Notebookcheck

索尼 Xperia X Compact 智能手机简短评测

紧凑坚固但不再高端。 索尼今年也继续推出了旗舰机型的Compact版。不过,这台尺寸较小的设备这次搭载了较慢的硬件。我们的评测将会告诉你这个改变是否会带来问题。
Andreas Osthoff, Manuel Masiero (translated by Yuchen Wang), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Sony Xperia X Compact (Xperia Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 6 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53
Graphics adapter
Memory
3072 MB 
Display
4.60 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 319 PPI, 电容式,10点触控, IPS, TRILUMINOS 移动版屏幕, X-Reality, Dynamic Contrast, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 20 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD 最大支持 256 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 指纹感应器,加速感应器,陀螺仪,近距感应器,气压计,指南针,色谱计, DLNA, Miracast, Wi-Fi Direct, App2SD, 头部辐射值: 1.08 W/kg, 身体辐射值: 1.25 W/kg
Networking
802.11a/ac/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (800, 850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (频段 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41), HSUPA 最高 5.76 Mbps, HSDPA 最高 42.2 Mbps, LTE Cat 6 最高 300 Mbps 下载, 50 Mbps 上传, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.5 x 129 x 65
Battery
2700 mAh Lithium-Ion, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 44 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 47 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 750 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 710 h
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 23 MPix (预判对焦, Exmor-R 传感器 1/2.3", 22 毫米广角镜头, 视频拍摄: 1080p60)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (f/2.4, Exmor-R 传感器 1/5", 25 毫米广角镜头)
Additional features
Speakers: 前置立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, Keyboard Light: yes, 7.5瓦电源适配器,USB数据线,耳机,快速开始说明,服务信息, Xperia应用, 谷歌应用, AVG Protection, SwiftKey, PlayStation, 24 Months Warranty, USB-C接口, fanless
Weight
135 g, Power Supply: 54 g
Price
449 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

152.7 mm 74.7 mm 7.35 mm 161 g145.5 mm 71 mm 7.45 mm 153 g143 mm 69 mm 7.7 mm 152 g138.3 mm 67.1 mm 7.1 mm 143 g129 mm 65 mm 9.5 mm 135 g127 mm 65 mm 8.9 mm 138 g123.8 mm 58.6 mm 7.6 mm 113 g
Top: 3.5 mm headphones
Top: 3.5 mm headphones
Right: Camera button, volume rocker, standby/fingerprint scanner
Right: Camera button, volume rocker, standby/fingerprint scanner
Left: Combined slot for Nano-SIM and microSD
Left: Combined slot for Nano-SIM and microSD
Bottom: USB 2.0 Type-C
Bottom: USB 2.0 Type-C
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
323 MBit/s ∼100% +51%
Sony Xperia X Compact
802.11a/ac/b/g/n
214 MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia X Compact
802.11a/ac/b/g/n
327 MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus 3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
320 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Sony Xperia X Compact: Overview
Sony Xperia X Compact: Overview
Sony Xperia X Compact: Crossing
Sony Xperia X Compact: Crossing
Sony Xperia X Compact: Turning point
Sony Xperia X Compact: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9701 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

516
cd/m²
575
cd/m²
587
cd/m²
566
cd/m²
579
cd/m²
558
cd/m²
566
cd/m²
570
cd/m²
552
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 587 cd/m² Average: 563.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5.04 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 579 cd/m²
Contrast: 1448:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8Gamma: 2.24
Sony Xperia X Compact
IPS, 1280x720, 4.60
Honor 8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
IPS, 1280x720, 4.60
Apple iPhone SE
IPS, 1136x640, 4.00
Apple iPhone 6S
IPS, 1334x750, 4.70
Sony Xperia X
LCD, 1920x1080, 5.00
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50
Screen
-5%
-16%
6%
11%
-33%
3%
Brightness middle
579
451
-22%
547
-6%
603
4%
552
-5%
404
-30%
419
-28%
Brightness
563
443
-21%
532
-6%
579
3%
549
-2%
392
-30%
431
-23%
Brightness Distribution
88
93
6%
94
7%
93
6%
87
-1%
91
3%
84
-5%
Black Level *
0.4
0.4
-0%
0.54
-35%
0.88
-120%
0.39
2%
0.68
-70%
Contrast
1448
1128
-22%
1013
-30%
685
-53%
1415
-2%
594
-59%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.1
5.4
11%
7.37
-21%
1.8
70%
3.4
44%
7.1
-16%
4.1
33%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.5
9.9
6%
3.5
67%
13.2
-26%
12
-14%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7
6.7
4%
8.39
-20%
2.3
67%
4.16
41%
9.7
-39%
3.3
53%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.33 94%
2.28 96%
2.21 100%
2.21 100%
2.23 99%
2.1 105%
CCT
8395 77%
8262 79%
9074 72%
6955 93%
7288 89%
9502 68%
6550 99%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.9865
96.74
95.93
100
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62.13
62.18
89.38

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.3 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
142090 Points ∼48% +86%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
126969 Points ∼43% +67%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
94671 Points ∼32% +24%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
77650 Points ∼26% +2%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
76216 Points ∼26%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
2539 Points ∼52% +67%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
2533 Points ∼52% +67%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2398 Points ∼49% +58%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1518 Points ∼31%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1484 Points ∼30% -2%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
5645 Points ∼9% +45%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
4422 Points ∼7% +14%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
4386 Points ∼7% +13%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
3885 Points ∼6%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
3853 Points ∼6% -1%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1754 Points ∼27% +26%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1726 Points ∼27% +24%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1388 Points ∼21%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
5481 Points ∼13% +64%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
4097 Points ∼10% +23%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
3343 Points ∼8%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
30241 Points ∼11% +58%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
29538 Points ∼10% +54%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
28419 Points ∼10% +49%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
26420 Points ∼9% +38%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
20235 Points ∼7% +6%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
19128 Points ∼7%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
17404 Points ∼6% -9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
44059 Points ∼7% +106%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
42686 Points ∼7% +100%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
37319 Points ∼6% +75%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
34023 Points ∼5% +59%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
22157 Points ∼3% +4%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
21349 Points ∼3%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
21087 Points ∼3% -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
21771 Points ∼23% +55%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
15531 Points ∼16% +11%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
14023 Points ∼15%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
13717 Points ∼14% -2%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
13097 Points ∼14% -7%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
13065 Points ∼14% -7%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
10801 Points ∼11% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
3424 Points ∼30% +150%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
3149 Points ∼28% +130%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
1878 Points ∼17% +37%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1372 Points ∼12%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1313 Points ∼12% -4%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1273 Points ∼11% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
4633 Points ∼28% +252%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
4255 Points ∼26% +223%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
2353 Points ∼14% +79%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1318 Points ∼8%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1280 Points ∼8% -3%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1112 Points ∼7% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
2587 Points ∼48% +62%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1789 Points ∼33% +12%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
1649 Points ∼30% +3%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1601 Points ∼30%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1441 Points ∼27% -10%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
1100 Points ∼20% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
3595 Points ∼26% +151%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1434 Points ∼10%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1381 Points ∼10% -4%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1095 Points ∼8% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
4804 Points ∼11% +250%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1373 Points ∼3%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1354 Points ∼3% -1%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1066 Points ∼2% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1912 Points ∼28% +13%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1697 Points ∼25%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1486 Points ∼22% -12%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1211 Points ∼18% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2571 Points ∼13% +194%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
2298 Points ∼11% +163%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
1198 Points ∼6% +37%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
961 Points ∼5% +10%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
874 Points ∼4%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
855 Points ∼4% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2864 Points ∼25% +271%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
2524 Points ∼22% +227%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
1137 Points ∼10% +47%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
818 Points ∼7% +6%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
772 Points ∼7%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
761 Points ∼7% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
2482 Points ∼42% +53%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1892 Points ∼32% +17%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
1749 Points ∼30% +8%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1624 Points ∼28%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1504 Points ∼26% -7%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
1472 Points ∼25% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2823 Points ∼29% +191%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
971 Points ∼10%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
941 Points ∼10% -3%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
3249 Points ∼13% +275%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
867 Points ∼3%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
816 Points ∼3% -6%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
2034 Points ∼26% +21%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1935 Points ∼24% +16%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1675 Points ∼21%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
Points ∼0% -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
60 fps ∼2% +18%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
59.2 fps ∼2% +16%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
59.1 fps ∼2% +16%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
57 fps ∼2% +12%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
51 fps ∼2%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
43 fps ∼1% -16%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
33 fps ∼1% -35%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
89 fps ∼1% +187%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
80.3 fps ∼1% +159%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
79.6 fps ∼1% +157%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
56 fps ∼0% +81%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
41 fps ∼0% +32%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
31 fps ∼0%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
30 fps ∼0% -3%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
58.1 fps ∼16% +94%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
56 fps ∼15% +87%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
46 fps ∼13% +53%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
45 fps ∼12% +50%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
30 fps ∼8%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
19 fps ∼5% -37%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
15 fps ∼4% -50%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
47 fps ∼5% +213%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
40 fps ∼4% +167%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
39.5 fps ∼4% +163%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
25 fps ∼3% +67%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
19 fps ∼2% +27%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
15 fps ∼2%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
9.2 fps ∼1% -39%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
57.9 fps ∼2% +163%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
38 fps ∼1% +73%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
30 fps ∼1% +36%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
22 fps ∼1%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
11 fps ∼0% -50%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
10 fps ∼0% -55%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
31 fps ∼1% +230%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
28.1 fps ∼1% +199%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
18 fps ∼0% +91%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
10 fps ∼0% +6%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
9.4 fps ∼0%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
4.6 fps ∼0% -51%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
18 fps ∼7% +50%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
12 fps ∼5%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
6.9 fps ∼3% -42%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
5.9 fps ∼2% -51%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
18 fps ∼4% +233%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
6.3 fps ∼1% +17%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
5.4 fps ∼1%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
5.3 fps ∼1% -2%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
7101 Points ∼36% +49%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
6735 Points ∼34% +41%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
4770 Points ∼24%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
4379 Points ∼22% -8%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
4084 Points ∼20% -14%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2496 Points ∼30% +43%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
2287 Points ∼27% +31%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
2194 Points ∼26% +26%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
2034 Points ∼24% +16%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1747 Points ∼21%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
1569 Points ∼19% -10%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1450 Points ∼17% -17%
System
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
5179 Points ∼31% +67%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
3952 Points ∼24% +27%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
3537 Points ∼21% +14%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
3466 Points ∼21% +12%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
3107 Points ∼19%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
2564 Points ∼16% -17%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
2082 Points ∼13% -33%
Memory
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
2556 Points ∼28% +42%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2052 Points ∼23% +14%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1796 Points ∼20%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1408 Points ∼16% -22%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
1281 Points ∼14% -29%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
1032 Points ∼11% -43%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
963 Points ∼11% -46%
Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
4813 Points ∼17% +194%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
4323 Points ∼15% +164%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
4175 Points ∼14% +155%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
3094 Points ∼11% +89%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1703 Points ∼6% +4%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1638 Points ∼6%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1581 Points ∼5% -3%
Web
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
1226 Points ∼57% +20%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
1207 Points ∼56% +18%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1112 Points ∼51% +9%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1019 Points ∼47%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
994 Points ∼46% -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
976 Points ∼45% -4%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
774 Points ∼36% -24%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
16550 Points ∼100% +85%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
16200 Points ∼98% +81%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
10692 Points ∼65% +19%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
9155 Points ∼55% +2%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
8952 Points ∼54%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
8388 Points ∼51% -6%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
5691 Points ∼34% -36%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
4210.4 ms * ∼100% -23%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
3677 ms * ∼87% -8%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
3417 ms * ∼81%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
2979 ms * ∼71% +13%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2920.7 ms * ∼69% +15%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
1715 ms * ∼41% +50%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
1708.9 ms * ∼41% +50%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
187 Points ∼100% +72%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
186 Points ∼99% +71%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
138 Points ∼74% +27%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
122 Points ∼65% +12%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
109 Points ∼58%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
104 Points ∼56% -5%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
92 Points ∼49% -16%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
118.76 Points ∼100% +133%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
118.6 Points ∼100% +133%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
64.046 Points ∼54% +26%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
54.4 Points ∼46% +7%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
51 Points ∼43%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
50.92 Points ∼43% 0%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
49 Points ∼41% -4%

* ... smaller is better

Sony Xperia X Compact
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Honor 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Sony Xperia X
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
AndroBench 3-5
50%
-22%
-17%
135%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
27.57
23.59
-14%
12.82
-54%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
32.54
53.68
65%
17.67
-46%
Random Write 4KB
9.3
31.5
239%
7.81
-16%
10.26
10%
18.23
96%
Random Read 4KB
31.52
34.16
8%
14.15
-55%
36.28
15%
137.62
337%
Sequential Write 256KB
139.49
119.25
-15%
88.91
-36%
117.38
-16%
153.3
10%
Sequential Read 256KB
207.87
247.46
19%
248.15
19%
184.33
-11%
408.71
97%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high60 fps
Max. Load
 38.6 °C39.2 °C40.5 °C 
 37.8 °C39.8 °C41.2 °C 
 37.3 °C39 °C40.8 °C 
Maximum: 41.2 °C
Average: 39.4 °C
37.4 °C40.9 °C41.8 °C
39.5 °C41.5 °C41.8 °C
37.7 °C41.5 °C40.8 °C
Maximum: 41.8 °C
Average: 40.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  32.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.642.62525.434.93125.330.14032.940.65033.638.26331.635.48028.428.81002725.912520.825.41602225.620021.332.725020.84031521.246.340019.452.750019.560.863017.762.680017.970.2100017.871.5125017.370.2160017.467200016.770.1250017.269.9315018.269.7400017.969.3500017.669.9630017.768.7800017.868.51000017.964.11250018.164.11600018.260.9SPL3081N1.348median 17.9median 64.1Delta1.311.731.632.825.430.425.332.132.933.333.63631.630.128.427.82725.420.825.62229.121.339.620.848.321.254.219.456.819.559.117.758.117.961.117.864.417.365.817.467.416.770.317.27118.277.117.979.117.673.517.772.117.87117.966.418.157.518.253.13084.71.353.4median 17.9median 61.11.310.734.243.535.434.229.238.729.729.238.336.729.538.329.934.329.729.935.747.939.735.727.739.133.927.727.330.428.527.3312528.23129.623.32629.636.724.820.636.744.829.420.744.847.834.820.647.854.236.92154.254.43818.454.458.743.418.758.763.747.217.963.767.852.218.667.871.457.217.571.470.356.616.970.369.655.817.469.669.255.116.269.266.551.816.966.566.550.717.566.569.352.117.269.375.556.717.775.576.456.917.476.474.65517.674.667.948.817.667.957.741.717.857.754.741.417.954.783.266.329.883.25419.51.354median 66.5median 48.8median 17.8median 66.59.3101.69.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSony Xperia X CompactHonor 8Apple iPhone SE
Sony Xperia X Compact audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.95 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Honor 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone SE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.15 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.11 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.33 / 1.48 / 1.6 Watt
Load midlight 4.83 / 8.66 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Sony Xperia X Compact
 Wh, 4.60, 1280x720
Honor 8
11.4 Wh, 5.20, 1920x1080
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
 Wh, 4.60, 1280x720
Apple iPhone SE
6.21 Wh, 4.00, 1136x640
Apple iPhone 6S
7 Wh, 4.70, 1334x750
Sony Xperia X
 Wh, 5.00, 1920x1080
OnePlus 3
 Wh, 5.50, 1920x1080
Power Consumption
-32%
-18%
7%
3%
-20%
-17%
Idle Minimum *
0.33
0.78
-136%
0.6
-82%
0.54
-64%
0.5
-52%
0.56
-70%
0.57
-73%
Idle Average *
1.48
1.89
-28%
1.4
5%
1.26
15%
1.6
-8%
1.69
-14%
1.24
16%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
2.02
-26%
1.7
-6%
1.4
12%
1.9
-19%
1.75
-9%
1.36
15%
Load Average *
4.83
5.28
-9%
5.3
-10%
2.45
49%
2.5
48%
6.01
-24%
5.92
-23%
Load Maximum *
8.66
5.44
37%
8.4
3%
6.46
25%
4.8
45%
7.03
19%
10.53
-22%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
47h 24min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 24min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 06min
Sony Xperia X Compact
2700 mAh,  Wh
Honor 8
3000 mAh, 11.4 Wh
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
 mAh,  Wh
Apple iPhone SE
1624 mAh, 6.21 Wh
Apple iPhone 6S
 mAh, 7 Wh
Sony Xperia X
2620 mAh,  Wh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh,  Wh
Battery Runtime
-11%
-9%
-3%
-20%
-22%
17%
Reader / Idle
2844
1487
-48%
2249
-21%
1274
-55%
1510
-47%
1240
-56%
1338
-53%
H.264
624
526
-16%
525
-16%
759
22%
699
12%
518
-17%
847
36%
WiFi v1.3
601
499
-17%
440
-27%
673
12%
492
-18%
434
-28%
840
40%
Load
186
255
37%
242
30%
207
11%
137
-26%
213
15%
268
44%

Pros

+ 非常优秀的机身品质
+ 优秀的性能
+ 实际使用电池续航长
+ USB-C接口
+ 不错的扬声器
+ 优秀的相机
+ 明亮的屏幕
+ 支持microSD卡拓展

Cons

- 敏感的镜面材质
- 相比较厚的机身
- 仅支持USB 2.0
- 相比前代机型在一些情况下响应更慢
- 无防水防尘功能
- 不支持4K视频拍摄
In review: Sony Xperia X Compact. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.
In review: Sony Xperia X Compact. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

在对新Xperia X Compact的测试之后,我们感到有些失望,市场上再没有小尺寸高端安卓智能手机了。如果你需要更高速的硬件,就不得不考虑选择尺寸更大的设备,或者看看Apple的产品。

不过,如果你可以接受这个变化,这台最新索尼设备也是一台非常优秀的主流智能手机,它的售价相比前代机型Xperia Z5 Compact也有所下降。是的,它的性能在一些情况下有所降低,不过在实际使用中和游戏中很难察觉,这也源自分辨率较低的屏幕。另外一个缺点是它不再提供三防功能,同时镜面的塑料材质也很容易刮伤,不一定会被所有人喜欢。我们很喜欢的一点是它很长的电池续航时间。

不再高端:索尼Xperia X Compact现在只是一台主流设备。不过,这台小巧的智能手机没有任何弱点,它的性能也完全可以满足实际使用的需要,不过在这个价位上竞争也十分激烈。

它的定价为449欧元(约3343人民币),Xperia X Compact的强劲对手包括小旗舰Honor 8OnePlus 3。这两款设备速度都更快,同时配备了更大尺寸的屏幕;除此之外它们十分接近。前代机型Xperia Z5 Compact仍然在售,它支持4K视频拍摄和三防功能。如果你需要一台小巧而不乏动力的设备,从现在开始就只能选择Apple iPhone SE了。

 

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Sony Xperia X Compact - 10/21/2016 v5.1(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
68 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
46 / 60 → 77%
Weight
94%
Battery
92%
Display
85%
Games Performance
45 / 63 → 71%
Application Performance
55 / 70 → 78%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
72 / 91 → 79%
Camera
73%
Average
76%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Andreas Osthoff
Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1262 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 索尼 Xperia X Compact 智能手机简短评测
Andreas Osthoff, 2016-10-28 (Update: 2016-10-29)