这款中端智能手机常常让三星等公司显得老气横秋--小米 Poco M8 Pro 5G 评测

Name: Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G
Brand: Xiaomi

性价比就在这里。

小米公司推出的 Poco M8 Pro 5G 正在撼动竞争对手的地位。这款中端智能手机在显示屏和电池方面尤为强劲，但也没有忽视其他功能。通过离线通信，它甚至还拥有一个真正独特的卖点。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 02/16/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

小米 Poco M8 Pro 5G 的评价

小米 Poco M8 Pro 提供了许多值得购买的理由。6500 毫安时电池保证了超长的续航时间，同时不影响重量；真彩 AMOLED 屏幕在这个价位的手机中非常明亮；骁龙 7s 第四代处理器确保了非常稳定的日常性能。相机的拍照效果也不错，更新供应保证到 2031 年，"无线电 "模式在紧急情况下特别有用。

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Poco M8 Pro 不提供 eSIM 支持、长焦相机和使用 microSD 卡扩展内存的选项。HyperOS 2.0 中的广告也很烦人，但至少可以通过相对较小的努力将其去除。

Pros

+ 超长电池寿命

+ 良好的系统性能

+ 明亮的 120 Hz AMOLED 显示屏

+ WiFi 6E 和蓝牙 5.4

+ IP68 认证

+ 出色的摄像头

+ 100 瓦充电

+ 6 年更新

Cons

- 带有广告和臃肿软件的 HyperOS 2.0

- 不支持 eSIM

- 不支持 microSD

- 目前只有Android 15

价格和供应情况

Poco M8 Pro 5G在小米的售价约为 310 欧元（约合人民币 368 元 - 8/256 GB）或 360 欧元（约合人民币 427 元 - 12/512 GB）。在亚马逊，测试时的价格也差不多。

Mr.Shield Screen Protector compatible with XIAOMI Poco M8 Pro 5G [Tempered Glass] [3-PACK] [Japan Glass with 9H Hardness]
Anoowkoa 2 Pack for Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+/Note 15 Pro Plus 5G/Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 3D Screen protector with Camera Lens protector Tempered Glass.9H Hardness.Anti-Fingerprint.No Air-Bubbles.Easy Installation
bemuntee Screen Protector For XIAOMI Poco M8 Pro 5G, [3 Pack] Tempered Glass with 9H Hardness, Anti-Scratch, Bubble-Free

小米 Poco M8 Pro 5G 的评价
规格
外壳 - 大猩猩玻璃、塑料和铝合金的高品质组合
功能 - Poco M8 Pro 5G，最高 512 GB 内存
软件 - HyperOS 2.0 和 2031 年之前的更新
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 6E、蓝牙 5.4 和无线电模式
电话功能和语音质量
摄像头 - 5000 万像素主摄像头，配备 Light Fusion 800
配件和保修 - 100 瓦电源需额外付费
输入设备和操作 - 日常使用绰绰有余
显示屏 - 3000 尼特亮度和高频 PWM 调光
性能 - 配备骁龙 7s 第 4 代处理器的 Poco M8 Pro 5G
Emissions - 配备立体声音效的酷炫 Poco 智能手机
电池寿命--硅碳电池是一张王牌
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可比较的替代品

Poco 智能手机通常以适中的价格提供丰富的性能和功能。新款 Poco M8 Pro 5G 就是这样一款手机。只需不到 300 欧元（约合 356 美元），您就能获得一款配备骁龙 7s Gen 4、AMOLED 显示屏和 6500 毫安时超大电池的 6.83 英寸智能手机。我们的测试表明，这款手机的整体配置是否令人信服。我们还看了它与非常相似的小米Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G在价格和功能方面的比较。

规格

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, 1 x 2.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, 3 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, 4 x 1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A520, Cortex-A720 / A520

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 810

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR4X

Display

6.83 inch 19.5:9, 2772 x 1280 pixel 447 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, 3200 nits peak brightness, HBM 1800 nits brightness, Touch sampling rate up to 480 Hz, Instant touch sampling rate 2560 Hz, 3840 Hz PWM dimming, 12 Bit color depth, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 512 GB

, 468 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic compass, IR blaster, Gyroscope, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, 2x2 MIMO, Wi-Fi Direct, Xiaomi Offline Communication

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/18/19/20/26/28/38/40/41/42/48/66/71), 5G (Band n1/2/3/5/7/8/20/26/28/38/40/41/48/66/71/77/78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.31 x 163.34 x 78.31

Battery

6500 mAh Lithium-Ion, 100W HyperCharge, up to 22.5W reverse charging, Silicon-Carbon-Anode

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Light Fusion 800, f/1.6, 1/1.55" sensor size, 2.0 µm 4-in-1 pixel size, OIS) + 8 MP ultrawide (f/2.2), video recording up to 4K@30fps
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.2, 1/3.6" sensor size, video recording up to 1080p@60fps

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers (Dolby Atmos & Hi-Res Audio support), Keyboard: virtual keyboard, USB-C cable, Protective case, SIM tool, Quick start guide, Warranty Card, HyperOS 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, Gorilla Glass Victus 2 (display), plastic back side, aluminium alloy frame; linear vibration motor; IP66/IP68 certified; USB-C port with exFAT & NTFS support; GPS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C), Galileo (E1), QZSS (L1); Connectivity: Dual Nano SIM, VoLTE/WiFI calling, no eSIM support; Bluetooth codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LHDC V1-V5; HDR support: Dolby Vision, HDR10, HDR10+, HLG; update policy: 4 OS upgrades, 6 years of security updates (EOL 01/2032); Head SAR 0.978 W/kg, Body SAR 0.972 W/kg, fanless, waterproof

Released

01/08/2026

Weight

206 g

Price

400 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳 - 大猩猩玻璃、塑料和铝合金的高品质组合

尽管 Poco M8 Pro 5G 的尺寸令人印象深刻，但重量仅为 206 克（约 7.3 盎司），因此拿在手上相对较轻。虽然背面只有塑料，但外观和做工也很成功。

后盖采用了对称设计，同时还集成了相机模块。由于中央接缝的存在，磨砂后盖对入射光线的反射略有不同。在我们测试的银色机型上，长边上增加了碳素棋盘格纹的黑色边条。其他颜色为黑色和绿色。

带有额外保护膜的显示屏玻璃采用大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 制成，边角略呈圆形。加上四边非常窄的显示屏边缘，使小米手机看起来非常有质感。Poco M8 Pro 5G 采用铝制边框连接正面和背面，并通过了 IP68 防尘防水认证。

尺寸比较

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro OnePlus Nord CE 5 Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Samsung Galaxy A36 5G DIN A6 ❌

功能 - Poco M8 Pro 5G，最高 512 GB 内存

Poco M8 Pro 5G 有 8/256 或 12/512 GB 内存可供选择。它配备 USB-C 2.0、NFC、WiFi 6E、蓝牙 5.4 和双卡双待，几乎能满足您的一切需求。但不支持 eSIM 和 microSD 卡。尽管采用的是 AMOLED 显示屏，但也不具备始终开启的显示功能；点按后显示屏只能保持 10 秒可见。

软件 - HyperOS 2.0 和 2031 年之前的更新

Poco 手机运行基于Android 15 的 HyperOS 2.0。小米计划为 Poco M8 Pro 5G 提供四次Android 更新，并在 6 年内（，直至 2031 年 1 月）提供安全更新。).

可持续性

小米公司用塑料薄膜包裹 Poco M8 Pro 5G 的包装，该包装由再生纸制成。制造商没有说明该智能手机使用了哪些回收材料。

小米提供手机自修工具和官方备件提供。如果您想处理掉您的旧设备，可以通过小米公司的以旧换新计划作为付款方式。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 6E、蓝牙 5.4 和无线电模式

在我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 上，Poco M8 Pro 5G 实现了非常稳定的传输速率，最高约为 950 Mbps。总体而言，Poco 手机的 Wi-Fi 速度高于许多竞争对手。

离线通信确实是一个独特的卖点。即使没有移动网络，两部兼容的小米智能手机也可以使用它建立语音连接。要做到这一点，必须激活蓝牙，插入 SIM 卡，每个参与者都必须登录自己的小米账户。据小米公司称，离线通信的工作距离为，最远可达 1.9 公里（约 1.2 英里）。.

Networking
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	950 (min: 929) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	852 (min: 832) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	949 (min: 940) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	950 (min: 944) MBit/s ∼69%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	951 (min: 922) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	826 (min: 709) MBit/s ∼69%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	536 (min: 421) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1191 (min: 961) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	860 (min: 440) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	752 (min: 713) MBit/s ∼63%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	373 (min: 359) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	365 (min: 359) MBit/s ∼31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	214 (min: 175) MBit/s ∼23%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	364 (min: 246) MBit/s ∼31%
Average Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	951 (min: 227) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	934 (min: 442) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1371 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1331 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	692 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	717 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1288 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1373 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼100%

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø949 (940-959)

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø949 (944-950)

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø950 (929-973)

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø845 (440-918)

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø852 (832-873)

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø750 (713-779)

Poco M8 Pro 5G 非常适合作为导航设备。它支持所有常见的卫星导航服务，除了轻微的误差外，它引导我们到达目的地的准确度不亚于参考设备 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表。

电话功能和语音质量

Poco M8 Pro 5G 支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话，可与两张实体 SIM 卡一起使用。在我们的测试通话中，这款智能手机能清晰地传输语音，并可靠地屏蔽背景噪音。

摄像头 - 5000 万像素主摄像头，配备 Light Fusion 800

Poco M8 Pro 5G 使用 5000 万像素摄像头，依靠小米的 Light Fusion 800 图像传感器。它的图像看起来清晰生动，只有仔细观察才会发现细节水平并不高。不过，即使在弱光环境下也能获得不错的效果。视频录制质量不错，最高可达 4K，每秒 30 帧。

超广角摄像头是该价位产品中的典型配置。它的分辨率只有 800 万像素，与主摄像头的质量相差甚远。不过，它能很好地控制图像噪点，整体上也能拍摄出可用的快照。

还有一个 3200 万像素的摄像头用于自拍和人像拍摄，和主摄像头一样，它的成像质量也不错。它能以每秒 30 帧的速度录制高达 1080p 的视频。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight Daylight Ultra wide angle 5x Zoom Low light

click to load images

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G

Canon EOS 90D

Honor 400

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro

click to load images

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G

Canon EOS 90D

Honor 400

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro

click to load images

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G

Canon EOS 90D

Honor 400

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro

click to load images

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G

Canon EOS 90D

Honor 400

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro

click to load images

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G

Canon EOS 90D

Honor 400

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro

ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G: 7.09 ∆E min: 2.73 - max: 11.38 ∆E

配件和保修 - 100 瓦电源需额外付费

Poco M8 Pro 5G 的配件包括一条 USB-C 数据线、一个 SIM 卡工具和一个保护套。

小米在欧盟为其 Poco 智能手机提供 12 个月的保修服务。尽管如此经销商保修和额外的保险保障，请访问Xiaomi Care。.

输入设备和操作 - 日常使用绰绰有余

骁龙 7s 骁龙 7s 第四代处理器高达 12GB 的内存和 120 Hz 的显示屏为 Poco M8 Pro 5G 带来了轻松满足日常使用的系统性能。即使在更高的图形设置下运行更复杂的应用程序和游戏，也不会给智能手机带来任何难以克服的问题。

Poco M8 Pro 5G 可使用指纹传感器或 2D 面部识别进行生物识别解锁。这两种方式在测试中都能顺利进行。

显示屏 - 3000 尼特亮度和高频 PWM 调光

AMOLED 面板略高于制造商的规格（3000 尼特），HDR 内容的亮度为 3117 cd/m²。使用 SDR 时，平均亮度为 1795 cd/m²，最高亮度为 2841 cd/m²。

峰值亮度在很短的时间内又降至 1000 cd/m² 以下。尽管如此，Poco M8 Pro 5G 的显示屏整体亮度在同类产品中名列前茅。它采用高频 PWM 调光技术，操作起来非常人性化。


1795 cd/m²	1792 cd/m²	1787 cd/m²
1791 cd/m²	1791 cd/m²	1807 cd/m²
1797 cd/m²	1790 cd/m²	1803 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1807 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1794.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.38 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1791 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.5 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
CCT: 6587 K

	Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"	Nothing Phone (3a) Pro AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8"	OnePlus Nord CE 5 AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8"	Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"	Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"
Screen		-28%	-20%	-31%	-13%	-79%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1791	1318 -26%	1315 -27%	1127 -37%	1157 -35%	1155 -36%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1795	1306 -27%	1300 -28%	1137 -37%	1151 -36%	1136 -37%
Brightness Distribution (%)	99	98 -1%	97 -2%	98 -1%	97 -2%	97 -2%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.5	1.5 -0%	1.22 19%	1.8 -20%	1.1 27%	2.42 -61%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.4	2.9 15%	2.7 21%	2.8 18%	2.4 29%	5.63 -66%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1	2.3 -130%	2 -100%	2.1 -110%	1.6 -60%	3.7 -270%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.26 ^97%	2.258 ^97%	2.11 ^104%	2.21 ^100%	2.246 ^98%
CCT	6587 ^99%	6819 ^95%	6503 ^100%	6466 ^101%	6622 ^98%	7263 ^89%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2841 cd/m²
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1953 cd/m² -31%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1877 cd/m² -34%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	1412 cd/m² -50%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1163 cd/m² -59%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3117 cd/m²
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2922 cd/m² -6%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2118 cd/m² -32%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2012 cd/m² -35%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	1347 cd/m² -57%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz
Amplitude: 14.64 %
Secondary Frequency: 3333 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8023 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

在标准色彩模式 "鲜艳"中，AMOLED 面板已经可以非常精确地再现色彩。如果您想调整图像参数，可以选择饱和和原色专业版两种额外的色彩模式，并调整色温。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.5545 ms rise
1.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.575 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.09 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.5235 ms rise
1.09 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.5645 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.5 ms).

Poco 智能手机的户外表现非常出色。其明亮且视角稳定的显示屏也能很好地补偿阳光直射，在阴暗处的可读性也完全没有问题。

性能 - 配备骁龙 7s 第 4 代处理器的 Poco M8 Pro 5G

使用骁龙 7s 第 4 代处理器作为一款中端智能手机，Poco M8 Pro 5G 的运行速度相当快。它甚至在安兔兔 v11 中突破了百万分大关。联发科 Dimensity 8350中的 OnePlus Nord CE 5的联发科 Dimensity 8350 有时会稍快一些。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=208, last 2 years)	1732 Points +41%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	1325 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (1221 - 1241, n=4)	1233 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	1227 Points
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	1179 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	1050 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	1033 Points -16%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	959 Points -22%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=208, last 2 years)	5098 Points +60%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	4201 Points +32%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	3298 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (3183 - 3311, n=4)	3241 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	3183 Points
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	2955 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	2939 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	2299 Points -28%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3269237, n=138, last 2 years)	1480764 Points +76%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	843147 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (759560 - 843147, n=2)	801354 Points -5%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	787469 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	693873 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	617456 Points -27%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	500994 Points -41%

Antutu v11 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (885038 - 3979101, n=14, last 2 years)	2610439 Points +147%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	1057813 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (1019553 - 1057813, n=2)	1038683 Points -2%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	14915 Points
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=180, last 2 years)	14820 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (13921 - 14915, n=4)	14380 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	13662 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	12811 Points -14%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	11134 Points -25%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	10617 Points -29%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 16690, n=144, last 2 years)	7697 Points +43%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	5430 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	5388 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (5076 - 5432, n=4)	5292 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	5002 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	4532 Points -16%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	3875 Points -28%
System
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 21153, n=144, last 2 years)	11493 Points +40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	10865 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	8445 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	8216 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (8102 - 8216, n=4)	8153 Points -1%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	7930 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	7621 Points -7%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 24052, n=144, last 2 years)	8773 Points +29%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	8078 Points +19%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	6795 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (5338 - 6894, n=4)	6199 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	5276 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	4953 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	4632 Points -32%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=144, last 2 years)	26056 Points +164%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (9882 - 10339, n=4)	10040 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	9883 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	8704 Points -12%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	8662 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	8011 Points -19%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	4087 Points -59%
Web
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2587, n=144, last 2 years)	1701 Points +11%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	1566 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (1526 - 1599, n=4)	1559 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	1527 Points
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	1452 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	1402 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	1367 Points -10%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=129, last 2 years)	19376 Points +125%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	8652 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	8609 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (8216 - 8756, n=3)	8527 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	8301 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	8253 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	6394 Points -26%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=110, last 2 years)	20915 Points
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	1023 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (n=1)	721 Points
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	587 Points

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	1112 Points +356%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=75, last 2 years)	709 Points +191%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	571 Points +134%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (244 - 247, n=4)	246 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	244 Points
Half Precision NPU 1.5
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	4496 Points +1735%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=75, last 2 years)	2824 Points +1053%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	1329 Points +442%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (245 - 248, n=4)	247 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	245 Points
Quantized NPU 1.5
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	4547 Points +696%
Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=75, last 2 years)	4173 Points +631%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	2645 Points +363%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (571 - 672, n=4)	606 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	571 Points

AI Benchmark - Score V6
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=81, last 2 years)	5337 Points +148%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	2154 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (2013 - 2224, n=3)	2130 Points -1%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	1373 Points -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	540 Points -75%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	299 Points -86%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	267 Points -88%

在 GPU 测试中，Poco 手机仅处于中游水平。GPU Adreno 810图形芯片的骁龙 7s 第四代显然不如 Mali-G615 MP6 GPU 的联发科 Dimensity 8350 的 Mali-G615 MP6 GPU。不过，其性能足以在中等图形设置下流畅运行当前的游戏。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2795 Points +155%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1098 Points
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	1060 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1012 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	901 Points -18%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2774 Points +151%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1107 Points
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	1055 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1010 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	907 Points -18%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9956 Points +130%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4325 Points
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	4176 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3502 Points -19%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	404 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	400 Points
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	383 Points -4%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	405 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	399 Points
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	375 Points -6%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	108 fps +7%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	101 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	90 fps -11%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	60 fps -41%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	58 fps -43%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	135 fps
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	130 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	126 fps -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	122 fps -10%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	74 fps -45%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	62 fps +5%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	59 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	59 fps
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	52 fps -12%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	88 fps +1%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	87 fps
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	85 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	76 fps -13%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	63 fps -28%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	54 fps +29%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	42 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	42 fps
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps -31%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	65 fps
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	62 fps -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	62 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps -14%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps -46%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	29 fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps +14%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps -27%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	36 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	36 fps
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	35 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -17%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps -50%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps +114%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	28 fps +27%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps +5%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps -14%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps -50%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps +133%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	20 fps -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	16 fps -24%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.9 fps -67%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69 fps +97%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	46 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps +11%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	31 fps -11%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps -46%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	118 fps +115%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	55 fps
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	52 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	44 fps -20%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps -64%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps +126%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.3 fps
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	8.8 fps -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.4 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7.1 fps -24%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.9 fps -69%

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G (Chrome 144.0.7559.109)	180.24 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (143.9 - 180.2, n=2)	162.1 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 358, n=140, last 2 years)	152.5 Points -15%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 134)	132.67 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)	131.654 Points -27%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 (Chrome 141)	122.3 Points -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	112.67 Points -37%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135)	108.784 Points -40%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=112, last 2 years)	225 runs/min +18%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G (Chrome 144.0.7559.109)	191 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (171 - 191, n=3)	182.3 runs/min -5%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 135)	170 runs/min -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	123 runs/min -36%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135)	112 runs/min -41%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)	105 runs/min -45%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=119, last 2 years)	14.2 runs/min +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (10.8 - 11.6, n=3)	11.1 runs/min +1%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G (Chrome 144.0.7559.109)	11 runs/min
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 135)	10 runs/min -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	7.49 runs/min -32%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135)	7.45 runs/min -32%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)	6.94 runs/min -37%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=136, last 2 years)	144.4 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G (Chrome 144.0.7559.109)	142 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (125 - 147, n=3)	138 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)	127 Points -11%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 134)	125 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	112 Points -21%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135)	107 Points -25%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (48731 - 49622, n=3)	49102 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G (Chrome 144.0.7559.109)	48731 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 126661, n=187, last 2 years)	48457 Points -1%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 134)	44460 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	38676 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)	38099 Points -22%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135)	36734 Points -25%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=148, last 2 years)	1175 ms * -44%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135)	1131.86 ms * -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	1072.9 ms * -32%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)	1031.23 ms * -27%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 134)	875.1 ms * -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (812 - 819, n=3)	815 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G (Chrome 144.0.7559.109)	813.6 ms *

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G	Nothing Phone (3a) Pro	OnePlus Nord CE 5	Samsung Galaxy A36 5G	Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G	Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G	Average 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		25%	21%	-32%	17%	13%	13%	86%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	1009.1	996.23 -1%	1235 22%	968.34 -4%	987.81 -2%	945 -6%	1026 ?(529 - 1860, n=13) 2%	2165 ?(270 - 4370, n=195, last 2 years) 115%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	993.91	970.63 -2%	795 -20%	166.77 -83%	943.43 -5%	837.4 -16%	936 ?(499 - 1612, n=13) -6%	1852 ?(103.2 - 4051, n=195, last 2 years) 86%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	183.57	255.89 39%	222 21%	233.98 27%	243.98 33%	184 0%	218 ?(100.2 - 337, n=13) 19%	294 ?(47.6 - 576, n=195, last 2 years) 60%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	187.74	304.95 62%	302 61%	62.58 -67%	265.26 41%	326.1 74%	255 ?(186.1 - 390, n=13) 36%	343 ?(9.4 - 987, n=195, last 2 years) 83%

Emissions - 配备立体声音效的酷炫 Poco 智能手机

温度

Poco M8 Pro 5G 即使在连续负载的情况下也不会超过温升，内部温度控制得非常好。3DMark 压力测试显示，这款智能手机几乎可以随时调用其全部 SoC 性能。

Max. Load

Idle


39.2 °C	39.4 °C	37.9 °C
38.9 °C	38.9 °C	36.2 °C
38.8 °C	38.4 °C	35.7 °C

Maximum: 39.4 °C
Average: 38.2 °C


37.4 °C	38.3 °C	37.8 °C
35.8 °C	37.2 °C	36.5 °C
35.2 °C	37 °C	36.7 °C

Maximum: 38.3 °C
Average: 36.9 °C

Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	99.5 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.4 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.1 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.6 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.6 %
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	99 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 % -1%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	97.1 % -3%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3	99 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.8 %

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø6.7 (6.69-6.71)

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.31 (6.25-6.32)

OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø18.1 (17.7-18.2)

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.42 (5.38-5.44)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø6.01 (6-6.03)

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.2 (25.1-25.3)

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø23.8 (23.7-23.8)

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø20.7 (20.6-20.8)

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.9 (25.8-26.1)

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.8 (24.7-24.9)

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø20.8 (20.7-20.9)

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø2.99 (2.97-3.01)

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.8 (2.78-2.81)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø3.01 (2.99-3.02)

发言人

除了 Dolby Atmos 外，立体声扬声器还支持 Hi-Res Audio，并能产生中高音占主导地位的良好音效。

外部音频设备可通过 USB-C 和蓝牙 5.4 连接。Poco M8 Pro 5G 支持许多最新的蓝牙编解码器。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--硅碳电池是一张王牌

能源消耗

Poco M8 Pro 5G 的运行相当节能。相比之下，它在充电时也毫不手软，因为充电功率高达 100 瓦。使用我们测试用的小米 100 瓦电源，一个完整的充电周期只需不到 50 分钟。小米手机支持最高 22.5 瓦的有线反向充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.04 / 0.17 Watt
Idle	1.11 / 1.23 / 1.34 Watt
Load	3.8 / 7.79 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G 6500 mAh	Nothing Phone (3a) Pro 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G 5110 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 6580 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		13%	-27%	2%	-14%	-103%	-26%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	1.11	0.89 20%	0.86 23%	1.14 -3%	1.2 -8%	1.178 ?(0.96 - 1.42, n=4) -6%	0.858 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=156, last 2 years) 23%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.23	1.3 -6%	1.75 -42%	1.3 -6%	1.5 -22%	4.2 ?(1.18 - 7.21, n=4) -241%	1.434 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=156, last 2 years) -17%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.34	1.33 1%	1.82 -36%	1.34 -0%	1.9 -42%	4.28 ?(1.3 - 7.24, n=4) -219%	1.614 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=156, last 2 years) -20%
Load Average * (Watt)	3.8	3.29 13%	5.31 -40%	2.96 22%	4 -5%	5.5 ?(3.79 - 8.9, n=3) -45%	6.68 ?(2.3 - 15.4, n=128, last 2 years) -76%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	7.79	4.76 39%	10.95 -41%	8.18 -5%	7.4 5%	8.08 ?(7.5 - 8.94, n=3) -4%	10.9 ?(3.53 - 22, n=128, last 2 years) -40%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.55 (1.079-7.49)

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.82 (0.773-4.77)

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.18 (1.064-10.1)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.42 (1.489-7.14)

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.947 (0.882-1.693)

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.771 (0.747-0.885)

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.221 (1.179-1.336)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.323 (1.173-1.86)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.4 (4.13-5.06)

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.91 (3.76-4.01)

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.08 (4.83-5.23)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.98 (4.04-5.46)

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.947 (0.882-1.693)

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.771 (0.747-0.885)

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.221 (1.179-1.336)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.323 (1.173-1.86)

电池寿命

Poco M8 Pro 5G 配备 6500 mAh 硅碳负极锂电池，可确保长时间运行。在适度使用的情况下，这款智能手机可以轻松地连续使用两天甚至三天才需要充电。在 Wi-Fi 测试中，Poco M8 Pro 5G 的续航时间达到了 23.5 小时，几乎超过了所有同类设备。只有小米Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G续航时间明显更长，达到 30.5 小时。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 144.0.7559.109)		23h 30min

Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G 6500 mAh	23.5 h
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro 5000 mAh	19.8 h
OnePlus Nord CE 5 5200 mAh	16.9 h
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 5000 mAh	14.8 h
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G 5110 mAh	17.4 h
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 6580 mAh	30.5 h

Notebookcheck 总体评分

小米 Poco M8 Pro 5G 凭借其强大的整体配置在众多中端智能手机中脱颖而出。显示屏亮度、电池续航时间和稳定的日常性能为其在竞争中树立了相当高的标杆。不过，该机不支持 eSIM 卡，系统中的广告也是一个负面因素。

Back to the verdict

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G - 02/14/2026 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

85%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

51 / 69 → 74%

Weight

88%

Battery

93%

Display

92%

Games Performance

19 / 55 → 34%

Application Performance

66 / 85 → 77%

AI Performance

17%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

74 / 90 → 82%

Camera

65%

Average

64%

79%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
97.4%

Repairability
50%

Software Updates
100%

Total Sustainability Score: 49.6%

可比较的替代品

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 79.1%	Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: 1. Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 2. Anoowkoa 2 Pack for Xiaomi R... 3. bemuntee Screen Protector Fo... List Price: 400 Euro	206 g	512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED
2. 79.6%	Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 12 GB Memory	Amazon: 1. JETech Screen Protector for ... 2. Ibywind For Nothing Phone (3... 3. Suttkue for Nothing Phone (3...	211 g		6.77" 2392x1080 388 PPI AMOLED
3. 80.8%	OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB	Amazon: List Price: 349€	199 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.77" 2392x1080 388 PPI AMOLED
4. 78%	Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. Samsung Galaxy A36 5G A Seri... 2. SAMSUNG Galaxy A36 5G 2025 \|... 3. Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 2025 \|... List Price: 379€	195 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI Super AMOLED
5. 76.1%	Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025 ⎘ IMG BXM-8-256 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: 1. Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco M7 P... 2. Ibywind Screen Protector For... 3. Ibywind Screen Protector For... List Price: 240€	190 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.67" 2400x1080 395 PPI AMOLED
6. 77.6%	Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: List Price: 400€	210 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!