结论 - 联想 Idea Tab Plus
联想 IdeaTab Plus 具有很高的性价比,不仅对于寻求带触控笔的经济型平板电脑的学生来说,它也是一款值得推荐的产品。
这款 12.1 英寸的Android 平板电脑售价约为 290 美元,拥有坚固耐用的高品质金属外壳、256 GB 存储空间和最高 2 TB 的 microSD 支持。它还配备了明亮、色彩准确的 90 Hz IPS 显示屏、良好的扬声器和较长的电池续航时间。该平板电脑还能以高达 45 瓦的功率快速充电。
IdeaTab Plus 配备了 Dimensity 6400 处理器,虽然速度不是特别快,但性能却很稳定。不过,这并不能使这款 12.1 英寸的设备真正适用于游戏。
同样令人遗憾的是,联想没有在中国提供蜂窝版平板电脑,Wi-Fi 5 成为上网的唯一选择。与竞争对手相比,更新周期也很短。
Pros
Cons
Table of Contents
- 结论 - 联想 Idea Tab Plus
- 规格
- 外壳 - 联想 Idea Tab Plus 采用哑光金属外壳
- 功能 - 带有键盘接口的 Wi-Fi 平板电脑
- 软件 - 许多人工智能工具,但更新仅限于Android 17
- 通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Idea Tab Plus 配备了 WiFi 5 和良好的全球定位系统。
- 摄像头 - 1300 万像素 + 800 万像素快照功能
- 附件和保修 - 包括手写笔
- 输入设备和操作 - 联想平板电脑没有指纹传感器
- 显示屏 - 无 PWM 的明亮 IPS 显示屏
- 性能 - Idea Tab Plus 配备联发科 Dimensity 6400 芯片
- Emissions - 出色的联想平板电脑
- 电池运行时间 - 45 瓦充电
- Notebookcheck 总体评分
- 可能的替代品比较
通过 Idea Tab Pro,联想展示了 Idea Tab更大、更快的兄弟。我们的 12.1 英寸评测设备肩负着教育使命:联想 IdeaTab Pro 的主要目标用户是学生,他们正在寻找一款适合大学日常使用的实用平板电脑。
它配备了一支手写笔,还有各种辅助学习的人工智能工具。
规格
外壳 - 联想 Idea Tab Plus 采用哑光金属外壳
联想 IdeaTab Plus 采用坚固的铝制外壳,触感优质,重量仅为 530 克,对于 12 英寸平板电脑来说相对较轻。它非常适合在干燥的环境中使用,因为其 IP52 认证只能提供有限的防尘保护,在需要维修之前最多只能承受几滴水。
平板电脑的显示屏边框约为 7 毫米,非常薄,给人一种现代感。自拍摄像头安装在边框内,以节省空间,而主摄像头则位于玻璃盖板下方,略微突出于约 6.5 毫米薄的后盖,最大高度增至约 8.5 毫米。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
功能 - 带有键盘接口的 Wi-Fi 平板电脑
microSD 读卡器
该读卡器与 Angelbird V60 基准 microSD 卡配合使用,可实现高于平均水平的传输速度。该平板电脑支持最大 2 TB 的卡。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus (Angelbird V60) | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Tablet (10.2 - 57.4, n=61, last 2 years) |
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
软件 - 许多人工智能工具,但更新仅限于Android 17
可持续性
欧盟EPREL 标签将联想平板电脑的可维修性评为最高级别的 "A"。IdeaTab Plus 的包装没有采用任何塑料包装,而是用回收纸板制成。
联想尚未披露其平板电脑的碳足迹或所使用的可回收材料。制造商在其网站上提供了产品维修说明。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Idea Tab Plus 配备了 WiFi 5 和良好的全球定位系统。
IdeaTab Plus 采用 Wi-Fi 5,依赖于相对较慢的 Wi-Fi 标准。
与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器连接后,数据传输速度虽然稳定,但最高只能达到 327 Mbps,落后于许多竞争对手。
Networking | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Average of class Tablet | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
摄像头 - 1300 万像素 + 800 万像素快照功能
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Daylight imageDaylight imageLowlight image

附件和保修 - 包括手写笔
联想目前销售的 IdeaTab Plus 总是与触控笔捆绑销售(零售价 289 美元)。在欧盟,两种捆绑销售方式都提供 24 个月的保修服务。
另外,更好的联想 Tab Pen Plus触控笔目前在亚马逊有售,价格约为 49 美元。
我们的评测设备附带了触控笔、USB-C 数据线、SIM 卡工具和快速入门指南。
输入设备和操作 - 联想平板电脑没有指纹传感器
显示屏 - 无 PWM 的明亮 IPS 显示屏
|
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 633 cd/m²
Contrast: 1172:1 (Black: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.81 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.8}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.934
CCT: 6853 K
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus IPS, 2560x1600, 12.1" | Lenovo Idea Tab Pro IPS, 2944x1840, 12.7" | Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro IPS, 2944x1840, 12.7" | Teclast Art Pad Pro IPS, 2176x1600, 12.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro IPS, 2560x1600, 12.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -44% | -40% | -116% | -36% | |
Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 633 | 409 -35% | 413 -35% | 291 -54% | 513 -19% |
Brightness (cd/m²) | 622 | 388 -38% | 394 -37% | 269 -57% | 480 -23% |
Brightness Distribution (%) | 95 | 89 -6% | 89 -6% | 82 -14% | 86 -9% |
Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.54 | 0.4 26% | 0.45 17% | 0.33 39% | 0.4 26% |
Contrast (:1) | 1172 | 1023 -13% | 918 -22% | 882 -25% | 1283 9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.81 | 3.46 -91% | 2.85 -57% | 7.79 -330% | 2.82 -56% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.98 | 5.46 -83% | 6.16 -107% | 10.97 -268% | 8.83 -196% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 5.2 -108% | 4.3 -72% | 8 -220% | 2.9 -16% |
Gamma | 1.934 114% | 2.106 104% | 2.239 98% | 2.007 110% | 2.265 97% |
CCT | 6853 95% | 5823 112% | 7476 87% | 8922 73% | 7189 90% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8169 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
14.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.8 ms rise | |
↘ 4.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
22.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.5 ms rise | |
↘ 6.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). |
性能 - Idea Tab Plus 配备联发科 Dimensity 6400 芯片
Das Idea Tab Plus 采用了联发科 Dimensity 6400 处理器,就性能而言,属于中低端产品。
联想平板电脑采用 ARM 处理器,其集成的 Mali G57 MC2ARM GPU,可流畅运行学习、流媒体和上网等标准应用。另一方面,游戏只能在中低细节水平下运行,否则就会出现卡顿。
IdeaTab Plus 的性能与竞争对手相比并不理想。除了 Teclast Art Pad Pro之外,许多其他同价位平板电脑的性能都要好得多。
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Average of class Tablet (2597 - 76843, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus | |
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (n=1) |
AImark - Score v3.x | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Average of class Tablet (138 - 55794, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus | |
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (n=1) |
Geekbench AI | |
Single Precision NPU 1.5 | |
Average of class Tablet (166 - 1483, n=22, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus | |
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (n=1) | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
Half Precision NPU 1.5 | |
Average of class Tablet (154 - 9666, n=22, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus | |
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (n=1) | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
Quantized NPU 1.5 | |
Average of class Tablet (88 - 13178, n=22, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus | |
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (n=1) | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro |
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (22.3 - 393, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus (Chrome 140.0.7339.155) | |
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (n=1) | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro (Chrome 138.0.7204.179) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 603, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro (Chrome 138.0.7204.179) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus (Chrome 140.0.7339.155) | |
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (n=1) |
Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0 | |
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 36.8, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128) | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro (Chrome 138.0.7204.179) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus (Chrome 140.0.7339.155) | |
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (n=1) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Average of class Tablet (26 - 315, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus (Chrome 140.0.7339.155) | |
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (n=1) | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro (Chrome 138.0.7204.179) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro (Chrome 139) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=103, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus (Chrome 140.0.7339.155) | |
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (n=1) | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro (Chrome 138.0.7204.179) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 27101, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro (Chrome 138.0.7204.179) | |
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (n=1) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus (Chrome 140.0.7339.155) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132) |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus | Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro | Teclast Art Pad Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 329% | 135% | 29% | 12% | 20% | 71% | |
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 526.82 | 3648.3 593% | 2123 303% | 1007.37 91% | 844.9 60% | 916 ? 74% | 1562 ? 196% |
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 527.26 | 3298.5 526% | 1745 231% | 873.36 66% | 705.3 34% | 732 ? 39% | 1154 ? 119% |
Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 271.5 | 474.4 75% | 244 -10% | 237.46 -13% | 215.5 -21% | 231 ? -15% | 228 ? -16% |
Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 304.01 | 668 120% | 352 16% | 215.52 -29% | 231.4 -24% | 249 ? -18% | 257 ? -15% |
Emissions - 出色的联想平板电脑
温度
无论我们对它的 CPU 和 GPU 进行何种负载测试,联想平板电脑都丝毫不受影响。即使在进行了一个小时的 "Burnout "基准压力测试后,IdeaTab Plus 的触感也没有发热。正如 3DMark 压力测试所示,在满载情况下,性能几乎没有下降。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark 压力测试
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro |
发言人
联想的 12.1 英寸平板电脑配备了四个扬声器,支持杜比全景声(Dolby Atmos),音量高达 84 分贝(A)。声音非常出色,虽然有些高亢,但也能听到较低的频率。
外部音频设备可通过 USB-C 和蓝牙连接。支持许多重要的蓝牙编解码器,包括 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC、LC3 和 Opus。
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池运行时间 - 45 瓦充电
耗电量
说到充电,耐心往往是廉价平板电脑的关键。IdeaTab Plus 则不然,因为它的 10,200 毫安时电池充电功率高达 45 瓦。这意味着在我们的测试中,一个完整的充电周期只用了 1 小时 21 分钟(Anker 317 充电器,100 瓦)。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus 10200 mAh | Lenovo Idea Tab Pro 10200 mAh | Teclast Art Pad Pro 10000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 10000 mAh | Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -10% | -135% | -21% | 6% | -57% | |
Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.9 | 1.2 37% | 5.6 -195% | 1.7 11% | 1.395 ? 27% | 1.983 ? -4% |
Idle Average * (Watt) | 2.1 | 1.8 14% | 6.1 -190% | 2.2 -5% | 2.13 ? -1% | 3.85 ? -83% |
Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 2.4 | 2.8 -17% | 6.4 -167% | 2.9 -21% | 2.3 ? 4% | 4.19 ? -75% |
Load Average * (Watt) | 5.9 | 7.9 -34% | 10 -69% | 5.8 2% | 5.9 ? -0% | 8.93 ? -51% |
Load Maximum * (Watt) | 7.3 | 10.8 -48% | 11.2 -53% | 13.9 -90% | 7.3 ? -0% | 12.7 ? -74% |
* ... smaller is better
耗电量:Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
功耗:GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
IdeaTab Plus 的电池续航时间同样出色,为其出色的性能锦上添花。在我们的实际 Wi-Fi 测试中,它的续航时间接近 15 小时,这意味着它超越了所有对比设备,除了 小米红米 Pad Pro.
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus 10200 mAh | Lenovo Idea Tab Pro 10200 mAh | Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro 10200 mAh | Teclast Art Pad Pro 10000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 10000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery runtime | -11% | -12% | -32% | 3% | |
WiFi v1.3 (h) | 14.9 | 13.3 -11% | 13.1 -12% | 10.1 -32% | 15.4 3% |
Reader / Idle (h) | 25.4 | 37.3 | |||
H.264 (h) | 17 | 17.5 | |||
Load (h) | 4.3 | 4.1 |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
联想 IdeaTab Plus 以相对较低的价格提供了包括手写笔在内的多种功能。然而,性能却大打折扣,12.1 英寸的平板电脑只能以 Wi-Fi 5 的速度运行。

Lenovo Idea Tab Plus
- 10/14/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mediatek Dimensity 6400 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $224.99 Lenovo Idea Tab Plus - Light... 2. $359.79 Lenovo Idea Tab Pro with Goo... 3. $169.99 Lenovo Idea Tab - College Ta... List Price: 299 Euro | 530 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 12.10" 2560x1600 249 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $359.79 Lenovo Idea Tab Pro with Goo... 2. $308.99 Lenovo Idea Tab Pro, 12.7" 3... 3. $319.99 Lenovo Idea Tab Pro TB373FU ... List Price: 379€ | 620 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 12.70" 2944x1840 273 PPI IPS | |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB | Amazon: 1. $18.79 Case for Motorola Moto Pad 6... 2. $12.98 Case for Motorola Moto Pad 6... 3. $19.49 Case for Motorola Moto Pad 6... List Price: 310€ | 620 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 12.70" 2944x1840 273 PPI IPS | |
Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $19.49 Case for TECLAST ArtPad Pro ... 2. $18.98 NOUKAJU [3pack] Screen Prote... 3. $16.98 NOUKAJU [3 Pack] Screen Prot... List Price: 350 Euro | 674 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 12.70" 2176x1600 213 PPI IPS | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: $289.00 List Price: 380€ | 571 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 12.10" 2560x1600 249 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.