Notebookcheck

LG K8 (2017) 智能手机简短评测

Florian Wimmer (translated by Delta Zhang), 05/14/2017
Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

小兄弟。 2017年的LG K8 比起LG K10更加实惠,更小,性能更弱。但他对于那些购买廉价手机的人来说可能是更好的选择?我们将会在我们的测试中找出答案。

LG K8 2017 (K Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 1.4 GHz
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 308
Memory
1536 MB 
Display
5 inch 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 294 PPI, 电容触摸屏, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 8.81 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm 音频复合接口, Card Reader: 最大32GB microSD 存储卡, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计, 距离传感器, USB-OTG, Wi-Fi Direct
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1900/​2100), UMTS (850/​900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B7/​B8/​B20); bandwidth (Download/​Upload): 150Mbps/​50Mbps; SAR value: 0.433 W/Kg (head), 1.220 W/kg (body), LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 144.8 x 72.1
Battery
9.6 Wh, 2500 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 20 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 18 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 410 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 490 h
Operating System
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.2, 相位自动对焦, LED 闪光灯, 录像@1080p/​30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.4, 录像@1080p
Additional features
Speakers: 后置扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, 充电器, USB 线缆, LG Backup, LG SmartWorld, RemoteCall Service, 24 Months Warranty, FM 收音机, fanless
Weight
142 g, Power Supply: 48 g
Price
159 Euro

 

LG K8 (2017) Smartphone
LG K8 (2017) Smartphone
LG K8 (2017) Smartphone
LG K8 (2017) Smartphone
LG K8 (2017) Smartphone
LG K8 (2017) Smartphone
LG K8 (2017) Smartphone
LG K8 (2017) Smartphone
LG K8 (2017) Smartphone
LG K8 (2017) Smartphone

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
99.7 MBit/s ∼100% +84%
LG K8 2017
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.1 MBit/s ∼54%
Lenovo K6
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.9 MBit/s ∼52% -4%
LG K10 2017
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.2 MBit/s ∼46% -15%
Gigaset GS160
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
33.5 MBit/s ∼34% -38%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
106 MBit/s ∼100% +115%
LG K10 2017
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.6 MBit/s ∼52% +11%
Lenovo K6
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.4 MBit/s ∼49% +7%
LG K8 2017
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.2 MBit/s ∼46%
Gigaset GS160
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.2 MBit/s ∼45% -2%
GPS Garmin Edge 500: overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500: crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500: bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500: bridge
GPS LG K8 (2017): overview
GPS LG K8 (2017): overview
GPS LG K8 (2017): crossroads
GPS LG K8 (2017): crossroads
GPS LG K8 (2017): bridge
GPS LG K8 (2017): bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
361
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
334
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 361 cd/m² Average: 350.8 cd/m² Minimum: 4.13 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 358 cd/m²
Contrast: 731:1 (Black: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.12
LG K8 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5
LG K10 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3
Huawei Y6 II Compact
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Gigaset GS160
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Lenovo K6
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
Screen
15%
-7%
20%
-1%
26%
Brightness
351
350
0%
487
39%
452
29%
479
36%
461
31%
Brightness Distribution
93
85
-9%
92
-1%
84
-10%
95
2%
88
-5%
Black Level *
0.49
0.36
27%
0.9
-84%
0.42
14%
0.55
-12%
0.38
22%
Contrast
731
1067
46%
546
-25%
1093
50%
889
22%
1237
69%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7.1
6
15%
6.6
7%
4.5
37%
8.3
-17%
5.2
27%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.5
5.9
9%
4.9
25%
6.5
-0%
8.7
-34%
5.6
14%
Gamma
2.12 113%
2 120%
2.12 113%
2.22 108%
2.08 115%
2.24 107%
CCT
8166 80%
8042 81%
7090 92%
7791 83%
9034 72%
7924 82%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 8929 Hz25 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 8929 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 8929 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6262 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.6 ms rise
↘ 10.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.4 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
30924 Points ∼14%
LG K10 2017
39063 Points ∼17% +26%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
33786 Points ∼15% +9%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
22218 Points ∼10% -28%
Gigaset GS160
28459 Points ∼12% -8%
Lenovo K6
43673 Points ∼19% +41%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
622 Points ∼21%
LG K10 2017
1105 Points ∼37% +78%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
826 Points ∼27% +33%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
558 Points ∼19% -10%
Lenovo K6
1002 Points ∼33% +61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
31 Points ∼0%
LG K10 2017
380 Points ∼5% +1126%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
167 Points ∼2% +439%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
42 Points ∼1% +35%
Lenovo K6
491 Points ∼6% +1484%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
39 Points ∼1%
LG K10 2017
445 Points ∼9% +1041%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
203 Points ∼4% +421%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
53 Points ∼1% +36%
Lenovo K6
554 Points ∼11% +1321%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
6656 Points ∼9%
LG K10 2017
8223 Points ∼11% +24%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
9393 Points ∼13% +41%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
7429 Points ∼10% +12%
Gigaset GS160
7881 Points ∼11% +18%
Lenovo K6
9034 Points ∼13% +36%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
2546 Points ∼1%
LG K10 2017
7936 Points ∼2% +212%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
4296 Points ∼1% +69%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
3836 Points ∼1% +51%
Gigaset GS160
3291 Points ∼1% +29%
Lenovo K6
9691 Points ∼2% +281%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
2951 Points ∼1%
LG K10 2017
7998 Points ∼4% +171%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
4885 Points ∼2% +66%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
4298 Points ∼2% +46%
Gigaset GS160
3780 Points ∼2% +28%
Lenovo K6
9537 Points ∼5% +223%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
3.4 fps ∼0%
LG K10 2017
13 fps ∼1% +282%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
8.4 fps ∼1% +147%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
5.2 fps ∼0% +53%
Gigaset GS160
6 fps ∼0% +76%
Lenovo K6
16 fps ∼1% +371%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
6.4 fps ∼1%
LG K10 2017
22 fps ∼5% +244%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
15 fps ∼3% +134%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
9.4 fps ∼2% +47%
Gigaset GS160
11 fps ∼2% +72%
Lenovo K6
15 fps ∼3% +134%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
1.3 fps ∼0%
LG K10 2017
5.3 fps ∼1% +308%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2.8 fps ∼1% +115%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
1.8 fps ∼0% +38%
Gigaset GS160
2.1 fps ∼0% +62%
Lenovo K6
7.1 fps ∼1% +446%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
3.7 fps ∼1%
LG K10 2017
11 fps ∼3% +197%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
6.1 fps ∼2% +65%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
3.8 fps ∼1% +3%
Gigaset GS160
4.7 fps ∼1% +27%
Lenovo K6
7 fps ∼2% +89%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
4673 Points ∼56%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
3400 Points ∼41% -27%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
2217 Points ∼27% -53%
Gigaset GS160
2563 Points ∼31% -45%
Lenovo K6
3387 Points ∼41% -28%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
616 Points ∼40%
LG K10 2017
1137 Points ∼74% +85%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
533 Points ∼35% -13%
Gigaset GS160
9 Points ∼1% -99%
Lenovo K6
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Graphics (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
436 Points ∼5%
LG K10 2017
508 Points ∼6% +17%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
283 Points ∼3% -35%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
308 Points ∼4% -29%
Gigaset GS160
208 Points ∼2% -52%
Lenovo K6
732 Points ∼9% +68%
Memory (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
634 Points ∼14%
LG K10 2017
623 Points ∼14% -2%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
571 Points ∼13% -10%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
526 Points ∼12% -17%
Gigaset GS160
497 Points ∼11% -22%
Lenovo K6
530 Points ∼12% -16%
System (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
1191 Points ∼18%
LG K10 2017
1259 Points ∼19% +6%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
1093 Points ∼17% -8%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
887 Points ∼13% -26%
Gigaset GS160
1029 Points ∼16% -14%
Lenovo K6
1282 Points ∼19% +8%
Overall (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
371 Points ∼10%
LG K10 2017
821 Points ∼22% +121%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
203 Points ∼5% -45%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
526 Points ∼14% +42%
Gigaset GS160
178 Points ∼5% -52%
Lenovo K6
263 Points ∼7% -29%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
1203 Points ∼14%
LG K10 2017
1480 Points ∼17% +23%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
1737 Points ∼9%
LG K10 2017
2311 Points ∼13% +33%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
642 Points ∼13%
LG K10 2017
593 Points ∼12% -8%

Legend

 
LG K8 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425, Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K10 2017 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 II Compact Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS160 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo K6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
10742 ms * ∼18%
LG K10 2017
11708.2 ms * ∼20% -9%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
13234 ms * ∼22% -23%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
15895 ms * ∼27% -48%
Gigaset GS160
13907.4 ms * ∼23% -29%
Lenovo K6
10849.6 ms * ∼18% -1%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
3052 Points ∼6%
LG K10 2017
3407 Points ∼7% +12%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2805 Points ∼6% -8%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
1938 Points ∼4% -37%
Gigaset GS160
2493 Points ∼5% -18%
Lenovo K6
3438 Points ∼7% +13%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
17.124 Points ∼5%
LG K10 2017
20.838 Points ∼6% +22%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
18.304 Points ∼5% +7%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
14.105 Points ∼4% -18%
Gigaset GS160
14.428 Points ∼4% -16%
Lenovo K6
21.436 Points ∼6% +25%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
52.23 MB/s ∼60%
LG K10 2017
61.63 MB/s ∼71% +18%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
17.12 MB/s ∼20% -67%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
14.4 MB/s ∼17% -72%
Gigaset GS160
19.19 MB/s ∼22% -63%
Lenovo K6
50.4 MB/s ∼58% -4%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
78.55 MB/s ∼81%
LG K10 2017
77.4 MB/s ∼80% -1%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
31.57 MB/s ∼33% -60%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
17.7 MB/s ∼18% -77%
Gigaset GS160
30.71 MB/s ∼32% -61%
Lenovo K6
78.2 MB/s ∼81% 0%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
12.5 MB/s ∼8%
LG K10 2017
10.8 MB/s ∼7% -14%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
15.5 MB/s ∼10% +24%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
6.9 MB/s ∼5% -45%
Gigaset GS160
6.8 MB/s ∼4% -46%
Lenovo K6
10.5 MB/s ∼7% -16%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
41.6 MB/s ∼24%
LG K10 2017
25.1 MB/s ∼15% -40%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
23 MB/s ∼13% -45%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
19.7 MB/s ∼11% -53%
Gigaset GS160
18.5 MB/s ∼11% -56%
Lenovo K6
32.01 MB/s ∼18% -23%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
84.6 MB/s ∼41%
LG K10 2017
43.6 MB/s ∼21% -48%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
75 MB/s ∼36% -11%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
42.4 MB/s ∼21% -50%
Gigaset GS160
46.6 MB/s ∼23% -45%
Lenovo K6
46.66 MB/s ∼23% -45%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
LG K8 2017
270.8 MB/s ∼34%
LG K10 2017
246.1 MB/s ∼31% -9%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
211 MB/s ∼26% -22%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
143 MB/s ∼18% -47%
Gigaset GS160
200.5 MB/s ∼25% -26%
Lenovo K6
262.56 MB/s ∼33% -3%
Max. Load
 38.4 °C36.2 °C34.9 °C 
 36.5 °C37.8 °C34.5 °C 
 34.1 °C33.3 °C33.4 °C 
Maximum: 38.4 °C
Average: 35.5 °C
29 °C28.7 °C37.5 °C
29.5 °C29.8 °C37.1 °C
28.9 °C29.2 °C32 °C
Maximum: 37.5 °C
Average: 31.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  36.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.644.42525.4343125.335.94032.931.75033.630.96331.637.88028.424.91002726.312520.827.41602225.420021.325.625020.826.531521.229.640019.437.150019.545.263017.754.480017.965.5100017.876.6125017.378.9160017.477.7200016.774.4250017.273.4315018.272.4400017.970500017.668.5630017.768.5800017.871.91000017.969.51250018.163.81600018.255.9SPL3085.6N1.355median 17.9LG K8 2017median 65.5Delta1.317.432.436.931.33431.733.82632.839.434.736.231.228.627.925.424.421.324.823.325.922.530.522.437.121.340.218.444.817.551.917.555.617.261.116.867.517.368.817.46516.673.617.375.517.676.117.679.217.779.517.475.717.77117.967.318.161.518.142.929.886.41.356.8median 17.7Huawei Y6 II Compactmedian 61.51.616.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
LG K8 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.59 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei Y6 II Compact audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.37 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 13.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.65 / 1.6 / 1.62 Watt
Load midlight 2.97 / 4.34 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
LG K8 2017
2500 mAh
LG K10 2017
2800 mAh
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2200 mAh
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
2600 mAh
Gigaset GS160
2500 mAh
Lenovo K6
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-4%
-2%
-16%
-11%
-11%
Idle Minimum *
0.65
0.76
-17%
0.57
12%
0.92
-42%
0.56
14%
0.65
-0%
Idle Average *
1.6
1.59
1%
1.53
4%
1.76
-10%
1.7
-6%
1.65
-3%
Idle Maximum *
1.62
1.61
1%
1.6
1%
1.85
-14%
1.75
-8%
1.67
-3%
Load Average *
2.97
3.24
-9%
2.82
5%
3.47
-17%
4.17
-40%
3.58
-21%
Load Maximum *
4.34
4.15
4%
5.69
-31%
4.22
3%
5.07
-17%
5.58
-29%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
WiFi Surfing v1.3
9h 54min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 40min
LG K8 2017
2500 mAh
LG K10 2017
2800 mAh
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2200 mAh
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
2600 mAh
Gigaset GS160
2500 mAh
Lenovo K6
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-2%
-8%
-3%
-5%
23%
Reader / Idle
1477
1175
1224
1326
1626
WiFi v1.3
594
532
-10%
623
5%
572
-4%
615
4%
715
20%
Load
280
298
6%
222
-21%
277
-1%
244
-13%
350
25%
H.264
613
682
617
702
633

Pros

+ 外壳设计质量出色
+ 续航时间长且电池可更换
+ 低功耗
+ 支持NFC,USB-OTG
+ 最新Android 7
+ 通话质量出色
+ 合理的相机
+ 出色的控制
+ 高速存储

Cons

- 压力敏感
- 图形处理能力弱
- 长期负载下降频
- 自动对焦有问题
- 屏幕亮度不足
In the test: LG K8 (2017). Test unit provided by LG Germany.
In the test: LG K8 (2017). Test unit provided by LG Germany.

如同先前的LG K10(2017),这家韩国厂商将LG K8(2017)打造成了一部提供了许多在这个价位的设备难以见到的特性的,有着不错品质的低端手机。首先,有着支持NFC以及当今蓝牙标准的硬件。但是,对于指纹识别的配备,你可能要失望了。作为替代,这台设备有着良好的通话质量以及相机,这对于这个价位的手机来说恰到好处。精准的输入设备,可更换的电池加上不错的续航都是这LG K8(2017)的优点,外壳也显得做工优秀。

你需要经常手工调整图像的对焦,因为对焦有一些小问题,而且屏幕上整体太暗了。扬声器表现在于同价位的平均水平之下,且这个水平本身就很低,且偏弱的图形性能很难对未来做出承诺。

有着看上去高品质的外壳,不错的相机,可更换的电池--对于那些不会被指纹识别的缺失以及较暗的屏幕吓跑的人们来说,这台这台LG K8(2017)是不错的选择。

任何人都可以接受得到一台质量过硬,而且看上去拥有高质量且与目前价格与屏幕以及成像质量没有什么改进,但是却拥有更加强劲的性能的 LG K10相比便宜将近五十欧元的廉价手机。只要这个巨大的价格差保持下去,并且你并不是很需要那些额外的性能的话, 现在的LG K8 (2017)对你来说,无疑是一个好选择。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

LG K8 2017 - 04/19/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
84%
Connectivity
37 / 60 → 61%
Weight
93%
Battery
92%
Display
82%
Games Performance
3 / 63 → 5%
Application Performance
37 / 70 → 52%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 61%
Camera
67%
Average
68%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > LG K8 (2017) 智能手机简短评测
Florian Wimmer, 2017-05-14 (Update: 2017-05-14)