判决
摩托罗拉 Edge 70 非常轻巧纤薄。拿在手里感觉很特别。然而,这些特质都有明显的妥协。与上一代产品相比,该机的价格提高了一倍多,但购买者却不再获得光学变焦功能,而且相机系统虽然仍能拍摄出好照片,但灵活性却明显下降。
有些功能也与这个价位格格不入。其中包括速度相对较慢的 USB 2.0 端口(不支持 DisplayPort)、只能将刷新率降至最低 60 Hz 的显示器,以及最重要的、速度在同类产品中只能算中等的片上系统。
这是令人遗憾的,因为摩托罗拉 Edge 70 做工精良,外观极具吸引力,支持无线充电,尽管设计纤薄,但其电池续航时间仍完全适合日常使用。
在网上已经可以找到大幅折扣优惠。如果这款注重设计的超薄设备价格继续下降,那么创新设计与中端硬件的结合将变得更加吸引人。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
德国亚马逊网站上,摩托罗拉 Edge 70 目前仍有售,价格接近全价,略低于 800 欧元。
与此同时,在测试时已经可以在网上找到明显更便宜的报价。不过,在美国,还没有通过摩托罗拉美国公司正式确认 MSRP 或上市时间。因此,第三方零售商和比价网站列出的价格应被视为仅供参考,并可能因销售商和配置的不同而有所变化。
一些读者可能还记得摩托罗拉的 Moto Z 系列,它曾一度将超薄智能手机推向市场。即便如此,脆弱的显示屏和有限的电池容量也是妥协的一部分。
随着摩托罗拉 Edge 70 的推出,摩托罗拉将重新审视这种做法,这次没有采用模块化配件,而是与Apple 和三星所流行的超薄设计趋势保持一致。
规格
机箱 - 纤薄而坚固
乍一看,这款手机机身纤薄,重量仅为 159 克,给人留下了深刻印象。由于采用了铝制框架,智能手机手感依然坚实,不会出现弯曲和吱吱作响的情况。
与前几代产品不同的是,现在相机模块在金属背景中显得格外突出。镜头周围的颜色与后面板形成鲜明对比。
机身有四种 Pantone 颜色可供选择:深灰色、灰绿色、绿色和 Pantone 2026 年度色彩 "云舞者"(白色)。在这个版本中,智能手机的后面板还嵌入了小水晶。
该设备通过了 IP68 和 IP69 标准认证。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
特点 - 在西方市场只有一种存储选择
在欧洲,这款手机配备 512 GB 内部存储空间和 12 GB 内存。在中国,还提供 256 GB 版本。由于该手机没有 microSD 卡插槽,因此无法扩展存储空间。
尽管价格相对较高,但摩托罗拉 Edge 70 仅有一个 USB 2.0 端口,不能输出 DisplayPort 信号。不过,可以通过 Miracast 进行无线屏幕传输。此外,它还配备了用于非接触式支付的 NFC 功能。
软件 - 接近库存Android
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 快速 Wi-Fi 性能
Edge 70 支持 Wi-Fi 6E,可以使用较不拥堵的 6 GHz 频段来传输无线网络。在我们与参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 的测试中,它提供了良好的吞吐量,明显优于上一代产品。
在移动连接方面,Edge 70 支持多种频段,非常适合旅行时使用。在我们的测试中,抽查的接收效果也很好。
| Networking | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Honor 400 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average Wi-Fi 6E | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
电话和通话质量 - 听起来不错
摩托罗拉依靠谷歌的电话应用程序,该程序布局清晰,提供所有基本功能,包括 VoLTE 和 Vo5G。
在我们的测试通话中,无论是通过听筒还是使用免提电话,语音质量都很好,没有干扰。
相机--明显的妥协
鉴于 "纤薄轻巧 "的概念,摩托罗拉削减摄像头系统是可以理解的。然而,这是 Edge 60的主要优势之一,尤其是其光学变焦功能。而价格要贵得多的 Edge 70 现在却没有这项功能,这至少是令人失望的。
5000 万像素的主摄像头能在光线充足的环境下拍摄出清晰、高对比度的照片,在光线较暗的环境下也能拍出不错的效果。不过,较远的物体就无法捕捉到同样的细节了。
超广角摄像头能够拍摄出极具吸引力的全景照片,但对细节的呈现不够准确。
前置摄像头也采用 5000 万像素传感器,照片清晰,但感光度不高。
主摄像头和前置摄像头均可拍摄 60 fps 的 4K 视频。两种情况下的图像质量都很好,自动对焦的响应速度也相当快,而且不显眼。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
PflanzeUmgebungLow LightWeitwinkelkamera

配件和保修 - 欧盟无充电器
在欧盟国家,包装盒中不包括充电器。不过,制造商提供了一个透明硬塑料盒,仍然支持无线充电。
摩托罗拉提供 24 个月的 保修保修。
输入设备和操作 - 快速、精确
显示屏 - PWM
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1374 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.45 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.131
CCT: 6391 K
| Motorola Edge 70 P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Motorola Edge 60 P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Honor 400 OLED, 2736x1264, 6.6" | Xiaomi 15S Pro 3200x1440, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 17% | 29% | -48% | -54% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1374 | 1362 -1% | 1605 17% | 983 -28% | 1399 2% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1333 | 1336 0% | 1607 21% | 949 -29% | 1371 3% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 95 | 95 0% | 96 1% | 91 -4% | 94 -1% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.45 | 0.93 36% | 0.7 52% | 2.07 -43% | 3.9 -169% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.62 | 1.69 35% | 1.5 43% | 5.24 -100% | 6.3 -140% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 1.2 33% | 1.1 39% | 3.3 -83% | 2.1 -17% |
| Gamma | 2.131 103% | 2.201 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.233 99% | 2.01 109% |
| CCT | 6391 102% | 6585 99% | 6422 101% | 7224 90% | 6506 100% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 180 Hz Amplitude: 15 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 180 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 180 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8111 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise | |
| ↘ 2.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.4 ms rise | |
| ↘ 1.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms). | ||
性能--与同价位产品相比动力不足
高通 高通骁龙 7 代 4高通骁龙 7 代 4 是一款中端 SoC,在 800 欧元左右的价位上显得动力不足。
虽然它通常能够提供流畅的系统体验,但性能空间有限。
| CrossMark - Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=126, last 2 years) | |
| Honor 400 | |
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=139, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB (n=1) | |
| AImark - Score v3.x | |
| Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=126, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision NPU 1.5 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB (n=1) | |
| Half Precision NPU 1.5 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB (n=1) | |
| Quantized NPU 1.5 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB (n=1) | |
在图形性能方面,这款智能手机明显优于上一代产品。不过,考虑到价格大约翻了一番,人们有理由期待更强大的性能。
由于采用了现代芯片,几乎所有手机游戏在 Edge 70 上都能流畅运行。不过,它不支持光线追踪等高级功能。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Honor 400 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Honor 400 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Honor 400 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Honor 400 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Honor 400 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Honor 400 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Honor 400 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Honor 400 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Honor 400 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Honor 400 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
虽然在大型网站上加载图片时偶尔会出现短暂的延迟,但在摩托罗拉 Edge 70 上浏览网页一般都非常快。
| Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=154, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB (n=1) | |
| Motorola Edge 70 (Chrome 142) | |
| Honor 400 (Chrome 137) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 (Chrome 136.0.7103.125) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge 70 (Chrome 142) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB (n=1) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 (Chrome 136.0.7103.125) | |
| Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72) | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=125, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge 70 (Chrome 142) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB (n=1) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 (Chrome 136.0.7103.125) | |
| WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72) | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro (Chrome 137) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=148, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 (Chrome 136.0.7103.125) | |
| Motorola Edge 70 (Chrome 142) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB (n=1) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72) | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 (Chrome 136.0.7103.125) | |
| Motorola Edge 70 (Chrome 142) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB (n=1) | |
| Honor 400 (Chrome 137) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=156, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 (Chrome 136.0.7103.125) | |
| Motorola Edge 70 (Chrome 142) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro (Chromne 137) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72) | |
* ... smaller is better
Edge 70 采用 UFS 3.1 存储系统,与真正的高端智能手机相比还有差距。即便如此,数据传输速度还是很快,加载时间也相当短。
| Motorola Edge 70 | Motorola Edge 60 | Honor 400 | Xiaomi 15S Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -37% | -2% | 71% | 26% | -14% | -4% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 2021.5 | 970.1 -52% | 1962.46 -3% | 3786.34 87% | 3907.51 93% | 1872 ? -7% | 2223 ? 10% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 2028.2 | 791.35 -61% | 1812.5 -11% | 3649.81 80% | 2285.66 13% | 1324 ? -35% | 1838 ? -9% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 299 | 258.29 -14% | 333.34 11% | 422.84 41% | 431.86 44% | 288 ? -4% | 295 ? -1% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 387.3 | 305.41 -21% | 377.57 -3% | 677.95 75% | 210.99 -46% | 355 ? -8% | 335 ? -14% |
排放 - 会发热
温度
在长时间加载后,表面温度明显升高,在我们的测量中最高达到 49.5 °C。这个温度相当高,特别是考虑到测试是在室温下进行的。
性能在较长时间内基本不受影响。只有在 3DMark 压力测试接近尾声时,性能才会明显下降,最高降幅约为 30%。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.5 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor 400 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor 400 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
发言人
扬声器位于手机的下边缘,由听筒支撑,可产生轻微的立体声效果。不过,在最大音量时,它听起来有些吃力,无法再完整清晰地再现音乐。
蓝牙音频编解码器的选择范围很广,可以顺利连接外部耳机或扬声器。
Motorola Edge 70 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 - 尽管机身纤薄,但续航能力良好
耗电量
事实证明,在空闲模式下,Edge 70 比同类智能手机略耗电,但总体功耗仍在合理范围内。
使用兼容充电器时,手机充电功率可达 67 瓦,充电时间不到一小时。此外还支持无线充电,最高功率可达 15 瓦。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Motorola Edge 70 4800 mAh | Motorola Edge 60 5200 mAh | Honor 400 5300 mAh | Xiaomi 15S Pro 6100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 3900 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 1% | 35% | 3% | -33% | 0% | -5% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.1 | 1 9% | 0.46 58% | 0.8 27% | 0.59 46% | 1.1 ? -0% | 0.848 ? 23% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.4 | 1.5 -7% | 1.12 20% | 1.4 -0% | 1.12 20% | 1.4 ? -0% | 1.434 ? -2% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 1.9 | 1.9 -0% | 1.36 28% | 1.7 11% | 1.19 37% | 1.9 ? -0% | 1.618 ? 15% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 5.1 | 5.6 -10% | 6.3 -24% | 14.72 -189% | 5.1 ? -0% | 7.01 ? -37% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 9.2 | 8 13% | 9.1 1% | 16.57 -80% | 9.2 ? -0% | 11.3 ? -23% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗:Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
功耗:GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
硅碳电池容量为 4,800 mAh,容量足够大。
在我们进行的实际 Wi-Fi 浏览测试中,Edge 70 的续航时间达到了 19 小时 34 分钟。这样的续航时间可以满足用户的日常使用需求,大多数用户可以使用一整天而无需充电。
| Motorola Edge 70 4800 mAh | Motorola Edge 60 5200 mAh | Honor 400 5300 mAh | Xiaomi 15S Pro 6100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 3900 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 4% | 2% | 30% | -9% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 19.6 | 20.3 4% | 20 2% | 25.4 30% | 17.9 -9% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 38.8 | 43.8 | |||
| H.264 (h) | 23.2 | 25.7 | |||
| Load (h) | 4.8 | 3.6 |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Motorola Edge 70
- 12/10/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
可能的替代品一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motorola Edge 70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 722 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $11.98 JZG 2 Pack Tempered Glass Sc... 2. $9.88 LXEEOLX [2 Pack Hydrogel Scr... 3. $10.99 MAOUICI Tempered Glass for M... List Price: 799€ | 159 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI P-OLED | |
| Motorola Edge 60 MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $599.99 Motorola Moto Edge 60 Pro 5G... 2. $6.98 Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible ... 3. $11.99 Ibywind For Motorola Edge 60... List Price: 429.99 Euro | 179 g | 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI P-OLED | |
| Honor 400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 720 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $11.99 Ibywind for Honor 400 5G Scr... 2. $11.99 Ibywind For Honor 400 Pro 5G... 3. $4.99 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... List Price: 550€ | 184 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.55" 2736x1264 460 PPI OLED | |
| Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1 ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC16 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $6.59 Anoowkoa 3 Pack Designed for... 2. $7.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi 15T Pro S... 3. $13.87 NEOYUKL Privacy Screen Prote... List Price: 830€ | 216 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.73" 3200x1440 521 PPI | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $809.00 SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Edge Phon... 2. $7.99 firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree... 3. $13.59 AACL 3-Pack for Samsung Gala... List Price: 1249€ | 163 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" 3120x1440 395 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.










































