Notebookcheck Logo

谷歌Pixel 6评论。强大的智能手机,更新周期长

回到顶部。 通过Pixel 6,谷歌再次将其旗舰智能手机定位在高端领域;不仅为其提供了独特的设计,而且还提供了完全重新设计的相机设置、首款自制芯片组,以及极长的更新承诺。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G AI Android ARM Google Pixel Smartphone Touchscreen

谷歌不仅在其新的顶级型号中注重大量的高端规格,而且还首次整合了其内部的Tensor芯片组。此外,还再次推出了专业版与Pixel 6一起提供。后者比我们的测试设备要大一些,拥有120赫兹的面板,边框更窄,分辨率更高,内存更大,电池更大,还有一个额外的变焦镜头(48MP,4倍变焦)。

Pixel 6配备了8GB的内存和128GB的内部存储;通过microSD卡的扩展仍然不可用。背面有全新的双摄像头设置,电池容量为4,614毫安时。就价格而言,这款谷歌智能手机的建议零售价为599美元。专业型的128GB版本起价为899美元,另外还有256GB的版本,价格为999美元。

Google Pixel 6 (Pixel 6 Series)
Processor
Google Tensor 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Exynos X1 / Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G78 MP20
Memory
8192 MB 
Display
6.40 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 411 PPI, capacitive, OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110.38 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71), 5G (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 158.6 x 74.8
Battery
4614 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.85, 25 mm, 1/1.31", 1.2 µm, Octa PD, laser AF, OIS) 12 MP (ultra wide, f/2.2, 17 mm, 114°, 1.25 µm), ultra HD video (60 FPS); Camera2 API level: Full
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0, 84°, 1.25 µm, fixed focus)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: on-screen, USB-C cable, OTG adapter, SIM tool, Quick Start guide, 24 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), GLONASS (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B2a), NavIC (L5); head SAR: 1.38 W/kg, body SAR: 1.00 W/kg, DRM Widevine L1, IP68, fanless, waterproof
Weight
207 g
Price
649 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.2 %
12/2021
Google Pixel 6
Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20
207 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.40"2400x1080
89.4 %
02/2021
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14
200 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
87.1 %
02/2021
Xiaomi Mi 11
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
196 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.81"3200x1440
88.6 %
10/2021
Apple iPhone 13
A15, A15 GPU 4-Core
173 g128 GB NVMe6.10"2532x1170
83.6 %
10/2021
Oppo Reno6 5G
Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4
182 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
85.6 %
05/2021
Asus ZenFone 8
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
169 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash5.92"2400x1080

如果你拥有一台 谷歌Pixel 5,你会对新的Pixel 6变得如此之重感到惊讶。它的重量为207克,比前代产品多了56克。这主要是由于更大的尺寸,更大的电池,以及正面和背面的玻璃。两侧的玻璃是康宁大猩猩玻璃Victus。

背面的摄像头也很抢眼。厚厚的摄像头驼峰突出了2.85毫米,令人印象深刻,但它使Pixel 6在平面上保持稳定。在制造质量方面,没有批评的余地。哑光金属框架不容易沾染指纹,但玻璃的情况却不是这样。缝隙尺寸紧密而均匀,当涉及到扭曲的尝试时,谷歌智能手机给人留下了非常坚固的印象。

SIM卡槽的盖子与框架齐平。塑料和金属都被用于卡槽,看起来足够稳定,可以容纳一张纳米SIM卡。Pixel 6获得了IP68认证,因此具有防尘和防水功能。这款手机有暴风黑、海棠色和珊瑚色三种颜色,后者是我们的评测样品。

Size comparison

164.3 mm 74.6 mm 8.06 mm 196 g161.5 mm 75.6 mm 7.8 mm 200 g158.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.9 mm 207 g156.8 mm 72.1 mm 7.6 mm 182 g148 mm 68.5 mm 8.9 mm 169 g146.7 mm 71.5 mm 7.7 mm 173 g144.7 mm 70.4 mm 8 mm 151 g

连接性 - Pixel 6中的USB 3.2

谷歌Pixel配备了一个快速的USB 3.2端口(Gen. 1),可以实现高数据速度并支持OTG,但不支持有线图像输出。蓝牙5.2和NFC也在其中。

除此以外,谷歌通过提供一个非常基本的配置,忠实于前辈的构建。没有支持microSD、通知LED、红外辐射器、无线电接收器或任何类似的东西。

首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
左图:SIM卡
左图:SIM卡
右边。电源,音量摇杆
右边。电源,音量摇杆
底部。扬声器、USB、麦克风
底部。扬声器、USB、麦克风

软件 -Android 12,有5年的更新。

谷歌选择了纯粹的Android 12体验,并以一些独家的Pixel功能为其加分。例如,离线聊天可以被实时翻译成多达55种语言。不幸的是,到目前为止,该功能只限于少数几个应用程序。

魔力橡皮擦是一个工具,可以让你修饰照片中不需要的元素。这通常效果很好,尽管当图像内容比较复杂时,Pixel 6并不总是对修正的区域应用适当的背景填充。

这款谷歌智能手机不仅有DRM认证,而且还搭载了新的编解码器。HDRnet。

Pixel应该至少在三年内收到Android 版本和功能更新,安全更新甚至应该至少部署五年。这个时间框架从Pixel 6被添加到美国谷歌商店时开始。因此,没有什么应该阻碍更新到Android 15。

通信和GNSS--Pixel 6并不是在所有市场上都配备了毫米波。

谷歌Pixel 6可以使用所有常见的移动标准接入移动网络。只有5G在大多数地区被制造商限制在Sub-6范围内。毫米波标准只在美国、日本和澳大利亚可用。考虑到Pixel智能手机的潜在长寿命,这一决定难以理解。根据各种拆解,G9S9B机型中只安装了一根毫米波天线,位于手机的顶部区域。现有标准的频段覆盖面非常广泛,使得Pixel 6有可能在全世界范围内建立移动连接。

通过Wi-Fi 6E,谷歌智能手机支持最现代的WLAN标准。在日常使用中,Pixel以稳定的连接和相当不错的范围给人留下深刻印象。用我们的Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器进行的测试也证实了前者。然而,传输速度有点太低,尤其是发送数据时。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1261 (1192min - 1327max) MBit/s ∼100% +57%
Oppo Reno6 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
938 (925min - 948max) MBit/s ∼74% +17%
Apple iPhone 13
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
833 (794min - 859max) MBit/s ∼66% +4%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
802 (421min - 857max) MBit/s ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
747 (650min - 862max) MBit/s ∼59% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
600 (305min - 657max) MBit/s ∼48% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
519 (391min - 604max) MBit/s ∼41% -35%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
483 (479min - 493max) MBit/s ∼38% -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1395, n=236, last 2 years)
481 MBit/s ∼38% -40%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
903 (446min - 918max) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
895 (870min - 907max) MBit/s ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
855 (827min - 886max) MBit/s ∼95% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
854 (804min - 879max) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
842 (329min - 976max) MBit/s ∼93% -6%
Oppo Reno6 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
810 (784min - 852max) MBit/s ∼90% -9%
Apple iPhone 13
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
715 (672min - 723max) MBit/s ∼79% -20%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
625 (521min - 652max) MBit/s ∼69% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1348, n=236, last 2 years)
469 MBit/s ∼52% -48%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, ARM Mali-G78 MP20; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø894 (870-907)
Apple iPhone 13 Apple A15 Bionic, Apple A15 GPU 4-Core; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø715 (672-723)
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, ARM Mali-G78 MP20; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø788 (421-857)
Apple iPhone 13 Apple A15 Bionic, Apple A15 GPU 4-Core; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø833 (794-859)
GPS测试。室外
户外活动
GPS测试:室内
在室内

卫星信号在户外获得的速度非常快,但它可以更精确一些。谷歌Pixel 6在室内需要的时间更长一些,而且GNSS信号只是非常弱。

在我们短暂的骑车过程中,谷歌手机不得不面对与 Garmin Venu 2.智能手表显示出更准确的路线跟踪,但智能手机的性能足以完成导航任务。

GNSS试骑。湖泊
GNSS试骑。湖泊
全球卫星导航系统试乘。转折点
全球卫星导航系统试乘。转折点
全球卫星导航系统试骑。总结
全球卫星导航系统试骑。总结

电话和通话质量

分屏模式下的电话和短信应用

谷歌Pixel 6可以容纳一张nano SIM卡。想使用双卡的用户可以求助于一个额外的eSIM。支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话等功能。

将谷歌智能手机放在耳边时,语音质量非常好。用户的声音传输非常自然,干扰的背景噪音在短时间内被准确过滤掉,不会导致声音颜色的变化。三个麦克风和实施的算法在这方面做得很好。

免提电话模式的效果并不理想。虽然可以很好地理解Pixel 6的用户,但他们的声音听起来很低沉、很空洞。此外,麦克风的范围也只是一般。

相机--Pixel 6强大的双摄像头设置

用Pixel 6拍摄的自拍
用Pixel 6拍摄的自拍

谷歌Pixel 6的前置摄像头可以很好地自拍。场景检测会立即建议进行人像拍摄,事后还可以进行全面的编辑。尽管缺乏一个巨大的分辨率,但结果看起来详细而均匀。唯一的缺点是缺乏自动对焦功能。

背面有很多变化,因为谷歌多年来第一次更新了主传感器,采用了5千万像素的三星ISOCELL GN1传感器,通过像素分层工作,产生了12.5百万像素的照片。这款镜头在白天绝对引人注目,Pixel 6拍摄的照片细节丰富、色彩一致,不会过分夸张,尤其是在清晰度方面。在低光下的成像性能仍然不错,但它不太符合来自Apple 和三星的对手。夜间模式使情况好一点,但即使如此,上面提到的两个竞争者的细节也更多一点。额外的超广角镜头提供了良好的结果,具有吸引人的景深。不过,当涉及到边缘时,可能会有最小的畸变。

视频可以用超高清录制,最好是每秒60帧。得益于光学图像稳定器(OIS)和额外的电子稳定功能,记录仍然非常流畅。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow light

在受控的照明条件下,谷歌Pixel 6的相机显示出略微偏暖的白平衡,但没有过度。颜色通常显示得更亮一些,但特别是在涉及到蓝色和深色皮肤时,与DeltaE值的偏差有点太高。

我们的测试图被捕捉到了很多细节,即使在周边地区,谷歌智能手机也没有显示出任何弱点。

ColorChecker
15.6 ∆E
5 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
16 ∆E
7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
13 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 6: 7.28 ∆E min: 1.43 - max: 16.03 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.8 ∆E
42.2 ∆E
30.5 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
49.9 ∆E
38 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
46.7 ∆E
50 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
36 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
46.9 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
34.6 ∆E
48.9 ∆E
48.5 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 6: 33.94 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 49.96 ∆E

附件和保修 - 现在不包括充电器

谷歌Pixel 6有24个月的保修期,不能延长或升级。

盒子里的配件不多,因为谷歌不包括充电器。因此,除了智能手机本身之外,盒子里只包括一条USB-C电缆、一个SIM卡工具和一个OTG适配器。制造商提供了一个可选的30瓦充电器(25美元),兼容的塑料或皮套(分别为29美元和49美元),以及Pixel Stand(第二代,79美元),它可以用来为Pixel无线充电。

输入设备和处理 - 指纹传感器迁移到显示屏中

谷歌Pixel 6的电容式触摸屏可识别多达10次的同时点击,并对其作出快速而准确的反应。玻璃表面具有很好的滑行性能,触感非常舒适。我们非常喜欢振动马达,它以清晰的反馈取悦于人。

谷歌最终决定为Android ,提供一个单手模式。这必须先在设置中启用,然后从屏幕的底部边缘简单地向下滑动,就能缩小图像。

与之相比 Pixel 5相比之下,谷歌不再使用位于背面的指纹传感器,而是将其移至显示屏的正面。光学传感器工作可靠,以令人满意的速度解锁智能手机。只有在面板完全关闭的情况下,才需要先将其唤醒,以使传感器变得活跃。

显示屏 - Pixel 6采用令人印象深刻的OLED面板

子像素结构
子像素结构

谷歌Pixel 6有一个6.4英寸(16.26厘米)的OLED显示屏,分辨率为2400x1080像素,像素密度很有吸引力。该面板的工作频率高达90赫兹,但它只能将刷新率降低到60赫兹。对HDR的支持仅限于HLG和HDR10。有一个永远在线的显示屏。

该面板的亮度非常好,在纯白背景和启用环境光传感器的情况下平均约为805cd/m²。它甚至达到了1128cd/m²,亮区和暗区分布均匀(APL50)。如果禁用环境光传感器,最高可达485 cd/m²。

然而,谷歌对OLED的闪烁没有特别好的把握。既没有直流调光模式,也没有类似的东西直接集成到面板的设置中。在最低亮度下,显示屏在176.1赫兹和376.6赫兹之间不稳定地闪动。在更高的亮度下,振幅曲线变得越来越平缓,在最大设置下只在352.1赫兹和376.6赫兹之间波动。这意味着敏感的用户在使用过程中不得不面对不适,即使是可选的夜光模式也只能在有限的范围内提供帮助。

801
cd/m²
805
cd/m²
814
cd/m²
806
cd/m²
805
cd/m²
796
cd/m²
807
cd/m²
810
cd/m²
798
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 814 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 804.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.19 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 805 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29
Google Pixel 6
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Google Pixel 5
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.00
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2400x1080, 6.70
Xiaomi Mi 11
LED DotDisplay, 3200x1440, 6.81
Apple iPhone 13
OLED, 2532x1170, 6.10
Oppo Reno6 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Asus ZenFone 8
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 5.92
Screen
8%
-3%
7%
24%
-42%
-30%
Brightness middle
805
635
-21%
814
1%
840
4%
831
3%
588
-27%
758
-6%
Brightness
805
636
-21%
814
1%
845
5%
830
3%
593
-26%
759
-6%
Brightness Distribution
98
97
-1%
97
-1%
98
0%
98
0%
98
0%
98
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.4
0.8
43%
2
-43%
1.2
14%
0.77
45%
2.6
-86%
3.5
-150%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.7
2.2
41%
3.6
3%
2.7
27%
1.52
59%
4.7
-27%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
1.7
6%
1.4
22%
2
-11%
1.2
33%
3.3
-83%
1.6
11%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.23 99%
2.12 104%
2.26 97%
2.209 100%
2.19 100%
2.23 99%
CCT
6507 100%
6492 100%
6568 99%
6492 100%
6501 100%
6573 99%
6527 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 367.6 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 367.6 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 367.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

色彩再现的准确度略逊于 像素5但这是吹毛求疵,因为偏差仍然很小,只有经过严格训练的眼睛才会在个别情况下注意到它们。

在使用CalMAN的测量中,色彩空间覆盖率比预期的要低一些,因为Pixel 6的目标是扩展的sRGB色彩空间,而不是更常见的DCI-P3。这可能只在必要时使用。

灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
颜色(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
颜色(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.6 ms rise
↘ 3.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

得益于高亮度,在户外使用谷歌Pixel 6时应该几乎没有任何问题,即使是在晴天。此外,环境光传感器的工作方式非常保守,而且随着时间的推移,它还会从用户的微调中学习。

OLED面板的可视角度稳定性同样令人印象深刻。在平坦的可视角度下,只有轻微的亮度损失是明显的。

户外活动
户外活动
谷歌Pixel 6的视角稳定性
谷歌Pixel 6的视角稳定性

性能--Tensor在谷歌的首次亮相就表现出色

Pixel 6是第一款由内部SoC--Google Tensor--驱动的谷歌智能手机。它的架构有点让人想起了 三星Exynos 2100但它有一个额外的Cortex-X1内核,少了一个A76内核。此外,谷歌已经实施了泰坦M2协处理器,据说可以提供额外的安全性;同样,机器学习的算法也应该得到了极大的改善。一个ARM Mali-G78被用作图形单元。相对于 Galaxy S21+然而,它有20个内核,而不是14个。

强大的SoC使其在日常使用中具有吸引人的性能。然而,它排在了骁龙888在基准测试中排名靠后。在CPU的多核性能方面,高通芯片组特别快。GPU的性能则完全不同。虽然3DMark中的旧版OpenGL基准测试显示的结果比使用 Adreno 660而Vulkan API的性能则大多较高。只有在GFXBench中,其性能始终比高通芯片的弱。与Exynos SoC相比,情况类似,这可能是由于热量的发展,我们将在温度部分看到。

就该芯片的人工智能能力而言,AIMark的结果非常令人失望,因为得分很低。在Procyon AI基准测试中,情况看起来有所不同,Tensor与SD888相当。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
1041 Points ∼59%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
598 Points ∼34% -43%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
1100 Points ∼63% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1136 Points ∼65% +9%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
1755 Points ∼100% +69%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
706 Points ∼40% -32%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1124 Points ∼64% +8%
Average Google Tensor
  (1041 - 1057, n=2)
1049 Points ∼60% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=263, last 2 years)
651 Points ∼37% -37%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
2805 Points ∼58%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1635 Points ∼34% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
3364 Points ∼70% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3784 Points ∼79% +35%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
4820 Points ∼100% +72%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2161 Points ∼45% -23%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
3385 Points ∼70% +21%
Average Google Tensor
  (2805 - 2941, n=2)
2873 Points ∼60% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=263, last 2 years)
2147 Points ∼45% -23%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
7701 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
923 Points ∼12% -88%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
6259 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4279 Points ∼56% -44%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2626 Points ∼34% -66%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5771 Points ∼75% -25%
Average Google Tensor
  (7406 - 7701, n=2)
7554 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 8702, n=199, last 2 years)
2484 Points ∼32% -68%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
7514 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4674 Points ∼62%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2571 Points ∼34%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
4676 Points ∼62%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 9069, n=198, last 2 years)
2475 Points ∼33%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
10409 Points ∼63%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
8210 Points ∼50% -21%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
16428 Points ∼100% +58%
Average Google Tensor
  (10409 - 11605, n=2)
11007 Points ∼67% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=133, last 2 years)
10130 Points ∼62% -3%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
7344 Points ∼71%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3915 Points ∼38% -47%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
7718 Points ∼74% +5%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
5061 Points ∼49% -31%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
10379 Points ∼100% +41%
Average Google Tensor
  (7344 - 9654, n=2)
8499 Points ∼82% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 13121, n=241, last 2 years)
4806 Points ∼46% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
11005 Points ∼70%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4036 Points ∼26% -63%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
9794 Points ∼63% -11%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
6021 Points ∼38% -45%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
15652 Points ∼100% +42%
Average Google Tensor
  (11005 - 15556, n=2)
13281 Points ∼85% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=241, last 2 years)
6602 Points ∼42% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
3393 Points ∼71%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3544 Points ∼74% +4%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
3248 Points ∼68% -4%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
4763 Points ∼100% +40%
Average Google Tensor
  (3393 - 4147, n=2)
3770 Points ∼79% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=239, last 2 years)
3202 Points ∼67% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
6606 Points ∼71%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2964 Points ∼32% -55%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
8001 Points ∼86% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
9343 Points ∼100% +41%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
5713 Points ∼61% -14%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
3875 Points ∼41% -41%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
8779 Points ∼94% +33%
Average Google Tensor
  (6606 - 7742, n=2)
7174 Points ∼77% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11528, n=245, last 2 years)
3932 Points ∼42% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
8605 Points ∼72%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2834 Points ∼24% -67%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
10913 Points ∼91% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12023 Points ∼100% +40%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
9878 Points ∼82% +15%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
4068 Points ∼34% -53%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
11552 Points ∼96% +34%
Average Google Tensor
  (8605 - 10733, n=2)
9669 Points ∼80% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 19364, n=245, last 2 years)
4831 Points ∼40% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
3643 Points ∼69%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3530 Points ∼67% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
4137 Points ∼79% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5249 Points ∼100% +44%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
2307 Points ∼44% -37%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
3324 Points ∼63% -9%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
4771 Points ∼91% +31%
Average Google Tensor
  (3643 - 3919, n=2)
3781 Points ∼72% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=245, last 2 years)
3213 Points ∼61% -12%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
6954 Points ∼79%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1015 Points ∼12% -85%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
5668 Points ∼64% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5599 Points ∼64% -19%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
8788 Points ∼100% +26%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2031 Points ∼23% -71%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5767 Points ∼66% -17%
Average Google Tensor
  (6516 - 6954, n=2)
6735 Points ∼77% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=170, last 2 years)
3262 Points ∼37% -53%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
7064 Points ∼71%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1022 Points ∼10% -86%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
6010 Points ∼60% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5678 Points ∼57% -20%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
9979 Points ∼100% +41%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2001 Points ∼20% -72%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5821 Points ∼58% -18%
Average Google Tensor
  (7057 - 7064, n=2)
7061 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=168, last 2 years)
3351 Points ∼34% -53%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
2067 Points ∼84%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
448 Points ∼18% -78%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
2470 Points ∼100% +19%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
593 Points ∼24% -71%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1528 Points ∼62% -26%
Average Google Tensor
  (1973 - 2067, n=2)
2020 Points ∼82% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102 - 3080, n=122, last 2 years)
995 Points ∼40% -52%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
1823 Points ∼79%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
443 Points ∼19% -76%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
2313 Points ∼100% +27%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
579 Points ∼25% -68%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1512 Points ∼65% -17%
Average Google Tensor
  (1823 - 1998, n=2)
1911 Points ∼83% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=119, last 2 years)
973 Points ∼42% -47%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
90 fps ∼75%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
45 fps ∼38% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
119 fps ∼99% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
120 fps ∼100% +33%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
60.1 fps ∼50% -33%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
60 fps ∼50% -33%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
119 fps ∼99% +32%
Average Google Tensor
  (90 - 101, n=2)
95.5 fps ∼80% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.5 - 143, n=204, last 2 years)
67.5 fps ∼56% -25%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
144 fps ∼35%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
48 fps ∼12% -67%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
242 fps ∼58% +68%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
268 fps ∼64% +86%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
416.3 fps ∼100% +189%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
97 fps ∼23% -33%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
238 fps ∼57% +65%
Average Google Tensor
  (125 - 144, n=2)
134.5 fps ∼32% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 428, n=204, last 2 years)
133.6 fps ∼32% -7%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
79 fps ∼66%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
30 fps ∼25% -62%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
119 fps ∼100% +51%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
91 fps ∼76% +15%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
60.2 fps ∼51% -24%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
52 fps ∼44% -34%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
116 fps ∼97% +47%
Average Google Tensor
  (65 - 79, n=2)
72 fps ∼61% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 121, n=203, last 2 years)
54.5 fps ∼46% -31%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
90 fps ∼41%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
31 fps ∼14% -66%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
161 fps ∼74% +79%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
158 fps ∼73% +76%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
217.4 fps ∼100% +142%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
61 fps ∼28% -32%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
152 fps ∼70% +69%
Average Google Tensor
  (89 - 90, n=2)
89.5 fps ∼41% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.4 - 251, n=204, last 2 years)
76.8 fps ∼35% -15%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
57 fps ∼55%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼20% -63%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
103 fps ∼100% +81%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
59 fps ∼57% +4%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
60.1 fps ∼58% +5%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
35 fps ∼34% -39%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
93 fps ∼90% +63%
Average Google Tensor
  (42 - 57, n=2)
49.5 fps ∼48% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 121, n=203, last 2 years)
42 fps ∼41% -26%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
60 fps ∼43%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
22 fps ∼16% -63%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
107 fps ∼77% +78%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
111 fps ∼80% +85%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
138.6 fps ∼100% +131%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
40 fps ∼29% -33%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
105 fps ∼76% +75%
Average Google Tensor
  (60 - 65, n=2)
62.5 fps ∼45% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 169, n=204, last 2 years)
51.9 fps ∼37% -13%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
36 fps ∼62%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼22% -64%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
56 fps ∼96% +56%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
33 fps ∼56% -8%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
58.5 fps ∼100% +63%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
20 fps ∼34% -44%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
53 fps ∼91% +47%
Average Google Tensor
  (30 - 36, n=2)
33 fps ∼56% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 81, n=203, last 2 years)
26.5 fps ∼45% -26%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
40 fps ∼41%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
12 fps ∼12% -70%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
62 fps ∼64% +55%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
67 fps ∼69% +68%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
96.6 fps ∼100% +142%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
24 fps ∼25% -40%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
61 fps ∼63% +53%
Average Google Tensor
  (40 - 48, n=2)
44 fps ∼46% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=203, last 2 years)
31.4 fps ∼33% -21%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
47 fps ∼73%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼20% -72%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
64 fps ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
41 fps ∼64% -13%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
23 fps ∼36% -51%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
57 fps ∼89% +21%
Average Google Tensor
  (43 - 47, n=2)
45 fps ∼70% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 98, n=260, last 2 years)
27.8 fps ∼43% -41%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
49 fps ∼43%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼12% -73%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
64 fps ∼57% +31%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
79 fps ∼70% +61%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
112.9 fps ∼100% +130%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
26 fps ∼23% -47%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
64 fps ∼57% +31%
Average Google Tensor
  (49 - 69, n=2)
59 fps ∼52% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2 - 257, n=261, last 2 years)
33.3 fps ∼29% -32%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
40 fps ∼73%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.8 fps ∼16% -78%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
44 fps ∼80% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
25 fps ∼46% -37%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
54.9 fps ∼100% +37%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
15 fps ∼27% -62%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
41 fps ∼75% +3%
Average Google Tensor
  (32 - 40, n=2)
36 fps ∼66% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=261, last 2 years)
19.1 fps ∼35% -52%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
23 fps ∼62%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5.3 fps ∼14% -77%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
27 fps ∼73% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
29 fps ∼78% +26%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
37.2 fps ∼100% +62%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
10 fps ∼27% -57%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
26 fps ∼70% +13%
Average Google Tensor
  (23 - 30, n=2)
26.5 fps ∼71% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 101, n=261, last 2 years)
12.8 fps ∼34% -44%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
702981 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
813876 Points ∼100% +16%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
424921 Points ∼52% -40%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
795730 Points ∼98% +13%
Average Google Tensor
  (702981 - 720905, n=2)
711943 Points ∼87% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1041980, n=102, last 2 years)
550205 Points ∼68% -22%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
611484 Points ∼87%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
288970 Points ∼41% -53%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
617805 Points ∼88% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
700592 Points ∼100% +15%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
362407 Points ∼52% -41%
Average Google Tensor
 
611484 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (77514 - 727247, n=144, last 2 years)
358398 Points ∼51% -41%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
7495 Score ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Score ∼0% -100%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
4639 Score ∼62% -38%
Average Google Tensor
 
7495 Score ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 7649, n=47, last 2 years)
3018 Score ∼40% -60%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
5723 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
226728 Points ∼100% +3862%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
209984 Points ∼93% +3569%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
105623 Points ∼47% +1746%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
41400 Points ∼18% +623%
Average Google Tensor
  (5723 - 5782, n=2)
5753 Points ∼3% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=121, last 2 years)
63547 Points ∼28% +1010%
Basemark GPU 1.2
1280x720 OpenGL Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
38.8 (5.81min - 74.76max) fps ∼19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (38.8 - 361, n=9, last 2 years)
203 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
97.9 (12.65min - 163.5max) fps ∼100%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
27.25 (3.12min - 46.18max) fps ∼28% -72%
Average Google Tensor
 
97.9 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.7 - 1203, n=53, last 2 years)
57.5 fps ∼59% -41%
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
87.8 (11.09min - 157.62max) fps ∼100%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
25.18 (5.01min - 43.15max) fps ∼29% -71%
Average Google Tensor
 
87.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 1905, n=52, last 2 years)
68.7 fps ∼78% -22%
1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
282.4 (96.55min - 3557.1max) fps ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
fps ∼0% -100%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
36.24 (8.76min - 87.97max) fps ∼9% -87%
Average Google Tensor
 
282 fps ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (29.8 - 7929, n=45, last 2 years)
399 fps ∼100% +41%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
88.8 (17.35min - 206.76max) fps ∼100%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
25.38 (5.93min - 44.29max) fps ∼29% -71%
Average Google Tensor
 
88.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.79 - 1082, n=50, last 2 years)
58.7 fps ∼66% -34%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
79.3 (14.05min - 141.25max) fps ∼100%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
23.05 (7.18min - 39.2max) fps ∼29% -71%
Average Google Tensor
 
79.3 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11.2 - 1709, n=50, last 2 years)
66.1 fps ∼83% -17%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
6287 Points ∼99%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3290 Points ∼52% -48%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
6144 Points ∼97% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6361 Points ∼100% +1%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
3817 Points ∼60% -39%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
6043 Points ∼95% -4%
Average Google Tensor
  (6053 - 6287, n=2)
6170 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (895 - 8124, n=181, last 2 years)
4139 Points ∼65% -34%
System (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
9085 Points ∼87%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5960 Points ∼57% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
10492 Points ∼100% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
10377 Points ∼99% +14%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
8625 Points ∼82% -5%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
9973 Points ∼95% +10%
Average Google Tensor
  (9009 - 9085, n=2)
9047 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1542 - 19657, n=181, last 2 years)
7346 Points ∼70% -19%
Memory (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
6071 Points ∼69%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5381 Points ∼61% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
6246 Points ∼71% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
8789 Points ∼100% +45%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
5612 Points ∼64% -8%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
6300 Points ∼72% +4%
Average Google Tensor
  (6071 - 6336, n=2)
6204 Points ∼71% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1012 - 9044, n=181, last 2 years)
4781 Points ∼54% -21%
Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
15303 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2560 Points ∼17% -83%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
14636 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12732 Points ∼83% -17%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
4311 Points ∼28% -72%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
13167 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Google Tensor
  (13319 - 15303, n=2)
14311 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (478 - 25642, n=181, last 2 years)
7022 Points ∼46% -54%
Web (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
1851 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1428 Points ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
1486 Points ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1434 Points ∼77% -23%
Oppo Reno6 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
1017 Points ∼55% -45%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1612 Points ∼87% -13%
Average Google Tensor
  (1765 - 1851, n=2)
1808 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (718 - 2392, n=181, last 2 years)
1374 Points ∼74% -26%
CrossMark
Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
849 Points ∼97%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
437 Points ∼50% -49%
Average Google Tensor
  (849 - 906, n=2)
878 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (226 - 1169, n=44, last 2 years)
740 Points ∼84% -13%
Productivity (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
866 Points ∼97%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
490 Points ∼55% -43%
Average Google Tensor
  (866 - 926, n=2)
896 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (37 - 1140, n=44, last 2 years)
726 Points ∼81% -16%
Creativity (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
825 Points ∼98%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
370 Points ∼44% -55%
Average Google Tensor
  (825 - 867, n=2)
846 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (201 - 1321, n=44, last 2 years)
749 Points ∼89% -9%
Responsiveness (sort by value)
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
867 Points ∼94%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
511 Points ∼56% -41%
Average Google Tensor
  (867 - 968, n=2)
918 Points ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (227 - 1213, n=44, last 2 years)
740 Points ∼81% -15%

谷歌Pixel 6的浏览器速度没有留下任何可以批评的空间。网站的加载速度很快,可以流畅地滚动浏览。这款智能手机在大多数基准测试中表现非常好;只有iPhone处于同一水平线上。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
180 Points ∼100% +100%
Average Google Tensor (90.1 - 91.7, n=2)
90.9 Points ∼51% +1%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
90.1 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
83.2 Points ∼46% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
66.3 Points ∼37% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182.6, n=178, last 2 years)
60 Points ∼33% -33%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
50.8 Points ∼28% -44%
Oppo Reno6 5G (Chrome 93)
50.5 Points ∼28% -44%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
399.8 Points ∼100% +122%
Average Google Tensor (180.4 - 189.6, n=2)
185 Points ∼46% +3%
Asus ZenFone 8 (Chrome 90)
184.5 Points ∼46% +2%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
180.4 Points ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
137.9 Points ∼34% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
117.8 Points ∼29% -35%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=185, last 2 years)
111.4 Points ∼28% -38%
Oppo Reno6 5G (Chrome 93)
105.7 Points ∼26% -41%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
88.9 Points ∼22% -51%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
244 runs/min ∼100% +135%
Average Google Tensor (104 - 111, n=2)
107.5 runs/min ∼44% +3%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
104 runs/min ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
85.8 runs/min ∼35% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
62.8 runs/min ∼26% -40%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=163, last 2 years)
59.2 runs/min ∼24% -43%
Oppo Reno6 5G (Chrome 93)
49.5 runs/min ∼20% -52%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
49.2 runs/min ∼20% -53%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
219 Points ∼100% +99%
Asus ZenFone 8 (Chrome 90)
149 Points ∼68% +35%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
124 Points ∼57% +13%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
110 Points ∼50%
Average Google Tensor (105 - 110, n=2)
107.5 Points ∼49% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
102 Points ∼47% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 265, n=190, last 2 years)
89.9 Points ∼41% -18%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
77 Points ∼35% -30%
Oppo Reno6 5G (Chrome 93)
65 Points ∼30% -41%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
62664 Points ∼100% +44%
Average Google Tensor (43376 - 44034, n=2)
43705 Points ∼70% +1%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
43376 Points ∼69%
Asus ZenFone 8 (Chrome 90)
37926 Points ∼61% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
28247 Points ∼45% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
27539 Points ∼44% -37%
Oppo Reno6 5G (Chrome 93)
25580 Points ∼41% -41%
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=194, last 2 years)
22238 Points ∼35% -49%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
18629 Points ∼30% -57%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 15230, n=196, last 2 years)
3268 ms * ∼100% -216%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
2470 ms * ∼76% -139%
Oppo Reno6 5G (Chrome 93)
1790 ms * ∼55% -73%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
1744 ms * ∼53% -69%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
1722 ms * ∼53% -67%
Asus ZenFone 8 (Chrome 90)
1397 ms * ∼43% -35%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
1034 ms * ∼32%
Average Google Tensor (915 - 1034, n=2)
975 ms * ∼30% +6%
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
413.6 ms * ∼13% +60%

* ... smaller is better

正如预期的那样,UFS 3.1存储的速度很高,但它几乎在每个方面都落后于竞争对手。只有在连续读取时才能达到标准的传输速率。

Google Pixel 6Asus ZenFone 8Samsung Galaxy S21+Xiaomi Mi 11Google Pixel 5Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
105%
136%
100%
-18%
82%
12%
Sequential Read 256KB
1546
1781
15%
1623
5%
1615
4%
851
-45%
1567 ?(1030 - 1898, n=34)
1%
891 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=260, last 2 years)
-42%
Sequential Write 256KB
233.4
767
229%
1037
344%
754
223%
190
-19%
752 ?(233 - 1095, n=34)
222%
430 ?(11.9 - 1465, n=260, last 2 years)
84%
Random Read 4KB
126.2
292.3
132%
309.6
145%
278.5
121%
138.9
10%
232 ?(126.2 - 322, n=34)
84%
158.5 ?(13.5 - 325, n=260, last 2 years)
26%
Random Write 4KB
190.3
272.9
43%
283.3
49%
289.3
52%
155.9
-18%
232 ?(121.4 - 323, n=34)
22%
151.3 ?(5.5 - 449, n=260, last 2 years)
-20%

游戏--流畅的游戏,有小的限制

ARM Mali-G78 MP20拥有充足的计算能力,因此不必担心Play Store的任何游戏。在我们用GameBench进行的游戏测试中,谷歌Pixel 6在高细节水平上也显示出稳定的游戏性能。.相应的标题在90赫兹下的运行甚至比在其他智能手机上更流畅一些。

然而,我们无法为PUBG Mobile等高要求的游戏选择超高清设置;HDR是极限。即使是我们测试的高清设置,也只能运行在40FPS。其他竞争对手在这方面通常提供60 FPS。

游戏仪表板是一项新功能,允许用户直接在YouTube上流媒体游戏或优化性能设置。然而,该功能隐藏在 "请勿打扰 "设置下,并且在测试时只对少数游戏进行了优化。

死亡扳机2
死亡扳机2
神庙逃亡2
神庙逃亡2
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
游戏仪表板
游戏仪表板
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
; Dead Trigger 2; 1.8.9: Ø84.6 (78-89)
; PUBG Mobile; 1.7.0: Ø40 (39-41)
; Temple Run 2; 1.83.0: Ø89.7 (60-91)

排放--热能开发减缓了张量芯片的速度

温度

谷歌Pixel 6的表面温度在空闲使用时保持令人愉快的低水平。负载下的温度明显升高,但智能手机并没有变得令人不舒服的温度。

3DMark压力测试显示,Tensor SoC在长时间的负载下会出大汗。显著的相似之处是三星的Exynos芯片也可以在这里的图表中观察到。在这两种情况下,性能下降了约50%。

不幸的是,我们不能在这里介绍GFXBench电池测试的结果,因为该应用程序在试图显示它们时总是崩溃。

Max. Load
 34.9 °C35.6 °C35.7 °C 
 37.5 °C37.7 °C37.1 °C 
 36.8 °C38.8 °C36.4 °C 
Maximum: 38.8 °C
Average: 36.7 °C
36.4 °C37.3 °C37.1 °C
36.8 °C38.2 °C37.4 °C
35.4 °C36.9 °C37.3 °C
Maximum: 38.2 °C
Average: 37 °C
Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life stress test

0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø8.78 (7.06-12.9)
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.1 (12.3-16)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø8.98 (7.01-11.7)
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø27.5 (22.2-41.9)
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø47 (44.5-55.5)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø25.4 (22.3-34.4)

发言人

谷歌Pixel 6的两个扬声器提供了非常体面的声音,尽管有一些竞争对手能提供更丰富的体验。特别是在低中音方面,Pixel的声音有点弱,但这只在高音量时才会让人讨厌。

USB-C可用于有线声音输出,但你可能需要单独购买相应的音频插孔适配器。通过蓝牙连接的设备可以使用SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD和LDAC编码。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.830.8252423.43116.121.14027.621.15032.334.46323.422.6802217.31002222.51252137.116017.949.120013.350.525015.254.431513.252.640011.554.250012.262.763012.368.580013.372.9100014.575125012.273.9160011.274200011.773.6250012.172.4315012.773.6400013.678.3500013.179.1630013.671.2800013.168.31000013.672.71250013.671.11600013.561SPL2586.3N0.665.8median 13.3median 71.1Delta1.29.629.53833.134.327.42831.331.730.332.729.628.924.124.520.730.417.639.414.845.712.34912.853.410.453.9957.611.363.214.464.817.166.31469.110.471.29.472.310.67111.473.813.676.713.768.215.370.715.467.716.66717.67017.366.917.662.726.383.20.754.5median 14median 66.92.88.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGoogle Pixel 6Apple iPhone 13
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Google Pixel 6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 13 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命 - 良好,但不突出

能源消耗

事实证明,谷歌Pixel 6在空闲使用时非常节俭,但在负载情况下,消耗会大大增加。特别是与iPhone 13的对比表明,在这方面有可能做得更好。

谷歌并没有随智能手机提供充电器,但Pixel 6支持高达21瓦的有线充电,制造商建议使用符合PD 3.0标准的电源适配器。 无线方式也支持高达21瓦的充电,但这是为Pixel Stand(第二代)保留的,因为其他Qi充电器只能为谷歌智能手机提供高达12瓦的电量。Pixel 6还可以为其他设备进行无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.06 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.68 / 1 / 1.02 Watt
Load midlight 5.39 / 9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Google Pixel 6
4614 mAh
Google Pixel 5
4080 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21+
4800 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11
4600 mAh
Apple iPhone 13
3240 mAh
Oppo Reno6 5G
4300 mAh
Asus ZenFone 8
4000 mAh
Average Google Tensor
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
27%
-18%
-72%
3%
-44%
0%
-4%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
0.68
0.69
-1%
0.74
-9%
1.57
-131%
0.6
12%
1.13
-66%
0.82
-21%
0.69 ?(0.68 - 0.7, n=2)
-1%
0.915 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=206, last 2 years)
-35%
Idle Average *
1
0.82
18%
1.27
-27%
1.92
-92%
1
-0%
2.09
-109%
1.1
-10%
1 ?(1 - 1, n=2)
-0%
1.702 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=206, last 2 years)
-70%
Idle Maximum *
1.02
0.85
17%
1.33
-30%
1.94
-90%
1.3
-27%
2.15
-111%
1.16
-14%
1.03 ?(1.02 - 1.04, n=2)
-1%
1.931 ?(0.69 - 4, n=206, last 2 years)
-89%
Load Average *
5.39
2.73
49%
6.32
-17%
6.32
-17%
4.5
17%
3.71
31%
4.24
21%
6.13 ?(5.39 - 6.87, n=2)
-14%
4.47 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=206, last 2 years)
17%
Load Maximum *
9
4.4
51%
9.61
-7%
11.65
-29%
7.8
13%
6.06
33%
6.83
24%
9.44 ?(9 - 9.87, n=2)
-5%
7.33 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=206, last 2 years)
19%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor: Ø5.28 (0.821-10.1)
Apple iPhone 13 Apple A15 Bionic: Ø4.54 (0.574-10.7)

Energy consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)