OPPO Reno 16 FS 评测
对于一款中端手机来说，700 美元是个不小的数目，因此 OPPO Reno 16 FS 最好能提供相当多的亮点。
在摄像头方面，它配备了优质的传感器，还搭载了一颗不错的自拍摄像头。 此外，得益于独立的长焦镜头，主摄像头的变焦功能相当实用。
该机提供了相当可观的存储空间，并配备了 microSD 卡槽——这一功能在如今的设备上已越来越少见。不过，以这个价位而言，其 SoC 的运行速度显然太慢了。
电池续航表现稳健，但并未创下任何新纪录。屏幕亮度足够，但在低亮度下需忍受 PWM 闪烁现象。
对于正在纠结是选择 Oppo Reno 16 F 还是 Reno 16 FS 的用户，这两款机型的唯一区别在于存储配置。因此，本评测的结论在很大程度上也适用于 Oppo Reno 16 F。
Pros
Cons
价格与供货情况
OPPO Reno 16 FS 在 amazon.com 上的售价超过 1,000 美元。
此时，您不妨考虑选择内存较小但价格低得多的 OPPO Reno 16 F。
规格
外壳与功能——空间设计
在 Reno 16 FS 的设计上，OPPO 采用了太空主题，白色款机身背面印有带有闪粉效果的行星图案，倾斜时会呈现流动效果。 紫黑色版本的摄像头模组上点缀着闪烁的星星。
手机本身做工扎实，采用金属边框。不过，在扭动机身时会发出明显的吱吱声。
唯一的存储配置为 8 GB 内存和 512 GB 机身存储。若您不需要如此大的存储空间，可选择 Oppo Reno 16 F，该机型在设计上与 Reno 16 FS 完全一致。
存储空间可通过 microSD 卡槽进行扩展，在我们的测试中，该卡槽读写速度相当快。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Oppo Reno16 FS (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5.72 - 58.9, n=56, last 2 years) | |
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
通信与操作——Wi-Fi 速度慢及众多移动通信频段
Wi-Fi 6 是 OPPO 在这款智能手机中采用的最新 Wi-Fi 标准。这意味着无法使用拥塞较少的 6 GHz 频段，且网速——最高仅为 421 Mbit/s——相当低，尤其是与同价位竞品相比。
它支持广泛的 4G 和 5G 频段，使 OPPO Reno 16 FS 能够在许多国家使用。
触摸屏在日常使用中非常可靠。 屏幕下方隐藏着一个指纹传感器；其位置较低，只需设置一次，即可非常快速且可靠地解锁手机。
还支持通过前置摄像头进行人脸识别。该功能同样运行稳定，但由于仅采用2D识别技术匹配面部数据，安全性稍逊一筹。
| Networking | |
| Oppo Reno16 FS | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Honor 600 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| OnePlus 15T | |
| iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| Apple iPhone 17e | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
软件与可持续发展——持久的更新承诺
OPPO预装了Android 16系统，并在其基础上搭载了自家的ColorOS 16。界面清晰简洁，功能丰富。
值得庆幸的是，OPPO承诺提供长期支持：该手机将持续获得系统更新直至2032年——距其上市整整6年之久。
包装采用无塑料设计；除此之外，暂无关于该产品可持续性的其他信息。
相机——图像质量良好，但在黑暗环境下除外
OPPO Reno 16 FS 的相机系统功能相当全面，制造商为其配备了一颗性能不错的主摄像头、一支支持变焦的长焦镜头，以及一颗广角摄像头——尽管其分辨率略低。
主摄像头拍摄的照片清晰锐利，且具有高动态范围。10倍变焦拍摄的照片虽然仍可使用，但应确保光线充足。总体而言，该摄像头系统的弱光表现是其唯一的真正短板。
前置摄像头拍摄的自拍照清晰锐利，其出色的色彩还原能力也令人印象深刻。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
PflanzeUmgebungLow LightWeitwinkel
显示屏——亮度足以满足日常使用需求
OPPO Reno 16 FS 的屏幕亮度远超 1,000 cd/m²。这对于大多数日常使用场景来说应该足够了，即使是在光线明亮的房间或户外也是如此。
色彩还原效果良好，足以满足日常使用需求，不过专业人士可能希望色彩表现能更精准一些。
制造商采用的 AMOLED 屏幕依赖 PWM 技术来调节亮度：在最低亮度下，我们测得闪烁频率约为 92 Hz。因此，对此敏感的用户在购买前应先测试手机屏幕。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.27 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}
134.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.274
CCT: 6850 K
| Oppo Reno16 FS AMOLED, 2372x1080, 6.6" | Honor 600 AMOLED, 2728x1264, 6.6" | OnePlus 15T OLED, 2640x1216, 6.3" | Apple iPhone 17e OLED, 2532x1170, 6.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 321% | 82% | -12% | |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1306 | 3102 138% | 1745 34% | 1154 -12% |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1359 | 8192 503% | 3125 130% | 1203 -11% |
| Response Times | 25% | -212% | -96% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 1.7 ? | 1.06 ? 38% | 12.4 ? -629% | 4.3 ? -153% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 1.4 ? | 1 ? 29% | 1.2 ? 14% | 3.4 ? -143% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 92 | 60 | 120.7 | 60 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 15 | 13.86 8% | 18 -20% | 14 7% |
| Screen | 20% | 6% | 29% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1143 | 1787 56% | 1119 -2% | 837 -27% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.27 | 1.9 42% | 2.22 32% | 1.23 62% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.49 | 5.3 18% | 5.18 20% | 2.67 59% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 3.4 -36% | 3.2 -28% | 2 20% |
| Gamma | 2.274 97% | 2.25 98% | 2.243 98% | 2.246 98% |
| CCT | 6850 95% | 6874 95% | 7147 91% | 6486 100% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1101 | 835 | ||
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 96 | 99 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 122% /
88% | -41% /
-50% | -26% /
-22% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 92 Hz Amplitude: 15 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 92 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 92 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7625 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在固定缩放级别下、不同亮度设置下的测量数据序列（尽管在最低亮度下振幅曲线看起来平坦，但这只是缩放比例造成的。信息框中显示的是最低亮度下振幅的放大图。）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航——SoC 性能较弱
联发科天玑7300对于这一价位的智能手机来说是个不寻常的选择；实际上，它更常见于售价在400美元左右的机型。因此，在性能方面，Reno 16 FS往往无法与同价位竞品抗衡。
在日常使用中，菜单导航通常很流畅，但稍具挑战性的应用程序会将手机推至性能极限。
在长时间高负载运行下，SoC会明显发热，不过3DMark压力测试显示性能并未受到影响。
扬声器系统由底部边缘的专用扬声器和作为辅助输出的听筒组成。 因此，OPPO Reno 16 FS 虽非低音强机，但仍能呈现出悦耳且无失真的音质。蓝牙音频传输支持最常见的编解码器。
6,500 mAh 的电池在中端机型中已不再罕见。 凭借这块电池，OPPO Reno 16 FS 在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中实现了 23 小时 21 分钟的续航时间。这轻松足以满足一到两个工作日的使用需求。该手机支持最高 45 瓦的快充，充满电仅需不到 2 小时。
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 185, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 15T | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Oppo Reno16 FS | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (18 - 38, n=18) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| OnePlus 15T | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 378, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (36 - 42, n=18) | |
| Oppo Reno16 FS | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| OnePlus 15T | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 154, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (6.2 - 24, n=18) | |
| Oppo Reno16 FS | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| OnePlus 15T | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 151, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (14 - 17, n=18) | |
| Oppo Reno16 FS | |
| 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| OnePlus 15T | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.54 - 72, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (5 - 7.4, n=18) | |
| Oppo Reno16 FS | |
| Oppo Reno16 FS | Honor 600 | OnePlus 15T | Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 8% | 103% | -11% | 6% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 1902.3 | 1986.99 4% | 4115.87 116% | 1878 ? -1% | 2289 ? 20% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 1795.4 | 1807.77 1% | 4076.12 127% | 1406 ? -22% | 1981 ? 10% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 306 | 353.95 16% | 578.74 89% | 291 ? -5% | 316 ? 3% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 402.6 | 451 12% | 721.05 79% | 345 ? -14% | 363 ? -10% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Oppo Reno16 FS | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Apple iPhone 17e | |
| OnePlus 15T | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Oppo Reno16 FS | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Apple iPhone 17e | |
| OnePlus 15T | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Apple iPhone 17e | |
| Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability | |
| Apple iPhone 17e | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Oppo Reno16 FS | |
| Apple iPhone 17e | |
Oppo Reno16 FS audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Honor 600 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
| Off / Standby |   0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Idle |  0.9 / 1.2 / 1.6 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Oppo Reno16 FS 6500 mAh | Honor 600 6400 mAh | Apple iPhone 17e 4005 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -57% | 0% | -20% | -9% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 0.9 | 1.24 -38% | 0.9 -0% | 1.061 ? -18% | 0.894 ? 1% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.2 | 2.28 -90% | 1.2 -0% | 1.531 ? -28% | 1.488 ? -24% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 1.6 | 2.3 -44% | 1.6 -0% | 1.812 ? -13% | 1.683 ? -5% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 6.9 | 4.4 ? | 6.85 ? | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 12.2 | 7.95 ? | 10.7 ? |
* ... smaller is better
| Oppo Reno16 FS 6500 mAh | Honor 600 6400 mAh | OnePlus 15T 7500 mAh | Apple iPhone 17e 4005 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 23.4 | 22.6 -3% | 34.3 47% | 19.4 -17% |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
厂商定价偏高。
不过，如果你能以更低的价格买到 OPPO Reno 16 FS，它将为你提供出色的摄像头系统和良好的电池续航能力。
Oppo Reno16 FS
- 09/24/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可能替代方案的比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 76%  | Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 649€ | 196 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.57" 2372x1080 397 PPI AMOLED |
2. 82.8%  | Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 722 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: $729.00 List Price: 650€ | 185 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.57" 2728x1264 458 PPI AMOLED |
3. 86%  | OnePlus 15T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $859.00 OnePlus 15R, 12GB RAM + 512G... 2. $1,819.00 OnePlus 15 Dual-SIM 512GB RO... 3. $402.80 Google Pixel 10a - 30+ Hours... List Price: 600€ | 194 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.32" 2640x1216 460 PPI OLED |
4. 84%  | Apple iPhone 17e Apple A19 ⎘ Apple A19 4-Core GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe | List Price: 699 Euro | 170 g | 256 GB NVMe | 6.10" 2532x1170 460 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
