Notebookcheck Logo

Realme GT 5G智能手机评测--Poco F3的有力替代品

更多的力量! realme GT 5G在测试中以强大的性能令人信服,并直接攻击小米的Poco系列,因为尽管其高端SoC,但该智能手机的价格已经低于400欧元(约472美元)。在我们的评论中了解它还能提供什么,以及在哪些方面做了节省。
5G Smartphone Touchscreen Android

realme GT 5G是一款令人兴奋的预算旗舰智能手机。该公司是步步高电子的一部分,其中还包括Oppo和OnePlus等制造商。

它配备了一个6.43英寸的超级AMOLED显示屏,可以在120赫兹下工作。它由一个 骁龙888并可以依靠8或12GB的RAM,具体取决于配置。内部存储为128或256GB。电池 还提供双扬声器、64MP三摄像头、65瓦的快速充电和4500毫安的电池。

较小的型号价格为449欧元(约530美元的零售价),较大的型号为549欧元(约648美元)。我们的评论样本是较便宜的智能手机,有时通过特别优惠提供的价格低于400欧元(约合472美元)。

Realme GT 5G (GT Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 660
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.43 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, Capacitive, 10 Multi-Touch-Points, Super AMOLED, 360 Hz Touch Sampling Rate, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 109.5 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), 4G (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 158.5 x 73.3
Battery
4500 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (Sony IMX682, f/1.8, 26 mm, 1/1.73", 0.8µm) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.3, 15.7 mm, 1/4.0", 1.12 µm) + 2 MPix (Macro, f/2.4); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.5, 26 mm, 1/3.0", 1.0 µm)
Additional features
Keyboard: Onscreen, 65W-Charger, USB-Kabel, Headset, Protect Case, SIM Card Tool, Screen Protect Film, Quick Start Guide, realme UI 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), QZSS (L1, L5), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), NavIC (L5); SAR: 1.470 W/kg, fanless
Weight
186 g, Power Supply: 147 g
Price
449 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85.9 %
08/2021
Realme GT 5G
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
186 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
86 %
04/2021
Xiaomi Poco F3
SD 870, Adreno 650
196 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
85.4 %
05/2021
Motorola Moto G100
SD 870, Adreno 650
207 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2520x1080
85.9 %
05/2021
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
SD 780G 5G, Adreno 642
159 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
83 %
04/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080

realme GT 5G不太重,拿在手里很合适。圆润的背面也给人一种非常苗条的印象。背面的摄像头突出1.35毫米(约0.05英寸),这确保了智能手机可以在平面上大幅倾斜。

做工很讨人喜欢。前面和后面都有未指定的玻璃,而边框则由金属外观的塑料覆盖。然而,这并没有减少高质量的印象。围绕显示屏的黑色塑料框架更是如此。缝隙紧密而均匀。GT 5G并没有受到扭转应力的影响。

这款realme智能手机有潇洒蓝、潇洒银和赛车黄三种颜色,后者的背面是人造革。电池是永久安装的,没有IP认证。

Size comparison

168.4 mm 74 mm 9.7 mm 207 g163.7 mm 76.4 mm 7.8 mm 196 g159.9 mm 75.1 mm 8.4 mm 189 g160.53 mm 75.72 mm 6.81 mm 159 g158.5 mm 73.3 mm 8.4 mm 186 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - realme GT带音频插孔,但没有microSD

realme GT 5G使用了一个USB 2.0端口,采用Type-C设计。有线图像输出是不可能的,但音频播放和通过OTG使用外围设备是可能的。然而,后者的功能必须在设置中启用,并且在不活动的十分钟后再次关闭。

我们认为整合音频插孔和使用当前标准如NFC、蓝牙5.2和Wi-Fi 6E是积极的。

软件 -Android 11和realme UI 2.0

realme GT 5G搭载了谷歌的Android 11,制造商用其realme UI 2.0覆盖。这是Oppo的ColorOS 11.1的一个略微修改的版本。特别是在菜单上几乎没有任何差异,但HeyTap Cloud的整合是其中之一。

除了realme的一些应用,第三方应用如Facebook或Booking也被预装,但所有这些都可以完全卸载。谷歌的用户账户控制也很活跃。

在测试时,该智能手机提供了2021年6月的最新安全补丁,但realme没有提供关于间隔或一般更新期的确切信息。

通信和GNSS - realme GT配备5G和Wi-Fi 6E

在通信连接方面,realme GT 5G掌握了目前所有的标准,可以毫无问题地连接到所有的移动网络,这并不是因为广泛的频率设备。

Wi-Fi 6E可用于本地网络,在与我们的参考路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12的测试中,它不仅能实现高传输率,还能实现稳定的传输率。在测试中,WLAN接收器的范围也是令人信服的。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Realme GT 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1164 (603min - 1211max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
891 (847min - 921max) MBit/s -23%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
884 (444min - 914max) MBit/s -24%
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 (643min - 704max) MBit/s -41%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
282 (275min - 287max) MBit/s -76%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
874 (833min - 900max) MBit/s +4%
Realme GT 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
841 (768min - 888max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
788 (733min - 833max) MBit/s -6%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
654 (311min - 702max) MBit/s -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s -55%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
331 (322min - 337max) MBit/s -61%
065130195260325390455520585650715780845910975104011051170Tooltip
Realme GT 5G; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø840 (768-888)
Realme GT 5G; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1144 (603-1211)
GPS测试:户外
GPS测试:户外
GPS测试:在大楼里
GPS测试:在大楼里
GPSTest。全球导航卫星系统
全球导航卫星系统

realme GT 5G了解所有用于追踪的常见卫星网络,并建立了一个非常快速的卫星固定。

在短暂的试驾中,该智能手机与Garmin Edge 500进行了比较。realme GT表现出一些意想不到的弱点,即使连接选项如此广泛,偶尔也会有点偏离轨道。然而,我们并不期望在日常导航任务中受到任何限制。

全球卫星导航系统的试驾。环湖航行
全球卫星导航系统的试驾。环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统试运行。转折点
全球导航卫星系统试运行。转折点
全球导航卫星系统试运行:总结
全球导航卫星系统试运行:总结

电话功能和语音质量

realme GT 5G使用标准的Android 电话应用,但没有直接的SIP支持。也没有实施WLAN呼叫,但VoLTE已经上岗。

语音质量是令人信服的,只要将智能手机放在耳边,就能在两个方向上进行良好的沟通。噪声抑制工作可靠;即使是大的噪声也听不到,但在这种情况下,用户的声音传输是空洞和鼻音的。使用该扬声器的人必须准备好接受强大的混响。

相机 - realme GT的三重光学系统没有什么特别之处。

与realme GT 5G自拍
与realme GT 5G自拍

realme GT 5G的前置摄像头可以通过许多设置选项实现体面的自拍,但视频最多只能以全高清记录。通过双视角视频,也可以用前后镜头同时录制电影。

主摄像头依赖于一个有前途的64MP传感器。白天的照片相当不错,但它们的特点是动态范围相对较低,色彩再现不平衡,特别是对蓝色和棕色的色调捕捉得太深。全景拍摄有时看起来很做作,过度饱和,只呈现出一些细节。我们在这里期待更多,因为平庸的图片结果主要是由于不成熟的图像算法。

微距光学装置是一个不错的想法。然而,在大多数情况下,2倍数码变焦(最大20倍放大率)将提供更好的结果。超广角让人失望,不仅细节不多,而且在外围区域显示出强烈的像差。

用主摄像头拍摄的视频可以达到60FPS的超高清效果。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleWide-angleZoom (5x)Ultra wide angleLow-Light
ColorChecker
15.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
13 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Realme GT 5G: 7.56 ∆E min: 2.1 - max: 15.79 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.1 ∆E
48.4 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
43 ∆E
58.5 ∆E
48.4 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
60.6 ∆E
60.9 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
30.4 ∆E
69.1 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
68.4 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
49.5 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker Realme GT 5G: 42.81 ∆E min: 12.99 - max: 69.08 ∆E

配件和保修 - 只有一年的保修期

制造商只为realme GT 5G提供了12个月的保修,这并不影响 法定经销商保修.

一个笨重的65瓦快速充电适配器,一条USB线,一个硅胶保险杠,一个SIM卡针,以及一些包含保修条件和安全说明的传单都包括在内。已经贴上了显示屏保护膜。

输入设备和操作 - realme GT 5G中可靠的指纹传感器

电容式触摸屏具有良好的滑行性能,可同时识别多达10次的触摸。谷歌的GBoard被预装为键盘布局,但它可以被Play Store中的任何键盘取代。

在生物识别安全方面,显示屏下有一个光学指纹扫描仪,它被放置在离显示屏下边缘很近的地方。它能非常快速和可靠地识别存储的指纹。另外,也可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别。

物理按键有一个清晰的压力点,行程较短,并很好地集成到边框中。

显示屏 - 超级AMOLED,120赫兹

子像素结构
子像素结构
高于59%的OLED闪烁
高于59%的OLED闪烁

realme GT 5G的OLED屏幕尺寸为6.43英寸(16.33厘米),由于其高像素密度,提供了清晰的显示。该面板可以在60或120赫兹下工作,但自适应控制不可用。除了HLG,还支持HDR10和HDR10+。

然而,为了实现最佳的HDR显示,还可以多一些亮度储备,因为在激活环境光传感器的情况下,该面板的平均亮度为606cd/m²,在屏幕中心的亮度和黑暗区域的均匀分布(APL50),可以达到762cd/m²。在这方面, Poco F3(高达1,175 cd/m²)有相当多的储备。如果你想手动调整亮度,你可以达到421 cd/m²。

即使是Super AMOLED屏幕也不能避免典型的OLED闪烁。虽然真正的GT名义上没有可激活的直流调光,但面板控制相对来说还是比较容易上手的。在可调亮度的60%以下,它在235.8和242.7赫兹之间运行。对于120赫兹的面板来说,这不是特别高,但振幅曲线相当均匀,所以敏感的人的压力应该不大。超过60%时,面板在120赫兹模式下持续运行。

606
cd/m²
602
cd/m²
595
cd/m²
614
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
601
cd/m²
616
cd/m²
606
cd/m²
606
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 616 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 605.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.93 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 605 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Realme GT 5G
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Xiaomi Poco F3
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Motorola Moto G100
IPS/LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.70
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Screen
27%
-141%
-56%
-35%
Brightness middle
605
889
47%
562
-7%
863
43%
744
23%
Brightness
606
902
49%
535
-12%
860
42%
749
24%
Brightness Distribution
97
95
-2%
90
-7%
93
-4%
98
1%
Black Level *
0.57
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
0.9
31%
3.99
-207%
3.2
-146%
2.2
-69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.1
1.9
39%
9.74
-214%
5.2
-68%
7
-126%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
1.3
-0%
6.5
-400%
3.9
-200%
2.1
-62%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.26 97%
2.174 101%
2.33 94%
2.06 107%
CCT
6372 102%
6614 98%
6882 94%
7299 89%
6516 100%
Contrast
986

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 242.7 Hz ≤ 59 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 59 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

如果你想实现最自然的内容显示,你应该在realme GT 5G中选择温和的屏幕模式,但那时你将只使用较小的sRGB色彩空间。默认设置是Vivid,它控制着DCI-P3,并覆盖了91.6%(CalMAN测量)。

灰度(配置文件:温和,目标色彩空间:sRGB
灰度(配置文件:温和,目标色彩空间:sRGB
色彩表现(配置文件:Mild,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
色彩表现(配置文件:Mild,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
色彩空间(配置文件:Mild,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
色彩空间(配置文件:Mild,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
饱和度(配置文件:温和,目标色彩空间:sRGB
饱和度(配置文件:温和,目标色彩空间:sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

realme智能手机在户外应对大多数光线情况没有任何问题。我们只希望在非常明亮的夏日能有更多的亮度储备。

OLED面板的可视角度稳定性非常好。只有在非常平坦的视角下才会出现这种类型的显示屏常见的闪烁现象。然而,这在日常使用中应该不会造成困扰。

在户外
在户外
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能--配备骁龙888的realme GT

realme GT 5G搭载了一颗 骁龙888这是测试时Android 智能手机的最快SoC。因此,大量的计算能力得到了保证,根据配置不同,系统可以使用8或12GB的LPDDR5内存。图形计算是由集成的 Adreno 660它保证了所有游戏在最高细节水平上的流畅显示。

realme智能手机在基准测试中大多在预期的性能范围内运行,但在Geekbench多核测试中,它的速度有些慢。系统基准测试提供了非常好的结果,证实了我们对流畅操作的主观印象。弱点体现在网上冲浪方面。GT在大多数基准测试中都没有达到预期,但在实际操作中并不明显。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1132 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
998 Points -12%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
972 Points -14%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
809 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
636 Points -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (976 - 1198, n=27)
1118 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=216, last 2 years)
914 Points -19%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3379 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3368 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
2870 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2998 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1878 Points -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3204 - 3810, n=27)
3571 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=216, last 2 years)
2997 Points -11%
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4620 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3587 Points -22%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3369 Points -27%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2805 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1272 Points -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3894 - 6176, n=26)
4711 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 9992, n=86, last 2 years)
4246 Points -8%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4658 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3606 Points -23%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3555 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2809 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1304 Points -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3100 - 4786, n=26)
4617 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (434 - 10711, n=78, last 2 years)
4051 Points -13%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
14457 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
13610 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
11218 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (11435 - 17085, n=21)
14307 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=211, last 2 years)
11762 Points -19%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
11018 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7970 Points -28%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
8035 Points -27%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5587 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4040 Points -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (8065 - 11534, n=20)
10135 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (704 - 23024, n=113, last 2 years)
9235 Points -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
16863 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12033 Points -29%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
13531 Points -20%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8380 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4239 Points -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10491 - 17179, n=20)
15130 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 45492, n=112, last 2 years)
16095 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4978 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3653 Points -27%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3318 Points -33%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2567 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3469 Points -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (2975 - 5434, n=20)
4760 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=112, last 2 years)
4393 Points -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
8987 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7377 Points -18%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
6960 Points -23%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4478 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2927 Points -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6110 - 9839, n=21)
8532 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=179, last 2 years)
6717 Points -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12714 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
9498 Points -25%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
10199 Points -20%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6148 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2802 Points -78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (7930 - 12914, n=21)
11629 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=178, last 2 years)
9680 Points -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4436 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4140 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3296 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2354 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3466 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (2579 - 5366, n=21)
4511 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=178, last 2 years)
4214 Points -5%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5942 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4288 Points -28%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
4166 Points -30%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3196 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1103 Points -81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3958 - 5942, n=26)
5674 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 9839, n=133, last 2 years)
2579 Points -57%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5925 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4271 Points -28%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
4152 Points -30%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3212 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1097 Points -81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3959 - 5925, n=26)
5617 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=200, last 2 years)
6267 Points +6%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1559 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1223 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
865 Points -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1236 - 1602, n=21)
1516 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 5226, n=204, last 2 years)
1686 Points +8%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1555 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1222 Points -21%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
786 Points -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (974 - 1564, n=21)
1421 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=199, last 2 years)
1695 Points +9%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
60 fps
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
71 fps +18%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps +50%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
53 fps -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (60 - 143, n=20)
102.5 fps +71%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 165, n=182, last 2 years)
84.5 fps +41%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
268 fps
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
200 fps -25%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
224 fps -16%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
153 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
56 fps -79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (173 - 294, n=20)
247 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=182, last 2 years)
247 fps -8%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
60 fps
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
60 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
89 fps +48%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
79 fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
33 fps -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (55 - 121, n=20)
93.9 fps +57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=184, last 2 years)
72 fps +20%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
162 fps
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
119 fps -27%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
131 fps -19%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
33 fps -80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (101 - 180, n=20)
141.7 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.2 - 363, n=184, last 2 years)
140.6 fps -13%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
60 fps
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
59 fps -2%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
79 fps +32%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
57 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
25 fps -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (36 - 105, n=20)
71.5 fps +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=184, last 2 years)
60.8 fps +1%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
119 fps
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
81 fps -32%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
92 fps -23%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
65 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
26 fps -78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (69 - 126, n=20)
98.9 fps -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 279, n=184, last 2 years)
99.1 fps -17%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
59 fps
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
44 fps -25%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps -20%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
35 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps -73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (26 - 61, n=20)
47.2 fps -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 117, n=184, last 2 years)
43.3 fps -27%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
72 fps
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
48 fps -33%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
57 fps -21%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
40 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps -78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (42 - 74, n=20)
60.6 fps -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 166, n=184, last 2 years)
59.9 fps -17%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
59 fps
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
49 fps -17%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
49 fps -17%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
42 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
18 fps -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (32 - 73, n=26)
55.7 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=223, last 2 years)
43.9 fps -26%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
71 fps
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
57 fps -20%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
57 fps -20%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
50 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20 fps -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (46 - 87, n=27)
70.4 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=223, last 2 years)
64.6 fps -9%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
44 fps
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
33 fps -25%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
31 fps -30%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
26 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
11 fps -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (25 - 51, n=26)
38.5 fps -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 105, n=223, last 2 years)
32.6 fps -26%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
28 fps
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
22 fps -21%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
22 fps -21%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
18 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7.6 fps -73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (19 - 32, n=26)
27.5 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=223, last 2 years)
25.7 fps -8%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
811533 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
680139 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
678958 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
521880 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
393060 Points -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (636471 - 824694, n=17)
767997 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points -9%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
263702 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
111838 Points -58%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6472 Points -98%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
42629 Points -84%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (171404 - 264766, n=15)
243759 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)
21146 Points -92%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6031 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
6356 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
5916 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5068 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3459 Points -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5839 - 6985, n=20)
6495 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)
5745 Points -5%
System (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
10443 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
9997 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
8852 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
9557 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6242 Points -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (9119 - 11774, n=20)
10766 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)
9678 Points -7%
Memory (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5352 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7692 Points +44%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
6757 Points +26%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6172 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4211 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5352 - 9044, n=20)
7316 Points +37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)
6250 Points +17%
Graphics (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
15346 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12801 Points -17%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
11431 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7202 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3989 Points -74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (9399 - 15739, n=20)
13676 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)
14101 Points -8%
Web (sort by value)
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1543 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1658 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
1791 Points +16%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
1563 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1365 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1434 - 1983, n=20)
1683 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)
1494 Points -3%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (77 - 223, n=19)
168.8 Points +42%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
160.9 Points +36%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
135.7 Points +14%
Realme GT 5G (Chrome 91)
118.6 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
105.4 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)
104.3 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
92.3 Points -22%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
147 Points +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (103 - 182, n=18)
143.1 Points +36%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points +27%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
125 Points +19%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
106 Points +1%
Realme GT 5G (Chrome 91)
105 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
82 Points -22%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (23491 - 47543, n=20)
35591 Points +52%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
34161 Points +45%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=210, last 2 years)
33573 Points +43%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
26943 Points +15%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
26577 Points +13%
Realme GT 5G (Chrome 91)
23491 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
17730 Points -25%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
2393 ms * -30%
Realme GT 5G (Chrome 91)
1841 ms *
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
1802 ms * +2%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
1744 ms * +5%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years)
1599 ms * +13%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
1589 ms * +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (891 - 1841, n=20)
1319 ms * +28%

* ... smaller is better

Realme GT 5GXiaomi Poco F3Motorola Moto G100Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5GSamsung Galaxy A52 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
21%
-3%
-21%
19%
36%
Sequential Read 256KB
1587
1378
-13%
1730
9%
949
-40%
927
-42%
Sequential Write 256KB
575
684
19%
717
25%
710
23%
484.6
-16%
Random Read 4KB
198.7
208
5%
253.6
28%
207.9
5%
176.1
-11%
Random Write 4KB
208.4
170.6
-18%
252.9
21%
206.9
-1%
179.2
-14%

排放--弱的SoC冷却

温度

realme GT 5G在怠速模式下明显升温,在永久负载下高达37.7℃(约100°F)。这是相当明显的,但绝对无害。

SoC的冷却更有问题,因为3DMark压力测试显示这里有严重的性能损失。因此,骁龙888的实际性能优势在于 骁龙888的实际性能优势几乎不存在,因为即使 Poco F3拥有名义上较慢的处理器(骁龙870),其最低值也明显高于GT,甚至高于 小米11 Lite 5G(骁龙780)在这种情况下,从长远来看几乎不可能更慢。

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.8 (3150min - 3144max) % +82%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.7 (1097min - 1100max) % +82%
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 (4109min - 4141max) % +81%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82.2 (3521min - 4286max) % +50%
Realme GT 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.7 (3251min - 5948max) %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82.2 (1002min - 1219max) % +50%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82.1 (683min - 832max) % +50%
Realme GT 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.9 (861min - 1568max) %
Max. Load
 37.7 °C37.1 °C35.7 °C 
 37.3 °C37.5 °C35.2 °C 
 37 °C36.2 °C35.5 °C 
Maximum: 37.7 °C
Average: 36.6 °C
34.8 °C36.7 °C36.5 °C
34.7 °C36.7 °C37.1 °C
34.8 °C35.7 °C36.3 °C
Maximum: 37.1 °C
Average: 35.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  31.8 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

演讲者

realme GT 5G的两个扬声器提供了一个体面的声音,但特别是缺乏深度。在大音量下,高音没有被准确呈现,这使声音具有空洞的特点。

这款智能手机的音频插孔(3.5毫米,信噪比:87.60 dBFS)留下了良好的印象,以低噪音和平衡的方式传递声音。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.742.12531.837.43126.527.84023.629.75038.542.2633030.48027.629.410024.535.712514.834.416018.344.320015.947.325016.652.731515.359.440014.262.450015.167.763014.168.880012.574.3100014.775.7125015.173.8160014.774.1200014.374.8250014.777.5315014.579.4400014.382.9500014.182.9630014.379.9800014.473.51000014.372.81250014.363.11600013.154.5SPL26.790.1N0.879.5median 14.5median 73.5Delta0.710.528.323.923.320.520.3241926.529.835.717.225.712.926.219.426.112.139.51149.99.548.812.655.313.660.210.562.31167.99.768.411.174.811.576.812.778.913.479.112.775.813.676.314.180.41380.113.276.813.978.613.475.213.773.214.467.816.76525.189.40.679.5median 13median 74.81.18.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRealme GT 5GXiaomi Poco F3
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Realme GT 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Poco F3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 尽管是120赫兹,但运行时间良好

能源消耗

realme GT 5G的功耗在空闲测量中显示出轻微的增加,但特别是在全负荷下更低,这将是由于与热有关的SoC节流。这在我们调整了显示亮度的GFXBench测量中也非常清楚地显示出来。

4,500毫安时的强大电池可以用65瓦的电源适配器在瞬间充电(约45分钟)。然而,不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.38 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.14 / 1.84 / 1.87 Watt
Load midlight 4.21 / 8.07 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Realme GT 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F3
4520 mAh
Motorola Moto G100
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
4250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
4500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
13%
-7%
4%
11%
-5%
4%
Idle Minimum *
1.14
0.76
33%
0.9
21%
0.83
27%
0.92
19%
Idle Average *
1.84
1.29
30%
1.5
18%
1.92
-4%
1.78
3%
Idle Maximum *
1.87
1.45
22%
2.1
-12%
1.97
-5%
1.81
3%
Load Average *
4.21
4.6
-9%
6.7
-59%
3.84
9%
3.86
8%
5.46 ?(3.87 - 6.7, n=23)
-30%
Load Maximum *
8.07
8.87
-10%
8.5
-5%
8.6
-7%
6.14
24%
9.79 ?(5.89 - 11.7, n=23)
-21%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Realme GT 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G: Ø6.16 (1.438-10.8)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G: Ø5.28 (1.358-11.1)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Realme GT 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.3 (6.54-10.7)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.7 (10.5-10.9)
Realme GT 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.518 (1.315-1.815)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.377 (1.201-1.729)

电池寿命

我们确定了启用120赫兹模式后的电池运行时间,它们处于良好的水平。如果刷新率为60赫兹就足够了,你将能够从realme GT 5G获得更长的运行时间。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 91)
12h 35min
Realme GT 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F3
4520 mAh
Motorola Moto G100
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
4250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
7%
39%
-3%
-6%
WiFi v1.3
755
805
7%
1049
39%
734
-3%
710
-6%
Reader / Idle
1562
2846
1509
1917
H.264
918
1285
1248
1052
Load
329
302
223
324

Pros

+ 120赫兹显示,具有良好的PWM控制
+ Wi-Fi 6E和5G
+ 良好的音频插孔
+ 名义上的快速SoC ...

Cons

- ......在连续负荷下有严重的性能损失
- 相机的附加镜头很弱
- 只有12个月的保修期
- 不支持microSD

评语--对波克公司的挑战

回顾:realme GT 5G。测试设备由德国realme公司提供。
回顾:realme GT 5G。测试设备由德国realme公司提供。

在规格表上,realme GT 5G承诺以较少的钱达到旗舰水平,事实上,它提供的总包包括一个 骁龙888双扬声器、120赫兹OLED显示屏、64MP摄像头和强大的电池,在大多数竞争对手中要贵得多。凭借449欧元(约530美元)的低入门价格,GT也是对Poco F3的自信挑战。 Poco F3,后者在概念上非常相似,但有不同的重点。

realme GT 5G提供了一个有吸引力的整体包装,但也有改进的潜力。

令人遗憾的是,realme没有设法将强大的SoC冷却得足够好,但这只会在高要求的游戏中引起注意。作为回报,系统性能确实很好。然而,步步高子公司也不得不接受对三摄像头的批评。附加镜头很弱,主摄像头的图像算法也需要改进。

然而,realme成功地用GT 5G打造了一款好的智能手机,考虑到其价格,这是一个强大的整体包装。只是大存储量版本的附加费用有点高。除了Poco F3之外,强有力的替代品还有 Galaxy A52 5GNord CE 5G.

价格和可用性

realme GT 5G在制造商的在线商店有各种型号的产品。.它也可以在Amazon(DE) 和Kaufland.

Realme GT 5G - 08/31/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
54 / 70 → 76%
Weight
89%
Battery
89%
Display
92%
Games Performance
59 / 64 → 91%
Application Performance
79 / 86 → 92%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 86%
Camera
64%
Average
80%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Realme GT 5G智能手机评测--Poco F3的有力替代品
Daniel Schmidt, 2021-08-14 (Update: 2021-08-14)