三星Galaxy A37 5G评测总结
在我们的评测中，三星Galaxy A37 5G 给人的印象是一款扎实的中端智能手机，尽管与前代机型相比，它仅提供了少数几项新功能。这些新功能包括更快的运行内存和全新的 SoC：Exynos 1480。 在所有基准测试中，后者均优于Galaxy A36所搭载的骁龙处理器，并提供了流畅的系统性能，尽管在运行高负载游戏时仍略显吃力。内存性能也因SoC的更换而得到提升，尽管仍采用UFS 3.1，但速度提升了约100%。
不过，Galaxy A37这款价格亲民的入门级版本仅配备6 GB内存和128 GB存储空间。 我们认为在2026年这已显不足，尤其是考虑到该机不支持microSD卡扩展。更何况这款智能手机的设计初衷是长寿命，不仅提供长达六年的系统更新支持，还加入了三星的“自助维修计划”。
相机方面仅进行了微小调整，与竞争对手相比还远远不够。这不仅体现在新增的镜头上，也体现在主摄像头方面。前置摄像头则表现突出，甚至支持UHD视频录制。
A37的电池容量为5,000 mAh，在同类竞品中容量最小，但在测试中，这款三星手机表现出了极高的能效，依然能提供持久的续航时间。 在快充方面，三星同样没有追求最极端的规格，但使用兼容的45瓦充电器，该手机可在70分钟内充满电。
在连接性方面，Galaxy A37表现令人印象深刻，其5G和Wi-Fi 6功能提供了坚实的基础，并辅以出色的通话质量。不过，目前尚不支持Auracast功能。 不过，三星有可能通过未来的系统更新添加这一功能。
以官方建议零售价来看，Galaxy A37的价格偏高，尤其是如果你计划长期使用这款手机，选择更贵的256 GB版本会更划算。 不过，目前该手机价格已大幅下降，不仅因为价格因素，更因其强大的核心功能，这款手机绝对值得推荐。
Pros
Cons
价格和供货情况
Galaxy A37 5G 现已在三星官方商城直接发售，提供 6GB+128GB 和 8GB+256GB 两种配置，建议零售价分别为 450 美元和 540 美元。在亚马逊上的售价则低得多。
产品规格：三星Galaxy A37 5G
机身与功能——三星手机现已具备防水功能
三星Galaxy A37 5G 的尺寸与前代机型相同，正面和背面均采用康宁大猩猩 Victus+ 玻璃进行保护。塑料边框几乎不会影响其整体的良好印象。 机身做工精良，握持手感舒适。虽然在扭曲测试中会出现轻微弯曲，但Galaxy A37并未发出任何异响。
虽然 Galaxy A36 仍采用骁龙SoC，但A37现已转用三星自研的 Exynos 1480。此外，这款智能手机现已通过IP68认证，具备完全的防水防尘能力。遗憾的是，新的高光背板非常容易留下指纹。
通信 -Galaxy A37，通话质量良好
三星Galaxy A37 5G支持所有当前的移动通信标准，包括5G Sub-6，其频段覆盖范围广泛但并非全面。虽然它支持高速Wi-Fi 6标准，但不支持6 GHz频段。
这款智能手机的通话质量尤为突出，在我们的测试中，通话声音非常自然，甚至能可靠地过滤掉嘈杂的环境噪音。此外，它不仅支持两张nano-SIM卡，还支持最多两张eSIM卡，既可作为替代方案，也可采用混合模式使用。
| Networking | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
摄像头——三摄组合，支持超高清视频录制
相机配置与 Galaxy A36相比几乎没有变化，但主摄像头现已支持HDR视频，且像素尺寸更大（1.0 µm），这有望在弱光环境下提升成像质量。
我们证实了这一点。视频画面现在更加均匀，但略显模糊。在日光下拍摄的视频略显过亮，有时甚至容易出现过曝；在这方面，竞品的表现更为出色。
| 宽高比 | 分辨率 | |
|---|---|---|
| 照片 | 4:3 / 16:9 / 1:1 / 全屏 | 12 / 50 MPix |
| 视频（主摄像头） | 16:9 / 1:1 / 全屏 | HD（30 FPS）全高清（30 / 60 FPS）超高清 (30帧/秒) |
| 视频（前置摄像头） | 16:9 / 1:1 / 全景 | 高清 (30帧/秒)全高清 (30帧/秒)超高清 (30帧/秒) |
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
显示屏——亮度较高，但比竞争对手稍暗
三星Galaxy A37 5G的Super AMOLED显示屏看似与前代机型没有变化，但测量数据显示，其HDR峰值亮度略有下降，色彩准确度也略有减弱。不过，在日常使用中并不会察觉到这一点。
遗憾的是，A37仍采用低频PWM调光技术，因此对光线敏感的用户在长时间使用时可能会感到不适。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center on Battery: 1127 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.6 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
99.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.06
CCT: 6496 K
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8" | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro AMOLED, 2756x1268, 6.6" | Motorola Edge 70 Fusion AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 37% | 92% | 108% | |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1839 | 1953 6% | 3475 89% | 3775 105% |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1752 | 2922 67% | 3406 94% | 3685 110% |
| Response Times | 4% | 19% | 9% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 1.57 ? | 1.4 ? 11% | 1.11 ? 29% | 1.4 ? 11% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 1.39 ? | 1.4 ? -1% | 1.05 ? 24% | 1.2 ? 14% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 240 | 120.5 | 120 | 120 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 16.58 | 16 3% | 16.04 3% | 16 3% |
| Screen | 1% | 38% | 35% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1127 | 1155 2% | 1104 -2% | 1501 33% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 2.42 7% | 1.2 54% | 1.52 42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.3 | 5.63 -6% | 2.4 55% | 3.47 35% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 3.7 -0% | 2.1 43% | 2.6 30% |
| Gamma | 2.06 107% | 2.246 98% | 2.22 99% | 2.184 101% |
| CCT | 6496 100% | 7263 89% | 6472 100% | 6444 101% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1136 | 1102 | 1476 | |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 97 | 97 | 96 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 14% /
10% | 50% /
43% | 51% /
43% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 16.58 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7784 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列（在最低亮度下，振幅曲线看起来很平坦，但这是由于缩放比例造成的。信息框中显示的是最低亮度下振幅的放大图。）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7115 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6765 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.57 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7655 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.8085 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航时间
| Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 1480 (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 7% | 43% | 74% | 29% | 55% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 1986.3 | 945 -52% | 3576.86 80% | 2049.4 3% | 1771 ? -11% | 2242 ? 13% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 1732.34 | 837.4 -52% | 3565.14 106% | 1825.9 5% | 1234 ? -29% | 1924 ? 11% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 368.9 | 184 -50% | 324.76 -12% | 351.2 -5% | 289 ? -22% | 309 ? -16% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 115.25 | 326.1 183% | 112.05 -3% | 452.1 292% | 322 ? 179% | 361 ? 213% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
在我们的评测中，三星Galaxy A37 5G凭借其精良的做工、出色的日常使用体验、持久的电池续航以及非常不错的通话质量给人留下了深刻印象；然而，与前代机型相比，它在创新方面寥寥无几，且在摄像头和显示屏方面落后于竞争对手。
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
- 06/25/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: 替代方案一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 79%  | Samsung Galaxy A37 5G Samsung Exynos 1480 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 530 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 519€ | 196 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI Super AMOLED |
2. 77.6%  | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.2 | Amazon: List Price: 400€ | 210 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED |
3. 83.8%  | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500 ⎘ ARM Mali-G720 MP8 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 400€ | 202 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.59" 2756x1268 460 PPI AMOLED |
4. 77.4%  | Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 420€ | 193 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
