Apple iPad Air M4 2026 的结论
事实证明，iPad Air 2026 更像是一次强制性更新，而非真正的革命：虽然新的处理器将平板电脑的性能提升到了新的高度，Apple ，甚至还将较贵型号的价格降低了几美元，但该设备的其他变化都不大，例如更快的 Wi-Fi 标准和额外增加的几克重量。
而在运行时间、扬声器音效、显示屏和摄像头方面，则没有任何变化。在外壳和可选颜色方面也是如此，Apple 。
在生产性使用方面，Apple iPadOS 仍不如 MacOS 好用。因此，iPad 能否完全取代 MacBook，还取决于你将使用哪些应用程序，这需要你自己决定。
有一点很清楚：与Apple 相比，OLED 屏幕或大容量存储空间的拥趸仍能在Android 找到更便宜的产品。不过，对于那些可以接受 IPS 显示屏并已将数据存储在云中的用户来说，Apple ，第八代 iPad Air 2026 肯定能以合理的价格为用户提供强大的功能。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
Apple的中端平板电脑又回来了，现在它支持手写笔、Wi-Fi 7、色彩精确的显示屏和Apple M4 电源。它旨在赢得休闲用户和专业人士的青睐。此外，与 iPad Pro 相比，它的性价比更高。
今天，我们就来看看 11 英寸版 iPad Air 2026（仅限 WLAN 版），以便告诉你它到底有哪些新功能--以及是否值得购买。
规格
外壳 - 质量高、重量轻
iPad Air 11 (2026) 的铝合金一体成型外壳是典型的Apple ：质量高、重量轻、手感舒适。尽管如此，它的重量还是增加了几克，达到 464 或 465 克（Wi-Fi 或蜂窝网络版本）。
屏幕边框相对较宽，但这至少有助于防止误触。注意：平板电脑不防水也不防尘--快速溅水可能不成问题，但应避免更多的溅水。
有四种颜色可供选择：太空灰、紫色、蓝色和星光色--一种微妙的米色。
连接性 - 更便宜的存储升级
iPad Air 11 (2026) 的起价为 599 美元（128 GB，Wi-Fi）。所有机型均配备 12GB 内存。
如果希望获得更大的存储空间或蜂窝网络连接能力，则需要支付更高的价格，不过与去年相比，升级版的价格实际上已经有所下降。
- 256 GB 存储空间：699 美元（WiFi）/849 美元（WiFi + 蜂窝电话）
- 512 GB 存储空间：899 美元（WiFi）/1049 美元（WiFi + 蜂窝电话）
- 1 TB 存储空间：1,099 美元（WiFi）/1,249 美元（WiFi + 蜂窝电话）
其 USB-C 端口支持 10 GBit/s，可输出高达 6K 的显示信号。可通过背面的三个 Pogo 针连接配件。
该平板电脑的蜂窝版本仅支持 eSIM 卡。
软件 - iPadOS 现在按年份编号
Apple 现在，iPadOS 以发布年份命名：第八代 iPad Air 预装了 iPadOS 26.4。它现在采用了我们从新款 iPhone 上已经了解到的 Liquid Glass 设计，具有部分透明的表面和优化的多任务窗口管理。复杂的进程现在可以在后台运行，让你可以继续使用 iPad。
Apple 目前，苹果官方还没有说明新软件版本将在多长时间内适用于 iPad Air。不过，根据以往设备的使用经验，更新通常至少会持续六年。
可持续性
iPad Air 使用 30% 的可回收材料制造，其锂和钴元件几乎全部回收利用。
其碳足迹保持不变，最低容量机型的碳足迹为 76 千克。Apple 还发布了该产品详细的环境报告。该产品的详细环境报告。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Apple 设备上的 Wi-Fi 7
iPad Air 11 (2026) 现在首次支持 Wi-Fi 7，实现了更快、更稳定的连接。遗憾的是，我们还不能测试 Wi-Fi 7 网络；不过，使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器，该平板电脑在 Wi-Fi 6E 范围内的速度达到了约 1,700 Mbps（下载）和超过 1,100 Mbps（上传）。在整个测试过程中，连接非常稳定。
要想获得精确的卫星定位，您需要 5G 型号。
| Networking | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
摄像头 - 支持 4K 视频
今年也没有更新摄像头：这款平板电脑的 1200 万像素后置摄像头效果不错，但质量还达不到智能手机的水平。
在光线充足的情况下，照片看起来很自然，但在光线不足的情况下，质量很快就会下降。后期处理的虚化效果并不总是最好的。
用户可以 60 帧/秒的速度录制 4K 视频，效果不错，自动对焦反应也很快。
它的前置摄像头能拍出不错的自拍照，但不宜放大太多。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low light
附件和保修 - 仅包括一条 USB 电缆
平板电脑的供货范围仅包括一条 USB 线缆。
Magic Keyboard（269 美元）配有功能键和 USB-C 端口。它兼容Apple Pencil（79 美元）或Apple Pencil Pro（129 美元）。它通过磁力吸附在设备的顶部边缘。
iPad 提供 12 个月的保修服务，可通过 AppleCare+ 延长保修期（起价 5.99 美元/月）。
输入设备和操作 - 不那么灵敏
iPad 的触摸屏反应灵敏，但与刷新率更高的平板电脑相比，60 赫兹的显示屏感觉不够流畅。
待机键上的指纹传感器工作可靠。
显示屏 - 500 尼特亮度
与前代产品一样，该设备的 10.86 英寸 IPS 显示屏分辨率为 2360 x 1640 像素（265 PPI）。
其亮度约为 500 cd/m²，足以在室内使用，但不适合在明亮的阳光下使用。
虽然支持 HDR，但该平板电脑的最大亮度较低，显示效果并不出众。
屏幕没有 PWM 闪烁现象。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 513 cd/m²
Contrast: 1140:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.92 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.99}
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.222
CCT: 7102 K
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9" | Apple iPad Air 11 2025 IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 OLED - Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2560x1600, 11" | Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro LCD, 3200x2136, 11.2" | Lenovo Yoga Tab LTPS, 3200x2000, 11.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 11% | 11% | 20% | 15% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 513 | 508 -1% | 946 84% | 626 22% | 609 19% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 510 | 497 -3% | 938 84% | 617 21% | 583 14% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 93 -5% | 96 -2% | 96 -2% | 91 -7% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.45 | 0.5 -11% | 0.3 33% | 0.4 11% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 1140 | 1016 -11% | 2087 83% | 1523 34% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.92 | 1.13 41% | 3.5 -82% | 1.64 15% | 1.81 6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.12 | 2.49 40% | 5.5 -33% | 4.13 -0% | 2.98 28% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 1.7 39% | 2.4 14% | 3.1 -11% | 2.5 11% |
| Gamma | 2.222 99% | 2.173 101% | 2.02 109% | 2.2 100% | 1.934 114% |
| CCT | 7102 92% | 6747 96% | 6322 103% | 6746 96% | 6853 95% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7914 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行测试时，我们注意到有轻微的偏蓝现象，尤其是在显示较浅的灰色和白色时。
不过，这并不是太大的问题，总的来说，色彩还原得很好。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.3 ms). | ||
性能 - 平板电脑动力十足
新功能是 2026Apple iPad Air 11 现在采用Apple M4 芯片。这种芯片也用于 iMac 和 MacBook Pro（配备更多处理器内核）。它比去年的 iPad Air 性能提高了约 15-20%。
因此，对于这款平板电脑来说，延迟已经成为过去，即使是要求苛刻的任务，它也能轻松应对。
就图形性能而言，该 SoC 可与高端 SoC 相媲美。限制游戏性能的因素更可能是平板电脑的 60 赫兹显示屏。
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
使用 iPad Air 2026 上网速度超快。你可能遇到的唯一延迟更可能是由于网络连接不畅造成的。
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0 | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 (Safari 26) | |
| Average Apple M4 8-Core (n=1) | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18) | |
| Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 790, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0 | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 (Safari 26) | |
| Average Apple M4 8-Core (n=1) | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro (Chrome 141) | |
| Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 49.1, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 (Safari 26) | |
| Average Apple M4 8-Core (n=1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab (Chrome 140) | |
| Average of class Tablet (39 - 376, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro (Chrome 141) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 (Safari 26) | |
| Average Apple M4 8-Core (n=1) | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro (Chrome 141) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab (Chrome 140) | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 138481, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Tablet (243 - 27101, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab (Chrome 140) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro (Chrome 141) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140) | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18) | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 (Safari 26) | |
| Average Apple M4 8-Core (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
遗憾的是，iPadOS 没有可靠的存储基准，因此我们只能依靠我们的实际测试经验：事实证明，NVMe 存储速度非常快，在整个测试过程中都能实现快速加载。
排放 - 可能会出现一些节流
温度
平板电脑在长时间负载下产生的废热略高于前代机型，但仍无需担心。我们还观察到 iPad Air 11 M4 2026 出现了一些节流现象，在某些情况下，这种现象比前代机型要明显得多。
即便如此，我们通过 3DMark 压力测试确定，在长时间负载后，iPad Air 11 M4 2026 仍能保持至少三分之二的电量。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.6 °C / 92 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 2025 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 | |
发言人
该设备的立体声扬声器功能强大，声音温暖，但没有真正的低音。
外接音频设备可通过 USB-C 端口或蓝牙 6 连接。无线音频编解码器的支持仅限于Apple的 AAC 和 SBC，听起来并不令人印象深刻。
Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (20.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - 适合日常使用的续航能力
耗电量
它的功耗略低于前代机型，最大功耗略低于 17 瓦。
平板电脑的充电功率高达 20 瓦，充电时间不超过 2 小时 15 分钟即可。
| Off / Standby |   0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Idle |  2 / 2.9 / 3.7 Watt |
| Load |
10.9 / 16.9 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 7606 mAh | Apple iPad Air 11 2025 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 8400 mAh | Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro 9200 mAh | Lenovo Yoga Tab 8860 mAh | Average Apple M4 8-Core | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -2% | -21% | 26% | 38% | 0% | -5% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 2 | 1.6 20% | 2.57 -29% | 1.5 25% | 1.2 40% | 2 ? -0% | 2.06 ? -3% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 2.9 | 2.8 3% | 4.32 -49% | 2 31% | 1.4 52% | 2.9 ? -0% | 4.01 ? -38% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 3.7 | 4.7 -27% | 4.36 -18% | 2.6 30% | 1.8 51% | 3.7 ? -0% | 4.36 ? -18% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 10.9 | 11.4 -5% | 12.54 -15% | 6.7 39% | 7.8 28% | 10.9 ? -0% | 9.23 ? 15% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 16.9 | 16.8 1% | 15.49 8% | 15.7 7% | 13.9 18% | 16.9 ? -0% | 13.6 ? 20% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
运行时间
在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，其 7606 毫安时电池可持续使用约 12 小时。这比配备相同容量电池的前代产品略长。
虽然一些同价位的Android 平板电脑的电池续航时间要长得多，但 iPad 的电池续航时间对于日常使用还是足够的。
| Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 7606 mAh | Apple iPad Air 11 2025 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 8400 mAh | Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro 9200 mAh | Lenovo Yoga Tab 8860 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -2% | -7% | 35% | 48% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 25.4 | 25.6 1% | 37.2 46% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 12 | 11.7 -2% | 11.2 -7% | 20.4 70% | 17.7 48% |
| Load (h) | 3.9 | 3.7 -5% | 3.5 -10% | ||
| H.264 (h) | 12.9 | 16.6 |
Notebookcheck 总评分
Apple iPad Air 2026 配备了速度更快的 SoC，即Apple M4，但除此之外，与去年相比变化甚微。
Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026
- 04/09/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 87.5%  | Apple iPad Air 11 M4 2026 Apple M4 8-Core ⎘ Apple M4 9-Core GPU ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe | List Price: 600€ | 464 g | 128 GB NVMe | 10.86" 2360x1640 265 PPI IPS |
2. 87.4%  | Apple iPad Air 11 2025 Apple M3 ⎘ Apple M3 9-Core GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe | List Price: 699€ | 460 g | 128 GB NVMe | 10.86" 2360x1640 265 PPI IPS |
3. 88.2%  | Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 128 GB | List Price: 899€ | 469 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 11.00" 2560x1600 274 PPI OLED - Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
4. 89.2%  | Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | List Price: 600€ | 485 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 11.20" 3200x2136 344 PPI LCD |
5. 88.2%  | Lenovo Yoga Tab Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | List Price: 499€ | 458 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 11.10" 3200x2000 340 PPI LTPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
