Notebookcheck

打了鸡血的ZenBook:华硕ZenBook Pro Duo UX581笔记本电脑评测

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by Zewei Shen), 12/04/2019
Touchscreen Laptop / Notebook Geforce

一台电脑,两块屏幕。 华硕最新的ScreenPad Plus使Apple Touch Bar看起来就像个玩具。 可超频的Core i9 CPU,GeForce RTX显卡,1 TB三星SSD和32 GB板载RAM是豪华的配置,而价格也同样昂贵。

Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV (ZenBook Pro Duo UX581 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-9980HK
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Core: 960 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, 436.30, Optimus
Memory
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2666
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, Capacitive, Samsung SDCA029, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR
Mainboard
Intel HM370
Storage
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB 
,
Soundcard
Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米二合一, Sensors: IR
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 24 x 359 x 246
Battery
71 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4-cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: IR
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 腕托,有源WACOM笔, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.5 kg, Power Supply: 768 g
Price
3000美元(参考) USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

360 mm 275 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg365 mm 251 mm 18.9 mm 1.9 kg359 mm 246 mm 24 mm 2.5 kg362.2 mm 261.6 mm 19.8 mm 2.4 kg357 mm 235 mm 17 mm 2 kg354 mm 220 mm 18 mm 1.6 kg
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, 3.5 mm combo audio, USB 3.1 Type-A Gen. 2
Right: USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, 3.5 mm combo audio, USB 3.1 Type-A Gen. 2
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.1 Type-A Gen. 2
Left: AC adapter, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.1 Type-A Gen. 2
365.5
cd/m²
355.3
cd/m²
357.7
cd/m²
367.7
cd/m²
359.7
cd/m²
361.3
cd/m²
379.7
cd/m²
373.2
cd/m²
376.1
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Samsung SDCA029
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 379.7 cd/m² Average: 366.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.33 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 359.7 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.14 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
81.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 61.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 15.6, 3840x2160
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
BOE07D8, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Samsung 156WR04, SDCA029, OLED, 15.6, 3840x2160
Response Times
-1339%
-1634%
2962%
-453%
-24%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2.2 (1, 1.2)
44 (22, 22)
-1900%
45 (21, 24)
-1945%
17.2 (9.2, 8)
-682%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
-591%
2.3 (1.1, 1.2)
-5%
Response Time Black / White *
2.6 (1, 1.6)
22.8 (12, 10.8)
-777%
37 (23, 14)
-1323%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
-331%
10.8 (6, 4.8)
-315%
2.4 (1.1, 1.3)
8%
PWM Frequency
240.4 (52)
24040 (29)
9900%
59.52 (100)
-75%
Screen
9%
-18%
11%
-15%
1%
Brightness middle
359.7
357.6
-1%
311
-14%
266
-26%
324.8
-10%
421.2
17%
Brightness
366
350
-4%
303
-17%
252
-31%
316
-14%
417
14%
Brightness Distribution
94
85
-10%
81
-14%
88
-6%
84
-11%
94
0%
Black Level *
0.35
0.24
0.27
0.26
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.14
4.12
20%
5.1
1%
1.81
65%
4.96
4%
6.06
-18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.77
9.91
-28%
8.91
-15%
3.23
58%
8.95
-15%
11.89
-53%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.7
1.8
33%
4.93
-83%
2.44
10%
5
-85%
2.8
-4%
Gamma
2 110%
2.17 101%
2.44 90%
2.42 91%
2.21 100%
2.15 102%
CCT
6220 105%
6613 98%
7641 85%
7005 93%
7742 84%
6235 104%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61.8
87.5
42%
58
-6%
62
0%
59.8
-3%
81
31%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
81.3
100
23%
88
8%
97
19%
91.8
13%
99.6
23%
Contrast
1022
1296
985
1249
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.23
2.48
1.03
3.23
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-665% / -260%
-826% / -341%
1487% / 816%
-234% / -103%
-12% / -6%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz ≤ 52 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 52 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 13539 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

 
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610162016301640165016601670168016901700171017201730174017501760177017801790180018101820Tooltip
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1573 (1526.78-1689.97)
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1619 (1602.44-1728.31)
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1490 (1469.51-1815.95)
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1314 (1090.6-1600.38)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Core i9-8950HK
206 Points ∼94% +8%
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K
203 Points ∼93% +7%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
202 Points ∼93% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
  (181 - 213, n=10)
197 Points ∼90% +4%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Intel Core i9-9980HK
190 Points ∼87%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
185 Points ∼85% -3%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel Core i9-9880H
183 Points ∼84% -4%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
Intel Core i7-9750H
179 Points ∼82% -6%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
171 Points ∼78% -10%
Asus FX504GD
Intel Core i5-8300H
170 Points ∼78% -11%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
167 Points ∼77% -12%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points ∼72% -18%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
144 Points ∼66% -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K
1987 Points ∼45% +21%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1821 Points ∼42% +11%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1641 Points ∼38%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
  (1305 - 1930, n=11)
1631 Points ∼37% -1%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel Core i9-9880H
1401 Points ∼32% -15%
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1312 Points ∼30% -20%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1212 Points ∼28% -26%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
Intel Core i7-9750H
1166 Points ∼27% -29%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
932 Points ∼21% -43%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
850 Points ∼19% -48%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
805 Points ∼18% -51%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points ∼17% -55%
Asus FX504GD
Intel Core i5-8300H
604 Points ∼14% -63%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
131.14 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1641 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
190 Points
Help
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
7976 Points ∼62% +16%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
7311 Points ∼56% +6%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6880 Points ∼53%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
6110 Points ∼47% -11%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
5802 Points ∼45% -16%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4204 Points ∼32% -39%
Productivity
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
8025 Points ∼77% +7%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
8020 Points ∼77% +7%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
7510 Points ∼72% 0%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
7494 Points ∼72% 0%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7485 Points ∼72%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
6879 Points ∼66% -8%
Essentials
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
9741 Points ∼85% +2%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
9701 Points ∼85% +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9524 Points ∼83%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
9146 Points ∼80% -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
8971 Points ∼78% -6%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
8233 Points ∼72% -14%
Score
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
5991 Points ∼74% +6%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5826 Points ∼72% +3%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5654 Points ∼70%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
5469 Points ∼67% -3%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
5358 Points ∼66% -5%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4443 Points ∼55% -21%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
5931 Points ∼90% +12%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5919 Points ∼90% +12%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5381 Points ∼82% +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5279 Points ∼80%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
4762 Points ∼72% -10%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
4456 Points ∼68% -16%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
5039 Points ∼83% +21%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
4578 Points ∼75% +10%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4157 Points ∼68%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4052 Points ∼67% -3%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
3799 Points ∼62% -9%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
3661 Points ∼60% -12%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4157 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5279 points
Help
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
AS SSD
-0%
-23%
7%
-37%
16%
Copy Game MB/s
1676.98
728.25
-57%
1823.85
9%
1853.64
11%
Copy Program MB/s
874.26
430.94
-51%
983.98
13%
896.18
3%
Copy ISO MB/s
2111.62
1045.16
-51%
3182.39
51%
2249.66
7%
Score Total
3970
4065
2%
2845
-28%
3638
-8%
2033
-49%
4743
19%
Score Write
2034
1547
-24%
1220
-40%
1693
-17%
867
-57%
1951
-4%
Score Read
1278
1679
31%
1075
-16%
1294
1%
768
-40%
1840
44%
Access Time Write *
0.118
0.036
69%
0.027
77%
0.039
67%
0.043
64%
0.102
14%
Access Time Read *
0.041
0.04
2%
0.08
-95%
0.05
-22%
0.128
-212%
0.046
-12%
4K-64 Write
1809.77
1272.75
-30%
1047.43
-42%
1456.13
-20%
602.9
-67%
1592.91
-12%
4K-64 Read
1092.42
1431.02
31%
974.82
-11%
1077.98
-1%
583.37
-47%
1604.27
47%
4K Write
93.04
100.89
8%
131.57
41%
98.3
6%
105.06
13%
108.74
17%
4K Read
44.99
37.78
-16%
41.81
-7%
43.25
-4%
26.79
-40%
25.01
-44%
Seq Write
1316.23
1728.67
31%
411.81
-69%
1386.27
5%
1590.95
21%
2493.16
89%
Seq Read
1408.99
2098.63
49%
578.98
-59%
1723.09
22%
1574.03
12%
2105.41
49%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3158 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2397 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 358.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 408.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1618 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1898 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.12 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 104 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Corsair One i160
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), 9900K
14249 Points ∼97% +148%
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
10364 Points ∼71% +81%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9980HK
7754 Points ∼53% +35%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
7732 Points ∼53% +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (5660 - 6910, n=16)
6082 Points ∼41% +6%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9980HK
5738 Points ∼39%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H
5699 Points ∼39% -1%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
5651 Points ∼38% -2%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
5636 Points ∼38% -2%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
3626 Points ∼25% -37%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9750H
3470 Points ∼24% -40%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK
2075 Points ∼14% -64%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Corsair One i160
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), 9900K
34697 Points ∼85% +135%
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
26223 Points ∼65% +78%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9980HK
20434 Points ∼50% +38%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
19338 Points ∼48% +31%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
18346 Points ∼45% +24%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
18219 Points ∼45% +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (14768 - 18055, n=18)
15948 Points ∼39% +8%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H
15343 Points ∼38% +4%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9980HK
14768 Points ∼36%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
11332 Points ∼28% -23%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9750H
9350 Points ∼23% -37%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK
7291 Points ∼18% -51%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Corsair One i160
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), 9900K
182888 Points ∼95% +112%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
114542 Points ∼59% +33%
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
107368 Points ∼56% +25%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
107083 Points ∼55% +24%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H
103040 Points ∼53% +19%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
101587 Points ∼53% +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (55324 - 116593, n=18)
98806 Points ∼51% +15%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9980HK
86229 Points ∼45%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
80615 Points ∼42% -7%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9980HK
70414 Points ∼36% -18%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9750H
59375 Points ∼31% -31%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK
43721 Points ∼23% -49%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Corsair One i160
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), 9900K
18164 Points ∼80% +38%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9980HK
16253 Points ∼72% +23%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
13742 Points ∼61% +4%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9980HK
13191 Points ∼58%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H
12421 Points ∼55% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (9099 - 14726, n=19)
12002 Points ∼53% -9%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9750H
11904 Points ∼53% -10%
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
11888 Points ∼53% -10%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
8985 Points ∼40% -32%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
8935 Points ∼40% -32%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK
8709 Points ∼39% -34%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
6839 Points ∼30% -48%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Corsair One i160
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), 9900K
49282 Points ∼97% +151%
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
36478 Points ∼72% +85%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9980HK
26582 Points ∼52% +35%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
26413 Points ∼52% +34%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
24349 Points ∼48% +24%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
23540 Points ∼46% +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (19513 - 23734, n=19)
20790 Points ∼41% +6%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H
20784 Points ∼41% +6%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9980HK
19666 Points ∼39%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9750H
13143 Points ∼26% -33%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
12620 Points ∼25% -36%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK
8854 Points ∼17% -55%
3DMark 11 Performance
17912 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
43412 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13696 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
6059 points
Help
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
142 fps ∼100% +100%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
106 fps ∼75% +49%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
97 fps ∼68% +37%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
90 fps ∼63% +27%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
83 fps ∼58% +17%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
73 fps ∼51% +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (54 - 83, n=12)
73 fps ∼51% +3%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
71 fps ∼50%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
45 fps ∼32% -37%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
43 fps ∼30% -39%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
34 fps ∼24% -52%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
131 (min: 110, max: 147) fps ∼100% +129%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
99.7 fps ∼76% +74%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
80.6 fps ∼62% +41%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
72.7 (min: 61, max: 82) fps ∼55% +27%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
69 fps ∼53% +21%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
67 (min: 55) fps ∼51% +17%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
61.9 fps ∼47% +8%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
60.5 fps ∼46% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (55.1 - 68.9, n=19)
59.8 fps ∼46% +5%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
59.6 fps ∼45% +4%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
57.2 fps ∼44%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
40 fps ∼31% -30%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
37.7 fps ∼29% -34%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
36 fps ∼27% -37%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
30 fps ∼23% -48%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
24.2 fps ∼18% -58%
0102030405060Tooltip
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø52.5 (49-57)
low med. high ultra4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 267 185.4 112.8 57.2 41.3 fps
Rocket League (2017) 249 241.9 180.6 96.2 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 114 87 80 71 24 fps
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
Noise
-3%
-4%
-4%
-22%
-9%
off / environment *
28.4
28
1%
30.5
-7%
28.2
1%
29
-2%
29
-2%
Idle Minimum *
29
28.6
1%
30.5
-5%
28.2
3%
30
-3%
30.5
-5%
Idle Average *
29
29.9
-3%
30.5
-5%
28.2
3%
37
-28%
31.5
-9%
Idle Maximum *
29
30.5
-5%
30.5
-5%
30.4
-5%
39
-34%
31.5
-9%
Load Average *
35.4
42.5
-20%
40.8
-15%
43.8
-24%
54
-53%
40.6
-15%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42
44.8
-7%
47.2
-12%
54
-29%
49.5
-18%
Load Maximum *
50
44.8
10%
41.8
16%
47.2
6%
54
-8%
53.4
-7%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle
29 / 29 / 29 dB(A)
Load
35.4 / 50 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 28.4 dB(A)
Max. Load
 36.2 °C36 °C35.4 °C 
 40.4 °C38.8 °C39 °C 
 32.8 °C32.8 °C30.6 °C 
Maximum: 40.4 °C
Average: 35.8 °C
46 °C47.8 °C44.4 °C
41.8 °C39.2 °C46.2 °C
36.4 °C36.6 °C39.6 °C
Maximum: 47.8 °C
Average: 42 °C
Power Supply (max.)  53 °C | Room Temperature 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.6 °C / 94.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.8 °C / -10.5 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2044.542.62540.839.93138.737.4403938.55035.637.9633737.48035.538.610035.142.312535.247.21603348.72003448.125032.854.831532.660.740031.163.150030.663.46303065.280029.565.5100029.162.4125028.760.9160028.460.4200028.561.4250028.456.6315027.953.4400027.957.3500027.657.3630027.761.1800027.667.81000027.666.71250027.567.21600027.459.5SPL40.874.4N4.135.4median 28.7median 60.7Delta2.44.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GVApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.41 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.47 / 3.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 19.3 / 24.2 / 24.5 Watt
Load midlight 122.3 / 208.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
9980HK, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
27%
61%
37%
-32%
-75%
Idle Minimum *
19.3
11.7
39%
2.7
86%
6.2
68%
29
-50%
46
-138%
Idle Average *
24.2
18.5
24%
8
67%
9.6
60%
32
-32%
59
-144%
Idle Maximum *
24.5
22.8
7%
10.6
57%
21.2
13%
37
-51%
65.5
-167%
Load Average *
122.3
97.5
20%
74
39%
104.3
15%
157
-28%
99.8
18%
Load Maximum *
208.4
111.1
47%
89
57%
135.3
35%
217
-4%
222.7
-7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
137
102.9
25%
91.7
33%
173
-26%
154.1
-12%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
13h 06min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4h 08min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 24min
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
9980HK, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 71 Wh
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 71 Wh
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 73 Wh
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 97 Wh
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 66 Wh
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 72 Wh
Battery Runtime
16%
105%
80%
-30%
-42%
Reader / Idle
786
842
7%
1587
102%
910
16%
328
-58%
221
-72%
WiFi v1.3
248
375
51%
519
109%
467
88%
177
-29%
129
-48%
Load
84
76
-10%
171
104%
199
137%
81
-4%
80
-5%

Pros

+ PPI和宽度相等的两个显示
+ 默认风扇模式通常是安静的
+ 酷睿i9-9980HK性能不错
+ 低负载时安静
+ 包含主动式触控笔
+ 刚性底座和盖子
+ 雷电3
+ Wi-Fi 6

Cons

- 没有OLED + OLED或IPS + IPS选项;两块屏幕之间的色域不同
- 亮度比其他OLED笔记本电脑更暗
- 没有指纹读取器或Kensington Lock
- 没有144/240 Hz显示选项
- 仅一个内部存储插槽
- 颗粒度更高的副屏
- 没有SD读取器或RJ-45接口
- 电池寿命短
- 厚重
- 板载RAM
- 贵的
打了鸡血的ZenBook:华硕ZenBook Pro Duo UX581笔记本电脑评测. Test unit provided by Computer Upgrade King
打了鸡血的ZenBook:华硕ZenBook Pro Duo UX581笔记本电脑评测. Test unit provided by Computer Upgrade King

我们喜欢ZenBook Pro Duo UX581的独特概念及其代表意义。与2015 Razer Blade Pro,Asus ZenBook 15 UX534或 HP Omen X 2S 15的不成比例的第二屏幕相比,UX581的第二屏幕具有与主屏幕相同的宽度和PPI,因此更符合人体工程学。为了整合这么大的副屏,华硕不得不做出一些重大牺牲。最值得一提的是,UX581比典型的旗舰级超极本或多媒体笔记本电脑更厚,更重且价格更高,这使该系统更像是台式机的替代品,而不是真正的便携式产品。

挑剔的专业人士可能讨厌的一个地方是两个屏幕之间的显示质量差异。具有超快响应时间的亮面OLED本质上与响应时间较慢的雾面IPS看起来截然不同。我们怀疑3840 x 1110分辨率OLED面板的供应有限,因此华硕别无选择,只能将IPS用于ScreenPad Plus。

其他缺点包括续航时间较短,只有单个存储插槽,缺少SD读取器和内容创造者或专业人士更喜欢的NumPad触感。理想情况下,将来的ZenBook Pro Duo更新版本将能够将第二个屏幕集成到大小和重量都完美的类似Razer Blade 15, XPS 15或 Spectre x360 15 Ultrabook的机身上,而不是做成中型游戏笔记本电脑的大小。在此之前,您将无法在UX581之外找到更好的双屏体验。

华硕ZenBook Pro Duo UX581是迄今为止最成熟的双屏笔记本电脑。它消除了原始ScreenPad的某些缺陷,从而提供了更自然的桌面体验。尽管如此,双屏笔记本电脑仍处于起步阶段,ZenBook Pro Duo系列肯定会在未来从更轻薄的设计中受益。

Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV - 09/26/2019 v7
Allen Ngo

Chassis
83 / 98 → 84%
Keyboard
77%
Pointing Device
76%
Connectivity
53 / 80 → 66%
Weight
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Battery
59 / 95 → 62%
Display
85%
Games Performance
91%
Application Performance
92%
Temperature
85 / 95 → 90%
Noise
87 / 90 → 96%
Audio
72%
Camera
35 / 85 → 41%
Average
73%
82%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 打了鸡血的ZenBook:华硕ZenBook Pro Duo UX581笔记本电脑评测
Allen Ngo, 2019-12- 4 (Update: 2019-12- 4)