Notebookcheck Logo

申科XMG Pro 17 E22评论。配备RTX 3080 Ti的游戏笔记本电脑提供的货物

令人振奋。 英特尔酷睿i9-12900H,本身已经很强大,不仅有Nvidia的高级显卡支持。广泛的连接和非常明显的冷却系统也表明,这款笔记本电脑正在努力追求最高性能。然而,申克公司称这台笔记本电脑为游戏工作站可能有另一个原因,这在我们的审查中也变得很明显。
Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook

乍一看,Schenker用XMG Pro 17 E22创造了一个真正的游戏笔记本电脑。虽然机箱不会赢得任何设计奖,但键盘在任何想要的颜色中都会闪闪发光,作为回报。大的通风口和相当厚的机箱使英特尔Alder Lake处理器,以及NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 Ti或3080 Ti有足够的冷却,以确保相应的优秀性能率所需的高功率供应。花费大约2500至3500欧元(约合人民币2557至3840元),你可以配置一台雄心勃勃的中端笔记本电脑,或者如果你喜欢,可以配置一台相当出色的高端笔记本电脑,比如我们拥有的英特尔酷睿i9-12900H、NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti、32GB内存和1TB SSD。

但还有更多。也可以选择覆盖AdobeRGB色彩空间的预校准4K显示器,而不是典型的sRGB显示器,具有合适的QHD分辨率。然而,这使价格接近4000欧元(约合人民币4092元)。相当多的桌面系统在视频和图像编辑或渲染方面可能会落后。

因此,竞争者包括游戏笔记本电脑,如 宏碁掠夺者Triton 500SE,以及华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo 16,以及 Alienware x17 R2以及 MSI Raider GE77,这也是针对创作者的。

Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22 (XMG Pro 17 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 125 W PL2 / Short Burst, 115 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16384 MB, Core: 1485 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz, 155 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 512.95
Memory
32768 MB 
, PC4-3200 dual-channel
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, BOE099D, IPS, glossy: no, 165 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, 1024 GB 
, 895 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 0 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 2, Card Reader: microSD
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 27 x 396 x 262
Battery
80 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: 1
Primary Camera: 2 MPix Full HD webcam
Additional features
Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, ControlCenter3.0, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.849 kg, Power Supply: 575 g
Price
3,546 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85.4 %
07/2022
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.8 kg27 mm17.30"2560x1440
86.8 %
07/2022
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3.1 kg25.9 mm17.30"3840x2160
87.2 %
06/2022
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
84.7 %
01/2022
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg19.9 mm17.30"3840x2160
88.2 %
05/2022
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.6 kg20.5 mm16.00"3840x2400
80.3 %
06/2022
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg27.5 mm15.60"1920x1080
89.2 %
05/2022
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3.1 kg20.9 mm17.30"1920x1080

外壳 - 中等的游戏笔记本,有很多黑色的东西

黑色的外壳,其下部完全由塑料制成,看起来不那么优雅,但非常实用。只有显示器的背面是用铝制盖子固定的,也是黑色的。然而,考虑到17.3英寸的尺寸,其他任何东西都是令人惊讶的。不幸的是,这些表面都很容易受到指纹的影响。

屏幕可以用一只手舒适地打开,但随后它就有点摇晃了。总的来说,它给人的印象是稳定的,而且几乎不能扭动。这甚至适用于下面的部分。尽管有明显的重量,但当拿着一个角时,箱子几乎保持完全水平。金属部件比例较高的型号在这一点上并没有做得更好。

唯一值得注意的是延伸到整个笔记本周围的大型通风口。此外,底盖几乎在一半的表面上允许与环境进行空气交换。这也为放置笔记本电脑的位置提供了明确的依据。一个平坦的桌面,两侧和朝后有足够的空间。

很难设计出一个更重更大的笔记本电脑。自然,这是由于大屏幕和强大的组件所带来的。同时,这些都在机箱内提供了足够的空间用于散热和通风。但是,XMG Pro 17 e22只有在有限的范围内才是真正的移动和便携。一个足够大和坚固的袋子是携带该设备的先决条件,该设备包括电源适配器在内重约3.5公斤。

你还必须考虑到,27毫米的厚度伴随着高度为5毫米的脚,这确保了足够的地面间隙,以便于冷却。

尺寸比较

396 mm 262 mm 27 mm 2.8 kg397 mm 284 mm 25.9 mm 3.1 kg395.9 mm 264.95 mm 19.9 mm 2.4 kg359 mm 262 mm 27.5 mm 2.3 kg358.5 mm 262.4 mm 19.9 mm 2.3 kg355 mm 266 mm 20.5 mm 2.6 kg

连接性 - 在五个显示器上进行游戏

有足够空间的大箱子几乎什么都有。读卡器、LAN端口、4个USB端口和4个视频输出没有留下任何遗憾。

电源和三个视频端口放置在背面,使得工作空间很干净。特别是在作为工作站使用时,可变的显示器端口,每个都支持高达8K,可能是一个优势。另一方面,对于游戏来说,一个肯定足够了。

布局并不是那么完美无缺。两个USB-A端口都在左边,而且它们之间也只有6毫米的距离。这在大多数情况下是足够的,但U盘可能会相互阻隔。右边的另一个USB端口会改善整体设计。关于microSD卡的决定也没有意义。本来有足够的空间放置一个完整的卡槽。

左边:2个USB-A(5Gb/s),耳机,麦克风+S/PDIF
左边:2个USB-A(5Gb/s),耳机,麦克风+S/PDIF
右边:microSD,USB-C(10Gb/s,DP),千兆位网络
右边:microSD,USB-C(10Gb/s,DP),千兆位网络
背面。电源、Thunderbolt 4、HDMI 2.1、DP 1.4、Kensington锁
背面。电源、Thunderbolt 4、HDMI 2.1、DP 1.4、Kensington锁

SD卡阅读器

我们的参考卡,AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60,仍然离其潜力很远。与最高分以及游戏笔记本中的平均分的差距是相当大的。其他笔记本电脑如Alienware x17 R2 P48E能以三倍的速度复制、读取和覆写数据。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV Pro V60)
182.9 MB/s ∼100% +177%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
155 MB/s ∼85% +135%
Average of class Gaming
  (18.5 - 222, n=89, last 2 years)
114.8 MB/s ∼63% +74%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
68 MB/s ∼37% +3%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
66 MB/s ∼36%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
60 MB/s ∼33% -9%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV Pro V60)
220.6 MB/s ∼100% +145%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
185 MB/s ∼84% +106%
Average of class Gaming
  (20.5 - 263, n=79, last 2 years)
136.5 MB/s ∼62% +52%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
90 MB/s ∼41%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
72 MB/s ∼33% -20%

沟通

Wi-Fi模块完全没有理由抱怨。它的传输率在测试中保持绝对稳定,而且在技术上可能的范围内。

Networking - iperf3 receive AXE11000
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1724 (1672min - 1746max) MBit/s ∼100%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1698 (805min - 1720max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1692 (1567min - 1738max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW)
1664 (1649min - 1680max) MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (787 - 1748, n=26, last 2 years)
1563 MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (1167 - 1724, n=18)
1543 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1724 (1672-1746)
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW); iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1663 (1649-1680)
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW); iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1565 (988-1682)

网络摄像头

由于采用了全高清分辨率,但遗憾的是只有30帧,图像质量可以接受。颜色偏差也是可以接受的,它们不会导致任何立即可见的颜色不准确。特别是当涉及到视频通话时,网络摄像头的配置很好。

麦克风也做得很好。如果你不直接对着它说话,质量会受到一些影响,但一般来说,独立于方向拾取用户声音的能力只对商务笔记本电脑很重要。

ColorChecker
10.6 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
16 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22: 10.34 ∆E min: 4.41 - max: 16.42 ∆E

维护

在进行后期升级或清洁风扇方面没有任何障碍。虽然仍然需要卸下16颗螺丝,但它们都可以公开接触,而且长度相同。然后,整个底盖可以不费吹灰之力就被卸下。建议从铰链的地方开始。

这样就可以接触到双风扇。电池也可以很容易地被更换。这更适用于内存和M.2 SSD。这里各有两个接口,要么在购买时就被占用,要么以后也可以升级。

Wi-Fi模块的位置很不寻常,因为它被直接放在固态硬盘的下面。它也可以被替换。总的来说,值得注意的是,无论是固态硬盘还是内存,都没有任何散热元件。这并不是最好的决定,因为内部温度会随着性能的提高而上升。

Wi-Fi模块隐藏在SSD下面。
Wi-Fi模块隐藏在SSD下面。

输入设备 - XMG Pro 17配备了一个值得信赖的游戏键盘

不用说,Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22有一个RGB键盘。除了一些流动的、脉动的和部分刺激性的颜色渐变外,每个键或某个区域都可以定制。应该赞扬的是1.5毫米的行程。这明显高于标准笔记本键盘。因此,打字是愉快的,这也是由于良好的反馈。只有略微弯曲的键盘框架可以做得更结实。

15 x 9厘米的触摸板反应精确,易于使用。触摸板下面的两个按键几乎是相反的,它们被隐蔽地放置在触摸板下面。压力点似乎并不精确,有时,只有更用力地按下才会触发一个动作。然而,由于鼠标几乎总是与游戏笔记本或工作站一起使用,只有少数用户会为此感到困扰。

显示器--申克游戏笔记本的稳固率

子像素网格
子像素网格
底部角落有轻微的屏幕渗漏。
底部角落有轻微的屏幕渗漏。

我们评测的XMG Pro 17 E22具有一个几乎经典的游戏显示屏。最重要的方面是采用QHD分辨率,刷新率为165赫兹,以及sRGB色彩空间。此外,17.3英寸在短距离内看起来总是相当令人印象深刻。

约1,100:1的对比度也是引人注目的。这表明了一个良好的黑色水平,因为最大亮度是相当温和的。仅低于300cd/m²的亮度几乎不足以看清户外的任何东西,也不足以显示HDR内容中的巨大对比度差异。不过,这两者对于游戏来说都不一定需要。

专业媒体编辑也可以使用AdobeRGB和400 cd/m²的4K显示器。这绝对是在旅途中执行高要求任务的一个选择。否则,有这么多视频端口可用,以后也可以连接适当的显示器。

我们没有注意到不同亮度下的PWM闪烁。

322
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE099D
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 349 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 319.4 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 349 cd/m²
Contrast: 1091:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3, calibrated: 0.64
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
85.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.09
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
BOE099D, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
AU Optronics B173ZAN06.1, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
NE160QDM-NZ2, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16.00
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
AUO B173ZAN3.0 (AUO309B), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS-Level, 3840x2400, 16.00
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
AU Optronics AUOAF90, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
AU Optronics B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display
0%
0%
2%
1%
-52%
-9%
Display P3 Coverage
97.5
96.6
-1%
97.3
0%
87.1
-11%
98
1%
39.1
-60%
79.2
-19%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
99.8
0%
100
0%
100
0%
99.9
0%
58.3
-42%
99.8
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
85.2
85.8
1%
84.9
0%
100
17%
86.3
1%
40.4
-53%
79.6
-7%
Response Times
6%
-75%
-573%
-76%
-480%
-83%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
5.4 ?(2.3, 3.1)
5.8 ?(1.6, 4.2)
-7%
13.8 ?(6.3, 7.5)
-156%
46.8 ?(23.4, 23.4)
-767%
14.6 ?(6.7, 7.9)
-170%
40 ?(18.8, 21.2)
-641%
12.4 ?(6.4, 6)
-130%
Response Time Black / White *
6.8 ?(2.9, 3.9)
5.6 ?(1.9, 3.7)
18%
6.4 ?(1.8, 4.6)
6%
32.6 ?(16.6, 16)
-379%
5.6 ?(2, 3.6)
18%
28.4 ?(15.2, 13.2)
-318%
9.2 ?(5.2, 4)
-35%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-61%
21%
-66%
-10%
-79%
-2%
Brightness middle
349
381
9%
498
43%
475
36%
459
32%
227
-35%
365.4
5%
Brightness
319
371
16%
468
47%
451
41%
434
36%
225
-29%
344
8%
Brightness Distribution
83
84
1%
80
-4%
84
1%
88
6%
90
8%
85
2%
Black Level *
0.32
0.52
-63%
0.36
-13%
0.34
-6%
0.44
-38%
0.21
34%
0.29
9%
Contrast
1091
733
-33%
1383
27%
1397
28%
1043
-4%
1081
-1%
1260
15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.5
1.77
29%
5.84
-134%
2.97
-19%
4.19
-68%
3.17
-27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.87
5.24
24%
9.97
-45%
8.13
-18%
17.45
-154%
7.69
-12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.64
2.53
-295%
0.63
2%
3.51
-448%
1.03
-61%
3.81
-495%
0.51
20%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.9
2.4
38%
6.56
-68%
4.9
-26%
2.7
31%
5.3
-36%
Gamma
2.09 105%
2.14 103%
2.42 91%
2.235 98%
2.208 100%
2.18 101%
CCT
7192 90%
7046 92%
6376 102%
6775 96%
6176 105%
5879 111%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-18% / -32%
-18% / 3%
-212% / -124%
-28% / -17%
-204% / -130%
-31% / -15%

* ... smaller is better

正如申克公司所承诺的那样,我们在XMG Pro 17 E22的显示屏上测量到几乎完全覆盖了sRGB色彩空间。例如,用于电影制作的DCI-P3,也几乎完全覆盖。AdobeRGB色彩空间,包括更大的绿色和蓝色范围,仍然覆盖了80%以上。在任何情况下,该显示器都证明了其丰富的色彩。

而且它的调校非常准确。即使在校准之前,我们测量的DeltaE为2.5。肉眼不再能感觉到小于3的颜色偏差。之后,该值下降到只有0.6,这一事实清楚地说明了该面板的作用。相应的色彩配置文件可在包含显示器细节的盒子里下载。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)


XMG Pro 17 E22与sRGB对比
XMG Pro 17 E22与sRGB对比
XMG Pro 17 E22 VS. AdobeRGB
XMG Pro 17 E22 VS. AdobeRGB
XMG Pro 17 E22 vs. P3
XMG Pro 17 E22 vs. P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.9 ms rise
↘ 3.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.3 ms rise
↘ 3.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19959 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

申克的游戏笔记本电脑不一定是真正的便携式,这就是为什么显示器在阳光下的可用性只是很少被要求。尽管峰值亮度相当低,但特别是文本仍然容易阅读。

相反,在太亮的环境下,颜色会褪色。然而,在阴暗的阳台上应该不会出现明显的问题,特别是由于略带哑光的显示屏在防止恼人的反射方面做得很好。

正如预期的那样,IPS面板在任何视角下都很容易辨认。即使远远超过45°范围,也没有颜色或对比度的变化。

性能 - i9和RTX 3080 Ti有很大的空间

Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22当然也不缺乏性能资源。有了i9-12900H英特尔桤木湖处理器和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti,该系统使用的硬件已被证明是快速的,它甚至为高度复杂的程序做好了准备。

有了i7-12700H和RTX 3070 Ti,仍然可以节省处理器以及显卡的费用。这种入门级变体对于现代游戏来说仍然是绰绰有余的,即使有些游戏不能以完整的细节播放。不过,如果游戏是重点,RTX 3080 Ti至少看起来很合理,而稍逊的处理器应该不会造成任何问题。

如果XMG Pro 17 E22打算同时作为工作站和游戏笔记本电脑,建议使用最大配置,最好结合至少32GB的内存。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z RAM
CPU-Z RAM
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
HWiNFO

测试条件

控制中心3.0
控制中心3.0

宽敞的机箱允许高功率消耗,因为有足够的空间进行冷却。在短时间内,处理器有125瓦可供支配。显卡的消耗量高达155瓦,其中25瓦可以以 "动态提升 "的形式从CPU中转出。

有四种模式可供选择,以使这种性能适应各自的任务或工作环境。我们在做基准测试时总是使用性能模式。此外,还有一个略微缩小的娱乐模式,一个令人难以置信的高效静音模式(这个名字绝不准确),以及一个省电模式,在用电池供电的情况下,可以再增加近10%的电池寿命。

有趣的是,静音模式的功耗设置甚至比省电模式更低。这种模式相应地凉爽、安静,但风扇总是可以听到,你可以在日常工作中不必忍受明显的性能损失。

概况 PL1 PL2
性能模式 115 W 125 W
娱乐模式 65 W 115 W
静音模式 35 W 65 W
省电模式 45 W 65 W

处理器

共有14个内核和20个线程,没有什么能撼动英特尔酷睿i9-12900H。该处理器的最大时钟频率为5GHz,也说明了其性能。特别是,"桤木湖 "型号可以明显超过英特尔前几代CPU的性能。在我们的Cinebench R15耐力测试中,AMD也被甩在后面。我们的CPU基准测试文章提供了不同处理器的性能率的完整概述。

然而,由于Schenker "只 "允许最大125瓦,XMG Pro 17 E22在更长的时间内允许115瓦,即使是配备i7-12700H的笔记本电脑也能与之匹配。其他具有相同CPU的游戏笔记本,如 华硕ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW,只是允许更高的功耗,这自然会提高原始处理器的性能。在这种特定情况下,功耗增加15%就会转化为10%的结果。不过,增加的冷却要求对图形性能的影响程度是另一回事。

在电池模式下,处理能力会大大降低。处理器只被允许使用略低于25瓦的功率。注册的时钟频率也从3.5GHz降至1.5GHz。因此,与最高性能相比,Cinebench R15的得分下降了大约一半。

首先是最大性能下的Cinebench,然后是电池电量下。
首先是最大性能下的Cinebench,然后是电池电量下。

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22 Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2569 (2512.4-2719.42)
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2490 (2422.04-2631.06)
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080) Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1879 (1859.17-2009.14)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2247 (2222.47-2257.72)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2788 (2732.8-2978.18)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
85 pt ∼85%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
75.5 pt ∼76%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
72.7 pt ∼73%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
69 pt ∼69%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
67 pt ∼67%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
66.4 pt ∼66%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
61.9 pt ∼62%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
54.6 pt ∼55%
Average of class Gaming
 
52.3 pt ∼52%
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
23124 Points ∼100% +35%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18870 (18654.1min - 18869.7max) Points ∼82% +10%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
17210 Points ∼74% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
17161 Points ∼74%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
16887 Points ∼73% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (7647 - 19064, n=11)
15608 Points ∼67% -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
14085 Points ∼61% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 23482, n=187, last 2 years)
12664 Points ∼55% -26%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
12253 Points ∼53% -29%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
1911 Points ∼100%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1907 Points ∼100% 0%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1905 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1720 - 1921, n=11)
1879 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
1825 Points ∼95% -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
1743 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1566 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 1936, n=186, last 2 years)
1518 Points ∼79% -21%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1516 Points ∼79% -21%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
8828 Points ∼100% +35%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
7169 Points ∼81% +10%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
6516 Points ∼74%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
6385 Points ∼72% -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
6352 Points ∼72% -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2922 - 7109, n=11)
5827 Points ∼66% -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5489 Points ∼62% -16%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
4647 Points ∼53% -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 9042, n=227, last 2 years)
4638 Points ∼53% -29%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
742 Points ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
737 Points ∼99%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
727 Points ∼98% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (664 - 738, n=11)
722 Points ∼97% -2%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
702 Points ∼95% -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
640 Points ∼86% -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
595 Points ∼80% -19%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
585 Points ∼79% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 745, n=227, last 2 years)
570 Points ∼77% -23%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
3562 Points ∼100% +31%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2918 (2849.61min - 2917.79max) Points ∼82% +7%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
2722 (1726.89min - 2722.38max) Points ∼76% 0%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
2605 (1656.04min - 2605.35max) Points ∼73% -4%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
2719 (2512.4min - 2719.42max) Points ∼76%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
2631 (2422.04min - 2631.06max) Points ∼74% -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1561 - 3077, n=11)
2574 Points ∼72% -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2292 Points ∼64% -16%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
2009 (1859.17min - 2009.14max) Points ∼56% -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 3652, n=232, last 2 years)
1961 Points ∼55% -28%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
280 Points ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
273 Points ∼98%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
272 Points ∼97% 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (245 - 277, n=11)
270 Points ∼96% -1%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
263 Points ∼94% -4%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
260 Points ∼93% -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
249 Points ∼89% -9%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
231 Points ∼83% -15%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points ∼82% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 282, n=222, last 2 years)
227 Points ∼81% -17%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (146.4 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years)
287 Seconds * ∼100% -51%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
271 Seconds * ∼94% -43%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
256 Seconds * ∼89% -35%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (173.7 - 415, n=11)
224 Seconds * ∼78% -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
220 Seconds * ∼77% -16%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
197.6 Seconds * ∼69% -4%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
189.9 Seconds * ∼66%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
173.6 Seconds * ∼60% +9%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
150.5 Seconds * ∼52% +21%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
86541 MIPS ∼100% +32%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
69146 MIPS ∼80% +5%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
65743 MIPS ∼76%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
64864 MIPS ∼75% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
64457 MIPS ∼74% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (37614 - 73489, n=11)
63005 MIPS ∼73% -4%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
53056 MIPS ∼61% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 88128, n=226, last 2 years)
51610 MIPS ∼60% -21%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
51421 MIPS ∼59% -22%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
6357 MIPS ∼100% +5%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
6041 MIPS ∼95%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5556 - 6120, n=11)
5939 MIPS ∼93% -2%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
5847 MIPS ∼92% -3%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
5803 MIPS ∼91% -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5727 MIPS ∼90% -5%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
5587 MIPS ∼88% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 6582, n=226, last 2 years)
5468 MIPS ∼86% -9%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
5138 MIPS ∼81% -15%
Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
16448 Points ∼100% +34%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13717 Points ∼83% +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
12463 Points ∼76% +2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (8519 - 14376, n=11)
12385 Points ∼75% +1%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
12261 Points ∼75%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
11748 Points ∼71% -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
10167 Points ∼62% -17%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
9380 Points ∼57% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 16925, n=221, last 2 years)
8903 Points ∼54% -27%
Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1949 Points ∼100% +5%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1878 Points ∼96% +1%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
1856 Points ∼95%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1770 - 1892, n=11)
1838 Points ∼94% -1%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
1755 Points ∼90% -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
1746 Points ∼90% -6%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1602 Points ∼82% -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1594 Points ∼82% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 1949, n=221, last 2 years)
1494 Points ∼77% -20%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
26 fps ∼100% +36%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
21.4 fps ∼82% +12%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
19.1 fps ∼73%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
18.5 fps ∼71% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
18 fps ∼69% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (9.16 - 22.5, n=11)
17.9 fps ∼69% -6%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
14.9 fps ∼57% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 26.6, n=230, last 2 years)
14.4 fps ∼55% -25%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
13.1 fps ∼50% -31%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 332, n=224, last 2 years)
52.5 s * ∼100% -36%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
48.7 s * ∼93% -26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
45 s * ∼86% -17%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
42.4 s * ∼81% -10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
41.7 s * ∼79% -8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (38.5 - 49.3, n=11)
41.5 s * ∼79% -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
40.7 s * ∼78% -6%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
38.5 s * ∼73%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
34.2 s * ∼65% +11%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.412 - 4.47, n=225, last 2 years)
0.555 sec * ∼100% -27%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.549 sec * ∼99% -26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.4799 sec * ∼86% -10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4671 sec * ∼84% -7%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4506 sec * ∼81% -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (0.4218 - 0.4754, n=11)
0.4372 sec * ∼79% -0%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.437 sec * ∼79%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4323 sec * ∼78% +1%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
0.4239 sec * ∼76% +3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2719 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
271 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
273 Points
Help
Performance Rating
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
98.6 pt ∼99%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
83.1 pt ∼83%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
69.4 pt ∼69%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65.4 pt ∼65%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62.6 pt ∼63%
Average of class Gaming
 
60.2 pt ∼60%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
58.5 pt ∼59%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
57.5 pt ∼58%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
56.5 pt ∼57%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
20004 KRay/s ∼100% +133%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
16852 KRay/s ∼84% +97%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
14463 KRay/s ∼72% +69%
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 22183, n=183, last 2 years)
11579 KRay/s ∼58% +35%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9759 KRay/s ∼49% +14%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9316 KRay/s ∼47% +9%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8660 KRay/s ∼43% +1%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
8573 KRay/s ∼43%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (4074 - 10077, n=11)
8003 KRay/s ∼40% -7%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
110093 Points ∼100% +187%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
103794 Points ∼94% +170%
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 117712, n=183, last 2 years)
62678 Points ∼57% +63%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
60967 Points ∼55% +59%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
43695 Points ∼40% +14%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
41656 Points ∼38% +8%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
39340 Points ∼36% +2%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
38396 Points ∼35%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (22307 - 43760, n=11)
37025 Points ∼34% -4%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5123 MB/s ∼100% +68%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
4109 MB/s ∼80% +35%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3547 MB/s ∼69% +17%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3504 MB/s ∼68% +15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3378 MB/s ∼66% +11%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3043 MB/s ∼59%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3034 MB/s ∼59% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 5123, n=183, last 2 years)
2930 MB/s ∼57% -4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1378 - 3570, n=11)
2827 MB/s ∼55% -7%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
107120 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
107024 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
104920 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
102056 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (78668 - 107024, n=11)
101029 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99311 Points ∼93% -7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
98781 Points ∼92% -8%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
91605 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 132615, n=183, last 2 years)
90696 Points ∼85% -15%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
12955 Points ∼100% +34%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
12924 Points ∼100% +33%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
10402 Points ∼80% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 17639, n=183, last 2 years)
10017 Points ∼77% +3%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9927 Points ∼77% +2%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
9775 Points ∼75% +1%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9703 Points ∼75% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9687 Points ∼75%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5709 - 10383, n=11)
9237 Points ∼71% -5%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57334 Points ∼100% +147%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
52105 Points ∼91% +125%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
36460 Points ∼64% +57%
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 64776, n=183, last 2 years)
34157 Points ∼60% +47%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
27285 Points ∼48% +18%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
25547 Points ∼45% +10%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
23537 Points ∼41% +2%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
23188 Points ∼40%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (11257 - 28598, n=11)
22003 Points ∼38% -5%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
183146 MB/s ∼100% +92%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
142475 MB/s ∼78% +50%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
139407 MB/s ∼76% +46%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
106367 MB/s ∼58% +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
102111 MB/s ∼56% +7%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
95195 MB/s ∼52%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
92739 MB/s ∼51% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (11368 - 183146, n=183, last 2 years)
82959 MB/s ∼45% -13%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (31935 - 107508, n=11)
80017 MB/s ∼44% -16%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1393 MB/s ∼100% +33%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1203 MB/s ∼86% +15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1143 MB/s ∼82% +9%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1048 MB/s ∼75%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1032 MB/s ∼74% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (507 - 1193, n=11)
982 MB/s ∼70% -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
890 MB/s ∼64% -15%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
773 MB/s ∼55% -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 1408, n=204, last 2 years)
721 MB/s ∼52% -31%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
10864 KRay/s ∼100% +120%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9001 KRay/s ∼83% +82%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
7830 KRay/s ∼72% +59%
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 11913, n=183, last 2 years)
6295 KRay/s ∼58% +27%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5748 KRay/s ∼53% +16%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5322 KRay/s ∼49% +8%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
4967 KRay/s ∼46% +1%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4940 KRay/s ∼45%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2235 - 6068, n=11)
4606 KRay/s ∼42% -7%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
47710 MPixel/s ∼100% +66%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
36231 MPixel/s ∼76% +26%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (27374 - 43917, n=11)
35990 MPixel/s ∼75% +25%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
34534 MPixel/s ∼72% +20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
29705 MPixel/s ∼62% +4%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
28692 MPixel/s ∼60%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
27526 MPixel/s ∼58% -4%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
26597 MPixel/s ∼56% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (8341 - 47710, n=183, last 2 years)
25617 MPixel/s ∼54% -11%

系统性能

XMG Pro 17在PCMark 10中排名很高。在这个非常现实的测试中,它的得分刚刚超过相同配置型号的平均分。MSI Raider GE77,在纸面上甚至更强大,但却落后12%。

这个结果可以在使用笔记本时得到验证。同时打开的程序的数量几乎是不相关的。总有足够的性能可用。

然而,最显著的事实是,静音模式下的速率就足以达到相同的分数。这意味着,用户不必为了顺利使用笔记本电脑而忍受一个响亮的风扇或一个过于温暖的箱子。此外,在这种模式下,游戏FPS只下降了大约10%到20%。

申克公司决定不使用DDR5内存,这对系统性能有一定的影响。其主要原因是模块的价格较低,而与DDR4相比,预期的改进在几个百分点之间。

性能模式下的PCMark 10
性能模式下的PCMark 10
静音模式下的PCMark 10
静音模式下的PCMark 10
电池供电的PCMark 10
电池供电的PCMark 10
PCMark 10 / Score
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
8186 Points ∼100% +5%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7812 Points ∼95%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7139 - 8083, n=4)
7729 Points ∼94% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7539 Points ∼92% -3%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
7458 Points ∼91% -5%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6996 Points ∼85% -10%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6993 Points ∼85% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (4077 - 8426, n=186, last 2 years)
6697 Points ∼82% -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
6351 Points ∼78% -19%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
11205 Points ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10814 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10254 - 11019, n=4)
10735 Points ∼96% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10715 Points ∼96% -1%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
10351 Points ∼92% -4%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10024 Points ∼89% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (7148 - 11205, n=185, last 2 years)
9935 Points ∼89% -8%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9761 Points ∼87% -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
9374 Points ∼84% -13%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10197 Points ∼100%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
10144 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9102 - 11186, n=4)
10069 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
9879 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9682 Points ∼95% -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
9613 Points ∼94% -6%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9126 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (6161 - 10785, n=185, last 2 years)
8898 Points ∼87% -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
7704 Points ∼76% -24%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
13098 Points ∼100% +12%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
11732 Points ∼90%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10578 - 12511, n=4)
11612 Points ∼89% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
11293 Points ∼86% -4%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
11007 Points ∼84% -6%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10160 Points ∼78% -13%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9822 Points ∼75% -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
9626 Points ∼73% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (3670 - 13707, n=185, last 2 years)
9328 Points ∼71% -20%
CrossMark / Overall
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2169 Points ∼100%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
1942 Points ∼90%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1903 Points ∼88%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1861 Points ∼86%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
1792 Points ∼83%
Average of class Gaming
  (974 - 2170, n=43, last 2 years)
1791 Points ∼83%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1711 Points ∼79%
CrossMark / Productivity
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2047 Points ∼100%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
1902 Points ∼93%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1808 Points ∼88%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1786 Points ∼87%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
1745 Points ∼85%
Average of class Gaming
  (907 - 2062, n=43, last 2 years)
1730 Points ∼85%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1698 Points ∼83%
CrossMark / Creativity
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2328 Points ∼100%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
2095 Points ∼90%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1936 Points ∼83%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
1921 Points ∼83%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
1893 Points ∼81%
Average of class Gaming
  (1027 - 2366, n=43, last 2 years)
1888 Points ∼81%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1724 Points ∼74%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
2137 Points ∼100%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2090 Points ∼98%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1868 Points ∼87%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1715 Points ∼80%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 2230, n=43, last 2 years)
1711 Points ∼80%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1666 Points ∼78%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
1643 Points ∼77%
PCMark 10 Score
7812 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
70863 MB/s ∼100% +50%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
60342 MB/s ∼85% +28%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (45395 - 74264, n=11)
57486 MB/s ∼81% +22%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53861 MB/s ∼76% +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53162 MB/s ∼75% +12%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
47304 MB/s ∼67% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
47278 MB/s ∼67%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
46035 MB/s ∼65% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (18074 - 77803, n=183, last 2 years)
44703 MB/s ∼63% -5%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
72930 MB/s ∼100% +58%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
67695 MB/s ∼93% +47%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (46179 - 69882, n=11)
59957 MB/s ∼82% +30%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57237 MB/s ∼78% +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53321 MB/s ∼73% +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (20318 - 76185, n=183, last 2 years)
48413 MB/s ∼66% +5%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
47698 MB/s ∼65% +3%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
47675 MB/s ∼65% +3%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
46179 MB/s ∼63%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
67353 MB/s ∼100% +44%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (46677 - 65518, n=11)
58494 MB/s ∼87% +25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57180 MB/s ∼85% +23%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
54443 MB/s ∼81% +17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
51577 MB/s ∼77% +10%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
47383 MB/s ∼70% +2%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
46677 MB/s ∼69%
Average of class Gaming
  (15975 - 68782, n=183, last 2 years)
46378 MB/s ∼69% -1%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
46176 MB/s ∼69% -1%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
120.6 ns * ∼100% -32%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
98.4 ns * ∼82% -8%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
95.7 ns * ∼79% -5%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
92.3 ns * ∼77% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.3 ns * ∼77% -1%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
91.2 ns * ∼76%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
83.9 ns * ∼70% +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (0 - 122, n=206, last 2 years)
61.4 ns * ∼51% +33%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (91.2 - 106, n=11)
61 (91.2min - 106max) ns * ∼51% +33%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

与竞争对手相比,Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22在DPC延迟方面的得分相当合格。然而,这还不足以进行现场音频编辑,例如,即使最高中断值保持在千分之一秒以下。电源管理和DirectX驱动导致最长的停顿。

YouTube 4K视频的播放也不完全完美。那9个掉帧--如截图所见--并不多。然而,一个游戏工作站应该能够做得更好。

流媒体视频时的CPU和GPU负载
流媒体视频时的CPU和GPU负载
LatencyMon主页
LatencyMon主页
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2127.9 μs * ∼100% -136%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1684.6 μs * ∼79% -87%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1259 μs * ∼59% -39%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1101.9 μs * ∼52% -22%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
903 μs * ∼42%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
624 μs * ∼29% +31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
521.5 μs * ∼25% +42%

* ... smaller is better

储存

内置的三星SSD 980 Pro提供了预期的速率。至少在连续读取时,它达到了PCIe 4.0所允许的传输速率。然而,在长时间的负载过程中,散热的缺乏变得很明显。这只有在传输大量数据时才是决定性的因素,而在日常使用中几乎不起作用。

尽管如此, Acer Predator Triton 500 SE就证明了固态硬盘的性能并不一定要下降。

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Sequential Read: 4559MB/s
Sequential Write: 3548MB/s
4K Read: 63.1MB/s
4K Write: 254.1MB/s
4K-64 Read: 2757MB/s
4K-64 Write: 3543MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.073ms
Access Time Write: 0.018ms
Score Read: 3276Points
Score Write: 4151Points
Score Total: 9047Points
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Drive Performance Rating
Percent
73.4
78.5
7%
67.3
-8%
76.7
4%
75.9
3%
60
-18%
60.8
-17%
66.4
-10%
48.6
-34%
DiskSpd
5%
-5%
3%
34%
-20%
9%
-6%
-33%
seq read
3141
3713
18%
3595
14%
4285
36%
4903
56%
2031
-35%
4931
57%
3867 ?(2659 - 4315, n=17)
23%
2515 ?(170 - 5544, n=180, last 2 years)
-20%
seq write
3391
3706
9%
4599
36%
4325
28%
7889
133%
3365
-1%
4819
42%
3906 ?(2839 - 4360, n=17)
15%
2731 ?(174 - 7889, n=179, last 2 years)
-19%
seq q8 t1 read
6766
6695
-1%
6499
-4%
6666
-1%
10557
56%
3372
-50%
13195
95%
6452 ?(3227 - 6902, n=17)
-5%
4186 ?(144 - 13195, n=180, last 2 years)
-38%
seq q8 t1 write
4993
4959
-1%
4765
-5%
5006
0%
9830
97%
3390
-32%
8227
65%
4816 ?(3184 - 5028, n=17)
-4%
3285 ?(86.2 - 10203, n=180, last 2 years)
-34%
4k q1 t1 read
67.2
83
24%
70.3
5%
93.6
39%
73.1
9%
70.9
6%
79.3
18%
82 ?(62.7 - 94.3, n=17)
22%
58.6 ?(0.53 - 97.4, n=180, last 2 years)
-13%
4k q1 t1 write
279
286
3%
222
-20%
248
-11%
359
29%
403
44%
170.2
-39%
224 ?(152.9 - 279, n=17)
-20%
180.3 ?(0.79 - 421, n=179, last 2 years)
-35%
4k q32 t16 read
4260
4075
-4%
2750
-35%
4198
-1%
2390
-44%
1849
-57%
874
-79%
3089 ?(926 - 4260, n=17)
-27%
1932 ?(1.1 - 4260, n=179, last 2 years)
-55%
4k q32 t16 write
3961
3503
-12%
2786
-30%
1225
-69%
1542
-61%
2571
-35%
461
-88%
2075 ?(358 - 3961, n=17)
-48%
1871 ?(1.15 - 4249, n=179, last 2 years)
-53%
AS SSD
9%
-14%
8%
5%
-85%
-39%
-16%
-49%
Score Total
9047
8951
-1%
7009
-23%
9011
0%
6635
-27%
7793
-14%
4941
-45%
7313 ?(5629 - 9047, n=16)
-19%
5524 ?(910 - 9279, n=171, last 2 years)
-39%
Score Read
3276
3399
4%
2709
-17%
3372
3%
2619
-20%
2741
-16%
1948
-41%
2821 ?(1501 - 3512, n=16)
-14%
2069 ?(389 - 3629, n=171, last 2 years)
-37%
Score Write
4151
3882
-6%
2930
-29%
3980
-4%
2556
-38%
3640
-12%
2137
-49%
3123 ?(1412 - 4151, n=16)
-25%
2422 ?(335 - 4414, n=171, last 2 years)
-42%
Seq Read
4559
5053.82
11%
4531.51
-1%
5315
17%
5344.88
17%
3061.5
-33%
6561.69
44%
4670 ?(545 - 5692, n=16)
2%
3452 ?(252 - 9681, n=171, last 2 years)
-24%
Seq Write
3548
3628.78
2%
4186.78
18%
3920
10%
7663.27
116%
3002.92
-15%
3480.87
-2%
3434 ?(1613 - 4052, n=16)
-3%
2631 ?(308 - 8206, n=171, last 2 years)
-26%
4K Read
63.1
82.47
31%
64.38
2%
86.2
37%
68.93
9%
89.53
42%
69.21
10%
72 ?(53.5 - 86.8, n=16)
14%
57.1 ?(20 - 108, n=171, last 2 years)
-10%
4K Write
254.1
247.61
-3%
212.27
-16%
220.6
-13%
328.69
29%
339.58
34%
184.49
-27%
196.9 ?(134.6 - 254, n=16)
-23%
158.1 ?(18 - 364, n=171, last 2 years)
-38%
4K-64 Read
2757
2811.14
2%
2191.95
-20%
2754
0%
2015.68
-27%
2345.25
-15%
1223.07
-56%
2251 ?(923 - 2938, n=16)
-18%
1666 ?(216 - 2963, n=171, last 2 years)
-40%
4K-64 Write
3543
3271.86
-8%
2298.82
-35%
3367
-5%
1460.96
-59%
2999.99
-15%
1604.89
-55%
2583 ?(811 - 3708, n=16)
-27%
2012 ?(191.8 - 3859, n=171, last 2 years)
-43%
Access Time Read *
0.073
0.03
59%
0.034
53%
0.053
27%
0.07
4%
0.03
59%
0.04263 ?(0.022 - 0.073, n=16)
42%
0.06274 ?(0.018 - 0.23, n=164, last 2 years)
14%
Access Time Write *
0.018
0.017
6%
0.022
-22%
0.019
-6%
0.013
28%
0.18
-900%
0.066
-267%
0.036 ?(0.018 - 0.089, n=16)
-100%
0.06408 ?(0.012 - 0.588, n=171, last 2 years)
-256%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
7% / 7%
-9% / -10%
5% / 6%
14% / 17%
-41% / -56%
-16% / -19%
-11% / -11%
-39% / -42%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

03306609901320165019802310264029703300363039604290462049505280561059406270Tooltip
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW: Ø5166 (1248.02-6466.22)
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH: Ø6407 (5705.51-6545.21)

图形卡

Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Time Spy
Time Spy

我们审查的Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22配备了NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti,有16GB的VRAM。它是实现最高图形性能的理想选择。即使是在分辨率高于QHD的外部显示器上运行的最新游戏,也不应该对该GPU构成任何问题。

同时,当涉及到性能时,其功耗是至关重要的,而这又与笔记本电脑的冷却能力有关。155瓦(包括25瓦的Boost)至少是一个高于平均水平的数值,它将XMG Pro推到了我们排名的首位。虽然MSI Raider GE77Alienware x17 R2 P48E在3DMark基准测试中表现更好,但它们都消耗了175瓦的最大功率。另一方面,积分的差异仍然要小得多,这意味着申克笔记本电脑绝对可以从其耗电量中吸取更多的性能。

我们的GPU基准测试文章提供了关于各种显卡性能的概述。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
99.4 pt ∼99%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
95.2 pt ∼95%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
91.9 pt ∼92%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
88.2 pt ∼88%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
86.3 pt ∼86%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
77.9 pt ∼78%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
77.4 pt ∼77%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
70.8 pt ∼71%
Average of class Gaming
 
70 pt ∼70%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
44393 Points ∼100% +10%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
44381 Points ∼100% +10%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
40435 Points ∼91%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
40257 Points ∼91% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (13920 - 45050, n=35)
38378 Points ∼86% -5%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
37779 Points ∼85% -7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
37288 Points ∼84% -8%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
34598 Points ∼78% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1925 - 45050, n=214, last 2 years)
30794 Points ∼69% -24%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
154082 Points ∼100%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
150156 Points ∼97% -3%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
144426 Points ∼94% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (73574 - 192520, n=21)
141523 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
116343 Points ∼76% -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (16443 - 192950, n=166, last 2 years)
113247 Points ∼73% -27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
79498 Points ∼52% -48%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
58097 Points ∼38% -62%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
32849 Points ∼100% +6%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
31732 Points ∼97% +3%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
30933 Points ∼94%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6928 - 34174, n=35)
28881 Points ∼88% -7%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
28036 Points ∼85% -9%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
28006 Points ∼85% -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
27562 Points ∼84% -11%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
26774 Points ∼82% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (1360 - 34993, n=231, last 2 years)
23121 Points ∼70% -25%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
13455 Points ∼100% +5%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
12865 Points ∼96% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
12838 Points ∼95%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (4921 - 13455, n=35)
11654 Points ∼87% -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
11227 Points ∼83% -13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
11076 Points ∼82% -14%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
10098 Points ∼75% -21%
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
9980 Points ∼74% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (429 - 13455, n=233, last 2 years)
8959 Points ∼67% -30%
3DMark 11 Performance
32392 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
55629 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
26009 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
12314 points
Help