Notebookcheck Logo

Vernee Mars 智能手机简短评测

无边框。 中国厂商Vernee带来这款价格实惠的中端手机Mars,带有无边框设计,而且在该价位上有着出色的配置。根据厂商的说法,其屏幕侧边框宽度仅为1毫米。在评测中将会看到它与其他强力的竞争对手的对比。
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
Vernee Mars (Mars Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memory
4 GB 
Display
5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, 电容多点触控屏, LCD, IPS, 2.5D弧形屏幕, 康宁大猩猩玻璃3代, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 25.1 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5-mm 立体声接口, Card Reader: 最大 128 GB micro-SD 储存卡, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 距离传感器, 加速度计, 罗盘, 陀螺仪, OTG, Miracast, USB Type-C, App2SD, LED状态灯
Networking
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G: GSM 850/900/1800MHz 3G: WCDMA 900/2100MHz 4G: FDD-LTE 800/1800/2100/2600MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.6 x 151 x 73
Battery
3000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 单扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 模块化电源适配器, USB 线缆, 木制支架, Vernee UI, 12 Months Warranty, SAR 结果未知, fanless
Weight
162 g, Power Supply: 45 g
Price
190 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

154.3 mm 77.4 mm 9.8 mm 175 g154.5 mm 76.5 mm 7.85 mm 143 g150.8 mm 75 mm 8.5 mm 199 g151 mm 73 mm 7.6 mm 162 g147.1 mm 73.8 mm 8.3 mm 156 g144.4 mm 72 mm 9.9 mm 137 g143.8 mm 70.2 mm 8.3 mm 135 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader
maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate
average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Vernee Mars
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
81.1 MBit/s
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.8 MBit/s -39%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.6 MBit/s -41%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.6 MBit/s -44%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
58.3 MBit/s +50%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50 MBit/s +29%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.7 MBit/s +20%
Vernee Mars
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
38.9 MBit/s
GPS test Vernee Mars
GPS test Vernee Mars
GPS test Vernee Mars
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
13 MP camera, HDR mode
13 MP camera
13 MP camera, HDR mode

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
313
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
367
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LCD tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 367 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 338.9 cd/m² Minimum: 14.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 345 cd/m²
Contrast: 2464:1 (Black: 0.14 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.47
Vernee Mars
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
UMI Max
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Honor 5C
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20
Coolpad Modena 2
IPS, 1280x720, 5.50
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.50
Huawei Mate 9
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.90
Screen
-20%
-15%
1%
-23%
-41%
-23%
10%
Brightness middle
345
412
19%
312
-10%
522
51%
515
49%
482
40%
414
20%
696
102%
Brightness
339
414
22%
302
-11%
498
47%
498
47%
468
38%
420
24%
680
101%
Brightness Distribution
85
94
11%
79
-7%
86
1%
93
9%
86
1%
94
11%
93
9%
Black Level *
0.14
0.42
-200%
0.15
-7%
0.23
-64%
0.49
-250%
0.63
-350%
0.33
-136%
0.42
-200%
Contrast
2464
981
-60%
2080
-16%
2270
-8%
1051
-57%
765
-69%
1255
-49%
1657
-33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.1
5.6
21%
8.2
-15%
6.9
3%
6.2
13%
6.5
8%
8.1
-14%
4.3
39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
13.9
9.7
30%
16.5
-19%
12.3
12%
11.4
18%
12.4
11%
13.8
1%
9.4
32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.7
6.9
-3%
9.2
-37%
9.2
-37%
7.4
-10%
7.3
-9%
9.6
-43%
4.8
28%
Gamma
2.47 89%
2.4 92%
2.29 96%
2.38 92%
2.28 96%
1.91 115%
2 110%
2.33 94%
CCT
7711 84%
8422 77%
9017 72%
8687 75%
8664 75%
7249 90%
7754 84%
7255 90%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 41 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18062 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
24 MB/s
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
51.1 MB/s +113%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
12.62 MB/s -47%
UMI Max
18.07 MB/s -25%
Honor 5C
24.21 MB/s +1%
Coolpad Modena 2
18.25 MB/s -24%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
16.17 MB/s -33%
Huawei Mate 9
29.53 MB/s +23%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
44.5 MB/s
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
65.5 MB/s +47%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
22.77 MB/s -49%
UMI Max
36.64 MB/s -18%
Honor 5C
51.9 MB/s +17%
Coolpad Modena 2
35.59 MB/s -20%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
27.68 MB/s -38%
Huawei Mate 9
54 MB/s +21%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
15.77 MB/s
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28.31 MB/s +80%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.26 MB/s -48%
UMI Max
10.91 MB/s -31%
Honor 5C
15.7 MB/s 0%
Coolpad Modena 2
6.79 MB/s -57%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
7.95 MB/s -50%
Huawei Mate 9
8.77 MB/s -44%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
21.66 MB/s
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.9 MB/s -17%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
18.24 MB/s -16%
UMI Max
26.66 MB/s +23%
Honor 5C
61.7 MB/s +185%
Coolpad Modena 2
23.03 MB/s +6%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
20.25 MB/s -7%
Huawei Mate 9
94.7 MB/s +337%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
71.6 MB/s
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
43.95 MB/s -39%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
70.3 MB/s -2%
UMI Max
69.5 MB/s -3%
Honor 5C
75.5 MB/s +5%
Coolpad Modena 2
42.56 MB/s -41%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
39.51 MB/s -45%
Huawei Mate 9
142.9 MB/s +100%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
255.9 MB/s
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
144.1 MB/s -44%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
187.3 MB/s -27%
UMI Max
257.9 MB/s +1%
Honor 5C
263 MB/s +3%
Coolpad Modena 2
147 MB/s -43%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
178.6 MB/s -30%
Huawei Mate 9
594 MB/s +132%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
51008 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28399 Points -44%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
23822 Points -53%
UMI Max
49057 Points -4%
Honor 5C
53143 Points +4%
Coolpad Modena 2
24875 Points -51%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
30676 Points -40%
Huawei Mate 9
124087 Points +143%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
404 Points
Honor 5C
906 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1147 Points
Honor 5C
3914 Points
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
2903 Points
UMI Max
2701 Points -7%
Coolpad Modena 2
1274 Points -56%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1588 Points -45%
Huawei Mate 9
5629 Points +94%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
729 Points
UMI Max
734 Points +1%
Coolpad Modena 2
459 Points -37%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
572 Points -22%
Huawei Mate 9
1947 Points +167%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
10702 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4432 Points -59%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3070 Points -71%
UMI Max
10942 Points +2%
Honor 5C
11755 Points +10%
Coolpad Modena 2
3222 Points -70%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4944 Points -54%
Huawei Mate 9
27364 Points +156%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
10685 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
3858 Points -64%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2645 Points -75%
UMI Max
10612 Points -1%
Honor 5C
11319 Points +6%
Coolpad Modena 2
2789 Points -74%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4333 Points -59%
Huawei Mate 9
35626 Points +233%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
10762 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9256 Points -14%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
7026 Points -35%
UMI Max
12239 Points +14%
Honor 5C
13588 Points +26%
Coolpad Modena 2
7061 Points -34%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
9768 Points -9%
Huawei Mate 9
15104 Points +40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
602 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
53 Points -91%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
124 Points -79%
UMI Max
598 Points -1%
Honor 5C
563 Points -6%
Coolpad Modena 2
130 Points -78%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
209 Points -65%
Huawei Mate 9
2367 Points +293%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
523 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
42 Points -92%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
101 Points -81%
UMI Max
521 Points 0%
Honor 5C
480 Points -8%
Coolpad Modena 2
106 Points -80%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
172 Points -67%
Huawei Mate 9
2448 Points +368%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
1100 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
716 Points -35%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
618 Points -44%
UMI Max
1239 Points +13%
Honor 5C
1418 Points +29%
Coolpad Modena 2
621 Points -44%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
831 Points -24%
Huawei Mate 9
2123 Points +93%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
18 fps
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9.6 fps -47%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.2 fps -54%
UMI Max
17 fps -6%
Honor 5C
20 fps +11%
Coolpad Modena 2
8.9 fps -51%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
8.4 fps -53%
Huawei Mate 9
60 fps +233%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
17 fps
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
5.2 fps -69%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
4.9 fps -71%
UMI Max
17 fps 0%
Honor 5C
19 fps +12%
Coolpad Modena 2
5 fps -71%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
14 fps -18%
Huawei Mate 9
80 fps +371%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
7.6 fps
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4.1 fps -46%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.8 fps -76%
UMI Max
7.1 fps -7%
Honor 5C
8.4 fps +11%
Coolpad Modena 2
4 fps -47%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
3 fps -61%
Huawei Mate 9
37 fps +387%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
7.1 fps
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1.8 fps -75%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3.4 fps -52%
UMI Max
7.1 fps 0%
Honor 5C
7.9 fps +11%
Coolpad Modena 2
1.8 fps -75%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
6 fps -15%
Huawei Mate 9
34 fps +379%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
5.1 fps
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.2 fps -76%
UMI Max
4.7 fps -8%
Honor 5C
4.9 fps -4%
Coolpad Modena 2
1.2 fps -76%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1.9 fps -63%
Huawei Mate 9
28 fps +449%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
4.8 fps
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2.5 fps -48%
UMI Max
4.7 fps -2%
Honor 5C
4.5 fps -6%
Coolpad Modena 2
2.9 fps -40%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4.4 fps -8%
Huawei Mate 9
24 fps +400%
GFXBench
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
2.5 fps
UMI Max
2.5 fps 0%
Honor 5C
2.9 fps +16%
Huawei Mate 9
fps -100%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
2.7 fps
UMI Max
2.5 fps -7%
Honor 5C
2.8 fps +4%
Huawei Mate 9
14 fps +419%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
4554 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4283 Points -6%
UMI Max
4485 Points -2%
Honor 5C
5120 Points +12%
Coolpad Modena 2
3119 Points -32%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
3813 Points -16%
Huawei Mate 9
7403 Points +63%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
348 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
603 Points +73%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
448 Points +29%
UMI Max
341 Points -2%
Honor 5C
1225 Points +252%
Coolpad Modena 2
483 Points +39%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
192 Points -45%
Huawei Mate 9
2772 Points +697%
System (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
2291 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1035 Points -55%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
801 Points -65%
UMI Max
2123 Points -7%
Honor 5C
2600 Points +13%
Coolpad Modena 2
909 Points -60%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1090 Points -52%
Huawei Mate 9
3616 Points +58%
Memory (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
1005 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
741 Points -26%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
487 Points -52%
UMI Max
998 Points -1%
Honor 5C
1504 Points +50%
Coolpad Modena 2
598 Points -40%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
450 Points -55%
Huawei Mate 9
3850 Points +283%
Graphics (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
665 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
313 Points -53%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
174 Points -74%
UMI Max
666 Points 0%
Honor 5C
814 Points +22%
Coolpad Modena 2
178 Points -73%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
286 Points -57%
Huawei Mate 9
3939 Points +492%
Web (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
10 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
551 Points +5410%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
592 Points +5820%
UMI Max
10 Points 0%
Honor 5C
707 Points +6970%
Coolpad Modena 2
565 Points +5550%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
10 Points 0%
Huawei Mate 9
1076 Points +10660%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
4073 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2773 Points -32%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1910 Points -53%
UMI Max
4231 Points +4%
Honor 5C
4188 Points +3%
Coolpad Modena 2
1975 Points -52%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
2697 Points -34%
Huawei Mate 9
11897 Points +192%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
9376 ms *
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
12953 ms * -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
19234 ms * -105%
UMI Max
9796 ms * -4%
Honor 5C
9111 ms * +3%
Coolpad Modena 2
19647 ms * -110%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
12910 ms * -38%
Huawei Mate 9
2734 ms * +71%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Vernee Mars
27.1 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.09 Points -37%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
12.73 Points -53%
UMI Max
25.5 Points -6%
Honor 5C
27.93 Points +3%
Coolpad Modena 2
13.15 Points -51%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
18.03 Points -33%
Huawei Mate 9
68.6 Points +153%

Legend

 
Vernee Mars Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G4 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V7 Lite Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Max Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Coolpad Modena 2 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Zest Plus Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 34.7 °C32 °C34.5 °C 
 35.7 °C32.9 °C37.2 °C 
 34.1 °C32.7 °C35.6 °C 
Maximum: 37.2 °C
Average: 34.4 °C
34.5 °C34.8 °C35.5 °C
34.5 °C35.5 °C36.3 °C
33.6 °C35.2 °C36.3 °C
Maximum: 36.3 °C
Average: 35.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  38.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2024.42924.42525.328.325.33125.826.125.84029.732.729.75029.531.529.56324.525.224.5802523.12510026.523.226.512536.631.436.616022.819.422.820024.320.424.325028.520.928.531536.923.636.940044.323.844.350050.920.850.963057.516.857.580063.517.563.5100069.219.769.2125069.118.969.1160068.516.368.5200067.916.167.9250069.414.769.4315071.615.371.6400075.114.975.1500070.614.270.6630064.213.764.2800060.913.660.91000058.713.658.71250058.313.958.3160004613.646SPL81.229.381.2N43.81.243.8median 58.7median 16.8median 58.7Delta14.13.414.136.331.432.436.334.429.331.334.431.632.231.731.635.134.12635.138.134.939.438.13132.536.23126.427.228.626.427.527.725.427.527.531.121.327.526.827.523.326.830.627.122.530.638.429.922.438.446.432.921.346.45240.318.45260.847.817.560.865.85517.565.870.661.817.270.67463.816.87473.96317.373.968.957.917.468.968.857.416.668.868.857.717.368.868.65717.668.668.255.217.668.268.453.817.768.469.85517.469.874.359.417.774.375.160.417.975.169.954.818.169.966.35118.166.382.670.729.882.653.425.61.353.4median 68.4median 55median 17.7median 68.49.910.41.79.932.537.232.432.532.733.631.332.723.531.231.723.530.833.52630.841.139.139.441.132.933.436.232.928.930.728.628.926.425.825.426.427.324.821.327.328.325.823.328.332.62422.532.638.624.722.438.646.432.421.346.454.537.518.454.55942.917.55959.549.517.559.562.750.117.262.766.952.516.866.971.155.517.371.175.358.217.475.379.162.916.679.180.463.817.380.479.162.217.679.177.660.117.677.675.357.417.775.374.657.417.474.674.356.517.774.372.354.517.972.364.145.818.164.146.227.918.146.287.971.229.887.964.123.81.364.1median 64.1median 50.1median 17.7median 64.114.313.61.714.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseVernee MarsZTE Blade V7 LiteHonor 5C
Vernee Mars audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

ZTE Blade V7 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor 5C audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.14 / 0.31 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.02 / 1.69 / 1.82 Watt
Load midlight 4.39 / 6.79 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Vernee Mars
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
UMI Max
4000 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
Coolpad Modena 2
2500 mAh
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
5000 mAh
Power Consumption
23%
30%
22%
4%
3%
7%
Idle Minimum *
1.02
0.68
33%
0.63
38%
1.02
-0%
0.89
13%
0.64
37%
0.83
19%
Idle Average *
1.69
1.58
7%
1.37
19%
1.53
9%
2.07
-22%
1.96
-16%
2.06
-22%
Idle Maximum *
1.82
1.61
12%
1.71
6%
1.62
11%
2.15
-18%
1.98
-9%
2.08
-14%
Load Average *
4.39
3.36
23%
2.82
36%
2.91
34%
3.46
21%
4.99
-14%
3.53
20%
Load Maximum *
6.79
3.91
42%
3.36
51%
2.93
57%
5.18
24%
5.48
19%
4.49
34%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
7h 07min
Vernee Mars
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
UMI Max
4000 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
Coolpad Modena 2
2500 mAh
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
427
630
48%
517
21%
588
38%
584
37%
518
21%
815
91%

Pros

+ 高对比度IPS屏幕
+ 出色系统性能表现
+ 1080p分辨率
+ 外壳质量及手感
+ 双频Wi-Fi
+ USB Type-C
+ 高速eMMC存储 (在该价位上)

Cons

- 相机应该被优化
- 电池续航时间和屏幕亮度可以更好
- GPS模块
- 扬声器
In review: Vernee Mars. Review sample courtesy of Vernee.

Vernee带来的Mars是一台有着出色外观,十分晚上的智能手机。考虑到目前180~190欧元(约合190~201美金,进口)的售价,这台实惠的中端手机有着十分吸引人的性价比,一块高分辨率,高对比度的IPS屏幕,优秀的系统性能以及出色的配置。

但作为代价,在扬声器音质(相比于竞品型号)和GPS性能上必须做出让步。此外,很难用1300W像素的主相机拍出有用的相片,如果能加入光学防抖则会有很大的改善。

 Vernee Mars在中等价位上是一台很好的智能手机,但它缺少一个独特的卖点。例如有着相近配置的华为荣耀5C在德国也与它有着相似的售价。这使得我们对于它是否值得进口产生了怀疑。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Vernee Mars - 11/18/2016 v5.1(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
63 / 75 → 84%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
47 / 60 → 78%
Weight
91%
Battery
89%
Display
83%
Games Performance
25 / 63 → 40%
Application Performance
41 / 70 → 58%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Camera
66%
Average
72%
83%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Vernee Mars 智能手机简短评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2016-12- 5 (Update: 2016-12- 5)