Oppo Pad Air平板电脑评测 - 良好的扬声器和充足的电池
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83.1 % | 01/2023 | Oppo Pad Air SD 680, Adreno 610 | 440 g | 6.9 mm | 10.36" | 2000x1200 | |
81.2 % | 01/2023 | Huawei MatePad SE SD 680, Adreno 610 | 440 g | 7.9 mm | 10.40" | 2000x1200 | |
81.7 % | 11/2022 | Honor Pad 8 SD 680, Adreno 610 | 520 g | 6.9 mm | 12.00" | 2000x1200 | |
84.6 % | 12/2022 | Xiaomi Redmi Pad Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2 | 445 g | 7.05 mm | 10.61" | 2000x1200 | |
81 % | 02/2022 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 T618, Mali-G52 MP2 | 508 g | 6.9 mm | 10.50" | 1920x1200 |
外壳和功能 - 纤细和轻巧
通过Pad Air,Oppo带来了一款拥有10.36英寸屏幕的轻型平板电脑,它不是最便宜的设备之一,但它看起来也非常别致。
一条塑料条横跨背面的外壳边缘,由于其图案让人想起树皮或波浪。一方面,这条塑料条确保了更好的第一印象,因为背面的其他部分是由金属制成的。另一方面,它的光泽效果与外壳的其他部分不同,因此是一个视觉亮点。
这款平板电脑相当轻,只有440克,而且轮廓非常纤细,只有6.9毫米。不过,这个棱角分明的外壳拿在手里感觉很好。屏幕的边缘是通常的大小,所以你可以握住平板电脑而不会无意中触发触摸屏上的指令。
稳定性很好,但平板电脑在某些地方会被压住并轻微扭曲。
奥普提供了两种存储变体的平板电脑。
- 4GB内存/64GB大容量存储。300欧元
- 4GB内存/128GB大容量存储。350欧元
没有LTE变体,也没有用于移动支付的NFC模块。
然而,存储空间可以通过microSD插槽扩展。在我们使用Angelbird V60参考卡的基准测试中,读取率反复下降,但该阅读器在其他方面提供了良好的传输率。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Oppo Pad Air (Angelbird V60) | |
Huawei MatePad SE (Angelbird V60) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通讯、软件和操作 - 人脸识别的问题
由于有了WiFi 5,Oppo Pad Air可以相当迅速地浏览WLAN。然而,在我们用参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000进行的测试中,我们注意到该平板电脑在接收方向上比竞争对手要慢一些,而传输方面的问题较少。
WLAN模块的接收在路由器附近是完美的,在10米的距离和穿过3堵墙时,它的信号强度仍然是50%。互联网页面在那里的加载速度也相当快,所以你不必为Pad Air在家里到处安装WLAN中继器。
Oppo的ColorOS 12.1是基于Android 12。在测试时,这款平板电脑仍然合理地更新了2022年12月的安全补丁。奥普已经承诺了很长时间的更新,但只针对某些型号。Pad Air将被更新多长时间还有待观察。至少计划在2013年上半年更新到Android 13。
由于120赫兹,触摸屏的反应非常灵敏,可以精确地使用到角落。
该平板电脑没有用于生物识别解锁的指纹传感器。然而,可以使用面部识别。这并不是很好的工作。你必须把你的脸靠近平板电脑,但即使这样也不能可靠地识别。由于缺乏额外的硬件,这种方法也不是很安全。
Networking | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Honor Pad 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Honor Pad 8 | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 |
照相机 - 你可以拍摄照片...
与大多数平板电脑一样,相机设备也相当简单。背面有一个海力士的800万像素传感器。它拍摄的照片有些暗淡,不是很详细,在黑暗或非常明亮的地方也很明显缺乏动态。 在放大的情况下,由于镜头的保护玻璃不均匀,图片质量很差。
在光线很弱、对比度很高的情况下,效果也相当平庸;至少你可以在照片中认出一些东西。然而,许多地方看起来像素很高,动态效果也很不理想。
视频可以在1080p和最多30帧的情况下录制。自动对焦在这里有延迟,而且在光线较弱的情况下颜色也会丢失。
前置摄像头的分辨率为500万像素。在光线良好的情况下,它可以拍出可用的自拍,但它显示了放大后显示的细节有多粗糙。在黑暗区域也缺乏细节。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow Light显示 - 不同的亮度
Oppo指定360尼特为Pad Air显示屏的最大亮度。我们的测量结果略低于此,Oppo Pad Air也是对比领域中屏幕最暗的平板电脑。亮度足够在客厅里使用,但在户外很快就会出现反光问题。
作为回报,该面板的最大帧率为120赫兹,这是所有竞争对手都无法声称的。因此,滚动更顺畅,平板电脑的反应能力也更强。
对比度相当低,不应期待Oppo Pad Air的显示屏有明亮的色彩。在详细的测量中,肉眼也可以看到明亮的灰度中的偏蓝。特别是明亮的橙色调强烈地偏离了色彩空间的最佳状态。
在我们的测量中,我们没有检测到显示器的PWM。
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 352 cd/m²
Contrast: 782:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.79 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.118
Oppo Pad Air IPS, 2000x1200, 10.36 | Huawei MatePad SE IPS, 2000x1200, 10.40 | Honor Pad 8 IPS, 2000x1200, 12.00 | Xiaomi Redmi Pad IPS, 2000x1200, 10.61 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.50 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 23% | 11% | 37% | -20% | |
Brightness middle | 352 | 398 13% | 379 8% | 418 19% | 368 5% |
Brightness | 339 | 368 9% | 382 13% | 402 19% | 346 2% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 87 2% | 84 -1% | 90 6% | 91 7% |
Black Level * | 0.45 | 0.46 -2% | 0.3 33% | 0.28 38% | 0.61 -36% |
Contrast | 782 | 865 11% | 1263 62% | 1493 91% | 603 -23% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.79 | 2.17 55% | 4.76 1% | 2.3 52% | 6.9 -44% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.65 | 4.32 50% | 9.25 -7% | 5.4 38% | 11.4 -32% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 3.1 44% | 6.7 -22% | 3.7 33% | 7.7 -40% |
Gamma | 2.118 104% | 2.214 99% | 2.234 98% | 2.21 100% | 2.16 102% |
CCT | 7889 82% | 7245 90% | 8468 77% | 6595 99% | 8547 76% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
25.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.4 ms rise | |
↘ 11.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
42.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.7 ms rise | |
↘ 19 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 良好的运行时间
随着 高通Snapdragon 680oppo公司选择了一种经常用于价格较低的平板电脑的SoC:例如 华为MatePad SE或 Honor Pad 8.
它为大部分流畅的系统操作提供了足够的性能,但你不应该期待更高的要求,多任务处理也可能是一个问题,这取决于使用的应用程序。 小米的红米Pad提供了相当多的动力。
尽管有120赫兹的屏幕,但要求高的游戏玩家可能不得不另寻他处;SoC的功率不足以满足许多移动游戏的高设置。
OPPO可以在内存方面得分:制造商安装了UFS 2.2闪存,而不是缓慢的eMMC,从而使华为和三星的平板电脑退居次席。这缩短了加载时间,加快了数据传输速度。
我们注意到,在温度测量中,即使在较长的负载下,平板电脑也几乎没有升温。此外,即使在多次基准运行后,SoC仍然保持其性能。
我们喜欢扬声器的声音,它不会过度膨胀,还集成了较低的中音。那些仍然喜欢连接耳机或外部扬声器的人可以通过USB-C或蓝牙来实现。无线编解码器是aptX、aptX HD、SBC、AAC和LDAC。
在电池寿命方面,这款轻便的平板电脑以其相当高容量的电池而令人信服,在我们的WLAN测试中,它的电池寿命达到13:43小时。小米 小米红米Pad仍然可以做得更好,但Oppo Pad Air总体上非常适用于日常使用,在不插电的情况下绝对可以维持一天的高强度使用。
如果你确实要给它充电,你可以用高达18瓦的功率来做。电池需要大约3个小时,直到再次充满电。
PCMark for Android: Work 3.0
3DMark: Wild Life Score | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
GFXBench: 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Octane V2: Total Score
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Honor Pad 8 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (323 - 384, n=14) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1287 - 1738, n=14) | |
Honor Pad 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 |
PCMark for Android / Work 3.0 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Honor Pad 8 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4535 - 8730, n=14) | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Huawei MatePad SE |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Average of class Tablet (286 - 7933, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (437 - 589, n=14) | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Honor Pad 8 | |
Huawei MatePad SE |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Average of class Tablet (289 - 25317, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (417 - 574, n=14) | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Honor Pad 8 | |
Huawei MatePad SE |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Average of class Tablet (75 - 6919, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Honor Pad 8 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (22 - 130, n=15) |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Average of class Tablet (72 - 6909, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (112 - 130, n=13) | |
Honor Pad 8 | |
Huawei MatePad SE |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Average of class Tablet (267 - 14235, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Honor Pad 8 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (267 - 1429, n=14) |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Average of class Tablet (240 - 24605, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Honor Pad 8 | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (240 - 1309, n=14) |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Average of class Tablet (441 - 5751, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Honor Pad 8 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (441 - 2853, n=14) |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Average of class Tablet (615 - 4741, n=50, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1234 - 1406, n=13) | |
Honor Pad 8 | |
Huawei MatePad SE |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Average of class Tablet (521 - 5731, n=50, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1087 - 1276, n=13) | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Honor Pad 8 | |
Huawei MatePad SE |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Average of class Tablet (1671 - 3199, n=50, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2185 - 2576, n=13) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Honor Pad 8 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Average of class Tablet (361 - 14235, n=51, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1231 - 1441, n=13) | |
Honor Pad 8 | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Huawei MatePad SE |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Average of class Tablet (290 - 24605, n=51, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Honor Pad 8 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1077 - 1273, n=13) | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Huawei MatePad SE |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Average of class Tablet (858 - 5751, n=51, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2301 - 2930, n=13) | |
Honor Pad 8 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Average of class Tablet (2.5 - 279, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Honor Pad 8 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (5.1 - 9.8, n=14) |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Average of class Tablet (3 - 111, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4.6 - 17, n=14) | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Honor Pad 8 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Average of class Tablet (0.9 - 90, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Honor Pad 8 | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1.4 - 3.3, n=14) |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 97.3, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2.7 - 11, n=14) | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Honor Pad 8 |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Average of class Tablet (0.4 - 48, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Honor Pad 8 | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1.3 - 1.5, n=9) |
Octane V2 / Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad | |
Honor Pad 8 | |
Oppo Pad Air | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6358 - 14279, n=11) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE |
Oppo Pad Air | Huawei MatePad SE | Honor Pad 8 | Xiaomi Redmi Pad | Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -72% | 1% | 30% | -72% | -10% | -13% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 921.6 | 293.6 -68% | 833.56 -10% | 976.9 6% | 255.1 -72% | 708 ? -23% | 850 ? -8% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 717 | 99.5 -86% | 708.51 -1% | 883.6 23% | 101.1 -86% | 517 ? -28% | 532 ? -26% |
Random Read 4KB | 177.1 | 61.8 -65% | 189.57 7% | 250.82 42% | 68.3 -61% | 188 ? 6% | 167 ? -6% |
Random Write 4KB | 172.8 | 54 -69% | 186.95 8% | 257.02 49% | 57.5 -67% | 182.5 ? 6% | 150.8 ? -13% |
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.5 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Oppo Pad Air audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Oppo Pad Air 7100 mAh | Huawei MatePad SE 5100 mAh | Honor Pad 8 7250 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Pad 8000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 7040 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -22% | -11% | 28% | -17% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 823 | 638 -22% | 733 -11% | 1057 28% | 679 -17% |
Reader / Idle | 2009 | 2448 | 3640 | 1973 | |
H.264 | 958 | 838 | 971 | 824 | |
Load | 249 | 225 | 310 | 230 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 如果你能负担得起,你会得到一个好的平板电脑
Oppo Pad Air并不十分便宜,但它提供了一个非常别致和轻巧的外壳,一个大电池,可以实现长时间运行,以及快速的内存。
黑屏显示,Oppo Pad Air的首选使用领域是室内。因此,摄像头更适合于扫描东西或做视觉笔记,而不是拍摄伟大的自然风光。
这款平板电脑的一个特点是其快速的120赫兹屏幕,可以实现非常流畅的滚动,也可以在没有PWM的情况下进行管理。
你不应该过分依赖人脸识别:它的工作方式比其他平板电脑更不可靠,更笨拙。
Oppo Pad Air是一款并不便宜的平板电脑,拥有120赫兹的屏幕,良好的扬声器,以及较长的运行时间。
华为 华为MatePad SE提供了相同的SoC,价格却低得多,但你必须接受其操作系统的特殊性。 三星的Galaxy Tab A8也根据要求提供了LTE,但电池的寿命没有那么长。
价格和可用性
由于专利纠纷,Oppo目前没有在德国通过自己的网站销售该平板电脑。
然而,你可以从amazon.de获得它:与64 GB的大容量存储版本在测试时的价格约为271欧元,而amazon.de提供128GB的平板电脑,价格为314欧元。
Oppo Pad Air
-
01/25/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.