能的99%。

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.7 (978min - 981max) % ∼100% +1%
Motorola Moto G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.4 (981min - 987max) % ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99 (1098min - 1109max) % ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.9 (1240min - 1254max) % ∼99% 0%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.5 (290min - 294max) % ∼100% +1%
Motorola Moto G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99 (289min - 292max) % ∼99% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.8 (316min - 320max) % ∼99%
Max. Load
 40.1 °C37.7 °C36.7 °C 
 39.9 °C36.8 °C36.5 °C 
 39.1 °C36.9 °C36.6 °C 
Maximum: 40.1 °C
Average: 37.8 °C
36.2 °C36.9 °C39.4 °C
35.9 °C36.6 °C41 °C
35.7 °C36.9 °C41.1 °C
Maximum: 41.1 °C
Average: 37.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
热图-背面
热图-背面
热图--正面
热图--正面

演讲者

底部的扬声器必须单独完成其工作,这意味着该手机只提供单声道声音。在高达83.5 dB(A)的音量下,它能产生相当强烈的声音,但低音和中低音几乎没有,声音总体上不是很有力。与 Galaxy A32 5G的比较清楚地表明了两者的区别;你在那里得到的是相当丰满和平衡的声音。

至少在我们的测试设备中,你不必处理过于强调的高音,而且你仍然可以在全音量下听,而不会耳鸣。杜比全景声也可以在设置中激活,以改善声音,但我们只注意到一个最小的差异。

通过蓝牙和有线耳机的音频输出效果很好,但你将不得不放弃用于改善无线播放期间声音的aptX HD编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.643.12540.2403133.4324031.237.5503540.76327.524.78020.119.810019.619.312517.222.616015.931.920012.438.72501245.931510.249.640010.154.15008.760.663015.266.680016.368.4100015.673.9125013.174.6160011.174.1200011.574250011.772.9315014.171.1400014.465.6500017.763.6630016.567.7800016.769.71000018.174.11250017.573.21600018.854.9SPL27.183.5N0.854.2median 15.2median 66.6Delta2.613.135.944.92942.825.144.231.445.142.446.132.448.52647.821.547.41549.121.350.914.453.81457.513.559.511.964.312.265.512.666.513.471.712.275.712.37812.779.913.580.9138312.885.113.782.313.583.613.881.714.783.313.680.214.2731571.125.793.20.795median 13.5median 73110.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A22 5GSamsung Galaxy A32 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命--三星的手机充电缓慢

能源消耗

在功耗方面,三星手机与同类产品持平,甚至证明在一些空闲情况下比竞争对手的耗费略少。负载下的消耗也是适中的,而三星Galaxy A32 5G,特别是在这里被证明是非常耗电的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.3 / 1.7 Watt
Load midlight 3.8 / 5.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G50
5000 mAh
Nokia X10
4470 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-42%
-10%
-1%
-10%
-6%
-22%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.64
29%
0.71
21%
0.9
-0%
0.8
11%
0.767 (0.69 - 0.9, n=3)
15%
0.954 (0.37 - 2.5, n=233, last 2 years)
-6%
Idle Average *
1.3
1.95
-50%
2.08
-60%
1.5
-15%
1.7
-31%
1.807 (1.3 - 2.08, n=3)
-39%
1.813 (0.65 - 3.94, n=233, last 2 years)
-39%
Idle Maximum *
1.7
1.98
-16%
2.13
-25%
1.9
-12%
1.9
-12%
1.967 (1.7 - 2.13, n=3)
-16%
2.06 (0.69 - 4.2, n=233, last 2 years)
-21%
Load Average *
3.8
6.77
-78%
3.44
9%
3.5
8%
4.5
-18%
3.5 (3.27 - 3.8, n=3)
8%
4.44 (2.1 - 8.4, n=233, last 2 years)
-17%
Load Maximum *
5.8
11.42
-97%
5.58
4%
4.9
16%
5.9
-2%
5.57 (5.33 - 5.8, n=3)
4%
7.29 (3.68 - 12.3, n=233, last 2 years)
-26%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456784.385.025.315.325.415.285.285.235.295.34.015.255.25.364.115.075.055.245.065.115.384.625.685.74.684.295.3745.394.345.195.3644.164.53.995.325.364.264.295.624.784.235.275.35.325.685.345.425.235.395.275.245.214.074.135.124.015.046.916.786.736.866.815.936.75.44.585.144.865.455.085.363.955.685.364.095.325.455.475.164.334.025.484.15.565.125.525.125.615.155.135.085.714.024.385.245.375.545.345.434.074.033.864.244.27.186.986.876.677.186.966.926.647.177.096.946.317.137.146.8767.137.177.075.064.027.436.336.927.15.295.235.127.526.957.437.557.737.297.457.567.435.133.817.317.443.927.377.076.533.887.377.558.178.123.816.763.767.648.097.887.867.926.13.757.118.58.938.294.27.187.277.144.226.87.26.945.893.918.128.656.653.784.557.116.724.533.858.177.86.937.915.816.647.815.145.238.167.317.137.434.444.7286.858.637.828.498.538.088.68.037.397.866.664.498.313.877.718.298.357.397.26.877.717.627.667.466.717.777.697.547.646.915.57.637.797.657.126.817.527.747.497.356.973.784.364.354.664.064.954.977.017.086.877.166.946.937.157.197.366.687.16.874.943.728.037.963.613.693.693.91Tooltip
: Ø6.04 (3.61-8.93)

Energy consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.30.50.70.911.21.41.51.71.92.12.22.42.62.72.93.13.33.223.123.433.223.073.043.043.122.963.113.093.133.052.962.933.052.992.922.92.943.032.952.973.162.972.9533.22.913.0433.143.032.983.033.133.083.083.042.933.153.033.023.083.133.213.043.013.23.093.063.123.243.113.093.113.223.123.433.223.073.043.043.122.963.113.093.133.052.962.933.052.992.922.92.943.032.952.973.162.972.9533.22.913.0433.143.032.983.033.133.083.083.042.933.153.033.023.083.133.213.043.013.23.093.063.123.243.113.093.111.2691.2881.271.2561.271.311.2611.2711.2581.2621.2611.291.271.2681.2691.2721.2651.251.2691.2711.2671.3911.2731.271.2631.2691.2681.3641.2911.2661.2731.2631.551.3081.271.2751.271.2871.2811.273Tooltip
; Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.06 (2.9-3.43)
; Idle 1min: Ø1.284 (1.25-1.55)

电池寿命

三星Galaxy A22 5G的运行时间与同类产品持平。5,000毫安时的电池使其具有不错的续航能力,大大优于Galaxy A21s 。与内部的Exynos芯片相比,迈向联发科SoC的一步在这里可能是值得的。

在我们的Wi-Fi测试中超过19小时,这款智能手机应该很容易在不充电的情况下度过两个工作日。当电池水平下降到30%以下时,情况会有所缓解。智能手机不需要马上插电,而是仍有许多小时的正常使用时间。

电池的最大充电功率为15瓦。考虑到目前30瓦甚至65瓦的充电技术,这是很低的。如果智能手机偶尔需要2个多小时才能再次充满电,或者你无法在短时间内将这么多电量注入电池,你也不应该感到惊讶。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
47h 33min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
19h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 47min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 16min
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G50
5000 mAh
Nokia X10
4470 mAh
Battery Runtime
9%
-4%
3%
-17%
Reader / Idle
2853
2958
4%
2976
4%
3026
6%
2435
-15%
H.264
1307
1323
1%
1013
-22%
1302
0%
977
-25%
WiFi v1.3
1156
1235
7%
1113
-4%
1198
4%
896
-22%
Load
316
393
24%
341
8%
326
3%
297
-6%