Notebookcheck

宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q) 笔记本电脑评测

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Zewei Shen), 03/07/2019
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

几近完美。 凭借掠夺者Triton 500,宏碁推出了一款极其紧凑的游戏笔记本电脑,尽管体积较小,但仍可提供强大的硬件性能。除了英特尔六核处理器外,Nvidia全新的GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q高端GPU也在不断发挥其作用。

Acer Predator Triton 500 (Predator Triton Series)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Core: 735 MHz, Memory: 6000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 417.71
Memory
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 GB DDR4-2666,双通道
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, G-Sync, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM370
Storage
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0), 512 GB 
, NVMe SSDs; slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280
Soundcard
Realtek Unknown @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机接口,麦克风接口
Networking
Killer E3000 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10MBit), Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW) (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 359 x 255
Battery
82 Wh, 5400 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 4 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 双声道扬声器, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 180-watt power supply, various manufacturer tools, XSplit Gamecaster trial, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.144 kg
Price
2600欧元(约等于20000元人民币) ~ EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg358 mm 248 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg360 mm 268 mm 15.8 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.1 kg
Left side: power, RJ45-LAN, USB-A 3.0, HDMI, microphone, headphones
Left side: power, RJ45-LAN, USB-A 3.0, HDMI, microphone, headphones
Right side: Thunderbolt 3, mini-DisplayPort, 2x USB-A 3.0, Kensington lock
Right side: Thunderbolt 3, mini-DisplayPort, 2x USB-A 3.0, Kensington lock
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼99% +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
671 MBit/s ∼98%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
660 MBit/s ∼96% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=239)
603 MBit/s ∼88% -10%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
693 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s ∼99%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s ∼96% -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s ∼95% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 730, n=239)
555 MBit/s ∼80% -19%
280
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 314 cd/m² Average: 298.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 304 cd/m²
Contrast: 1126:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.66 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 1.72
ΔE Greyscale 5.53 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
93% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.5
Acer Predator Triton 500
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
-63%
-57%
-67%
9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8 (4, 4)
16.4 (8.8, 7.6)
-105%
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
-110%
17.6 (9.2, 8.4)
-120%
7.4 (3.8, 3.6)
7%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 (6, 5.2)
13.6 (8.4, 5.2)
-21%
11.6 (7.2, 4.4)
-4%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-14%
10 (4.4, 5.6)
11%
PWM Frequency
Screen
15%
7%
14%
11%
Brightness middle
304
250
-18%
314.7
4%
254
-16%
294
-3%
Brightness
299
235
-21%
312
4%
262
-12%
275
-8%
Brightness Distribution
89
85
-4%
90
1%
89
0%
84
-6%
Black Level *
0.27
0.29
-7%
0.38
-41%
0.22
19%
0.24
11%
Contrast
1126
862
-23%
828
-26%
1155
3%
1225
9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.66
1.46
69%
2.56
45%
2.37
49%
2.57
45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.65
2.47
74%
4.89
49%
4.71
51%
4.88
49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.72
1.71
1%
1.84
-7%
2.14
-24%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.53
1.27
77%
3.4
39%
1.58
71%
2.41
56%
Gamma
2.5 88%
2.4 92%
2.3 96%
2.48 89%
2.5 88%
CCT
8028 81%
6749 96%
6435 101%
6785 96%
6370 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
60
0%
60.7
1%
60
0%
59
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
93
0%
94.6
2%
92
-1%
91
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-24% / 2%
-25% / -3%
-27% / 2%
10% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9439 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.98 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
10.98 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
176 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1019 Points
Help
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø980 (961.82-1019.05)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1095 (1087.31-1156.25)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø922 (913.2-999)
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø981 (927.26-1023.23)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1004 (937.73-1119.73)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points ∼100%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼94% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 212, n=482)
155 Points ∼88% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1156 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
1120 Points ∼97% +10%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
1053 Points ∼91% +3%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1019 Points ∼88%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
999 Points ∼86% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=485)
804 Points ∼70% -21%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
2 Points ∼100% +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points ∼99%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.89 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=416)
1.685 Points ∼84% -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.44 Points ∼100% +13%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.82 Points ∼95% +8%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
10.98 Points ∼88%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.4, n=517)
7.37 Points ∼59% -33%
PCMark 10 - Score
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
5883 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points ∼92% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5353 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5170 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=176)
5153 Points ∼88% -12%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5095 Points ∼87% -13%
Acer Predator Triton 500
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
AS SSD
-16%
1%
-3%
-21%
Score Total
3770
2722
-28%
4079
8%
4122
9%
3294
-13%
Score Write
1435
957
-33%
2010
40%
2051
43%
1515
6%
Score Read
1558
1180
-24%
1362
-13%
1346
-14%
1161
-25%
4K Write
107.21
107.12
0%
110.72
3%
107.15
0%
103.63
-3%
4K Read
38.7
55.04
42%
52.31
35%
48.94
26%
40.02
3%
Seq Write
2492.02
1471.06
-41%
1822.26
-27%
1834.04
-26%
1260.72
-49%
Seq Read
2913.4
2112.83
-27%
1839.67
-37%
1266.1
-57%
903.24
-69%
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3536 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2902 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 338.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 298.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2107 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2455 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 38.82 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 93.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator Triton 500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28083 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22723 Points ∼81% -19%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22089 Points ∼79% -21%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18687 Points ∼67% -33%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18296 Points ∼65% -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=581)
12953 Points ∼46% -54%
3DMark 11 Performance
20149 points
Help
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0); The Witcher 3: Ø76.1 (70-81)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; The Witcher 3: Ø62.2 (57-70)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8; The Witcher 3: Ø51.3 (44-61)
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; The Witcher 3: Ø49.5 (46-53)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; The Witcher 3: Ø50.3 (45-54)
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Predator Triton 500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
76.5 (min: 63) fps ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
68.9 fps ∼90% -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
58.3 (min: 48) fps ∼76% -24%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
52.7 fps ∼69% -31%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
49.2 fps ∼64% -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=281)
48.5 fps ∼63% -37%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Acer Predator Triton 500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
136 (min: 104) fps ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
130.1 fps ∼96% -4%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
95.5 fps ∼70% -30%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
90.4 fps ∼66% -34%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
86.5 fps ∼64% -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 194, n=236)
83.6 fps ∼61% -39%
low med. high ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 13676.5fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 134129fps
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) 6562fps

Noise Level

Idle
30 / 32 / 34 dB(A)
Load
44 / 47 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-2%
9%
2%
-9%
-1%
off / environment *
29
30
-3%
28.8
1%
30
-3%
29
-0%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=285)
-1%
Idle Minimum *
30
32
-7%
28.8
4%
30
-0%
33
-10%
31.5 (28 - 41.7, n=708)
-5%
Idle Average *
32
34
-6%
28.8
10%
31
3%
34
-6%
32.7 (28 - 46.6, n=708)
-2%
Idle Maximum *
34
36
-6%
29.4
14%
34
-0%
40
-18%
34.7 (28 - 51, n=708)
-2%
Load Average *
44
42
5%
35.7
19%
43
2%
47
-7%
40.6 (30.3 - 58, n=709)
8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
46
44
4%
42.5
8%
42
9%
51
-11%
Load Maximum *
47
48
-2%
45
4%
44
6%
53
-13%
47.9 (38.9 - 66, n=709)
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 44 °C48 °C47 °C 
 45 °C49 °C45 °C 
 38 °C39 °C38 °C 
Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 43.7 °C
58 °C58 °C44 °C
55 °C56 °C44 °C
44 °C43 °C41 °C
Maximum: 58 °C
Average: 49.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.5 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 42 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-10.2 °C / -18.4 F).
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
2%
14%
11%
1%
8%
Maximum Upper Side *
49
56
-14%
49
-0%
49
-0%
54
-10%
45.8 (28 - 68.8, n=674)
7%
Maximum Bottom *
58
66
-14%
49
16%
63
-9%
60
-3%
49.4 (25.9 - 78, n=672)
15%
Idle Upper Side *
33
27
18%
25.4
23%
24
27%
30
9%
30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=625)
7%
Idle Bottom *
33
27
18%
27.2
18%
25
24%
30
9%
31.6 (21.1 - 50.3, n=623)
4%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.542.72540.138.23130.133.44034.142.15037.532.6632732.380313210031.339.212524.845.216023.450.720022.555.22502461.331520.967.640019.165.350018.161.963017.767.280017.371.6100016.969.4125018.97016001869.6200016.771.3250017.270315017.170.640001767500017.363.4630017.165.5800017.167.21000017.164.21250017.157.61600016.852.9SPL29.980.7N1.451.1median 17.3median 65.5Delta1.96.434.433.32930.527.227.627.131.92729.42532.324.83925.241.222.438.322.845.721.753.421.357.219.860.719.56519.470.119.475.519.377.119.37619.374.619.472.919.469.319.568.719.763.519.764.619.465.819.364.919.563.419.858.619.954.219.648.431.683.21.654.2median 19.5median 64.60.67.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Predator Triton 500Acer Predator Triton 700
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Predator Triton 500 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Predator Triton 700 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 1.7 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 16 / 22 / 32 Watt
Load midlight 89 / 173 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
11%
18%
23%
-7%
-9%
Idle Minimum *
16
16
-0%
10.4
35%
7
56%
17
-6%
19.7 (3.5 - 113, n=669)
-23%
Idle Average *
22
18
18%
14.6
34%
11
50%
20
9%
25.1 (6.8 - 119, n=669)
-14%
Idle Maximum *
32
23
28%
16.3
49%
20
37%
29
9%
30.3 (8.3 - 122, n=669)
5%
Load Average *
89
88
1%
88.5
1%
98
-10%
112
-26%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=660)
-17%
Load Maximum *
173
167
3%
182.4
-5%
182
-5%
211
-22%
170 (21.9 - 590, n=659)
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
147
120
18%
155.4
-6%
132
10%
152
-3%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
5h 35min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 10min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 21min
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 82 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, 94.24 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, 80 Wh
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, 82 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, 50 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
93%
72%
47%
-34%
11%
Reader / Idle
335
549
64%
682
104%
507
51%
213
-36%
340 (39 - 1174, n=640)
1%
WiFi v1.3
190
382
101%
387
104%
362
91%
157
-17%
254 (78 - 622, n=327)
34%
Load
81
174
115%
88
9%
81
0%
42
-48%
79 (18 - 202, n=606)
-2%
H.264
364
356
249 (88 - 506, n=138)

Pros

+ 优点:
+ 紧凑的机身
+ 强大的性能
+ 全金属机身
+ 雷电3
+ 窄边框
+ GSync
+ 144Hz

Cons

- 恼人的开机音效(可在BIOS中关闭)
- 可维护性有限
- 续航一般般
- 不支持英伟达Optimus
宏碁掠夺者Triton 500, test unit provided by Acer Germany
宏碁掠夺者Triton 500, test unit provided by Acer Germany

宏碁掠夺者Triton 500距离“非常好”的评价就差那么一点点了。这台15英寸笔记本电脑几乎满足了现代游戏笔记本的所有标准。除了纤薄的显示器边框和外壳之外,我们还应该提到这里的144-Hz搭载着G-Sync。

Triton 500也不缺乏性能。经过测试我们发现Core i7-8750H和GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q的组合可以毫不费力地处理任何当前的全高清分辨率游戏。

然而,对于我们来说,为什么宏碁不使用图形切换是不可理解的。在移动性方面,Optimus绝对会提供自己的优势。我们发现可维护性方面存在其他缺陷。内部设计使买家几乎无法改动任何组件(关键字:存储解决方案和RAM)。

“尽管如此,我们仍然认为Triton 500比旧的Triton 700更为成功。”

Acer Predator Triton 500 - 02/14/2019 v6
Florian Glaser

Chassis
80 / 98 → 82%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
62 / 81 → 76%
Weight
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Battery
70%
Display
86%
Games Performance
98%
Application Performance
100%
Temperature
75 / 95 → 79%
Noise
75 / 90 → 83%
Audio
75%
Average
79%
87%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q) 笔记本电脑评测
Florian Glaser, 2019-03- 7 (Update: 2019-03- 7)