索尼 Xperia L1 智能手机简短评测

Name: Sony Xperia L1
Brand: Sony

坚固好看。如果您不认为“坚固”是贬义词，而是将该词与可靠性和可信赖性连接起来，那么索尼Xperia L1可能会适合您。在某种意义上，它在许多领域提供了坚实的表现。不多不少。

Florian Wimmer, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 08/25/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Touchscreen Smartphone Android ARM

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Sony Xperia L1 (Xperia Series)

Processor

Mediatek MT6737T 4 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T720 MP2

Memory

2048 MB

Display

5.50 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 267 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10.2 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio combo, Card Reader: microSD up to 256 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, proximity sensor, compass

Networking

802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20); bandwidth (download/upload): 150Mbps/50Mbps; SAR value: 0.69W/kg (head), 1.01W/kg (body), LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.7 x 151 x 74

Battery

9.9 Wh, 2620 mAh Lithium-Ion, adaptive charging technology

Operating System

Android 7.0 Nougat

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, contrast AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2, videos @1080p

Additional features

Speakers: speakers at the bottom edge, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, USB power supply USB cable, Xperia Lounge, AVG Protection, What's New, 24 Months Warranty, FM radio, Bluetooth aptX, , fanless

Weight

180 g, Power Supply: 68 g

Price

199 Euro

Links

Sony homepage
Sony notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle Adreno 305, 400 MSM8928, 32 GB eMMC Flash (AVM FritzBox 6490 Cable)	104 MBit/s +17%
Sony Xperia L1 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)	88.6 MBit/s
Honor 6X Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)	57.9 MBit/s -35%
LG K10 2017 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)	54.6 MBit/s -38%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash (AVM Fritz!Box 6490 Cable)	53.9 MBit/s -39%
iperf3 receive AX12
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle Adreno 305, 400 MSM8928, 32 GB eMMC Flash (AVM FritzBox 6490 Cable)	101 MBit/s +10%
Sony Xperia L1 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)	92.2 MBit/s
Honor 6X Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)	54.6 MBit/s -41%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash (AVM Fritz!Box 6490 Cable)	54.5 MBit/s -41%
LG K10 2017 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)	46.2 MBit/s -50%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Sony Xperia L1

Huawei Mate 9

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Sony Xperia L1

Huawei Mate 9

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Sony Xperia L1

Huawei Mate 9

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus

Canon EOS 70D


469 cd/m²	470 cd/m²	470 cd/m²
486 cd/m²	479 cd/m²	485 cd/m²
494 cd/m²	480 cd/m²	466 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 494 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 477.7 cd/m² Minimum: 6.24 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 479 cd/m²
Contrast: 826:1 (Black: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.03

	Sony Xperia L1 IPS, 1280x720, 5.50	LG K10 2017 IPS, 1280x720, 5.30	Honor 6X IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50	Huawei P8 lite 2017 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20	HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle IPS, 1280x720, 5.50
Screen		-19%	-5%	2%	-10%
Brightness middle	479	384 -20%	547 14%	575 20%	380 -21%
Brightness	478	350 -27%	540 13%	559 17%	369 -23%
Brightness Distribution	94	85 -10%	94 0%	91 -3%	92 -2%
Black Level *	0.58	0.36 38%	0.57 2%	0.39 33%	0.26 55%
Contrast	826	1067 29%	960 16%	1474 78%	1462 77%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.5	6 -33%	5.1 -13%	5.2 -16%	6.6 -47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.5	14 -87%	9.1 -21%	10.3 -37%	10.4 -39%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.1	5.9 -44%	6.2 -51%	7.2 -76%	7.4 -80%
Gamma	2.03 ^108%	2 ^110%	2.09 ^105%	2.4 ^92%	2.29 ^96%
CCT	7139 ^91%	8042 ^81%	6546 ^99%	7224 ^90%	8665 ^75%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

25510 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 25510 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 25510 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	37495 Points
LG K10 2017	39063 Points +4%
Honor 6X	56764 Points +51%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	56798 Points +51%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	24799 Points -34%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	4285 Points
Honor 6X	4383 Points +2%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	4419 Points +3%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	2383 Points -44%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	3237 Points
LG K10 2017	3167 Points -2%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	744 Points
LG K10 2017	821 Points +10%
Honor 6X	1300 Points +75%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	435 Points -42%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	517 Points -31%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	1338 Points
LG K10 2017	1259 Points -6%
Honor 6X	2721 Points +103%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	2694 Points +101%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	858 Points -36%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	798 Points
LG K10 2017	623 Points -22%
Honor 6X	1779 Points +123%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	1658 Points +108%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	421 Points -47%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	386 Points
LG K10 2017	508 Points +32%
Honor 6X	819 Points +112%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	826 Points +114%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	346 Points -10%
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	743 Points
LG K10 2017	1137 Points +53%
Honor 6X	720 Points -3%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	10 Points -99%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	573 Points -23%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	674 Points
LG K10 2017	593 Points -12%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	1875 Points
LG K10 2017	2311 Points +23%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	1241 Points
LG K10 2017	1480 Points +19%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	6669 Points
LG K10 2017	7998 Points +20%
Honor 6X	11775 Points +77%
Honor 6X	11775 Points +77%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	11611 Points +74%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	4675 Points -30%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	6015 Points
LG K10 2017	7936 Points +32%
Honor 6X	11353 Points +89%
Honor 6X	11353 Points +89%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	11147 Points +85%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	10767 Points
LG K10 2017	8223 Points -24%
Honor 6X	13535 Points +26%
Honor 6X	13535 Points +26%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	13590 Points +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	285 Points
LG K10 2017	445 Points +56%
Honor 6X	550 Points +93%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	606 Points +113%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	58 Points -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	238 Points
LG K10 2017	380 Points +60%
Honor 6X	468 Points +97%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	516 Points +117%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	46 Points -81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	939 Points
LG K10 2017	1105 Points +18%
Honor 6X	1433 Points +53%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	1547 Points +65%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	813 Points -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	184 Points
LG K10 2017	303 Points +65%
Honor 6X	385 Points +109%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	389 Points +111%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	149 Points
LG K10 2017	252 Points +69%
Honor 6X	318 Points +113%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	321 Points +115%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	968 Points
LG K10 2017	1047 Points +8%
Honor 6X	1440 Points +49%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	1532 Points +58%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	19 fps
LG K10 2017	22 fps +16%
Honor 6X	19 fps 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	19 fps 0%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	10 fps -47%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	11 fps
LG K10 2017	13 fps +18%
Honor 6X	18 fps +64%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	18 fps +64%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	5.7 fps -48%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	8.8 fps
LG K10 2017	11 fps +25%
Honor 6X	8.5 fps -3%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	8.5 fps -3%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	4.2 fps -52%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	4.1 fps
LG K10 2017	5.3 fps +29%
Honor 6X	4.6 fps +12%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	7.9 fps +93%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	2 fps -51%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	6.3 fps
LG K10 2017	8.6 fps +37%
Honor 6X	4.9 fps -22%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	5 fps -21%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	2.6 fps
LG K10 2017	3.5 fps +35%
Honor 6X	2.5 fps -4%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	4.6 fps +77%

Legend

Sony Xperia L1 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

LG K10 2017 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Honor 6X HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P8 lite 2017 HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 32 GB eMMC Flash

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei P8 lite 2017	29.5 Points +70%
Honor 6X	26.46 Points +52%
LG K10 2017	20.84 Points +20%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	18.22 Points +5%
Sony Xperia L1	17.37 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P8 lite 2017	4630 Points +73%
Honor 6X	4199 Points +56%
LG K10 2017	3407 Points +27%
Sony Xperia L1	2684 Points
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	2141 Points -20%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia L1	12507 ms *
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	12145 ms * +3%
LG K10 2017	11708 ms * +6%
Honor 6X	9373 ms * +25%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	8768 ms * +30%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Honor 6X	73 Points +22%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	62 Points +3%
Sony Xperia L1	60 Points
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	51 Points -15%
LG K10 2017	34 Points -43%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB
Honor 6X	283.4 MB/s +56%
LG K10 2017	246.1 MB/s +35%
Sony Xperia L1	181.9 MB/s
Huawei P8 lite 2017	165.8 MB/s -9%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	149.4 MB/s -18%
Sequential Write 256KB
Honor 6X	73.8 MB/s +84%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	60.6 MB/s +51%
LG K10 2017	43.6 MB/s +8%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	42 MB/s +4%
Sony Xperia L1	40.2 MB/s
Random Read 4KB
Honor 6X	39.55 MB/s +191%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	38.7 MB/s +185%
LG K10 2017	25.1 MB/s +85%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	17.03 MB/s +25%
Sony Xperia L1	13.6 MB/s
Random Write 4KB
Honor 6X	45.05 MB/s +664%
LG K10 2017	10.8 MB/s +83%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	8 MB/s +36%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	7.94 MB/s +35%
Sony Xperia L1	5.9 MB/s
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
LG K10 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	77.4 MB/s +105%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	53.1 MB/s +40%
Honor 6X (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	52 MB/s +38%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	47.7 MB/s +26%
Sony Xperia L1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	37.81 MB/s
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
LG K10 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	61.6 MB/s +135%
Honor 6X (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	34.53 MB/s +32%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	32.1 MB/s +22%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	29.2 MB/s +11%
Sony Xperia L1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	26.25 MB/s

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Settings	Value
	high	22 fps
	very low	30 fps

... in comparison

Dead Trigger 2
	Settings	Value
	high	30 fps

... in comparison

Max. Load

Idle


44.4 °C	43.8 °C	34.4 °C
45.4 °C	43.4 °C	34.4 °C
44.9 °C	43 °C	34.2 °C

Maximum: 45.4 °C
Average: 40.9 °C


33 °C	34.3 °C	43.6 °C
32.5 °C	34.4 °C	45.5 °C
33.4 °C	39.6 °C	46.4 °C

Maximum: 46.4 °C
Average: 38.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 29.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Sony Xperia L1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor 6X audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.02 / 0.37 Watt
Idle	0.89 / 2.05 / 2.18 Watt
Load	6.02 / 6.94 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Sony Xperia L1 2620 mAh	LG K10 2017 2800 mAh	Honor 6X 3340 mAh	Huawei P8 lite 2017 3000 mAh
Power Consumption		30%	18%	-13%
Idle Minimum *	0.89	0.76 15%	0.82 8%	1.44 -62%
Idle Average *	2.05	1.59 22%	2 2%	2.47 -20%
Idle Maximum *	2.18	1.61 26%	2.03 7%	2.58 -18%
Load Average *	6.02	3.24 46%	3.34 45%	4.55 24%
Load Maximum *	6.94	4.15 40%	4.92 29%	6.3 9%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		23h 18min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 27min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 56min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 43min

	Sony Xperia L1 2620 mAh	LG K10 2017 2800 mAh	Honor 6X 3340 mAh	Huawei P8 lite 2017 3000 mAh	HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle 2700 mAh
Battery Runtime		7%	58%	7%	2%
Reader / Idle	1398	1477 6%	2250 61%	1326 -5%	1485 6%
H.264	656	613 -7%	885 35%	644 -2%	622 -5%
WiFi v1.3	567	532 -6%	957 69%	604 7%	574 1%
Load	223	298 34%	375 68%	283 27%	234 5%

Pros

+ 优秀的外观设计

+ NFC，USB OTG，USB C

+ 广泛和数量众多的最新软件

+ 快速Wi-Fi

+ 精确的GPS

+ 握感好

+ 相当明亮的显示屏，色彩准确性好

+ 日常生活下，良好的电池运行时间

Cons

- 压敏外壳

- 粗糙的表面，需要习惯

- 很多预装软件

- 平庸的麦克风质量

- 相机拍摄的图像平庸

- 显示屏具有较高的黑色值

- 性能比较低

- 最高温度高

- 负载高耗能

Review: Sony Xperia L1. Test unit provided by notebookcheck.de

索尼Xperia L1是一款中低档的智能手机，在大多数领域都表现出色。如果您不期待您的智能手机比做日常操作和偶尔拍摄照片还多的活动，您将对此设备非常满意。虽然说，有些人可能会抱怨系统中的预装软件，还有负载下的可能会令人烦恼的高温。索尼Xperia L1在几个方面非常有说服力：精确的GPS模块，大量最新的软件，良好的输入设备和颜色精度良好的显示器。

屏幕，相机和电池续航时间都满足了我们对Xperia L1价格的预期。该机靠其精美的外观和精确的GPS模块而脱颖而出。如果您只想要一个运作良好的智能手机，您将对Xperia L1感到非常满意。

如果你希望你的智能手机拥有高分辨率屏幕、更多的内存、以及一个更好的屏幕，你可以选择稍微贵点的荣耀 6X 。但是，如果你想获得一个可靠的而且价格不错的手机Xperia L1 可能会是你的选择。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Sony Xperia L1 - 2017-07-27 07/27/2017 v6^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Chassis

81%

Keyboard

65 / 75 → 87%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

36 / 60 → 60%

Weight

90%

Battery

92%

Display

85%

Games Performance

11 / 63 → 18%

Application Performance

36 / 70 → 52%

Temperature

84%

Noise

100%

Audio

51 / 91 → 56%

Camera

59%

Average

68%

79%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 索尼 Xperia L1 智能手机简短评测

Florian Wimmer, 2017-08-25 (Update: 2017-08-25)

索尼 Xperia L1 智能手机简短评测

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Sony Xperia L1 audio analysis

Honor 6X audio analysis

Pros

Cons

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare