Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy A13 4G智能手机评论--三星预算手机的慷慨升级

更好地介绍三星智能手机的世界。 以低于200美元的价格,三星Galaxy A13 4G提供了一个全高清屏幕和Wi-Fi 5。然而,它面临着强大的竞争。与去年的机型相比,其改进是否足以使其具有竞争力?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪
ARM Android Smartphone
三星Galaxy A13

近年来,我们经常发现,三星的经济型A系列智能手机不大能够与竞争对手,特别是来自中国的竞争对手提供的优秀价值主张竞争。其功能往往略显逊色,同时,与小米和其他公司相比,其价格也较高。

所有这些都可能随着Galaxy A13 4G的推出而改变,它现在的建议售价为189,99美元起。三星对智能手机的许多方面进行了改进,如显示屏,现在具有更高的分辨率。由于竞争对手当然也不会袖手旁观,因此,看看Galaxy 智能手机是如何与竞争对手抗衡的,这将是一件很有趣的事情。

Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Galaxy A Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 850 8 x - 2 GHz, Cortex-A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G52 MP1
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixel 400 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, PLS, Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 39 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, dedicated, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 165.1 x 76.4
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 15 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 5.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (Camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.2
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.367W/​kg (head), 1.390W/​kg (body) , fanless
Weight
195 g
Price
189 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
76.5 %
05/2022
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1
195 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.60"2408x1080
74.9 %
12/2021
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1
205 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
77.6 %
05/2022
realme C35
T616, Mali-G57 MP1
189 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
79 %
11/2021
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2
181 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"2400x1080
78.5 %
03/2022
Nokia G21
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
190 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
三星Galaxy A13的颜色变化
三星Galaxy A13的颜色变化

Galaxy A13的外壳与它的前辈A12没有相似之处。 Galaxy A12:现在的外壳不再是哑光的质感塑料,而是带有完全重新设计的相机模块的光亮后盖。加上白色、黑色和新的浅蓝色,现在总共有三种颜色可供选择。

光滑的表面吸引了指纹,使Galaxy A13看起来相当普通。

前面有一个小水滴缺口,提供82%的屏占比。这在这个价格类别中是相当标准的。我们对机箱的坚固构造感到满意,它在施加压力时能可靠地保护屏幕的液晶层。

三星Galaxy A13
三星Galaxy A13
三星Galaxy A13
三星Galaxy A13
三星Galaxy A13
三星Galaxy A13

尺寸比较

165.1 mm 76.4 mm 8.8 mm 195 g164.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.5 mm 190 g164 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 205 g164.4 mm 75.6 mm 8.1 mm 189 g161.95 mm 75.53 mm 8.92 mm 181 g

连接性 -Galaxy 支持NFC的智能手机

三星智能手机(国际版)有两种存储配置。

美国版具有32GB的存储空间和3GB的RAM。由于使用eMMC内存,存储的读写速度很慢,而一些竞争对手,如 Realme C35已经提供更快的UFS存储。

值得庆幸的是,三星Galaxy A13 4G支持NFC的移动支付服务。

左边:SIM卡插槽
左边:SIM卡插槽
右边。待机按钮,音量摇杆
右边。待机按钮,音量摇杆
底部。 3.5mm音频插孔、麦克风、USB-C插槽、扬声器
底部。 3.5mm音频插孔、麦克风、USB-C插槽、扬声器
首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风

SD卡阅读器

由于有专门的microSD卡插槽,两张SIM卡和一张存储扩展卡可以同时使用。在我们的复制基准中,无论是前代的 Galaxy A12和我们的测试设备都表现得相对较好,而使用我们的参考microSD Angelbird V60卡的CPDT基准测试结果则偏弱。对于一款经济型手机来说,其读写速度总体上是不错的。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
47.8 MB/s ∼100% +39%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
40.85 MB/s ∼85% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
34.3 MB/s ∼72%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.6 MB/s ∼43% -40%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.5 MB/s ∼43% -40%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø30.8 (17.6-38.8)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø32.3 (23.2-38.8)
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø37.9 (18.7-45.1)
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.8 (26-44.9)
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø30.5 (12.9-38.6)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø50 (37.9-54.4)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø50.2 (31.6-54.4)
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø78.4 (34.6-83.9)
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø66.8 (7.33-79.4)
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø75.5 (39.6-81.6)

软件 -Galaxy A13与Android 13

Galaxy A13预装了Android 12和三星的OneUI 4,该系统大大改变和扩展了操作系统的功能。安全补丁可以追溯到2022年3月,使其成为相对较新的补丁。

Galaxy A13应该至少还会有一次重大更新,即Android 13,尽管不知道以后的版本是否会被支持。

三星手机传统上具有制造商自己的应用程序,包括网络浏览器和文件资源管理器,这些应用程序在某种程度上被Android's自己的版本所取代。三星的应用只能被隐藏,但不能完全删除。此外,大多数为广告目的而预装的第三方应用程序可以被删除。

软件三星Galaxy A13
软件三星Galaxy A13
软件三星Galaxy A13

通信和GNSS - 更快的Wi-Fi

在Wi-Fi模块方面,Galaxy A13 4G向前迈出了一步,现在支持Wi-Fi 5。虽然这不是最新的标准,但对于200美元以下的预算手机来说,它仍然不是一个必然的选择。我们与参考路由器华硕GT-AXE11000一起记录了超过300Mb/s的稳定传输速度,这既代表了与前代产品相比的重大改进,也代表了相对于其竞争对手的良好结果。

看一眼支持的移动通信标准,就会发现缺乏5G。然而,一个 Galaxy A13的5G版本已经在美国上市,并有可能很快在欧洲上市。在4G手机的情况下,只有最常见的频率可用。因此,可能值得看看Galaxy 智能手机是否与你计划访问的国家的国内蜂窝网络兼容。

在测试过程中,我们通过在许多地方进行测量来评估信号强度。我们的研究结果表明,Galaxy A13在接近更昂贵的智能手机的信号强度之前,往往需要花费时间,即使如此,信号强度也会偶尔下降。

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (72.5 - 1736, n=36, last 2 years)
704 MBit/s ∼100% +115%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
328 (300min - 339max) MBit/s ∼47%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
299 (224min - 315max) MBit/s ∼42% -9%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
244 (179min - 255max) MBit/s ∼35% -26%
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (78.3 - 1710, n=36, last 2 years)
716 MBit/s ∼100% +101%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
356 (293min - 370max) MBit/s ∼50%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
347 (309min - 366max) MBit/s ∼48% -3%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
339 (328min - 362max) MBit/s ∼47% -5%
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1395, n=236, last 2 years)
481 MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
293 (284min - 301max) MBit/s ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
42.9 (21min - 65max) MBit/s ∼9%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1348, n=236, last 2 years)
469 MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
333 (299min - 358max) MBit/s ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
50.4 (41min - 57max) MBit/s ∼11%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø328 (300-339)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø356 (293-370)
室外的GPS测试
室外的GPS测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

在我们的测试中,卫星地理定位系统通过GPS、伽利略、GLONASS和北斗进行通信。虽然卫星上行链路很快就建立起来了,但5米以内的精确度只是一般。虽然检测到的卫星不多,但Galaxy A13能够可靠地定位我们。集成的罗盘,在地图应用程序中显示观看方向,很有帮助。

由于天气不好,我们不得不在车内进行实际测试。Galaxy A13并不总是精确地将我们置于道路上,但准确度仍然不错,更适合于日常的导航使用。

地理定位 Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
地理定位 Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
地理定位 Garmin Venu 2 - 绕行
地理定位 Garmin Venu 2 - 绕行
地理定位 Garmin Venu 2 - Bridge
地理定位 Garmin Venu 2 - Bridge
地理定位 三星Galaxy A13 - 概述
地理定位 三星Galaxy A13 - 概述
地理定位 SamsungGalaxy A13 - 绕行线
地理定位 SamsungGalaxy A13 - 绕行线
地理定位 三星Galaxy A13 - 桥梁
地理定位 三星Galaxy A13 - 桥梁

电话和通话质量 - 良好的语音质量

该电话应用来自三星,因此与谷歌的股票Android 电话应用不同。虽然它在功能上非常相似,但它更注重拨号盘,而拨号盘隐藏在谷歌应用的一个额外按钮后面。

通话质量很好。我们的对话伙伴通过听筒听起来很清晰,我们的声音也能清晰地传送。环境噪音消除功能也相当可靠地工作。通过免提电话,我们对话伙伴的声音仍然清晰,尽管在这种情况下听起来有些单薄。我们也不能说得太小声,否则我们的声音就无法传到对方那里。

照相机 - 简单的广角镜头

前置摄像头图片
前置摄像头图片

与前代产品相比,背面的主摄像头提供了更多的百万像素和一个稍大的光圈。在像素组合模式下有1250万像素,所拍照片的分辨率也略高,尽管这在实践中不太可能有太大的区别。

用主摄像头拍摄的照片锐度一般,细节水平也是如此。在低光照条件下和高动态范围内,相机取得了相对较好的平衡,而在更大的变焦水平上,图像的清晰度明显下降。

主摄像头以高达1080p和30FPS的速度录制视频,这是这个价格类别的标准。自动亮度调节工作得很好,而自动对焦的反应可以稍微快一些。视频记录的特点是色彩适中,图像质量与竞争对手相当。

背面的500万像素广角镜头拍出的照片细节模糊不清。然而,它仍然适用于只在智能手机显示屏上观看的快照。

前面还有一个800万像素的自拍相机。虽然自拍适合于智能手机显示屏和社交媒体,但放大后会发现严重缺乏细节。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightWeitwinkelkamera
click to load images

在我们的实验室里,在受控的照明条件下,前置摄像头的锐利度是缺乏说服力的。此外,图像的对比度也很差。在低光情况下,几乎没有任何细节可以看出来。

ColorChecker
22.7 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
17 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
12 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
6 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A13 4G: 15.27 ∆E min: 4.34 - max: 24.8 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
51.8 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
43 ∆E
60.1 ∆E
50.8 ∆E
32.3 ∆E
38.4 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
60.8 ∆E
62 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
72.2 ∆E
40.8 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
79.2 ∆E
68.6 ∆E
51 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
24 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A13 4G: 44.32 ∆E min: 13.7 - max: 79.23 ∆E

附件和保修 - 没有更多的充电器

三星已经加入了不再随便宜的智能手机提供充电器的趋势。这应该是对环境友好的,因为大多数人被认为在家里已经有一个或多个USB充电器,而且更小的盒子可以减少运输过程中的二氧化碳排放。同时,这当然也降低了三星的成本。

因此,包装中只包括一条USB线和一个SIM卡工具。在三星的网页上,目前还没有专门针对这款智能手机的配件。

制造商提供标准的12个月保修。由于价格固定,在此期间之后维修手机也不应该是一场经济灾难。

输入设备和处理 - 带有落差的指纹传感器

触摸屏给人的感觉是光滑的,而且反应灵敏,一直到角落里。

指纹传感器位于侧面的电源按钮内。虽然它并不总是可靠地响应,但它至少允许从待机状态下解锁智能手机。进入实际的主屏幕需要相当短的时间。

面部识别也是可用的,如果需要,可以与其他生物识别认证方法一起使用。虽然通过前置摄像头进行的面部识别工作可靠,但由于缺乏红外扫描,与Apple 的Face ID相比,安全性较低。

键盘纵向模式
键盘纵向模式
键盘横向模式
键盘横向模式

显示屏 - 许多明亮的像素

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

Galaxy A13的IPS屏幕提供了一个扩展的全高清分辨率。虽然这在技术上并不是这个价格类别中的一个例外,但与前代产品相比,它是一个显著的改进。平均亮度为506尼特,它也明显更亮。刷新率被限制在60赫兹。

由于屏幕的对比度和黑值只是平均水平,在黑暗区域可以观察到灰色的色调。

493
cd/m²
524
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
553
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
539
cd/m²
493
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 553 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 506.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 553 cd/m²
Contrast: 1257:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.64 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 5.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.18
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
IPS LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
realme C35
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Xiaomi Redmi 10
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Nokia G21
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Screen
2%
-7%
35%
-14%
Brightness middle
553
446
-19%
585
6%
542
-2%
492
-11%
Brightness
506
423
-16%
558
10%
518
2%
484
-4%
Brightness Distribution
87
88
1%
89
2%
93
7%
86
-1%
Black Level *
0.44
0.29
34%
0.6
-36%
0.22
50%
0.46
-5%
Contrast
1257
1538
22%
975
-22%
2464
96%
1070
-15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.64
4.94
-6%
4.4
5%
3
35%
6.02
-30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.86
8.81
-12%
8.77
-12%
6.7
15%
9.13
-16%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.6
5.1
9%
5.9
-5%
1.4
75%
7.1
-27%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.145 103%
2.228 99%
2.27 97%
2.345 94%
CCT
8002 81%
7890 82%
8001 81%
6450 101%
8918 73%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

尽管我们没有检测到PWM,但我们的CalMAN软件的灰度显示了明显的蓝色色调。相对于竞争对手来说,颜色的准确性很好,在最佳设置下的屏幕和打印的颜色之间的差异,肉眼不应该看到。然而,更昂贵的选择往往会在色彩准确性方面提供重大升级。

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度
CalMAN Farbraum - sRGB
CalMAN Farbraum - sRGB
卡尔曼-法布劳姆 - Adobe RGB
卡尔曼-法布劳姆 - Adobe RGB
卡尔曼-法布劳姆--DCI P3
卡尔曼-法布劳姆--DCI P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

虽然这款智能手机在户外仍可使用,但用户应坚持在阴凉处使用,因为反射和眩光会阻碍阳光直射下的视野。

虽然由于采用了IPS技术,可视角度非常好,但从极端角度观看屏幕时,在黑暗区域可以观察到微弱的红色纱幕。

视角
视角
户外使用
户外使用

性能 -Galaxy 性能较弱的手机

前辈的一个版本。 Galaxy A12已经使用了 三星Exynos 850.后者是2019年推出的带有8个核心的SoC,采用8纳米工艺生产。与同价位手机的性能比较显示。Galaxy A13 4G在处理能力方面落后。而 小米红米10位居榜首,但即使是 诺基亚G21Realme C35也能提供明显更快的性能。

在日常使用中,一些要求较高的应用程序需要尝试启动或根本不启动,用户应避免过度的多任务处理,以防止性能陷入停顿。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=262, last 2 years)
649 Points ∼100% +319%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
365 Points ∼56% +135%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
312 Points ∼48% +101%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
298 Points ∼46% +92%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
178 Points ∼27% +15%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (155 - 183, n=5)
175.2 Points ∼27% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
155 Points ∼24%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=262, last 2 years)
2142 Points ∼100% +266%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1265 Points ∼59% +116%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1185 Points ∼55% +102%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1184 Points ∼55% +102%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1087 Points ∼51% +85%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (586 - 1087, n=5)
944 Points ∼44% +61%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
586 Points ∼27%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1041980, n=100, last 2 years)
547376 Points ∼100% +306%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
134832 Points ∼25%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (121238 - 134832, n=3)
129282 Points ∼24% -4%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=131, last 2 years)
10125 Points ∼100% +104%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8842 Points ∼87% +78%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
8066 Points ∼80% +62%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
7805 Points ∼77% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
5739 Points ∼57% +16%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (4966 - 6065, n=3)
5590 Points ∼55% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
4966 Points ∼49%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (226 - 1169, n=43, last 2 years)
743 Points ∼100% +193%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
254 Points ∼34%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
 
254 Points ∼34% 0%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (895 - 8124, n=179, last 2 years)
4144 Points ∼100% +160%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2247 Points ∼54% +41%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1637 Points ∼40% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (1533 - 1644, n=5)
1599 Points ∼39% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1594 Points ∼38%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (1542 - 19657, n=179, last 2 years)
7360 Points ∼100% +137%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4065 Points ∼55% +31%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
3345 Points ∼45% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (3042 - 3382, n=5)
3239 Points ∼44% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
3112 Points ∼42%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (1012 - 9044, n=179, last 2 years)
4780 Points ∼100% +174%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3204 Points ∼67% +84%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1836 Points ∼38% +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (1533 - 1904, n=5)
1780 Points ∼37% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1744 Points ∼36%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (478 - 25642, n=179, last 2 years)
7046 Points ∼100% +470%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1878 Points ∼27% +52%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1263 Points ∼18% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1237 Points ∼18%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (1159 - 1263, n=5)
1219 Points ∼17% -1%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (718 - 2392, n=179, last 2 years)
1374 Points ∼100% +48%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1042 Points ∼76% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
947 Points ∼69% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (893 - 990, n=5)
931 Points ∼68% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
930 Points ∼68%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=120, last 2 years)
63713 Points ∼100% +1363%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7120 Points ∼11% +64%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
4725 Points ∼7% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
4453 Points ∼7% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (4354 - 4453, n=3)
4411 Points ∼7% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
4354 Points ∼7%

相比之下,图形性能不相上下。然而,小米10的额外图形核心 小米红米10在一些情况下显示了它的能力。

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
182 Points ∼100% +31%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
139 Points ∼76%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
129 Points ∼71% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
116 Points ∼64% -17%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
111 Points ∼61% -20%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
721 Points ∼100% +42%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
509 Points ∼71%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
464 Points ∼64% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
426 Points ∼59% -16%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
393 Points ∼55% -23%
Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
712 Points ∼100% +39%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
513 Points ∼72%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
463 Points ∼65% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
428 Points ∼60% -17%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
397 Points ∼56% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2628 Points ∼100% +21%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2298 Points ∼87% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2203 Points ∼84% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2177 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2098 Points ∼80% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1264 Points ∼100% +58%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
919 Points ∼73% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
839 Points ∼66% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
799 Points ∼63%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
783 Points ∼62% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1396 Points ∼100% +50%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1074 Points ∼77% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
954 Points ∼68% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
930 Points ∼67%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
917 Points ∼66% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3036 Points ∼100% +48%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2559 Points ∼84% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2427 Points ∼80% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2109 Points ∼69% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2054 Points ∼68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1265 Points ∼100% +60%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
939 Points ∼74% +19%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
814 Points ∼64% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
791 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
736 Points ∼58% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1416 Points ∼100% +55%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1109 Points ∼78% +21%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
959 Points ∼68% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
916 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
867 Points ∼61% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2957 Points ∼100% +55%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2400 Points ∼81% +26%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2336 Points ∼79% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2048 Points ∼69% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1912 Points ∼65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1709 Points ∼100% +45%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1471 Points ∼86% +25%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1236 Points ∼72% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1179 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1126 Points ∼66% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1817 Points ∼100% +41%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1656 Points ∼91% +28%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1385 Points ∼76% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1289 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1283 Points ∼71% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1394 Points ∼100% +57%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1103 Points ∼79% +24%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
945 Points ∼68% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
888 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
863 Points ∼62% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1250 Points ∼100% +62%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
935 Points ∼75% +21%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
806 Points ∼64% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
771 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
738 Points ∼59% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2959 Points ∼100% +56%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2379 Points ∼80% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2339 Points ∼79% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2031 Points ∼69% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1899 Points ∼64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1833 Points ∼100% +42%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1710 Points ∼93% +32%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1414 Points ∼77% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1295 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1273 Points ∼69% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1713 Points ∼100% +46%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1518 Points ∼89% +29%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1255 Points ∼73% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1175 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1142 Points ∼67% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3063 Points ∼100% +52%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2546 Points ∼83% +26%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2426 Points ∼79% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2032 Points ∼66% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2015 Points ∼66%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
42 fps ∼100% +91%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
33 fps ∼79% +50%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps ∼55% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps ∼52%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
46 fps ∼100% +84%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps ∼57% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps ∼52% -4%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
28 fps ∼100% +100%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
18 fps ∼64% +29%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps ∼50% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps ∼50%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps ∼100% +56%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps ∼64% 0%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps ∼64% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps ∼64%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps ∼100% +132%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps ∼68% +59%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.7 fps ∼46% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.2 fps ∼43%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps ∼100% +70%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.9 fps ∼62% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.4 fps ∼59% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.4 fps ∼59%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps ∼100% +116%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.1 fps ∼83% +78%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.1 fps ∼46%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5 fps ∼45% -2%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.6 fps ∼100% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6.1 fps ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6 fps ∼63% -2%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps ∼61% -3%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7 fps ∼100% +112%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6 fps ∼86% +82%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.9 fps ∼84% +79%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.4 fps ∼49% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.3 fps ∼47%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.5 fps ∼100% +59%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2.2 fps ∼63% 0%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.2 fps ∼63% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2.2 fps ∼63%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2 fps ∼57% -9%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps ∼100% +108%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.5 fps ∼86% +79%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9 fps ∼82% +70%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps ∼49% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.3 fps ∼48%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.7 fps ∼100% +59%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6.2 fps ∼64% +2%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.1 fps ∼63% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6.1 fps ∼63%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.2 fps ∼54% -15%

浏览网页也发现了相当低的系统性能。图片需要很长的时间来加载,用户体验偶尔会出现滞后。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182.6, n=176, last 2 years)
59.7 Points ∼100% +168%
realme C35 (Chrome 101)
45.399 Points ∼76% +104%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
28.58 Points ∼48% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101)
22.283 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
21.24 Points ∼36% -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (18.4 - 22.3, n=5)
19.9 Points ∼33% -11%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=161, last 2 years)
59 runs/min ∼100% +253%
realme C35
34.44 runs/min ∼58% +106%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
24.4 runs/min ∼41% +46%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chome 101)
16.73 runs/min ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
16.3 runs/min ∼28% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (15 - 16.7, n=5)
15.8 runs/min ∼27% -6%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 265, n=188, last 2 years)
89.7 Points ∼100% +130%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
48 Points ∼54% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101)
39 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
38 Points ∼42% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (35 - 39, n=5)
36.4 Points ∼41% -7%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=192, last 2 years)
22121 Points ∼100% +275%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
10625 Points ∼48% +80%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101)
5904 Points ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
5849 Points ∼26% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (4875 - 5904, n=5)
5333 Points ∼24% -10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (8327 - 9397, n=5)
8925 ms * ∼100% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
8472 ms * ∼95% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101)
8326.9 ms * ∼93%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
3706 ms * ∼42% +55%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 15230, n=194, last 2 years)
3285 ms * ∼37% +61%

* ... smaller is better

说到存储,三星使用了相当慢的eMMC闪存。这导致加载时间稍长,并没有完全提高响应速度。这款手机 Realme C35的UFS存储是一个更快的选择。

Samsung Galaxy A13 4GSamsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127Frealme C35Xiaomi Redmi 10Nokia G21Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-32%
112%
4%
-20%
-34%
112%
Sequential Read 256KB
308.5
302.3
-2%
907.1
194%
321.3
4%
257.6
-16%
273 ?(95.6 - 704, n=186)
-12%
891 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=259, last 2 years)
189%
Sequential Write 256KB
236.8
74.5
-69%
271.1
14%
178
-25%
180.6
-24%
176.3 ?(40 - 274, n=186)
-26%
430 ?(11.9 - 1465, n=259, last 2 years)
82%
Random Read 4KB
104.4
77.8
-25%
137.8
32%
100.7
-4%
74
-29%
58.8 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=186)
-44%
158.3 ?(13.5 - 325, n=259, last 2 years)
52%
Random Write 4KB
67.3
47.21
-30%
206.4
207%
95.8
42%
60.2
-11%
30.7 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=186)
-54%
151 ?(5.5 - 449, n=259, last 2 years)
124%

游戏 - 入门级游戏

虽然Galaxy A13当然不是一款适合硬核游戏玩家的智能手机,但休闲的、要求不高的游戏玩家应该会比较满意。在快节奏的射击游戏Armajet中,我们达到了可观的30至35FPS。

要求更高的3D游戏《PUBG Mobile》是一个不同的故事。在20FPS左右时有非常明显的卡顿现象。这使得快速枪战变得很困难,即使是在抑制预期的情况下。我们使用GameBench软件来记录游戏中的帧率。

在我们的测试中,陀螺仪和触摸屏控制工作完美无缺,没有任何掉线。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
05101520253035Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø33.2 (24-40)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.9.0: Ø24.4 (17-32)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.9.0: Ø21.3 (13-29)

排放--没有供热发展的烦恼

温度

智能手机在负载下的最大热量发展是一个惊喜。在室温下,我们测量的峰值为37.6℃(99.68°F)。

但这是否也意味着SoC不会节流?根据3DMark Wild Life压力测试的结果,是的。在循环运行相同的测试20次后,最坏的情况是有一个小的性能赤字。

Max. Load
 34.3 °C30.2 °C29.7 °C 
 34.8 °C30.8 °C29.9 °C 
 34.7 °C31 °C29.8 °C 
Maximum: 34.8 °C
Average: 31.7 °C
30 °C31.7 °C35.1 °C
30.7 °C32.8 °C37.8 °C
30.7 °C33.2 °C37.6 °C
Maximum: 37.8 °C
Average: 33.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  37.9 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 (3.06min) % ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.2 (2.57min) % ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.2 (4.26min) % ∼99% -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.9 (1.09min) % ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
97.2 (0.827min) % ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
96.1 (0.701min) % ∼97% -1%
00.20.40.70.91.11.31.51.722.22.42.62.833.33.53.73.94.1Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø0.84 (0.827-0.851)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø0.708 (0.701-0.73)
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø1.096 (1.09-1.102)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.07 (3.06-3.08)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.59 (2.57-2.59)
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.32 (4.26-4.34)
热像仪背面
热像仪背面
热像仪正面
热像仪正面

演讲者

智能手机底部边缘的扬声器提供了一个体面的最大音量水平和良好的整体声音。在最大音量下,它至少不会过度强调高音,使其很适合偶尔的音乐播放。

也就是说,我们建议使用外部扬声器或耳机来获得真正愉快的音频体验。它们可以通过3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙5.0连接。然而,只支持aptX编解码器的基本版本。用户将不得不使用SBC、AAC、LDAC和三星自己的可扩展编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2053532544.544.93133.7324033.434.35035.839.16330.133.78021.327.51002126.712516.329.716014.738.320012.945.425014.349.83151351.340010.856.150012.364.163013.564.580019.56510001571.8125014.172.4160014.975.5200011.975.3250012.869.9315015.466.1400016.571.4500016.772.8630017.269.6800018681000017.966.91250017.6671600018.354.8SPL2883.3N0.953.6median 15median 66.1Delta2.19.749.350.843.943.837.135.137.940.743.84531.833.92829.927.933.123.535.423.838.819.640.61943.117.549.215.252.716.8602168.222.376.518.781.417.376.115.870.415.868.117.470.418.472.220.270.420.369.420.173.121.471.721.871.521.365.821.855.631.685.61.661.2median 20.1median 68.21.810.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A13 4GNokia G21
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Nokia G21 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

能源管理 - 15瓦的充电

能源消耗

Galaxy A13在空转时比较经济,在负载时也不会消耗过多的电力。

充电率被限制在15瓦,导致充电时间超过两个小时,这取决于电池水平。由于Galaxy A13不包括充电器,用户将不得不使用现有的USB适配器或单独购买一个。不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.6 / 2.1 Watt
Load midlight 3.6 / 5.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 10
5000 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 850
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-17%
-1%
-18%
-12%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
1.4
-56%
0.53
41%
1.22 ?(0.9 - 1.5, n=5)
-36%
0.915 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=206, last 2 years)
-2%
Idle Average *
1.6
1.9
-19%
2.01
-26%
1.82 ?(1.6 - 2.1, n=5)
-14%
1.702 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=206, last 2 years)
-6%
Idle Maximum *
2.1
2.1
-0%
2.02
4%
2.42 ?(2.1 - 2.9, n=5)
-15%
1.931 ?(0.69 - 4, n=206, last 2 years)
8%
Load Average *
3.6
3.8
-6%
4.11
-14%
4.06 ?(3.6 - 4.6, n=5)
-13%
4.47 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=206, last 2 years)
-24%
Load Maximum *
5.3
5.6
-6%
5.76
-9%
5.94 ?(5.3 - 6.6, n=5)
-12%
7.33 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=206, last 2 years)
-38%

* ... smaller is better

Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)

012345Tooltip
: Ø3.14 (1.356-5.22)

Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)

00.20.40.60.80.91.11.31.51.71.92.12.32.52.62.833.23.43.6Tooltip
; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.88 (2.76-3.77)
; Idle 1min: Ø1.857 (1.4-2.12)

电池寿命

在电池和充电技术方面,与Galaxy A13的前辈相比,没有任何变化。仅仅由于显示屏的分辨率更高,运行时间可能会略微缩短,不过在日常使用中应该没有什么区别。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,差异仅有15分钟,总共14:24小时,三星Galaxy A13仍然提供良好的运行时间。

虽然在正常使用过程中,一次电池充电可以持续一整天,没有任何问题,但也有一些智能手机的耐力明显更强。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
36h 04min
WiFi Websurfing
14h 24min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 34min
Load (maximum brightness)
7h 17min
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
5000 mAh
realme C35
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 10
5000 mAh
Nokia G21
5050 mAh
Battery Runtime
1%
11%
-5%
26%
Reader / Idle
2164
2094
-3%
2356
9%
H.264
1054
1078
2%
1002
-5%
WiFi v1.3
864
879
2%
958
11%
858
-1%
1087
26%
Load
437
455
4%
341
-22%

Pros

+ 明亮、高分辨率的屏幕
+ 快速的Wi-Fi
+ 良好的通话质量
+ 没有PWM
+ 几乎没有任何发热现象

Cons

- 性能弱
- 非常基本的外壳
- 对4G的支持仅限于最常见的频率

结论--升级不错,但性能欠佳

在审查中。三星Galaxy A13 4G。测试设备由以下单位提供。
在审查中。三星Galaxy A13 4G。测试设备由以下单位提供。
cyberport.de

三星的入门级主张,即 Galaxy A12,一直急需升级,以防止竞争对手将三星挤出这个价格段。Galaxy A13的Wi-Fi速度明显加快,屏幕更亮,分辨率更高,而且支持NFC,而这并不是所有竞争设备的标准配置,它提供了各种改进。

虽然你不应该指望一个200美元以下的手机有峰值的相机性能,但相对于它的价格级别,Galaxy A13的表现不错,用相机拍摄的照片可以看起来相当不错。

谈到外壳的外观和感觉,其他制造商的许多预算设备往往提供更多的东西,而且Galaxy A13,它使用与前代产品相同的SoC,也不完全是一个顶级的表现。

三星入门级智能手机的良好升级。Galaxy A13与竞争对手持平,尽管性能偏弱。

总的来说,如果你预算有限或需要一款基本的智能手机,Galaxy A13是值得考虑的。如果你能稍微拉长你的预算(并为欧盟的潜在买家多等一会儿),那么 Galaxy A13的5G版本具有更快的性能,可能值得仔细看看。另外, 小米红米10是另一个强有力的竞争者,在高分辨率显示屏的基础上提供90-Hz刷新率,价格也差不多。

价格和可用性

三星Galaxy A13 4G 32GB可以直接从三星购买,价格为189.99美元。另外,该智能手机在亚马逊,售价约为165美元。售价约为165美元。

Samsung Galaxy A13 4G - 05/10/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
78%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
45 / 70 → 64%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
85%
Games Performance
10 / 64 → 16%
Application Performance
55 / 86 → 64%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
68 / 90 → 76%
Camera
50%
Average
71%
77%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Marius Schell
Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 319 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020
contact me via: LinkedIn
Ninh Duy
Translator: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 232897 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy A13 4G智能手机评论--三星预算手机的慷慨升级
Florian Schmitt, 2022-05-12 (Update: 2022-05-12)