Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser
ⓘ Daniel Schmidt

设计出众的隐藏精品 - Nothing Phone (4a) Pro 评测

皇家中产阶级

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro 结合了引人注目的设计、强大的中端硬件和现代功能。在测试中,这款智能手机明亮的 OLED 显示屏、稳定的电池续航时间、Snapdragon 性能和潜望镜摄像头给人留下了深刻印象,但也暴露出了一些弱点。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

关于 Nothing Phone (4a) Pro 的评价

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro 是一款与众不同的中端智能手机,它注重设计,具有稳定的日常性能和一些令人惊喜的高端功能。尤其值得注意的是高品质铝合金一体成型机身、独特的字形背面以及 Wi-Fi 6E 和 eSIM 支持等现代附加功能。

在日常使用中,这款智能手机凭借明亮的 OLED 显示屏、出色的电池续航能力以及骁龙 SoC 带来的稳定性能给人留下了深刻印象。相机功能也让它从众多竞争对手中脱颖而出:尤其是潜望镜变焦功能,在中档手机中效果出众,是一个独特的卖点。

不过,也有一些批评意见:尽管该设备采用了高质量的表面处理,但并非完全防水,超广角摄像头的质量也不尽如人意,视频功能与高级机型相比也有差距。此外,Android ,只计划进行三次重大更新,考虑到价格,这多少令人失望。

总而言之,Nothing Phone (4a) Pro 是一款真正的内幕消息,适合那些正在寻找一款引人注目的智能手机、具有良好的功能、强大的电池续航能力和可靠的摄像头的用户,尤其适合那些已经受够了其他制造商典型的千篇一律设计的用户。

Pros

+ 做工精细,设计美观
+ 明亮的 OLED
+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 无无线充电功能
- 不防水
- 主要更新仅三年

价格和供应情况

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro 的零售价为 479 欧元(8/128 GB)或 549 欧元(12/256 GB),可直接从Nothing 购买。网站上直接购买,也可在亚马逊等网站上购买。

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro 是继 手机 (3a) Pro的继任者,它已完全焕然一新,尤其是在视觉效果上,而且还对摄像头设置和新的 SoC 进行了小幅升级。一切尽在我们的评测。

规格:Nothing Phone (4a) Pro

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro (Phone (4) Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB 8c/8t, 1 x 2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, 4 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, 3 x 1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A520, Cortex A520/A720
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.83 inch 20:9, 2800 x 1260 pixel 450 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Color depth: 10 bits, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 218.7 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.4, GSM, UMTS, LTE, 5G, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 163.6 x 76.6
Battery
5080 mAh Lithium-Ion, Battery cycles: 1400
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.9, 24mm) + 50MP (3.5x optical zoom, f/2.9, 80mm) + 8MP (f/2.2, 15mm)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (S5KKD1, f/2.2, 1/3.44", 22 / 26 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Virtual keyboard, USB-C-Cabel, SIM-Tool, Case, Nothing OS 4.1, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, LDAC | GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C), Galileo (E1), QZSS (L1) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+ | DRM Widevine L1 | eSIM | IP65 | Body-SAR: 1.453 W/kg, Head-SAR: 1.281 W/kg | max. charging speed: 50 W (wired), fanless
Released
03/05/2026
Weight
210 g
Price
549 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳和功能 - Phone (4a) Pro 不防水

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro 采用铝制一体成型机身,赋予了这款智能手机高品质的外观,并完善了其与众不同的设计。其他方面的做工也令人印象深刻,缝隙均匀,抗扭刚度高。遗憾的是,(4a) Pro 并非完全防水,只能按照 IP65 标准防止喷水。不过,Nothing 声称已成功测试了手机在 25 厘米深的水下 20 分钟的防水性能。

除了背面的字形矩阵外,其他功能都是同类产品的典型特征,没有任何真正的亮点。它可以显示重要通知,可以进行大量配置,工作方式与 Nothing Phone (3)但 LED 数量较少。

尺寸比较

163.6 mm 76.6 mm 7.9 mm 210 g163.2 mm 78 mm 7.5 mm 194 g161.3 mm 76.6 mm 7.4 mm 190 g156.5 mm 73.3 mm 9.6 mm 191.4 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

通信和操作 - 无智能手机,支持 Wi-Fi 6E 和 eSIM 卡

与前代产品一样,Nothing Phone (4a) Pro 也有一个惊喜:支持三频 Wi-Fi(Wi-Fi 6E),而不仅仅是 Wi-Fi 6。当快速的 6 GHz 网络可用时,数据传输速率也相应较高。

当把智能手机贴在耳边时,语音质量很好,但当噪音很大时,对环境噪音的抑制就会达到极限。支持 WLAN 通话、VoLTE 和 Vo5G 等功能。提供两个 nano-SIM 卡插槽,还可集成 eSIM 卡。可通过两个物理 SIM 卡或混合模式实现双卡双待。

光学指纹传感器集成在显示屏中,用于生物识别安全,可快速、可靠地解锁 Nothing Phone (4a) Pro。还可通过前置摄像头进行人脸识别。线性振动电机可提供清晰的反馈,并可在设置中进行调整。

AI 按钮现在位于左侧,因此不再容易与电源键混淆。所谓的 "Essential Key "可以在设置中进行自定义,但主要用于使用截图和语音备忘录保存支持 AI 的笔记本。

Networking
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1777 (min: 1708) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1567 (min: 1519) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
949 (min: 474) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1006 (min: 504) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1589 (min: 808) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1188 (min: 1151) MBit/s ∼76%
Xiaomi 15T
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
909 (min: 474) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
895 (min: 825) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1475 (min: 452) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1558 (min: 1521) MBit/s ∼99%
Fairphone 6
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1791 (min: 1631) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 1406) MBit/s ∼93%
Average Wi-Fi 6E
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
954 (min: 227) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
940 (min: 442) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1377 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1337 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
699 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
744 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1279 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1402 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼89%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1777 (1708-1839)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1562 (808-1664)
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1567 (1519-1605)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1186 (1151-1206)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø934 (474-967)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø987 (504-1018)

软件和可持续发展 - Nothing Phone (4a) Pro 六年更新期

虽然没有什么典范,但它确实提供了一些可持续发展方面的信息:包装不使用塑料,智能手机使用 100% 的回收铝和锡。不过,没有完整的可持续发展报告。

安全补丁的发布期为六年,但只计划了三次重大更新。

摄像头 - 中档潜望镜变焦

与 Nothing Phone (4a) Pro 自拍
与 Nothing Phone (4a) Pro 自拍

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro 的前置摄像头表现出色,能在日光下拍摄出连贯的照片。但在暗光环境下,它很快就会变得噪点较多,快门延迟也会增加。

背面有两个 5000 万像素的传感器:主传感器和潜望镜变焦都配备了 OIS,在中档产品中效果非常好。后者甚至可以使用 140 倍的数字放大倍率,即使质量不再出色,但这种形式在高端产品中也是绝无仅有的。超广角效果一般。关于这两款相机的更多印象 本文.

后置设置只能以 30 FPS 的速度拍摄 4K 视频,但也可以使用变焦,包括 20 倍数码变焦。如果您满足于全高清,也可以使用 60 FPS 和超广角。在前置方面,只能使用最高 60 FPS 的 1080p。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light
ColorChecker
3.2 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Nothing Phone (4a) Pro: 5.11 ∆E min: 1.53 - max: 10.55 ∆E
ColorChecker
17 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
20 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
13 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Nothing Phone (4a) Pro: 18.41 ∆E min: 6.75 - max: 25.81 ∆E

显示屏 - 采用高频 PWM 的明亮 OLED 显示屏

子像素结构
子像素结构

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro 的显示屏略有增大,现在的尺寸为 6.83 英寸(17.35 厘米)。Nothing 声称户外亮度为 1,600 cd/m²,峰值亮度可达 5,000 cd/m²。我们可以确认前者,但我们无法从这款智能手机上获得接近 5,000 cd/m² 的亮度。

显示屏的基本闪烁频率相当低,仅为 90 Hz,这应该可以通过标称频率为 2,160 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光来补偿。我们可以确认频率较高,但低水平的基本闪烁意味着不能排除敏感用户的投诉。

1577
cd/m²
1579
cd/m²
1537
cd/m²
1589
cd/m²
1604
cd/m²
1571
cd/m²
1625
cd/m²
1608
cd/m²
1575
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1625 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1585 cd/m² Minimum: 2.23 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1604 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.9 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
98.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
CCT: 7083 K
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi 15T
AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"
Fairphone 6
pOLED, 2484x1116, 6.3"
Screen
-25%
-4%
-14%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1604
1136
-29%
1070
-33%
737
-54%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1585
1132
-29%
1079
-32%
736
-54%
Brightness Distribution (%)
95
98
3%
94
-1%
97
2%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.9
3.5
-84%
1.5
21%
1.6
16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.3
5.5
-28%
3.9
9%
3.9
9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.9
2.4
17%
2.5
14%
3
-3%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.02 109%
2.24 98%
2.24 98%
CCT
7083 92%
6322 103%
6648 98%
6706 97%

* ... smaller is better

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3310 cd/m² +107%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1863 cd/m² +17%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1596 cd/m²
Fairphone 6
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1458 cd/m² -9%
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3267 cd/m² +109%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1990 cd/m² +27%
Fairphone 6
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1920 cd/m² +23%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1564 cd/m²

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 90 Hz
Amplitude: 13.58 %
Secondary Frequency: 2173 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7867 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)

灰度(颜色:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(颜色:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(颜色:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(颜色:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(颜色:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(颜色:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.84 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.418 ms rise
↘ 0.4175 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.64 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.307 ms rise
↘ 0.3305 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.2 ms).
户外活动
视角稳定性

性能、排放和电池续航时间 - 配备骁龙 SoC 的 Phone (4a) Pro

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro 配备了 骁龙 7 代 4配备 8GB 或 12GB LPDDR5x 内存,即使在持续负载的情况下也能充分发挥性能。虽然由此产生的表面温度可能较高,但仍在可接受的范围内。

扬声器的音效尚可,但并不突出。电池续航能力则非常出色。此外,还支持高达 50 瓦的有线快速充电。使用合适的电源装置,在测试中充满电需要 67 分钟(50%:22 分钟,80%:38 分钟)。

Geekbench 6.6
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
2118 Points +60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=194, last 2 years)
1831 Points +39%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
1645 Points +25%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288
1320 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB
  (1278 - 1329, n=5)
1308 Points -1%
Fairphone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
1188 Points -10%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
6839 Points +63%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
6178 Points +48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11811, n=194, last 2 years)
5439 Points +30%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288
4188 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB
  (3968 - 4188, n=5)
4052 Points -3%
Fairphone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
3426 Points -18%
3DMark
Wild Life Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB
  (7589 - 7687, n=4)
7633 Points +1%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288
7589 Points
Fairphone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
4376 Points -42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (270 - 7687, n=88, last 2 years)
3152 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
Points -100%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
15464 Points +100%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
13648 Points +77%
Average of class Smartphone
  (271 - 30892, n=177, last 2 years)
12081 Points +56%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288
7722 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB
  (7662 - 7722, n=4)
7682 Points -1%
Fairphone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
4457 Points -42%
Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
4421 Points +111%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
3954 Points +89%
Average of class Smartphone
  (61 - 8263, n=178, last 2 years)
3184 Points +52%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288
2094 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB
  (2062 - 2098, n=4)
2084 Points 0%
Fairphone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
1120 Points -47%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
4142 Points +101%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
3943 Points +91%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 8271, n=177, last 2 years)
3168 Points +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB
  (2042 - 2104, n=4)
2072 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288
2063 Points
Fairphone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
1130 Points -45%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
119 fps +78%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
84 fps +25%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288
67 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB
  (54 - 67, n=4)
61.8 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 166, n=189, last 2 years)
61.7 fps -8%
Fairphone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
47 fps -30%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
156 fps +59%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
144 fps +47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 378, n=189, last 2 years)
129.3 fps +32%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288
98 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB
  (86 - 98, n=4)
92.5 fps -6%
Fairphone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
55 fps -44%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
108 fps +163%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
53 fps +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 144, n=190, last 2 years)
49.8 fps +21%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288
41 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB
  (34 - 41, n=4)
38.5 fps -6%
Fairphone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
29 fps -29%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
84 fps +133%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
55 fps +53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 151, n=189, last 2 years)
49.6 fps +38%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288
36 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB
  (33 - 38, n=4)
36 fps 0%
Fairphone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
21 fps -42%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
34 fps +113%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
25 fps +56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.54 - 62, n=190, last 2 years)
22.7 fps +42%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288
16 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB
  (15 - 16, n=4)
15.5 fps -3%
Fairphone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
9.1 fps -43%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
998 Points +262%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5210, n=98, last 2 years)
698 Points +153%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
324 Points +17%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288
276 Points
Fairphone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
240 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB
  (168 - 276, n=4)
234 Points -15%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
6833 Points +2376%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=98, last 2 years)
2779 Points +907%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
342 Points +24%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288
276 Points
Fairphone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
241 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB
  (165 - 276, n=4)
233 Points -16%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
8965 Points +1312%
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=98, last 2 years)
4119 Points +549%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1096 Points +73%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288
635 Points
Fairphone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
547 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB
  (371 - 635, n=4)
533 Points -16%
CrossMark
Overall
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
1243 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (376 - 2856, n=110, last 2 years)
1212 Points +12%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288
1081 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB
  (1009 - 1081, n=3)
1037 Points -4%
Fairphone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
774 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
Points -100%
Productivity
Average of class Smartphone
  (388 - 2366, n=110, last 2 years)
1102 Points +26%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
882 Points +1%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288
874 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB
  (823 - 874, n=3)
846 Points -3%
Fairphone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
821 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
Points -100%
Creativity
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
1172 Points +49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (310 - 2123, n=110, last 2 years)
1003 Points +27%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288
788 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB
  (766 - 788, n=3)
774 Points -2%
Fairphone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
696 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
Points -100%
Responsiveness
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288
5275 Points
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
5003 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB
  (4362 - 5275, n=3)
4796 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (466 - 13042, n=110, last 2 years)
3592 Points -32%
Fairphone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
889 Points -83%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
Points -100%
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
210.247 Points +4%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288
203.079 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB
  (132.2 - 203, n=3)
169.4 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (59.7 - 423, n=129, last 2 years)
158.5 Points -22%
Fairphone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192
153.316 Points -25%
Nothing Phone (4a) ProSamsung Galaxy S25 FEXiaomi 15TFairphone 6Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
15%
-27%
-2%
-28%
-9%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
1977.37
3756.44
90%
1954.45
-1%
1973.22
0%
1768 ?(950 - 3497, n=120)
-11%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
1738.18
2450.19
41%
1879.62
8%
2006.71
15%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
409.28
382.44
-7%
278.9
-32%
358.89
-12%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
547.62
198.68
-64%
89.68
-84%
487.48
-11%
Max. Load
 46.7 °C48.2 °C47.4 °C 
 47.6 °C47.9 °C47.2 °C 
 45 °C46.1 °C44.4 °C 
Maximum: 48.2 °C
Average: 46.7 °C
43.4 °C45.2 °C45.3 °C
42 °C44.7 °C43.6 °C
42.5 °C44 °C44.2 °C
Maximum: 45.3 °C
Average: 43.9 °C
Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.7 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 %
Fairphone 6
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.8 % -1%
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
96.3 % -3%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.4 % -46%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97.7 %
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
77.3 % -21%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.8 % -45%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Fairphone 6
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % +1%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.2 %
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
88.5 % -10%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.7 % -39%
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø12.5 (12.3-12.6)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø16.4 (13.9-25.8)
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø45.7 (45.6-45.8)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø57.8 (47.6-89.1)
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø5.75 (5.67-5.77)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø9.81 (8.65-14.5)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.338.22530.324.4312724.94039.836.95042.341.16324258023.627.310021.226.912520.440.116022.651.520019.850.325017.851.531514.956.340016.253.650014.560.963012.965.580012.869100011.269.8125012.176.3160011.980.8200011.479.525001279.3315012.179.7400013.378.8500013.171.1630012.971.8800013731000012.8761250012.874.31600014.258.5SPL25.388.9N0.771.8median 13median 71.1Delta1.910.336.939.235.438.227.543.228.438.829.841.923.240.419.540.119.441.720.147.217.652.318.455.715.55812.762.511.462.212.966.711.767.811.374.812.280.213.181.115.178.613.180.11382.513.385.213.379.913.379.513.678.913.678.113.678.313.7741466.725.492.20.791.1median 13.3median 78.11.18.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNothing Phone (4a) ProXiaomi 15T
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi 15T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 146)
18h 00min
Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
5080 mAh
18 h
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
4900 mAh
15.1 h
Xiaomi 15T
5500 mAh
17.2 h
Fairphone 6
4415 mAh
16.5 h

Notebookcheck 总体评分

作为一款时尚的中端智能手机,Nothing Phone (4a) Pro 给人留下了深刻的印象,它拥有强劲的电池、良好的性能和异常强大的潜望镜变焦功能,但在防水保护和更新供应方面却比较薄弱。

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro - 05/07/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
92%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
51 / 69 → 73%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
91%
Games Performance
33 / 55 → 59%
Application Performance
67 / 85 → 79%
AI Performance
19%
Temperature
82%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
79%
Average
74%
83%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
89.7%
Materials
50%
Packaging
95%
Power Use
91.1%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
83.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 74.9%

可比较的替代品

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
82.5%
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 722 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon: List Price: 549€210 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.83"
2800x1260
450 PPI
AMOLED
2.
85.6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
List Price: 809€190 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"
2340x1080
382 PPI
AMOLED
3.
84.8%
Xiaomi 15T
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400 ⎘
ARM Mali-G720 MP7 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon: List Price: 650€194 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.83"
2772x1280
447 PPI
AMOLED
4.
79.2%
Fairphone 6
Fairphone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon: List Price: 599€191.4 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.31"
2484x1116
432 PPI
pOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 设计出众的隐藏精品 - Nothing Phone (4a) Pro 评测
Daniel Schmidt, 2026-05-12 (Update: 2026-05-12)