小米 Pad 6 Max 14 平板电脑评测 - 价格仅为三星Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 的一半的替代品

Name: Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Brand: Xiaomi

中档价格，高档感觉。 小米 Pad 6 Max 是三星Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 的一个令人兴奋的替代品，然而，小米平板电脑的价格只有 Tab S9 Ultra 的一半。14 英寸的 Pad 6 Max 配备了骁龙 8+ 第一代处理器，尽管性价比很高，但却存在一个重大缺陷。

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/29/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Touchscreen Tablet Android

大型平板电脑的粉丝们正在寻找一种廉价的平板电脑替代品。三星Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra或联想 Tab Extreme的平板电脑爱好者将大饱眼福。Pad 6 Max 是小米迄今为止最大的平板电脑，配备 14 英寸 IPS 显示屏，刷新率高达 120Hz。

这款小米平板电脑配备高通骁龙 8+ 第一代处理器。最高可配备 16 GB 内存和 1 TB UFS 3.1 存储空间。小米 Pad 6 Max 的基本版本配备 8 GB DDR5x 内存和 256 GB 闪存，进口售价约为 670 美元。这款 XXL 平板电脑不太可能在全球上市。

Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Pad 6 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 730

Memory

12 GB

Display

14.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 243 PPI, capacitive touchscreen , native pen support, IPS LCD, 240 Hz touch rate, Dolby Vision, HDR10, HDR10+, HGL, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 461 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, hall, OTG, Miracast

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6.53 x 318.58 x 206.1

Battery

10000 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, Video 4K@30/60fps) + 2 MPix (f/2.4, depth), Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.2, 1/3.4", 0.8µm, ToF sensor)

Additional features

Speakers: Quad-Audio-System, Keyboard: Onscreen, charger, USB cable, info material, MIUI 14, 12 Months Warranty, widevine L1, fanless

Weight

750 g, Power Supply: 105 g

Price

650 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
89.1 %	09/2023	Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	750 g	6.53 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
90.6 %	09/2023	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740	732 g	5.5 mm	14.60"	2960x1848
88.8 %	08/2023	Lenovo Tab Extreme Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10	740 g	7.2 mm	14.50"	3000x1876
91.8 %	11/2022	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2, M2 10-Core GPU	682 g	6.4 mm	12.90"	2732x2048

案例 - 采用大猩猩玻璃的小米平板电脑

与 Pad 6 相比，小米并未对该设备的设计进行任何大的改动。Pad 6.由于采用了一体式机身设计，Max 版平板电脑给人一种高品质的感觉，尽管它的厚度略高于Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra.Pad 6 Max 厚度为 6.53 毫米，重 750 克，没有官方 IP 认证。

正面全部采用康宁大猩猩 5 号玻璃，与金属边框平滑过渡。14 英寸 IPS 显示屏侧面的边框大小适中，这也体现在该设备 87% 的良好显示屏尺寸比上。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Tab Extreme Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - 小米 Pad 6 Max 配备 USB 3.2

小米平板 6 Max 可以使用快速 USB 3.2 连接（第一代）。在适配器的帮助下，您还可以使用该端口将图片输出到外部屏幕。在我们使用已连接的 M.2 固态硬盘（三星 980 Pro）进行的复制测试中，USB 连接的传输速率达到了 292 MB/s。Pad 6 Max 支持 exFAT 和 NTFS 数据系统，后者是微软系统的首选。

小米平板电脑的存储空间无法扩展，因此在选择存储空间大小时应注意这一点。不过，如果使用平板电脑底部的 USB Type-C 接口，可以通过 U 盘读取数据。例如，这可以用来播放视频。

软件 - 配备Android 13 的小米平板电脑

Pad 6 Max 的操作系统基于谷歌的Android （13 版），在测试时，最新的安全补丁已经更新（2023 年 9 月）。制造商在上面运行自己的 MIUI for Pad（版本 14）。目前尚不清楚这款中国独有的小米平板电脑将在多长时间内提供安全更新和Android 版本。

由于 Pad 6 Max 专为中国市场打造，因此软件不支持任何谷歌服务，系统语言也只能选择中文和英文。不过，在购买该设备后，你可以安装包括 PlayStore 在内的所有谷歌应用程序。

通信 - 小米 Pad 6 Max 配备 WiFi 6

当连接到家庭 WLAN 时，小米平板电脑支持快速 WiFi 6。结合我们的参考路由器（华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000），平均传输速率超过 900 MBit/s。

在无线连接方面，这款平板电脑支持蓝牙（5.3 版）--这款笔记本电脑没有 NFC 芯片，也无法购买 5G 版本。GNSS 模块也是如此。

Networking
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	957 (min: 890) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	946 (min: 488) MBit/s ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	738 (min: 702) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	952 (min: 490) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	806 (min: 614) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	956 (min: 876) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1635 (min: 1256) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1132 (min: 682) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000	442 (min: 222) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	486 (min: 175) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	747 (min: 145) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	702 (min: 225) MBit/s ∼62%

Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø942 (890-975)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø737 (702-792)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø930 (488-984)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø936 (490-980)

摄像头 - 拥有 5000 万像素的小米平板电脑

显示屏的上边框装有一个 2000 万像素的前置摄像头。安装的索尼 IMX596 传感器采用 f/2.2 光圈，只能进行全高清视频录制，而主摄像头则可以选择 4K30。Pad 6 Max 的自拍效果有些过于平滑，而且光照效果也不尽如人意。

小米平板电脑的背面配备了一个高分辨率的 5000 万像素镜头，光圈为 f/1.8。对于这个价位的平板电脑来说，它能拍出不错的照片，尤其是在光线条件好和使用全分辨率的情况下。遗憾的是，照片边缘的锐度稍有下降，动态效果也可能更好一些。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angle Wide-angle Zoom 5x Low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

交货和保修范围 - 小米 Pad 6 Max 随附电源

平板电脑的供货范围包括一条 USB 线缆和一个带 Type-A 接口的 67 瓦模块电源。此外，TradingShenzhen 还为我们提供了测试所需的欧盟适配器，但这并不包括在正常的交货范围内。它只是作为借给我们设备的公司的一项服务功能。小米还为这款中端平板电脑提供了可选的带触控板的键盘保护套（进口价约 150 美元）和触控笔（进口价约 90 美元）。

保修期为 12 个月。我们的测试设备来自深圳贸易公司，如果需要保修，我们还可以选择将 Pad 6 Max 寄到德国地址。

输入设备和操作 - 小米平板电脑具有 FaceUnlock 功能

在 14 英寸 IPS 面板上，手指输入的识别速度非常快。由于采用了 120Hz 的刷新率，触摸屏可以精确操作，动画显示流畅。此外，Pad 6 Max 还可以通过手写笔进行操作，手写笔可以识别 8192 级压力和倾斜度。

通过生物指纹识别技术解锁小米平板电脑既快速又可靠。机身左侧的开/关机按钮位置有点不同寻常。你还可以使用前置摄像头和 ToF 传感器通过面部识别来验证用户身份。在日常使用和光线条件良好的情况下，它的工作非常可靠，但并不那么安全（2D 方法）。

显示屏 - 刷新率达 120Hz 的小米平板电脑

Pad 6 Max 的对角线长度为 14 英寸，宽高比为 16:10。约 35.5 厘米的 IPS 面板像素密度为 243 PPI，在我们的测量中，其最大亮度为 630 cd/m²。我们的实际 APL18 测量（模拟面板上亮区和暗区的均匀分布）得出的数值几乎相同，均为 628 cd/m²。所提供的亮度非常好，但 HDR 内容在认证显示屏上的显示效果并不理想。

在示波器下，我们发现了持续的高频闪烁。由于其频率极高，即使是对 PWM 敏感的用户也不会有问题。


594 cd/m²	617 cd/m²	589 cd/m²
603 cd/m²	630 cd/m²	615 cd/m²
562 cd/m²	533 cd/m²	575 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 630 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 590.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.67 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 630 cd/m²
Contrast: 768:1 (Black: 0.82 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2

	Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 IPS LCD, 2880x1800, 14.00	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED, 2960x1848, 14.60	Lenovo Tab Extreme OLED, 3000x1876, 14.50	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Mini-LED, 2732x2048, 12.90
Screen		-103%	-189%	-81%
Brightness middle	630	621 -1%	479 -24%	611 -3%
Brightness	591	620 5%	456 -23%	605 2%
Brightness Distribution	85	98 15%	90 6%	92 8%
Black Level *	0.82
Contrast	768
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.6	1.9 -217%	3.2 -433%	1.4 -133%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	1	4.6 -360%	6.82 -582%	3.3 -230%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1	1.6 -60%	1.8 -80%	2.3 -130%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.12 ^104%	2.28 ^96%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	6624 ^98%	6602 ^98%	6794 ^96%	6930 ^94%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

130500 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 130500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 130500 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Pad 6 Max 的色彩描绘比Pad 6.您无法用肉眼识别色彩偏差，我们测量了理想的灰度 DeltaE 值(<3)。我们使用 "Original Color Pro "配置文件实现了这一色彩精确度。

显示屏的黑色值并不出众，平均对比度低于 1:1000。APL18 中的黑色值甚至更高，为 0.85 cd/m²

色彩准确度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：Original Color Pro，暖色调）

色彩空间（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：Original Color Pro，暖色调）

灰度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：Original Color Pro，暖色）

色彩饱和度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：Original Color Pro，暖色调）

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
13.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.856 ms rise
13.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.03 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28.76 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9.342 ms rise
28.76 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.42 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

在室外，你通常可以很好地阅读小米平板电脑。如果天气非常晴朗，屏幕的清晰度可能会有些问题，因为 Pad 6 Max 的最大亮度虽然不错，但并没有足够的储备来压制反光。

屏幕的视角稳定性非常好，即使是平视也只会导致亮度略有下降。色彩没有出现任何倒置现象。

性能 - 小米平板电脑采用高通 SoC 芯片

该设备配备功能强大的Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1配备Adreno 730在日常使用中，系统运行速度快，操作流畅。我们的基准测试结果表明，这款平板电脑的性能非常强劲，有时甚至比联想 Tab Extreme 还要好。联想 Tab Extreme采用联发科 Dimensity 9000特别是在 GFXBench 的熄屏率测试中，甚至比联想 Tab Extreme 的骁龙 8 代 2Galaxy在三星Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra由于 Pad 6 Max 的高一致性，有时不得不认输。

Geekbench 6.2
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	5534 Points +18%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	4690 Points
Lenovo Tab Extreme	4513 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4140 - 4690, n=5)	4483 Points -4%
Average of class Tablet (493 - 5652, n=44, last 2 years)	2287 Points -51%
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	2079 Points +16%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	1798 Points
Lenovo Tab Extreme	1777 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1530 - 1806, n=5)	1719 Points -4%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 2107, n=44, last 2 years)	812 Points -55%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	1890 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	1598 Points +15%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	1389 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (897 - 1389, n=23)	1280 Points -8%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	1217 Points -12%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=68, last 2 years)	664 Points -52%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	8524 Points +95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	4989 Points +14%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	4367 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3782 - 4436, n=23)	4173 Points -4%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	3736 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=68, last 2 years)	2362 Points -46%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	1416727 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	1112212 Points +17%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	1005158 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (782013 - 1119358, n=21)	997518 Points +5%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	950385 Points
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=52, last 2 years)	453858 Points -52%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	16584 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	15983 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (11029 - 17727, n=22)	14796 Points -11%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	13407 Points -19%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=65, last 2 years)	8736 Points -47%

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	1584 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	1263 Points +15%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	1098 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (749 - 1178, n=21)	1033 Points -6%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	948 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1585, n=51, last 2 years)	672 Points -39%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	8784 Points +16%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	7589 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (5642 - 8753, n=21)	7507 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	7255 Points -4%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=52, last 2 years)	3631 Points -52%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	Points -100%
System
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	12132 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (8750 - 13563, n=21)	11842 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	9398 Points -23%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=52, last 2 years)	6543 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	1374 Points -89%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	8738 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	8726 Points
Lenovo Tab Extreme	7900 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3871 - 9114, n=21)	7549 Points -13%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 8890, n=52, last 2 years)	4284 Points -51%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	31738 Points +59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (16742 - 26660, n=21)	21295 Points +7%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	19973 Points
Lenovo Tab Extreme	19574 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=52, last 2 years)	6639 Points -67%
Web
Lenovo Tab Extreme	1907 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1198 - 2006, n=21)	1713 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	1584 Points +1%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	1574 Points
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=52, last 2 years)	1205 Points -23%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (887 - 128240, n=9)	29608 Points +2208%
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=39, last 2 years)	5325 Points +315%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	1283 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	1273 Points -1%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3291 - 84787, n=19)	47040 Points +242%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	30392 Points +121%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	15986 Points +16%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	13748 Points
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=49, last 2 years)	8899 Points -35%

Legend

Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

Lenovo Tab Extreme MediaTek Dimensity 9000, ARM Mali-G710 MP10, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1

Average of class Tablet

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	6909 Points +181%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3489 Points +42%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2463 Points
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2361 Points -4%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	6919 Points +178%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3563 Points +43%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2488 Points
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2345 Points -6%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	25317 Points +159%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14789 Points +51%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9785 Points
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8621 Points -12%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7834 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14098 Points +18%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11937 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	24172 Points +37%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17683 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5748 Points +2%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5647 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -1%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	873 fps +95%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	447 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	421 fps -6%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	294 fps -34%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	120 fps +3%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	116 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	105 fps -9%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	104 fps -10%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	494 fps +86%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	265 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	226 fps -15%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	217 fps -18%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	115 fps +49%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	77 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	76 fps -1%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps -18%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	340 fps +94%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	175 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	169 fps -3%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	149 fps -15%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	89 fps +107%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	48 fps +12%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	38 fps -12%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	214 fps +110%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	112 fps +10%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	102 fps
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps -21%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	70 fps +106%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	39 fps +15%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	29 fps -15%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	90 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	49 fps +9%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	45 fps
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	41 fps -9%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	89 fps +75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53 fps +4%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps -16%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	241 fps +110%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps +3%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps -12%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	48 fps +129%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	24 fps +14%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19 fps -10%

Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	225.315 Points +113%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)	192.313 Points +82%
Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115)	127.177 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 178.5, n=21)	121.1 Points +15%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14)	105.645 Points
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=59, last 2 years)	84.9 Points -20%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	227 Points +129%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)	151 Points +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69 - 159, n=19)	111 Points +12%
Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115)	100 Points +1%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14)	99 Points
Average of class Tablet (21 - 227, n=57, last 2 years)	85.7 Points -13%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	74614 Points +83%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)	62837 Points +54%
Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115)	47420 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 55611, n=22)	41373 Points +1%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14)	40762 Points
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years)	23028 Points -44%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=59, last 2 years)	3209 ms * -186%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14)	1121.3 ms *
Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115)	1103.4 ms * +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (729 - 1707, n=20)	1047 ms * +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)	634.3 ms * +43%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	450.9 ms * +60%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	Lenovo Tab Extreme	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		8%	-11%	-27%	-63%
Sequential Read 256KB	1983.47	3367.33 70%	1914.4 -3%	1759 ?(1004 - 2037, n=88) -11%	850 ?(163 - 3414, n=68, last 2 years) -57%
Sequential Write 256KB	1873.45	1891.49 1%	1585 -15%	1130 ?(452 - 1873, n=88) -40%	532 ?(78.2 - 2528, n=68, last 2 years) -72%
Random Read 4KB	374.54	449.37 20%	330.7 -12%	282 ?(173.5 - 543, n=88) -25%	167 ?(18.4 - 451, n=68, last 2 years) -55%
Random Write 4KB	446.71	174.32 -61%	380.6 -15%	309 ?(132.1 - 499, n=89) -31%	150.8 ?(8.23 - 503, n=68, last 2 years) -66%

排放 - 小米平板电脑不节流

温度

小米平板电脑的外壳在日常使用中几乎不会发热，即使在负载情况下，温度也不会急剧上升。为了检查设备内部的发热情况，我们使用了 3DMark 进行测试。Wild Life 压力测试完美运行，一致性超过 99%。有趣的是，Pad 6 Max 的性能水平与三星Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra的骁龙 8 代 2的性能水平差不多。

Max. Load

Idle


36 °C	42.9 °C	44.1 °C
34.5 °C	37.4 °C	39.3 °C
33.9 °C	34.4 °C	34.2 °C

Maximum: 44.1 °C
Average: 37.4 °C


37.2 °C	44 °C	38.8 °C
36 °C	38 °C	36.3 °C
33.9 °C	33.7 °C	34 °C

Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 36.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 38.1 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø56.1 (55.9-56.5)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø60.8 (56.7-76)

Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.7 (46.6-47.1)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø14.7 (14.7-14.8)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø19.4 (18.2-23.4)

Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø14.2 (14.2-14.3)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	99.6 (14.7^min - 14.8^max) %
Lenovo Tab Extreme	99.5 (14.2^min - 14.3^max) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	77.6 (18.2^min - 23.4^max) % -22%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14	99 (55.9^min - 56.5^max) %
Lenovo Tab Extreme	98.9 (46.6^min - 47.1^max) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	74.7 (56.7^min - 76^max) % -25%

Legend

Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

Lenovo Tab Extreme MediaTek Dimensity 9000, ARM Mali-G710 MP10, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

发言人

平板电脑的八个立体声扬声器由四个低音扬声器和高音扬声器组成，提供了非常好的声音体验。低音大部分听不到，但 Pad 6 Max 强劲的低音和均匀的中音给人留下了深刻印象。高音也得到了很好的强调。

有些用户会怀念平板电脑上没有 3.5 毫米音频输出的遗憾。相反，音频内容必须使用转接器通过 USB-C 端口输出。通过蓝牙 5.3，可无线使用多种音频编解码器：SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive 以及 LDAC 和 LHDC (V5)。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 小米 Pad 6 Max 具有快速充电功能

耗电量

Pad 6 Max 的充电功率为 67 瓦，但也可以将智能手机连接到平板电脑的 USB 端口，并以高达 33 瓦的功率为其充电。在闲置模式下，它的耗电量并不是最高效的。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.04 / 0.14 Watt
Idle	2.57 / 8.65 / 8.71 Watt
Load	14.98 / 14.99 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 10000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 11200 mAh	Lenovo Tab Extreme 12300 mAh	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 10702 mAh
Power Consumption		15%	30%	-12%
Idle Minimum *	2.57	3.17 -23%	2.6 -1%	2.54 1%
Idle Average *	8.65	3.68 57%	3 65%	11.24 -30%
Idle Maximum *	8.71	3.91 55%	3.4 61%	11.48 -32%
Load Average *	14.98	15.83 -6%	9.5 37%	12.97 13%
Load Maximum *	14.99	15.84 -6%	16.9 -13%	16.6 -11%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1: Ø7.45 (3.06-12.8)

Lenovo Tab Extreme MediaTek Dimensity 9000: Ø9.78 (6.33-16.9)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.87 (9.1-10.7)

Lenovo Tab Extreme MediaTek Dimensity 9000; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø16.2 (15.3-16.9)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.18 (4.11-4.39)

Lenovo Tab Extreme MediaTek Dimensity 9000; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.2 (3.01-3.66)

运行时间

在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，Pad 6 Max 在调整显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m² 的情况下持续了 15 个小时。使用附带的充电器，10,000 毫安时电池可在约 80 分钟内快速充满。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Mi Browser V14)		14h 58min

	Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 10000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 11200 mAh	Lenovo Tab Extreme 12300 mAh	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 10702 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	898	623 -31%	664 -26%	671 -25%

Pros

+ 运行时间长

+ 性能稳定

+ 明亮的 120-Hz IPS 面板

+ 迷人的音频系统

+ 快速 USB 3.2

+ 高品质外观

Cons

- 高黑值

- 进口设备限制

- 无定位服务

小米平板 6 Max 的评价

小米 Pad 6 Max 14 平板电脑评测。测试设备由 TradingShenzhen 提供

小米平板 6 Max 的性价比很高，尽管感兴趣的买家在购买进口设备时会遇到一些常见问题（没有本地 GMS、语言选项有限......）。与竞争对手的 XXL 平板电脑相比，小米平板电脑的优势在于运行时间长--即使是一台iPad Pro 12.9也跟不上。在质量和音频体验方面，小米 Tab 也毫不逊色。

其安装的Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1可能不是高通公司最新的高端 SoC，但它有足够的储备来提供流畅的日常使用，甚至比昂贵得多的联想 Tab Extreme在我们的基准测试中表现也不如它。此外，小米平板电脑的性能甚至与Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra在负载情况下的表现与 Tab S9 Ultra 相似，这要归功于其良好的系统散热和稳定的电力传输。

如果你有兴趣购买一款 XXL 平板电脑，但又不准备花费 1000 美元，那么小米 Pad 6 Max 可能是一个非常有趣的选择。

这家中国制造商在设备的连接性方面节省了一些成本。它既不支持 5G 也不支持 GPS。Pad 6 Max 的另一个弱点是其 IPS 面板的黑度较高。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

小米 Pad 6 Max 的售价约为 670 美元，可从Trading Shenzhen 等网站购买。.

Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 - 2023-09-27 09/27/2023 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

84 / 98 → 86%

Keyboard

71 / 80 → 89%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

58 / 70 → 83%

Weight

79 / 40-88 → 81%

Battery

91%

Display

89%

Games Performance

74 / 78 → 94%

Application Performance

94 / 92 → 100%

Temperature

88%

Noise

100%

Audio

89 / 91 → 98%

Camera

58 / 85 → 68%

Average

82%

89%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 215 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389876 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米 Pad 6 Max 14 平板电脑评测 - 价格仅为三星Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 的一半的替代品

Marcus Herbrich, 2023-09-29 (Update: 2023-09-29)