Lenovo Yoga Tab Gen 2 评测结论
推出像 Lenovo Yoga Tab Gen2 这样高品质的紧凑型平板电脑时,容不得任何失误——来自 iPad Air、Galaxy Tab S 和 Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro 的竞争实在太激烈了。
而 Lenovo 在 2026 年也不负期待:第二代 Yoga Tab 是一款质感高端、功能丰富的平板电脑:配备用于扩展存储空间的 microSD 读卡器、高速 USB 端口、明亮且无闪烁的显示屏、疾速网络连接以及高性能 SoC。
虽然在其直接竞争对手中还有性能更强的平板电脑,但 Yoga Tab Gen 2 在续航方面确实表现出色:得益于其容量高达 11,000 mAh 的电池,这款平板电脑在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中续航超过 24 小时。然而,它的重量仅比前代产品重几克。
Lenovo 还承诺提供长期的操作系统更新,但安全更新会更早结束。此外,它也不提供支持蜂窝网络的版本,对于如此便携的平板电脑来说,这一点令人遗憾。
总体而言,Yoga Tab Gen 2 是一款品质非常高的平板电脑,足以与 Apple、Xiaomi 和 Samsung 的机型相抗衡。
Pros
Cons
价格和供货情况
Lenovo Yoga Tab Gen 2 的起售价约为 599 美元,例如可直接从制造商处购买。
至少在 Lenovo 美国官方商店购买时,手写笔和键盘包含在内。
规格参数
外壳与功能 – 采用铝制机身的 Android 平板电脑
Lenovo Yoga Tab Gen 2 重量为 480 克,是同级别中较重的平板电脑之一,但它的电池容量也是最大的。而与前代产品相比,22 克的重量差异真的能感觉出来吗?
86% 的屏占比相当出色:边框很窄,平板电脑的外观也很现代。金属机身几乎不会弯曲,也不会发出异响。按压屏幕时,只有少数位置的液晶会出现可见的形变。
它通过了 IP52 认证,这意味着这款平板电脑的防尘能力相当不错,但防水能力非常有限。
它配备了速度最高可达 5 Gbit/s 的 USB 接口,但遗憾的是,该接口无法输出视频信号,因此无法通过线缆连接显示器。不过,通过 Miracast 连接则完全没有问题。
它提供 256 GB 存储空间,使 Yoga Tab Gen 2 在对比机型中几乎恰好处于中间水平。你还可以通过 microSD 扩展存储空间,读卡器在我们的测试中速度也相当不错。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
尺寸对比
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab Gen 2 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Tablet (10.2 - 79.2, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信与操作 – Yoga Tab Gen 2 拥有极快的网速
Yoga Tab Gen 2 内置 WiFi 7,即目前最快的 Wi-Fi 标准,并充分发挥了其性能:得益于 2x2 MIMO 调制解调器,我们在接收数据时测得的单次吞吐量超过 4.6 Gbit/s,信号稳定性也非常好。
然而,无论你愿意花多少钱,Yoga Tab Gen 2 都不提供蜂窝调制解调器或卫星定位功能。
它没有指纹传感器;通过前置摄像头进行人脸识别是唯一可用的生物识别解锁方式。设置过程很快,也能可靠地识别我们。
正面配备了一颗 ToF 摄像头,可用于手势控制,甚至眼控。平板随附手写笔,还可选购键盘保护套。
| Networking | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab Gen 2 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
软件与可持续性 – 提供 6 年操作系统更新的高品质平板电脑
Yoga Tab Gen 2 预装了 Android 17。预计更新支持将持续到 2033 年初,也就是还有近 6 年。对于操作系统,Lenovo 的网站甚至承诺提供 7 次更新。
在可持续性方面,遗憾的是,Lenovo 仅为其笔记本电脑提供详细信息。至少包装基本不含塑料。
摄像头 – 配备基础摄像头的 Lenovo 平板电脑


显示屏 – 无 PWM 的 Android 平板电脑
Lenovo 采用了一块 IPS 显示屏,令人欣慰的是,我们未检测到 PWM 闪烁。像素数量非常高,因此即使是 4K 内容也能以完整分辨率呈现。
我们测得日常使用时的屏幕最高亮度约为 600 cd/m²,这使其在光线较强的日子里于户外使用时存在可读性问题。不过,在较小的显示区域以及播放 HDR 内容时,亮度可以略高,达到约 800 cd/m²。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center on Battery: 587 cd/m²
Contrast: 1545:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.34 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.896
CCT: 6322 K
| Lenovo Yoga Tab Gen 2 IPS, 3840x2560, 11.1" | Lenovo Yoga Tab LTPS, 3200x2000, 11.1" | Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9" | Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro LCD, 3200x2136, 11.2" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 OLED - Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2560x1600, 11" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -36% | 102% | |||
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 811 | 526 -35% | 1575 94% | ||
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 789 | 508 -36% | 1648 109% | ||
| Response Times | 22% | 4% | -29% | 94% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 26.1 ? | 23.2 ? 11% | 29.6 ? -13% | 33.5 ? -28% | 1.29 ? 95% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 17.6 ? | 11.9 ? 32% | 14.1 ? 20% | 22.8 ? -30% | 1.49 ? 92% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 480 | ||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 15.55 | ||||
| Screen | 8% | -9% | 12% | -5% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 587 | 609 4% | 513 -13% | 626 7% | 946 61% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.38 | 0.4 -5% | 0.45 -18% | 0.3 21% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 1545 | 1523 -1% | 1140 -26% | 2087 35% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.34 | 1.81 23% | 1.92 18% | 1.64 30% | 3.5 -50% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.13 | 2.98 28% | 4.12 -0% | 4.13 -0% | 5.5 -33% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 2.5 -0% | 2.8 -12% | 3.1 -24% | 2.4 4% |
| Gamma | 1.896 116% | 1.934 114% | 2.222 99% | 2.2 100% | 2.02 109% |
| CCT | 6322 103% | 6853 95% | 7102 92% | 6746 96% | 6322 103% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 583 | 510 | 617 | 938 | |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 91 | 98 | 96 | 96 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 15% /
12% | -14% /
-12% | -9% /
1% | 64% /
47% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7608 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.9 ms rise | |
| ↘ 7.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 26.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.4 ms rise | |
| ↘ 12.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms). | ||
性能、发热与噪音及电池续航 – 动力充沛的 Yoga Tab
Lenovo Yoga Tab Gen 2 搭载 MediaTek Dimensity 9500s,因此几乎总能提供充足的性能。虽然我们的评测机速度还不及 iPad Air 或 Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro,但在日常使用中,只有执行要求极高的任务时才能察觉到性能差异。UFS 4.0 存储的数据读写速度非常快。
机身几乎没有明显发热,但 SoC 在 3DMark 压力测试中出现了显著降频:当手机长时间处于高负载状态时,性能最低会降至 60%。
扬声器是 Yoga Tab Gen 2 的一个小短板:虽然整体表现尚可,但在高音量下声音会显得吃力,且缺乏清晰度。最大音量也不是特别高。通过蓝牙进行无线音频输出时,可使用多种编解码器。
11,000 mAh 电池带来的续航表现确实出色:与上一代相比,电池容量大幅增加,在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,续航时间延长了 6 个多小时。最终测得的续航超过 24 小时,这一成绩非常优秀,迄今只有少数其他平板电脑能够达到。
| Lenovo Yoga Tab Gen 2 | Lenovo Yoga Tab | Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 97% | 50% | -15% | 42% | 2% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 3530.2 | 3965.86 12% | 4083.3 16% | 1694.53 -52% | 3613 ? 2% | 2117 ? -40% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 1707.6 | 3363.43 97% | 3252.32 90% | 1083.12 -37% | 2625 ? 54% | 1691 ? -1% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 348.1 | 421.72 21% | 332.87 -4% | 298.38 -14% | 390 ? 12% | 280 ? -20% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 195.8 | 698.11 257% | 383.77 96% | 283.45 45% | 390 ? 99% | 327 ? 67% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab Gen 2 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab Gen 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab Gen 2 | |
| Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab Gen 2 | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Gen 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 11.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 130%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 130%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
Key:
min: | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab Gen 2 11000 mAh | Lenovo Yoga Tab 8860 mAh | Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 7606 mAh | Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro 9200 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 8400 mAh | Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 10% | -73% | -23% | -129% | 3% | -107% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.3 | 1.2 8% | 2 -54% | 1.5 -15% | 2.57 -98% | 1.363 ? -5% | 2.15 ? -65% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.6 | 1.4 13% | 2.9 -81% | 2 -25% | 4.32 -170% | 1.543 ? 4% | 3.87 ? -142% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 2 | 1.8 10% | 3.7 -85% | 2.6 -30% | 4.36 -118% | 1.777 ? 11% | 4.26 ? -113% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 7.8 | 10.9 | 6.7 | 12.54 | 6.8 ? | 8.87 ? | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 13.9 | 16.9 | 15.7 | 15.49 | 11.5 ? | 14.4 ? |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Yoga Tab Gen 2 11000 mAh | Lenovo Yoga Tab 8860 mAh | Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 7606 mAh | Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro 9200 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 8400 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -27% | -50% | -15% | -54% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 24.1 | 17.7 -27% | 12 -50% | 20.4 -15% | 11.2 -54% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 25.4 | 37.2 | |||
| Load (h) | 3.9 | 3.5 | |||
| H.264 (h) | 16.6 |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
Lenovo Yoga Tab Gen 2
- 10/08/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
可能的替代方案对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lenovo Yoga Tab Gen 2 Mediatek Dimensity 9500s ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC11 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $399.99 Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Ta... 2. $619.99 Lenovo Yoga Tab AI Tablet, 1... 3. $424.99 Lenovo Tab Plus Gen 2 - Ente... List Price: 649€ | 480 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 11.10" 3840x2560 416 PPI IPS | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $619.99 Lenovo Yoga Tab AI Tablet, 1... 2. $399.99 Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Ta... 3. $649.99 Lenovo Yoga Tab AI Tablet, 1... List Price: 499€ | 458 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 11.10" 3200x2000 340 PPI LTPS | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 Apple M4 8-Core ⎘ Apple M4 9-Core GPU ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe | List Price: 600€ | 464 g | 128 GB NVMe | 10.86" 2360x1640 265 PPI IPS | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $639.00 XIAOMI Pad 8 Pro Ai WiFi Ver... 2. $519.50 XIAOMI Pad 8 Pro Ai WiFi Ver... 3. $632.50 XIAOMI Pad 8 Pro Ai WiFi Ver... List Price: 600€ | 485 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 11.20" 3200x2136 344 PPI LCD | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 899€ | 469 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 11.00" 2560x1600 274 PPI OLED - Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

































