联想 Tab Extreme 平板电脑评测：大型专业平板也是专业游戏玩家

Name: Lenovo Tab Extreme
Brand: Lenovo

这东西很大。 14.5 英寸的联想 Tab Extreme 在平板电脑尺寸方面无与伦比。精确的手写笔输入、优雅的铝制外壳和高昂的价格都使它成为一款面向专业人士的设备。它能与Apple 和三星的顶级产品相抗衡吗？

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/15/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android ARM Tablet Touchscreen

与笔记本电脑屏幕一样大的平板电脑？这不再是痴人说梦。至少自从三星Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra.

联想也不甘落后，推出了联想 Tab Extreme，这是一款配备 14.5 英寸 OLED 屏幕的超大平板电脑。这款平板电脑的底价估计在 950 美元左右，它的目标用户不一定是偶尔使用的用户，而是专业人士，因为它支持手写笔和键盘盖，是一款创意工具和工作利器。

让我们仔细看看联想首次尝试为高价位领域打造这样一款大型Android 平板电脑。

Test device courtesy of Lenovo Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo Tab Extreme

Processor

MediaTek Dimensity 9000 8 x 1.8 - 3.1 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G710 MP10

Memory

12 GB

Display

14.50 inch 16:10, 3000 x 1876 pixel 244 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 235 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSDXC up to 1TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, hall

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.2 x 327.8 x 210.8

Battery

12300 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 68-watt charging

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.4) + 5MP Ultrawide (f/2.2)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 4 speakers, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, Folio, Pen, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

740 g

Price

1299 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
88.8 %	08/2023	Lenovo Tab Extreme Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10	740 g	7.2 mm	14.50"	3000x1876
88.8 %	05/2022	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	726 g	5.5 mm	14.60"	2960x1848
91.8 %	11/2022	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2, M2 10-Core GPU	682 g	6.4 mm	12.90"	2732x2048
86.2 %	09/2021	Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 SD 870, Adreno 650	830 g	6.2 mm	13.00"	2160x1350
89.1 %	04/2022	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro SD 870, Adreno 650	565 g	5.6 mm	12.60"	2560x1600

表壳 - 回收材料和大猩猩玻璃 5

外壳由 100% 再生铝制成，联想平板电脑采用无塑料包装，印刷量极少。

背面有一个凸起的模块，横跨整个上边缘宽度，用玻璃覆盖。一方面是摄像头和 LED 闪光灯，另一方面是磁性存储和联想Precision Pen 3 的充电选项。

如此大的平板电脑，厚度只有 5 毫米多一点（不包括摄像头模块），在稳定性方面总是存在一定的风险。联想 Tab Extreme 拥有高质量的构造，但在四角会受到扭转应力的影响，在中心受压时会有一些弯曲。它在日常使用中应该足够稳定，但用户应注意不要让它承受物理压力。

材料过渡平滑，正面有大猩猩 5 号玻璃保护。Tab Extreme 比三星的竞争对手稍重一些。这款大平板电脑重达 740 克，长时间握持会让手臂很快感到疲劳。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Tab Extreme Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 DIN A4 ❌

设备 - 同时提供两个 USB 端口

联想 Tab Extreme 配备 12GB 内存和 256GB 大容量存储空间，售价 950 美元。此外，还可根据要求提供 5G 版本，但这只是企业客户的可选配置。

联想平板电脑提供两个 USB-C 端口，即一个 USB 3.0 端口和一个 USB 2.0 端口。非常方便，因为您可以在连接配件的同时为 Tab Extreme 充电，将其用作辅助显示器，或通过 USB 3.0 端口在外部显示器上播放。

背面的 Pogo PIN 可用于连接键盘盖或扩展坞。Precision Pen 3 的磁性充电和存储端口可在 30 分钟内为笔充满电。

microSD 读卡器

Tab Extreme 还配备了 microSD 读卡器，可以快速传输数据并扩展存储空间。在使用我们的 Angelbird V60 microSD 参考卡进行的测试中，读卡器的速度被证明相当快，但比三星 S8 Ultra 的模块慢一些。三星Galaxy S8 Ultra 的模块要慢一些。.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	53 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)	48.6 MB/s
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)	31.4 MB/s -35%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø40.8 (27.3-49)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø39.7 (31.7-50.1)

Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø70.6 (31.3-81)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78.8 (59.1-89.7)

软件 -Android 13，长期更新

联想在平板电脑上预装了Android 13，并叠加了其内部 ZUI 15 版本。这导致设置和设计略有改动，但总的来说，你会得到一个与原版非常相似的Android 。

安全补丁是从 2023 年 6 月开始的，因此在评测时仍然是合理的最新版本，但你不应该指望每月都能更新。制造商承诺提供 3 次新的Android 操作系统升级，因此可升级到Android 16 和至少 4 年的安全更新。

第三方广告软件不是问题，因为 S Pen 只预装了几个应用程序。联想还提供了 Widevine-L1 认证，因此可以在大屏幕上欣赏到全质量的流媒体内容。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 机载 WiFi 6E

我们的测试设备是联想 Tab Extreme 的 WiFi 版，它配备了 WiFi 6E，这意味着它可以连接到较少使用的 6 GHz 频段。

我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器进行的测试表明，在 5 GHz 频段也能很好地使用千兆互联网连接，但会出现明显的掉线现象。通过 6 GHz 频段可以获得更高的数据传输速率，但速度也会出现波动。

我们在路由器旁边测试了平板电脑的信号强度，这里的接收能力最强，网站加载速度也很快。在 10 米的距离内，隔着 3 面墙，信号就会变弱很多，只剩下一半甚至四分之一的信号条。尽管如此，复杂网站的加载速度还是非常快，包括图片。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	864 (771^min - 896^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	795 (717^min - 849^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	832 (779^min - 876^max) MBit/s +3%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	806 (614^min - 856^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	719 (644^min - 771^max) MBit/s -11%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	442 (222^min - 528^max) MBit/s -45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	956 (876^min - 983^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	909 (871^min - 942^max) MBit/s -5%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	851 (475^min - 925^max) MBit/s -11%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	486 (175^min - 591^max) MBit/s -49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1785 (1685^min - 1866^max) MBit/s +9%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1635 (1256^min - 1717^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	747 (145^min - 917^max) MBit/s -54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1632 (1604^min - 1667^max) MBit/s +44%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1132 (682^min - 1286^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	702 (225^min - 834^max) MBit/s -38%

Lenovo Tab Extreme; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1635 (1256-1717)

Lenovo Tab Extreme; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1132 (682-1286)

Lenovo Tab Extreme; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø805 (614-856)

Lenovo Tab Extreme; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø956 (876-983)

联想平板电脑的 Wi-Fi 版还安装了跟踪模块。在室外使用几秒钟后，Tab Extreme 就能以 2 米的精度确定我们的位置。所有主要的卫星网络都得到了利用，包括精度更高的 SBAS。

当然，我们还进行了实际测试，以确定平板电脑在现实世界中的跟踪能力。因此，我们骑上自行车，带上定位精度很高的 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表作为对比设备。联想 Tab Extreme 显示，路线追踪并不是它的强项：在相当开阔的地形上，给定的位置往往与实际路线有很大偏差，环路几乎没有地图。

在老城区狭窄的街道上，平板电脑会将我们置于建筑物中或街道的错误一侧。总之，联想 Tab Extreme 只能满足那些想知道大概位置的人的需求，但精确导航是不可能的。

摄像头 - 配备广角摄像头的联想平板电脑

由于其尺寸和重量，用户很少会使用联想 Tab Extreme 外出拍照。尽管如此，联想 Tab Extreme 背面还是提供了一个额外的广角摄像头。这颗 500 万像素的镜头可能会被用来拍摄快照，但不宜放大，因为细节会明显变得非常粗糙。

1300 万像素的主摄像头主要存在动态方面的问题，即再现非常明亮或非常暗的区域，照片的清晰度也相当一般。该摄像头当然可以毫不犹豫地用于抓拍，但你不应该期望它能拍出高质量智能手机光学镜头水平的照片。视频可录制成 4K，由于亮度调节迅速、自动对焦精确，因此图像质量相当不错。

前置摄像头的分辨率也达到了 1300 万像素，在光线良好的情况下也能拍出不错的自拍照。不过，在放大照片时，清晰度和轮廓方面的细节缺陷就会显现出来。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera - flower Main camera - surrounding environment Main camera - low light Wide angle

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

主摄像头还需要在实验室中证明自己，在光线充足的情况下，它的清晰度会出现明显的问题。但对比度仍然相当不错。在只有 1 勒克斯的光照条件下，仍能辨认出内容，但图像细节非常模糊。

ColorChecker Lenovo Tab Extreme: 7.96 ∆E min: 2.04 - max: 13.03 ∆E

配件和保修 - 钢笔和对开本不含税

联想提供了一套不错的配件。不仅有相应的充电器、高质量的 USB 数据线和 SIM 卡工具，还有一个双面盖，上面有一个笔槽，还可以用作支架。此外，联想还提供了Precision Pen 3，可用于在平板电脑上绘图。

如果你想把 Tab Extreme 用作笔记本电脑的替代品，你还会得到一个带 2 个铰链的键盘保护套，可以轻松调整屏幕的角度。

输入设备和操作 -Precision Pen 3，用于精确操作

大尺寸触摸屏的操作非常精确；表面光滑，显示屏能可靠地接受边边角角的指令。得益于 120 Hz 的屏幕，操作感觉非常灵敏。

指纹传感器位于机身右侧的待机键上，可用于生物识别解锁平板电脑。它读取手指的速度相当快，但 Tab Extreme 要过一会儿才能真正解锁。面部识别也是可行的，但由于使用的是二维图像，很容易被人为操纵。

联想随附的Precision Pen 3 可以通过磁铁吸附在平板电脑上，在横屏模式下可以吸附在背面或底部边缘。不过，它只能在背面充电。

这支笔有 4,096 级压力，电池容量为 30 毫安时，重 16 克。它非常适合握在手中，易于涂抹和绘画。如果需要，笔上的集成按钮可以用作遥控器，这意味着它可以用来停止和启动视频或音乐，或在演示文稿中向前滚动。

显示屏 - PWM

联想 Tab Extreme 配备了 OLED 屏幕，分辨率高达 3,000 x 1,876。

有限的亮度表明这款平板电脑更适合在室内而非室外使用。联想规定的最高亮度为 500 cd/m²，而我们在高亮度模式下测得的亮度为 479 cd/m²，该模式必须单独激活。其他大型平板电脑的亮度更高一些，但在明亮天气的室外使用时也相当不理想。

我们观察到，在低亮度下，PWM 闪烁频率在 130 到 280 Hz 之间。遗憾的是，Extreme Tab 无法通过直流调光来缓解这一问题。


445 cd/m²	469 cd/m²	430 cd/m²
443 cd/m²	479 cd/m²	451 cd/m²
453 cd/m²	468 cd/m²	462 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 479 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 455.6 cd/m² Minimum: 4.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 479 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.28

	Lenovo Tab Extreme OLED, 3000x1876, 14.50	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Super AMOLED, 2960x1848, 14.60	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Mini-LED, 2732x2048, 12.90	Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 IPS, 2160x1350, 13.00	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro AMOLED, 2560x1600, 12.60
Screen		17%	24%	-33%	4%
Brightness middle	479	600 25%	611 28%	404 -16%	552 15%
Brightness	456	604 32%	605 33%	374 -18%	555 22%
Brightness Distribution	90	96 7%	92 2%	85 -6%	97 8%
Black Level *				0.4
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.2	2.7 16%	1.4 56%	2.94 8%	3.43 -7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.82	5.3 22%	3.3 52%	8.74 -28%	7.25 -6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.8	1.8 -0%	2.3 -28%	4.3 -139%	2 -11%
Gamma	2.28 ^96%	2.09 ^105%	2.22 ^99%	2.14 ^103%	2.253 ^98%
CCT	6794 ^96%	6461 ^101%	6930 ^94%	7084 ^92%	6417 ^101%
Contrast				1010

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

280 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 280 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 280 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置下进行的系列测量

如果选择 "自然 "色彩配置文件，色彩显示非常准确，只有强烈的绿色和红色稍有偏差。总的来说，该显示屏适合专业用途，尤其是白平衡可以手动优化。

如果需要，平板电脑还可以根据环境光线自动调整色彩。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.8 ms rise
1.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.2 ms rise
2.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

如前所述，Tab Extreme 并不适合在户外使用，因为它的屏幕反光较强，无法提供必要的亮度，在明亮的日子里也无法很好地显示内容。另一方面，那些躲在阴凉处的人也能很好地使用这款平板电脑。

由于采用了 OLED 技术，该平板电脑的可视角度非常宽，因此您可以从侧面观看显示屏。

性能 - 日常工作动力充沛

使用联发科 Dimensity 9000作为 SoC，联想 Tab Extreme 在我们的性能测试中与重量级产品竞争，例如 Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022及其 Apple M2或三星Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra及其骁龙 8 代 1。很快我们就会发现，联想平板电脑无法与 iPad Pro 相提并论，但却能很好地跟上三星设备的步伐。

总的来说，我们对比设备的性能水平都很高，因此联想 Tab Extreme 的系统非常流畅。几乎不存在卡顿现象，非常复杂的应用程序也能流畅运行。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	1890 Points +55%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (1211 - 1279, n=5)	1246 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	1242 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	1217 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	967 Points -21%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	955 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=68, last 2 years)	664 Points -45%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	8524 Points +128%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (3736 - 4324, n=5)	4056 Points +9%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	3736 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	3393 Points -9%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	3215 Points -14%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	3131 Points -16%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=68, last 2 years)	2362 Points -37%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	1416727 Points +41%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	1005158 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (935522 - 1017490, n=5)	987309 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	889268 Points -12%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	707685 Points -30%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	676505 Points -33%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=52, last 2 years)	453858 Points -55%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (13407 - 17573, n=4)	15462 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	13996 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	13565 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	13407 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	10829 Points -19%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=65, last 2 years)	8736 Points -35%

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	1584 Points +67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	1090 Points +15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (948 - 1114, n=3)	1038 Points +9%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	948 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	732 Points -23%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1585, n=51, last 2 years)	672 Points -29%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (7255 - 7714, n=3)	7474 Points +3%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	7255 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	6816 Points -6%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	6164 Points -15%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	5865 Points -19%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=52, last 2 years)	3631 Points -50%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	Points -100%
System
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (9398 - 11650, n=3)	10561 Points +12%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	10489 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	10112 Points +8%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	9398 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	9124 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=52, last 2 years)	6543 Points -30%
Memory
Lenovo Tab Extreme	7900 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (6873 - 7900, n=3)	7458 Points -6%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	7365 Points -7%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	7215 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	6763 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 8890, n=52, last 2 years)	4284 Points -46%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	22308 Points +14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (19574 - 22155, n=3)	20741 Points +6%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	19574 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	12350 Points -37%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	11754 Points -40%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=52, last 2 years)	6639 Points -66%
Web
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (1906 - 1951, n=3)	1921 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	1907 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	1544 Points -19%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	1452 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	1415 Points -26%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=52, last 2 years)	1205 Points -37%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	73266 Points +141%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	30392 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (29236 - 30392, n=3)	29836 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=49, last 2 years)	8899 Points -71%

Legend

Lenovo Tab Extreme MediaTek Dimensity 9000, ARM Mali-G710 MP10, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe

Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000

Average of class Tablet

联想 Tab Extreme 能够以 19 帧/秒的速度显示 4K 游戏，这说明其图形处理能力很强，但是 Apple iPad Pro 12.9的帧速率却是它的两倍多。

这款平板电脑在生成 1440p 或 FullHD 的流畅显示效果方面没有任何问题，因此也可用于实时处理要求苛刻的图形。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	6909 Points +193%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2361 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2325 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1225 Points -48%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1195 Points -49%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	6919 Points +195%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2345 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2337 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1232 Points -47%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1203 Points -49%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	25317 Points +194%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9519 Points +10%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8621 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4199 Points -51%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	4154 Points -52%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8833 Points +13%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7834 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4211 Points -46%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	4204 Points -46%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	Points -100%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	120 fps +1%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	873 fps +197%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	294 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	288 fps -2%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	226 fps -23%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	224 fps -24%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	120 fps +15%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	104 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 fps -24%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps -25%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	60 fps -42%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	494 fps +128%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	217 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	171 fps -21%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	132 fps -39%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	131 fps -40%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	115 fps +83%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	59 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps -21%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -22%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	340 fps +128%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	149 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps -23%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	95 fps -36%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	92 fps -38%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	89 fps +134%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	42 fps +11%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	38 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps -26%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	214 fps +164%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps -16%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps -28%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	57 fps -30%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	70 fps +141%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	29 fps
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	27 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps -7%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps -31%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	90 fps +120%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	41 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps -15%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	22 fps -46%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps -46%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	89 fps +107%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	43 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps -9%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps -26%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	241 fps +139%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 fps -12%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	59 fps -42%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps -44%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	48 fps +153%
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19 fps

在浏览器基准测试中，我们的测试设备在对比设备中处于中上水平。在日常使用中，详细而广泛的网站加载速度很快，通常在滚动时就能看到图片。

因此，如果你喜欢浏览网页，Tab Extreme 将是一款速度非常快的平板电脑，但该设备的速度还无法与 iPad Pro 相提并论。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	225.315 Points +77%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (127.2 - 148.6, n=3)	141.3 Points +11%
Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115)	127.177 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)	126.3 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	108.3 Points -15%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chrome 92)	94 Points -26%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=59, last 2 years)	84.9 Points -33%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	227 Points +127%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (100 - 158, n=3)	137 Points +37%
Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115)	100 Points
Average of class Tablet (21 - 227, n=57, last 2 years)	85.7 Points -14%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	342 Points +183%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)	173 Points +43%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	155 Points +28%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chrome 92)	134 Points +11%
Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115)	121 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 ()	121 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=42, last 2 years)	120.7 Points 0%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	376 runs/min +242%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (110 - 151, n=3)	126.7 runs/min +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)	119 runs/min +8%
Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115)	110 runs/min
Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=52, last 2 years)	77.2 runs/min -30%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chome 92)	74.2 runs/min -33%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	65.5 runs/min -40%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	74614 Points +57%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (47420 - 50714, n=3)	49521 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)	48281 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115)	47420 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	41256 Points -13%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chrome 92)	33694 Points -29%
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years)	23028 Points -51%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=59, last 2 years)	3209 ms * -191%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 (Chrome 92)	1158 ms * -5%
Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115)	1103.4 ms *
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	1055 ms * +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (798 - 1103, n=3)	916 ms * +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)	839 ms * +24%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	450.9 ms * +59%

* ... smaller is better

联想平板电脑采用了 UFS 3.1 存储系统，速度非常快，而且其存储控制器性能卓越，可以很好地利用可能的速度。应用程序加载速度很快，数据传输也非常迅速。

	Lenovo Tab Extreme	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-33%	-37%	-35%	-18%	-58%
Sequential Read 256KB	1914.4	1817 -5%	1431 -25%	1782 -7%	1759 ?(1004 - 2037, n=88) -8%	850 ?(163 - 3414, n=68, last 2 years) -56%
Sequential Write 256KB	1585	451.6 -72%	711 -55%	758 -52%	1130 ?(452 - 1873, n=88) -29%	532 ?(78.2 - 2528, n=68, last 2 years) -66%
Random Read 4KB	330.7	238 -28%	249.1 -25%	232.5 -30%	282 ?(173.5 - 543, n=88) -15%	167 ?(18.4 - 451, n=68, last 2 years) -50%
Random Write 4KB	380.6	284.9 -25%	215.2 -43%	189.2 -50%	309 ?(132.1 - 499, n=89) -19%	150.8 ?(8.23 - 503, n=68, last 2 years) -60%

游戏 - 出乎意料的玩家友好

通过测试各种游戏，我们惊喜地发现：联想 Tab Extreme 是一款出色的游戏平板电脑。

为什么呢？因为很多游戏都能轻松达到 60 帧/秒，而且屏幕的高帧率也能被充分利用。例如，《PUBG Mobile》在低设置下可以稳定运行在 90 帧/秒，而快速 2D 射击游戏《Armajet》则可以达到 120 帧/秒。

此外，Tab Extreme 的操控也非常精确，因此有能力购买的高要求玩家应该关注 Tab Extreme。

Lenovo Tab Extreme; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø119.6 (118-120)

Lenovo Tab Extreme; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.7.0: Ø89.5 (86-90)

Lenovo Tab Extreme; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.7.0: Ø59.7 (56-61)

Lenovo Tab Extreme; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.7.0: Ø39.8 (37-42)

Lenovo Tab Extreme; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low; 2.0.2: Ø58.4 (54-60)

Lenovo Tab Extreme; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High; 2.0.2: Ø58 (37-60)

排放 - 联想 Tab Extreme 拥有良好的音响系统

温度

在长时间负载的情况下，联想 Tab 上会出现局部高温，最高可达 40.5 °C。这很明显，但并不严重。平板电脑的大表面提供了足够的散热空间。

SoC 在机箱中似乎也感觉舒适，在多次重复基准测试后也不会降低性能。

Max. Load

Idle


29.8 °C	40.5 °C	34.1 °C
29 °C	31.5 °C	31.7 °C
32.4 °C	30 °C	29 °C

Maximum: 40.5 °C
Average: 32 °C


30.1 °C	39.4 °C	30.8 °C
28.9 °C	32.8 °C	30 °C
28.8 °C	30.1 °C	29.5 °C

Maximum: 39.4 °C
Average: 31.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.7 (46.6-47.1)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø40.4 (34.9-53.1)

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø97.9 (82.8-119)

Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.1 (25.1-25.2)

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.2 (25.1-25.3)

Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø14.2 (14.2-14.3)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.9 (9.55-14.1)

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø29.8 (27.1-41.5)

Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø7.29 (7.29-7.31)

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø7.3 (7.29-7.33)

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø124.5 (113.6-152.4)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	99.7 (7.29^min - 7.31^max) % 0%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	99.5 (7.29^min - 7.33^max) % 0%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	99.5 (14.2^min - 14.3^max) %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	67.9 (9.55^min - 14.1^max) % -32%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	65.1 (27.1^min - 41.5^max) % -35%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Yoga Tab 13	99.5 (25.1^min - 25.2^max) % +1%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	99.4 (25.1^min - 25.3^max) % +1%
Lenovo Tab Extreme	98.9 (46.6^min - 47.1^max) %
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	69.6 (82.8^min - 119^max) % -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	65.8 (34.9^min - 53.1^max) % -33%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	74.6 (113.6^min - 152.4^max) %

Legend

Lenovo Tab Extreme MediaTek Dimensity 9000, ARM Mali-G710 MP10, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe

Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

发言人

对于这种大型平板电脑来说，4 个扬声器是很常见的，但仅凭数量并不能保证音质。如果你喜欢大音量的音乐，那么联想 Tab Extreme 的最大音量只能达到 81.2 dB(A)，但在其他方面的音效还是不错的。均衡的中高音和偶尔非常清晰的低音确保了音乐的享受。

喜欢连接耳机或扬声器的用户可以直接使用 USB-C 端口或蓝牙 5.3。这里的声音输出非常干净。不过，蓝牙编解码器的选择范围还可以再大一些；只支持 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD 和 LDAC 等最重要的标准。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo Tab Extreme audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 为日常生活提供充足的电池电量

耗电量

大型平板电脑需要消耗大量能源，联想 Tab Extreme 也是如此。在开机和执行轻量级任务时，该设备从电池或电源中提取的能量至少为 2.6 瓦。在满负荷状态下，该平板电脑的耗电量高达 16.9 瓦，明显高于三星的 Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra.

如果电池电量耗尽，可以使用小巧的充电器以高达 65 瓦的功率充电。完全充满一块空电池大约需要 90 分钟。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.2 / 0.3 Watt
Idle	2.6 / 3 / 3.4 Watt
Load	9.5 / 16.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Lenovo Tab Extreme 12300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra 11200 mAh	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 10702 mAh	Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 10000 mAh	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro 10200 mAh
Power Consumption		-2%	-109%	-7%	18%
Idle Minimum *	2.6	3.18 -22%	2.54 2%	3 -15%	2.2 15%
Idle Average *	3	3.84 -28%	11.24 -275%	3.4 -13%	2.6 13%
Idle Maximum *	3.4	3.88 -14%	11.48 -238%	4.1 -21%	3.2 6%
Load Average *	9.5	8.04 15%	12.97 -37%	9.9 -4%	7.1 25%
Load Maximum *	16.9	10.44 38%	16.6 2%	13.8 18%	11.5 32%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Tab Extreme: Ø9.78 (6.33-16.9)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Tab Extreme; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø16.2 (15.3-16.9)

Lenovo Tab Extreme; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.2 (3.01-3.66)

电池寿命

与其他平板电脑相比，联想 Tab Extreme 的电池容量为 12,300 毫安时，非常强劲。

事实上，你也会注意到，由于屏幕较大，如此大容量的电池是必要的，因为在 WLAN 上网时不可能超过 11 小时。另一方面，在高负载情况下可以工作长达 5 小时，这也说明了这款大型平板电脑的能源管理能力。

如果你喜欢看电影，只要提前下载，一次充电就能看完魔戒三部曲的所有扩展版。即使总时长仅为 11 个多小时，也会有点吃力。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		17h 39min
WiFi Websurfing		11h 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 25min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 06min

	Lenovo Tab Extreme 12300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra 11200 mAh	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 10702 mAh	Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 10000 mAh	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro 10200 mAh
Battery Runtime		-5%	11%	65%	-3%
Reader / Idle	1059	949 -10%	1839 74%	2536 139%	1034 -2%
H.264	745	651 -13%	816 10%	1199 61%	892 20%
WiFi v1.3	664	521 -22%	671 1%	1056 59%	627 -6%
Load	306	387 26%	173 -43%	306 0%	236 -23%

Pros

+ 包括笔和对开本

+ 色彩表现力强

+ 两个 USB 端口

+ 应要求提供 5G（商业客户）

+ 强大的游戏功能

+ 快速存储

+ 良好的音响系统

+ 加载时间快

Cons

- 跟踪不准确

- PWM 闪烁

- 屏幕亮度一般

评价 - 专业领域的精良装备

联想的 Tab Extreme 很好地进入了专业平板电脑的行列。它的一大亮点是，你可以获得包括对开盖和笔在内的丰富配件包，这使得它的总体投资比 Apple iPad Pro 12.9.

巨大的屏幕具有高分辨率和良好的色彩还原能力，但无法缓解低亮度时的 PWM 闪烁。两个 USB 端口增加了灵活性，企业客户还可以根据要求为平板电脑配置 5G 支持。

联想用回收铝制造背面，这是向更可持续的设备迈出的一小步，更新承诺也有助于尽可能延长设备的使用时间。

到目前为止，一切都很好。不过，低分辨率广角摄像头和平板电脑的追踪功能更像是噱头，功能不佳而非良好。

联想 Tab Extreme 的 WLAN 上网速度很快，操作也很精确，而且令人惊喜的是，它还是一个游戏专家：在某些游戏中可以达到很高的帧率，而在其他游戏中至少可以稳定地保持 60 帧。

联想 Tab Extreme 是一款拥有超大屏幕的高品质平板电脑，由于支持手写笔和键盘盖，因此非常适合专业人士使用。家庭用户也应该看看，因为这款平板电脑也是一款出色的娱乐产品。

iPad iPad Pro 12.9更小巧一些，其棱角分明的外形提供了一个特殊的功能。它的速度更快，但相应的配件和内存/存储升级也非常昂贵。三星三星Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra更便宜，因为它是最近发布的继任者。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

目前，联想 Tab Extreme 的供货情况似乎有限，具体取决于所在地。在联想的美国网站上，浏览者可以看到这款平板电脑的产品页面，上面标注着 "即将上市"。

Lenovo Tab Extreme - 2023-08-13 08/13/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

88 / 98 → 90%

Keyboard

71 / 80 → 89%

Pointing Device

97%

Connectivity

57 / 70 → 82%

Weight

79 / 40-88 → 82%

Battery

89%

Display

88%

Games Performance

65 / 78 → 83%

Application Performance

88 / 92 → 96%

Temperature

93%

Noise

100%

Audio

83 / 91 → 91%

Camera

60 / 85 → 70%

Average

81%

89%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 922 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389876 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想 Tab Extreme 平板电脑评测：大型专业平板也是专业游戏玩家

Florian Schmitt, 2023-08-15 (Update: 2023-08-15)