结论 - 联想 Yoga Tab
如果您正在为学校或大学寻找一款物超所值的平板电脑,那么联想 Yoga Tab 绝对是您的不二之选。其价格合理的配件和出色的联想 Tab Pen Pro(包装盒中附带)使其成为在讲座或课堂上使用的最佳选择。
与三星Galaxy Tab S11 和Apple iPad Air 等高端竞争对手相比,联想平板电脑最大的弱点可能是缺乏更新支持。不过,如果直接与联想的中端平板电脑相比,Apple ,尽管价格高出很多,但在显示屏和电池续航时间等关键功能方面还是暴露出了自己的不足。
虽然 Yoga Tab 不得不在处理器和功能方面做出一些妥协(无跟踪功能、无指纹传感器等),但作为一款中端平板电脑,其性能仍然非常出色。缺乏内存扩展和安全的生物识别解锁方法则令人有些失望。
Pros
Cons
价格和供货情况 - 联想 Yoga Tab
联想 Yoga Tab 有 12 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间,起价 549 美元。除此之外,制造商还提供各种捆绑销售。不过,在撰写本评论时,其他在线商店的供货情况有限。
Table of Contents
- 结论 - 联想 Yoga Tab
- 规格 - 联想 Yoga Tab
- 外壳 -Android 平板电脑采用铝质表面处理
- 功能 - 配备高速 USB 端口的中端平板电脑
- 软件 - 联想 Yoga Tab 随附Android 15
- 通信与全球导航卫星系统 -Android 平板电脑缺乏 5G 功能
- 摄像头 - 联想 Yoga Tab 配备了微距镜头
- 配件和保修 - 配备触控笔的中端平板电脑
- 输入设备和操作 - 没有指纹传感器的Android 平板电脑
- 显示屏 - 联想决定不使用 OLED 显示屏
- 性能 - 配备高通 SoC 的Android 平板电脑
- 排放 - 联想 Yoga Tab 采用杜比全景声技术
- 电池续航时间 -Android 配备硅碳电池的平板电脑
- Notebookcheck 总体评分
- 可能的替代品比较
尽管新款 Yoga Tab 的价格处于中端水平,但其竞争对手包括 Galaxy Tab S11和 iPad Air 11.由于配备了联想 Tab Pen Pro、快速的高通 骁龙8代3处理器和著名的人工智能工具,联想平板电脑是中小学生的理想选择。
规格 - 联想 Yoga Tab
外壳 -Android 平板电脑采用铝质表面处理
Yoga Tab 制作精良,质感上乘。铝制外壳坚固而轻巧,重量仅为 458 克。不过,联想平板电脑的厚度为 6.2 毫米,感觉比 Galaxy 平板电脑 S11.此外,这款中端平板电脑仅通过了 IP53 防护认证,可以防尘防溅水。
Yoga Tab 的屏占比超过 84%,考虑到其价格区间,其正面是节省空间设计的典范。LTPS 面板由大猩猩 7i 玻璃保护,防止划伤。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
功能 - 配备高速 USB 端口的中端平板电脑
Yoga Tab 配备了蓝牙 5.4 和 USB-C 3.0 端口,不仅能实现快速数据传输和图像输出,还支持 OTG(On-The-Go),用于连接外部设备。Pogo 针接口可用于连接选配的键盘保护套。
联想平板电脑缺少内存扩展选项以及 3.5 毫米音频插孔。
软件 - 联想 Yoga Tab 随附Android 15
测试期间,Yoga Tab 仍在运行基于 2025 年 7 月补丁的Android 15。尽管联想平板电脑已被列入 EPREL 数据库虽然联想平板电脑在 EPREL 数据库中被列为 7 年更新一次,但制造商只承诺了三次主要的操作系统更新和四年的安全补丁。
公司自有应用程序中的人工智能功能可与 ZUI 17 界面配合使用。其中包括 "AI Note "应用、"AI 续写 "和 "AI 重写 "功能,以及谷歌的 Circle to Search。
可持续性
EPREL 数据库指数证实了这款中端平板电脑出色的可修复性,并给予其最高的 A 级评价。虽然 Yoga Tab 的包装不使用塑料,但没有关于其碳足迹或所用材料的其他信息。
通信与全球导航卫星系统 -Android 平板电脑缺乏 5G 功能
Yoga Tab 支持现代 Wi-Fi 7 标准,包括 6 GHz 频段。这有助于在我们的测量中实现快速稳定的 Wi-Fi 连接。当与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器配对时,联想平板电脑的传输速度高达 1,600 Mbps 以上。
这款中端平板电脑配备了双麦克风,可用于语音录制。不过,联想没有提供 5G 版本,这意味着既不能使用手机通话,也不能使用移动互联网。此外,该平板电脑没有安装 GPS 模块,这意味着定位功能仅限于 Wi-Fi 数据。
Networking | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
OnePlus Pad 3 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average of class Tablet | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
摄像头 - 联想 Yoga Tab 配备了微距镜头


配件和保修 - 配备触控笔的中端平板电脑
Yoga Tab 随附 Tab Pen Pro 和 USB 2.0 充电线缆。可选的集成触控板的键盘盖和对开式保护套可以以非常合理的价格单独购买(建议零售价 25 美元起)。不过,这款中端平板电脑也有多种捆绑产品可供选择,包括保护套和/或电源适配器。
联想提供多种 保修条款的保修条款。通常情况下,保修期为 24 个月,可选择 "带入 "或快递服务。不过,根据数据表,也有一年或三年的保修套餐可供选择。
输入设备和操作 - 没有指纹传感器的Android 平板电脑
显示屏 - 联想决定不使用 OLED 显示屏
11.1 英寸 16:10 LTPS 面板分辨率为 2,000p ,像素密度高达 340 PPI。与之相比 Apple iPad Pro每英寸只有 264 像素。联想还宣传 Yoga Tab 的屏幕通过了德国莱茵 TÜV 认证(无闪烁、低蓝光、Full Care Display 3.0)。
根据制造商的说法,它的亮度可以达到 600 尼特,在显示 HDR 内容时甚至可以达到 800 尼特。APL18 图案(743 cd/m²)和白色背景(609 cd/m²)的亮度值非常接近。联想没有使用 PWM 闪烁来控制显示屏亮度。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 609 cd/m²
Contrast: 1523:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.81 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.8}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.934
CCT: 6853 K
Lenovo Yoga Tab LTPS, 3200x2000, 11.1" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 OLED - Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2560x1600, 11" | Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro IPS, 3200x2136, 11.2" | Apple iPad Air 11 2025 IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9" | OnePlus Pad 3 IPS, 3392x2400, 13.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -9% | -5% | -0% | -6% | |
Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 609 | 946 55% | 776 27% | 508 -17% | 687 13% |
Brightness (cd/m²) | 583 | 938 61% | 750 29% | 497 -15% | 641 10% |
Brightness Distribution (%) | 91 | 96 5% | 91 0% | 93 2% | 88 -3% |
Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.4 | 0.58 -45% | 0.5 -25% | 0.58 -45% | |
Contrast (:1) | 1523 | 1338 -12% | 1016 -33% | 1184 -22% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.81 | 3.5 -93% | 1.6 12% | 1.13 38% | 2.03 -12% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.98 | 5.5 -85% | 4.5 -51% | 2.49 16% | 3.38 -13% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 2.4 4% | 2.5 -0% | 1.7 32% | 1.8 28% |
Gamma | 1.934 114% | 2.02 109% | 2.23 99% | 2.173 101% | 2.159 102% |
CCT | 6853 95% | 6322 103% | 6892 94% | 6747 96% | 6727 97% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8215 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
11.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.7 ms rise | |
↘ 3.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise | |
↘ 6.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms). |
性能 - 配备高通 SoC 的Android 平板电脑
配备 骁龙 8 代 3Yoga Tab 并没有安装当前的旗舰 SoC,而是使用了快速芯片组。虽然这款中端平板电脑在主页上总是标明拥有 12GB 内存,但我们的评测样品只能使用 8GB 内存。
作为一款中端平板电脑,它的性能还算不错。不过,在 Geekbench 6 的基准测试中,联想平板电脑与高端竞争对手展开了激烈的竞争,并在很大程度上输给了 OnePlus Pad 3.
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (11487 - 18370, n=22) | |
Average of class Tablet (2597 - 76843, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro |
AImark - Score v3.x | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (963 - 245629, n=19) | |
Average of class Tablet (138 - 55794, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 |
高通公司 SoC 的 Adreno 750在要求苛刻的 GFXBench 4K 测试中取得了超过 30fps 的成绩。这比 小米 Pad 7 Pro.
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
OnePlus Pad 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
OnePlus Pad 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
OnePlus Pad 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro |
3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
OnePlus Pad 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro |
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
OnePlus Pad 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
OnePlus Pad 3 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
OnePlus Pad 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
OnePlus Pad 3 | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
OnePlus Pad 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
OnePlus Pad 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro |
Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140) | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (245 - 263, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab (Chrome 140) | |
Average of class Tablet (61.3 - 456, n=27, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab (Chrome 140) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69 - 212, n=22) | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Average of class Tablet (26 - 315, n=75, last 2 years) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab (Chrome 140) | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132) | |
OnePlus Pad 3 (Chrome 139) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 75238, n=27) | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=103, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 27101, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (510 - 2066, n=25) | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab (Chrome 140) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140) | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18) |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Yoga Tab | Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | OnePlus Pad 3 | Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -53% | -21% | -19% | -21% | -59% | |
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 3965.86 | 1694.53 -57% | 3849.52 -3% | 3796 -4% | 3658 ? -8% | 1562 ? -61% |
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 3363.43 | 1083.12 -68% | 3283.91 -2% | 3329 -1% | 2703 ? -20% | 1154 ? -66% |
Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 421.72 | 298.38 -29% | 302.34 -28% | 316 -25% | 379 ? -10% | 228 ? -46% |
Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 698.11 | 283.45 -59% | 346.85 -50% | 368 -47% | 393 ? -44% | 257 ? -63% |
排放 - 联想 Yoga Tab 采用杜比全景声技术
温度
在日常使用中,Yoga Tab 的外壳几乎不会发热,即使在负载情况下,我们测得的温度上升也在可控范围内。为了检查内部散热情况,我们使用了 3DMark 的压力测试。在这方面,联想平板电脑表现出了相当高的稳定性,而 骁龙芯片只出现了轻微的节流现象。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark 压力测试
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
OnePlus Pad 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
OnePlus Pad 3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
OnePlus Pad 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
OnePlus Pad 3 | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 |
发言人
Yoga Tab 的四个扬声器可提供支持杜比全景声(Dolby Atmos)的立体声音效。音效不错,但音质并不特别突出,联想平板电脑缺乏深度。中频和高频的再现可以更加线性。
音频输出可通过蓝牙 5.4 无线传输,也可通过 USB 端口有线传输。除 SBC 和 AAC 外,Yoga Tab 还支持 aptX、aptX HD、Opus、LC3 和 LDAC。
Lenovo Yoga Tab audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 -Android 配备硅碳电池的平板电脑
耗电量
对于一款 11.1 英寸的液晶平板电脑来说,空闲功耗是非常高效的,电池的标称容量为 8,860 毫安时,容量之大令人期待。硅碳锂离子电池的最大充电功率为 45 瓦。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo Yoga Tab 8860 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 8400 mAh | Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro 8850 mAh | Apple iPad Air 11 2025 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -107% | 4% | -72% | -2% | -74% | |
Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.2 | 2.57 -114% | 0.75 37% | 1.6 -33% | 0.969 ? 19% | 1.998 ? -67% |
Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.4 | 4.32 -209% | 1.5 -7% | 2.8 -100% | 1.721 ? -23% | 3.78 ? -170% |
Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 1.8 | 4.36 -142% | 1.56 13% | 4.7 -161% | 1.891 ? -5% | 4.13 ? -129% |
Load Average * (Watt) | 7.8 | 12.54 -61% | 7.92 -2% | 11.4 -46% | 8.91 ? -14% | 8.93 ? -14% |
Load Maximum * (Watt) | 13.9 | 15.49 -11% | 16.5 -19% | 16.8 -21% | 12.1 ? 13% | 12.8 ? 8% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗:Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
功耗:GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
这款平板电脑良好的能源管理也体现在它的电池续航时间上。在调整显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m² 的 Wi-Fi 测试中,Yoga Tab 的续航时间超过 1,000 分钟,比 iPad Air 11 多出 7 个小时。 iPad Air 11.
Lenovo Yoga Tab 8860 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 8400 mAh | Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro 8850 mAh | Apple iPad Air 11 2025 mAh | OnePlus Pad 3 12140 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery runtime | |||||
WiFi v1.3 (h) | 17.7 | 11.2 -37% | 17.6 -1% | 11.7 -34% | 23.9 35% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分

就性价比而言,联想 Yoga Tab 是三星Galaxy Tab S11 或Apple iPad Air 11 的一个非常令人兴奋的替代品。在许多方面,这款经济实惠的联想平板电脑几乎不逊色于价格昂贵得多的高端竞争对手。
Lenovo Yoga Tab
- 10/05/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lenovo Yoga Tab Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $599.00 Lenovo - Yoga Tab Plus - 12.... 2. $359.99 Lenovo Idea Tab Pro with Goo... 3. $14.95 ProCase 2 Pack Screen Protec... List Price: 499€ | 458 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 11.10" 3200x2000 340 PPI LTPS | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 128 GB | Amazon: 1. $859.99 Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 256 G... 2. $1,199.99 Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra... 3. $569.99 SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10 FE 25... List Price: 899€ | 469 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 11.00" 2560x1600 274 PPI OLED - Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $587.50 Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Ver... 2. $389.00 Xiaomi Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version... 3. $9.99 Fhyeugfy [2 Pack ] Screen Pr... List Price: 450€ | 500 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 11.20" 3200x2136 344 PPI IPS | |
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 Apple M3 ⎘ Apple M3 9-Core GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe | Amazon: $537.00 List Price: 699€ | 460 g | 128 GB NVMe | 10.86" 2360x1640 265 PPI IPS | |
OnePlus Pad 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: $609.96 List Price: 699€ | 675 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 13.20" 3392x2400 315 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.