Notebookcheck Logo
OnePlus 15 评测

OnePlus 15 智能手机评测--游戏速度达 165fps,尽管比前代产品慢一些

性能问题。

OnePlus 15 的外观非常时尚,价格也比其他高端智能手机便宜一些。能够在游戏中提供高达 165fps 的速度是以略微缩水的相机系统为代价的,而且我们在测试中还遇到了一些性能问题。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android ARM Smartphone

结论 - OnePlus 15

尽管从 OnePlus 15 的规格来看,它并不打算成为 Oppo 的旗舰拍照手机,但它仍能拍出不错的照片。

它的主要重点是性能,其设计旨在不受任何人为限制地运行。但缺点是,这会导致手机过热和关机。此外,在持续负载的情况下,手机会出现明显的跳动。尽管如此,它的骁龙 8 精英 5 代意味着你不必担心应用程序或游戏会耗尽电量。

机身质量非常高,缎面处理的边框给人一种特别高级的感觉。

由于采用了双电池设计,7,300 毫安时的大容量电池也已进入欧洲市场。虽然 OnePlus 15 的电池续航时间并不尽如人意,但与前代产品相比仍有显著提升。

由于采用了专用的触摸控制芯片,屏幕显示动作非常流畅,手机的反应也非常灵敏。

不过,用户将不得不忍受 PWM 闪烁,因此对此类问题敏感的人应该先试用一下屏幕,然后再掏钱购买。

低于 1000 美元的价格使 OnePlus 15 对预算有限的用户很有吸引力,对他们来说,摄像头并不是最关键的因素。

Pros

+ 设计时尚
+ 价格相对低廉(尤其是进口产品)
+ 明亮的显示屏
+ 游戏速度高达 165 fps
+ 反应灵敏的触摸屏
+ 防水
+ 良好的摄像系统
+ 强大的扬声器
+ 电池寿命长
+ 120 瓦快速充电
+ 接收良好的世界电话
+ 精确的 GPS
+ 6 年更新

Cons

- 性能问题,严重节流
- 机箱温度很高
- 能效一般
- 摄像头系统简陋
- 显示屏有 PWM 闪烁
- Wi-Fi 性能一般
- 无 UWB
- 中国进口产品不支持 eSIM 卡
- 弯曲时有轻微吱吱声
- 后盖部分为塑料而非玻璃
- 充电器仅随中文版附送

价格和供应情况

目前,直接从制造商处购买售价 999 美元的智能手机https://www.oneplus.com/us/oneplus-15?_gl=1*dmm33z*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTUxMDA4Nzk1OS4xNzY0MTY1Nzk0*_ga_2JD4LD71G7*czE3NjQxNjU3OTMkbzEkZzAkdDE3NjQxNjU3OTMkajYwJGwwJGgxMzgyODIyMjU3还可获赠 OnePlus Watch3。

不过,从中国进口该设备可以为您节省更多费用:如果从我们的租赁合作伙伴TradingShenzhen 购买,起价为 632 美元。

OnePlus 创立之初就具有革命性意义:价格明显低于同类产品,但设备齐全,做工精良。此外,他们始终关心社区的意见,并将反馈意见落实到未来的机型中。

然而,OnePlus 目前的机型已不再符合这一传奇声誉。部分原因是该品牌不得不在内部将自己与其姊妹公司Oppo的智能手机区分开来,在这方面往往做得不够好。

尽管如此,OnePlus 15 再次成为一款令人兴奋的智能手机,它的价格比其他高端手机略低,但配置仍然不错。

规格

OnePlus 15
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 8 x 3.6 - 4.6 GHz
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
Display
6.78 inch 20:9, 2772 x 1272 pixel 450 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 165 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 486 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: gyroscope, proximity, compass, barometer
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B30/​B32/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B48/​B66/​B71), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n13/​n20/​n25/​n26/​n28/​n30/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n48/​n66/​n71/​n75/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 161.4 x 76.7
Battery
7300 mAh Lithium-Ion, 120W wired charging (Oppo 120W SuperVOOC), 50W wireless charging (Oppo 50W AirVOOC), 10W wireless reverse charging, 5W wired reverse charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase shift AF, Laser AF, Contrast AF, OIS, Dual-LED flash, Videos @4320p/​30fps (camera 1); 50.0MP, f/​2.8, phase shift AF, OIS, 3.5x optical Zoom, periscope (Camera 2); 50.0MP, f/​2.0, phaseshift AF, wide angle lens (Camera3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.4, Videos @2160p/​60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), silicone bumper, SIM needle, USB cable, charger (not in Europe), 12 Months Warranty, IP68/​IP69 certified, eSIM, fanless, waterproof
Weight
215 g
Price
999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

表壳 - 哑光陶瓷涂层

说到手机壳,OnePlus 试图开辟自己的道路,同时也明显受到了智能手机巨头Apple 的启发:圆润的屏幕边角、操作按钮的位置和印花天线可能会让经验不足的用户误以为自己拿的是来自加利福尼亚而不是深圳的手机。

不过,由于采用了磨砂表面,该机的设计也很独特:OnePlus 采用了一种名为 "微电弧氧化"(Micro-Arc Oxidation)的工艺,在金属边框和摄像头模块上都留下了一层陶瓷保护层。

遗憾的是,这种表面处理只适用于 "沙暴 "配色,我们只能测试这种配色。不过,选择这种颜色意味着你必须接受背面由玻璃纤维增强塑料制成的事实。相比之下,"无限黑 "和 "紫罗兰 "版本则采用了玻璃后壳。

这款手机很坚固,但我们在试图扭动它时听到了非常微弱的吱吱声,这在这个价位的手机中是不应该出现的。它具有 IP68/IP69 防水和防尘功能。

正面的显示屏边框非常薄,屏幕保护由现代大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 提供。

尺寸比较

162.9 mm 76.5 mm 8.5 mm 213 g162.8 mm 77.6 mm 8.2 mm 218 g162.9 mm 77.6 mm 8 mm 219 g161.3 mm 76.5 mm 8.3 mm 224 g161.4 mm 76.7 mm 8.2 mm 215 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - 超快内存

数据吞吐量高达 5 Mbps 的 USB 3.1 Gen 1 端口和 DisplayPort 是高端手机的标准配置,OnePlus 15 在这方面也不负众望。附带的红外线端口是一大亮点,可用来控制电视等设备。虽然不包括用于轻松发现设备的 UWB,但蓝牙 6.0 提供了类似的功能。

NFC 允许移动支付和读取标签或身份证。

OnePlus 15 有两种存储配置可供选择:

  • OnePlus 15 256 GB UFS 4.1 闪存、12 GB LPDDR5X Ultra 内存
  • OnePlus 15 512 GB UFS 4.1 闪存、16 GB LPDDR5X Ultra+ 内存

OnePlus 成功地将更大存储空间机型的内存速度提升到了更高水平。目前,两种存储容量之间的差价约为 50 美元。

该机没有 microSD 卡插槽,虽然进口机型不支持 eSIM,但欧洲机型支持,甚至支持两个 eSIM 配置文件。

顶部:扬声器、红外热像仪
顶部:扬声器、红外热像仪
底部扬声器、麦克风、USB-C 端口、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽
底部扬声器、麦克风、USB-C 端口、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽
右侧音量摇杆、待机键
右侧音量摇杆、待机键
左:操作按钮
左:操作按钮

软件 - 6 年更新

中国的贷方 TradingShenzhen 为我们提供的评测机预装了 ColorOS,而不是全球通用的 OxygenOS。

两者之间的差异并不大;例如,使用中文 ROM 可以选择欧洲语言,Android Auto 也应该可以使用。不过,经过大量测试,TradingShenzhen 现在提供预装 OxygenOS 的进口机型。

两个软件版本的主要区别在于没有预装中文应用程序,谷歌服务也无需单独激活。这两个操作系统反应都很灵敏,使用起来也很直观。它们都配备了出色的图库应用程序,具有全面的 AI 编辑选项和多种设置。不过,在 OxygenOS 中还会发现一些小的翻译错误(德语)。

据悉,OnePlus 15 将获得六年的安全更新和四个主要的Android 更新。根据EPREL 数据库,我们可以期待至少 5 年的更新。这个时间太短,不符合欧盟的规定,所以我们很想知道欧盟会如何严格处理这个问题。

OnePlus 13 软件(ColorOS)
OnePlus 13 软件(ColorOS)
OnePlus 13 软件(ColorOS)
OnePlus 13 软件(ColorOS)

可持续性

OnePlus 为其智能手机提供维修手册和备件,使用户能够自己进行维修。根据EPREL 数据库,其可维修性被评为 B 级,是第二高的等级。维修费用也可以提前查看。

根据制造商的网站,该手机 90% 以上可回收,但没有提供有关所用回收材料的信息。此外,也没有关于其碳足迹的信息。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 世界电话

支持现代 WiFi 7,但我们的华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器只支持 WiFi 6E。这样就可以通过较不拥堵的 6 GHz 频段进行连接。

在我们的测试中,OnePlus 15 的传输速度一般,而其他智能手机,包括它的前代产品,传输速度更快。OnePlus 15 可以轻松实现千兆级网络连接,但任何依赖自己网络中更高速度的人都会很快发现自己的极限。

OnePlus 15 的中国进口版和欧洲版都是真正的全球通用手机,几乎可以连接到世界上任何地方的移动网络。正如我们在分析过程中进行的几次现场测试(包括在狭窄的街道上)所证明的那样,即使在具有挑战性的情况下,接收效果也非常出色。

Networking
OnePlus 15
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
536 (min: 375) MBit/s ∼30%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1401 (min: 1217) MBit/s ∼86%
OnePlus 13
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
820 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
791 (min: 705) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1791 (min: 1704) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1464 (min: 769) MBit/s ∼90%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
932 (min: 738) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1461 (min: 1265) MBit/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1806 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1494 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1747 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1483 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼92%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
956 (min: 795) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1609 (min: 1520) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
933 (min: 846) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1620 (min: 1407) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
937 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1088 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1258 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1445 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
712 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
739 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1337 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1399 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼86%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500Tooltip
OnePlus 15; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø536 (375-595)
OnePlus 15; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1401 (1217-1518)
GPS 室外测试
GPS 室外测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

在户外,OnePlus 15 很快就能将我们的位置精确到几米之内。所有主要的卫星系统都可用于定位,但遗憾的是,该设备没有 SBAS,因此无法获得更高的精确度。

我们的目标是在自行车旅行的实际情况下测试定位。此外,我们还使用了定位非常准确的智能手表 Garmin Venu 2。

两款设备计算出的距离完全相同,OnePlus 15 准确地显示了我们的路线。在桥上,我们的位置与实际路线偏离了几米,但总的来说,这款手机非常适合导航和位置跟踪。

OnePlus 15 定位 - 概述
OnePlus 15 定位 - 概述
OnePlus 15 定位 - 转折点
OnePlus 15 定位 - 转折点
OnePlus 15 定位 - 桥接
OnePlus 15 定位 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 定位系统 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位系统 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位系统 - 桥接器
Garmin Venu 2 定位系统 - 桥接器

电话功能和语音质量 - 清晰响亮

如果你使用的是中国的 ColorOS,你就有自己专用的手机应用,而 OxygenOS 则使用谷歌的手机应用。OnePlus 应用程序甚至可以检测来电者的声音是否是人工智能生成的。

听筒的通话质量非常好,我们在测试通话中也能清晰地听到对方的声音。通过免提电话和免提麦克风的通话效果也很好,不过降噪功能还有待改进。

相机 - 哈苏,再见!

前置摄像头图像
前置摄像头图像

OnePlus 15 的相机系统已经缩减,哈苏合作关系也已取消。为了在内部与 OPPO Find X9 Pro,它所采用的感光传感器也略有减少。

不过,5,000 万像素的主摄像头拍摄出的照片非常出色,可以轻松放大。照片既细腻又色彩准确。即使在弱光和高对比度的环境下,照片的细节还原依然很强,只有在暗部才会丢失一些细节。

视频录制速度高达 8K,每秒 30 帧。在 4K 下,甚至可以实现高达 120fps 的慢动作效果,而且图像质量非常好。

长焦摄像头配备了潜望式变焦。它同样拥有 5000 万像素的分辨率,与主摄像头相比,光学变焦达到了 7 倍。以最大光学变焦拍摄的照片仍然非常细腻。

超广角摄像头也具有 5000 万像素的分辨率,但在较远距离拍摄的快照几乎看不出细节。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

PlantEnvironmentLow lightWide-angle camera
orginal image
click to load images

我们希望在全棚照明下能看到更清晰的图像,但在仅有 1 勒克斯照明的情况下,拍摄对象依然清晰可辨。

ColorChecker
6.8 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
11 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 15: 6.69 ∆E min: 2.07 - max: 11.01 ∆E
ColorChecker
16.5 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
12 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 15: 12.11 ∆E min: 5.78 - max: 19.31 ∆E

配件和保修 - 欧洲无充电器

OnePlus 15 在中国配有充电器,但在欧洲没有。OnePlus 传统上提供各种配件,如时尚保护套和充电线。

在欧洲购买的 OnePlus 手机享有 24 个月的 保修。.TradingShenzhen 允许通过德国地址处理中国进口设备的保修申请。

输入设备和操作 - 专用触摸控制器

据说触摸屏对触摸输入的响应速度高达每秒 3200 次。这是通过定制设计的芯片实现的,因此 OnePlus 15 确实给人感觉非常快、反应灵敏。

指纹传感器位于屏幕下方,但位置异常高。在实际使用中,这证明是非常方便的,因为你无需调整手的位置。左右手用户也同样可以轻松操作,即使是小手用户也不会有任何问题。

人脸识别功能也可以实现,但只能通过前置摄像头进行二维扫描。

键盘肖像
键盘肖像
键盘景观
键盘景观

显示屏 - 明亮、快速,但使用 PWM

子像素图像
子像素图像

该显示屏的分辨率略低于前代产品,但显示图像的频率高达 165 Hz。不过,这只适用于经过特别调整的游戏,否则最高只能达到 120 Hz。

日常情况下的最大亮度约为 1,100 cd/m²,在同类产品中属于典型水平。在小范围内,我们测得的亮度约为 1,434 cd/m²。据说在观看 HDR 内容时,某些区域的亮度可达 1,800 cd/m²。这是个不错的成绩,但还谈不上破纪录。

色彩还原非常准确,肉眼感觉不到任何偏差。

我们测量到的 PWM 闪烁适应了 120 Hz 的刷新率,这有助于减少干扰。PWM 速率还可以在选项中提高,以缓解任何此类问题。

1118
cd/m²
1112
cd/m²
1105
cd/m²
1116
cd/m²
1114
cd/m²
1095
cd/m²
1120
cd/m²
1116
cd/m²
1084
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1120 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1108.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1114 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.33 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.273
CCT: 6708 K
OnePlus 15
AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8"
OnePlus 13
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"
Oppo Find X9 Pro
LTPO AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9"
Screen
13%
8%
-34%
5%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1114
1155
4%
1105
-1%
1357
22%
1099
-1%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1109
1155
4%
1084
-2%
1350
22%
1067
-4%
Brightness Distribution (%)
97
98
1%
95
-2%
94
-3%
95
-2%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.33
1
25%
1.02
23%
3.1
-133%
1.05
21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.42
1.8
26%
2.32
4%
4.7
-94%
2.38
2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.9
1.6
16%
1.4
26%
2.2
-16%
1.7
11%
Gamma
2.273 97%
2.3 96%
2.244 98%
2 110%
2.232 99%
CCT
6708 97%
6503 100%
6411 101%
6391 102%
6779 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 15 %

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8142 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

以固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平缓,但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看)。

卡尔曼灰阶
卡尔曼灰阶
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.5 ms rise
↘ 1.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

明亮的屏幕在户外也能轻松阅读,即使在大视角下也能保持显示清晰。

室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 速度快,但有节流问题

OnePlus 15 配备了全新的高通 骁龙 8 精英 5 代图形处理器,使其成为目前速度最快的 SoC 之一。然而,我们在其他智能手机上的观察表明,它并不总能充分发挥潜力,在紧凑型智能手机的机身内发热过快,无法充分散热。

OnePlus 15 似乎在这方面有特别的问题,它甚至落后于其前代产品 OnePlus 13。 一加 13、在几乎所有基准测试中都落后于前代产品 OnePlus 13。在非常大的负载下,一些基准测试甚至会崩溃,例如我们使用 Burnout 基准进行的温度监测测试或压力测试。不过,在我们运行高要求应用程序或游戏的测试中,SoC 仍然保持稳定。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (3498 - 3831, n=6)
3660 Points +5%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
3640 Points +4%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
3511 Points 0%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
3498 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3200 Points -9%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3087 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=213, last 2 years)
1751 Points -50%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (10620 - 12383, n=6)
11154 Points +5%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
10645 Points
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
10620 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
10378 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10020 Points -6%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9369 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11634, n=213, last 2 years)
5118 Points -52%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
2981365 Points +21%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2762122 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (2390211 - 3269237, n=5)
2645053 Points +8%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2456231 Points
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2390211 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2262067 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3269237, n=154, last 2 years)
1481183 Points -40%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (19432 - 28557, n=5)
21700 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
20764 Points +5%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
19833 Points 0%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
19802 Points
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
19793 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 28557, n=190, last 2 years)
14814 Points -25%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
13977 Points -29%
CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2485 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2354 Points +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1698 - 2495, n=5)
2170 Points +28%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1858 Points +9%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1698 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=130, last 2 years)
1139 Points -33%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (12929 - 16690, n=5)
14136 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
13325 Points +2%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
13002 Points
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
12929 Points -1%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
10937 Points -16%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
10756 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 16690, n=149, last 2 years)
7680 Points -41%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (18137 - 21153, n=5)
19389 Points +1%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
19202 Points
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
18137 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17171 Points -11%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
15554 Points -19%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
14039 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 21153, n=149, last 2 years)
11422 Points -41%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17355 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (13505 - 24052, n=5)
17348 Points +14%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
15236 Points
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
13505 Points -11%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11536 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 24052, n=149, last 2 years)
8705 Points -43%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
8243 Points -46%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (52356 - 61797, n=5)
54484 Points +3%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
53231 Points +1%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
52659 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
48863 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
45562 Points -13%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
43637 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=149, last 2 years)
26041 Points -51%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2322 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (2143 - 2468, n=5)
2265 Points +2%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2221 Points
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2143 Points -4%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
2109 Points -5%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2091 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2468, n=149, last 2 years)
1701 Points -23%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
23281 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (22372 - 23712, n=5)
22989 Points +1%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
22767 Points 0%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
22665 Points
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
22372 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3769 - 81594, n=138, last 2 years)
19960 Points -12%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
16866 Points -26%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=127, last 2 years)
27205 Points +1321%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1982 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1923 Points 0%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1915 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1455 - 2381, n=4)
1885 Points -2%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1455 Points -24%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5210, n=52, last 2 years)
841 Points +28%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
655 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (524 - 698, n=5)
613 Points -6%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
524 Points -20%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
192 Points -71%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=52, last 2 years)
3851 Points +667%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (486 - 676, n=5)
577 Points +15%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
502 Points
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
486 Points -3%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
176 Points -65%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=52, last 2 years)
5504 Points +438%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (974 - 1498, n=5)
1196 Points +17%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1023 Points
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
974 Points -5%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
436 Points -57%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3334, n=43, last 2 years)
884 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
240 Points
Score V6
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
14336 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1098 - 22149, n=4)
12199 Points +9%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
11212 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10621 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55.6 - 22149, n=73, last 2 years)
4497 Points -60%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
765 Points -93%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
734 Points -93%

图形性能也凸显了 SoC 无法充分发挥其潜力。不过,制造商和高通公司可能会通过打补丁来改善这一问题。不过,所有类型的手机游戏都可以在这款显卡上运行,而且这种情况应该会持续几年。

在技术上,它几乎拥有你想要的一切。从光线追踪和网格着色到磁贴内存堆,许多当前的游戏技术都一应俱全。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
7198 Points +3%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6985 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6907 Points -1%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6789 Points -3%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
6168 Points -12%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
7167 Points +3%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6969 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6845 Points -2%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6754 Points -3%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
6289 Points -10%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26614 Points +3%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
25978 Points 0%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
25885 Points
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25785 Points 0%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
23088 Points -11%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
14788 Points +18%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
12546 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12395 Points -1%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11821 Points -6%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
10958 Points -13%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
14635 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12711 Points +1%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
12559 Points
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11879 Points -5%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
10886 Points -13%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3198 Points +11%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2886 Points
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2567 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2397 Points -17%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3211 Points +12%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2871 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2651 Points -8%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2599 Points -9%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
954 fps +25%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
768 fps +1%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
762 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
713 fps -6%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
537 fps -30%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
606 fps +32%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
502 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
472 fps +3%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
458 fps
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
327 fps -29%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
110 fps +83%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
369 fps +9%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
365 fps +7%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
340 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
284 fps -16%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
232 fps -32%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
104 fps +73%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
85 fps +42%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps +4%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
205 fps
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
199 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
161 fps -21%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
126 fps -39%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps +67%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
100 fps +67%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps +25%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
109 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
107 fps +16%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
92 fps
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
65 fps -29%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
107 fps +78%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
321 fps +38%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
287 fps +23%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
237 fps +2%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
233 fps
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
203 fps -13%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +18%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +18%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
48 fps +9%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
44 fps
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
35 fps -20%

网页浏览速度很快,而且在大多数情况下不会出现延迟。图片在滚动时几乎总是可以立即显示。

尽管如此,这款手机在基准测试中的表现却不尽如人意。 一加 13及其上一代芯片几乎总是更快。

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
315.056 Points +115%
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
238.78 Points +63%
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=154, last 2 years)
155 Points +6%
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)
146.211 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (70.1 - 146.2, n=4)
115.8 Points -21%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
109.286 Points -25%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
624 runs/min +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (593 - 624, n=3)
607 runs/min +1%
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)
603 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
425 runs/min -30%
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 140)
404 runs/min -33%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=130, last 2 years)
223 runs/min -63%
Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
31.6 runs/min +48%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
29.3 runs/min +38%
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)
21.3 runs/min
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
20.9 runs/min -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (16.5 - 21.3, n=4)
19.9 runs/min -7%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)
17.9 runs/min -16%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=124, last 2 years)
14.4 runs/min -32%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
278 Points +14%
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)
243 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
236 Points -3%
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
235 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (102 - 278, n=5)
171.8 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=148, last 2 years)
147.3 Points -39%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)
129 Points -47%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
99417 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
99202 Points +1%
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)
98523 Points
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
92054 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (50987 - 99417, n=5)
80938 Points -18%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)
74649 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=202, last 2 years)
48988 Points -50%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=157, last 2 years)
1158 ms * -267%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)
503.8 ms * -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (306 - 635, n=5)
443 ms * -40%
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
432.7 ms * -37%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
376.8 ms * -19%
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)
315.6 ms *
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
305.9 ms * +3%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 4.1 闪存处理数据传输的速度相当快,加载时间也很短。

OnePlus 15OnePlus 13Oppo Find X9 ProSamsung Galaxy S25 UltraXiaomi 17 Pro MaxAverage 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-3%
-32%
-8%
32%
4%
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
3962.2
3984.23
1%
3219.8
-19%
3823.28
-4%
3971.4
0%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
3741.2
3684.36
-2%
1239.76
-67%
3361.24
-10%
3899.9
4%
3201 ?(1240 - 4035, n=21)
-14%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
352.6
301.29
-15%
367.54
4%
287.85
-18%
548.4
56%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
334.4
344.63
3%
176.98
-47%
331.61
-1%
561.3
68%

游戏 - 最高可达 165fps

在游戏方面,OnePlus 的目标是以高达 165fps 的帧速率为游戏指明方向。这在《使命召唤手机版》等游戏中应该是可行的。现在,让我们来测试一下。

通常情况下,我们已经可以在最高设置下以高达 60fps 的帧率流畅地游戏。不过,即使在中等细节下,也能达到 165fps,并能持续保持。这使得游戏非常流畅。

经过改进的触摸灵敏度可以在游戏叠加中激活,即使是专业游戏玩家也会发现这是一个合适的环境。

即使在高细节设置下,其他游戏也能流畅运行。我们使用GameBench软件进行测量。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
使命召唤》移动版
使命召唤》移动版
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
OnePlus 15; Call of Duty Mobile; low: Ø165.6 (151-166)
OnePlus 15; Call of Duty Mobile; very high: Ø59.8 (53-61)
OnePlus 15; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø60.3 (56-61)
OnePlus 15; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø60.4 (55-61)

排放物 - 可能会发热

温度

在负载情况下,我们测得机箱温度明显升高,接近 50°C。由于设备需要冷却,烧毁基准测试多次无法完成。

一些 3DMark 压力测试也无法运行。当我们最终完成测试时,节流现象非常严重,几次基准测试后的剩余性能在 52% 到 62% 之间。

Max. Load
 45.4 °C43.9 °C37.8 °C 
 47.1 °C45.2 °C42.2 °C 
 47.1 °C44.2 °C42 °C 
Maximum: 47.1 °C
Average: 43.9 °C
36.9 °C38.5 °C38.8 °C
38 °C40.2 °C40.9 °C
38.6 °C41.2 °C49.7 °C
Maximum: 49.7 °C
Average: 40.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.1 °C | Room Temperature 19.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
99.6 % +61%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
61.9 %
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
60.3 % -3%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.7 % -10%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.9 % -11%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
65.2 % +25%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52.3 % +1%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
52 %
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 % -2%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
38.7 % -26%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
69.7 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.7 %
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48.1 %
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
20.6 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.7 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.6 %
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
42.4 %
0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
OnePlus 15; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø29.4 (22.7-43.5)
OnePlus 15; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø119.1 (95.3-154)

发言人

OnePlus 15 内置的两个扬声器声音非常清晰,即使在最大音量时也表现出色。虽然 80.4 分贝(A)的音量并没有打破记录,但这款手机的音量仍然足以让一个中等大小的房间充满声音。

喜欢连接外部音频设备或耳机的用户可以通过蓝牙或 USB 连接。无线传输支持最重要的编解码器:SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+ 以及 LDAC 和 LHDC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.234.5252933.13123.324.94028.832.55030.533.96317.619.4809.427.21009.936.512512.544.716010.447.12001052.72508.356.33157.658.94006.556.75008.760.463015.66780012.264.8100011.667.4125010.869.416001071.920007.671.325006.869.231506.461.640006.764.450006.768.86300770.680007.269.1100007.563.7125007.664.6160007.650SPL21.480.4N0.347.9median 7.6median 64.4Delta1.88.146.539.943.236.134.730.836.535.944.345.329.429.918.830.221.743.72152.52058.617.660.61663.516.967.913.164.717.265.621.166.421.366.818.167.916.274.817.876.316.374.512.869.812.568.211.971.212.572.112.680.212.476.812.368.312.270.511.666.728.385.8166.1median 16.2median 67.93.53.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 15Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 15 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 超大电池可连续工作数天

耗电量

即使在轻负载情况下,功耗也相对较高,评测设备的功耗从未低于 1.2 瓦。12.3 瓦的最大功耗也略高于大多数同类设备,但明显低于三星 S25 Ultra。 三星Galaxy S25 Ultra.总而言之,OnePlus 15 的能效只能算中规中矩。

这款手机的充电功率高达 120 瓦,但只有中国进口版本才配备了兼容的充电器。这样手机只需一个多小时就能充满电。无线充电的功率可达 50 瓦,还支持使用或不使用数据线进行反向充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.2 / 1.4 / 1.8 Watt
Load midlight 6.7 / 12.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 15
7300 mAh
OnePlus 13
6000 mAh
Oppo Find X9 Pro
7500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
7500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-11%
21%
1%
29%
12%
8%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
1.2
0.86
28%
0.6
50%
0.55
54%
0.6
50%
0.826 ?(0.6 - 1.2, n=5)
31%
Idle Average * (Watt)
1.4
1.74
-24%
1
29%
0.77
45%
0.8
43%
1.426 ?(0.8 - 2.13, n=5)
-2%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
1.8
1.85
-3%
1.3
28%
0.91
49%
1.4
22%
1.776 ?(1.4 - 2.18, n=5)
1%
Load Average * (Watt)
6.7
10.69
-60%
6.9
-3%
13.81
-106%
6.5
3%
5.83 ?(4.2 - 6.7, n=4)
13%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
12.3
11.92
3%
11.9
3%
16.69
-36%
9.1
26%
10.5 ?(8.9 - 12.3, n=4)
15%

* ... smaller is better

耗电量:Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
OnePlus 15; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.28 (5.31-12.3)
OnePlus 15; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.614 (1.212-3.05)

功耗:GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
OnePlus 15; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.2 (12.1-12.2)
OnePlus 15; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.614 (1.212-3.05)

电池寿命

7,300 毫安时电池分为两节,这意味着欧洲机型不存在监管问题。

在我们的日常 Wi-Fi 测试中,这款手机的续航时间超过了 30 小时。这可能不是一个创纪录的结果,但也是一个非常不错的结果。通常情况下,两天不充电也是可能的。

在负载情况下,手机的续航时间就没那么长了,玩 4 个多小时游戏后就没电了。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
30h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 11min
OnePlus 15
7300 mAh
OnePlus 13
6000 mAh
Oppo Find X9 Pro
7500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
7500 mAh
Battery runtime
-16%
16%
-20%
16%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
30.7
22.5
-27%
34.3
12%
22.2
-28%
33.8
10%
Load (h)
4.2
4
-5%
5
19%
3.7
-12%
5.1
21%
Reader / Idle (h)
37.8
65.6
45.8
70.2
H.264 (h)
38.7
41.2
32.3
34.8

Notebookcheck 总体评分

OnePlus 15 的价格非常实惠,尤其是进口的国产机型。

机身质量高,屏幕明亮,但手机容易过热。此外,相机系统也不错,但并非顶级。

OnePlus 15 评测。评测设备由 Trading Shenzhen 提供。
OnePlus 15 评测。评测设备由 Trading Shenzhen 提供。

OnePlus 15 - 11/25/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
61 / 69 → 89%
Weight
88%
Battery
96%
Display
91%
Games Performance
38 / 55 → 70%
Application Performance
81 / 85 → 95%
AI Performance
34%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
83%
Average
71%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
95.4%
Repairability
72%
Software Updates
86.7%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 59%

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
87.1%
OnePlus 15
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $799.99
OnePlus 13,16GB RAM + 512GB ...
2. $8.99
Suttkue for OnePlus 15 Scree...
3. $9.99
ottpluscase [2 Pack Screen P...
List Price: 999€
215 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.78"
2772x1272
450 PPI
AMOLED
2.
87.6%
OnePlus 13
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $799.99
OnePlus 13,16GB RAM + 512GB ...
2. $11.99
JZG 3 Pack Screen Protector ...
3. $549.99
OnePlus 13R, 12GB RAM + 256G...
List Price: 720€
213 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"
3168x1440
510 PPI
AMOLED
3.
87.7%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘
Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $7.99
Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ...
2. $9.99
Shantime [2 Pack Tempered Gl...
3. $6.67
FZZSZS (3-Pack Screen Protec...
List Price: 1299€
224 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.78"
2772x1272
450 PPI
LTPO AMOLED
4.
89.4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. 
SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra, 25...
2. $908.00
SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra SM-...
3. $1,120.00
Samsung Galaxy ​S25 Ultra ...
List Price: 1449€
218 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.90"
3120x1440
498 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
5.
89%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
Amazon:
1. $8.19
Anoowkoa 3 Pack Glass Screen...
2. $9.90
Anbzsign 2+1 Pack for Xiaomi...
3. $14.53
INIU for iPhone 17 Charger, ...
List Price: 940€
219 g1TB UFS 4.1 Flash6.90"
2608x1200
416 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > OnePlus 15 智能手机评测--游戏速度达 165fps,尽管比前代产品慢一些
Florian Schmitt, 2025-11-28 (Update: 2025-11-28)