Notebookcheck Logo
小米 Pad 8 评测

让更昂贵的平板电脑变得多余 - 小米 Pad 8 评测

保存并享受

小米 Pad 8 是一款经济实惠的平板电脑，但它并不需要躲避上流社会的眼光：快速的处理器、笔输入、明亮的显示屏和金属一体机身外壳让它看起来非常有质感。请阅读我们的评测，了解小米平板电脑的详细表现。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android ARM Touchscreen Tablet

判决

小米 Pad 8 的配置非常高，比昂贵得多的设备更胜一筹：例如，显示屏边缘窄，屏幕明亮且无闪烁，几乎在所有情况下都有足够的电量，在长时间负载的情况下只有适度的节流。

这款平板电脑不会发热，外观非常吸引人，而且做工简洁。由于支持手写笔和桌面模式，它也非常适合工作使用。您还可以期待长时间的更新。

与小米 Pad 8 Pro 相比，它在最高性能和存储空间方面略有不足。此外，它的摄像头和指纹传感器也较弱，但我们测试设备的电池续航时间甚至更长一些。

是现在购买进口平板电脑，还是等待国际版，这是个口味问题：中国版的小米 Pad 8 在语言选择和Android Auto 方面存在限制，但在其他方面可以在全球范围内顺利使用。

Pros

+ 价格相对便宜
+ 设备非常坚固
+ 高质量的金属一体成型机身
+ 时尚外观
+ 明亮的 IPS 显示屏
+ 无 PWM
+ 明亮的显示屏，色彩准确度高
+ 高性能
+ 快速 UFS 4.1 内存
+ 电池寿命长
+ 强大的扬声器
+ 支持手写笔
+ 桌面模式
+ 更新时间长

Cons

- 无指纹传感器
- 无蜂窝网络或卫星定位功能
- 无 microSD 插槽
- 未通过 IP 认证
- 进口版本有软件限制

价格和供应情况

从我们的租赁供应商TradingShenzhen 进口的小米 Pad 售价为 337 欧元（约合 390 美元）起。

与前代产品一样，在欧洲上市可能只是时间问题。

Amazon Logo
$210.70
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Only WiFi (No Calls or Text) 11" 2.5K Octa Core 4 Speakers Global ROM 9000mAh Bluetooth 5.3 8MP Model 25040RP0AL (Graphite Gray, 256GB + 8GB)
  • $379.50
    XIAOMI Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version Global (No Calls or Text) 11.2 inches 3.2K 144Hz 8850mAh Bluetooth 5.4 Four Speakers 13 Mp Model 2410CRP4CG (Gray, 256GB + 8GB)
  • $369.50
    XIAOMI Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version Global (No Calls or Text) 11.2 inches 3.2K 144Hz 8850mAh Bluetooth 5.4 Four Speakers 13 Mp Model 2410CRP4CG (Blue, 256GB + 8GB)

规格

Xiaomi Pad 8 (Pad 8 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-A720 / Cortex-X4
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 825
Memory
12 GB 
Display
11.20 inch 3:2, 3200 x 2136 pixel 344 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, IPS, glossy: yes, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 199 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.8 x 251.2 x 173.4
Battery
9200 mAh Lithium-Ion, 45 Watt charging, 22.5 Watt reverse charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF, videos @4K 30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.3, 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Additional features
Speakers: 4 speakers, charger (china), USB cable, fanless
Weight
485 g
Price
437 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - 金属一体成型，售价低于 400 欧元

小米 Pad 8 比上一代产品 Pad 7 更轻、更薄。 Pad 7.不过，如果将这两款平板电脑并排比较，你会发现它们只有细微的差别，比如摄像头模块的设计。

实用的 3:2 长宽比保持不变，屏占比接近 86%，小米 Pad 8 看起来非常现代。价格明显更贵的 iPad Air 11跟不上。

由于采用了稳定的铝合金一体成型机身，小米 Pad 8 只能轻微扭动，但你可能会听到一些悄无声息的 "吱吱 "声。精致的绿色、蓝色或灰色磨砂背壳不易沾染指纹。目前还没有防水防尘认证。

小米 Pad 8 评测
小米 Pad 8 评测
小米 Pad 8 评测
小米 Pad 8 评测
小米 Pad 8 评测

尺寸比较

❌
261 mm 177.3 mm 6.2 mm 510 g254.3 mm 165.8 mm 6.6 mm 524 g251.22 mm 173.42 mm 6.18 mm 500 g251.2 mm 173.4 mm 5.8 mm 485 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

功能 - 内存有限

对于一款价格相对低廉的平板电脑来说，它的设备非常齐全：红外触发器、笔输入、快速 USB 端口（包括显示端口支持）以及用于无线支付服务的 NFC 等。

此外，还有三种内存版本：

  • 128 GB UFS 3.1 闪存/8 GB LPDDR5X 内存
  • 256 GB UFS 4.1 闪存/8 GB LPDDR5X 内存
  • 256 GB UFS 4.1 闪存/12 GB LPDDR5T 内存

如果您需要更大的存储空间，那就得另寻他处了，尤其是不支持 microSD 卡。

软件 - 预计 6 年更新

小米 Pad 8 采用 HyperOS 3 作为操作系统，基于Android 16，可以更灵活地处理多个窗口，还提供了类似三星 DeX 的桌面模式。

我们测试的是中文 ROM 的进口版本，除英文外不支持任何欧洲语言，但可以顺利安装谷歌服务。不过，Android Auto 不支持。

如果你想在欧洲设置你的母语并使用所有功能，你可能需要等待全球版本的平板电脑，尤其是在中国以外的地区很难解锁引导加载器。

我们的测试设备带有 2025 年 10 月的安全补丁，在测试时仍是合理的最新版本。

在小米安全中心中，仍然没有关于平板电脑更新持续时间的信息。前代产品接受了 6 年的更新和至少 4 个新的Android 版本。因此，可以认为小米 Pad 8 至少也是如此。

小米 Pad 8 软件
小米 Pad 8 软件
小米 Pad 8 软件

可持续性

包装不含塑料。不过，没有关于其他可持续发展方面的信息，如二氧化碳排放量。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 小米平板电脑上的 WiFi 7

小米 Pad 8 的一大创新是还支持 WiFi 7 标准。

遗憾的是，我们还无法使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 测试路由器对最新标准进行测试，但在 WiFi 6E 网络中的传输速率整体上相当稳定和快速。这意味着你可以轻松使用千兆互联网连接，而且它还配备了更快的网络。

没有 5G 选项，也不支持卫星定位。

Networking
Xiaomi Pad 8
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
734 (min: 649) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1642 (min: 1493) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
905 (min: 435) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
698 (min: 460) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1798 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1574 (min: 765) MBit/s ∼96%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1015 (min: 495) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
876 (min: 737) MBit/s ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
525 (min: 313) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
739 (min: 275) MBit/s ∼69%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
938 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1074 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1277 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1471 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼90%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
585 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
666 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1233 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1470 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼90%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 8; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø734 (649-822)
Xiaomi Pad 8; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1642 (1493-1754)

摄像头 - 好的摄像头对平板电脑有多重要？

前置摄像头拍摄的照片
前置摄像头拍摄的照片

与 Pro 机型相比，平板电脑的摄像头需要做出一些妥协，但无论如何，平板电脑很少用于摄影。您还可以通过 Hyper Connect 连接装有 HyperOS 的智能手机，将其摄像头用作网络摄像头。

小米 Pad 8 本身背面有一个 1300 万像素的摄像头，与 Pro 机型的摄像头相比，分辨率较低、对光线敏感度较低、传感器面积较小。在光线充足的情况下，照片的效果还是相当不错的，但较远的物体有时看起来会有些粗糙。

在弱光环境下，暗部细节不足，细节丢失。

视频最高可录制 4K 和 30 fps，在光线充足的情况下，图像质量也相当不错。

自拍摄像头拍摄的照片色彩有些暗淡，只能显示大致的细节。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
6.8 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 8: 7.61 ∆E min: 1.29 - max: 13.12 ∆E
ColorChecker
27.2 ∆E
45.3 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
46.3 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
26.6 ∆E
55.4 ∆E
56.9 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
32.2 ∆E
61.4 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
55.2 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 8: 38.89 ∆E min: 12.85 - max: 61.38 ∆E

配件和保修 - 配件齐全

小米 Pad 8 的配件包括触控笔和键盘盖。前代产品在欧洲也有这两种配件，所以你也可以期待它们在 Pad 8 上出现。

保修 保修期小米的保修期通常为 12 个月，TradingShenzhen 允许您将设备寄往德国地址进行保修索赔。

输入设备和操作 - 指纹传感器丢失

屏幕每秒最多可显示 144 幅图像。触摸屏的采样率高达 360 赫兹。这比 Pro 型号要低，但只有专业游戏玩家才能真正注意到其中的差异：小米 Pad 8 的操作也非常流畅。

不过，Pro 机型上的指纹传感器不见了，因此只能通过前置摄像头使用面部识别进行生物解锁。

键盘景观
键盘景观
直立式键盘
直立式键盘

显示屏 - Pad 8 的 IPS 屏幕

子像素结构
子像素结构

小米 Pad 8 的 IPS 显示屏分辨率为 3,200 x 2,136 像素，加上 11.2 英寸的直径，像素密度高达 344 PPI。虽然在日常使用中屏幕亮度不如前代产品，但仍能轻松击败同价位的大多数平板电脑。

这意味着你在明亮的环境中工作也不会有任何问题。色彩显示效果令人印象深刻，在原色专业模式下精确度很高。如果需要，还可以根据环境光线自动调整色彩。

显示屏无闪烁；我们没有测量 PWM。

623
cd/m²		621
cd/m²		615
cd/m²
599
cd/m²		627
cd/m²		609
cd/m²
604
cd/m²		608
cd/m²		614
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 627 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 613.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 627 cd/m²
Contrast: 2090:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.25 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.183
CCT: 6898 K
Xiaomi Pad 8
IPS, 3200x2136, 11.2"		Xiaomi Pad 7
LCD, 3200x2136, 11.2"		Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
TFT-LCD, 2800x1840, 11.5"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
TFT LCD, 2112x1320, 10.9"
Screen
-37%
-114%
-83%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
627
838
34%
511
-19%
468
-25%
Brightness (cd/m²)
613
815
33%
449
-27%
437
-29%
Brightness Distribution (%)
96
96
0%
83
-14%
83
-14%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
0.3
0.88
-193%
0.99
-230%
0.26
13%
Contrast (:1)
2090
952
-54%
516
-75%
1800
-14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.25
1.8
-44%
3.6
-188%
3.74
-199%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.95
3.9
-32%
7.5
-154%
8.51
-188%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
2.5
-39%
5.5
-206%
5.5
-206%
Gamma
2.183 101%
2.25 98%
2.27 97%
2.234 98%
CCT
6898 94%
6912 94%
7566 86%
7958 82%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8125 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.5 ms rise
↘ 11.7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.1 ms rise
↘ 15.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms).
室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 完全满足几乎所有需求

使用 骁龙 8s 第 4 代小米 Pad 8 采用的是来自第二性能联盟的 SoC，尽管如此，它提供的功率远超过这个价位的常见功率，应该可以轻松满足大多数活动的需求。

在日常使用和游戏方面也没有任何限制。

Geekbench 6.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (2129 - 2212, n=3)
2159 Points +1%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
2135 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1893 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 4128, n=97, last 2 years)
1505 Points -30%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
1245 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1021 Points -52%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (6792 - 7161, n=3)
6928 Points +1%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
6832 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
5089 Points -26%
Average of class Tablet
  (848 - 16544, n=97, last 2 years)
4828 Points -29%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
3989 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2937 Points -57%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
2012215 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (1975046 - 2043045, n=3)
2010102 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1408366 Points -30%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 3475590, n=71, last 2 years)
1233653 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
588186 Points -71%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
Points -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (15928 - 15973, n=3)
15948 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
15944 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
15466 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
12738 Points -20%
Average of class Tablet
  (4622 - 27428, n=78, last 2 years)
12648 Points -21%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
11872 Points -26%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1098 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (227 - 2155, n=54, last 2 years)
996 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
911 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
9942 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (9930 - 9953, n=3)
9942 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
8323 Points -16%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
6401 Points -36%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 13159, n=64, last 2 years)
6165 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
5076 Points -49%
System
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
12968 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (11169 - 12968, n=3)
12361 Points -5%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
10447 Points -19%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
9977 Points -23%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 18343, n=64, last 2 years)
9391 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
9003 Points -31%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (11058 - 13961, n=3)
12032 Points +9%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
11076 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
10045 Points -9%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
8362 Points -25%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 17963, n=64, last 2 years)
7212 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
7053 Points -36%
Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
33512 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (33256 - 33672, n=3)
33480 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
24169 Points -28%
Average of class Tablet
  (88 - 57192, n=64, last 2 years)
17097 Points -49%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
12763 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
88 Points -100%
Web
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
2101 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (1869 - 2101, n=3)
2004 Points -5%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1887 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2370, n=64, last 2 years)
1545 Points -26%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
1532 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1432 Points -32%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 76852, n=63, last 2 years)
17373 Points +2%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
16995 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (16446 - 17213, n=3)
16885 Points -1%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
13965 Points -18%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
10847 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
6283 Points -63%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet
  (138 - 55794, n=53, last 2 years)
6149 Points +339%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (1389 - 1474, n=3)
1422 Points +1%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
1402 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1143 Points -18%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
738 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
551 Points -61%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Tablet
  (166 - 5295, n=28, last 2 years)
696 Points +48%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
469 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (451 - 469, n=3)
463 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
199 Points -58%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Tablet
  (154 - 41155, n=28, last 2 years)
3416 Points +630%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
468 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (451 - 468, n=3)
462 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
353 Points -25%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average of class Tablet
  (88 - 57388, n=28, last 2 years)
4906 Points +375%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
1032 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (997 - 1032, n=3)
1019 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
515 Points -50%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Tablet
  (66.1 - 8305, n=11, last 2 years)
1268 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (175 - 194, n=2)
184.5 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
101 Points
Score V6
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
7948 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (5828 - 7948, n=3)
6592 Points -17%
Average of class Tablet
  (70.4 - 17293, n=28, last 2 years)
4039 Points -49%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
3671 Points -54%
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
4499 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3107 Points -31%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1018 Points -77%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
848 Points -81%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
4545 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3098 Points -32%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
994 Points -78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
842 Points -81%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
17946 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11654 Points -35%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3802 Points -79%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2978 Points -83%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
8557 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
8711 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1835 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
974 Points -47%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1847 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
987 Points -47%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
83 fps -31%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
570 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
501 fps -12%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
256 fps -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
120 fps -79%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
114 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
65 fps -43%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
341 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
297 fps -13%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
155 fps -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
79 fps -77%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
73 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps -14%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
39 fps -47%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
237 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
198 fps -16%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
106 fps -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
51 fps -78%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
41 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
36 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps -44%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -46%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
136 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps -17%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps -65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
31 fps -77%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
39 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17 fps -56%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -59%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
68 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps -26%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
14 fps -79%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
56 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
47 fps -16%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps -54%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
174 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
131 fps -25%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps -63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps -80%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
31 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23 fps -26%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10 fps -68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6 fps -81%

小米 Pad 8 在上网时也表现出色，即使是复杂的网站也能快速加载。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 8 (Chrome 142)
241 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (233 - 241, n=3)
237 Points -2%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
187.643 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet (22.3 - 395, n=67, last 2 years)
154.5 Points -36%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
89.474 Points -63%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Xiaomi Pad 8 (Chrome 142)
348 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (339 - 348, n=3)
345 runs/min -1%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 790, n=56, last 2 years)
203 runs/min -42%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
145 runs/min -58%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
62.7 runs/min -82%
Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Xiaomi Pad 8 (Chrome 142)
22.1 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (19.7 - 22.1, n=3)
21 runs/min -5%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
15.9 runs/min -28%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 49.1, n=64, last 2 years)
14.6 runs/min -34%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
3.11 runs/min -86%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Pad 8 (Chrome 142)
185 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (137 - 185, n=3)
168.7 Points -9%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
151 Points -18%
Average of class Tablet (26 - 376, n=72, last 2 years)
139.4 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite (Chrome 140)
121 Points -35%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
85 Points -54%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 8 (Chrome 142)
71902 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (71781 - 71902, n=3)
71853 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
66744 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 138481, n=96, last 2 years)
43504 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite (Chrome 140)
39283 Points -45%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
32134 Points -55%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (243 - 27101, n=81, last 2 years)
2616 ms * -396%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
1243.7 ms * -136%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite (Chrome 140)
1023.4 ms * -94%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
564.8 ms * -7%
Xiaomi Pad 8 (Chrome 142)
527 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (521 - 534, n=3)
527 ms * -0%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 4.1 内存用于我们测试的大内存配置。这里的数据传输非常快，加载时间也很短。

Xiaomi Pad 8Xiaomi Pad 7Huawei MatePad 11.5 SSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 LiteAverage 256 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-1%
-19%
-72%
15%
-40%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
3899.2
3911.82
0%
1837.4
-53%
523.85
-87%
3841 ?(3782 - 3899, n=2)
-1%
1786 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=84, last 2 years)
-54%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
3391.2
3387.43
0%
1134.93
-67%
237.31
-93%
3245 ?(3098 - 3391, n=2)
-4%
1334 ?(80.4 - 3773, n=84, last 2 years)
-61%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
325.1
311.09
-4%
334.71
3%
241.12
-26%
385 ?(325 - 446, n=2)
18%
244 ?(20.1 - 475, n=84, last 2 years)
-25%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
348.2
344.51
-1%
498.29
43%
62.52
-82%
508 ?(348 - 667, n=2)
46%
278 ?(9.1 - 989, n=84, last 2 years)
-20%

排放 - 在负载情况下仅适度节流

温度

在负载情况下，机壳上的热量积聚仍然在一定范围内：我们在室温下测得的温度为 41.8 °C。当然，在高温环境下这一数值可能会升高，但仍有相当大的余量，不会让人感到不适。

如果平板电脑负载时间较长，3DMark 压力测试显示性能损失可达 18%。

Max. Load
 37.1 °C40.2 °C38.1 °C 
 34.4 °C36.4 °C33 °C 
 33.3 °C34.2 °C31.9 °C 
Maximum: 40.2 °C
Average: 35.4 °C
34.5 °C41.8 °C39.5 °C
32.7 °C38.9 °C37.5 °C
31.5 °C32.6 °C34.1 °C
Maximum: 41.8 °C
Average: 35.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.1 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.6 % +16%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86.9 % +2%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
84.9 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.4 % +21%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % +21%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89.4 % +9%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
82 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
97.2 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
98.6 % +10%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
90 %
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 8; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø25.2 (23.9-29.2)
Xiaomi Pad 8; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø85.2 (82.3-96.9)
Xiaomi Pad 8; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø23.8 (23.6-24.2)
Xiaomi Pad 8; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø12.8 (12.3-13.7)
热图返回
热图返回
前方热图
前方热图

发言人

小米 Pad 8 配备了四个扬声器，能提供不错的立体声音效，在较大的房间里也能发出足够的声音。可以听到轻微的低音，整体声音非常均衡。

您可以通过 USB 或蓝牙 5.4 无线连接耳机或扬声器。所有重要的无线音频编解码器在这里都可用，因此您可以连接外部音频解决方案，并很有可能获得良好的音质。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.5402543.240.43134.732.64036.536.45044.345.56329.430.48018.830.210021.743.81252153.3160206020017.661.32501663.431516.967.940013.163.850017.264.863021.171.580021.375100018.177.5125016.279.3160017.878.3200016.374.2250012.874.5315012.568.3400011.966.6500012.571.5630012.676.7800012.476.51000012.371.21250012.264.51600011.671.4SPL28.386.9N171.3median 16.2median 71.3Delta3.55.537.845.234.841.227.435.333.836.640.741.725.828.91834.918.1452051.218.757.316.35916.561.719.464.716.161.915.965.219.567.418.367.614.674.714.976.814.475.413.772.612.974.915.77317.268.819.363.918.471.920.179.616.777.817.36516.159.829.185.91.166.4median 16.7median 67.41.76hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Pad 8Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Pad 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 超大电池提供充足的续航时间

耗电量

考虑到显示屏较大，功耗相当低。不过，在高负载情况下可能会出现较高的功率峰值。

平板电脑的最大充电功率为 45 瓦，有线反向充电功率可达 22.5 瓦。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.3 / 2 / 2.3 Watt
Load midlight 6.6 / 13.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Pad 8
9200 mAh		Xiaomi Pad 7
8850 mAh		Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
8800 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
8000 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
 		Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
22%
-67%
-31%
19%
-55%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
1.3
0.74
43%
1.53
-18%
2.3
-77%
0.96 ?(0.4 - 1.3, n=3)
26%
2.03 ?(0.7 - 5.6, n=77, last 2 years)
-56%
Idle Average * (Watt)
2
1.72
14%
5.96
-198%
2.8
-40%
1.38 ?(0.7 - 2, n=3)
31%
3.9 ?(1 - 9.2, n=77, last 2 years)
-95%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
2.3
1.74
24%
6.07
-164%
3.1
-35%
1.663 ?(1.21 - 2.3, n=3)
28%
4.26 ?(1.3 - 9.5, n=77, last 2 years)
-85%
Load Average * (Watt)
6.6
7.26
-10%
6.87
-4%
6.8
-3%
7.11 ?(6.6 - 7.62, n=2)
-8%
9.17 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=71, last 2 years)
-39%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
13.3
8.11
39%
6.88
48%
13.1
2%
11.1 ?(8.92 - 13.3, n=2)
17%
13.5 ?(4.6 - 41.6, n=71, last 2 years)
-2%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 8; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø11.5 (7.61-15.2)
Xiaomi Pad 8; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.07 (1.64-2.32)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 8; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø15.2 (15.1-15.3)
Xiaomi Pad 8; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.07 (1.64-2.32)

电池寿命

在我们的 Wi-Fi 实际测试中，这款平板电脑的续航时间远远超过了 20 小时。这也难怪，因为小米 Pad 8 还配备了 9,200 毫安时的超大电池，比上一代产品多出 350 毫安时。

这意味着你可以在下雨天和平板电脑一起躺在沙发上而无需充电，甚至在工作时也无需插电--即使是长途火车旅行也可以毫不费力地完成。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
20h 41min
Xiaomi Pad 8
9200 mAh		Xiaomi Pad 7
8850 mAh		Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
8800 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
8000 mAh
Battery runtime
-13%
-33%
-26%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
20.7
18.1
-13%
13.9
-33%
15.3
-26%
Reader / Idle (h)
41.4
H.264 (h)
20.8
Load (h)
4

Notebookcheck 总体评分

小米 Pad 8 价格相对便宜，但功能强大。

与小米 Pad 8 Pro 相比，你不必做出任何重大妥协。

小米 Pad 8 评测。测试设备由 TradingShenzhen 提供。
小米 Pad 8 评测。测试设备由 TradingShenzhen 提供。

Xiaomi Pad 8 - 12/04/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
87 / 98 → 88%
Keyboard
70 / 80 → 88%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
47 / 69 → 68%
Weight
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Battery
92%
Display
87%
Games Performance
46 / 65 → 71%
Application Performance
73 / 92 → 80%
AI Performance
31%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
83 / 91 → 91%
Camera
61 / 90 → 68%
Average
67%
87%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
40%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
94.9%
Repairability
12%
Software Updates
86.7%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 51.4%

可比较的替代品

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
87.1%
Xiaomi Pad 8
Xiaomi Pad 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 825 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $210.70
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Only WiFi...
2. $379.50
XIAOMI Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version...
3. $369.50
XIAOMI Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version...
List Price: 437€		485 g256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash11.20"
3200x2136
344 PPI
IPS
2.
85.9%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 732 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $379.50
XIAOMI Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version...
2. $529.50
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Ver...
3. $335.00
XIAOMI Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version...
List Price: 400€		500 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash11.20"
3200x2136
344 PPI
LCD
3.
81.1%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W ⎘
HiSilicon Maleoon 910 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $28.99
YOUULAR Tablet Case for Huaw...
2. $12.96
Kepuch Custer Case Compatibl...
3. $11.96
Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass...
List Price: 399€		510 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash11.50"
2800x1840
291 PPI
TFT-LCD
4.
79.9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘
ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1		Amazon:
1. $299.99
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite,...
2. $369.99
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite,...
3. $369.99
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite,...
List Price: 399€		524 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash10.90"
2112x1320
228 PPI
TFT LCD

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 让更昂贵的平板电脑变得多余 - 小米 Pad 8 评测
Florian Schmitt, 2025-12- 6 (Update: 2025-12- 6)