三星Galaxy A13 4G智能手机评论--三星预算手机的慷慨升级

Name: Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Brand: Samsung

更好地介绍三星智能手机的世界。 以低于200美元的价格，三星Galaxy A13 4G提供了一个全高清屏幕和Wi-Fi 5。然而，它面临着强大的竞争。与去年的机型相比，其改进是否足以使其具有竞争力？

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 05/12/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪

ARM Android Smartphone

近年来，我们经常发现，三星的经济型A系列智能手机不大能够与竞争对手，特别是来自中国的竞争对手提供的优秀价值主张竞争。其功能往往略显逊色，同时，与小米和其他公司相比，其价格也较高。

所有这些都可能随着Galaxy A13 4G的推出而改变，它现在的建议售价为189,99美元起。三星对智能手机的许多方面进行了改进，如显示屏，现在具有更高的分辨率。由于竞争对手当然也不会袖手旁观，因此，看看Galaxy 智能手机是如何与竞争对手抗衡的，这将是一件很有趣的事情。

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
76.5 %	05/2022	Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1	195 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.60"	2408x1080
74.9 %	12/2021	Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1	205 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.50"	1600x720
77.6 %	05/2022	realme C35 T616, Mali-G57 MP1	189 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.60"	2408x1080
79 %	11/2021	Xiaomi Redmi 10 Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2	181 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
78.5 %	03/2022	Nokia G21 T606, Mali-G57 MP1	190 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.50"	1600x720

案例 - 简单的塑料构建

Galaxy A13的外壳与它的前辈A12没有相似之处。 Galaxy A12:现在的外壳不再是哑光的质感塑料，而是带有完全重新设计的相机模块的光亮后盖。加上白色、黑色和新的浅蓝色，现在总共有三种颜色可供选择。

光滑的表面吸引了指纹，使Galaxy A13看起来相当普通。

前面有一个小水滴缺口，提供82%的屏占比。这在这个价格类别中是相当标准的。我们对机箱的坚固构造感到满意，它在施加压力时能可靠地保护屏幕的液晶层。

尺寸比较

Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Nokia G21 Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F realme C35 Xiaomi Redmi 10 ❌

连接性 -Galaxy 支持NFC的智能手机

三星智能手机（国际版）有两种存储配置。

4GB内存/64GB存储。189欧元
4GB内存/128GB内存：209欧元realme C35智能手机评测--200欧元以下的强大功能

美国版具有32GB的存储空间和3GB的RAM。由于使用eMMC内存，存储的读写速度很慢，而一些竞争对手，如 Realme C35已经提供更快的UFS存储。

值得庆幸的是，三星Galaxy A13 4G支持NFC的移动支付服务。

SD卡阅读器

由于有专门的microSD卡插槽，两张SIM卡和一张存储扩展卡可以同时使用。在我们的复制基准中，无论是前代的 Galaxy A12和我们的测试设备都表现得相对较好，而使用我们的参考microSD Angelbird V60卡的CPDT基准测试结果则偏弱。对于一款经济型手机来说，其读写速度总体上是不错的。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	47.8 MB/s ∼100% +39%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	40.85 MB/s ∼85% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	34.3 MB/s ∼72%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	20.6 MB/s ∼43% -40%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	20.5 MB/s ∼43% -40%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø30.8 (17.6-38.8)

Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø32.3 (23.2-38.8)

realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø37.9 (18.7-45.1)

Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.8 (26-44.9)

Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø30.5 (12.9-38.6)

Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø50 (37.9-54.4)

Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø50.2 (31.6-54.4)

realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø78.4 (34.6-83.9)

Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø66.8 (7.33-79.4)

Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø75.5 (39.6-81.6)

软件 -Galaxy A13与Android 13

Galaxy A13预装了Android 12和三星的OneUI 4，该系统大大改变和扩展了操作系统的功能。安全补丁可以追溯到2022年3月，使其成为相对较新的补丁。

Galaxy A13应该至少还会有一次重大更新，即Android 13，尽管不知道以后的版本是否会被支持。

三星手机传统上具有制造商自己的应用程序，包括网络浏览器和文件资源管理器，这些应用程序在某种程度上被Android's自己的版本所取代。三星的应用只能被隐藏，但不能完全删除。此外，大多数为广告目的而预装的第三方应用程序可以被删除。

通信和GNSS - 更快的Wi-Fi

在Wi-Fi模块方面，Galaxy A13 4G向前迈出了一步，现在支持Wi-Fi 5。虽然这不是最新的标准，但对于200美元以下的预算手机来说，它仍然不是一个必然的选择。我们与参考路由器华硕GT-AXE11000一起记录了超过300Mb/s的稳定传输速度，这既代表了与前代产品相比的重大改进，也代表了相对于其竞争对手的良好结果。

看一眼支持的移动通信标准，就会发现缺乏5G。然而，一个 Galaxy A13的5G版本已经在美国上市，并有可能很快在欧洲上市。在4G手机的情况下，只有最常见的频率可用。因此，可能值得看看Galaxy 智能手机是否与你计划访问的国家的国内蜂窝网络兼容。

在测试过程中，我们通过在许多地方进行测量来评估信号强度。我们的研究结果表明，Galaxy A13在接近更昂贵的智能手机的信号强度之前，往往需要花费时间，即使如此，信号强度也会偶尔下降。

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone (72.5 - 1736, n=36, last 2 years)	704 MBit/s ∼100% +115%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	328 (300^min - 339^max) MBit/s ∼47%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	299 (224^min - 315^max) MBit/s ∼42% -9%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	244 (179^min - 255^max) MBit/s ∼35% -26%
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone (78.3 - 1710, n=36, last 2 years)	716 MBit/s ∼100% +101%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	356 (293^min - 370^max) MBit/s ∼50%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	347 (309^min - 366^max) MBit/s ∼48% -3%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	339 (328^min - 362^max) MBit/s ∼47% -5%
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Average of class Smartphone (5.59 - 1395, n=236, last 2 years)	481 MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	293 (284^min - 301^max) MBit/s ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	42.9 (21^min - 65^max) MBit/s ∼9%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Average of class Smartphone (15.5 - 1348, n=236, last 2 years)	469 MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	333 (299^min - 358^max) MBit/s ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	50.4 (41^min - 57^max) MBit/s ∼11%

; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø328 (300-339)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø356 (293-370)

在我们的测试中，卫星地理定位系统通过GPS、伽利略、GLONASS和北斗进行通信。虽然卫星上行链路很快就建立起来了，但5米以内的精确度只是一般。虽然检测到的卫星不多，但Galaxy A13能够可靠地定位我们。集成的罗盘，在地图应用程序中显示观看方向，很有帮助。

由于天气不好，我们不得不在车内进行实际测试。Galaxy A13并不总是精确地将我们置于道路上，但准确度仍然不错，更适合于日常的导航使用。

电话和通话质量 - 良好的语音质量

该电话应用来自三星，因此与谷歌的股票Android 电话应用不同。虽然它在功能上非常相似，但它更注重拨号盘，而拨号盘隐藏在谷歌应用的一个额外按钮后面。

通话质量很好。我们的对话伙伴通过听筒听起来很清晰，我们的声音也能清晰地传送。环境噪音消除功能也相当可靠地工作。通过免提电话，我们对话伙伴的声音仍然清晰，尽管在这种情况下听起来有些单薄。我们也不能说得太小声，否则我们的声音就无法传到对方那里。

照相机 - 简单的广角镜头

与前代产品相比，背面的主摄像头提供了更多的百万像素和一个稍大的光圈。在像素组合模式下有1250万像素，所拍照片的分辨率也略高，尽管这在实践中不太可能有太大的区别。

用主摄像头拍摄的照片锐度一般，细节水平也是如此。在低光照条件下和高动态范围内，相机取得了相对较好的平衡，而在更大的变焦水平上，图像的清晰度明显下降。

主摄像头以高达1080p和30FPS的速度录制视频，这是这个价格类别的标准。自动亮度调节工作得很好，而自动对焦的反应可以稍微快一些。视频记录的特点是色彩适中，图像质量与竞争对手相当。

背面的500万像素广角镜头拍出的照片细节模糊不清。然而，它仍然适用于只在智能手机显示屏上观看的快照。

前面还有一个800万像素的自拍相机。虽然自拍适合于智能手机显示屏和社交媒体，但放大后会发现严重缺乏细节。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Pflanze Hauptkamera Umgebung Hauptkamera Low Light Weitwinkelkamera

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy A13 4G

Apple iPhone 13

OnePlus 9 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy A13 4G

Apple iPhone 13

OnePlus 9 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy A13 4G

Apple iPhone 13

OnePlus 9 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy A13 4G

Apple iPhone 13

OnePlus 9 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

在我们的实验室里，在受控的照明条件下，前置摄像头的锐利度是缺乏说服力的。此外，图像的对比度也很差。在低光情况下，几乎没有任何细节可以看出来。

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A13 4G: 15.27 ∆E min: 4.34 - max: 24.8 ∆E

附件和保修 - 没有更多的充电器

三星已经加入了不再随便宜的智能手机提供充电器的趋势。这应该是对环境友好的，因为大多数人被认为在家里已经有一个或多个USB充电器，而且更小的盒子可以减少运输过程中的二氧化碳排放。同时，这当然也降低了三星的成本。

因此，包装中只包括一条USB线和一个SIM卡工具。在三星的网页上，目前还没有专门针对这款智能手机的配件。

制造商提供标准的12个月保修。由于价格固定，在此期间之后维修手机也不应该是一场经济灾难。

输入设备和处理 - 带有落差的指纹传感器

触摸屏给人的感觉是光滑的，而且反应灵敏，一直到角落里。

指纹传感器位于侧面的电源按钮内。虽然它并不总是可靠地响应，但它至少允许从待机状态下解锁智能手机。进入实际的主屏幕需要相当短的时间。

面部识别也是可用的，如果需要，可以与其他生物识别认证方法一起使用。虽然通过前置摄像头进行的面部识别工作可靠，但由于缺乏红外扫描，与Apple 的Face ID相比，安全性较低。

显示屏 - 许多明亮的像素

Galaxy A13的IPS屏幕提供了一个扩展的全高清分辨率。虽然这在技术上并不是这个价格类别中的一个例外，但与前代产品相比，它是一个显著的改进。平均亮度为506尼特，它也明显更亮。刷新率被限制在60赫兹。

由于屏幕的对比度和黑值只是平均水平，在黑暗区域可以观察到灰色的色调。


493 cd/m²	524 cd/m²	497 cd/m²
481 cd/m²	553 cd/m²	485 cd/m²
490 cd/m²	539 cd/m²	493 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 553 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 506.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 553 cd/m²
Contrast: 1257:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.64 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 5.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.18

	Samsung Galaxy A13 4G PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60	Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F IPS LCD, 1600x720, 6.50	realme C35 IPS, 2408x1080, 6.60	Xiaomi Redmi 10 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50	Nokia G21 IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Screen		2%	-7%	35%	-14%
Brightness middle	553	446 -19%	585 6%	542 -2%	492 -11%
Brightness	506	423 -16%	558 10%	518 2%	484 -4%
Brightness Distribution	87	88 1%	89 2%	93 7%	86 -1%
Black Level *	0.44	0.29 34%	0.6 -36%	0.22 50%	0.46 -5%
Contrast	1257	1538 22%	975 -22%	2464 96%	1070 -15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.64	4.94 -6%	4.4 5%	3 35%	6.02 -30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.86	8.81 -12%	8.77 -12%	6.7 15%	9.13 -16%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.6	5.1 9%	5.9 -5%	1.4 75%	7.1 -27%
Gamma	2.18 ^101%	2.145 ^103%	2.228 ^99%	2.27 ^97%	2.345 ^94%
CCT	8002 ^81%	7890 ^82%	8001 ^81%	6450 ^101%	8918 ^73%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

尽管我们没有检测到PWM，但我们的CalMAN软件的灰度显示了明显的蓝色色调。相对于竞争对手来说，颜色的准确性很好，在最佳设置下的屏幕和打印的颜色之间的差异，肉眼不应该看到。然而，更昂贵的选择往往会在色彩准确性方面提供重大升级。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 27 ms rise
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

虽然这款智能手机在户外仍可使用，但用户应坚持在阴凉处使用，因为反射和眩光会阻碍阳光直射下的视野。

虽然由于采用了IPS技术，可视角度非常好，但从极端角度观看屏幕时，在黑暗区域可以观察到微弱的红色纱幕。

性能 -Galaxy 性能较弱的手机

前辈的一个版本。 Galaxy A12已经使用了三星Exynos 850.后者是2019年推出的带有8个核心的SoC，采用8纳米工艺生产。与同价位手机的性能比较显示。Galaxy A13 4G在处理能力方面落后。而小米红米10位居榜首，但即使是诺基亚G21和Realme C35也能提供明显更快的性能。

在日常使用中，一些要求较高的应用程序需要尝试启动或根本不启动，用户应避免过度的多任务处理，以防止性能陷入停顿。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 1755, n=262, last 2 years)	649 Points ∼100% +319%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	365 Points ∼56% +135%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	312 Points ∼48% +101%
realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	298 Points ∼46% +92%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	178 Points ∼27% +15%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (155 - 183, n=5)	175.2 Points ∼27% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	155 Points ∼24%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Smartphone (248 - 4914, n=262, last 2 years)	2142 Points ∼100% +266%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1265 Points ∼59% +116%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	1185 Points ∼55% +102%
realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	1184 Points ∼55% +102%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	1087 Points ∼51% +85%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (586 - 1087, n=5)	944 Points ∼44% +61%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	586 Points ∼27%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (111952 - 1041980, n=100, last 2 years)	547376 Points ∼100% +306%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	134832 Points ∼25%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (121238 - 134832, n=3)	129282 Points ∼24% -4%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (4436 - 18567, n=131, last 2 years)	10125 Points ∼100% +104%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	8842 Points ∼87% +78%
realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	8066 Points ∼80% +62%
Nokia G21 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	7805 Points ∼77% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	5739 Points ∼57% +16%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (4966 - 6065, n=3)	5590 Points ∼55% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	4966 Points ∼49%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (226 - 1169, n=43, last 2 years)	743 Points ∼100% +193%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	254 Points ∼34%
Average Samsung Exynos 850	254 Points ∼34% 0%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (895 - 8124, n=179, last 2 years)	4144 Points ∼100% +160%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2247 Points ∼54% +41%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	1637 Points ∼40% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (1533 - 1644, n=5)	1599 Points ∼39% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	1594 Points ∼38%
System
Average of class Smartphone (1542 - 19657, n=179, last 2 years)	7360 Points ∼100% +137%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	4065 Points ∼55% +31%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	3345 Points ∼45% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (3042 - 3382, n=5)	3239 Points ∼44% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	3112 Points ∼42%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone (1012 - 9044, n=179, last 2 years)	4780 Points ∼100% +174%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	3204 Points ∼67% +84%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	1836 Points ∼38% +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (1533 - 1904, n=5)	1780 Points ∼37% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	1744 Points ∼36%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (478 - 25642, n=179, last 2 years)	7046 Points ∼100% +470%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1878 Points ∼27% +52%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	1263 Points ∼18% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	1237 Points ∼18%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (1159 - 1263, n=5)	1219 Points ∼17% -1%
Web
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 2392, n=179, last 2 years)	1374 Points ∼100% +48%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1042 Points ∼76% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	947 Points ∼69% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (893 - 990, n=5)	931 Points ∼68% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	930 Points ∼68%

AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Smartphone (4293 - 286905, n=120, last 2 years)	63713 Points ∼100% +1363%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	7120 Points ∼11% +64%
realme C35 UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	4725 Points ∼7% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	4453 Points ∼7% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (4354 - 4453, n=3)	4411 Points ∼7% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	4354 Points ∼7%

相比之下，图形性能不相上下。然而，小米10的额外图形核心小米红米10在一些情况下显示了它的能力。

3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	182 Points ∼100% +31%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	139 Points ∼76%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	129 Points ∼71% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	116 Points ∼64% -17%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	111 Points ∼61% -20%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	721 Points ∼100% +42%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	509 Points ∼71%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	464 Points ∼64% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	426 Points ∼59% -16%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	393 Points ∼55% -23%
Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	712 Points ∼100% +39%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	513 Points ∼72%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	463 Points ∼65% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	428 Points ∼60% -17%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	397 Points ∼56% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2628 Points ∼100% +21%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2298 Points ∼87% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2203 Points ∼84% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2177 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2098 Points ∼80% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1264 Points ∼100% +58%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	919 Points ∼73% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	839 Points ∼66% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	799 Points ∼63%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	783 Points ∼62% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1396 Points ∼100% +50%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1074 Points ∼77% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	954 Points ∼68% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	930 Points ∼67%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	917 Points ∼66% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3036 Points ∼100% +48%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2559 Points ∼84% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2427 Points ∼80% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2109 Points ∼69% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2054 Points ∼68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1265 Points ∼100% +60%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	939 Points ∼74% +19%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	814 Points ∼64% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	791 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	736 Points ∼58% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1416 Points ∼100% +55%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1109 Points ∼78% +21%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	959 Points ∼68% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	916 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	867 Points ∼61% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2957 Points ∼100% +55%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2400 Points ∼81% +26%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2336 Points ∼79% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2048 Points ∼69% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1912 Points ∼65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1709 Points ∼100% +45%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1471 Points ∼86% +25%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1236 Points ∼72% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1179 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1126 Points ∼66% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1817 Points ∼100% +41%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1656 Points ∼91% +28%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1385 Points ∼76% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1289 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1283 Points ∼71% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1394 Points ∼100% +57%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1103 Points ∼79% +24%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	945 Points ∼68% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	888 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	863 Points ∼62% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1250 Points ∼100% +62%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	935 Points ∼75% +21%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	806 Points ∼64% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	771 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	738 Points ∼59% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2959 Points ∼100% +56%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2379 Points ∼80% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2339 Points ∼79% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2031 Points ∼69% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1899 Points ∼64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1833 Points ∼100% +42%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1710 Points ∼93% +32%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1414 Points ∼77% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1295 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1273 Points ∼69% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1713 Points ∼100% +46%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1518 Points ∼89% +29%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1255 Points ∼73% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1175 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1142 Points ∼67% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3063 Points ∼100% +52%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2546 Points ∼83% +26%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2426 Points ∼79% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2032 Points ∼66% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2015 Points ∼66%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	42 fps ∼100% +91%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	33 fps ∼79% +50%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps ∼55% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps ∼52%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	46 fps ∼100% +84%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps ∼57% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	25 fps ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	24 fps ∼52% -4%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	28 fps ∼100% +100%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	18 fps ∼64% +29%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps ∼50% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps ∼50%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	25 fps ∼100% +56%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	16 fps ∼64% 0%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps ∼64% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	16 fps ∼64%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	19 fps ∼100% +132%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps ∼68% +59%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.7 fps ∼46% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.2 fps ∼43%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	16 fps ∼100% +70%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.9 fps ∼62% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9.4 fps ∼59% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9.4 fps ∼59%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps ∼100% +116%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9.1 fps ∼83% +78%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5.1 fps ∼46%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5 fps ∼45% -2%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9.6 fps ∼100% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.1 fps ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6 fps ∼63% -2%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.9 fps ∼61% -3%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7 fps ∼100% +112%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6 fps ∼86% +82%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5.9 fps ∼84% +79%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.4 fps ∼49% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3.3 fps ∼47%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3.5 fps ∼100% +59%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2.2 fps ∼63% 0%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.2 fps ∼63% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2.2 fps ∼63%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2 fps ∼57% -9%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps ∼100% +108%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9.5 fps ∼86% +79%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9 fps ∼82% +70%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.4 fps ∼49% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5.3 fps ∼48%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9.7 fps ∼100% +59%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.2 fps ∼64% +2%
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.1 fps ∼63% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.1 fps ∼63%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5.2 fps ∼54% -15%

浏览网页也发现了相当低的系统性能。图片需要很长的时间来加载，用户体验偶尔会出现滞后。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182.6, n=176, last 2 years)	59.7 Points ∼100% +168%
realme C35 (Chrome 101)	45.399 Points ∼76% +104%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	28.58 Points ∼48% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101)	22.283 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)	21.24 Points ∼36% -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (18.4 - 22.3, n=5)	19.9 Points ∼33% -11%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=161, last 2 years)	59 runs/min ∼100% +253%
realme C35	34.44 runs/min ∼58% +106%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	24.4 runs/min ∼41% +46%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chome 101)	16.73 runs/min ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)	16.3 runs/min ∼28% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (15 - 16.7, n=5)	15.8 runs/min ∼27% -6%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 265, n=188, last 2 years)	89.7 Points ∼100% +130%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	48 Points ∼54% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101)	39 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)	38 Points ∼42% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (35 - 39, n=5)	36.4 Points ∼41% -7%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=192, last 2 years)	22121 Points ∼100% +275%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	10625 Points ∼48% +80%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101)	5904 Points ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)	5849 Points ∼26% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (4875 - 5904, n=5)	5333 Points ∼24% -10%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (8327 - 9397, n=5)	8925 ms * ∼100% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)	8472 ms * ∼95% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101)	8326.9 ms * ∼93%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	3706 ms * ∼42% +55%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 15230, n=194, last 2 years)	3285 ms * ∼37% +61%

* ... smaller is better

说到存储，三星使用了相当慢的eMMC闪存。这导致加载时间稍长，并没有完全提高响应速度。这款手机 Realme C35的UFS存储是一个更快的选择。

	Samsung Galaxy A13 4G	Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F	realme C35	Xiaomi Redmi 10	Nokia G21	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-32%	112%	4%	-20%	-34%	112%
Sequential Read 256KB	308.5	302.3 -2%	907.1 194%	321.3 4%	257.6 -16%	273 ?(95.6 - 704, n=186) -12%	891 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=259, last 2 years) 189%
Sequential Write 256KB	236.8	74.5 -69%	271.1 14%	178 -25%	180.6 -24%	176.3 ?(40 - 274, n=186) -26%	430 ?(11.9 - 1465, n=259, last 2 years) 82%
Random Read 4KB	104.4	77.8 -25%	137.8 32%	100.7 -4%	74 -29%	58.8 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=186) -44%	158.3 ?(13.5 - 325, n=259, last 2 years) 52%
Random Write 4KB	67.3	47.21 -30%	206.4 207%	95.8 42%	60.2 -11%	30.7 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=186) -54%	151 ?(5.5 - 449, n=259, last 2 years) 124%

游戏 - 入门级游戏

虽然Galaxy A13当然不是一款适合硬核游戏玩家的智能手机，但休闲的、要求不高的游戏玩家应该会比较满意。在快节奏的射击游戏Armajet中，我们达到了可观的30至35FPS。

要求更高的3D游戏《PUBG Mobile》是一个不同的故事。在20FPS左右时有非常明显的卡顿现象。这使得快速枪战变得很困难，即使是在抑制预期的情况下。我们使用GameBench软件来记录游戏中的帧率。

在我们的测试中，陀螺仪和触摸屏控制工作完美无缺，没有任何掉线。

; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø33.2 (24-40)

; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.9.0: Ø24.4 (17-32)

; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.9.0: Ø21.3 (13-29)

排放--没有供热发展的烦恼

温度

智能手机在负载下的最大热量发展是一个惊喜。在室温下，我们测量的峰值为37.6℃（99.68°F）。

但这是否也意味着SoC不会节流？根据3DMark Wild Life压力测试的结果，是的。在循环运行相同的测试20次后，最坏的情况是有一个小的性能赤字。

Max. Load

Idle


34.3 °C	30.2 °C	29.7 °C
34.8 °C	30.8 °C	29.9 °C
34.7 °C	31 °C	29.8 °C

Maximum: 34.8 °C
Average: 31.7 °C


30 °C	31.7 °C	35.1 °C
30.7 °C	32.8 °C	37.8 °C
30.7 °C	33.2 °C	37.6 °C

Maximum: 37.8 °C
Average: 33.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 37.9 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	99.3 (3.06^min) % ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	99.2 (2.57^min) % ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	98.2 (4.26^min) % ∼99% -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash	98.9 (1.09^min) % ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	97.2 (0.827^min) % ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash	96.1 (0.701^min) % ∼97% -1%

Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø0.84 (0.827-0.851)

Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø0.708 (0.701-0.73)

Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø1.096 (1.09-1.102)

Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.07 (3.06-3.08)

Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.59 (2.57-2.59)

Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.32 (4.26-4.34)

演讲者

智能手机底部边缘的扬声器提供了一个体面的最大音量水平和良好的整体声音。在最大音量下，它至少不会过度强调高音，使其很适合偶尔的音乐播放。

也就是说，我们建议使用外部扬声器或耳机来获得真正愉快的音频体验。它们可以通过3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙5.0连接。然而，只支持aptX编解码器的基本版本。用户将不得不使用SBC、AAC、LDAC和三星自己的可扩展编解码器。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy A13 4G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Nokia G21 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

能源管理 - 15瓦的充电

能源消耗

Galaxy A13在空转时比较经济，在负载时也不会消耗过多的电力。

充电率被限制在15瓦，导致充电时间超过两个小时，这取决于电池水平。由于Galaxy A13不包括充电器，用户将不得不使用现有的USB适配器或单独购买一个。不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.9 / 1.6 / 2.1 Watt
Load	3.6 / 5.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Samsung Galaxy A13 4G 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 10 5000 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 850	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-17%	-1%	-18%	-12%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	1.4 -56%	0.53 41%	1.22 ?(0.9 - 1.5, n=5) -36%	0.915 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=206, last 2 years) -2%
Idle Average *	1.6	1.9 -19%	2.01 -26%	1.82 ?(1.6 - 2.1, n=5) -14%	1.702 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=206, last 2 years) -6%
Idle Maximum *	2.1	2.1 -0%	2.02 4%	2.42 ?(2.1 - 2.9, n=5) -15%	1.931 ?(0.69 - 4, n=206, last 2 years) 8%
Load Average *	3.6	3.8 -6%	4.11 -14%	4.06 ?(3.6 - 4.6, n=5) -13%	4.47 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=206, last 2 years) -24%
Load Maximum *	5.3	5.6 -6%	5.76 -9%	5.94 ?(5.3 - 6.6, n=5) -12%	7.33 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=206, last 2 years) -38%

* ... smaller is better

Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)

: Ø3.14 (1.356-5.22)

Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)

; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.88 (2.76-3.77)

; Idle 1min: Ø1.857 (1.4-2.12)

电池寿命

在电池和充电技术方面，与Galaxy A13的前辈相比，没有任何变化。仅仅由于显示屏的分辨率更高，运行时间可能会略微缩短，不过在日常使用中应该没有什么区别。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，差异仅有15分钟，总共14:24小时，三星Galaxy A13仍然提供良好的运行时间。

虽然在正常使用过程中，一次电池充电可以持续一整天，没有任何问题，但也有一些智能手机的耐力明显更强。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		36h 04min
WiFi Websurfing		14h 24min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		17h 34min
Load (maximum brightness)		7h 17min

	Samsung Galaxy A13 4G 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F 5000 mAh	realme C35 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 10 5000 mAh	Nokia G21 5050 mAh
Battery Runtime		1%	11%	-5%	26%
Reader / Idle	2164	2094 -3%		2356 9%
H.264	1054	1078 2%		1002 -5%
WiFi v1.3	864	879 2%	958 11%	858 -1%	1087 26%
Load	437	455 4%		341 -22%

Pros

+ 明亮、高分辨率的屏幕

+ 快速的Wi-Fi

+ 良好的通话质量

+ 没有PWM

+ 几乎没有任何发热现象

Cons

- 性能弱

- 非常基本的外壳

- 对4G的支持仅限于最常见的频率

结论--升级不错，但性能欠佳

三星的入门级主张，即 Galaxy A12，一直急需升级，以防止竞争对手将三星挤出这个价格段。Galaxy A13的Wi-Fi速度明显加快，屏幕更亮，分辨率更高，而且支持NFC，而这并不是所有竞争设备的标准配置，它提供了各种改进。

虽然你不应该指望一个200美元以下的手机有峰值的相机性能，但相对于它的价格级别，Galaxy A13的表现不错，用相机拍摄的照片可以看起来相当不错。

谈到外壳的外观和感觉，其他制造商的许多预算设备往往提供更多的东西，而且Galaxy A13，它使用与前代产品相同的SoC，也不完全是一个顶级的表现。

三星入门级智能手机的良好升级。Galaxy A13与竞争对手持平，尽管性能偏弱。

总的来说，如果你预算有限或需要一款基本的智能手机，Galaxy A13是值得考虑的。如果你能稍微拉长你的预算（并为欧盟的潜在买家多等一会儿），那么 Galaxy A13的5G版本具有更快的性能，可能值得仔细看看。另外，小米红米10是另一个强有力的竞争者，在高分辨率显示屏的基础上提供90-Hz刷新率，价格也差不多。

价格和可用性

三星Galaxy A13 4G 32GB可以直接从三星。购买，价格为189.99美元。另外，该智能手机在亚马逊，售价约为165美元。售价约为165美元。

Samsung Galaxy A13 4G - 2022-05-10 05/10/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

78%

Keyboard

65 / 75 → 87%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

45 / 70 → 64%

Weight

88%

Battery

90%

Display

85%

Games Performance

10 / 64 → 16%

Application Performance

55 / 86 → 64%

Temperature

93%

Noise

100%

Audio

68 / 90 → 76%

Camera

50%

Average

71%

77%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Linked Articles

Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Galaxy A Series)

Review

•

三星Galaxy A12 Exynos评论。新的SoC是否使...

Review

•

三星Galaxy A03s智能手机评论。便宜的手机，良好的通话质量

Review

•

三星Galaxy A22 4G智能手机评测 - AMOLED...

Review

•

三星Galaxy A22 5G智能手机评论。这款经济型5G手...

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 319 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 232897 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy A13 4G智能手机评论--三星预算手机的慷慨升级

Florian Schmitt, 2022-05-12 (Update: 2022-05-12)