小米 Pad 8 Pro 评测：物美价廉的骁龙 8 精英平板电脑

Name: Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Brand: Xiaomi

500 欧元买了很多平板电脑。

小米新推出的 Pad 8 Pro 高端平板电脑再次成为性价比王座的竞争者。与Apple iPad Air 或Galaxy Tab S11 相比，Pad 8 Pro 尽管提供了最好的硬件，却显得相当实惠。我们将在评测中了解搭载 HyperOS 3 的小米 Pad 8 Pro 的性能如何。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 11/24/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Tablet Wi-Fi 7 Touchscreen

对小米 Pad 8 Pro 的评价

与前代产品一样，小米 Pad 8 Pro 也具有极高的性价比，尤其适合正在寻找一款功能强大、支持手写笔的Android 平板电脑的用户。

Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC 无可挑剔，与 HyperOS 3 界面和 144 Hz 面板相结合，功能极其强大。就原始性能而言，即使是三星Galaxy Tab S11 这样的高端平板电脑也望尘莫及。

虽然 Pad 8 Pro 的 11.2 英寸 3:2 显示屏只是 LCD 而非 OLED，但由于其分辨率高、对比度非常好，而且峰值亮度也很吸引人，因此几乎没有什么可批评的。

特别是无 PWM 显示屏确保了无闪烁的舒适观看体验--这对敏感用户来说是一个很大的加分点，因为 Pad 8 Pro 的屏幕比价格更贵的Apple iPad Air 11 还要高出一个档次。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Test device courtesy of tradingshenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

小米平板电脑在全球范围内的可用性仍然是个问号，因此必须接受中国版 HyperOS 3 在更新政策、系统语言等方面的某些限制。

Pros

+ 明亮的 144 Hz 面板

+ 运行时间长

+ 快速 SoC

+ 高品质金属一体成型机身

+ USB 3.2 端口

Cons

- (目前）仅提供进口版本

- 无 5G 选项

- 无 GPS

小米 Pad 8 Pro 的价格和上市时间

小米 Pad 8 Pro 基础版售价 2799 日元（约合 335 欧元或 394 美元）。进口版的起价约为 500 欧元。有关在国际市场上市的详细信息尚未公布。

与小米 Pad 7 Pro 类似，当前 Pro 机型的全球上市可能只是时间问题。2026 年春季的 MWC 是一个可能的日期。

$329.99

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Version 12.1 Octa Core Global Rom 10000 mAh Bluetooth 5.3 8Mp Dual Camera (Graphite Gray, 256Gb + 8Gb)

$539.50
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Version Global (No Calls or Text) 11.2 inches 3.2K 144Hz 8850mAh Bluetooth 5.4 Four Speakers 50 Mp Cam Model 24091RPADG (Gray, 512GB + 12GB)
$311.42
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Version (No calls or Text) 12.1 Octa Core Global Rom 10000mAh Bluetooth 5.3 8Mp Dual Camera (Ocean Blue, 256Gb + 8Gb)

对小米 Pad 8 Pro 的评价
小米 Pad 8 Pro 的规格
结构：Android 平板电脑，铝合金一体成型机身
功能特点Pad 8 Pro 配备快速 USB 3.2
软件：Pad 8 Pro 上的全新 HyperOS 3
通信与全球导航卫星系统：Android 平板电脑，配备 Wi-Fi 7，但无 5G 功能
摄像头：Pad 8 Pro 支持 HDR 和 4K60 摄录
配件和保修：小米 Pad 8 Pro 随附电源适配器
输入设备和操作：11 英寸平板电脑，带指纹传感器
显示屏：Pad 8 Pro 依靠液晶显示屏
性能：Pad 8 Pro 的骁龙 8 精英版给人留下深刻印象
游戏一款适合游戏玩家的有趣平板电脑
排放：功能强大的平板电脑，几乎没有节流
能量管理：Pad 8 Pro 提供续航能力
Notebookcheck 对小米 Pad 8 Pro 的总体印象
潜在替代品比较

小米推出了备受瞩目的全新迭代产品 Pad 7 Pro上市。新款 Pad 8 Pro 的主要特点是升级了骁龙 8 Elite SoC和稍大的电池容量。

除此之外，Pad 8 Pro 的改进基本上是渐进式的。在这篇评测中，我们将探讨小米在哪些方面进行了改进，以及它在竞争中的表现如何。

小米 Pad 8 Pro 的规格

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 840

Memory

16 GB

Display

11.20 inch 3:2, 3200 x 2136 pixel 344 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, native pen support, LCD, touch rate up to 1080Hz, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB

, 462 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 5.8 x 251.2 x 173.4

Battery

9200 mAh

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 4K@30/60fps)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.2, 19 mm, 1/3.6")

Additional features

Speakers: 4 speakers, charger, USB cable, info material, HyperOS 3, 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

485 g, Power Supply: 107 g

Price

600 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

结构：Android 平板电脑，铝合金一体成型机身

Pad 8 Pro 采用纤薄的金属外壳，高度仅为 5.8 毫米。铝合金一体成型的磨砂表面确保几乎看不到指纹。Pad 8 Pro 的重量为 485 克，比上一代产品轻 15 克。

虽然中国版没有官方 IP 认证，但这一信息通常只有全球小米平板电脑才知道。我们推测，Pad 7 Pro 的继任者将再次获得 IP52 等级认证。

我们认为整体设计非常成功，Pad 8 Pro 看起来很像 Apple iPad Pro视觉效果。

显示屏给人留下了深刻印象，屏占比超过 86%，边缘相当窄，外观非常吸引人。不过，目前还不清楚中国版采用的是哪种保护玻璃。小米可能会像 Pad 7 Pro 一样使用大猩猩 3 号玻璃。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Yoga Tab Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Apple iPad Air 11 2025 DIN A5 ❌

功能特点Pad 8 Pro 配备快速 USB 3.2

虽然 Pad 8 Pro 的基本配置仅提供 LPDDR5X 和 UFS 3.1 作为标准，但与前代产品相比，其升级之处在于配备了速度更快的 LPDDR5T 内存和 UFS 4.1 存储系统。

USB Type-C 端口符合 USB 3.2 标准，可以 5 Gbit/s 的速度快速传输数据。在适配器的帮助下，USB 端口还可用作外接屏幕显示信号的输出口。

其他功能还包括红外接口、手写笔支持、Miracast 和 USB OTG。此外，还提供用于跨设备使用 HyperOS 设备的小米 HyperConnect 服务和工作站模式。

MacOS 和 iPad OS 的显示内容也可以镜像到 Pad 8 Pro 上。

软件：Pad 8 Pro 上的全新 HyperOS 3

Pad 8 Pro 搭载了公司自己的 HyperOS 3，它基于最新的Android 16。这为小米平板电脑带来了更灵活的窗口管理和全新的动画效果。根据制造商的说法，HyperOS 3 可以将应用程序的响应速度提高 21%，游戏时的功耗降低 9%。

我们的中文版只支持英文语言包，不支持 PlayStore。后者可以稍后安装，而德语系统语言则需要等待全球版本。这也适用于官方更新承诺。

启动程序解锁需要使用中文 ROM，因为解锁启动程序HyperOS 下的启动加载器解锁在中国以外的地区难以实现。

在软件更新方面，小米不愿意在中文网站上提供信息。在测试时，Pad 8 Pro 运行的是从 2025 年 10 月开始的最新安全补丁。

使用中文 ROM 的进口设备有望获得三到四年的安全补丁。

可持续性

小米平板电脑采用无塑料外包装。部分配件采用纸膜覆盖。该公司没有提供任何有关可修复性和二氧化碳排放量的信息，也没有说明是否使用了可回收材料以及使用了多少可回收材料。

通信与全球导航卫星系统：Android 平板电脑，配备 Wi-Fi 7，但无 5G 功能

Pad 8 Pro 配备了包括 MU-MIMO 支持在内的快速 Wi-Fi 7，在我们的测量中传输速度很快。不过，在 6 GHz 6E 频段收发时，小米平板电脑仍有一定的提升空间。

虽然我们测得与华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000路由器配合使用时的峰值传输速率超过1600 Mbps，但Pad 8 Pro在无线传输的一致性方面仍有不足。

Pad 8 Pro 不提供使用移动数据的选项，也不支持通过卫星系统定位。

Networking
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	719 (min: 546) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	922 (min: 807) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1148 (min: 966) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1338 (min: 1008) MBit/s ∼71%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	988 (min: 806) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1689 (min: 1523) MBit/s ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	970 (min: 946) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	981 (min: 963) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1827 (min: 1785) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1874 (min: 1677) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1011 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1484 (min: 1233) MBit/s ∼79%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	991 (min: 512) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	895 (min: 751) MBit/s ∼82%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	937 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1088 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1264 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1441 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼77%
Average of class Tablet
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	585 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	657 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1251 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1464 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼78%

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1148 (966-1382)

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1338 (1008-1668)

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø719 (546-934)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø974 (512-1016)

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø922 (807-1190)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø891 (751-988)

摄像头：Pad 8 Pro 支持 HDR 和 4K60 摄录

在摄像头方面，Pad 8 Pro 与前代产品相比没有变化。前置 3200 万像素超广角镜头，f/2.2 光圈，固定焦距。照片清晰度不错，曝光也令人满意。

Pad 8 Pro 的 5000 万像素主摄像头具有更高的分辨率和相位检测自动对焦功能。所采用的三星 JN1 传感器可确保在光线条件良好的情况下拍摄出稳定的动态范围和细节丰富的照片。作为一款平板电脑，在色彩保真度方面也没有什么值得批评的地方。

如果你想用平板电脑拍摄文档或演示文稿，小米 Pad 是一个非常不错的选择。不过，5000 万像素的主摄像头在放大时很快就会达到极限，放大 3 倍以上就会出现明显的质量下降。

视频最多只能以 60 帧/秒的速度录制 4K 超高清视频。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件和保修：小米 Pad 8 Pro 随附电源适配器

Pad 8 Pro 随附一个 67 W 快速充电电源适配器和一条数据线或充电线（USB Type-A 转 Type-C）。我们在深圳的借机交易在中国版的供货范围内增加了一个用于充电器的欧盟适配器。

小米还为 Pad 8 Pro 提供了Apple Magic Keyboard 样式的时尚键盘盖和 Focus Pen Pro 触控笔。

我们的进口设备有保修保修期为 12 个月。如果需要保修，Trading Shenzhen 可以选择将平板电脑寄往德国的收货地址。

输入设备和操作：11 英寸平板电脑，带指纹传感器

Pad 8 Pro 的 11.2 英寸液晶显示屏具有精确的输入和高达 1,080 Hz 的高采样率，给人留下深刻印象。这意味着触摸屏每秒刷新多达 1,080 次以检索输入。HyperOS 3 用户界面的动画也受益于 144 Hz 的高刷新率。

新推出的 Focus Pen Pro 仅重 18 克，可用于手写笔记，据说可实现超过 16,000 级压力的精细输入。据说延迟时间也只有 1 毫秒。与 Focus Pen 相比，Pro 型号完全取消了实体按键。

平板电脑左侧开/关按钮上的指纹传感器可以解锁屏幕。用食指即可轻松触及，而且工作可靠、快速。

另外，Pad 8 Pro 还通过前置摄像头提供安全性较低的 2D 面部识别功能。

显示屏：Pad 8 Pro 依靠液晶显示屏

Pad 8 Pro 的 11.2 英寸 144 Hz 液晶面板采用 3:2 格式，分辨率为 3,200 x 2,136 像素，像素密度高达 445 ppi。相比之下 iPad Air 11只能达到 265 ppi。

在亮度方面，小米平板电脑也是另辟蹊径。APL18 测量的峰值亮度为 778 cd/m²。此外，还获得了德国莱茵 TÜV 的三重认证。

由于采用了液晶显示技术，即使在低亮度下，我们也无法检测到任何闪烁现象，因此 Pad 8 Pro 适合对 PMW 敏感的用户使用。


625 cd/m²	623 cd/m²	619 cd/m²
603 cd/m²	626 cd/m²	614 cd/m²
608 cd/m²	611 cd/m²	622 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 626 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 616.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 626 cd/m²
Contrast: 2087:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.64 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
CCT: 6746 K

	Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro LCD, 3200x2136, 11.2"	Lenovo Yoga Tab LTPS, 3200x2000, 11.1"	Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 OLED - Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2560x1600, 11"	Apple iPad Air 11 2025 IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"	Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro IPS, 3200x2136, 11.2"
Screen		-5%	-3%	-5%	-10%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	626	609 -3%	946 51%	508 -19%	776 24%
Brightness (cd/m²)	617	583 -6%	938 52%	497 -19%	750 22%
Brightness Distribution (%)	96	91 -5%	96 0%	93 -3%	91 -5%
Black Level * (cd/m²)	0.3	0.4 -33%		0.5 -67%	0.58 -93%
Contrast (:1)	2087	1523 -27%		1016 -51%	1338 -36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.64	1.81 -10%	3.5 -113%	1.13 31%	1.6 2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.13	2.98 28%	5.5 -33%	2.49 40%	4.5 -9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.1	2.5 19%	2.4 23%	1.7 45%	2.5 19%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	1.934 ^114%	2.02 ^109%	2.173 ^101%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6746 ^96%	6853 ^95%	6322 ^103%	6747 ^96%	6892 ^94%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8149 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在 "Original Pro "色彩配置文件中，个别色彩和灰度级的差异几乎看不出来。

我们使用 X-rite i1Basic Pro 3 进行的测量显示，黑阶值较低，为 0.3 cd/m²。液晶屏的对比度也非常好，约为 2,000:1。

ColorChecker （配置文件：Original Pro，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11.6 ms rise
22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17.8 ms rise
33.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15.7 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

Pad 8 Pro 的室外可读性也给人留下了深刻印象，这要归功于它不错的亮度。

如果你想避免恼人的反光，可以选择采用纳米柔光显示技术的液晶显示屏，这种技术本质上是一种哑光涂层。我们的测试样品采用了高亮度屏幕，玻璃表面的反光清晰可见。

平视时，显示屏色彩逼真。在日常使用中，液晶显示屏在全黑状态下的轻微混浊并不令人讨厌。

性能：Pad 8 Pro 的骁龙 8 精英版给人留下深刻印象

骁龙 8 骁龙 8 精英SoC 使 Pad 8 Pro 成为目前速度最快的中端Android 平板电脑之一。在 Geekbench 基准测试中，小米平板电脑取得了非常好的成绩，轻松击败了 Galaxy 平板电脑S11的联发科 Dimensity 9400+.

Geekbench AI 的成绩对于搭载 Snapdragon 8 Elite 的平板电脑来说也非常不错。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384	3088 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (2309 - 3228, n=28)	3048 Points -1%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192	3019 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	2478 Points -20%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1999 Points -35%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	1973 Points -36%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 4128, n=99, last 2 years)	1482 Points -52%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192	11773 Points +23%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384	9543 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (7656 - 10401, n=28)	9175 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	7787 Points -18%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	6689 Points -30%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	5127 Points -46%
Average of class Tablet (848 - 16544, n=99, last 2 years)	4744 Points -50%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384	2870924 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (2090799 - 3015111, n=20)	2660168 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	2396591 Points -17%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192	2045290 Points -29%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1930622 Points -33%
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 3475590, n=72, last 2 years)	1199761 Points -58%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	Points -100%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Lenovo Yoga Tab Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	24387 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (14366 - 27428, n=23)	20566 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	15743 Points
Average of class Tablet (4622 - 27428, n=80, last 2 years)	12511 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	Points

CrossMark - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (1064 - 2674, n=18)	1887 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	1123 Points
Average of class Tablet (227 - 2155, n=57, last 2 years)	978 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	Points

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	12637 Points +12%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384	11326 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (8155 - 14066, n=19)	11251 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	10364 Points -8%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	8895 Points -21%
Average of class Tablet (195 - 13159, n=66, last 2 years)	6018 Points -47%
System
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384	17526 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	16271 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (10849 - 20776, n=19)	15801 Points -10%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	12034 Points -31%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	9937 Points -43%
Average of class Tablet (904 - 18343, n=66, last 2 years)	9286 Points -47%
Memory
Lenovo Yoga Tab Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	14321 Points +3%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384	13893 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	13578 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (7081 - 20572, n=19)	13523 Points -3%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	12938 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet (401 - 17963, n=66, last 2 years)	7070 Points -49%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (35063 - 384996, n=19)	59181 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	55053 Points +50%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384	36723 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	33533 Points -9%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	24738 Points -33%
Average of class Tablet (88 - 57192, n=66, last 2 years)	16342 Points -55%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	2152 Points +18%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	2009 Points +10%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	1928 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (1202 - 2370, n=19)	1908 Points +5%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384	1823 Points
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2370, n=66, last 2 years)	1525 Points -16%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	76843 Points +295%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384	19438 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	17623 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (8865 - 22767, n=17)	17519 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet (2597 - 76852, n=65, last 2 years)	16931 Points -13%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	14738 Points -24%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (787 - 307528, n=16)	20815 Points +947%
Average of class Tablet (138 - 55794, n=55, last 2 years)	5939 Points +199%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384	1988 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1463 Points -26%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	1192 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	Points -100%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	1143 Points +95%
Average of class Tablet (166 - 5295, n=27, last 2 years)	704 Points +20%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384	587 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (246 - 676, n=9)	499 Points -15%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	489 Points -17%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	9067 Points +1426%
Average of class Tablet (154 - 41155, n=27, last 2 years)	3526 Points +494%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384	594 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (249 - 669, n=9)	502 Points -15%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	481 Points -19%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	12422 Points +848%
Average of class Tablet (88 - 57388, n=27, last 2 years)	5050 Points +285%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384	1311 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1127 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (508 - 1576, n=9)	1083 Points -17%

AI Benchmark - Score V6
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384	17293 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	12632 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (302 - 17293, n=15)	9205 Points -47%
Average of class Tablet (70.4 - 17293, n=27, last 2 years)	3894 Points -77%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	3686 Points -79%

凭借骁龙 8 精英版的集成图形处理器，Pad 8 Pro 的定位也非常明确。与配备了骁龙 8s Gen 3相比，GPU 性能的提升尤为显著。

在 GFXBench 4K 测试中，Pad 8 Pro 的 Adreno 840在 GFXBench 4K 测试中，尽管显示屏分辨率较高，但 Adreno 840 仍取得了 43 帧/秒的优异成绩。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6432 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6388 Points -1%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	5611 Points -13%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5028 Points -22%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3283 Points -49%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6405 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6353 Points -1%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	5190 Points -19%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5043 Points -21%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3201 Points -50%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	26009 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23674 Points -9%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	19029 Points -27%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12074 Points -54%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	11683 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11564 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8562 Points -27%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	5675 Points -51%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5212 Points -55%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	11589 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11543 Points 0%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	8906 Points -23%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8601 Points -26%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5182 Points -55%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2596 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2491 Points -4%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	2088 Points -20%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1693 Points -35%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1075 Points -59%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2643 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2577 Points -2%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	2572 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1672 Points -37%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1098 Points -58%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	788 fps +1%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	778 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	592 fps -24%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	478 fps -39%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	449 fps -42%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +1%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +1%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	119 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	109 fps -8%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	511 fps +3%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	498 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	450 fps -10%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	332 fps -33%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	267 fps -46%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +17%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	103 fps
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	99 fps -4%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps -42%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58 fps -44%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	359 fps +11%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	323 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	238 fps -26%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	234 fps -28%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	183 fps -43%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	103 fps +45%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	71 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps -15%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -15%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	35 fps -51%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	199 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	177 fps -11%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	159 fps -20%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	141 fps -29%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	109 fps -45%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	88 fps +66%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps +13%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	55 fps +4%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	53 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	30 fps -43%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	95 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps -5%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	77 fps -19%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	64.2 fps -32%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53 fps -44%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	118 fps +49%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81 fps +3%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	79 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps -24%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	46 fps -42%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	255 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	233 fps -9%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	208 fps -18%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	188 fps -26%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	145 fps -43%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	43 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps -7%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	35.2 fps -18%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	33 fps -23%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	24 fps -44%

Pad 8 Pro 在 Chrome 浏览器中的运行速度非常好，但在浏览器基准测试中的成绩参差不齐。

在日常使用中，网站打开速度很快，滚动浏览也很流畅。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2
2.0 Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (75.1 - 329, n=17)	223 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)	195.343 Points
Average of class Tablet (22.3 - 395, n=69, last 2 years)	150.2 Points
2.2 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140)	309.456 Points +16%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)	303.591 Points +13%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro (Chrome 141)	267.483 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab (Chrome 140)	249.389 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (113.6 - 307, n=7)	242 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet (61.3 - 579, n=31, last 2 years)	213 Points -20%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)	34.4 runs/min +18%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro (Chrome 141)	29.2 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (15.3 - 36.8, n=16)	24.6 runs/min -16%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 49.1, n=63, last 2 years)	14.4 runs/min -51%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)	12.3 runs/min -58%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140)	234 Points +75%
Lenovo Yoga Tab (Chrome 140)	181 Points +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (102 - 255, n=17)	170.4 Points +27%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)	155 Points +16%
Average of class Tablet (26 - 376, n=74, last 2 years)	137 Points +2%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro (Chrome 141)	134 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)	92645 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140)	89374 Points +17%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro (Chrome 141)	76383 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab (Chrome 140)	75238 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (25448 - 95506, n=24)	70725 Points -7%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)	65712 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 138481, n=98, last 2 years)	42755 Points -44%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (243 - 27101, n=83, last 2 years)	2600 ms * -449%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)	654.56 ms * -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (383 - 1170, n=19)	553 ms * -17%
Lenovo Yoga Tab (Chrome 140)	531.2 ms * -12%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro (Chrome 141)	473.3 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140)	392.3 ms * +17%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)	329.7 ms * +30%

* ... smaller is better

在存储性能方面，小米平板电脑的高数据传输率给人留下了深刻印象。UFS 4.1 标准提供了非常出色的读写速率。

	Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro	Lenovo Yoga Tab	Samsung Galaxy Tab S11	Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro	Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		27%	-41%	-6%	5%	-43%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	4083.3	3965.86 -3%	1694.53 -59%	3849.52 -6%	3809 ?(1954 - 4110, n=19) -7%	1739 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=86, last 2 years) -57%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	3252.32	3363.43 3%	1083.12 -67%	3283.91 1%	3258 ?(1240 - 4035, n=19) 0%	1295 ?(80.4 - 3773, n=86, last 2 years) -60%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	332.87	421.72 27%	298.38 -10%	302.34 -9%	380 ?(279 - 576, n=19) 14%	243 ?(20.1 - 475, n=86, last 2 years) -27%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	383.77	698.11 82%	283.45 -26%	346.85 -10%	439 ?(48.2 - 678, n=19) 14%	276 ?(9.1 - 989, n=86, last 2 years) -28%

游戏一款适合游戏玩家的有趣平板电脑

为了最大限度地发挥 Adreno GPU的性能，我们使用GameBench 软件查看 PlayStore 中《PUBG：Mobile》和《Genshin Impact》的准确帧率。在 144 Hz 的大屏幕上玩游戏无疑是非常有趣的。

在我们的测试游戏中，100 帧/秒以上的高帧率游戏是不可能实现的，但即使是要求苛刻的《Geshin Impact》也能流畅显示，尽管屏幕为 3.2K，也没有出现任何明显的掉帧现象。

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro; Genshin Impact: Ø59.6 (53-60)

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (50-61)

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (39-41)

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smoothest: Ø89.4 (79-99)

排放：功能强大的平板电脑，几乎没有节流

温度

在我们的负载情况下，平板电脑外壳的表面温度非常不均匀，但在热点区域也处于非临界水平。

在 3DMark 压力测试中，SoC 区域明显的废热导致的系统性能下降是显而易见的，尽管程度很低。

在 3DMark 压力测试中，我们确定节流低于 10%。

Max. Load

Idle


36.3 °C	38.6 °C	35.5 °C
33.2 °C	35.6 °C	31.4 °C
31.7 °C	32.8 °C	30.4 °C

Maximum: 38.6 °C
Average: 33.9 °C


33.2 °C	37.6 °C	41.2 °C
31.5 °C	32.5 °C	36.9 °C
31.2 °C	33.2 °C	35.1 °C

Maximum: 41.2 °C
Average: 34.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.6 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	93.1 %
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	88.7 % -5%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	79.5 % -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63.3 % -32%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	93.4 %
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	89.8 % -4%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	82.1 % -12%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	76.4 % -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	66.7 % -29%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	97.2 %
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	95.7 % -2%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	85.9 % -12%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	81.1 % -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	76 % -22%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	97.1 %
Lenovo Yoga Tab Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	89.3 %
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	80 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79.4 %

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø36 (35.5-38)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18 (17.6-19.6)

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø129.6 (127.5-137)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø65 (63.4-71.5)

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø36.8 (36.4-37.4)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø16.4 (16.2-16.9)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø7.81 (7.7-7.93)

扬声器

一般来说，平板电脑的优势之一是为音频系统提供了广阔的空间，小米 Pad 8 Pro 也不例外。凭借四扬声器，这款中端平板电脑可提供具有一定低音的良好音效，但粉红噪声测量显示中高音呈波浪状。

通过 USB-C 端口可以实现有线耳机解决方案。Pad 8 Pro 还支持蓝牙 5.4 版本，包括 Auracast 无线技术。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能量管理：Pad 8 Pro 提供续航能力

能源消耗

Pad 8 Pro 虽然机身纤薄，但却配备了一块容量为 9,200 毫安时的大容量电池。电池最大充电功率为 67 W，但不支持无线充电。在使用随机附带的电源适配器进行测试时，为平板电脑充满电大约需要 1.5 小时。

对于一款 11 英寸平板电脑来说，功耗值较低。闲置模式下的能耗略高于前代产品，约为 2 W。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.2 / 0.3 Watt
Idle	1.5 / 2 / 2.6 Watt
Load	6.7 / 15.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro 9200 mAh	Lenovo Yoga Tab 8860 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 8400 mAh	Apple iPad Air 11 2025 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro 8850 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite	Average of class Tablet
Power Consumption		15%	-68%	-41%	18%	11%	-45%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	1.5	1.2 20%	2.57 -71%	1.6 -7%	0.75 50%	1.101 ?(0.42 - 3.8, n=23) 27%	2.03 ?(0.7 - 5.6, n=79, last 2 years) -35%
Idle Average * (Watt)	2	1.4 30%	4.32 -116%	2.8 -40%	1.5 25%	1.672 ?(0.87 - 4.2, n=23) 16%	3.97 ?(1 - 9.2, n=79, last 2 years) -99%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	2.6	1.8 31%	4.36 -68%	4.7 -81%	1.56 40%	1.893 ?(0.94 - 4.8, n=23) 27%	4.32 ?(1.3 - 9.5, n=79, last 2 years) -66%
Load Average * (Watt)	6.7	7.8 -16%	12.54 -87%	11.4 -70%	7.92 -18%	8.88 ?(5.8 - 13, n=18) -33%	9.22 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=73, last 2 years) -38%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	15.7	13.9 11%	15.49 1%	16.8 -7%	16.5 -5%	13 ?(8.86 - 19.5, n=18) 17%	13.3 ?(4.6 - 41.6, n=73, last 2 years) 15%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø10.1 (4.44-15.7)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.02 (1.025-12.7)

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.883 (1.757-2.58)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.781 (0.697-1.46)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø15.6 (15.5-15.7)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.9 (11.3-12.5)

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.883 (1.757-2.58)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.781 (0.697-1.46)

电池寿命

小米平板电脑的续航能力达到了很好的水平，在我们的 Wi-Fi 浏览测试中，在调整显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m² 的情况下，可以持续近 20.5 小时。

这意味着 Pad 8 Pro 的续航时间几乎是 iPad Air 11 的两倍。 iPad Air 11.

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 141)		20h 26min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 31min

	Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro 9200 mAh	Lenovo Yoga Tab 8860 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 8400 mAh	Apple iPad Air 11 2025 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro 8850 mAh
Battery runtime		-13%	-45%	-19%	-14%
WiFi v1.3 (h)	20.4	17.7 -13%	11.2 -45%	11.7 -43%	17.6 -14%
Load (h)	3.5			3.7 6%
Reader / Idle (h)				25.6
H.264 (h)				12.9

Notebookcheck 对小米 Pad 8 Pro 的总体印象

小米 Pad 8 Pro 功能强大，运行速度极快，设计时尚。如果你不想等待全球版本，你可以以诱人的价格买到这款中端平板电脑的进口设备。

得益于性能的大幅提升，Pad 8 Pro 在我们的评级中大幅跃升，因此也获得了我们的最高评级奖。

如果您喜欢更大的屏幕，那您一定要看看我们对一加 Pad 3.

Back to the verdict

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro - 11/21/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

88 / 98 → 89%

Keyboard

70 / 80 → 88%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

47 / 69 → 68%

Weight

83 / 40-88 → 90%

Battery

92%

Display

87%

Games Performance

56 / 65 → 86%

Application Performance

83 / 92 → 90%

AI Performance

39%

Temperature

92%

Noise

100%

Audio

83 / 91 → 91%

Camera

66 / 90 → 73%

Average

68%

89%

Tablet - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
40%

Packaging
75%

Power Use
92.4%

Repairability
30%

Software Updates
61.7%

Total Sustainability Score: 49.9%

潜在替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 89.2%	Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $329.99 Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Ve... 2. $539.50 Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Ver... 3. $311.42 Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Ve... List Price: 600€	485 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	11.20" 3200x2136 344 PPI LCD
2. 88.2%	Lenovo Yoga Tab Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $279.99 Lenovo Idea Tab Pro with Goo... 2. $232.00 Lenovo Yoga 11 MTK 8185 4/128 3. $179.99 Lenovo Idea Tab - College Ta... List Price: 499€	458 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11.10" 3200x2000 340 PPI LTPS
3. 88.2%	Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 128 GB	Amazon: 1. $709.99 Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 256 G... 2. $649.99 Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 128 G... 3. $709.99 Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 256 G... List Price: 899€	469 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11.00" 2560x1600 274 PPI OLED - Dynamic AMOLED 2X
4. 87.4%	Apple iPad Air 11 2025 Apple M3 ⎘ Apple M3 9-Core GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe	Amazon: $449.00 List Price: 699€	460 g	128 GB NVMe	10.86" 2360x1640 265 PPI IPS
5. 86.5%	Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $649.99 Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Ver... 2. $539.50 Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Ver... 3. $489.50 Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Ver... List Price: 450€	500 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11.20" 3200x2136 344 PPI IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.