关于 Oppo Pad SE 的结论
超大的电池容量和相对较轻的重量使 Oppo Pad SE 成为中型和经济型平板电脑中一个有趣的选择。在我们的 WLAN 电池测试中，Oppo 平板电脑的续航时间超过 23 小时。联想的 Tab Plus 能多用几分钟，但重量和体积也明显更大。其他竞争对手在这方面根本无法与之匹敌。
没有 PWM 闪烁的明亮屏幕也令人印象深刻。无线局域网速度很快，但发送数据时比较弱。不过，您也可以使用 4G 网络进行数据传输。
500 万像素摄像头更像是一种临时解决方案。
与同价位产品相比，它的性能非常出色：虽然不能满足超高要求的任务，但在日常生活中完全没有问题，例如可以流畅地播放 YouTube 上 1440p 的视频。四个扬声器也能发出强劲的音效。
总的来说，Oppo Pad SE 是寻找大而不贵平板电脑用户的不错选择。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
在测试期间，Oppo Pad SE 在中欧很难买到。
这款平板电脑仅在coolblue有售，售价为 269 欧元（310 美元）。
规格
外壳和功能 - 花小钱办大事
Oppo Pad SE 采用灰蓝色金属机身。不过，外壳上部的五分之一采用了塑料材质，以提高天线的接收质量。圆形摄像头模块位于顶部中央。
正面的屏幕周围有一个约 6 毫米厚的边框，在外观和实用性之间取得了很好的平衡，因此很少会发生边缘误触触摸屏的情况。
平板电脑不能扭曲，做工和材料过渡看起来非常优质。
128 GB 的大容量存储空间是这个价位的标准配置，8 GB 的内存也相当宽裕。没有 NFC 芯片，也不能通过 USB 端口输出图像信号。
通信和操作 - 带有移动网络的 Oppo 平板电脑
买家只能使用 WiFi 5，尽管 576 MBit/s 的最大传输速率相当不错。另一方面，它的传输速度要慢得多。
如果您想在平板电脑上使用手机资费，最多只能使用 4G 网络。中欧地区可以使用所有重要频率，但在长途旅行中使用移动网络可能会有困难。
触摸屏每秒扫描 120 次输入，90 Hz 的屏幕响应速度非常快。遗憾的是，没有用于解锁的指纹传感器，但可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别。由于分辨率较低，第一次识别并不总是成功，尤其是在弱光环境下。
| Networking | |
| Oppo Pad SE | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Teclast T60 AI | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Tab Plus | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
软件和可持续性 - 无更新承诺
Android 15 是内部 ColorOS 的基础。这提供了一个非常清晰和井井有条的系统。
OPPO 没有明确评论其平板电脑的更新时间。Pad SE 肯定还会收到 16。2025 年 5 月的安全补丁更新也将在我们的测试期间提供。
OPPO 没有使用塑料包装，而是用大豆油墨印刷包装盒。不过，目前还没有关于可持续发展的其他信息，例如设备中的可回收材料。Android
摄像头 - 必要时有用
Oppo Pad SE 的前后摄像头均为 500 万像素。
后置摄像头更适合扫描文件。在拍照时，它的细节并不丰富，对周围环境的拍摄比较粗糙。在光线不足和反差较大的情况下，摄像头上的劣质涂层还会造成反光。
视频录制最高可达 1080p 和 30fps。不过，质量也很一般，尤其是自动对焦会造成问题。
前置摄像头可拍摄合格的自拍照，在光线良好的情况下也可用于视频通话。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light
显示屏 - Oppo 管理，无 PWM
这款平板电脑的 11 英寸 IPS 屏幕亮度高达 518 cd/m²，以微弱优势击败竞争对手。不过，在户外强光下仍会影响可读性。
显示屏有轻微偏蓝，尤其是黄色明显失真。
即使在低亮度水平下，我们也没有发现 PWM，因此这款平板电脑应该也适合敏感人群使用。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 518 cd/m²
Contrast: 1524:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.54 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.84
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
97.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.243
| Oppo Pad SE IPS, 1920x1200, 11" | Huawei MatePad SE 11 LCD, 1900x1200, 11" | Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11" | Teclast T60 AI IPS, 2000x1200, 12" | Lenovo Tab Plus IPS, 2000x1200, 11.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 12% | 13% | -44% | 10% | |
| Brightness middle | 518 | 461 -11% | 473 -9% | 343 -34% | 465 -10% |
| Brightness | 507 | 451 -11% | 449 -11% | 327 -36% | 438 -14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 87 -6% | 85 -9% | 89 -4% | 88 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.3 12% | 0.28 18% | 0.2 41% | 0.3 12% |
| Contrast | 1524 | 1537 1% | 1689 11% | 1715 13% | 1550 2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.54 | 2.48 45% | 3 34% | 8.1 -78% | 2.96 35% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.97 | 4.9 39% | 6 25% | 20.45 -157% | 5.32 33% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 3.5 29% | 2.7 45% | 9.5 -94% | 3.6 27% |
| Gamma | 2.243 98% | 2.183 101% | 2.27 97% | 2.197 100% | 2.372 93% |
| CCT | 7504 87% | 7471 87% | 6589 99% | 9376 69% | 6016 108% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8367 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 31.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.2 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航时间--平板电脑速度快、续航时间长
联发科 联发科 Helio G100提供了不错的性能值，可以超越许多同价位的平板电脑。其性能足以满足日常使用，以屏幕分辨率甚至略高的分辨率播放视频流也没有任何问题。
外壳上的热量积聚只是非常局部的。压力测试显示，长时间负载后性能也没有明显下降。
Oppo Pad SE 配备了四个扬声器。音质不错，还能发出一些中低音。同时，高音并不完全清晰，但就该价格范围而言，音效还是不错的。有足够的编解码器可用于无线音频传输，因此您通常可以连接高质量的耳机或扬声器。
Oppo Pad SE 的电池无疑是该设备的一大亮点：制造商在设备中内置了整整 9340 毫安时的电池。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，这款平板电脑的续航时间为 23:23 小时，因此即使经常使用，在没有电源插座的情况下也能使用两天。平板电脑的充电功率可达 33 瓦。
| Oppo Pad SE | Huawei MatePad SE 11 | Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE | Teclast T60 AI | Lenovo Tab Plus | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -51% | -58% | -25% | 2% | -23% | 10% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 980 | 528.79 -46% | 297.47 -70% | 1106.24 13% | 991.99 1% | 731 ? -25% | 1330 ? 36% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 885.6 | 103.41 -88% | 228.97 -74% | 252.07 -72% | 837.52 -5% | 531 ? -40% | 944 ? 7% |
| Random Read 4KB | 221.2 | 166.24 -25% | 102.41 -54% | 228.09 3% | 240.56 9% | 192.5 ? -13% | 210 ? -5% |
| Random Write 4KB | 215.3 | 119.02 -45% | 146.92 -32% | 117.81 -45% | 221.09 3% | 184.9 ? -14% | 218 ? 1% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE | |
| Lenovo Tab Plus | |
| Teclast T60 AI | |
| Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
| Oppo Pad SE | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Lenovo Tab Plus | |
| Oppo Pad SE | |
| Huawei MatePad SE 11 | |
| Teclast T60 AI | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE | |
Oppo Pad SE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Tab Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Oppo Pad SE 9340 mAh | Huawei MatePad SE 11 7700 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8000 mAh | Teclast T60 AI 8000 mAh | Lenovo Tab Plus 8600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -34% | -28% | -59% | 3% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 1403 | 931 -34% | 1017 -28% | 575 -59% | 1450 3% |
| Reader / Idle | 1992 | 4236 | 1177 | 2657 | |
| H.264 | 953 | 997 | 604 | 1113 | |
| Load | 254 | 231 | 217 | 367 |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Oppo Pad SE 的超长运行时间、无 PWM 的亮屏和良好的性能给人留下了深刻印象。
总之，300 美元左右的价格非常值得期待。
Oppo Pad SE
- 06/20/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代品比较
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
