UMi Max 智能手机简短评测

Name: UMI Max
Brand: UMI

入门级价位上提供USB Type-C接口。对于150欧元（约合160美金）的零售价格来说，中国厂商UMi在Max上提供了有趣的配置：强大的硬件，4000mAh的电池以及新一代Type-C USB接口。

Marcus Herbrich, ✓ Sven Kloevekorn (translated by Delta Zhang), Published 11/28/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of gearbest.com

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

UMI Max

Processor

Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T860 MP2

Memory

3 GB

, LPDDR3

Display

5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, 电容屏, 多点触控, Sharp, IPS, 2.5D, 康宁大猩猩玻璃3代, glossy: yes

Storage

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 三星, 10.4 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm 音频接口, Card Reader: 最高256G microSD 储存卡, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 线性加速度传感器, Glonass导航, 距离传感器, 光线传感器, 加速度计, 罗盘, 陀螺仪, 霍尔开关, Smart-Key, OTG, 状态指示LED灯, 无线显示

Networking

802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM: 850(B5)/900(B8)/1800(B3)/1900(B2) || WCDMA: 850(B5)/900(B8)/1900(B2)/2100(B1) | LTE FDD: 2100(B1)/1800(B3)/2600(B7)/800(B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 150.8 x 75

Battery

4000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 360 h

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix 松下相机, 双闪光灯
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix GalaxyCore GC5005

Additional features

Speakers: 单扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 模块化电源适配器, USB线缆, UMi UI, 12 Months Warranty, SAR n.b., fanless

Weight

199 g, Power Supply: 27 g

Price

150 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
UMI Max Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash	98.8 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
UMI Max Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash	103 MBit/s
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Moto Z Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	491 MBit/s
UMI Super Euro Edition Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	109 MBit/s
Blackview R7 Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	102 MBit/s
Honor 5C Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.8 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Moto Z Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	360 MBit/s
UMI Super Euro Edition Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	108 MBit/s
Blackview R7 Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	79.4 MBit/s
Honor 5C Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash	58.3 MBit/s

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

UMi Max

Samsung Galaxy S7

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Cannon EOS 70D

click to load images

UMi Max

Samsung Galaxy S7

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Cannon EOS 70D

click to load images

UMi Max

Samsung Galaxy S7

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Cannon EOS 70D


484 cd/m²	503 cd/m²	537 cd/m²
481 cd/m²	522 cd/m²	532 cd/m²
463 cd/m²	463 cd/m²	500 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Sharp tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 537 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 498.3 cd/m² Minimum: 20.26 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 522 cd/m²
Contrast: 2270:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 9.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.38

	UMI Max IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50	UMI Touch IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50	Coolpad Torino S IPS, 1280x720, 4.70	ZTE Blade V7 Lite IPS, 1280x720, 5.00	Blackview R7 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50	Acer Liquid Z630S IPS, 1280x720, 5.50	Leagoo Shark 1 IPS, 1920x1080, 6.00	UMI Super Euro Edition IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50	Honor 5C IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20
Screen		-24%	-22%	-14%	-51%	-3%	-52%	4%	-15%
Brightness middle	522	424 -19%	360 -31%	312 -40%	552 6%	350 -33%	471 -10%	418 -20%	515 -1%
Brightness	498	415 -17%	358 -28%	302 -39%	526 6%	345 -31%	465 -7%	410 -18%	498 0%
Brightness Distribution	86	91 6%	87 1%	79 -8%	91 6%	84 -2%	82 -5%	85 -1%	93 8%
Black Level *	0.23	0.54 -135%	0.45 -96%	0.15 35%	0.64 -178%	0.27 -17%	0.9 -291%	0.31 -35%	0.49 -113%
Contrast	2270	785 -65%	800 -65%	2080 -8%	863 -62%	1296 -43%	523 -77%	1348 -41%	1051 -54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.9	6.9 -0%	6.8 1%	8.2 -19%	11 -59%	4.7 32%	7.1 -3%	4.4 36%	6.2 10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	12.3	10.9 11%	11.3 8%	16.5 -34%	20.8 -69%	8.5 31%	17 -38%	6.5 47%	11.4 7%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	9.2	6.8 26%	6.2 33%	9.2 -0%	14.3 -55%	5.6 39%	7.5 18%	3.6 61%	7.4 20%
Gamma	2.38 ^92%	1.99 ^111%	2.14 ^103%	2.29 ^96%	2.21 ^100%	1.84 ^120%	2.23 ^99%	2.36 ^93%	2.28 ^96%
CCT	8687 ^75%	8131 ^80%	7975 ^82%	9017 ^72%	12996 ^50%	6795 ^96%	8261 ^79%	6993 ^93%	8664 ^75%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17 ms rise
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
UMI Max	18.07 MB/s
UMI Touch	21.02 MB/s +16%
Coolpad Torino S	16.54 MB/s -8%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	12.62 MB/s -30%
Blackview R7	11.87 MB/s -34%
UMI Super Euro Edition	17.88 MB/s -1%
Honor 5C	24.21 MB/s +34%
Lenovo Moto Z	45.64 MB/s +153%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
UMI Max	36.64 MB/s
UMI Touch	42.92 MB/s +17%
Coolpad Torino S	25.79 MB/s -30%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	22.77 MB/s -38%
Blackview R7	15.56 MB/s -58%
UMI Super Euro Edition	36.22 MB/s -1%
Honor 5C	51.9 MB/s +42%
Lenovo Moto Z	78.5 MB/s +114%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
UMI Max	10.91 MB/s
UMI Touch	14.63 MB/s +34%
Coolpad Torino S	6.94 MB/s -36%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	8.26 MB/s -24%
Blackview R7	11.4 MB/s +4%
Acer Liquid Z630S	5.82 MB/s -47%
Leagoo Shark 1	6.4 MB/s -41%
UMI Super Euro Edition	11.88 MB/s +9%
Honor 5C	15.7 MB/s +44%
Lenovo Moto Z	74.9 MB/s +587%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
UMI Max	26.66 MB/s
UMI Touch	19.88 MB/s -25%
Coolpad Torino S	18.34 MB/s -31%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	18.24 MB/s -32%
Blackview R7	28.02 MB/s +5%
Acer Liquid Z630S	28.43 MB/s +7%
Leagoo Shark 1	29.6 MB/s +11%
UMI Super Euro Edition	28.17 MB/s +6%
Honor 5C	61.7 MB/s +131%
Lenovo Moto Z	117.2 MB/s +340%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
UMI Max	69.5 MB/s
UMI Touch	72.5 MB/s +4%
Coolpad Torino S	41.81 MB/s -40%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	70.3 MB/s +1%
Blackview R7	122.7 MB/s +77%
Acer Liquid Z630S	67.7 MB/s -3%
Leagoo Shark 1	39.6 MB/s -43%
UMI Super Euro Edition	126.9 MB/s +83%
Honor 5C	75.5 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Moto Z	168.3 MB/s +142%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
UMI Max	257.9 MB/s
UMI Touch	219.3 MB/s -15%
Coolpad Torino S	140.3 MB/s -46%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	187.3 MB/s -27%
Blackview R7	247.6 MB/s -4%
Acer Liquid Z630S	249 MB/s -3%
Leagoo Shark 1	264.1 MB/s +2%
UMI Super Euro Edition	257.8 MB/s 0%
Honor 5C	263 MB/s +2%
Lenovo Moto Z	439.7 MB/s +70%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
UMI Max	49057 Points
UMI Touch	38617 Points -21%
Coolpad Torino S	22766 Points -54%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	23822 Points -51%
Blackview R7	50572 Points +3%
Acer Liquid Z630S	35585 Points -27%
Leagoo Shark 1	34261 Points -30%
UMI Super Euro Edition	50072 Points +2%
Honor 5C	53143 Points +8%
Lenovo Moto Z	129197 Points +163%

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
UMI Touch	626 Points
Coolpad Torino S	494 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	404 Points
Honor 5C	906 Points
Lenovo Moto Z	2080 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
UMI Touch	2798 Points
Coolpad Torino S	1511 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	1147 Points
Honor 5C	3914 Points
Lenovo Moto Z	5450 Points

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
UMI Max	2701 Points
Blackview R7	2851 Points +6%
UMI Super Euro Edition	2818 Points +4%
Lenovo Moto Z	3946 Points +46%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
UMI Max	734 Points
Blackview R7	728 Points -1%
UMI Super Euro Edition	727 Points -1%
Lenovo Moto Z	1480 Points +102%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
UMI Max	10942 Points
UMI Touch	6795 Points -38%
Coolpad Torino S	4430 Points -60%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	3070 Points -72%
Blackview R7	10762 Points -2%
Acer Liquid Z630S	6868 Points -37%
Leagoo Shark 1	5568 Points -49%
UMI Super Euro Edition	10791 Points -1%
Honor 5C	11755 Points +7%
Lenovo Moto Z	25135 Points +130%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
UMI Max	10612 Points
UMI Touch	6186 Points -42%
Coolpad Torino S	3858 Points -64%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	2645 Points -75%
Blackview R7	10334 Points -3%
Acer Liquid Z630S	6250 Points -41%
Leagoo Shark 1	4920 Points -54%
UMI Super Euro Edition	10567 Points 0%
Honor 5C	11319 Points +7%
Lenovo Moto Z	26659 Points +151%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
UMI Max	12239 Points
UMI Touch	10368 Points -15%
Coolpad Torino S	9205 Points -25%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	7026 Points -43%
Blackview R7	12585 Points +3%
Acer Liquid Z630S	10508 Points -14%
Leagoo Shark 1	10325 Points -16%
UMI Super Euro Edition	11654 Points -5%
Honor 5C	13588 Points +11%
Lenovo Moto Z	20948 Points +71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
UMI Max	598 Points
UMI Touch	291 Points -51%
Coolpad Torino S	52 Points -91%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	124 Points -79%
Blackview R7	590 Points -1%
Acer Liquid Z630S	278 Points -54%
Leagoo Shark 1	278 Points -54%
UMI Super Euro Edition	595 Points -1%
Honor 5C	563 Points -6%
Lenovo Moto Z	3023 Points +406%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
UMI Max	521 Points
UMI Touch	241 Points -54%
Coolpad Torino S	41 Points -92%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	101 Points -81%
Blackview R7	518 Points -1%
Acer Liquid Z630S	229 Points -56%
Leagoo Shark 1	232 Points -55%
UMI Super Euro Edition	523 Points 0%
Honor 5C	480 Points -8%
Lenovo Moto Z	3718 Points +614%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
UMI Max	1239 Points
UMI Touch	1045 Points -16%
Coolpad Torino S	735 Points -41%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	618 Points -50%
Blackview R7	1155 Points -7%
Acer Liquid Z630S	1113 Points -10%
Leagoo Shark 1	890 Points -28%
UMI Super Euro Edition	1144 Points -8%
Honor 5C	1418 Points +14%
Lenovo Moto Z	1828 Points +48%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
UMI Max	17 fps
UMI Touch	12 fps -29%
Coolpad Torino S	5.3 fps -69%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	8.2 fps -52%
Blackview R7	17 fps 0%
Acer Liquid Z630S	21 fps +24%
Leagoo Shark 1	8.7 fps -49%
UMI Super Euro Edition	18 fps +6%
Honor 5C	20 fps +18%
Lenovo Moto Z	53 fps +212%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
UMI Max	17 fps
UMI Touch	12 fps -29%
Coolpad Torino S	9.8 fps -42%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	4.9 fps -71%
Blackview R7	17 fps 0%
Acer Liquid Z630S	12 fps -29%
Leagoo Shark 1	8.9 fps -48%
UMI Super Euro Edition	17 fps 0%
Honor 5C	19 fps +12%
Lenovo Moto Z	77 fps +353%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
UMI Max	7.1 fps
UMI Touch	4.5 fps -37%
Coolpad Torino S	1.8 fps -75%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	1.8 fps -75%
Blackview R7	4.7 fps -34%
Acer Liquid Z630S	9 fps +27%
Leagoo Shark 1	3.9 fps -45%
UMI Super Euro Edition	7.5 fps +6%
Honor 5C	8.4 fps +18%
Lenovo Moto Z	26 fps +266%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
UMI Max	7.1 fps
UMI Touch	4.5 fps -37%
Coolpad Torino S	4.3 fps -39%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	3.4 fps -52%
Blackview R7	4.7 fps -34%
Acer Liquid Z630S	4.2 fps -41%
Leagoo Shark 1	4.2 fps -41%
UMI Super Euro Edition	7.1 fps 0%
Honor 5C	7.9 fps +11%
Lenovo Moto Z	41 fps +477%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
UMI Max	4.7 fps
UMI Touch	2.9 fps -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	1.2 fps -74%
Blackview R7	2.5 fps -47%
Leagoo Shark 1	2.2 fps -53%
UMI Super Euro Edition	5.1 fps +9%
Honor 5C	4.9 fps +4%
Lenovo Moto Z	15 fps +219%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
UMI Max	4.7 fps
UMI Touch	2.9 fps -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	2.5 fps -47%
Blackview R7	2.5 fps -47%
Leagoo Shark 1	2.5 fps -47%
UMI Super Euro Edition	4.7 fps 0%
Honor 5C	4.5 fps -4%
Lenovo Moto Z	27 fps +474%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
UMI Max	4485 Points
UMI Touch	3787 Points -16%
Coolpad Torino S	3932 Points -12%
Blackview R7	4364 Points -3%
Acer Liquid Z630S	3814 Points -15%
Leagoo Shark 1	3398 Points -24%
UMI Super Euro Edition	4596 Points +2%
Honor 5C	5120 Points +14%
Lenovo Moto Z	7637 Points +70%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
UMI Max	341 Points
UMI Touch	717 Points +110%
Coolpad Torino S	602 Points +77%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	448 Points +31%
Blackview R7	338 Points -1%
Acer Liquid Z630S	691 Points +103%
Leagoo Shark 1	597 Points +75%
UMI Super Euro Edition	1043 Points +206%
Honor 5C	1225 Points +259%
Lenovo Moto Z	2356 Points +591%
System (sort by value)
UMI Max	2123 Points
UMI Touch	1343 Points -37%
Coolpad Torino S	1102 Points -48%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	801 Points -62%
Blackview R7	1971 Points -7%
Acer Liquid Z630S	1614 Points -24%
Leagoo Shark 1	1195 Points -44%
UMI Super Euro Edition	2187 Points +3%
Honor 5C	2600 Points +22%
Lenovo Moto Z	3398 Points +60%
Memory (sort by value)
UMI Max	998 Points
UMI Touch	787 Points -21%
Coolpad Torino S	607 Points -39%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	487 Points -51%
Blackview R7	1030 Points +3%
Acer Liquid Z630S	540 Points -46%
Leagoo Shark 1	515 Points -48%
UMI Super Euro Edition	1052 Points +5%
Honor 5C	1504 Points +51%
Lenovo Moto Z	2190 Points +119%
Graphics (sort by value)
UMI Max	666 Points
UMI Touch	429 Points -36%
Coolpad Torino S	321 Points -52%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	174 Points -74%
Blackview R7	655 Points -2%
Acer Liquid Z630S	416 Points -38%
Leagoo Shark 1	418 Points -37%
UMI Super Euro Edition	666 Points 0%
Honor 5C	814 Points +22%
Lenovo Moto Z	4321 Points +549%
Web (sort by value)
UMI Max	10 Points
UMI Touch	576 Points +5660%
Coolpad Torino S	599 Points +5890%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	592 Points +5820%
Blackview R7	10 Points 0%
Acer Liquid Z630S	627 Points +6170%
Leagoo Shark 1	611 Points +6010%
UMI Super Euro Edition	771 Points +7610%
Honor 5C	707 Points +6970%
Lenovo Moto Z	959 Points +9490%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
UMI Max	25.5 Points
UMI Touch	17.61 Points -31%
Coolpad Torino S	14.45 Points -43%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	12.73 Points -50%
Blackview R7	25.35 Points -1%
Acer Liquid Z630S	19.03 Points -25%
Leagoo Shark 1	17.24 Points -32%
UMI Super Euro Edition	26.21 Points +3%
Honor 5C	27.93 Points +10%
Lenovo Moto Z	47.5 Points +86%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
UMI Max	9796 ms *
UMI Touch	13953 ms * -42%
Coolpad Torino S	15784 ms * -61%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	19234 ms * -96%
Blackview R7	9748 ms * -0%
Acer Liquid Z630S	12876 ms * -31%
Leagoo Shark 1	14788 ms * -51%
UMI Super Euro Edition	9410 ms * +4%
Honor 5C	9111 ms * +7%
Lenovo Moto Z	3155 ms * +68%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
UMI Max	4231 Points
UMI Touch	2562 Points -39%
Coolpad Torino S	2364 Points -44%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	1910 Points -55%
Blackview R7	3885 Points -8%
Acer Liquid Z630S	2855 Points -33%
Leagoo Shark 1	2992 Points -29%
UMI Super Euro Edition	4117 Points -3%
Honor 5C	4188 Points -1%
Lenovo Moto Z	7771 Points +84%

Legend

UMI Max Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

UMI Touch Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Coolpad Torino S Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Blade V7 Lite Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Blackview R7 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Acer Liquid Z630S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Leagoo Shark 1 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

UMI Super Euro Edition Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


40.2 °C	38.8 °C	38.2 °C
38.1 °C	38.1 °C	38.3 °C
37.6 °C	37.8 °C	38.2 °C

Maximum: 40.2 °C
Average: 38.4 °C


33.8 °C	35.6 °C	36.3 °C
33.9 °C	35.3 °C	35.6 °C
33.8 °C	35.4 °C	35.7 °C

Maximum: 36.3 °C
Average: 35 °C

Power Supply (max.) 38.7 °C | Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

UMI Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Blackview R7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (44.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

ZTE Blade V7 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.12 / 0.4 Watt
Idle	1.02 / 1.53 / 1.62 Watt
Load	2.91 / 2.93 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	UMI Max 4000 mAh	UMI Touch 4000 mAh	Coolpad Torino S 1800 mAh	ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh	Blackview R7 3000 mAh	Acer Liquid Z630S 4000 mAh	Leagoo Shark 1 6300 mAh	UMI Super Euro Edition 4000 mAh	Honor 5C 3000 mAh
Power Consumption		-36%	-19%	6%	-122%	-65%	-96%	-60%	-30%
Idle Minimum *	1.02	0.89 13%	0.68 33%	0.63 38%	1.83 -79%	1.82 -78%	0.59 42%	0.84 18%	0.89 13%
Idle Average *	1.53	2 -31%	2.2 -44%	1.37 10%	3.21 -110%	2.35 -54%	3.22 -110%	1.94 -27%	2.07 -35%
Idle Maximum *	1.62	2.1 -30%	2.26 -40%	1.71 -6%	3.45 -113%	2.6 -60%	3.45 -113%	2.07 -28%	2.15 -33%
Load Average *	2.91	3.87 -33%	3.47 -19%	2.82 3%	5.67 -95%	3.69 -27%	6.93 -138%	5.88 -102%	3.46 -19%
Load Maximum *	2.93	5.79 -98%	3.71 -27%	3.36 -15%	9.16 -213%	5.98 -104%	7.59 -159%	7.67 -162%	5.18 -77%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		9h 48min

	UMI Max 4000 mAh	UMI Touch 4000 mAh	Coolpad Torino S 1800 mAh	ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh	Blackview R7 3000 mAh	Acer Liquid Z630S 4000 mAh	Leagoo Shark 1 6300 mAh	UMI Super Euro Edition 4000 mAh	Honor 5C 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	588	553 -6%	397 -32%	517 -12%	412 -30%	681 16%	542 -8%	638 9%	584 -1%

Pros

+ 高亮度高对比度IPS屏幕

+ 1080p分辨率

+ 铝制一体化机身

+ 智能按键

+ 低功耗/发热

+ 超长电池续航时间

+ 支持LTE Band 20

+ 3 GB 内存

+ 双频WLAN

+ 指纹识别

+ 良好的性能及高速eMMC存储（在这个价位上）

Cons

- 偏重

- 工艺缺陷

- GPS模块轻微不准确

- 成像模糊

- 充电时间

In Review: UMi Max. Test model provided by Gearbest.com

我们的测试表明，UMi Max是一台有着优秀外观的入门级手机，尽管有一些细小的工艺缺陷。考虑到它的价格，一些缺点是可以被接受的，例如：不准确的GPS模块，相对来说偏重的重量以及较长的相机加载时间。内置eMMC存储和SD卡读卡器的访问速度都偏低，这在入门级手机上是一个典型问题。

在另一方面，UMi Max以它有着高亮度，高分辨率以及出色对比度的屏幕得到了高分。在这个价位上很少看到这么好的屏幕。此外，它的性能和连接性都非常好。耗电量很低而且支持快速充电。

如果5.5寸显示屏和199g（约合7盎司）的重量不被考虑在内问题的话，作为入门级手机我们推荐UMi Max。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

UMI Max - 2016-11-07 11/07/2016 v5.1^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

82%

Keyboard

66 / 75 → 88%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

44 / 60 → 74%

Weight

88%

Battery

92%

Display

82%

Games Performance

25 / 63 → 39%

Application Performance

41 / 70 → 58%

Temperature

89%

Noise

100%

Audio

54 / 91 → 59%

Camera

58%

Average

70%

81%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > UMi Max 智能手机简短评测

Marcus Herbrich, 2016-11-28 (Update: 2016-11-28)

UMi Max 智能手机简短评测

Size comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

UMI Max audio analysis

Blackview R7 audio analysis

ZTE Blade V7 Lite audio analysis

Pros

Cons

Pricecompare