Notebookcheck

索尼 Xperia E5 智能手机简短评测

Marcus Herbrich (translated by Kangfei Zheng), 06/10/2017
Android Touchscreen Smartphone

智能机世界的大门。在我们的测试中,索尼的Xperia E5入门级手机,是低价机中不错的机型。您将在我们的评测中了解到,竞争激烈下,购买它是否值得。

Sony Xperia E5 (Xperia Series)
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memory
1536 MB 
Display
5 inch 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 294 PPI, 电容式触屏, LCD, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.6 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: 200 GB storage via microSD card, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity sensor, accelerometer, gyro, hall Sensor, compass, Mircacast
Networking
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM: 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz, 3G / UMTS: 850 / 900 / 1900 / 1700 / 2100 MHz, 4G/LTE: 700 / 800 / 850 / 1900 / 2600 / 2100 MHz , LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8,2 x 144 x 69
Battery
2300 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix AF, HDR
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, modular power supply, USB cable, Sony UI, 24 Months Warranty, SAR value: 0,461 W/kg (body), fanless
Weight
147 g, Power Supply: 37 g
Price
200 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
368 MBit/s ∼100% +361%
UMI Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
103 MBit/s ∼28% +29%
Sony Xperia E5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
79.9 MBit/s ∼22%
LG K8 2017
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.1 MBit/s ∼15% -32%
Coolpad Modena 2
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
44.5 MBit/s ∼12% -44%
Gigaset GS160
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
33.5 MBit/s ∼9% -58%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
656 MBit/s ∼100% +734%
UMI Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
98.8 MBit/s ∼15% +26%
Sony Xperia E5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
78.7 MBit/s ∼12%
LG K8 2017
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.2 MBit/s ∼8% -37%
Coolpad Modena 2
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.4 MBit/s ∼7% -39%
Gigaset GS160
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.2 MBit/s ∼7% -39%
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Vernee Mars
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
81.1 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.6 MBit/s ∼59%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50 MBit/s ∼100%
Vernee Mars
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
38.9 MBit/s ∼78%
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Sony Xperia E5
GPS Sony Xperia E5
GPS Sony Xperia E5

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
539
cd/m²
542
cd/m²
543
cd/m²
521
cd/m²
538
cd/m²
539
cd/m²
531
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 543 cd/m² Average: 533.6 cd/m² Minimum: 50.23 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 538 cd/m²
Contrast: 1630:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.51
Sony Xperia E5
IPS, 1280x720, 5
LG K8 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Gigaset GS160
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Vernee Mars
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
UMI Max
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
LG G6
IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7
Screen
-34%
-42%
-1%
-20%
-32%
-11%
17%
Brightness
534
351
-34%
479
-10%
339
-37%
302
-43%
420
-21%
498
-7%
611
14%
Brightness Distribution
96
93
-3%
95
-1%
85
-11%
79
-18%
94
-2%
86
-10%
89
-7%
Black Level *
0.33
0.49
-48%
0.55
-67%
0.14
58%
0.15
55%
0.33
-0%
0.23
30%
0.23
30%
Contrast
1630
731
-55%
889
-45%
2464
51%
2080
28%
1255
-23%
2270
39%
2809
72%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.7
7.1
-25%
8.3
-46%
7.1
-25%
8.2
-44%
8.1
-42%
6.9
-21%
4.5
21%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.7
6.5
-38%
8.7
-85%
6.7
-43%
9.2
-96%
9.6
-104%
9.2
-96%
6
-28%
Gamma
2.51 96%
2.12 113%
2.08 115%
2.47 97%
2.29 105%
2 120%
2.38 101%
2.27 106%
CCT
7264 89%
8166 80%
9034 72%
7711 84%
9017 72%
7754 84%
8687 75%
7996 81%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
67.74
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.05

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.6 ms rise
↘ 15.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.2 ms rise
↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
32477 Points ∼14%
LG K8 2017
30924 Points ∼14% -5%
Gigaset GS160
28459 Points ∼12% -12%
Vernee Mars
51008 Points ∼22% +57%
Coolpad Modena 2
24875 Points ∼11% -23%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
23822 Points ∼10% -27%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
30676 Points ∼13% -6%
UMI Max
49057 Points ∼22% +51%
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
45.56 MB/s ∼52%
LG K8 2017
52.23 MB/s ∼60% +15%
Gigaset GS160
19.19 MB/s ∼22% -58%
Vernee Mars
24 MB/s ∼28% -47%
Coolpad Modena 2
18.25 MB/s ∼21% -60%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
12.62 MB/s ∼14% -72%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
16.17 MB/s ∼19% -65%
UMI Max
18.07 MB/s ∼21% -60%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
65.03 MB/s ∼67%
LG K8 2017
78.55 MB/s ∼81% +21%
Gigaset GS160
30.71 MB/s ∼32% -53%
Vernee Mars
44.5 MB/s ∼46% -32%
Coolpad Modena 2
35.59 MB/s ∼37% -45%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
22.77 MB/s ∼24% -65%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
27.68 MB/s ∼29% -57%
UMI Max
36.64 MB/s ∼38% -44%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
9.84 MB/s ∼6%
LG K8 2017
12.5 MB/s ∼8% +27%
Gigaset GS160
6.8 MB/s ∼4% -31%
Vernee Mars
15.77 MB/s ∼10% +60%
Coolpad Modena 2
6.79 MB/s ∼4% -31%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.26 MB/s ∼5% -16%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
7.95 MB/s ∼5% -19%
UMI Max
10.91 MB/s ∼7% +11%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
26.04 MB/s ∼15%
LG K8 2017
41.6 MB/s ∼24% +60%
Gigaset GS160
18.5 MB/s ∼11% -29%
Vernee Mars
21.66 MB/s ∼13% -17%
Coolpad Modena 2
23.03 MB/s ∼13% -12%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
18.24 MB/s ∼11% -30%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
20.25 MB/s ∼12% -22%
UMI Max
26.66 MB/s ∼15% +2%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
83.09 MB/s ∼40%
LG K8 2017
84.6 MB/s ∼41% +2%
Gigaset GS160
46.6 MB/s ∼23% -44%
Vernee Mars
71.58 MB/s ∼35% -14%
Coolpad Modena 2
42.56 MB/s ∼21% -49%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
70.33 MB/s ∼34% -15%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
39.51 MB/s ∼19% -52%
UMI Max
69.5 MB/s ∼34% -16%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
209.69 MB/s ∼26%
LG K8 2017
270.8 MB/s ∼34% +29%
Gigaset GS160
200.5 MB/s ∼25% -4%
Vernee Mars
255.87 MB/s ∼32% +22%
Coolpad Modena 2
147.04 MB/s ∼18% -30%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
187.34 MB/s ∼24% -11%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
178.65 MB/s ∼22% -15%
UMI Max
257.9 MB/s ∼32% +23%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160
1453 Points ∼5%
Vernee Mars
2903 Points ∼11%
Coolpad Modena 2
1274 Points ∼5%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1588 Points ∼6%
UMI Max
2701 Points ∼10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160
518 Points ∼9%
Vernee Mars
729 Points ∼13%
Coolpad Modena 2
459 Points ∼8%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
572 Points ∼10%
UMI Max
734 Points ∼13%
Geekbench 4.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
1527 Points ∼8%
LG K8 2017
1737 Points ∼9% +14%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
556 Points ∼11%
LG K8 2017
642 Points ∼13% +15%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
835 Points ∼28%
LG K8 2017
Points ∼0% -100%
Vernee Mars
1338 Points ∼44% +60%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
609 Points ∼20% -27%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
882 Points ∼29% +6%
UMI Max
1247 Points ∼41% +49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
100 Points ∼2%
LG K8 2017
Points ∼0% -100%
Vernee Mars
356 Points ∼7% +256%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
65 Points ∼1% -35%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
102 Points ∼2% +2%
UMI Max
354 Points ∼7% +254%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
124 Points ∼3%
LG K8 2017
Points ∼0% -100%
Vernee Mars
425 Points ∼11% +243%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
81 Points ∼2% -35%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
127 Points ∼3% +2%
UMI Max
421 Points ∼11% +240%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
817 Points ∼27%
LG K8 2017
622 Points ∼21% -24%
Vernee Mars
1100 Points ∼37% +35%
Coolpad Modena 2
621 Points ∼21% -24%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
618 Points ∼21% -24%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
831 Points ∼28% +2%
UMI Max
1239 Points ∼41% +52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
175 Points ∼2%
LG K8 2017
31 Points ∼0% -82%
Vernee Mars
523 Points ∼7% +199%
Coolpad Modena 2
106 Points ∼1% -39%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
101 Points ∼1% -42%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
172 Points ∼2% -2%
UMI Max
521 Points ∼7% +198%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
212 Points ∼4%
LG K8 2017
39 Points ∼1% -82%
Vernee Mars
602 Points ∼12% +184%
Coolpad Modena 2
130 Points ∼3% -39%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
124 Points ∼2% -42%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
209 Points ∼4% -1%
UMI Max
598 Points ∼12% +182%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
9349 Points ∼13%
LG K8 2017
6656 Points ∼9% -29%
Gigaset GS160
7881 Points ∼11% -16%
Vernee Mars
10762 Points ∼15% +15%
Coolpad Modena 2
7061 Points ∼10% -24%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
7026 Points ∼10% -25%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
9768 Points ∼14% +4%
UMI Max
12239 Points ∼17% +31%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
4615 Points ∼1%
LG K8 2017
2546 Points ∼1% -45%
Gigaset GS160
3291 Points ∼1% -29%
Vernee Mars
10685 Points ∼2% +132%
Coolpad Modena 2
2789 Points ∼1% -40%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2645 Points ∼1% -43%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4333 Points ∼1% -6%
UMI Max
10612 Points ∼2% +130%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
5200 Points ∼3%
LG K8 2017
2951 Points ∼1% -43%
Gigaset GS160
3780 Points ∼2% -27%
Vernee Mars
10702 Points ∼5% +106%
Coolpad Modena 2
3222 Points ∼2% -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3070 Points ∼2% -41%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4944 Points ∼3% -5%
UMI Max
10942 Points ∼6% +110%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
8.4 fps ∼1%
LG K8 2017
3.4 fps ∼0% -60%
Gigaset GS160
6 fps ∼0% -29%
Vernee Mars
17 fps ∼1% +102%
Coolpad Modena 2
5 fps ∼0% -40%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
4.9 fps ∼0% -42%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
14 fps ∼1% +67%
UMI Max
17 fps ∼1% +102%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
15 fps ∼3%
LG K8 2017
6.4 fps ∼1% -57%
Gigaset GS160
11 fps ∼2% -27%
Vernee Mars
18 fps ∼4% +20%
Coolpad Modena 2
8.9 fps ∼2% -41%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.2 fps ∼2% -45%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
8.4 fps ∼2% -44%
UMI Max
17 fps ∼4% +13%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
3 fps ∼1%
LG K8 2017
1.3 fps ∼0% -57%
Gigaset GS160
2.1 fps ∼0% -30%
Vernee Mars
7.1 fps ∼1% +137%
Coolpad Modena 2
1.8 fps ∼0% -40%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3.4 fps ∼1% +13%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
6 fps ∼1% +100%
UMI Max
7.1 fps ∼1% +137%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
6 fps ∼2%
LG K8 2017
3.7 fps ∼1% -38%
Gigaset GS160
4.7 fps ∼1% -22%
Vernee Mars
7.6 fps ∼2% +27%
Coolpad Modena 2
4 fps ∼1% -33%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.8 fps ∼0% -70%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
3 fps ∼1% -50%
UMI Max
7.1 fps ∼2% +18%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
1.9 fps ∼0%
LG K8 2017
fps ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS160
1.4 fps ∼0% -26%
Vernee Mars
4.8 fps ∼1% +153%
Coolpad Modena 2
2.9 fps ∼1% +53%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2.5 fps ∼1% +32%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4.4 fps ∼1% +132%
UMI Max
4.7 fps ∼1% +147%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
3.4 fps ∼2%
LG K8 2017
fps ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS160
3.4 fps ∼2% 0%
Vernee Mars
5.1 fps ∼3% +50%
Coolpad Modena 2
1.2 fps ∼1% -65%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.2 fps ∼1% -65%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1.9 fps ∼1% -44%
UMI Max
4.7 fps ∼3% +38%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
3817 Points ∼46%
LG K8 2017
4673 Points ∼56% +22%
Gigaset GS160
2563 Points ∼31% -33%
Vernee Mars
4554 Points ∼55% +19%
Coolpad Modena 2
3119 Points ∼38% -18%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
3813 Points ∼46% 0%
UMI Max
4485 Points ∼54% +18%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
639 Points ∼41%
LG K8 2017
616 Points ∼40% -4%
Gigaset GS160
9 Points ∼1% -99%
Vernee Mars
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Coolpad Modena 2
565 Points ∼37% -12%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
592 Points ∼38% -7%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
10 Points ∼1% -98%
UMI Max
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
280 Points ∼3%
LG K8 2017
436 Points ∼5% +56%
Gigaset GS160
208 Points ∼2% -26%
Vernee Mars
665 Points ∼8% +138%
Coolpad Modena 2
178 Points ∼2% -36%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
174 Points ∼2% -38%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
286 Points ∼3% +2%
UMI Max
666 Points ∼8% +138%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
552 Points ∼12%
LG K8 2017
634 Points ∼14% +15%
Gigaset GS160
497 Points ∼11% -10%
Vernee Mars
1005 Points ∼23% +82%
Coolpad Modena 2
598 Points ∼14% +8%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
487 Points ∼11% -12%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
450 Points ∼10% -18%
UMI Max
998 Points ∼23% +81%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
1091 Points ∼17%
LG K8 2017
1191 Points ∼18% +9%
Gigaset GS160
1029 Points ∼16% -6%
Vernee Mars
2291 Points ∼35% +110%
Coolpad Modena 2
909 Points ∼14% -17%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
801 Points ∼12% -27%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1090 Points ∼17% 0%
UMI Max
2123 Points ∼32% +95%
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
567 Points ∼15%
LG K8 2017
371 Points ∼10% -35%
Gigaset GS160
178 Points ∼5% -69%
Vernee Mars
348 Points ∼9% -39%
Coolpad Modena 2
483 Points ∼13% -15%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
448 Points ∼12% -21%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
192 Points ∼5% -66%
UMI Max
341 Points ∼9% -40%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
17.885 Points ∼5%
LG K8 2017
17.124 Points ∼5% -4%
Gigaset GS160
14.428 Points ∼4% -19%
Vernee Mars
27.099 Points ∼8% +52%
Coolpad Modena 2
13.15 Points ∼4% -26%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
12.729 Points ∼4% -29%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
18.028 Points ∼5% +1%
UMI Max
25.502 Points ∼8% +43%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
2910 Points ∼6%
LG K8 2017
3052 Points ∼6% +5%
Gigaset GS160
2493 Points ∼5% -14%
Vernee Mars
4073 Points ∼8% +40%
Coolpad Modena 2
1975 Points ∼4% -32%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1910 Points ∼4% -34%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
2697 Points ∼5% -7%
UMI Max
4231 Points ∼9% +45%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia E5
13232.4 ms * ∼22%
LG K8 2017
10742 ms * ∼18% +19%
Gigaset GS160
13907.4 ms * ∼23% -5%
Vernee Mars
9376.1 ms * ∼16% +29%
Coolpad Modena 2
19647.2 ms * ∼33% -48%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
19234.4 ms * ∼32% -45%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
12910 ms * ∼22% +2%
UMI Max
9795.6 ms * ∼16% +26%

Legend

 
Sony Xperia E5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K8 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425, Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS160 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Vernee Mars Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Coolpad Modena 2 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V7 Lite Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Zest Plus Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Max Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 44 °C41.1 °C35.3 °C 
 42.6 °C43.3 °C36.9 °C 
 41.8 °C43 °C35.5 °C 
Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 40.4 °C
35.9 °C38.7 °C45.6 °C
34.4 °C41 °C45.6 °C
34 °C39.2 °C44.2 °C
Maximum: 45.6 °C
Average: 39.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  30.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.72525.433.33125.332.14032.926.45033.626.26331.633.38028.430.51002734.312520.832.61602231.520021.336.625020.841.731521.244.640019.449.750019.554.863017.761.480017.966.1100017.865.9125017.366.9160017.463.6200016.758.6250017.263.3315018.265.9400017.969.1500017.669.2630017.764.7800017.858.51000017.952.91250018.140.21600018.229.5SPL3076.5N1.337.3median 17.9Sony Xperia E5median 58.5Delta1.312.831.633.725.428.625.332.732.930.233.643.231.633.628.425.62722.920.822.52226.321.325.520.831.921.241.119.448.519.559.317.76517.96917.875.517.375.617.474.216.775.817.273.918.272.517.972.317.675.917.775.817.876.217.976.618.16618.249.23086.11.363.5median 17.9Coolpad Modena 2median 691.316.631.644.425.43425.335.932.931.733.630.931.637.828.424.92726.320.827.42225.421.325.620.826.521.229.619.437.119.545.217.754.417.965.517.876.617.378.917.477.716.774.417.273.418.272.417.97017.668.517.768.517.871.917.969.518.163.818.255.93085.61.355median 17.9LG K8 2017median 65.51.317.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Sony Xperia E5 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Coolpad Modena 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.12 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 40.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

LG K8 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.59 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.34 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.03 / 2.06 / 2.12 Watt
Load midlight 5.01 / 5.04 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia E5
2300 mAh
LG K8 2017
2500 mAh
Gigaset GS160
2500 mAh
Vernee Mars
3000 mAh
Coolpad Modena 2
2500 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
5000 mAh
UMI Max
4000 mAh
Power Consumption
28%
19%
2%
8%
34%
12%
27%
Idle Minimum *
1.03
0.65
37%
0.56
46%
1.02
1%
0.64
38%
0.63
39%
0.83
19%
1.02
1%
Idle Average *
2.06
1.6
22%
1.7
17%
1.69
18%
1.96
5%
1.37
33%
2.06
-0%
1.53
26%
Idle Maximum *
2.12
1.62
24%
1.75
17%
1.82
14%
1.98
7%
1.71
19%
2.08
2%
1.62
24%
Load Average *
5.01
2.97
41%
4.17
17%
4.39
12%
4.99
-0%
2.82
44%
3.53
30%
2.91
42%
Load Maximum *
5.04
4.34
14%
5.07
-1%
6.79
-35%
5.48
-9%
3.36
33%
4.49
11%
2.93
42%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
WiFi Surfing v1.3
7h 02min
Sony Xperia E5
2300 mAh
LG K8 2017
2500 mAh
Gigaset GS160
2500 mAh
Vernee Mars
3000 mAh
Coolpad Modena 2
2500 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
5000 mAh
UMI Max
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
422
594
41%
615
46%
427
1%
518
23%
517
23%
815
93%
588
39%

Pros

+ 高亮度的IPS面板
+ 精确的GPS模块
+ 性能(考虑到系统芯片)
+ NFC
+ 设计和做工
+ 快速SD卡插槽

Cons

- 缓慢的系统芯片
- 部分地方偏热
- 扬声器
- 电池续航(与竞争对手相比)
- 摄像头
In the test: Sony Xperia E5. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de
In the test: Sony Xperia E5. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

在我们的测试中,索尼的入门机在高对比度IPS HD面板和便携性方面得分。Xperia E5做工不错,带有一个,虽然看起来很薄但还不错的塑料外壳。而它的对手则用玻璃(UHANS S1)或金属 (Vernee Mars) ,因此有高质量的感觉。

低性能 MediaTek quad-core 系统芯片 和1.5 GB 内存的结合保证了(让人出乎意料地)系统顺畅度, 由于相对高速的16 GB eMMC 存储, 应用程序的打开不太花时间。另外,Xperia E5 的GPS定位能力在同等价位产品中很出众。

我们给以下方面负面评价:由于相对较高的功耗和发热,索尼智能手机的续航时间比竞争对手低。此外,摄像头和扬声器的质量不算好。

Xperia E5是低价位机型中,您坚实的日常伴侣。然而,如果应用索尼高价格段Xperia智能手机才拥有的精妙玻璃设计,或许可以让入门级设备拥有独一无二的特质。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Sony Xperia E5 - 06/06/2017 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
80%
Keyboard
60 / 75 → 79%
Pointing Device
84%
Connectivity
41 / 60 → 68%
Weight
93%
Battery
89%
Display
83%
Games Performance
8 / 63 → 13%
Application Performance
34 / 70 → 49%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
48 / 91 → 52%
Camera
48%
Average
66%
77%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 索尼 Xperia E5 智能手机简短评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2017-06-10 (Update: 2017-06-11)