ZTE Blade V7 Lite
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 17 scores (from 22 reviews)
Reviews for the ZTE Blade V7 Lite
Darkness favors secret dealings! ZTE's Blade V7 Lite is an affordable mid-range smartphone with very appealing looks. Compared with its Blade V7 sister model, it is cheaper and aims to attract price-conscious buyers. However, the Lite version is equipped with a somewhat weaker SoC. Furthermore, it presented its dark side in our test.
Source: Trusted Reviews
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe ZTE Blade V7 Lite is cheap, but not quite cheerful enough to justify the savings, with poor performance and a sub-par camera.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 70% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Gear Open
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionFactor in a chipset which offers thoroughly average performance levels and the Blade V7 Lite begins to look more like its £150/$225 price tag – despite the admittedly gorgeous metal bodywork, which is both svelte and comfortable to hold.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/07/2016
Source: What Mobile
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionA solid build quality and acceptable camera help this phone to stand out against similar budget handsets, but overall performance can feel slow and sluggish at times. If ZTE had included a slightly better processor, the Blade V7 Lite would’ve made a very attractive package. As it stands, this is just another good budget phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/03/2016
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Recombu
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionFor less than £10 a month on contract, the Blade V7 Lite does a good job of offering a strong set of features while keeping the cost down. You get a sturdy, attractive Android handset packed with all kinds of gesture controls, plus a solid HD display and a fingerprint sensor for extra security.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: PCtipp.ch
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: e-media - Heft 09/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: WinFuture
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Medium, Date: 07/21/2016
Source: Curved
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 82% display: 65% mobility: 78%
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 4/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Blick
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/30/2016
Source: Chinahandys.net
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 58% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 50% workmanship: 70%
Source: FAQsAndroid
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 68% price: 70% display: 65% mobility: 75% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tuexperto
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/15/2016
Source: AndroidPit.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Chimera Revo
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 69% price: 65% features: 65% mobility: 70% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Smartphone Italia
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 60% display: 70% mobility: 60% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Hitek
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 68% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: Top for Phone
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2016
Source: Teknokulis
 TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 TR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% workmanship: 75%
Source: Log.com.tr
 TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 TR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/06/2016
Source: Helpix
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 73%
Comment
ARM Mali-T720:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
MT6735:
64位四核的系统芯片(4个ARM Cortex-A53核心),主频最高1.5 GHz,面向低价平板电脑和智能手机。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.