Notebookcheck Logo
三星Galaxy Tab S11 平板电脑评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）

极佳的平板电脑体验，但也有不足之处--三星Galaxy Tab S11 评测

声音专家

三星的紧凑型旗舰平板电脑提供了最好的硬件、长期更新，当然还有新的 S Pen。请阅读我们对Android 平板电脑的评测，看看我们是否被Galaxy Tab S11 及其 11 英寸 OLED 屏幕所折服。有趣的是，三星平板电脑有一点绝对领先于中国竞争对手。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Touchscreen Tablet

结论 - 三星Galaxy Tab S11

Galaxy Tab S11 在许多方面都不负其高端平板电脑的美誉。它的制造质量一流，OLED 屏幕非常明亮，扬声器对于一款小巧的设备来说也非常出色。Galaxy Tab S11 与其他中国竞争对手不同，它能很好地满足任何人在购买平板电脑时对透明度和可持续性的要求。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

尽管 Dimensity 9400+ 没有设定任何性能基准，但我们几乎找不到可以批评该芯片组的地方。三星平板电脑在负载情况下相对较高的节流行为理所当然地受到了更多批评。

Galaxy Tab S11 的电池续航时间和 OLED 面板的色彩校准，再加上 One UI 8 界面缺乏定制选项，都让人有些失望。指纹传感器在日常使用中也不太理想。

Pros

+ 明亮的 OLED 面板
+ 大功率扬声器
+ 防水外壳
+ 频繁更新
+ 包含 S Pen
+ 快速 SoC

Cons

- 色彩还原能力较弱
- 电池续航能力一般
- 指纹传感器速度稍慢
- 高节流
- 仅 UFS 3.1（128GB）
- 无 WiFi 7

价格和供货情况 - 三星Galaxy Tab S11

Galaxy Tab S11 有六种型号，最大 UFS 存储容量为 512 GB，内存为 12 GB。Wi-Fi 版起价 799 美元，可直接从制造商或亚马逊网站购买。

Amazon Logo
$859.99
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 256 GB WiFi Android Tablet, Large Display, Durable, Slim, Light, High Performance, Long Battery Life, S Pen for Note-Taking, AI Assist, US Version, Gray
  • $1,199.94
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Ai WiFi Model (Only for Latin America Market) 14.6" 11600 mAh 13MP SM-X930 Dual Camera with S Pen (Gray SM-X930NZSAGTO, 256GB + 12GB)
  • $144.99
    SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S11 Book Cover Keyboard Slim, AI Key Ready, PC-Like Experience, Sleek and Slim, US Version, Black

继去年的 Plus 机型Galaxy Tab S11 的升级。Tab Tab S9 的的继任者仍然是一款 11 英寸平板电脑。与更便宜的型号不同，如 Galaxy Tab S10 Lite或 Tab S10 FE不同，三星没有使用 Exynos 芯片，而是选择了 Dimensity 9400+.

规格 - 三星Galaxy Tab S11

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Processor
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ 8 x - 3.7 GHz, Cortex-X925, X4, A720
Graphics adapter
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
11.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 274 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, native pen support, OLED - Dynamic AMOLED 2X, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 104 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSDXC, up to 2TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, position sensor, hall sensor, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.4, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.5 x 253.8 x 165.3
Battery
8400 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/​2.0, AF)
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/​2.2, AF, ultra-wide angle)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo (4 speaker), USB cable, SIM tool, S Pen, One UI 8.0, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, LDAC, SSC | GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C), Galileo (E1), QZSS (L1) | no NavIC | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+ | DRM Widevine L1 | optional 5G | IP68 , fanless, waterproof
Weight
469 g
Price
899 Euro
Links
Samsung notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 -Android 平板电脑，铝合金一体成型机身

Galaxy 灰色和银色 Tab S11
Galaxy 灰色和银色 Tab S11

Galaxy Tab S11 采用铝制外壳，通过 IP68 认证，防尘防水。它的制造质量非常吸引人，一体式机身设计也体现了较高的质量水平。

与 前代Galaxy Tab S11 变得更薄、更轻。新功能之一是 S Pen 的位置，它通过磁力吸附在边框上，而不是背面。不过，83.6% 的屏占比明显低于 Ultra 机型，这意味着显示屏边框有些厚。

尺寸比较

❌
289.6 mm 209.6 mm 5.97 mm 675 g254.3 mm 165.8 mm 6 mm 497 g253.8 mm 165.3 mm 5.5 mm 469 g251.22 mm 173.42 mm 6.18 mm 500 g247.6 mm 178.5 mm 6.1 mm 460 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

功能 -Galaxy Tab S11 具有可扩展存储空间

三星为其Galaxy Tab S11 配备了快速 USB 3.2（Gen 1）端口。我们使用三星 980 Pro（M2 固态硬盘）测得的数据传输速度高达 351 MB/s。连接的存储设备可以使用 NTFS（只读）或 exFAT 格式进行格式化。在适配器的帮助下，该端口还可用作外接显示器的图像信号输出端口，而且由于采用了 USB OTG 技术，还可以轻松连接外围设备。

此外，还提供三星 DeX 接口和 Knox Vault 平台（使用专用处理器单元处理敏感数据）。其中一项新功能是 "扩展模式"，用于外接显示器的双屏设置，DeX 可在两个显示器上同时运行，并具有拖放功能。

microSD 读卡器

与许多 竞争对手不同Galaxy Tab S11 的存储空间可以通过存储卡进行扩展，容量最高可达 2 TB。结合我们的参考卡 AV PRO V60，我们实现了稳定的传输速度，但是 Galaxy Tab S10 FE的数据吞吐量要高得多。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580 (Angelbird V60)
57.4 MB/s +55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
37.15 MB/s
Average of class Tablet
  (10.2 - 58.4, n=60, last 2 years)
36.6 MB/s -1%

跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36 (21.6-45)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.8 (28.6-51.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø65.4 (48.4-76.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø85.1 (61.1-113.1)

软件 - 三星平板电脑提供长期更新

Galaxy Tab S11 已经运行Android 16，其中包括 One UI 8 用户界面。三星在软件中强调其多模态人工智能 "Gemini Live"，允许用户与人工智能助手实时互动。我们熟悉的Galaxy AI 功能，如绘画和写作助手，也在其中。

三星承诺为其平板电脑提供七次重大更新和七年的安全更新。不过，Tab S11 可能会按季度而不是按月接收补丁，这与其前代产品类似。我们的评测设备安装了 2025 年 8 月的安全补丁。

三星Galaxy Tab S11 平板电脑评测
三星Galaxy Tab S11 平板电脑评测
三星Galaxy Tab S11 平板电脑评测

可持续性

有关平板电脑可持续性的详细信息，请参阅环境报告和制造商数据表。包装由再生纸制成，框架周围没有薄膜。

通信与全球导航卫星系统 - 5GAndroid 平板电脑

虽然 Tab S11 系列中的紧凑型平板电脑只提供 Wi-Fi 6E，而不是现代的 Wi-Fi 7 标准，但它确实使用 6 GHz 频段进行 Wi-Fi 传输。在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 进行的测试中，它实现了非常高且相对稳定的传输速率，峰值超过 1,800 Mbps。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
970 (min: 946) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
981 (min: 963) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1827 (min: 1785) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1874 (min: 1677) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
642 (min: 539) MBit/s ∼35%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
746 (min: 680) MBit/s ∼40%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
991 (min: 512) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
895 (min: 751) MBit/s ∼91%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1011 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1484 (min: 1233) MBit/s ∼79%
OnePlus Pad 3
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
787 (min: 674) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1440 (min: 1058) MBit/s ∼77%
Average Wi-Fi 6E
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
956 (min: 227) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
942 (min: 442) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1381 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1342 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼72%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
543 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
609 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1240 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1478 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼79%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1827 (1785-1873)
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1011 (909-1117)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1870 (1677-1911)
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1484 (1233-1554)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø970 (946-1002)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø979 (963-986)
室内无法进行卫星定位
室内无法进行卫星定位
室外地点
室外地点

三星不仅在 5G 版本中安装了 GNSS 模块，而且还在我们的 Wi-Fi 型号中安装了该模块--支持所有常见的卫星系统，尽管只能使用单频连接。

为了测试其准确性，我们在Galaxy 平板电脑上安装了 Garmin Venu 2。Tab S11 可靠地绘制出了我们的路线，但也有一些明显的偏差。

Galaxy Tab S11 与 Garmin Venu 2 的对比
Galaxy Tab S11 与 Garmin Venu 2 的对比
 
 

摄像头 -Galaxy Tab S11 配备自动对焦功能

1200 万像素前置摄像头图像
1200 万像素前置摄像头图像

再次，Tab Galaxy Tab S9 的继任者配备了 1300 万像素后置摄像头，包括自动对焦和 4K 视频录制选项。作为一款平板电脑，它的拍照效果还算不错，在光线充足的条件下能拍出质量不错的照片，也适合将笔记数字化。除此之外，由于Galaxy Tab S11 的清晰度和动态范围都没有给我们留下深刻印象，因此应该使用智能手机拍照。

1x
1x
2x
2x
5x
5x
8 倍（最大值）
8 倍（最大值）

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Subject 1Subject 2Low lightZoom 5x
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
5.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
5 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S11: 7.13 ∆E min: 3.61 - max: 10.68 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
51 ∆E
38 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
42.2 ∆E
59.2 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
38.7 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
62.1 ∆E
60.1 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
70.1 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
69.1 ∆E
66.5 ∆E
49.8 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S11: 43.71 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 70.12 ∆E

配件和保修 - 带有 Care+ 的三星平板电脑

新款三星 S Pen
新款三星 S Pen

Galaxy Tab S11 没有附带电源适配器。除了一根 USB 数据线外，包装盒内只有信息和新的 S Pen。可单独购买配套的 Book Cover Keyboard Slim（建议零售价：145 美元）。

在德国。三星高端平板电脑提供 24 个月的 保修期可选择 Care+ 作为补充。

输入设备和操作 -Android 平板电脑内置指纹传感器

Galaxy Tab S11 的触摸屏反应灵敏，能准确转换我们的指尖输入。得益于 120 Hz 的刷新率，操作无比流畅。

S Pen 可通过磁力吸附在边框顶部，无需蓝牙连接即可使用。新功能不仅包括其在平板电脑上的位置，还包括其粗糙的材料表面和棱角分明的设计，让人联想到经典的铅笔。使用触控笔，三星平板电脑可提供愉悦的书写和绘画体验。

你可以用右手拇指轻松访问光学指纹传感器。不过，它的识别率和速度并没有给我们留下特别深刻的印象。二维面部识别也可用于生物识别安全。

显示屏：三星平板电脑采用 OLED 面板

子像素排列
子像素排列

三星 11 英寸 OLED 显示屏的峰值亮度为 1,600 cd/m²，像素密度为 274 PPI。令人欣慰的是，我们也成功测量了这一亮度（APL18：1,575 cd/m²，HDR：1,648 cd/m²）。

三星使用脉宽调制来控制显示屏亮度。在整个亮度范围内，OLED 的典型闪烁频率为 480 赫兹。

945
cd/m²		955
cd/m²		939
cd/m²
940
cd/m²		946
cd/m²		934
cd/m²
932
cd/m²		931
cd/m²		917
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 955 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 937.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.67 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 946 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.5 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.8}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.02
CCT: 6322 K
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
OLED - Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2560x1600, 11"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
IPS, 2304x1440, 10.9"		Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
IPS, 3200x2136, 11.2"		Apple iPad Air 11 2025
IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"		OnePlus Pad 3
IPS, 3392x2400, 13.2"
Screen
8%
4%
9%
7%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
946
663
-30%
776
-18%
508
-46%
687
-27%
Brightness (cd/m²)
938
617
-34%
750
-20%
497
-47%
641
-32%
Brightness Distribution (%)
96
84
-12%
91
-5%
93
-3%
88
-8%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
0.39
0.58
0.5
0.58
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.5
1.47
58%
1.6
54%
1.13
68%
2.03
42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.5
4.14
25%
4.5
18%
2.49
55%
3.38
39%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.4
1.4
42%
2.5
-4%
1.7
29%
1.8
25%
Gamma
2.02 109%
2.199 100%
2.23 99%
2.173 101%
2.159 102%
CCT
6322 103%
6730 97%
6892 94%
6747 96%
6727 97%
Contrast (:1)
1700
1338
1016
1184

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 480 Hz
Amplitude: 15.55 %

The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8214 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

以固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平缓，但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看）。

我们使用照片光谱仪和 CalMAN 软件进行的色彩还原分析表明，考虑到其价格区间，Tab S11 与 sRGB 色彩空间的 DeltaE 偏差有所增加。遗憾的是，新的 One UI 8 界面在色彩定制方面没有带来任何改进。仍需做出不必要的妥协（配置文件少、白色表现有限等）。

色彩准确度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩准确度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.758 ms rise
↘ 0.735 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.658 ms rise
↘ 0.634 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms).

Galaxy Tab S11 在户外使用非常方便，即使在阳光直射下，显示屏上的内容也清晰可见。在视角稳定性方面也没有发现任何问题，虽然从广角观看时会有轻微的偏红，但这在日常使用中应该不是大问题。

性能 -Galaxy Tab S11 配备顶级 SoC

Galaxy Tab S11 通过快速的 Dimensity 9400+处理器。在我们的基准测试中，作为一款 11 英寸的小巧设备，三星平板电脑的表现非常出色。 OnePlus Pad 3采用了 骁龙 8 精英版.

Geekbench 6.5 | Antutu v10 | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
OnePlus Pad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3194 Points +29%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
3019 Points +22%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (2478 - 2798, n=3)
2670 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
2478 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1973 Points -20%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=99, last 2 years)
1373 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
1367 Points -45%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
11773 Points +51%
OnePlus Pad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9302 Points +19%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (7787 - 9043, n=3)
8395 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
7787 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5127 Points -34%
Average of class Tablet
  (848 - 14690, n=99, last 2 years)
4380 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
3921 Points -50%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (2396591 - 2841845, n=3)
2583409 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
2396591 Points
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
2045290 Points -15%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2854581, n=70, last 2 years)
1078999 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
894364 Points -63%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
Points -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
12637 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (12211 - 12637, n=3)
12402 Points -2%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8895 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
6058 Points -52%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 13159, n=65, last 2 years)
5494 Points -57%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
16271 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (13894 - 16550, n=3)
15572 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
10013 Points -38%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
9937 Points -39%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 18343, n=65, last 2 years)
8794 Points -46%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
13578 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
12938 Points -5%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (11533 - 13578, n=3)
12765 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
7554 Points -44%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 17963, n=65, last 2 years)
6443 Points -53%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
55053 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (54322 - 55053, n=3)
54683 Points -1%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
24738 Points -55%
Average of class Tablet
  (88 - 57192, n=65, last 2 years)
14098 Points -74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
10293 Points -81%
Web
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (2152 - 2267, n=3)
2215 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
2152 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1928 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
1730 Points -20%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2370, n=65, last 2 years)
1465 Points -32%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
76843 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (72895 - 76843, n=3)
74292 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 76843, n=67, last 2 years)
15099 Points -80%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
14738 Points -81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
10741 Points -86%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (1143 - 1233, n=3)
1180 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
1143 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (166 - 1483, n=20, last 2 years)
532 Points -53%
OnePlus Pad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
284 Points -75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
268 Points -77%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (8659 - 9597, n=3)
9108 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
9067 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (154 - 9666, n=20, last 2 years)
2140 Points -76%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
270 Points -97%
OnePlus Pad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
267 Points -97%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (11834 - 13099, n=3)
12452 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
12422 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (88 - 13178, n=20, last 2 years)
3124 Points -75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
634 Points -95%
OnePlus Pad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
629 Points -95%
AI Benchmark - Score V6
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
12632 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (1945 - 12713, n=3)
9097 Points -28%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
3686 Points -71%
Average of class Tablet
  (70.4 - 12784, n=23, last 2 years)
3637 Points -71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
300 Points -98%

一个 Immortalis G925 MP12负责图形任务。在 GFXbench 中，Tab S11 取得了不错的成绩，但也低于 OnePlus Pad 3.

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Pad 3
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6681 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6388 Points
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
5611 Points -12%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3283 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1488 Points -77%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Pad 3
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6679 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6353 Points
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
5190 Points -18%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3201 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1519 Points -76%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 3
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25466 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23674 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12074 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5184 Points -78%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
OnePlus Pad 3
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11833 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11564 Points
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
5675 Points -51%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5212 Points -55%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 3
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11928 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11543 Points
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
8906 Points -23%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5182 Points -55%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2491 Points
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
2088 Points -16%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1075 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
677 Points -73%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2577 Points
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
2572 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1098 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
696 Points -73%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps -26%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
788 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
592 fps -25%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
449 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
153 fps -81%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps -41%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
511 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
450 fps -12%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
267 fps -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps -79%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 fps -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -55%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
359 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
238 fps -34%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
183 fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps -77%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -42%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps -66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -69%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
177 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
159 fps -10%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps -74%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -32%
OnePlus Pad 3
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps -43%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
30 fps -66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25 fps -72%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 3
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
107 fps +19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
64.2 fps -29%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -76%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -49%
OnePlus Pad 3
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps -58%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps -61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -69%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 3
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
260 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
233 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
208 fps -11%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
145 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -77%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 3
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
35.2 fps -12%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.7 fps -76%
Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140)
309.456 Points
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)
303.591 Points -2%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (134.6 - 365, n=3)
270 Points -13%
Average of class Tablet (61.3 - 456, n=26, last 2 years)
205 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
169.88 Points -45%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140)
234 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (112 - 235, n=3)
193.7 Points -17%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
155 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
138 Points -41%
Average of class Tablet (26 - 315, n=75, last 2 years)
129.6 Points -45%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)
92645 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140)
89374 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (36745 - 94555, n=3)
73558 Points -18%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
65712 Points -26%
OnePlus Pad 3 (Chrome 139)
56667 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
50864 Points -43%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=103, last 2 years)
39205 Points -56%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 27101, n=84, last 2 years)
2687 ms * -585%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
790.8 ms * -102%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
654.56 ms * -67%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (391 - 612, n=3)
465 ms * -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140)
392.3 ms *
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)
329.7 ms * +16%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXiaomi Pad 7 ProOnePlus Pad 3Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-10%
88%
92%
-18%
-11%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
1694.53
1602.8
-5%
3849.52
127%
3796
124%
1591 ?(529 - 3134, n=67)
-6%
1530 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=87, last 2 years)
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
1083.12
1271.5
17%
3283.91
203%
3329
207%
762 ?(233 - 1745, n=67)
-30%
1124 ?(80.4 - 3773, n=87, last 2 years)
4%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
298.38
225.1
-25%
302.34
1%
316
6%
243 ?(126.2 - 428, n=67)
-19%
225 ?(20.1 - 475, n=87, last 2 years)
-25%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
283.45
204.2
-28%
346.85
22%
368
30%
240 ?(61.8 - 503, n=67)
-15%
248 ?(9.1 - 745, n=87, last 2 years)
-13%

排放 - 三星平板电脑具有热点功能

温度

在持续负载情况下，三星平板电脑的外壳会不均匀地发热，并伴有适度的节流现象。3DMark 测试显示，长时间负载时性能下降约为 15%至 40%。

Max. Load
 43.5 °C35.2 °C30.7 °C 
 47.1 °C37.1 °C31.7 °C 
 45 °C37.5 °C31.1 °C 
Maximum: 47.1 °C
Average: 37.7 °C
32 °C38.6 °C46.8 °C
31.7 °C36.3 °C46.7 °C
30.5 °C34.8 °C3.7 °C
Maximum: 46.8 °C
Average: 33.5 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 % +56%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.7 % +40%
OnePlus Pad 3
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 % +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63.3 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97.7 % +46%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89.8 % +35%
OnePlus Pad 3
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.1 % +23%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
76.4 % +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66.7 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95.7 % +26%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
81.1 % +7%
OnePlus Pad 3
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79.8 % +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.1 % +25%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
97.1 % +22%
OnePlus Pad 3
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.4 % +3%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
80 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79.4 %
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø28.6 (25.8-38.6)
OnePlus Pad 3 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø34.3 (32.3-39.4)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø88.3 (78.5-124.1)
OnePlus Pad 3 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø118.7 (106.8-138.7)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø32.2 (28.4-37.4)
OnePlus Pad 3 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø36.3 (31.6-39.6)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø15.2 (14.3-18)
OnePlus Pad 3 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø16 (15.2-18.7)

发言人

Galaxy Tab S11 的四个扬声器可提供出色的音质。中音和高音再现线性，低音也很明显。对于一款 11 英寸平板电脑来说，这样的音质非常吸引人。

音频内容可通过 USB-C 端口播放，蓝牙 5.4 可无线使用--尽管音频编解码器的数量相当有限。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.935.32524.322.63120.727.14018.127.25030.836.16321.733.88014.841.310017.245.912514.356.216017.166.520014.366.925014.266.931514.568.94001368.450011.871.863013.27480010.975.2100011.776125011.479.9160011.777.8200012.375.525001374315012.871.9400012.474.6500013.973.4630013.569.580001368.71000013.672.31250013.765.3160001356.2SPL24.886.9N0.673.4median 13median 71.9Delta1.244643.639.138.333.237.337.836.540.139.725.529.416.535.917.744.819.551.617.457.215.86216.36414.767.51363.41767.920.669.12167.818.874.217.178.815.878.31475.912.473.512.271.212.56912.165.612.464.712.273.212.271.212.164.411.762.727.885.60.963.5median 14.7median 67.82.74.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab S11Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池运行时间 -Android 平板电脑的充电速度并不快

耗电量

8,400 毫安时电池的最大充电功率可达 45 瓦。与 小米 25000 移动电源充电时间约为 1.5 小时。11 英寸平板电脑的功耗可能会更低，尤其是在闲置时，超过 4 瓦的功耗明显高于 小米 Pad 7 Pro.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.15 / 0.39 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.57 / 4.32 / 4.36 Watt
Load midlight 12.54 / 15.49 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
8400 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
8000 mAh		Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
8850 mAh		Apple iPad Air 11 2025
 mAh		Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
 		Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
39%
46%
13%
-8%
17%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
2.57
2.1
18%
0.75
71%
1.6
38%
3.05 ?(2.57 - 3.9, n=3)
-19%
2 ?(0.7 - 5.6, n=79, last 2 years)
22%
Idle Average * (Watt)
4.32
2.5
42%
1.5
65%
2.8
35%
4.98 ?(4.3 - 6.31, n=3)
-15%
3.77 ?(1 - 9.2, n=79, last 2 years)
13%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
4.36
2.9
33%
1.56
64%
4.7
-8%
5.2 ?(4.36 - 6.35, n=3)
-19%
4.11 ?(1.3 - 9.5, n=79, last 2 years)
6%
Load Average * (Watt)
12.54
5.8
54%
7.92
37%
11.4
9%
11.4 ?(9.4 - 12.5, n=3)
9%
9.13 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=75, last 2 years)
27%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
15.49
7.9
49%
16.5
-7%
16.8
-8%
14.5 ?(12.1 - 15.8, n=3)
6%
12.9 ?(4.6 - 41.6, n=75, last 2 years)
17%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.84 (2.85-15.6)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.63 (2.02-11.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.2 (3.17-3.41)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.11 (2.03-2.46)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.5 (10.9-15.3)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.27 (6.81-7.84)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.2 (3.17-3.41)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.11 (2.03-2.46)

电池寿命

在亮度为 150 cd/m² 的实际电池测试中，Galaxy Tab S11 明显优于前代产品 前代产品.尽管如此，电池续航时间还是略微令人失望。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 140)
11h 14min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
8400 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
8000 mAh		Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
8850 mAh		Apple iPad Air 11 2025
 mAh		OnePlus Pad 3
12140 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
8400 mAh
Battery runtime
WiFi v1.3 (h)
11.2
14.8
32%
17.6
57%
11.7
4%
23.9
113%
9
-20%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Galaxy Tab S11 评测
Galaxy Tab S11 评测

Galaxy Tab S11 是 iPad Air 11 的不错替代品，但这款三星平板电脑也有一些不必要的弱点。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 - 10/02/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
89 / 98 → 91%
Keyboard
70 / 80 → 87%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
63 / 69 → 91%
Weight
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Battery
89%
Display
89%
Games Performance
43 / 65 → 65%
Application Performance
82 / 92 → 89%
AI Performance
77%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
91 / 91 → 100%
Camera
66 / 90 → 73%
Average
81%
88%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
83.2%
Materials
65%
Packaging
95%
Power Use
91.5%
Repairability
68%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 83.8%

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
88.2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 128 GB 		Amazon:
1. $859.99
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 256 G...
2. $1,199.94
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra...
3. $144.99
SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S11 Book ...
List Price: 899€		469 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash11.00"
2560x1600
274 PPI
OLED - Dynamic AMOLED 2X
2.
81.6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 540 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon: $599.99
List Price: 779€		497 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash10.90"
2304x1440
249 PPI
IPS
3.
86.5%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $595.00
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Ver...
2. $389.00
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version...
3. $262.39
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Ve...
List Price: 450€		500 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash11.20"
3200x2136
344 PPI
IPS
4.
87.4%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
Apple M3 ⎘
Apple M3 9-Core GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe		Amazon: $449.00
List Price: 699€		460 g128 GB NVMe10.86"
2360x1640
265 PPI
IPS
5.
88.4%
OnePlus Pad 3
OnePlus Pad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon: $600.99
List Price: 699€		675 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash13.20"
3392x2400
315 PPI
IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 极佳的平板电脑体验，但也有不足之处--三星Galaxy Tab S11 评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-10- 6 (Update: 2025-10- 6)