三星Galaxy A13 4G智能手机评论--三星预算手机的慷慨升级
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
76.5 % | 05/2022 | Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1 | 195 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
74.9 % | 12/2021 | Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1 | 205 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
77.6 % | 05/2022 | realme C35 T616, Mali-G57 MP1 | 189 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
79 % | 11/2021 | Xiaomi Redmi 10 Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2 | 181 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
78.5 % | 03/2022 | Nokia G21 T606, Mali-G57 MP1 | 190 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 |
案例 - 简单的塑料构建
Galaxy A13的外壳与它的前辈A12没有相似之处。 Galaxy A12:现在的外壳不再是哑光的质感塑料,而是带有完全重新设计的相机模块的光亮后盖。加上白色、黑色和新的浅蓝色,现在总共有三种颜色可供选择。
光滑的表面吸引了指纹,使Galaxy A13看起来相当普通。
前面有一个小水滴缺口,提供82%的屏占比。这在这个价格类别中是相当标准的。我们对机箱的坚固构造感到满意,它在施加压力时能可靠地保护屏幕的液晶层。
连接性 -Galaxy 支持NFC的智能手机
三星智能手机(国际版)有两种存储配置。
- 4GB内存/64GB存储。189欧元
- 4GB内存/128GB内存:209欧元realme C35智能手机评测--200欧元以下的强大功能
美国版具有32GB的存储空间和3GB的RAM。由于使用eMMC内存,存储的读写速度很慢,而一些竞争对手,如 Realme C35已经提供更快的UFS存储。
值得庆幸的是,三星Galaxy A13 4G支持NFC的移动支付服务。
SD卡阅读器
由于有专门的microSD卡插槽,两张SIM卡和一张存储扩展卡可以同时使用。在我们的复制基准中,无论是前代的 Galaxy A12和我们的测试设备都表现得相对较好,而使用我们的参考microSD Angelbird V60卡的CPDT基准测试结果则偏弱。对于一款经济型手机来说,其读写速度总体上是不错的。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Angelbird V60) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Angelbird V60) | |
Nokia G21 (Angelbird V60) | |
realme C35 (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件 -Galaxy A13与Android 13
通信和GNSS - 更快的Wi-Fi
在Wi-Fi模块方面,Galaxy A13 4G向前迈出了一步,现在支持Wi-Fi 5。虽然这不是最新的标准,但对于200美元以下的预算手机来说,它仍然不是一个必然的选择。我们与参考路由器华硕GT-AXE11000一起记录了超过300Mb/s的稳定传输速度,这既代表了与前代产品相比的重大改进,也代表了相对于其竞争对手的良好结果。
看一眼支持的移动通信标准,就会发现缺乏5G。然而,一个 Galaxy A13的5G版本已经在美国上市,并有可能很快在欧洲上市。在4G手机的情况下,只有最常见的频率可用。因此,可能值得看看Galaxy 智能手机是否与你计划访问的国家的国内蜂窝网络兼容。
在测试过程中,我们通过在许多地方进行测量来评估信号强度。我们的研究结果表明,Galaxy A13在接近更昂贵的智能手机的信号强度之前,往往需要花费时间,即使如此,信号强度也会偶尔下降。
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000 | |
Average of class Smartphone (72.5 - 1736, n=36, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
Nokia G21 | |
realme C35 | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000 | |
Average of class Smartphone (78.3 - 1710, n=36, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
realme C35 | |
Nokia G21 | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12 | |
Average of class Smartphone (5.59 - 1395, n=236, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12 | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.5 - 1348, n=236, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F |
电话和通话质量 - 良好的语音质量
该电话应用来自三星,因此与谷歌的股票Android 电话应用不同。虽然它在功能上非常相似,但它更注重拨号盘,而拨号盘隐藏在谷歌应用的一个额外按钮后面。
通话质量很好。我们的对话伙伴通过听筒听起来很清晰,我们的声音也能清晰地传送。环境噪音消除功能也相当可靠地工作。通过免提电话,我们对话伙伴的声音仍然清晰,尽管在这种情况下听起来有些单薄。我们也不能说得太小声,否则我们的声音就无法传到对方那里。
照相机 - 简单的广角镜头
与前代产品相比,背面的主摄像头提供了更多的百万像素和一个稍大的光圈。在像素组合模式下有1250万像素,所拍照片的分辨率也略高,尽管这在实践中不太可能有太大的区别。
用主摄像头拍摄的照片锐度一般,细节水平也是如此。在低光照条件下和高动态范围内,相机取得了相对较好的平衡,而在更大的变焦水平上,图像的清晰度明显下降。
主摄像头以高达1080p和30FPS的速度录制视频,这是这个价格类别的标准。自动亮度调节工作得很好,而自动对焦的反应可以稍微快一些。视频记录的特点是色彩适中,图像质量与竞争对手相当。
背面的500万像素广角镜头拍出的照片细节模糊不清。然而,它仍然适用于只在智能手机显示屏上观看的快照。
前面还有一个800万像素的自拍相机。虽然自拍适合于智能手机显示屏和社交媒体,但放大后会发现严重缺乏细节。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightWeitwinkelkamera在我们的实验室里,在受控的照明条件下,前置摄像头的锐利度是缺乏说服力的。此外,图像的对比度也很差。在低光情况下,几乎没有任何细节可以看出来。


附件和保修 - 没有更多的充电器
三星已经加入了不再随便宜的智能手机提供充电器的趋势。这应该是对环境友好的,因为大多数人被认为在家里已经有一个或多个USB充电器,而且更小的盒子可以减少运输过程中的二氧化碳排放。同时,这当然也降低了三星的成本。
因此,包装中只包括一条USB线和一个SIM卡工具。在三星的网页上,目前还没有专门针对这款智能手机的配件。
制造商提供标准的12个月保修。由于价格固定,在此期间之后维修手机也不应该是一场经济灾难。
输入设备和处理 - 带有落差的指纹传感器
显示屏 - 许多明亮的像素
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 553 cd/m²
Contrast: 1257:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.64 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 5.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.18
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60 | Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F IPS LCD, 1600x720, 6.50 | realme C35 IPS, 2408x1080, 6.60 | Xiaomi Redmi 10 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50 | Nokia G21 IPS, 1600x720, 6.50 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 2% | -7% | 35% | -14% | |
Brightness middle | 553 | 446 -19% | 585 6% | 542 -2% | 492 -11% |
Brightness | 506 | 423 -16% | 558 10% | 518 2% | 484 -4% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 88 1% | 89 2% | 93 7% | 86 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.29 34% | 0.6 -36% | 0.22 50% | 0.46 -5% |
Contrast | 1257 | 1538 22% | 975 -22% | 2464 96% | 1070 -15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.64 | 4.94 -6% | 4.4 5% | 3 35% | 6.02 -30% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.86 | 8.81 -12% | 8.77 -12% | 6.7 15% | 9.13 -16% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.6 | 5.1 9% | 5.9 -5% | 1.4 75% | 7.1 -27% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.145 103% | 2.228 99% | 2.27 97% | 2.345 94% |
CCT | 8002 81% | 7890 82% | 8001 81% | 6450 101% | 8918 73% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise | |
↘ 11 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27 ms rise | |
↘ 20 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37 ms). |
性能 -Galaxy 性能较弱的手机
前辈的一个版本。 Galaxy A12已经使用了 三星Exynos 850.后者是2019年推出的带有8个核心的SoC,采用8纳米工艺生产。与同价位手机的性能比较显示。Galaxy A13 4G在处理能力方面落后。而 小米红米10位居榜首,但即使是 诺基亚G21和Realme C35也能提供明显更快的性能。
在日常使用中,一些要求较高的应用程序需要尝试启动或根本不启动,用户应避免过度的多任务处理,以防止性能陷入停顿。
Geekbench 5.3 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 1755, n=262, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
Nokia G21 | |
realme C35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (155 - 183, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (248 - 4914, n=262, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
Nokia G21 | |
realme C35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (586 - 1087, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G |
Antutu v9 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (111952 - 1041980, n=100, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (121238 - 134832, n=3) |
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
Average of class Smartphone (4436 - 18567, n=131, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
realme C35 | |
Nokia G21 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (4966 - 6065, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G |
CrossMark - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (226 - 1169, n=43, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
Average Samsung Exynos 850 |
BaseMark OS II | |
Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (895 - 8124, n=179, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (1533 - 1644, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
System | |
Average of class Smartphone (1542 - 19657, n=179, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (3042 - 3382, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
Memory | |
Average of class Smartphone (1012 - 9044, n=179, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (1533 - 1904, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
Graphics | |
Average of class Smartphone (478 - 25642, n=179, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (1159 - 1263, n=5) | |
Web | |
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 2392, n=179, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (893 - 990, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G |
AImark - Score v2.x | |
Average of class Smartphone (4293 - 286905, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
realme C35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (4354 - 4453, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G |
相比之下,图形性能不相上下。然而,小米10的额外图形核心 小米红米10在一些情况下显示了它的能力。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
realme C35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
realme C35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
realme C35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
realme C35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
realme C35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
realme C35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G |
GFXBench | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
realme C35 | |
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
realme C35 | |
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
Nokia G21 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
realme C35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
realme C35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
Nokia G21 | |
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
Nokia G21 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
realme C35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
realme C35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
Nokia G21 |
浏览网页也发现了相当低的系统性能。图片需要很长的时间来加载,用户体验偶尔会出现滞后。
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182.6, n=176, last 2 years) | |
realme C35 (Chrome 101) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101) | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (18.4 - 22.3, n=5) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=161, last 2 years) | |
realme C35 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chome 101) | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (15 - 16.7, n=5) |
WebXPRT 3 - --- | |
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 265, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101) | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (35 - 39, n=5) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=192, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101) | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (4875 - 5904, n=5) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (8327 - 9397, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96) | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) | |
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 15230, n=194, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
说到存储,三星使用了相当慢的eMMC闪存。这导致加载时间稍长,并没有完全提高响应速度。这款手机 Realme C35的UFS存储是一个更快的选择。
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | realme C35 | Xiaomi Redmi 10 | Nokia G21 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -32% | 112% | 4% | -20% | -34% | 112% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 308.5 | 302.3 -2% | 907.1 194% | 321.3 4% | 257.6 -16% | 273 ? -12% | 891 ? 189% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 236.8 | 74.5 -69% | 271.1 14% | 178 -25% | 180.6 -24% | 176.3 ? -26% | 430 ? 82% |
Random Read 4KB | 104.4 | 77.8 -25% | 137.8 32% | 100.7 -4% | 74 -29% | 58.8 ? -44% | 158.3 ? 52% |
Random Write 4KB | 67.3 | 47.21 -30% | 206.4 207% | 95.8 42% | 60.2 -11% | 30.7 ? -54% | 151 ? 124% |
游戏 - 入门级游戏
虽然Galaxy A13当然不是一款适合硬核游戏玩家的智能手机,但休闲的、要求不高的游戏玩家应该会比较满意。在快节奏的射击游戏Armajet中,我们达到了可观的30至35FPS。
要求更高的3D游戏《PUBG Mobile》是一个不同的故事。在20FPS左右时有非常明显的卡顿现象。这使得快速枪战变得很困难,即使是在抑制预期的情况下。我们使用GameBench软件来记录游戏中的帧率。
在我们的测试中,陀螺仪和触摸屏控制工作完美无缺,没有任何掉线。
排放--没有供热发展的烦恼
温度
智能手机在负载下的最大热量发展是一个惊喜。在室温下,我们测量的峰值为37.6℃(99.68°F)。
但这是否也意味着SoC不会节流?根据3DMark Wild Life压力测试的结果,是的。在循环运行相同的测试20次后,最坏的情况是有一个小的性能赤字。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F |
演讲者
智能手机底部边缘的扬声器提供了一个体面的最大音量水平和良好的整体声音。在最大音量下,它至少不会过度强调高音,使其很适合偶尔的音乐播放。
也就是说,我们建议使用外部扬声器或耳机来获得真正愉快的音频体验。它们可以通过3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙5.0连接。然而,只支持aptX编解码器的基本版本。用户将不得不使用SBC、AAC、LDAC和三星自己的可扩展编解码器。
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%
Nokia G21 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%
能源管理 - 15瓦的充电
能源消耗
Galaxy A13在空转时比较经济,在负载时也不会消耗过多的电力。
充电率被限制在15瓦,导致充电时间超过两个小时,这取决于电池水平。由于Galaxy A13不包括充电器,用户将不得不使用现有的USB适配器或单独购买一个。不支持无线充电。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 10 5000 mAh | Average Samsung Exynos 850 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -17% | -1% | -18% | -12% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.9 | 1.4 -56% | 0.53 41% | 1.22 ? -36% | 0.915 ? -2% |
Idle Average * | 1.6 | 1.9 -19% | 2.01 -26% | 1.82 ? -14% | 1.702 ? -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.1 | 2.1 -0% | 2.02 4% | 2.42 ? -15% | 1.931 ? 8% |
Load Average * | 3.6 | 3.8 -6% | 4.11 -14% | 4.06 ? -13% | 4.47 ? -24% |
Load Maximum * | 5.3 | 5.6 -6% | 5.76 -9% | 5.94 ? -12% | 7.33 ? -38% |
* ... smaller is better
Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)
Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)
电池寿命
在电池和充电技术方面,与Galaxy A13的前辈相比,没有任何变化。仅仅由于显示屏的分辨率更高,运行时间可能会略微缩短,不过在日常使用中应该没有什么区别。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,差异仅有15分钟,总共14:24小时,三星Galaxy A13仍然提供良好的运行时间。
虽然在正常使用过程中,一次电池充电可以持续一整天,没有任何问题,但也有一些智能手机的耐力明显更强。
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F 5000 mAh | realme C35 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 10 5000 mAh | Nokia G21 5050 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 1% | 11% | -5% | 26% | |
Reader / Idle | 2164 | 2094 -3% | 2356 9% | ||
H.264 | 1054 | 1078 2% | 1002 -5% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 864 | 879 2% | 958 11% | 858 -1% | 1087 26% |
Load | 437 | 455 4% | 341 -22% |
Pros
Cons
结论--升级不错,但性能欠佳
三星的入门级主张,即 Galaxy A12,一直急需升级,以防止竞争对手将三星挤出这个价格段。Galaxy A13的Wi-Fi速度明显加快,屏幕更亮,分辨率更高,而且支持NFC,而这并不是所有竞争设备的标准配置,它提供了各种改进。
虽然你不应该指望一个200美元以下的手机有峰值的相机性能,但相对于它的价格级别,Galaxy A13的表现不错,用相机拍摄的照片可以看起来相当不错。
谈到外壳的外观和感觉,其他制造商的许多预算设备往往提供更多的东西,而且Galaxy A13,它使用与前代产品相同的SoC,也不完全是一个顶级的表现。
三星入门级智能手机的良好升级。Galaxy A13与竞争对手持平,尽管性能偏弱。
总的来说,如果你预算有限或需要一款基本的智能手机,Galaxy A13是值得考虑的。如果你能稍微拉长你的预算(并为欧盟的潜在买家多等一会儿),那么 Galaxy A13的5G版本具有更快的性能,可能值得仔细看看。另外, 小米红米10是另一个强有力的竞争者,在高分辨率显示屏的基础上提供90-Hz刷新率,价格也差不多。
价格和可用性
三星Galaxy A13 4G 32GB可以直接从三星。购买,价格为189.99美元。另外,该智能手机在亚马逊,售价约为165美元。售价约为165美元。
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
-
05/10/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt