三星 Galaxy A57 5G 评测总结
三星 Galaxy A57 5G 是 A 系列的一次非常成功的升级，但与前代机型相比，它却出人意料地保守。更轻薄的机身、高品质的做工、升级后的 IP68 防护等级以及更快的 Exynos 1680 芯片，共同构成了这款功能全面的产品。 此外，它还拥有长期的系统更新保障、稳定的日常性能，以及一款在日常使用中表现出色的明亮AMOLED屏幕——尽管目前竞争对手已提供更高的峰值亮度。
不过，该机型也存在一些缺点：相机表现虽稳健，但在这一价位段并无突出之处；在2026年，USB 2.0接口显得有些过时，而且三星在蓝牙编解码器方面也有所保留。 不过，最严重的问题是令人失望的续航表现——尽管电池容量保持不变，但实际续航时间甚至不如Galaxy A56。如果三星无法通过软件更新解决这一问题，这款智能手机将无法充分发挥其潜力。
因此，Galaxy A57 5G 是一款品质上乘的中端智能手机，但真正具有创新性的功能寥寥无几。对于拥有较旧款 Galaxy A 机型的用户而言，这将是一款现代、可靠且能获得长期软件支持的设备。 另一方面，Galaxy A56的用户则几乎找不到升级的理由，尤其是考虑到其明显更高的建议零售价进一步削弱了这款新机的附加值。
Pros
Cons
价格与供货情况
三星官网提供 Galaxy A57 的所有配色和存储版本。不过，在Notebooksbilliger、亚马逊等其他零售商处，该机型售价要低得多。
- $449.99Samsung Galaxy A57 5G (2026), Unlocked Android Smartphone, 128GB, AMOLED Display, Triple Camera, IP68, 5000mAh Battery, US Version, US 1 Yr Warranty, Awesome Gray
- $508.51Samsung Galaxy A57 5G (2026), Unlocked Android Smartphone, 256GB, AMOLED Display, Triple Camera, IP68, 5000mAh Battery, US Version, US 1 Yr Warranty, Awesome Gray
- $439.00Samsung Galaxy A57 5G 2025 | 256GB, 8GB, Dual SIM | 6.7" 120 Hz, Super AMOLED Plus, IP68 Water Resistant, Android 16 | International Model Factory Unlocked for Global
Table of Contents
- 三星 Galaxy A57 5G 评测总结
- 规格：三星 Galaxy A57 5G
- 机身——Galaxy A57 具备更高的IP防护等级和更纤薄的设计
- 特点——与上一代机型相比几乎没有变化
- 软件——Galaxy A系列，提供六年系统更新
- 通信与GNSS——Galaxy A57支持6 GHz Wi-Fi
- 手机功能与通话质量——配备双eSIM的A57
- 相机——Galaxy A57 配备出色的主摄像头
- 配件与保修——Galaxy A57 简约版包装内容
- 输入与操作——板载光学指纹传感器
- 显示屏——三星继续在低频下采用PWM技术
- 性能——Galaxy A57 搭载 Exynos 1680 处理器
- 游戏——不适合发烧友
- 排放量——Exynos 1680 几乎未减少排放
- 电池续航时间——Galaxy A57 配备 5,000 mAh 电池
- Notebookcheck 综合评分
- 可能方案的比较
三星 Galaxy A57 5G 是 Galaxy A56 5G 的继任者，其最大亮点在于更纤薄的机身设计和更轻的重量。三星还进行了标准的SoC升级，并提升了IP防护等级。在Wi-Fi和蓝牙性能方面也有所提升。
在德国，存储容量有 128 GB 或 256 GB 两种选择，均配备 8 GB 运行内存；建议零售价已大幅上涨，目前分别为 529 欧元和 589 欧元。 12/512 GB版本虽未在德国正式发售，但可通过多家零售商作为欧盟进口机购买。
规格：三星 Galaxy A57 5G
机身——Galaxy A57 具备更高的IP防护等级和更纤薄的设计
当你第一次拿起三星 Galaxy A57 5G 时，立刻会注意到它多么纤薄轻巧。三星官方标称其厚度为 6.9 毫米；我们实测仅为 6.8 毫米，不过算上凸起的摄像头，厚度可达 9.85 毫米。 哑光铝制边框赋予其极高的质感，不过玻璃背板却是一如既往的“指纹磁铁”。与正面一样，背板采用的是耐用的康宁大猩猩 Victus+ 玻璃。
其做工质感彰显出真正的高端品质；只有在仔细观察时，才会发现后盖玻璃与周围边框之间的缝隙在角落处并不完全均匀。Galaxy A57在尝试弯曲时毫无声响，且展现出相当强的抗弯韧性。
三星已提升了这款智能手机的IP防护等级，现已通过IP68认证，这意味着它不仅防尘，而且在长时间浸入清水中（深度不超过1.5米，持续至少30分钟）时仍能保持防水性能。 该机型提供炫酷灰、冰蓝、淡紫和海军蓝四种配色。
特点——与上一代机型相比几乎没有变化
其规格与Galaxy A56名义上完全相同；A57搭载了全新的SoC和更先进的通信模块，现已支持蓝牙6.0和Wi-Fi 6E。
这款Galaxy手机仍采用USB 2.0接口，既不支持有线显示输出，也不支持DeX模式。在这方面，Pixel 10a等机型提供了更丰富的功能。
软件——Galaxy A系列，提供六年系统更新
Galaxy A57 5G 预装了 Android 16 系统和三星的 One UI 8.5 用户界面。预计该机型将在未来六年内持续获得安全补丁和功能更新。
在 AI 功能方面，与 S 系列及其 其前代机型相比，A57的AI功能已大幅缩减。遗憾的是，三星预装了更多第三方应用，其中现在包括Netto、TikTok和Temu等。不过，这仅仅是个小麻烦，因为这些应用可以完全卸载。
可持续发展
通信与GNSS——Galaxy A57支持6 GHz Wi-Fi
在三星 Galaxy A57 5G 上，移动数据连接在 5G 网络下的表现最佳。虽然支持的频段范围尚可，但对于经常出国旅行的用户而言，这方面的表现并不尽如人意。在城市地区，信号接收效果极佳，无可挑剔。
在 Wi-Fi 方面，三星终于增加了对 6 GHz 频段的支持，但仍未搭载 Wi-Fi 7。我们的测试还显示，其传输速度并非顶尖水平。
| Networking | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Honor 600 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average Wi-Fi 6E | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
在室内，卫星定位需要相当长的时间，但随后能锁定一个相当精确的位置。在室外，定位速度要快得多，精度约为1米。
在骑行过程中，我们将三星Galaxy A57与 华为 Watch Fit 5 Pro进行了对比。我们注意到，尽管这款智能手机仅采用单频GNSS，但其定位更新频率较低，却依然相当精准。因此，A57非常适合用于导航任务。
手机功能与通话质量——配备双eSIM的A57
三星 Galaxy A57 5G 支持两张 nano-SIM 卡或两张 eSIM 卡；也可混合使用。贴耳通话时，通话音质自然且杂音较少。降噪功能表现良好，能有效过滤大量背景噪音；但在嘈杂的环境中，用户的声音会显得有些闷。
在免提模式下，通话对方的声音略显闷沉，但始终清晰易懂。麦克风的拾音范围尚可，但与手机的距离不宜超过两米。
相机——Galaxy A57 配备出色的主摄像头
与上一代机型相比，三星对摄像头进行了一些微调，但并未做出重大改动。前置摄像头拍摄效果不错，不过锐化处理得略微过头了。 视频可支持以30帧/秒的帧率录制Ultra HD格式；若想使用60帧/秒，则需切换至全高清（Full HD）模式。
后置摄像头的成像质量稳健，但考虑到三星为Galaxy A57 5G定位的价格区间，这还不够理想。在我们的测试样张中，我们注意到图像中的高光区域有时会出现过曝，而且景深表现还有提升空间。 不过，我们很喜欢它的色彩校准效果。变焦仅支持数字变焦，在4倍放大范围内尚可使用；但超过这个倍数后，画质会急剧下降，10倍变焦时已达到极限。
额外的超广角镜头虽为12 MPix，但细节不足，边缘区域会出现像素化现象。第三个镜头是性能较弱的微距镜头，成像效果仅属一般。
Galaxy A57支持以30 FPS录制Ultra HD视频，或以最高60 FPS录制Full HD视频。 通过慢动作功能可实现更高的帧率（240 FPS），但分辨率仅限于720p。光学防抖功能能有效减少相机抖动，麦克风录制的音频也相当清晰。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light
在受控的照明条件下，三星 Galaxy A57 5G 的色彩显示自然，没有异常。
我们的测试图表在中心区域呈现得清晰锐利——但不会过于锐利——然而越往边缘，画面就越模糊。
配件与保修——Galaxy A57 简约版包装内容
三星 Galaxy A57 仅随附一条 USB 数据线（两端均为 Type-C 接口）和一枚 SIM 卡弹出针。三星在其官方网店提供可选的手机壳和电源适配器，第三方供应商也提供兼容的配件。
在德国，该机的保修期为24个月，可通过购买Care+保险套餐延长保修期，该套餐两年费用为99或119欧元，具体金额取决于保障范围；后者还涵盖盗窃和丢失。此外，用户也可选择每月支付5或6欧元。
输入与操作——板载光学指纹传感器
Galaxy A57 的电容式触摸屏滑动体验极佳，且能在整个屏幕范围内精准识别输入。光学指纹传感器集成在显示屏中，位置紧邻底部边缘。只要手指在传感器上停留时间足够长，识别率就相当不错，不过响应速度还可以再快一点。 此外，还提供了一种安全性较低的前置摄像头解锁方式。
线性振动马达能提供清晰的震动反馈，并在设置中支持多种自定义方式。功能键也可根据个人需求进行优化，并可作为传统的电源键使用。
显示屏——三星继续在低频下采用PWM技术
三星 Galaxy A57 的显示屏在规格上与 A56 基本相同，我们的测量结果也证实了这一点。背光效果极佳，亮度可达到相当高的水平；我们测得的峰值亮度为1,980 cd/m²。虽然这一表现不错，但竞品机型的屏幕亮度明显更高。
Galaxy A57 的 Super AMOLED 面板采用脉冲宽度调制（PWM）技术来控制亮度。虽然在最低亮度下调制幅度保持平稳，但频率仅为 240 Hz，因此对光敏感的用户在长时间使用时可能会感到不适。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1135 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.72}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.08
CCT: 6578 K
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8" | Honor 600 AMOLED, 2728x1264, 6.6" | Google Pixel 10a pOLED, 2424x1080, 6.3" | Nothing Phone (4a) AMOLED, 2720x1224, 6.8" | Motorola Edge 70 Fusion AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 83% | 188% | 54% | -27% | 92% | |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1920 | 3582 87% | 3102 62% | 3050 59% | 1455 -24% | 3775 97% |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1980 | 3538 79% | 8192 314% | 2925 48% | 1403 -29% | 3685 86% |
| Response Times | 22% | 13% | -1% | -190% | -7% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 1.21 ? | 0.8 ? 34% | 1.06 ? 12% | 1.42 ? -17% | 8.18 ? -576% | 1.4 ? -16% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 1.1 ? | 0.952 ? 13% | 1 ? 9% | 1.07 ? 3% | 0.99 ? 10% | 1.2 ? -9% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 240 | 120 | 60 | 240 | 90 | 120 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 16.72 | 13.45 20% | 13.86 17% | 14.71 12% | 17.49 -5% | 16 4% |
| Screen | 1% | -53% | 27% | -26% | -9% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1135 | 1107 -2% | 1787 57% | 2205 94% | 1536 35% | 1501 32% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1134 | 1110 -2% | 1538 36% | 1476 30% | ||
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 99 | 97 -2% | 97 -2% | 96 -3% | ||
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 1 41% | 1.9 -12% | 1.4 18% | 2.6 -53% | 1.52 11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.5 | 2.7 -8% | 5.3 -112% | 2.3 8% | 5.7 -128% | 3.47 -39% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.7 -21% | 3.4 -143% | 1.6 -14% | 2 -43% | 2.6 -86% |
| Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.25 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.24 98% | 2.184 101% |
| CCT | 6578 99% | 6498 100% | 6874 95% | 6715 97% | 6878 95% | 6444 101% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 35% /
22% | 49% /
23% | 27% /
23% | -81% /
-71% | 25% /
10% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 16.72 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7753 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在固定缩放级别下，采用不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（尽管在最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来呈平坦状，但这实际上是缩放比例造成的。信息框中显示的是最低亮度下振幅曲线的放大图。）
在 Galaxy A57 的设置中选择“自然”显示模式时，Calman 认证该款三星智能手机能够实现准确的色彩还原。在默认的“鲜艳”模式下，屏幕显示的色调明显偏冷。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.543 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.5595 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.59 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.622 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31 ms). | ||
在户外，Galaxy A57 的表现相当出色。在大多数光线条件下，屏幕内容依然清晰易读，不过在阳光明媚的日子里，亮度或许可以再高一些。
该面板的可视角度稳定性良好，但即使视角稍有变化，亮度也会明显下降，同时还会出现明显的蓝调色偏。
性能——Galaxy A57 搭载 Exynos 1680 处理器
Galaxy A57 5G 搭载了三星自主研发的 SoC—— Exynos 1680。该机型最高可支持 8 GB LPDDR5x 内存——而 512 GB 版本甚至配备了 12 GB 内存。这使得该智能手机在日常使用中表现出色。
其 CPU 在多核性能方面表现尤为出色，比 Exynos 1580（前代机型所采用的芯片）高出16%。在AI加速方面，1680属于中端水平。
| Antutu v11 - Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Average of class Smartphone (584158 - 4273120, n=36, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1) | |
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=149, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1) | |
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1) | |
| AImark - Score v3.x | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1) | |
| AI Benchmark - Score V5 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1) | |
图形计算由集成的 Xclipse 550负责。尽管它比 Adreno 810要领先许多，但其性能仍明显逊于 Adreno 722。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
Galaxy A57 的浏览器性能表现良好，上网体验非常流畅。
| Jetstream 2 | |
| 2.0 Total | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (63.9 - 423, n=123, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion (Chrome 146) | |
| 2.2 Total | |
| Google Pixel 10a (Chrome 149) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149) | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) (Chrome 147) | |
| Honor 600 (Chrome 149) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (49.3 - 733, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1) | |
| Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.06 - 45.5, n=99, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1) | |
| WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (56 - 306, n=108, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 5 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23 - 104, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2800 - 126661, n=154, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=132, last 2 years) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 1680 (n=1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147) | |
* ... smaller is better
这款三星智能手机配备的高速 UFS 3.1 存储器虽然速度很快，但比采用此类存储器的普通智能手机稍慢一些，尤其是在写入小数据块时。不过，在日常使用中，这一点并不会造成明显的问题。
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | Honor 600 | Google Pixel 10a | Nothing Phone (4a) | Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 29% | 81% | 49% | 47% | 82% | 37% | 68% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 1683.07 | 2067.34 23% | 1986.99 18% | 1689.27 0% | 2003.93 19% | 2049.4 22% | 1771 ? 5% | 2241 ? 33% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 1119.11 | 1942.35 74% | 1807.77 62% | 826.38 -26% | 1596.2 43% | 1825.9 63% | 1233 ? 10% | 1924 ? 72% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 249.83 | 366.17 47% | 353.95 42% | 326.53 31% | 263.22 5% | 351.2 41% | 289 ? 16% | 312 ? 25% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 149.04 | 108.21 -27% | 451 203% | 430.37 189% | 325.75 119% | 452.1 203% | 321 ? 115% | 362 ? 143% |
游戏——不适合发烧友
使用GameBench，我们在三星Galaxy A57 5G上测试了几款精选游戏——这款手机并非专为游戏而生的性能怪兽。虽然测试中获得的帧率表现始终稳定良好，但通常需要降低画质等级，否则甚至无法启用更高的显示质量。 例如，《绝地求生》中无法启用“超高清”画质设置，《原神》会出现卡顿现象，且在高帧率运行时，手机会变得非常烫手。
对于A57来说，休闲游戏完全不成问题，但喜欢玩第一人称射击游戏或画面要求较高的游戏的用户，恐怕不会对这款三星手机完全满意。
排放量——Exynos 1680 几乎未减少排放
温度
在持续高负载运行下，Galaxy A57 的表面温度可能会显著升高，导致设备的大面积区域温度升至 40 °C 以上；不过，这种情况既不会让人感到不适，也不必担心。
在 3DMark 压力测试中，其表现基本保持稳定，性能仅有轻微下降；在最新的 Steel Nomad Light 测试中，性能表现甚至十分稳定。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
演讲者
尽管这款智能手机机身纤薄，但三星Galaxy A57上的两个扬声器仍能提供不错的音质。不过，低音略显单薄，且在最大音量下，声音会变得相当刺耳。
一如既往，三星在蓝牙编解码器方面略显吝啬，但该机确实支持SSC。借助“双音频”功能，您可以同时连接两副耳机或两组扬声器，不过此时仅使用SBC编解码器。有线耳机可通过USB接口连接。
Samsung Galaxy A57 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel 10a audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间——Galaxy A57 配备 5,000 mAh 电池
功耗
在满载运行且屏幕亮度调至最低时，Galaxy A57 的功耗处于合理水平，但在屏幕亮度调至最大时，功耗会略有增加。
这款三星智能手机仅支持通过数据线充电，最大充电功率为 45 瓦。在我们的测试中，电池充满电共耗时 71 分钟。
| Off / Standby |   0.07 / 0.56 Watt |
| Idle |  0.71 / 1.94 / 2.04 Watt |
| Load |
6.19 / 13.67 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max 8500 mAh | Honor 600 6400 mAh | Google Pixel 10a 5100 mAh | Nothing Phone (4a) 5080 mAh | Average Samsung Exynos 1680 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 1% | -35% | 34% | -16% | 0% | 5% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 0.71 | 1.19 -68% | 1.24 -75% | 0.7 1% | 0.97 -37% | 0.71 ? -0% | 0.875 ? -23% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.94 | 1.23 37% | 2.28 -18% | 0.94 52% | 2.07 -7% | 1.94 ? -0% | 1.477 ? 24% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 2.04 | 1.43 30% | 2.3 -13% | 1.03 50% | 2.13 -4% | 2.04 ? -0% | 1.663 ? 18% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 6.19 | 6.8 -10% | 6.19 ? -0% | 6.76 ? -9% | |||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 13.67 | 11.45 16% | 13.7 ? -0% | 11.3 ? 17% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗：Geekbench（150 cd/m²）
功耗：GFXbench（150 cd/m²）
电池续航时间
三星 Galaxy A57 的电池续航时间出人意料地短，尤其是与前代机型相比——尽管两者的电池容量相同，但 A57 的续航时间却明显更短。
在此次对比中，A57 排名垫底。希望三星能在未来的更新中解决这个问题。
| Samsung Galaxy A57 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max 8500 mAh | Honor 600 6400 mAh | Google Pixel 10a 5100 mAh | Nothing Phone (4a) 5080 mAh | Motorola Edge 70 Fusion 7000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A56 5G 5000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 14% | 52% | 34% | 21% | 38% | 31% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 39.8 | 35.2 -12% | 39.3 -1% | 52.9 33% | |||
| H.264 (h) | 26.8 | 32 19% | 41.8 56% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 14.9 | 19.8 33% | 22.6 52% | 20 34% | 18 21% | 24.5 64% | 20 34% |
| Load (h) | 3.6 | 4.2 17% | 5.4 50% | 3.6 0% |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
三星 Galaxy A57 5G 凭借其精良的做工、稳定的日常性能以及长期的软件支持给人留下了深刻印象，但由于续航能力较差、相较前代机型改进有限，以及建议零售价偏高，未能充分发挥其潜力。
Samsung Galaxy A57
- 07/09/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: 可能方案的比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 81.5%  | Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 550 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 589€ | 179 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI Super AMOLED |
2. 85.4%  | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC11 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: $462.65 List Price: 470€ | 218 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED |
3. 82.8%  | Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 722 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 650€ | 185 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.57" 2728x1264 458 PPI AMOLED |
4. 85.3%  | Google Pixel 10a Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 549€ | 183 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.30" 2424x1080 421 PPI pOLED |
5. 78.6%  | Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 429€ | 204.5 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" 2720x1224 440 PPI AMOLED |
6. 77.4%  | Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 420€ | 193 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
