Notebookcheck

索尼 Xperia L1 智能手机简短评测

Florian Wimmer (translated by Kangfei Zheng), 08/25/2017
Touchscreen Smartphone Android ARM

坚固好看。如果您不认为“坚固”是贬义词,而是将该词与可靠性和可信赖性连接起来,那么索尼Xperia L1可能会适合您。在某种意义上,它在许多领域提供了坚实的表现。不多不少。

Sony Xperia L1 (Xperia Series)
Processor
Mediatek MT6737T
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memory
2048 MB 
Display
5.5 inch 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 267 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.2 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio combo, Card Reader: microSD up to 256 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B2/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20); bandwidth (download/upload): 150Mbps/​50Mbps; SAR value: 0.69W/​kg (head), 1.01W/​kg (body), LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.7 x 151 x 74
Battery
9.9 Wh, 2620 mAh Lithium-Ion, adaptive charging technology
Operating System
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.2, contrast AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.2, videos @1080p
Additional features
Speakers: speakers at the bottom edge, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, USB power supply USB cable, Xperia Lounge, AVG Protection, What's New, 24 Months Warranty, FM radio, Bluetooth aptX, , fanless
Weight
180 g, Power Supply: 68 g
Price
199 Euro

 

Sony Xperia L1
Sony Xperia L1
Sony Xperia L1
Sony Xperia L1
Sony Xperia L1
Sony Xperia L1
Sony Xperia L1
Sony Xperia L1

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8928, 32 GB eMMC Flash (AVM FritzBox 6490 Cable)
101 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Sony Xperia L1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
92.2 MBit/s ∼91%
Honor 6X
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
54.6 MBit/s ∼54% -41%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash (AVM Fritz!Box 6490 Cable)
54.5 MBit/s ∼54% -41%
LG K10 2017
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
46.2 MBit/s ∼46% -50%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8928, 32 GB eMMC Flash (AVM FritzBox 6490 Cable)
104 MBit/s ∼100% +17%
Sony Xperia L1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
88.6 MBit/s ∼85%
Honor 6X
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
57.9 MBit/s ∼56% -35%
LG K10 2017
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
54.6 MBit/s ∼53% -38%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash (AVM Fritz!Box 6490 Cable)
53.9 MBit/s ∼52% -39%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - junction
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - junction
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - bridge
GPs Sony Xperia L1 - overview
GPs Sony Xperia L1 - overview
GPs Sony Xperia L1 - junction
GPs Sony Xperia L1 - junction
GPs Sony Xperia L1 - bridge
GPs Sony Xperia L1 - bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
469
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 494 cd/m² Average: 477.7 cd/m² Minimum: 6.24 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 479 cd/m²
Contrast: 826:1 (Black: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.03
Sony Xperia L1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
LG K10 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3
Honor 6X
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Huawei P8 lite 2017
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Screen
-8%
-6%
6%
-3%
Brightness
478
350
-27%
540
13%
559
17%
369
-23%
Brightness Distribution
94
85
-10%
94
0%
91
-3%
92
-2%
Black Level *
0.58
0.36
38%
0.57
2%
0.39
33%
0.26
55%
Contrast
826
1067
29%
960
16%
1474
78%
1462
77%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
6
-33%
5.1
-13%
5.2
-16%
6.6
-47%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.1
5.9
-44%
6.2
-51%
7.2
-76%
7.4
-80%
Gamma
2.03 118%
2 120%
2.09 115%
2.4 100%
2.29 105%
CCT
7139 91%
8042 81%
6546 99%
7224 90%
8665 75%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 25510 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 25510 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 25510 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
37495 Points ∼16%
LG K10 2017
39063 Points ∼17% +4%
Honor 6X
56764 Points ∼25% +51%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
56798 Points ∼25% +51%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
24799 Points ∼11% -34%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
3237 Points ∼47%
LG K10 2017
3167 Points ∼46% -2%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
4285 Points ∼52%
Honor 6X
4383 Points ∼53% +2%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
4419 Points ∼53% +3%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
2383 Points ∼29% -44%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
743 Points ∼48%
LG K10 2017
1137 Points ∼74% +53%
Honor 6X
720 Points ∼47% -3%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
10 Points ∼1% -99%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
573 Points ∼37% -23%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
386 Points ∼4%
LG K10 2017
508 Points ∼6% +32%
Honor 6X
819 Points ∼10% +112%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
826 Points ∼10% +114%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
346 Points ∼4% -10%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
798 Points ∼18%
LG K10 2017
623 Points ∼14% -22%
Honor 6X
1779 Points ∼40% +123%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
1658 Points ∼37% +108%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
421 Points ∼10% -47%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
1338 Points ∼20%
LG K10 2017
1259 Points ∼19% -6%
Honor 6X
2721 Points ∼41% +103%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
2694 Points ∼41% +101%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
858 Points ∼13% -36%
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
744 Points ∼20%
LG K10 2017
821 Points ∼22% +10%
Honor 6X
1300 Points ∼34% +75%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
435 Points ∼11% -42%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
517 Points ∼14% -31%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
1241 Points ∼15%
LG K10 2017
1480 Points ∼17% +19%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
1875 Points ∼10%
LG K10 2017
2311 Points ∼13% +23%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
674 Points ∼14%
LG K10 2017
593 Points ∼12% -12%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
968 Points ∼32%
LG K10 2017
1047 Points ∼35% +8%
Honor 6X
1440 Points ∼48% +49%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
1532 Points ∼51% +58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
149 Points ∼3%
LG K10 2017
252 Points ∼5% +69%
Honor 6X
318 Points ∼6% +113%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
321 Points ∼6% +115%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
184 Points ∼5%
LG K10 2017
303 Points ∼8% +65%
Honor 6X
385 Points ∼10% +109%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
389 Points ∼10% +111%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
939 Points ∼31%
LG K10 2017
1105 Points ∼37% +18%
Honor 6X
1433 Points ∼48% +53%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
1547 Points ∼51% +65%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
813 Points ∼27% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
238 Points ∼3%
LG K10 2017
380 Points ∼5% +60%
Honor 6X
468 Points ∼6% +97%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
516 Points ∼7% +117%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
46 Points ∼1% -81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
285 Points ∼6%
LG K10 2017
445 Points ∼9% +56%
Honor 6X
550 Points ∼11% +93%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
606 Points ∼12% +113%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
58 Points ∼1% -80%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
10767 Points ∼15%
LG K10 2017
8223 Points ∼11% -24%
Honor 6X
13535 Points ∼19% +26%
Honor 6X
13535 Points ∼19% +26%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
13590 Points ∼19% +26%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
6015 Points ∼1%
LG K10 2017
7936 Points ∼2% +32%
Honor 6X
11353 Points ∼2% +89%
Honor 6X
11353 Points ∼2% +89%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
11147 Points ∼2% +85%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
6669 Points ∼3%
LG K10 2017
7998 Points ∼4% +20%
Honor 6X
11775 Points ∼6% +77%
Honor 6X
11775 Points ∼6% +77%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
11611 Points ∼6% +74%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
4675 Points ∼2% -30%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
11 fps ∼1%
LG K10 2017
13 fps ∼1% +18%
Honor 6X
18 fps ∼1% +64%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
18 fps ∼1% +64%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
5.7 fps ∼0% -48%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
19 fps ∼4%
LG K10 2017
22 fps ∼5% +16%
Honor 6X
19 fps ∼4% 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
19 fps ∼4% 0%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
10 fps ∼2% -47%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
4.1 fps ∼1%
LG K10 2017
5.3 fps ∼1% +29%
Honor 6X
4.6 fps ∼1% +12%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
7.9 fps ∼1% +93%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
2 fps ∼0% -51%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
8.8 fps ∼2%
LG K10 2017
11 fps ∼3% +25%
Honor 6X
8.5 fps ∼2% -3%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
8.5 fps ∼2% -3%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
4.2 fps ∼1% -52%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
2.6 fps ∼1%
LG K10 2017
3.5 fps ∼1% +35%
Honor 6X
2.5 fps ∼1% -4%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
4.6 fps ∼1% +77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
6.3 fps ∼4%
LG K10 2017
8.6 fps ∼5% +37%
Honor 6X
4.9 fps ∼3% -22%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
5 fps ∼3% -21%

Legend

 
Sony Xperia L1 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K10 2017 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 6X HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P8 lite 2017 HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Huawei P8 lite 2017
29.499 Points ∼100% +70%
Honor 6X
26.464 Points ∼90% +52%
LG K10 2017
20.838 Points ∼71% +20%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
18.22 Points ∼62% +5%
Sony Xperia L1
17.372 Points ∼59%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P8 lite 2017
4630 Points ∼100% +73%
Honor 6X
4199 Points ∼91% +56%
LG K10 2017
3407 Points ∼74% +27%
Sony Xperia L1
2684 Points ∼58%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
2141 Points ∼46% -20%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Sony Xperia L1
12506.5 ms * ∼100%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
12145 ms * ∼97% +3%
LG K10 2017
11708.2 ms * ∼94% +6%
Honor 6X
9373.3 ms * ∼75% +25%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
8768.2 ms * ∼70% +30%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Honor 6X
73 Points ∼100% +22%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
62 Points ∼85% +3%
Sony Xperia L1
60 Points ∼82%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
51 Points ∼70% -15%
LG K10 2017
34 Points ∼47% -43%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
LG K10 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
61.63 MB/s ∼100% +135%
Honor 6X (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
34.53 MB/s ∼56% +32%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
32.1 MB/s ∼52% +22%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
29.2 MB/s ∼47% +11%
Sony Xperia L1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
26.25 MB/s ∼43%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
LG K10 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
77.4 MB/s ∼100% +105%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
53.1 MB/s ∼69% +40%
Honor 6X (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
52.02 MB/s ∼67% +38%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
47.7 MB/s ∼62% +26%
Sony Xperia L1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
37.81 MB/s ∼49%
Random Write 4KB
Honor 6X
45.05 MB/s ∼100% +664%
LG K10 2017
10.8 MB/s ∼24% +83%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
8 MB/s ∼18% +36%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
7.94 MB/s ∼18% +35%
Sony Xperia L1
5.9 MB/s ∼13%
Random Read 4KB
Honor 6X
39.55 MB/s ∼100% +191%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
38.7 MB/s ∼98% +185%
LG K10 2017
25.1 MB/s ∼63% +85%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
17.03 MB/s ∼43% +25%
Sony Xperia L1
13.6 MB/s ∼34%
Sequential Write 256KB
Honor 6X
73.85 MB/s ∼100% +84%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
60.62 MB/s ∼82% +51%
LG K10 2017
43.6 MB/s ∼59% +8%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
42 MB/s ∼57% +4%
Sony Xperia L1
40.2 MB/s ∼54%
Sequential Read 256KB
Honor 6X
283.37 MB/s ∼100% +56%
LG K10 2017
246.1 MB/s ∼87% +35%
Sony Xperia L1
181.9 MB/s ∼64%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
165.8 MB/s ∼59% -9%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
149.4 MB/s ∼53% -18%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high22 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
Max. Load
 44.4 °C43.8 °C34.4 °C 
 45.4 °C43.4 °C34.4 °C 
 44.9 °C43 °C34.2 °C 
Maximum: 45.4 °C
Average: 40.9 °C
33 °C34.3 °C43.6 °C
32.5 °C34.4 °C45.5 °C
33.4 °C39.6 °C46.4 °C
Maximum: 46.4 °C
Average: 38.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  29.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.632.92525.4333125.333.54032.932.95033.635.36331.638.38028.428.5100272812520.833.41602228.420021.330.825020.842.531521.248.240019.456.850019.563.463017.768.780017.974.6100017.876.6125017.376.8160017.474.6200016.776.1250017.273.9315018.274400017.979.6500017.682.3630017.784.2800017.877.41000017.973.51250018.172.21600018.269SPL3089.4N1.379.4median 17.9Sony Xperia L1median 73.5Delta1.312.631.642.625.437.525.334.632.931.333.630.931.632.428.429.72728.420.829.22231.721.336.920.84621.252.319.455.819.559.117.760.817.966.617.871.517.37517.472.316.772.717.271.618.270.717.967.617.666.617.761.617.856.517.957.118.156.918.242.23081.91.346.3median 17.9Honor 6Xmedian 59.11.311hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Sony Xperia L1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Honor 6X audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.37 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.89 / 2.05 / 2.18 Watt
Load midlight 6.02 / 6.94 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia L1
2620 mAh
LG K10 2017
2800 mAh
Honor 6X
3340 mAh
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
30%
18%
-13%
Idle Minimum *
0.89
0.76
15%
0.82
8%
1.44
-62%
Idle Average *
2.05
1.59
22%
2
2%
2.47
-20%
Idle Maximum *
2.18
1.61
26%
2.03
7%
2.58
-18%
Load Average *
6.02
3.24
46%
3.34
45%
4.55
24%
Load Maximum *
6.94
4.15
40%
4.92
29%
6.3
9%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
23h 18min
WiFi Surfing v1.3
9h 27min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 56min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 43min
Sony Xperia L1
2620 mAh
LG K10 2017
2800 mAh
Honor 6X
3340 mAh
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3000 mAh
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
2700 mAh
Battery Runtime
7%
58%
7%
2%
Reader / Idle
1398
1477
6%
2250
61%
1326
-5%
1485
6%
H.264
656
613
-7%
885
35%
644
-2%
622
-5%
WiFi v1.3
567
532
-6%
957
69%
604
7%
574
1%
Load
223
298
34%
375
68%
283
27%
234
5%

Pros

+ 优秀的外观设计
+ NFC,USB OTG,USB C
+ 广泛和数量众多的最新软件
+ 快速Wi-Fi
+ 精确的GPS
+ 握感好
+ 相当明亮的显示屏,色彩准确性好
+ 日常生活下,良好的电池运行时间

Cons

- 压敏外壳
- 粗糙的表面,需要习惯
- 很多预装软件
- 平庸的麦克风质量
- 相机拍摄的图像平庸
- 显示屏具有较高的黑色值
- 性能比较低
- 最高温度高
- 负载高耗能
Review: Sony Xperia L1. Test unit provided by notebookcheck.de
Review: Sony Xperia L1. Test unit provided by notebookcheck.de

索尼Xperia L1是一款中低档的智能手机,在大多数领域都表现出色。如果您不期待您的智能手机比做日常操作和偶尔拍摄照片还多的活动,您将对此设备非常满意。虽然说,有些人可能会抱怨系统中的预装软件,还有负载下的可能会令人烦恼的高温。索尼Xperia L1在几个方面非常有说服力:精确的GPS模块,大量最新的软件,良好的输入设备和颜色精度良好的显示器。

屏幕,相机和电池续航时间都满足了我们对Xperia L1价格的预期。该机靠其精美的外观和精确的GPS模块而脱颖而出。如果您只想要一个运作良好的智能手机,您将对Xperia L1感到非常满意。

如果你希望你的智能手机拥有高分辨率屏幕、更多的内存、以及一个更好的屏幕,你可以选择稍微贵点的 荣耀 6X 。但是,如果你想获得一个可靠的而且价格不错的手机Xperia L1 可能会是你的选择。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Sony Xperia L1 - 07/27/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
36 / 60 → 60%
Weight
90%
Battery
92%
Display
85%
Games Performance
11 / 63 → 18%
Application Performance
36 / 70 → 52%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
51 / 91 → 56%
Camera
59%
Average
68%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 索尼 Xperia L1 智能手机简短评测
Florian Wimmer, 2017-08-25 (Update: 2017-08-25)