Notebookcheck Logo

戴尔Inspiron 15 5518笔记本电脑在审查。CPU的速度变慢了

包装不均匀。 Inspiron 15 5518提供Core i5-11300H处理器，GeForce-MX450 GPU和8GB工作内存。后者在单通道模式下工作。积极的一面。这款笔记本提供非常好的电池运行时间，并为两个NVMe SSD提供空间。
Geforce Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Tiger Lake Windows

戴尔在其产品线中推出了一款15.6英寸的全能型产品Inspiron 15 5518，它采用了 酷睿i5-11300H-CPU和一个 GeForce-MX450-GPU。竞争对手包括以下设备 小米红米书Pro 15，以及 惠普Pavilion 15，以及 联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6和 华硕VivoBook S15 D533UA.

Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR (Inspiron 15 5000 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-11300H 4 x 3.1 - 4.4 GHz, 51 W PL2 / Short Burst, 25 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H35
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1575 MHz, Memory: 1751 MHz, 25 W TDP, GDDR5, 30.0.14.7168, Optimus
Memory
8 GB 
, DDR4-3200, Single-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (one in use)
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE NV15N4V, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Storage
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe, 512 GB 
, 2 M.2-Slots (NVMe) - 1x M.2280/2230, 1x M.2-2230), 404 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC3204
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Headset combined port, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, 1 Fingerprint Reader, TPM 2.0
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 356 x 229
Battery
54 Wh, 3420 mAh Lithium-Ion, 4-cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, McAfee Security (Trial), Microsoft 365 (Trial), 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.8 kg, Power Supply: 314 g
Price
799 Euro
Links
Dell homepage
Dell notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82.3 %
09/2021
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450		1.8 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1080
81.2 %
07/2021
HP Pavilion 15-eg
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450		1.7 kg17.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.2 %
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
i7-11370H, GeForce MX450		1.7 kg16 mm15.60"3200x2000
86 %
08/2021
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450		1.9 kg18.4 mm16.00"2560x1600
82.1 %
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
R7 5700U, Vega 8		1.8 kg16.1 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.5 %
08/2021
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
R5 5500U, Vega 7		1.7 kg19.1 mm15.60"1920x1080

外壳和功能 - Inspiron配备了一个别致的金属外壳

戴尔依靠光滑别致的设计，为Inspiron超薄的哑光银灰色金属外壳提供了光滑的表面。笔记本电脑没有发现任何制造缺陷，但整体上应该更硬。底座和盖子可以扭动得太厉害。电池安装牢固。拆除底壳后，可以接触到内件。

Inspiron有两个USB-A端口（USB 3.2 Gen 1）和一个USB-C端口（USB 3.2 Gen 2x2；Core i7型号：Thunderbolt 4）。后者支持Power Delivery和Displayport-per-USB-C。因此，5518有两个视频输出，加上HDMI插槽。SD存储卡阅读器（参考卡：AV PRO SD 128 GB V60）属于慢速型号。

在最佳条件下确定的WLAN数据速率（附近没有其他WLAN设备，笔记本和服务器PC之间距离较短；路由器。Netgear Nighthawk AX12）结果不错，但仍然略低于所安装的英特尔AX201芯片的能力。

Size comparison

❌
360.2 mm 234 mm 17.9 mm 1.7 kg359.8 mm 233.8 mm 16.1 mm 1.8 kg356.67 mm 233.13 mm 19.1 mm 1.7 kg356 mm 251 mm 18.4 mm 1.9 kg356 mm 229 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg351 mm 242 mm 16 mm 1.7 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接设备

左侧。电源端口，HDMI，USB 3.2 Gen 1（A型），USB 3.2 Gen 2x2（C型；电力传输，显示端口）。
左侧。电源端口，HDMI，USB 3.2 Gen 1（A型），USB 3.2 Gen 2x2（C型；电力传输，显示端口）。
右侧：存储卡阅读器（SD）、USB 3.2 Gen 1（A型）、音频组合
右侧：存储卡阅读器（SD）、USB 3.2 Gen 1（A型）、音频组合
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 15-eg
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
66.7 MB/s +232%
Average of class Office
  (8 - 82.7, n=49, last 2 years)
53 MB/s +164%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
35 MB/s +74%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28.2 MB/s +40%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
  (AV Pro SD 128 GB V60)
20.1 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
90.6 MB/s +222%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77.8 MB/s +177%
Average of class Office
  (25 - 90.5, n=43, last 2 years)
64.7 MB/s +130%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
36.9 MB/s +31%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
36.5 MB/s +30%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
  (AV Pro SD 128 GB V60)
28.1 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1420 (686min - 1498max) MBit/s +54%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1367 (960min - 1479max) MBit/s +48%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1197 (1057min - 1282max) MBit/s +30%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s +26%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1138 (844min - 1286max) MBit/s +23%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
922 (830min - 996max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1434 (1199min - 1500max) MBit/s +11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1343 (650min - 1573max) MBit/s +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1339 (1289min - 1364max) MBit/s +3%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1295 (1107min - 1485max) MBit/s
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1276 (1239min - 1312max) MBit/s -1%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s -3%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550Tooltip
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1295 (1107-1485)
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1433 (1199-1500)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1343 (650-1573)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1339 (1289-1364)
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000); iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1276 (1239-1312)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø621 (506-708)
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø922 (830-996)
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1197 (1057-1282)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1397 (686-1498)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1367 (960-1479)
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000); iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1139 (844-1286)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø876 (431-988)
ColorChecker
35 ∆E
30.5 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
34.6 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
35 ∆E
37 ∆E
34 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
33.3 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR: 27.94 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 38.6 ∆E

输入设备 - 戴尔5518提供按键照明

发光木制键盘上略显粗糙的按键行程较短，压力点清晰。键的阻力是令人愉快的。键盘在打字过程中会有一点弯曲--在中间比在边缘更多。照明（两个亮度级别）是通过一个功能键控制的。总而言之，戴尔在这里提供了一个适合日常使用的键盘。

具有多点触摸功能的ClickPad（约11.5 x 8厘米/~4.5 x 3.2英寸）即使在角落里也能对输入做出反应。光滑的表面使手指很容易滑行。垫子的行程很短，有一个清晰的压力点。

输入设备 Inspiron
输入设备 Inspiron

显示器 - 板载IPS

虽然15.6英寸的哑光显示屏（1,920 x 1,080像素）提供了良好的对比度（1,040:1），但亮度（267.8 cd/m²）太低。在电池模式下，该值进一步下降。我们认为超过300cd/m²的数值是好的。

在90%及以下的亮度水平下，屏幕显示频率为1000赫兹的闪烁。由于频率相当高，敏感的人应该可以免于头痛和/或眼睛问题。

271
cd/m²		276
cd/m²		269
cd/m²
259
cd/m²		286
cd/m²		265
cd/m²
249
cd/m²		277
cd/m²		258
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE NV15N4V tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 286 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 267.8 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 257 cd/m²
Contrast: 1040:1 (Black: 0.275 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.57 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
41.24% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.92% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
BOE NV15N4V, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		HP Pavilion 15-eg
Chi Mei CMN1523, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
IPS, 3200x2000, 15.60		Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Lenovo LEN160WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00		Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Chi Mei N156HCA-EAB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
Lenovo LEN156FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
8%
66%
78%
10%
-4%
Display P3 Coverage
39.92
42.9
7%
66.7
67%
74
85%
43.6
9%
sRGB Coverage
58.8
64
9%
96.3
64%
98.7
68%
65.2
11%
59
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
41.24
44.4
8%
68.5
66%
74.5
81%
45
9%
38
-8%
Response Times
867%
19%
71%
48%
36%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41 ?(21, 20)
22.8 ?(10, 12.8)
44%
34.8 ?(17.2, 17.6)
15%
13 ?(6, 7)
68%
18 ?(8, 10)
56%
29 ?(13, 16)
29%
Response Time Black / White *
31 ?(17, 14)
23.6 ?(13.6, 10)
24%
24 ?(12.4, 11.6)
23%
8 ?(4, 4)
74%
19 ?(10, 9)
39%
18 ?(9, 9)
42%
PWM Frequency
1000 ?(90)
26320 ?(43)
2532%
Screen
-27%
-27%
10%
-30%
-64%
Brightness middle
286
294.3
3%
312
9%
356
24%
289
1%
376
31%
Brightness
268
251
-6%
298
11%
322
20%
267
0%
341
27%
Brightness Distribution
87
76
-13%
87
0%
80
-8%
85
-2%
78
-10%
Black Level *
0.275
0.26
5%
0.18
35%
0.27
2%
0.56
-104%
0.66
-140%
Contrast
1040
1132
9%
1733
67%
1319
27%
516
-50%
570
-45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.74
4.08
14%
5.39
-14%
2.4
49%
3.96
16%
6.4
-35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.27
19.49
-136%
9.95
-20%
4.42
47%
6.76
18%
20.45
-147%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.57
3
-91%
6.3
-301%
2.81
-79%
3.43
-118%
4.59
-192%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.21 100%
2.192 100%
2.4 92%
2.28 96%
2.26 97%
CCT
6348 102%
6616 98%
7473 87%
6294 103%
7191 90%
6819 95%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.7
3.15
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
69
42
38
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96
65
59
Total Average (Program / Settings)
283% / 172%
19% / 2%
53% / 35%
9% / -9%
-11% / -37%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1000 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在交付状态下，屏幕有一个体面的颜色再现，但颜色有点偏离目标--整体仍在可接受范围内。它不存在偏蓝的问题。该显示器不能再现AdobeRGB（41%）、sRGB（59%）和DCI-P3（40%）色彩空间。

CalMAN - 颜色检查器
CalMAN - 颜色检查器
CalMAN - 灰度
CalMAN - 灰度
CalMAN - 色彩饱和度
CalMAN - 色彩饱和度

视角稳定的IPS面板可以从任何位置阅读。在阳光不太强烈的情况下，也可以在户外阅读屏幕。

在户外的Inspiron。
在户外的Inspiron。

性能 - 戴尔电脑的CPU仍然低于其能力

戴尔的15.6英寸全能型产品为办公和互联网应用提供足够的性能，并允许使用电脑游戏。

测试条件

戴尔电源管理器提供影响笔记本温度和功率发展的配置文件。我们使用了 "优化 "配置文件。一些基准测试还在 "超性能 "配置文件中运行。

优化的 凉爽的 安静的 超强的性能
PL1 25瓦特 15瓦特 30瓦特
PL2 51瓦特 51瓦特 51瓦特 51瓦特
戴尔电源管理器
戴尔电源管理器

处理器

该 酷睿i7-11300H-四核处理器(Tiger Lake)以3.1 GHz的基础时钟工作。通过Turbo可以提高到4GHz（四个核心），最高4.4GHz（一个核心）。支持超线程（每个核心两个线程）。

Cinebench R15基准的多线程测试在3.3至4GHz下运行了很短的时间，然后时钟在600MHz和3GHz之间波动。单线程测试以1.6至4.4GHz运行。在电池模式下，时钟速率较低。

戴尔为CPU选择了相对较低的功率限制。因此，11300H仍然低于其能力，因为与Ideapad 5 Pro 16IH的基准结果相比 Ideapad 5 Pro 16IHU6显示。多线程测试中的差距明显大于单线程测试。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
HWInfo
HWInfo

我们通过循环运行Cinebench R15基准的多线程测试至少30分钟来检查CPU Turbo是否也在主电源运行中被永久使用。Turbo只在开始时使用，通常基础时钟被压低。超性能 "配置文件让CPU以更高的速度运行。

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test

0801602403204004805606407208008809601040112012001280136014401520Tooltip
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR Intel Core i5-11300H: Ø626 (588.39-777.54)
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR Intel Core i5-11300H; Ultra-Leistung: Ø744 (736.02-795.91)
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø725 (618.81-762.14)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; Variable PL1 : Ø928 (765.3-1048.55)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; Pl1 @ 25W: Ø792 (781.11-959.72)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; PL1 fixed @ 28W: Ø849 (836.45-917.33)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H: Ø954 (921.15-990.11)
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U: Ø1437 (1387.54-1534.27)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U: Ø1208 (1173.12-1266.74)
执行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速率
执行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速率
执行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速率（超性能
执行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速率（超性能
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
139 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
778 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
103.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
Cinebench R23
Single Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
1529 Points +12%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1495 Points +9%
Average of class Office
  (529 - 1995, n=121, last 2 years)
1462 Points +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
1431 Points +5%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H (Ultra-Leistung)
1378 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (1218 - 1431, n=11)
1373 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
1367 Points
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1264 Points -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
1149 Points -16%
Multi Core
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
9051 Points +84%
Average of class Office
  (1056 - 15743, n=122, last 2 years)
8116 Points +65%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
7221 Points +47%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
6465 Points +32%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5639 Points +15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5344 (4894.88min - 5344.23max) Points +9%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (3313 - 6581, n=10)
5564 Points +13%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4947 (4868.64min - 4947.48max) Points +1%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H (Ultra-Leistung)
4916 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
4914 Points
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
589 Points +12%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
575 Points +9%
Average of class Office
  (181.3 - 764, n=120, last 2 years)
562 Points +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
548 Points +4%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H (Ultra-Leistung)
528 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
526 Points
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (431 - 548, n=11)
522 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
490 Points -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
456 Points -13%
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
3536 Points +85%
Average of class Office
  (356 - 5904, n=120, last 2 years)
3121 Points +63%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
2758 Points +44%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
2382 Points +24%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
2152 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (1300 - 2533, n=10)
2146 Points +12%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
1914 Points
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1908 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H (Ultra-Leistung)
1903 Points -1%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
233 Points +68%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
231 Points +66%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
221 Points +59%
Average of class Office
  (82.6 - 284, n=118, last 2 years)
218 Points +57%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
188 Points +35%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
177 Points +27%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
176 Points +27%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (123 - 211, n=8)
173.4 Points +25%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
139 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1535 Points +97%
Average of class Office
  (160.8 - 2642, n=120, last 2 years)
1405 Points +81%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
1267 (1173.12min - 1266.74max) Points +63%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H (Variable PL1 )
1049 (765.3min - 1048.55max) Points +35%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H (Pl1 @ 25W)
960 (781.11min - 959.72max) Points +23%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H (PL1 fixed @ 28W)
917 (836.45min - 917.33max) Points +18%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
990 Points +27%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (632 - 990, n=11)
895 Points +15%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H (Ultra-Leistung)
796 Points +2%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
778 Points
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
762 (618.81min - 762.14max) Points -2%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
654 Seconds *
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H (Ultra-Leistung)
612 Seconds * +6%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
603 Seconds * +8%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (466 - 862, n=10)
572 Seconds * +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
542 Seconds * +17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
538 Seconds * +18%
Average of class Office
  (214 - 2844, n=121, last 2 years)
534 Seconds * +18%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
418 Seconds * +36%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
323 Seconds * +51%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5416 MIPS +10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5411 MIPS +10%
Average of class Office
  (2233 - 6687, n=121, last 2 years)
5026 MIPS +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
4947 MIPS 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
4937 MIPS
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H (Ultra-Leistung)
4930 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (4603 - 4969, n=10)
4872 MIPS -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
4588 MIPS -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
4323 MIPS -12%
7z b 4
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
42760 MIPS +108%
Average of class Office
  (4226 - 62349, n=121, last 2 years)
34839 MIPS +69%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
33768 MIPS +64%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
25382 MIPS +23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
25353 MIPS +23%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (17573 - 26001, n=10)
23562 MIPS +15%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
22655 MIPS +10%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H (Ultra-Leistung)
21257 MIPS +3%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
20562 MIPS
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
1574 Points +17%
Average of class Office
  (510 - 1974, n=122, last 2 years)
1480 Points +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
1447 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (1342 - 1462, n=10)
1410 Points +5%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H (Ultra-Leistung)
1343 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
1342 Points
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1191 Points -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
1116 Points -17%
Multi-Core
Average of class Office
  (1018 - 11980, n=122, last 2 years)
6683 Points +84%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
6254 Points +72%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
5367 Points +48%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5214 Points +44%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
4905 Points +35%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (3631 - 5499, n=10)
4642 Points +28%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H (Ultra-Leistung)
3793 Points +4%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
3631 Points
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
10.6 fps +87%
Average of class Office
  (1.55 - 17.4, n=120, last 2 years)
9.27 fps +63%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
8.24 fps +45%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
7.08 fps +25%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (4.32 - 8.38, n=10)
7.04 fps +24%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
6.91 fps +22%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.59 fps +16%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H (Ultra-Leistung)
6.14 fps +8%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
5.67 fps
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
67.3 s * -43%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
57.2 s * -22%
Average of class Office
  (31.3 - 117.5, n=120, last 2 years)
56.4 s * -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
52.4 s * -11%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (43.6 - 59.4, n=10)
49.9 s * -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
47.3 s * -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
47 s *
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
45.9 s * +2%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H (Ultra-Leistung)
45.1 s * +4%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
0.635 sec * -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H (Ultra-Leistung)
0.631 sec * -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H
0.627 sec *
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (0.6 - 0.644, n=10)
0.619 sec * +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
0.604 sec * +4%
Average of class Office
  (0.4244 - 1.397, n=119, last 2 years)
0.586 sec * +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
0.585 sec * +7%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.56 sec * +11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.552 sec * +12%

* ... smaller is better

系统性能

灵活而流畅的工作系统为所有常见的应用领域提供了足够的性能。基本上良好的PCMark结果有点落后于竞争对手。

由于工作内存在单通道模式下运行，部分性能仍 未使用。双通道模式可以通过安装第二个内存模块激活。

笔记本有两个工作存储器库。
笔记本有两个工作存储器库。
PCMark 10 Score
4899 points
Help
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
PCMark 10 / Score
HP Pavilion 15-eg
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
5814 Points +19%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
5625 Points +15%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
5402 Points +10%
Average of class Office
  (2325 - 7157, n=105, last 2 years)
5348 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5333 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
Vega 7, R5 5500U
5218 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (4899 - 5391, n=3)
5208 Points +6%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
4899 Points
PCMark 10 / Essentials
HP Pavilion 15-eg
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
9833 Points +18%
Average of class Office
  (5095 - 20841, n=105, last 2 years)
9832 Points +18%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
9270 Points +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
Vega 7, R5 5500U
9125 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8931 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (8366 - 8931, n=3)
8742 Points +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
8568 Points +2%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8366 Points
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
9662 Points +17%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
9292 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (8292 - 9188, n=3)
8678 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8554 Points +3%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8292 Points
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
8111 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
Vega 7, R5 5500U
7942 Points -4%
Average of class Office
  (3041 - 10198, n=105, last 2 years)
7449 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
5880 Points +28%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
5839 Points +27%
Average of class Office
  (1912 - 9056, n=105, last 2 years)
5810 Points +26%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
5691 Points +24%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5388 Points +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
Vega 7, R5 5500U
5320 Points +16%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (4600 - 5388, n=3)
5057 Points +10%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
4600 Points

DPC延迟

延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
5117 μs * -163%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
2084 μs * -7%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1945 μs *
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
Vega 7, R5 5500U
874 μs * +55%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
629 μs * +68%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
587 μs * +70%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

512GB NVMe固态硬盘（M.2-2230）的传输率很好，但它不是顶级固态硬盘之一。使用2280格式的固态硬盘需要重新定位安装支架。第二个第二个M.2插槽只能容纳2230格式的型号。

一个NVMe SSD作为系统驱动器。
一个NVMe SSD作为系统驱动器。
有空间容纳第二个NVMe SSD。
有空间容纳第二个NVMe SSD。
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2316 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1521 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 640 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 510 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1858 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1499 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 61.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 207.3 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe		HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB		Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G		Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ		Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00		Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
 		Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
 		Average of class Office
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-16%
-12%
27%
-5%
-21%
-23%
28%
Write 4K
207.3
141.6
-32%
136
-34%
203
-2%
116.8
-44%
82.7
-60%
126.4 ?(89.3 - 207, n=14)
-39%
158.7 ?(50.1 - 291, n=70, last 2 years)
-23%
Read 4K
61.3
42.61
-30%
60.4
-1%
52.3
-15%
43.92
-28%
39.96
-35%
50 ?(40.3 - 61.3, n=14)
-18%
61.7 ?(20.6 - 90.2, n=70, last 2 years)
1%
Write Seq
1499
1337
-11%
1447
-3%
2138
43%
1990
33%
1273
-15%
1207 ?(315 - 1552, n=13)
-19%
2427 ?(315 - 5030, n=53, last 2 years)
62%
Read Seq
1858
1575
-15%
1507
-19%
1974
6%
1959
5%
1601
-14%
1567 ?(1236 - 1858, n=13)
-16%
2611 ?(507 - 5559, n=53, last 2 years)
41%
Write 4K Q32T1
510
397.8
-22%
235.6
-54%
640
25%
373.3
-27%
360.4
-29%
347 ?(162.5 - 510, n=14)
-32%
400 ?(162.5 - 809, n=70, last 2 years)
-22%
Read 4K Q32T1
640
454.2
-29%
737
15%
707
10%
524
-18%
410.4
-36%
425 ?(331 - 640, n=14)
-34%
519 ?(184.2 - 899, n=70, last 2 years)
-19%
Write Seq Q32T1
1521
1648
8%
1529
1%
2973
95%
1985
31%
1589
4%
1224 ?(259 - 1521, n=14)
-20%
3062 ?(259 - 6207, n=70, last 2 years)
101%
Read Seq Q32T1
2316
2388
3%
2357
2%
3559
54%
2456
6%
2652
15%
2278 ?(1815 - 2375, n=14)
-2%
4260 ?(454 - 7123, n=70, last 2 years)
84%
AS SSD
35%
-7%
86%
43%
30%
-10%
53%
Seq Read
2086
2030
-3%
1972
-5%
2541
22%
2082
0%
2549
22%
1871 ?(1276 - 2086, n=14)
-10%
3168 ?(508 - 5796, n=103, last 2 years)
52%
Seq Write
1124
1003
-11%
981
-13%
2555
127%
1844
64%
1571
40%
810 ?(548 - 1124, n=14)
-28%
2085 ?(304 - 5880, n=103, last 2 years)
85%
4K Read
54.1
46.74
-14%
55.8
3%
56
4%
44.33
-18%
41.92
-23%
45.8 ?(33.3 - 54.6, n=14)
-15%
56.3 ?(18.7 - 91.1, n=103, last 2 years)
4%
4K Write
138.1
164.2
19%
133.5
-3%
129.6
-6%
157.5
14%
110.3
-20%
110.9 ?(70.4 - 141.7, n=14)
-20%
158.6 ?(35.4 - 350, n=103, last 2 years)
15%
4K-64 Read
1295
1098
-15%
1277
-1%
1633
26%
1039
-20%
1086
-16%
997 ?(662 - 1295, n=14)
-23%
1069 ?(182.3 - 2713, n=103, last 2 years)
-17%
4K-64 Write
750
891
19%
313.9
-58%
1863
148%
1556
107%
1083
44%
452 ?(132.3 - 750, n=14)
-40%
1482 ?(132.3 - 3394, n=103, last 2 years)
98%
Access Time Read *
0.141
0.053
62%
0.15
-6%
0.077
45%
0.05
65%
0.119
16%
0.1024 ?(0.058 - 0.169, n=14)
27%
0.08014 ?(0.022 - 0.295, n=103, last 2 years)
43%
Access Time Write *
0.169
0.062
63%
0.513
-204%
0.029
83%
0.065
62%
0.034
80%
0.4026 ?(0.168 - 0.718, n=14)
-138%
0.06444 ?(0.017 - 0.619, n=103, last 2 years)
62%
Score Read
1558
1348
-13%
1530
-2%
1944
25%
1292
-17%
1383
-11%
1232 ?(823 - 1558, n=14)
-21%
1442 ?(252 - 3364, n=103, last 2 years)
-7%
Score Write
1001
1155
15%
546
-45%
2248
125%
1898
90%
1351
35%
644 ?(335 - 1001, n=14)
-36%
1850 ?(320 - 4111, n=103, last 2 years)
85%
Score Total
3316
3149
-5%
2819
-15%
5192
57%
3845
16%
3398
2%
2461 ?(1685 - 3316, n=14)
-26%
3986 ?(704 - 9204, n=103, last 2 years)
20%
Copy ISO MB/s
678
1583
133%
1105
63%
2246
231%
1441
113%
1286
90%
1785 ?(339 - 11031, n=11)
163%
1677 ?(230 - 3489, n=89, last 2 years)
147%
Copy Program MB/s
364.8
682
87%
799
119%
861
136%
484.9
33%
574
57%
388 ?(201 - 645, n=11)
6%
515 ?(80.4 - 1049, n=89, last 2 years)
41%
Copy Game MB/s
557
1428
156%
957
72%
1552
179%
1098
97%
1133
103%
715 ?(142.7 - 1101, n=11)
28%
1186 ?(142.7 - 2780, n=89, last 2 years)
113%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
10% / 17%
-10% / -9%
57% / 64%
19% / 26%
5% / 11%
-17% / -14%
41% / 44%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

的。GeForce-MX450GPU（图灵）是Nvidia目前的中档型号。它由快速的GDDR5内存（2,048 MB）支持，通过64位线连接。3DMark的结果与我们迄今为止确定的MX450平均水平相当。超性能 "配置文件并不影响图形性能。

GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
极端野生动物
极端野生动物
3DMark 11 Performance
7524 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
55566 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
14683 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
4287 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
2030 points
Help
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
9580 Points +12%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H (Ultra-Leistung)
8565 Points +1%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
8517 Points
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
8204 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (6341 - 9580, n=16)
8129 Points -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-11370H
7983 Points -6%
Average of class Office
  (1474 - 13132, n=113, last 2 years)
6062 Points -29%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
5667 Points -33%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
5257 Points -38%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
5573 Points +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (4336 - 5753, n=17)
4869 Points +2%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
4766 Points
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
4753 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H (Ultra-Leistung)
4725 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-11370H
4435 Points -7%
Average of class Office
  (712 - 9228, n=114, last 2 years)
4191 Points -12%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
3430 Points -28%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
3395 Points -29%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
33806 Points +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (25467 - 33806, n=13)
29167 Points +6%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H (Ultra-Leistung)
27546 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
27532 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
27524 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-11370H
25467 Points -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
24916 Points -9%
Average of class Office
  (5681 - 58068, n=93, last 2 years)
24010 Points -13%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
2300 Points +21%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H (Ultra-Leistung)
1980 Points +4%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1945 Points +3%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
1896 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (1086 - 2300, n=16)
1796 Points -5%
Average of class Office
  (242 - 3242, n=110, last 2 years)
1372 Points -28%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
1057 Points -44%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1040 Points -45%

游戏性能

我们数据库中的大多数游戏在低分辨率和低到中等质量水平下都能达到可玩的帧率。对硬件要求适中的标题允许更多。帧率略低于MX450的平均水平。 Inspiron无法跟上联想Ideapad 5 Pro 16IHU6的优秀速率 。

The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | GTA V | Strange Brigade
The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
81.4 (34.1min, 42.6P0.1, 59.5P1 - 198max) fps +41%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
69.7 (67min - 77max) fps +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (34 - 81.4, n=14)
61.6 fps +7%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
59.9 (30.6min, 32.9P0.1, 40.4P1 - 211max) fps +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
58 fps 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
57.8 (27.2min, 33.7P0.1, 39.8P1 - 118max) fps
Average of class Office
  (7.82 - 106.3, n=96, last 2 years)
46.3 fps -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
41.1 fps -29%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
38.5 (24.8min, 25.3P0.1, 26.8P1 - 66max) fps -33%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
95.5 (80.2min) fps +27%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
87.7 (75.1min) fps +16%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
82.1 (68.9min) fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (34.9 - 104.6, n=20)
79.9 fps +6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
79.4 (72.2min) fps +5%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (Ultra-Leistung)
77.7 (67.6min) fps +3%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
75.3 (66.7min) fps
Average of class Office
  (7.8 - 121.2, n=123, last 2 years)
46.3 fps -39%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
45.6 (41min) fps -39%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
45.5 (42min) fps -40%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
66 fps +40%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
62.6 fps +33%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
57.7 fps +23%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
57.4 fps +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (35.4 - 71.4, n=20)
54.9 fps +17%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
47 fps
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (Ultra-Leistung)
45.1 fps -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
29.5 fps -37%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
28.9 fps -39%
Average of class Office
  (5.55 - 92.6, n=123, last 2 years)
28.2 fps -40%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1280x720 Lite Quality
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.3)
65.3 fps +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (27.6 - 72.2, n=16)
57.3 fps +6%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.3)
56.2 fps +4%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.3, Ultra-Leistung)
55.7 fps +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.3)
55.1 fps +2%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.3)
54.1 fps
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.3)
51.5 fps -5%
Average of class Office
  (5.42 - 103.1, n=115, last 2 years)
36.4 fps -33%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1.3)
33.5 fps -38%
GTA V - 1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
68.3 (24.7min, 45.5P1 - 145max) fps +32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (30.6 - 68.3, n=11)
54.1 fps +4%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (Ultra-Leistung)
52.2 (14.6min, 35.7P1 - 116max) fps +1%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
51.8 (14.5min, 34.5P1 - 119max) fps
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
51.7 (15.6min, 35.7P1 - 117max) fps 0%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
51.5 (14.9min, 37P1 - 117max) fps -1%
Average of class Office
  (8.21 - 99.1, n=101, last 2 years)
25.9 fps -50%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
25.4 (4.58min, 18.2P1 - 33.1max) fps -51%
Strange Brigade - 1280x720 lowest AF:1
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
134 (96.7min, 110P1 - 199max) fps +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (61.4 - 137.7, n=12)
117 fps +10%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
106 (78.7min, 88.7P1 - 150max) fps 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
106 (79.5min, 82.5P1 - 156max) fps
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Ultra-Leistung)
106 (53.1min, 84.4P1 - 199max) fps 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
104 (49.4min, 60.8P1 - 309max) fps -2%
Average of class Office
  (16.3 - 175.7, n=109, last 2 years)
81 fps -24%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
72.3 (43min, 47.8P1 - 131max) fps -32%

为了检查帧率是否在较长时间内基本保持不变，我们在全高清分辨率和最高质量设置下运行游戏"TheWitcher 3" 约60分钟。游戏角色没有移动。在不到两分钟后，GPU时钟略微降低，但这并不影响帧率。

Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram

121722Tooltip
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe: Ø20.8 (19-23)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G: Ø19.9 (18-22)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø26 (25-27)
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00: Ø13.4 (12-15)
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB: Ø23 (20-25)
Witcher 3 测试期间的GPU读数
Witcher 3 测试期间的GPU读数
low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 115 95.8 51.8 23.8
The Witcher 3 (2015) 99.3 57.8 30.7 17.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 104 90.5 80.7 75.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 54.1 25.3 13.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 68.8 53.7 47
Strange Brigade (2018) 106 40.6 35.4 25
Control (2019) 74.8 24.7 15.7
Flight Simulator 2020 (2020) 61 22.7 14.8 7.86
Deathloop (2021) 27.7 13.5 11
Alan Wake Remastered (2021) 25.5 16.2 13.4
Back 4 Blood (2021) 128.3 46.9 29.4 26.7
Riders Republic (2021) 62 28 23 20
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) 72 28 23 13
Halo Infinite (2021) 8.6
God of War (2022) 25.8 18.4 8.66 3.09
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022) 54 28 26 16
Dying Light 2 (2022) 22 16.7 11.8
GRID Legends (2022) 67.7 45.8 39.7 24.9
Elden Ring (2022) 31 19 17.2 15.1
Elex 2 (2022) 23.1 10.7 6.62
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) 38.2 25.8 25.8 24.9
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) 37.2 22.7 14 10.5
Vampire Bloodhunt (2022) 96.5 59.3 50.7 33.4
F1 22 (2022) 54.7 49.2 36 22.2
The Quarry (2022) 30 21.1 14.9 9.31
FIFA 23 (2022) 57.4 42.1 37.8 33.9
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022) 22.6 18.3 12.4 8.51
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022) 9.73 8.41 5.83 5.51
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) 37 33 15 17
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) 22.9 21 17.6 11.2
The Callisto Protocol (2022) 34.2 15 8 7.4
Need for Speed Unbound (2022) 28.7 21.4 13.5
High On Life (2023) 29.4 15.8 14 12.4
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) 45.8 32.4 24.9 14.1

Emissions & energy - Dell laptop with good battery runtimes

噪声排放

在日常使用中（办公室、互联网），笔记本几乎不产生任何噪音--风扇经常静止不动。在较重的负载下，达到的声压级要比装备相当的笔记本，如RedmiBook Pro 15 和Ideapad 5 Pro 16IHU6 。通过使用 "静音 "配置，可以实现较低的噪音水平--以牺牲计算性能为代价。

Noise Level

Idle
26 / 26 / 26 dB(A)
Load
47.4 / 48.4 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202627.528.427.826.928.226252526.730.133.83032.2253128.830.131.628.231.731.928.84023.928.225.925.327.427.823.95033.635.53736.637.228.633.663212220.921.722.924218015.918.525.918.218.322.615.910016.322.219.620.322.418.316.312517.52018.520.421.118.417.516018.221.421.821.421.816.918.220016.620.619.12020.71616.625015.320.419.819.62014.215.331514.822.620.922.422.713.714.840013.428.724.627.129.71313.450013.128.226.827.929.812.513.1630133128.430.431.912.41380013.230.32728.530.812.613.2100013.333.430.132.134.412.413.3125013.133.430.432.734.112.713.1160013.734.6313335.212.913.7200013.436.132.734.636.813.713.4250013.835.631.734.236.213.713.8315014.735.731.633.736.11414.7400014.235.431.23335.114.114.2500014.436.532.334.536.414.414.4630014.538.73536.939.114.514.5800015.341.836.84041.715.115.31000015.938.130.234.138.21515.91250015.235.627.931.835.71515.21600013.927.120.523.626.913.513.9SPL26.24843.946.248.325.926.2N0.85.94.45.26.10.70.8median 14.4median 33.4median 28.4median 31.8median 34.1median 14median 14.4Delta1.36.15.25.45.41.11.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseDell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450		HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450		Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450		Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450		Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)		Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Noise
7%
4%
8%
0%
6%
off / environment *
26
25.4
2%
25
4%
25
4%
26
-0%
26
-0%
Idle Minimum *
26
25.6
2%
25
4%
25
4%
26
-0%
26
-0%
Idle Average *
26
25.6
2%
26
-0%
25
4%
26
-0%
26
-0%
Idle Maximum *
26
25.6
2%
27
-4%
25
4%
28.8
-11%
26
-0%
Load Average *
47.4
39.2
17%
43
9%
44.5
6%
45
5%
42.6
10%
Load Maximum *
48.4
41.5
14%
44
9%
36.5
25%
45
7%
37.4
23%
Witcher 3 ultra *
39.1
42

* ... smaller is better

温度

压力测试中的Inspiron。
压力测试中的Inspiron。

在日常使用中（办公室、互联网），机箱温度处于绿色区域内。在硬件满负荷的情况下，散热器的区域会达到超过50或60℃（122或140°F）的数值。竞争者通常不那么有选择地发热。但总的来说，他们的发热程度更高。

CPU和GPU以相对较高的速度开始进行压力测试（Prime95和FurMark至少运行一个小时）。超过这个时期，速率下降到400 MHz至1.4 GHz或大约1050 MHz。压力测试代表了一种极端情况。我们用这个测试来检查系统是否在全负荷下稳定运行。

Max. Load
 50.7 °C55.1 °C39 °C 
 37.8 °C39.1 °C28.5 °C 
 28.3 °C26.8 °C25.5 °C 
Maximum: 55.1 °C
Average: 36.8 °C
37.6 °C62.4 °C44.2 °C
27 °C33.3 °C34.4 °C
25.1 °C25.8 °C26.5 °C
Maximum: 62.4 °C
Average: 35.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  55.8 °C | Room Temperature 23.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55.1 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 62.4 °C / 144 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.3 °C / 82.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-0.6 °C / -1 F).
发热的顶面(负载)
发热的顶面(负载)
发热的顶部（空闲状态
发热的顶部（空闲状态
发热底面(负载)
发热底面(负载)
底部发热（怠速）
底部发热（怠速）
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450		HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450		Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450		Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450		Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)		Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Heat
13%
6%
6%
16%
20%
Maximum Upper Side *
55.1
44
20%
54
2%
65.3
-19%
46.1
16%
40.5
26%
Maximum Bottom *
62.4
53.4
14%
52
17%
55.4
11%
46.6
25%
42
33%
Idle Upper Side *
29.8
27.4
8%
33
-11%
25.4
15%
27.4
8%
26.5
11%
Idle Bottom *
32.5
28.8
11%
28
14%
26.8
18%
28.2
13%
29
11%

* ... smaller is better

演讲者

立体声扬声器产生了一个体面的声音，其中几乎没有任何低音。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.928.227.92528.532.228.53132.231.932.2402727.8275034.228.634.26325.92425.98038.322.638.310044.418.344.412546.718.446.716046.316.946.320046.81646.825054.814.254.831557.413.757.440061.11361.150064.812.564.863065.512.465.580072.612.672.6100070.912.470.9125070.712.770.7160070.512.970.5200072.213.772.2250072.813.772.8315071.11471.140007414.174500070.214.470.2630073.814.573.8800083.915.183.91000086.41586.41250088.41588.41600082.313.582.3SPL89.925.989.9N69.40.769.4median 70.7median 14median 70.7Delta61.1636.739.736.731.331.431.331.127.831.124.322.324.327.224.827.23331.13331.428.331.428.225.428.233.522.733.547.719.647.756.120.656.163.71963.766.220.266.267.119.367.168.715.168.772.415.272.472.313.172.368.512.268.571.311.771.368.911.768.970.611.870.667.31267.367.711.767.767.111.767.170.413.870.469.91269.967.71267.766.812.866.862.413.762.45913.85981.325.681.354.70.754.7median 67.3median 13.7median 67.353.35hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JRHP Pavilion 15-eg
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Pavilion 15-eg audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

消耗功率

在空闲和低负载的情况下，戴尔电脑的能耗与Ideapad 5 Pro和RedmiBook Pro的数值基本持平。Ideapad 5 Pro和红米书Pro 15.在高负荷下，它的能耗要低得多。一方面，CPU的低功率限制在这里很明显，另一方面，戴尔只包括一个65瓦的电源（联想：95瓦，小米：100瓦）。因此，Inspiron在计算能力方面无法跟上竞争对手的步伐。

在压力测试和测试期间，CPU和GPU的功耗图很好地描述了它们的行为。 Witcher 3 测试很好地描述了它们的行为。在测试过程中，时钟速率下降。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 0.44 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4 / 7.6 / 10.2 Watt
Load midlight 49.4 / 63.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR i5-11300H, GeForce MX450; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø49.4 (46.2-64.2)
HP Pavilion 15-eg i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø55.6 (54.5-61.3)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 i5-11300H, GeForce MX450; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø72.4 (69.7-85.3)
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA R7 5700U, Vega 8; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø43 (41.3-47.3)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 R5 5500U, Vega 7; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø41 (39.4-44.3)
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR i5-11300H, GeForce MX450; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø63.4 (56.6-67)
HP Pavilion 15-eg i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø65.1 (63.7-65.9)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 i5-11300H, GeForce MX450; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø100.7 (94.5-105)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 R5 5500U, Vega 7; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø43.4 (41.8-53.2)
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450		HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450		Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450		Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450		Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)		Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Power Consumption
-19%
-37%
-30%
-3%
11%
Idle Minimum *
4
4.9
-23%
6
-50%
5
-25%
5
-25%
3.7
7%
Idle Average *
7.6
7.9
-4%
9
-18%
9
-18%
7.7
-1%
7.9
-4%
Idle Maximum *
10.2
14.2
-39%
12
-18%
9.4
8%
12.2
-20%
9.3
9%
Load Average *
49.4
64.3
-30%
74
-50%
71
-44%
41
17%
41
17%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49.4
55.6
-13%
70.7
-43%
72.4
-47%
43
13%
41
17%
Load Maximum *
63.4
65.4
-3%
91
-44%
99
-56%
65
-3%
52.2
18%

* ... smaller is better

电池寿命

在我们的实际WLAN测试中，Inspiron 5518的运行时间达到了9:24小时。网页加载期间的负载是通过一个脚本来映射的。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 92)
9h 24min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05
R5 5500U, Vega 7, 70 Wh
839 min +49%
Average of class Office
  (300 - 1137, n=107, last 2 years)
594 min +5%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450, 54 Wh
564 min
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450, 75 Wh
543 min -4%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
R7 5700U, Vega 8, 50 Wh
538 min -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
i7-11370H, GeForce MX450, 70 Wh
493 min -13%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, 41 Wh
396 min -30%

Pros

+ 哑光IPS屏幕
+ 别致的铝制外壳
+ NVMe-SSD
+ 可容纳第二个NVMe SSD（M.2-2230）的空间
+ 按键照明
+ USB 3.2 Gen 2x2
+ 通过USB-C的显示端口
+ 电源传输
+ 良好的电池运行时间

Cons

- 外壳应该更加坚硬/稳定
- 色彩空间覆盖率低
- 黑屏
- 低于平均水平的CPU性能
- 存储卡读卡器速度慢
- 工作存储器在单通道模式下运行
- 只有一年的保修期

结论 - Inspiron 15 5518有改进的潜力

戴尔Inspiron 15 5518（2X3JR），由。
戴尔Inspiron 15 5518（2X3JR），由。

安装的 酷睿i5-11300HCPU为办公和互联网应用提供了足够的性能。 GeForce-MX450图形核心允许使用计算机游戏或GPU重的应用程序。这些硬件被安置在一个别致的铝制外壳中。

Thunderbolt 4是为Inspiron的Core i7型号保留的。

近9.5小时的WLAN运行时间应该可以让你在没有电源适配器的情况下度过一天。可以通过附带的戴尔专有电源适配器或USB-C电源适配器进行充电--5518的USB-C端口根据USB 3.2 Gen 2x2标准工作。

笔记本电脑在日常使用中（办公室、互联网）不会产生太多的噪音，热量的发展也处于可接受的水平。哑光屏幕（FHD，IPS）提供稳定的可视角度，良好的对比度和体面的色彩再现。亮度和色彩空间覆盖率太低。

由于功率限制较低，处理器没有达到其能力。在单通道模式下运行的工作内存（1x 8 GB，DDR4-3200）进一步降低了性能。这可以通过安装第二个内存模块来改善。铝制外壳缺乏硬度。

在800欧元（约939美元）的细分市场中，Inspiron的一个替代品是联想IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 。它的优点是多线程CPU性能高，屏幕明亮，排放低，以及电池运行时间长。缺点是。工作存储器是焊接的，屏幕的对比度很低。

价格和可用性

戴尔的Inspiron 15 5518（Core i5-11300H,GeForce MX450, 8 GB RAM, 512 GB SSD）目前在Cyberport.de有售。以不到800欧元（约合939美元）的价格出售。

Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR - 09/14/2021 v7
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
76 / 98 → 77%
Keyboard
82%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
62 / 80 → 78%
Weight
65 / 20-75 → 83%
Battery
87%
Display
84%
Games Performance
71 / 78 → 91%
Application Performance
87 / 95 → 92%
Temperature
85%
Noise
81%
Audio
79%
Camera
37 / 85 → 44%
Average
76%
82%
Office - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 戴尔Inspiron 15 5518笔记本电脑在审查。CPU的速度变慢了
Sascha Mölck, 2021-09-19 (Update: 2021-09-19)