Notebookcheck

索尼 Xperia XA 智能手机简短评测

Andreas Kilian, Manuel Masiero (translated by Yuchen Wang), 08/30/2016
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

黄金时代? 索尼Xperia XA是最新推出的一台设计感十足的中端智能手机。爱美人士应该很快就会注意到它很窄的屏幕边框和简洁机身设计。不过它的内在实力也能领先于竞争对手吗?

Sony Xperia XA (Xperia Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memory
2048 MB 
Display
5 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, 电容式触控屏幕, Super Vivid-Modus, Mobile BRAVIA Engine 2, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 8.4 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合耳机接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最大支持 200 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速感应器,近距感应器,陀螺仪,指南针, Wi-Fi Direct, Miracast, DLNA, nano-SIM, USB-OTG, FM收音机
Networking
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (频段 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20) Cat 4 (最高 50 Mbit/s 上传, 150 Mbit/s 下载), 身体辐射值: 0.473 W/kg, 头部辐射值: 0.471 W/kg, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 143.6 x 66.8
Battery
8.7 Wh, 2300 mAh
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (自动对焦 f/2.0, 1080p 视频拍摄 @ 30 fps)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (自动对焦 f/2.0, 1080p 视频拍摄 @ 30 fps)
Additional features
Speakers: 底部单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器,USB数据线,耳机, Playstation, FM radio, Movie Creator, TrackID, Sketch, SwiftKey, AR Effect, Spotify, Facebook, Amazon Shopping, Xperia Lounge, Kobo eBooks, Sky Go, AVG Protection, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
137 g, Power Supply: 54 g
Price
300 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Sony Xperia XA front
Sony Xperia XA front
Sony Xperia XA front
Sony Xperia XA front
Sony Xperia XA rear
Sony Xperia XA side
Sony Xperia XA camera
Sony Xperia XA card slots
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
303 MBit/s ∼100% +228%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
249 MBit/s ∼82% +169%
Sony Xperia X
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
244 MBit/s ∼81% +164%
Sony Xperia XA
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
92.5 MBit/s ∼31%
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.8 MBit/s ∼16% -46%
Wiko Lenny 3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
44.8 MBit/s ∼15% -52%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
290 MBit/s ∼100% +247%
Sony Xperia X
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
219 MBit/s ∼76% +162%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
205 MBit/s ∼71% +145%
Sony Xperia XA
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
83.6 MBit/s ∼29%
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
58.3 MBit/s ∼20% -30%
Wiko Lenny 3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.2 MBit/s ∼17% -41%
Garmin Edge 500 - route
Garmin Edge 500 - route
Garmin Edge 500 - underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Sony Xperia XA - route
Sony Xperia XA - route
Sony Xperia XA - underpass
Sony Xperia XA - underpass
Sony Xperia XA - turning point
Sony Xperia XA - turning point
Camera app: Clever automatic
Camera app: Clever automatic
Camera app: Additional modes
Camera app: Additional modes

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
421
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
518
cd/m²
518
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Super Vivid-Modus, Mobile BRAVIA Engine 2
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 518 cd/m² Average: 475 cd/m² Minimum: 4.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 518 cd/m²
Contrast: 849:1 (Black: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
Gamma: 2.35
Sony Xperia XA
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 4.7
Huawei P9 Lite
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
ZTE Blade V7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Microsoft Lumia 650
OLED, 1280x720, 5
Screen
10%
34%
10%
-14%
20%
Brightness middle
518
289
-44%
386
-25%
505
-3%
409
-21%
349
-33%
Brightness
475
291
-39%
394
-17%
468
-1%
411
-13%
353
-26%
Brightness Distribution
81
96
19%
88
9%
88
9%
96
19%
92
14%
Black Level *
0.61
0.74
-21%
0.38
38%
Contrast
849
682
-20%
1076
27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.8
4.7
31%
1.11
84%
4.1
40%
9.4
-38%
2.6
62%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.4
7.3
36%
3.35
71%
5.8
49%
17.6
-54%
8.2
28%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7
3
57%
1.34
81%
4.9
30%
11.6
-66%
1.8
74%
Gamma
2.35 94%
2.03 108%
2.12 104%
2.5 88%
2.25 98%
2.06 107%
CCT
8151 80%
6291 103%
6441 101%
7116 91%
9597 68%
6542 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17077 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
48331 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
27232 Points ∼9% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
35964 Points ∼12% -26%
Huawei P9 Lite
50366 Points ∼17% +4%
ZTE Blade V7
37070 Points ∼13% -23%
Microsoft Lumia 650
31844 Points ∼11% -34%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
4685 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4126 Points ∼21% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
4051 Points ∼21% -14%
Huawei P9 Lite
5339 Points ∼27% +14%
ZTE Blade V7
3947 Points ∼20% -16%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
717 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
551 Points ∼27% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
756 Points ∼37% +5%
Huawei P9 Lite
765 Points ∼38% +7%
ZTE Blade V7
10 Points ∼0% -99%
Microsoft Lumia 650
546 Points ∼27% -24%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
669 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
312 Points ∼1% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
415 Points ∼1% -38%
Huawei P9 Lite
818 Points ∼3% +22%
ZTE Blade V7
430 Points ∼1% -36%
Microsoft Lumia 650
207 Points ∼1% -69%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
2289 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1060 Points ∼6% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
1380 Points ∼8% -40%
Huawei P9 Lite
2438 Points ∼15% +7%
ZTE Blade V7
1188 Points ∼7% -48%
Microsoft Lumia 650
552 Points ∼3% -76%
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
1043 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
585 Points ∼7% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
662 Points ∼8% -37%
Huawei P9 Lite
1197 Points ∼14% +15%
ZTE Blade V7
249 Points ∼3% -76%
Microsoft Lumia 650
435 Points ∼5% -58%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
18 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
5.2 fps ∼0% -71%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
12 fps ∼0% -33%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps ∼0% +6%
ZTE Blade V7
12 fps ∼0% -33%
Microsoft Lumia 650
3.25 fps ∼0% -82%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
28 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9.7 fps ∼0% -65%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
20 fps ∼1% -29%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps ∼1% -32%
ZTE Blade V7
12 fps ∼0% -57%
Microsoft Lumia 650
5.67 fps ∼0% -80%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
7.2 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1.8 fps ∼0% -75%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
4.1 fps ∼1% -43%
Huawei P9 Lite
7.8 fps ∼1% +8%
ZTE Blade V7
4.5 fps ∼1% -37%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
15 fps ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3.8 fps ∼1% -75%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
8.4 fps ∼2% -44%
Huawei P9 Lite
8.4 fps ∼2% -44%
ZTE Blade V7
4.5 fps ∼1% -70%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
4.8 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.5 fps ∼0% -6%
ZTE Blade V7
2.9 fps ∼0% -40%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
11 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.9 fps ∼0% -55%
ZTE Blade V7
2.9 fps ∼0% -74%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
2.5 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei P9 Lite
2.8 fps ∼1% +12%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
5.4 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei P9 Lite
2.9 fps ∼1% -46%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
1259 Points ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
709 Points ∼14% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
916 Points ∼18% -27%
Huawei P9 Lite
1373 Points ∼27% +9%
ZTE Blade V7
944 Points ∼19% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
525 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
42 Points ∼0% -92%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
235 Points ∼2% -55%
Huawei P9 Lite
473 Points ∼4% -10%
ZTE Blade V7
245 Points ∼2% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
603 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
53 Points ∼1% -91%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
281 Points ∼3% -53%
Huawei P9 Lite
554 Points ∼6% -8%
ZTE Blade V7
293 Points ∼3% -51%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
12138 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9022 Points ∼10% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
11653 Points ∼13% -4%
Huawei P9 Lite
13676 Points ∼16% +13%
ZTE Blade V7
10430 Points ∼12% -14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
10916 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3838 Points ∼1% -65%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
6522 Points ∼1% -40%
Huawei P9 Lite
11318 Points ∼2% +4%
ZTE Blade V7
6170 Points ∼1% -43%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
11156 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4400 Points ∼2% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7229 Points ∼3% -35%
Huawei P9 Lite
11769 Points ∼5% +5%
ZTE Blade V7
6786 Points ∼3% -39%

Legend

 
Sony Xperia XA Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Samsung Exynos 7578, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V7 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
9609.8 ms * ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
13046 ms * ∼22% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
11796.2 ms * ∼20% -23%
Huawei P9 Lite
9396.5 ms * ∼16% +2%
ZTE Blade V7
13761.1 ms * ∼23% -43%
Microsoft Lumia 650
18237.4 ms * ∼31% -90%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
4046 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
2730 Points ∼5% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
3566 Points ∼7% -12%
Huawei P9 Lite
4756 Points ∼9% +18%
ZTE Blade V7
2689 Points ∼5% -34%
Microsoft Lumia 650
2574 Points ∼5% -36%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
72 Points ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
47 Points ∼6% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
64 Points ∼8% -11%
Huawei P9 Lite
67 Points ∼8% -7%
Microsoft Lumia 650
52 Points ∼6% -28%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
27.5 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
16.8 Points ∼5% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
22.1 Points ∼6% -20%
Huawei P9 Lite
29.03 Points ∼8% +6%
ZTE Blade V7
18.19 Points ∼5% -34%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
50.68 MB/s ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
46.61 MB/s ∼53% -8%
Huawei P9 Lite
25.1 MB/s ∼29% -50%
ZTE Blade V7
20.89 MB/s ∼24% -59%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
72.87 MB/s ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
79.83 MB/s ∼83% +10%
Huawei P9 Lite
60.81 MB/s ∼63% -17%
ZTE Blade V7
43.67 MB/s ∼45% -40%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
10.6 MB/s ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
11.6 MB/s ∼4% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
10.27 MB/s ∼4% -3%
Huawei P9 Lite
15.35 MB/s ∼6% +45%
ZTE Blade V7
7.58 MB/s ∼3% -28%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
22.05 MB/s ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
21 MB/s ∼9% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
21.92 MB/s ∼10% -1%
Huawei P9 Lite
38.22 MB/s ∼17% +73%
ZTE Blade V7
28.07 MB/s ∼12% +27%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
68.64 MB/s ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
72 MB/s ∼10% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
27.27 MB/s ∼4% -60%
Huawei P9 Lite
46.24 MB/s ∼6% -33%
ZTE Blade V7
39.45 MB/s ∼5% -43%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
240.43 MB/s ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
147 MB/s ∼8% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
168.79 MB/s ∼9% -30%
Huawei P9 Lite
283.55 MB/s ∼16% +18%
ZTE Blade V7
196.76 MB/s ∼11% -18%
BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA
1076 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
643 Points ∼9% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
443 Points ∼6% -59%
Huawei P9 Lite
1346 Points ∼18% +25%
ZTE Blade V7
790 Points ∼11% -27%
Microsoft Lumia 650
575 Points ∼8% -47%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high27 fps
 very low29 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high59 fps
Max. Load
 41.7 °C41.6 °C37.1 °C 
 42 °C41.6 °C36.6 °C 
 40.4 °C40.2 °C36.3 °C 
Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 39.7 °C
33.9 °C38.2 °C41.4 °C
35.4 °C37.4 °C41.7 °C
32.3 °C38.4 °C41.5 °C
Maximum: 41.7 °C
Average: 37.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  30.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202832.4282533.331.333.33132.531.732.54034.92634.95047.639.447.66333.736.233.78030.728.630.710027.925.427.912530.421.330.416033.223.333.220035.122.535.125041.822.441.831545.421.345.44005018.45050055.817.555.863060.517.560.58006717.267100067.416.867.4125068.117.368.1160064.817.464.8200058.716.658.725006417.364315071.517.671.540007417.674500074.517.774.5630073.917.473.980007117.7711000069.417.969.41250058.318.158.31600048.918.148.9SPL8229.882N48.51.348.5median 60.5median 17.7median 60.5Delta11.61.611.640.731.832.440.732.731.831.332.730.834.231.730.831.830.42631.836.633.139.436.633.330.936.233.332.42528.632.429.624.325.429.631.523.921.331.536.324.323.336.344.329.822.544.352.236.622.452.257.341.721.357.362.747.118.462.764.950.117.564.96752.517.56769.153.917.269.17254.216.8727454.217.37475.755.317.475.775.756.916.675.776.157.817.376.17757.917.67779.159.517.679.180.161.117.780.178.359.417.478.377.358.417.777.378.859.717.978.872.953.518.172.956.83718.156.888.469.529.888.473.724.21.373.7median 72median 53.9median 17.7median 7211.19.91.611.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSony Xperia XAHuawei P9 Lite
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.22 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.72 / 1.5 / 1.57 Watt
Load midlight 3.48 / 6.04 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
2300 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
ZTE Blade V7
2540 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 650
2000 mAh
Power Consumption
20%
10%
-15%
10%
14%
Idle Minimum *
0.72
0.61
15%
0.96
-33%
0.73
-1%
0.73
-1%
0.7
3%
Idle Average *
1.5
1.41
6%
1.39
7%
2.09
-39%
0.92
39%
1.1
27%
Idle Maximum *
1.57
1.51
4%
1.45
8%
2.11
-34%
0.93
41%
1.18
25%
Load Average *
3.48
2.56
26%
2.65
24%
4.15
-19%
4.47
-28%
4.04
-16%
Load Maximum *
6.04
3.1
49%
3.51
42%
5.05
16%
5.96
1%
4.07
33%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
12h 55min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 50min
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
2300 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
ZTE Blade V7
2540 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 650
2000 mAh
Battery Runtime
92%
111%
59%
47%
13%
Reader / Idle
775
1599
106%
1978
155%
1404
81%
910
17%
H.264
460
658
43%
863
88%
568
23%
510
11%
WiFi v1.3
353
643
82%
628
78%
604
71%
519
47%
345
-2%
Load
170
402
136%
376
121%
272
60%
213
25%

Pros

+ 纤薄的机身
+ 独立相机键
+ microSD卡槽支持App2SD
+ 支持Micacast,USB OTG和DLNA
+ 支持5 GHz无线网
+ 不错的自动对焦前置相机
+ 不错的整体性能
+ 安卓6.0棉花糖
+ 优秀的耳机通话品质
+ 支持快速充电

Cons

- 电池续航短
- 无指纹识别器
- 测试机的触控屏幕存在问题
- 车载功能较弱
- 主相机视频拍摄对焦存在问题
- 不可更换电池
- 未附带Pump Express+ 2.0充电器
In review: Sony Xperia XA (F3111). Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Sony Xperia XA (F3111). Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

索尼的新Xperia XA中端智能手机凭借优秀的配置得到了一些额外的分数:它16 GB的内部存储空间可以通过micro-SD卡方便地扩展,micro-USB接口支持OTG功能,同时还提供了NFC功能。不过,可以用于更便捷地解锁手机的指纹识别器并没有得到支持。喜欢拍照的用户应该会对独立的快门键情有独钟,而它的主相机也有很高的像素数以及自动对焦功能。与同类机型相似的是,用户需要在照片品质上做出一些妥协。我们也很喜欢它性能优秀的MediaTek整合芯片和明亮的屏幕。不过,反复出现的触控屏幕问题,在测试中让我们感到十分烦躁。对很多潜在消费者来说无法接受的一点可能会是它较短的电池续航。

Xperia XA的主要卖点是它纤薄的外形,同时快速的处理器、明亮的屏幕和可扩展的存储空间也十分让人喜欢。最后,较短的续航时间破坏了这台测试机均衡的整体表现。

市场价270欧元(约2011人民币)的Xperia XA属于目前中端智能手机市场较贵的机型。我们的测试结果表明,华为 P9 Lite将会是它的主要竞争机型之一。这款机型提供了更大的屏幕,更长的电池续航和内置的指纹识别器,它的起售价也同样为270欧元(约2011人民币)。 

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Sony Xperia XA - 08/10/2016 v5.1(old)
Andreas Kilian

Chassis
83%
Keyboard
68 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
77%
Connectivity
45 / 60 → 74%
Weight
93%
Battery
88%
Display
81%
Games Performance
25 / 63 → 40%
Application Performance
44 / 70 → 63%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Camera
70%
Average
71%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 索尼 Xperia XA 智能手机简短评测
Andreas Kilian, 2016-08-30 (Update: 2016-08-31)