Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy S24 评测--最好的小型Android 智能手机越来越便宜,但并非更好

又是 Exynos 的问题? 在我们的评测中,三星Galaxy S24 外形小巧,易于操作,而且比Galaxy S23 更便宜。不过,由于采用了 Exynos 2400 处理器,这款Galaxy 手机在效率和游戏方面还有待提高。请继续阅读,了解我们认为Galaxy S24 还能在哪些方面有所改进。更新:我们仍在关注相机领域的 "香蕉门"。
5G Galaxy S Smartphone Touchscreen
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测

作为 2024 年 1 月 Unpacked 活动的一部分,三星展示了两款新的顶级智能手机,即 Galaxy S24和Galaxy S24+,为其 旗舰Galaxy S 系列的旗舰产品。这两款三星智能手机的共同点是都采用了自制芯片组,而且不同于 前一年不同的是,只有 超机型采用高通 骁龙 8 代 3Galaxy.在高端机型上,三星(至少在欧洲)采用了 Exynos 2400从纸面上看,它也能带来强大的性能。

6.2 英寸的三星Galaxy S24 的基本配置为 128 GB 内置内存,起始零售价为 799 美元,比上一代产品便宜 50 美元。与前代产品相比,后者在硬件上没有太大的差异,这也许是合理的。 Galaxy S23.相比之下,2024 型号的重点则在另一个领域:软件--尤其是Galaxy AI 和可持续性。

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Galaxy S24 Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 2400 10 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A520
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.20 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 416 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 231 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, barometer, OTG, Miracast, Dual eSIM
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, GSM: 850 MHz, GSM 900 MHz, 1.800 MHz, 1.900 MHz; UMTS: B1 (2.100), B2 (1.900), B4 (AWS), B5 (850), B8 (900); LTE - FDD: B1 (2.100), B2 (1.900), B3 (1.800), B4 (AWS), B5 (850), B7 (2.600), B8 (900), B12 (700), B13 (700), B17 (700), B18 (800), B19 (800), B20 (800), B25 (1.900), B26 (850), B28 (700), B32 (1.500), B66 (AWS-3), TDD: B38 (2.600), B39 (1.900), B40 (2.300), B41 (2.500); 5G: N1 (2.100), N2 (1.900), N3 (1.800), N5 (850), N7 (2.600), N8 (900), N12 (700), N20 (800), N25 (1.900), N26 (850), N28 (700), N66 (AWS-3), N38 (2.600), N40(2300), N41 (2.500), N77 (3.700), N78 (3.500), N75 (1.500), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.6 x 147 x 70.6
Battery
4000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 25W (USB), 15W (Qi), 4.5W (reverse charging charging)
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/​1.8, OIS, Videos: @4320p/​30fps) + 12 MPix (f/​2.2, wide angle lens) + 10 MPix (f/​2.4, telephoto lens, OIS, 3x opitical), Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/​2.2, AF, Videos @2160p/​60fps)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB cable, info material, SIM-Tool, One UI 6.1, 24 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS, Glonass, Beidou, Galileo; SAR: 0.869W/​kg Head, 1.35W/​kg Body, DRM widevine L1, fanless, waterproof
Weight
167 g
Price
899 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
90 %
03/2024
Samsung Galaxy S24
Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940
167 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.20"2340x1080
90.5 %
03/2023
Samsung Galaxy S23
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740
167 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2340x1080
89.8 %
01/2024
Xiaomi 14
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
193 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.36"2670x1200
89.1 %
10/2023
Apple iPhone 15
A16, A16 GPU 5-Core
171 g128 GB NVMe6.10"2556x1179
88.9 %
11/2023
Google Pixel 8
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7
187 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.20"2400x1080
Galaxy S24(右)的外观与前代产品相似。
Galaxy S24(右)的外观与前代产品相似。

Galaxy S24 的重量为 167 克,机身宽度为 70.6 毫米,是一款轻巧的智能手机。在设计语言方面,三星坚持了自己的风格,因此从视觉角度来看,Galaxy 与前代产品相比几乎没有变化。 前代产品.只是边框不再是圆形的,现在看起来更方正一些。6.2 英寸的三星Galaxy S24 的外部尺寸几乎完全相同,但仍然增长了约 0.1 英寸。屏占比为 90.9%,这使得屏占比更高。显示屏和机身背面均采用康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 保护。

三星Galaxy S24 的色彩选择
三星Galaxy S24 的色彩选择

根据制造商提供的信息,S24 的潜在购买者可以选择大量灵感来自地球矿物的颜色。除了玛瑙黑、大理石灰、钴紫和琥珀黄之外,Galaxy ,三星商店还独家提供翡翠绿、砂岩橙和宝石蓝。由于采用了磨砂表面,Galaxy S24 似乎不易沾染指纹,但也能看到淡淡的油渍条纹。

做工质量非常出色,缝隙尺寸紧密齐平。机箱后部与侧面铠装铝框之间的过渡天衣无缝,手感极佳。同样,Galaxy S24 也通过了 IP68 认证,这意味着在水中清洁设备或在雨中使用都不会有任何问题。

三星Galaxy S24(玛瑙黑
三星Galaxy S24(玛瑙黑
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测

尺寸比较

152.8 mm 71.5 mm 8.2 mm 193 g150.5 mm 70.8 mm 8.9 mm 187 g147.6 mm 71.6 mm 7.8 mm 171 g147 mm 70.6 mm 7.6 mm 167 g146.3 mm 70.9 mm 7.6 mm 167 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 -Galaxy S24 配备 UFS 存储设备

总之,Galaxy S24 提供了非常好的功能集,但三星智能手机并没有提供所有功能。例如,它缺少超宽带芯片,而如果有了超宽带芯片,Galaxy S24 系列中最小的手机就可以使用数字键盘了。该设备还缺少最新的蓝牙版本(5.4),这意味着该手机仍在使用其上一代产品所使用的 5.3 标准。 3 标准。与采用高通芯片组的Galaxy S24 Ultra 机型相比,搭载 Exynos 2400 处理器的 S24 机型也没有搭载跨平台的 "骁龙无缝 "功能,不过据说将来可以实现Android 和 Windows 等不同操作系统之间的无线连接。

与前代产品类似,该产品只有 128 GB 和 256 GB 两种存储容量可供选择。512 GB 的选择仍然没有。较小的版本仍然使用较慢的 UFS 3.1 标准,因为我们的 256 GB 评测版本中使用的 UFS 4.0 并不支持如此小的容量。就像音频插孔一样,你将不得不放弃可选的内存扩展功能。

相比之下,USB 端口几乎没有任何妥协,因为根据规格,它使用的是 USB 3.2(Gen.1)。此外,它还支持 USB OTG 和有线图像输出。在我们使用连接的 M2.SSD 硬盘(三星 980 Pro)进行的拷贝测试中,(通常)快速 USB 端口的传输速度仅为 188 MB/s,相当缓慢。三星智能手机在处理 exFAT 文件系统时没有问题,不过,NTFS 格式的存储设备只能读取而不能写入。

顶部箱体侧面(麦克风)
顶部箱体侧面(麦克风)
机壳右侧(按钮:音量、开关)
机壳右侧(按钮:音量、开关)
箱体左侧
箱体左侧
机箱底部侧面(扬声器、USB、麦克风、卡槽)
机箱底部侧面(扬声器、USB、麦克风、卡槽)

软件 - 长时间更新的三星智能手机

其中一个亮点是三星公司为其Galaxy S 系列产品提供的长期更新保证。随着Galaxy S24 的推出,这家韩国制造商走得更远,不仅为其顶级智能手机提供了七年的安全更新,而且还提供了七代Android 。此外,据说每月都会推出安全更新,但制造商没有说明会持续多久。

在测试时,操作系统基于当前的Android 14,安全补丁级别为 2024 年 2 月。在此基础上,制造商还提供了 6.1 版本的内部 One UI。

三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测

除了锁屏和 "始终开启 "显示屏的变化外,One UI 6.1 还是新的 "Galaxy AI "的简称。这意味着三星正在实现一些功能,这些功能本应通过人工智能来智能完成工作,但许多功能(如实时翻译或写作助手)需要连接互联网才能达到最佳效果。利用 "Circle to Search "功能,可以借助谷歌算法从显示屏上搜索对象,但这需要连接网络。

三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy S24 和 Wi-Fi 6E

5G 标准支持三星顶级联盟中的许多频率,尽管在欧洲不支持毫米波。4G 网络频谱也非常宽广,可接入众多与德语相关的 LTE 频段。Galaxy 手机也完全可以满足海外旅行的需求。

由于安装了 Exynos 2400 无法连接到 WiFi 7 网络,因此Galaxy S24 只支持 WiFi 6E。有趣的是,三星还决定在搭载了 骁龙 8 代 3在欧洲以外地区销售。

不过,有了 WiFi 6E,在 6 GHz 范围内实现高速传输是有可能的,但在使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器时,Galaxy S24 的传输速度要明显慢于 前代产品.一方面,这是因为我们无法将Galaxy S24 连接到 6 GHz Wi-Fi。另一方面,在使用 5 GHz 连接的情况下,我们测得的传输速度仅为 700 到 900 MBit/s,这表明 VHT160 信道未被集成。传输速度基本稳定。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy S24
iperf3 receive AXE11000
774 (min: 699) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
913 (min: 688) MBit/s ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy S23
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1659 (min: 1603) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1749 (min: 1253) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1799 (min: 1744) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1590 (min: 1562) MBit/s ∼92%
Xiaomi 14
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1623 (min: 1502) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1716 (min: 1119) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1738 (min: 1597) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1737 (min: 873) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 15
iperf3 receive AXE11000
691 (min: 617) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
773 (min: 576) MBit/s ∼44%
Google Pixel 8
iperf3 receive AXE11000
891 (min: 440) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
867 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1570 (min: 1043) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1521 (min: 1325) MBit/s ∼88%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
657 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
694 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1536 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1364 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼79%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1799 (1744-1867)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1589 (1562-1612)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Samsung Xclipse 940; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø772 (699-820)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1658 (1603-1686)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Samsung Xclipse 940; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø913 (688-994)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1750 (1253-1880)
户外定位
户外定位
室内定位
室内定位

在定位方面,Galaxy S24 依赖于主要的卫星系统,其中大部分是双频系统。我们能够将 "GPS 测试 "和 "GPSTest "应用程序连接到北斗(B1(C)、B2a)、GPS(L1、L5)、伽利略(E1、E5a)和格罗纳斯系统(L1),即使在室内也能获得很高的精度。

在我们的实际测试中,位置确定并非总是完美无缺,但仍然非常出色。虽然与计划路线有明显的小偏差,但我们用于对比的 Garmin Venu 2 有时记录的路线会更不准确。

Galaxy S24 与 Garmin Venu 2
Galaxy S24 与 Garmin Venu 2

电话功能和语音质量 - 三星手机提供实时翻译功能

三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测

Galaxy S24 支持两张 nano SIM 卡,包括两个插槽的 5G 使用以及 VoLTE 或 Wi-Fi 通话标准。与 不同的是eSIM 功能。

语音质量非常自然,声音还原清晰。我们的同行也认为三星手机的语音清晰易懂。我们的通话体验没有轻微的背景噪音。

在通话过程中,全新的Galaxy AI 也在发挥作用。通过 "实时翻译 "功能,Galaxy S24 可以实时翻译通过三星电话应用程序拨打的电话,而且无需数据连接即可直接在Galaxy 智能手机上完成。不过,"实时 "是一个非常灵活的术语,因为有时需要一两秒才能翻译出简短的语言内容。特别是在去掉原声时,会出现(仍然)长时间的停顿。总的来说,实时翻译是一项非常有趣的日常功能,尤其是非常有用。

三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测

摄像头 - 三星Galaxy S24 没有大的变化

与Galaxy S24 自拍
与Galaxy S24 自拍

Galaxy S23 的 "成熟 "摄像头系统在 2024 型号上几乎没有任何变化。前置摄像头具有自动对焦功能,分辨率为 1200 万像素,可进行多种设置和滤镜,并能以高达每秒 60 帧的速度录制超高清视频。f/2.2 镜头在日光下可提供曝光均衡、清晰度良好的自拍照。

0.6x
0.6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
3x
3x
10x
10x
20x
20x
30 倍(最大值)
30 倍(最大值)
0.6x
0.6x
1x
1x
3x
3x
10x
10x
20x
20x
30 倍(最大值)
30 倍(最大值)

Galaxy S24 的主摄像头采用了久经考验、值得信赖的三星 ISOCELL GN3。 前代前代而不是传闻中的新型ISOCELL GNK.1/1.57 英寸的摄像头传感器可拍摄 1250 万像素的照片,标准配置为 4 合 1 像素分档,并提供光学防抖功能。此外,在专业模式下,用户还可以选择 50 万像素和新的 24 万像素照片。

使用 5000 万像素镜头拍摄的照片具有漂亮的动态效果和自然的色彩平衡,令人印象深刻。此外,图像还显得有些锐化过度。在弱光条件下,图案轮廓会变得柔和,但光线非常迷人,我们也被弱光照片的曝光质量和细节水平所吸引,尤其是在这个价位的产品中。

三星Galaxy S24 三星Galaxy S24 Ultra
三星Galaxy S24
三星Galaxy S24 Ultra
三星Galaxy S24
三星Galaxy S24
三星Galaxy S24 Ultra
三星Galaxy S24 Ultra
三星Galaxy S24
三星Galaxy S24 Ultra

超广角镜头提供了不错的照片质量,但Galaxy S24 拍摄的照片还是有一两处瑕疵。在图像中心之外,1200 万像素的镜头也会出现明显的模糊,并伴有图像噪点。

我们对该组中的第三支镜头比较满意。该镜头具有 3 倍无损放大和光学防抖功能。在光线良好的情况下,变焦照片的清晰度最高可达 10 倍,但超过 3 倍后,由于数字放大,细节很快就会丢失。最大变焦为 30 倍,但只能看到轮廓。在弱光环境下,1000 万像素镜头及其 f/2.4 光圈显得非常嘈杂。

三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测

在视频方面,这款顶级三星手机的 OIS 提供了良好的防抖功能。移动图像可以全高清(最高 120fps)和超高清画质(最高 60fps)拍摄,如果需要,还可以以每秒 30 帧的速度拍摄 8K。此外,许多设置还可以通过相机软件("视频配置文件")进行手动设置,还可以选择 21:9 的图像格式。

三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测

Galaxy 人工智能的新 ProVisual 引擎将在相机和照片处理领域发挥作用。在编辑图片时,生成式人工智能可以在照片中创建新的内容。它可以实时工作,但往往不够 "智能",因此,它目前更像是一个测试版。目前, 人工智能既不实用,也不适合与图像处理有关的日常任务。Galaxy

三星Galaxy S24
三星Galaxy S24
三星Galaxy S24 Plus
三星Galaxy S24 Plus
Galaxy S24+
Galaxy S24+
Galaxy S24
Galaxy S24

2024 年 3 月 4 日更新

在Galaxy S23 系列的一些设备出现部分香蕉状模糊现象,以及论坛上的用户抱怨 2024 型号出现此问题之后,我们查看了两张Galaxy S24 的评测样本。这些图像是在光线非常好的条件下以 ISO 25 标准拍摄的,以查看是否有任何区域出现特别失焦的情况。

Galaxy S24 和Galaxy S24+ 在拍摄的文字中都没有明显的模糊问题。虽然 Plus 型号的清晰度相当均匀,但在Galaxy S24 的右侧图像区域可以看到一小点模糊。不过,这与我们Galaxy S23+ 测试照片中的模糊模式无法相比。

因此,我们无法根据我们的两款评测设备确认前代产品的 "香蕉门"。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

在可控照明条件下进行的测量中,Galaxy S24 的色彩再现效果非常出色。特别是绿色区域的显示比参考色更亮,但尽管如此,DeltaE 偏差总体上仍处于较低水平。

在全尺寸下,测试图中的细节显得非常清晰,色彩渐变的再现也非常干净。5000 万像素的传感器只能显示出一些模糊的边缘,而电路板的细腻纹理则会丢失。

ColorChecker
9.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
0.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
0.7 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S24: 5.04 ∆E min: 0.7 - max: 11.3 ∆E
ColorChecker
16.4 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
32.3 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
19 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S24: 20.15 ∆E min: 9.62 - max: 32.31 ∆E

配件和保修 -Galaxy 智能手机不带充电器

可选Galaxy S24 机箱
可选Galaxy S24 机箱

据三星称,Galaxy S24 采用 100% 的再生纸和纸板包装。不过,包装盒里的配件并不多,只有一根 USB-C 数据线、一个 SIM 卡工具和一本信息手册。可选的 25 瓦充电器可在三星商店购买(建议零售价:20 美元)。同样还有各种配套保护套。

在德国,三星为其手机提供 24 个月的 保修并为每一位Galaxy S24 购买者提供Care+保险套餐。这为Galaxy S24 提供长达两年的防损坏和防盗保险。根据所选套餐的不同,价格从 79 欧元到 229 欧元不等(分别约合 75 美元和 200 美元)。损坏和盗窃索赔的自负额分别为 59 欧元和 99 欧元(分别约合 55 美元和 95 美元)。

输入设备和操作 -Galaxy S24 具有面部解锁功能

6.2 英寸 OLED 显示屏配有出厂安装的屏幕保护膜,可准确执行屏幕上的输入。LTPO 面板的采样率为 240 Hz,响应速度快,触摸灵敏度高。在日常使用中,Galaxy S24 感觉非常灵敏,几乎不会出现卡顿现象。只有在谷歌发现中使用轻扫手势时才会出现轻微的卡顿,这与 Galaxy S24 Ultra.

电源键可以应用自定义功能,而且开箱后,只要手指在电源键上停留足够长的时间,该键就会成为 Bixby 语音助手的主页。按两次电源键可打开相机或首选应用。虽然没有集成 S-Pen 功能,但振动电机的工作非常精确,在日常使用中能产生清晰的触觉反馈。

Galaxy S24 的显示屏下方集成了包括超声波技术在内的指纹传感器,解锁快速可靠。基于前置摄像头的人脸解锁功能还配备了非常不安全的 2D 人脸识别功能。

三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测

显示屏 - 三星智能手机的显示屏特别明亮

OLED 显示屏采用 RGGB 子像素矩阵,由一个红光二极管、一个蓝光二极管和两个绿光二极管组成。
OLED 显示屏采用 RGGB 子像素矩阵,由一个红光二极管、一个蓝光二极管和两个绿光二极管组成。

Galaxy S23Galaxy S24 的用户看到的是一个非常相似的面板,被市场称为动态 AMOLED 2X。不过,现在的屏幕对角线尺寸为 6.2 英寸,峰值亮度为 2,600 cd/m²,最低刷新率为 1 Hz。我们可以根据测量数据确认前者。

Galaxy S24 的 OLED 面板是智能手机领域亮度输出最高的面板之一。在纯白背景和激活环境光传感器的情况下,最大亮度 "仅 "达到 1,387 cd/m²,但在明暗区域平均分布的情况下,显示屏会变得更亮(APL18:2,697 cd/m²)。在播放 4K HDR 模式视频时,我们甚至测得 2,885 cd/m²。在 HDR 标准方面,HLG、HDR10 和 HDR10+ 均包括在内,但不包括杜比视界。

同样,对于喜欢黑暗的人来说,S24 也是一个合适的伴侣。最低显示亮度仅为 1.4 cd/m²,处于相当低的水平,在使用 "额外调光 "功能时还会再降低 0.4 cd/m²。

LTPO 面板的刷新率可在 1 到 120 Hz 之间动态调节(制造商提供的信息),也可选择限制在 60 Hz。不过,系统规定 120 Hz 显示屏的最低频率为 24 Hz,而在许多应用(如 YouTube 或相册)中,恒定的 60 Hz 会出现。

1387
cd/m²
1365
cd/m²
1384
cd/m²
1376
cd/m²
1349
cd/m²
1362
cd/m²
1385
cd/m²
1360
cd/m²
1357
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1387 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1369.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.41 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1349 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.97
Samsung Galaxy S24
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2340x1080, 6.20
Samsung Galaxy S23
Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.10
Xiaomi 14
OLED, 2670x1200, 6.36
Apple iPhone 15
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.10
Google Pixel 8
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.20
Screen
-12%
14%
8%
17%
Brightness middle
1349
1125
-17%
1043
-23%
1046
-22%
1450
7%
Brightness
1369
1122
-18%
1052
-23%
1019
-26%
1410
3%
Brightness Distribution
97
96
-1%
96
-1%
94
-3%
92
-5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.3
3.2
3%
1.1
67%
1.4
58%
1.1
67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5
4.9
2%
2.8
44%
2.84
43%
4.2
16%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.4
3.3
-38%
1.9
21%
2.4
-0%
2.1
12%
Gamma
1.97 112%
1.97 112%
2.23 99%
2.158 102%
2.24 98%
CCT
6635 98%
6504 100%
6740 96%
6410 101%
6584 99%

* ... smaller is better

由于采用了 OLED 技术,三星使用 PWM 调制方式(包括屏幕闪烁)来调节屏幕亮度。在我们使用示波器进行测量时,整个亮度范围内的振幅曲线非常均匀,并在 240 Hz 和 480 Hz 之间不断波动。我们使用闪烁仪检测视觉上可感知的亮度波动,没有记录到任何冲突的结果。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 483 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 483 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 483 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

使用固定变焦和各种亮度设置进行一系列测量。

这款高端手机有两种色彩配置文件。如果想获得最准确的色彩和灰度还原,应选择 "自然 "色彩模式,因为它不允许调整色温。后者只能通过 "活力 "模式进行调整。在我们看来,这种在最佳屏幕校准或个人偏好的白色表现之间的妥协是不必要的。

我们使用卡尔曼分析软件和光度计分析了 AMOLED 面板的色彩再现能力。在使用两种色彩模式进行的测量中,我们记录到的色彩偏差非常小,测量到的 "自然 "色彩模式 DeltaE 值略高于小米 14 的 "自然 "色彩模式 DeltaE 值。 小米 14谷歌 Pixel 8.

色彩准确度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩准确度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(轮廓:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(轮廓:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(轮廓:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(轮廓:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(轮廓:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(轮廓:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩准确度(配置文件:鲜艳 + 暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩准确度(配置文件:鲜艳 + 暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:鲜艳 + 暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:鲜艳 + 暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(轮廓:鲜艳 + 暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(轮廓:鲜艳 + 暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:鲜艳 + 暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:鲜艳 + 暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.09 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.591 ms rise
↘ 0.499 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.57 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.379 ms rise
↘ 1.19 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

在户外,Galaxy S24 给人留下了非常好的印象,其亮度储备足以应对冬季的照明环境。但即使在盛夏条件下,大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 表面上的 AMOLED 面板由于亮度极高,反光也几乎不会限制其可读性。不过,如果您想手动调节亮度,您最多可以使用 420 cd/m²。使用 "额外亮度 "选项,亮度可提高到 775 cd/m²。

三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S24 智能手机评测

三星手机的可视角度稳定性非常好,从广角观看时,亮度只有微弱的可见损失。即使屏幕倾斜,Galaxy S24 的色彩依然鲜艳,不会出现反色现象。

三星Galaxy S24 的视角
三星Galaxy S24 的视角

性能 -Galaxy S24 采用三星自主研发的 SoC 处理器

经过一年的休整,与前作不同的是 不同的是与前代产品不同的是,三星在欧洲再次选择了其内部芯片解决方案,而不是当前的 旗舰 SoC来自高通公司。三星 Exynos 2400Galaxy S24 中使用的 Exynos 2400 与高通公司的骁龙 8 代 3 处理器使用相同的 ARM cortex 集群。 高通公司骁龙 8 代 3尽管内核数量和时钟速度有所不同。

CPU 架构 Samsung Exynos 2400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 forGalaxy
ARM Cortex X4 1 核 - 3.2 GHz 1 核 - 3.39 GHz
ARM Cortex A720 2 核 - 2.9 吉赫 3 核 - 3.1 吉赫
3 个内核 - 2.6 吉赫 2 个内核 - 2.9 吉赫
ARM Cortex A520 4 个内核 - 1.95 吉赫 2 个内核 - 2.2 吉赫

在我们的一系列 CPU 基准测试中,Galaxy S24 在一定程度上与 Galaxy S23骁龙 8 代 2Galaxy - 的 Exynos 2400被评为更强大,尤其是在 Geekbench 多核测试中。不过,与前代产品相比,Galaxy S24 的单核性能仅略有提升。浏览一下 超级型号及其 骁龙 8 代 3Galaxy显示,Exynos 2400 的性能水平较低。不过,考虑到额外的 Cortex A520 内核和三星 SoC 较低的时钟速度,这也在意料之中。

让人有些难以理解的是Galaxy S24 的内存政策。当然,8 GB 内存对于顶级手机来说仍然足够,但就我们而言,12 GB 版本--尤其是考虑到 2031 年之前的更新保证--是必须的。尤其是在 24GB RAM 已经进入中端 的情况下。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1884 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1716 Points +10%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1684 Points +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (1553 - 1567, n=2)
1560 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1553 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1549 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1260 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1145 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=216, last 2 years)
914 Points -41%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
6426 Points +16%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6307 Points +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (5561 - 5871, n=2)
5716 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
5561 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
4974 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 15
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
4688 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3474 Points -38%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
3395 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=216, last 2 years)
2997 Points -46%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2465 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2287 Points +12%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2144 Points +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (2045 - 2066, n=2)
2056 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
2045 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1984 Points -3%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1653 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=101, last 2 years)
1407 Points -31%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
7102 Points +10%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6914 Points +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (6456 - 6534, n=2)
6495 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
6456 Points
Apple iPhone 15
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
6019 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
5149 Points -20%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4225 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=101, last 2 years)
3876 Points -40%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18672 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
17763 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (17534 - 17763, n=2)
17649 Points -1%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17620 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
15270 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
14068 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=211, last 2 years)
11762 Points -34%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
10897 Points -39%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1443 Points +15%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (1256 - 1290, n=2)
1273 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 15
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1260 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1256 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1221 Points -3%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1165 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
957 Points -24%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
955 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=164, last 2 years)
835 Points -34%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10370 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9696 Points +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (9287 - 9467, n=2)
9377 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
9287 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8830 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6991 Points -25%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
6974 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)
5745 Points -38%
System
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
16475 Points +14%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
15741 Points +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (14406 - 15253, n=2)
14830 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
14406 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
14401 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
11210 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)
9678 Points -33%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
8251 Points -43%
Memory
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11252 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
10389 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
10193 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (10178 - 10193, n=2)
10186 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
9115 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8871 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6413 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)
6250 Points -39%
Graphics
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
31876 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
27905 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
26783 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
26748 Points 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (25796 - 26783, n=2)
26290 Points -2%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
18975 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17269 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)
14101 Points -47%
Web
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2048 Points +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (1908 - 1998, n=2)
1953 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1924 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1908 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1815 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1779 Points -7%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1657 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)
1494 Points -22%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
25563 Points +121%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=149, last 2 years)
21860 Points +89%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18852 Points +63%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
18370 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
16702 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
11574 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (11342 - 11574, n=2)
11458 Points -1%
AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 15
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
26368 Points +2225%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)
17833 Points +1473%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1518 Points +34%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1381 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1320 Points +16%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1136 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1134 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (1121 - 1134, n=2)
1128 Points -1%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1980553 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1837994 Points +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (1616403 - 1777871, n=2)
1697137 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1616403 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1508318 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (281399 - 2162423, n=50, last 2 years)
1242325 Points -23%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1107295 Points -31%

Xclipse 940 iGPU Xclipse 940 iGPU集成到 Exynos 2400基于 AMD RDNA 3 架构。与 Radeon 780MGalaxy S24 中的图形处理器只有一半的着色器单元。

在图形测试中,Xclipse 940 iGPU 的表现非常出色,但在 3DMark 基准测试中却远远落后于 Adreno 750.而 Ultra 型号的在 GFXBench 屏幕数值测试中,Ultra 机型的更高分辨率使Galaxy S24 的较低性能得到了一定程度的改善。然而,令人有些意外的是,Adreno 750 有时会比 Xclipse 940 iGPU 性能更好。归根结底,我们需要处理的是与 S23 相比功率略有增加的问题。 Galaxy S23 的Adreno 740.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4804 Points +22%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4729 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3933 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3699 Points -6%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2439 Points -38%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
2411 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1855 Points -53%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5040 Points +29%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4744 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3902 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3857 Points -1%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points -38%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
2409 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1946 Points -50%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20068 Points +59%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19319 Points +53%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13911 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12652 Points
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
12092 Points -4%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8977 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7458 Points -41%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8264 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7510 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6649 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5603 Points -16%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3332 Points -50%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8689 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8620 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6673 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5583 Points -16%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3229 Points -52%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +1%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
549 fps +36%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
538 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
459 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
403 fps
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
333.7 fps -17%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
317 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps -25%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps -34%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
339 fps +17%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
331 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
289 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
271 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
193 fps -33%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
185.4 fps -36%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps -66%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps -6%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps -46%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
264 fps +23%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
186 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
133.4 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps -43%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps -57%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -43%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
58.1 fps -45%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -45%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps +19%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
142 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
131 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps -6%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
89.6 fps -32%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -49%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -7%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps -31%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
58.1 fps -45%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -47%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps -51%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps -9%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
46.7 fps -32%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps -58%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps -3%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps -44%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -49%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
207 fps +35%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
187 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps -8%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
112 fps -27%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -56%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40 fps +25%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38 fps +19%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -6%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
19.8 fps -38%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -50%

在浏览器速度方面,三星智能手机没有理由躲避。网站加载速度很快,滚动浏览也很流畅。在浏览器基准测试中,Galaxy S24 一直保持良好的成绩。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117)
259.7 Points +102%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
215.569 Points +68%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
158.595 Points +23%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (128.6 - 139.1, n=2)
133.9 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
128.638 Points
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=172, last 2 years)
105.8 Points -18%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
104.25 Points -19%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117)
327 runs/min +22%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
267 runs/min
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
264 runs/min -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (260 - 267, n=2)
264 runs/min -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
136 runs/min -49%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
136 runs/min -49%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min -60%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
196 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
176 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (176 - 176, n=2)
176 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
146 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=159, last 2 years)
99.9 Points -43%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
94 Points -47%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117)
68554 Points +8%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
68454 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
63748 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (63452 - 63748, n=2)
63600 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
59913 Points -6%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
47776 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=210, last 2 years)
33573 Points -47%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years)
1599 ms * -141%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
998 ms * -51%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
701.7 ms * -6%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
662.3 ms *
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (631 - 662, n=2)
647 ms * +2%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
623.9 ms * +6%
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117)
506 ms * +24%

* ... smaller is better

我们的 256 GB 版本的 UFS 4.0 存储速度非常快,但尤其是在写入速度方面,三星并没有获得最高分。不过,这与安装的存储驱动器本身关系不大,更多的是与 Exynos 2400 的内存控制器有关。这种性能上的不足是否真的会对日常加载速度造成明显影响,值得怀疑。

Samsung Galaxy S24Xiaomi 14Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
86%
13%
47%
-16%
Sequential Read 256KB
3701.23
3385.74
-9%
3610.25
-2%
Sequential Write 256KB
1435.39
2906.65
102%
1893.63
32%
Random Read 4KB
373.12
420.99
13%
437.12
17%
Random Write 4KB
175.98
594.78
238%
181.55
3%
Samsung Galaxy S24Samsung Galaxy S23Xiaomi 14Google Pixel 8Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
PCMark for Android
38%
49%
-35%
61%
36%
-2%
Storage 2.0 seq. read int.
2345 ?(3.0.4061)
2370.62
1%
2452 ?(3.0.4061)
5%
1627 ?(3.0.4061)
-31%
2787.27
19%
Storage 2.0 seq. write int.
1108 ?(3.0.4061)
2081.06
88%
2817 ?(3.0.4061)
154%
570 ?(3.0.4061)
-49%
2991.55
170%
2232 ?(1108 - 2992, n=10)
101%
Storage 2.0 random read int.
50.9 ?(3.0.4061)
50.91
0%
29.6 ?(3.0.4061)
-42%
16 ?(3.0.4061)
-69%
60.38
19%
40.6 ?(20.9 - 60.4, n=10)
-20%
Storage 2.0 random write int.
64.4 ?(3.0.4061)
85.66
33%
62.9 ?(3.0.4061)
-2%
39.7 ?(3.0.4061)
-38%
96.83
50%
Storage 2.0
21538 ?(3.0.4061)
35786
66%
49601 ?(3.0.4061)
130%
24572 ?(3.0.4061)
14%
32146
49%

游戏 - 三星Galaxy S24 可以达到 120fps 的速度

为了能够评估 Xclipse 940 iGPU 的的图形处理能力,我们使用GameBench 应用程序查看了三款 PlayStore 游戏。.在 前代产品起步有点不稳之后,我们非常想知道Galaxy S24 在多大程度上可以实现 HFR 游戏。

对于系统要求较低的游戏(如第一人称射击游戏《死亡扳机 2》),Galaxy S24 偶尔可以达到最高支持的每秒 120 帧。在中等设置(高清设置)下,《PUBG Mobile》等现代游戏可以达到 60 帧/秒。在最高细节级别(UHD)下,三星手机的运行帧数始终为 40fps。对战游戏的最低图形设置也支持 90fps 选项,这意味着这款顶级智能手机可以在低细节的情况下达到 90fps。

Galaxy S24 上的第三款游戏是要求苛刻的《源氏冲击》,在最高图形设置下显示为 60fps。如果降低这款奇幻动作 RPG 游戏的细节级别,Android ,帧率也能保持在每秒 60 帧。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
死亡扳机 2
死亡扳机 2
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S24; Dead Trigger 2: Ø118.6 (116-121)
Samsung Galaxy S24; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø59.2 (51-61)
Samsung Galaxy S24; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø57.8 (44-63)
Samsung Galaxy S24; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø89.3 (73-91)
Samsung Galaxy S24; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø58.9 (41-61)
Samsung Galaxy S24; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.7 (36-41)

排放--三星智能手机的温度真的很高

温度

Galaxy S24 在燃烧测试中过热
Galaxy S24 在燃烧测试中过热

在我们的测量中,表面温度相当高,特别是考虑到 Burnout 基准测试在满负荷(CPU + GPU)情况下由于过热而停止运行。这意味着我们的测试仅在较宽松的条件下进行(CPU)。

此外,我们还进行了 3DMark 压力测试,在运行 30 次之后,出现了中度到重度节流,节流率超过 40%。因此,在 SoC 节流方面,Galaxy S24 与前代产品 的水平、但性能水平略高。同样,GFXBench 基准电池测试(ES3.1)的运行也没有问题,但会出现错误信息("内存不足"),让用户对测试结果一无所知。

Max. Load
 43.3 °C42.6 °C36.2 °C 
 43.4 °C42.5 °C40.8 °C 
 43.1 °C40.8 °C39.8 °C 
Maximum: 43.4 °C
Average: 41.4 °C
39.1 °C41.5 °C41.9 °C
38.8 °C40.6 °C43.6 °C
38.8 °C41.8 °C44 °C
Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 41.1 °C
Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83.4 % +10%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
76.3 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.5 %
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.6 % -9%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
84.3 % +48%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 % +39%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57 %
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.8 % -6%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 % +23%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
68.1 % +18%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.9 %
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø17.9 (14.7-25.8)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø15.5 (12.4-23.1)
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø12 (11.4-13.6)
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.7 (11.3-14.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø73 (66.2-87.7)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø58.5 (52.3-76.3)
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø47.9 (44.8-58.7)
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.6 (43.2-51.8)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø76.6 (62-85.7)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø66.7 (56-85.8)
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.9 (43.5-53.7)
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.9 (43.5-53.7)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.8 (16.9-29.8)
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø23.1 (20.7-29.2)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.3 (16.7-28.9)
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø22.6 (20.4-28.8)
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø9.41 (8.41-12.3)

发言人

Galaxy S24 依赖于 AKG 优化的双扬声器系统,支持杜比全景声(Dolby Atmos),声场强大,我们测得的最大音量超过 91 分贝。这款三星智能手机无法处理深沉的音调,但低音效果明显。我们的粉红噪声测量显示出与 Galaxy S23这意味着我们使用的可能是相同的硬件。

希望使用外部声音输出的用户可以通过有线 USB 端口或蓝牙 5.3 无线方式实现。后者的编解码器数量相对较少(SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC 和 SSC)。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.236.42530.733.33125.636.84026.733.35036.735.86324.636.48017.639.210018.739.812518.244.516015.956.120017.35625015.260.431514.161.940013.462.150013.86763014.365.480013.770.6100012.476.1125012.777.7160012.175.2200012.978.5250012.579.3315012.282.7400012.882.7500013.181.3630013.582.6800013.1791000013.775.9125001472.51600013.369SPL25.291.4N0.786.8median 13.5median 75.2Delta1.28.933.839.127.936.924.332.928.234.636.742.822.238.925.439.52141.918.646.715.453.515.155.613.160.11262.412.762.911.866.912.966.710.471.513.375.913.278.412.178.912.281.212.981.414.88115.881.716.180.714.481.813.67913.576.814.471.41567.825.991.50.788median 13.5median 75.91.39.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S24Samsung Galaxy S23
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S24 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S23 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 -Galaxy S24 配有大容量电池

耗电量

有线充电仍只能在 25 瓦的情况下进行 (Galaxy S23:25 瓦),而且不包括足够快的充电器。使用强大的能源(Powerbank,100 瓦,PD 3.0),我们可以在 85 分钟内为三星智能手机完全充电,大约半小时后,充电量为 50%。无线充电的功率可达 15 瓦,此外,在 Wireless PowerShare 的帮助下,还可以通过Galaxy S24 为耳机或智能手表充电。

三星手机空闲运行时的平均耗电量约为 1 瓦,耗电量还算不错,但其前代产品及其 高通 SoC的能耗要低一些。不出所料,在 "Burnout "基准测试中,负载功耗明显高于Galaxy S23。Exynos 芯片组的功耗超过 16 瓦,与小米 14 的功耗相比高出很多。 小米 14.

此外,Galaxy S24 在待机模式下的耗电量也非常高。 在一夜之间,储能设备有时会损失 6 到 8 个百分点,甚至没有使用过。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.42 / 0.93 / 1.07 Watt
Load midlight 15.43 / 16.51 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S23
3900 mAh
Xiaomi 14
4610 mAh
Apple iPhone 15
3349 mAh
Google Pixel 8
4575 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
28%
17%
-9%
7%
8%
-22%
Idle Minimum *
0.42
0.57
-36%
0.51
-21%
0.9
-114%
0.56
-33%
0.425 ?(0.42 - 0.43, n=2)
-1%
Idle Average *
0.93
0.74
20%
0.89
4%
1
-8%
1.08
-16%
Idle Maximum *
1.07
0.83
22%
0.92
14%
1.1
-3%
1.17
-9%
Load Average *
15.43
4.26
72%
9.08
41%
6
61%
8.01
48%
Load Maximum *
16.51
6.16
63%
9.11
45%
13.6
18%
8.89
46%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.31 (0.634-16.5)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.19 (0.819-14)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.586 (0.548-0.797)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.699 (0.602-1.197)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.2 (6.48-16.6)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.8 (10.5-13)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.586 (0.548-0.797)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.699 (0.602-1.197)

电池寿命

Galaxy S24 的能量包比前一代产品的电池多 100 毫安时。 前代(3,900 mAh)。我们使用自适应显示屏亮度设置为 150 cd/m² 进行了实际测试,Galaxy ,结果非常不错。不过,这也凸显了 Exnos 2400相比 骁龙 8 代 2-处理器的 前代.

但是,我们应该正确看待负载下的低数值。对于Galaxy S24,我们采用了新的测试程序(Burnout 基准),而不是以前的 "稳定性测试 "应用程序。Android 14 不再支持后者。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
39h 58min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 122)
14h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 27min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 39min
Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S23
3900 mAh
Xiaomi 14
4610 mAh
Apple iPhone 15
3349 mAh
Google Pixel 8
4575 mAh
Battery Runtime
34%
39%
31%
-1%
Reader / Idle
2398
2249
-6%
2926
22%
2698
13%
1493
-38%
H.264
1227
1255
2%
1674
36%
1305
6%
1363
11%
WiFi v1.3
880
926
5%
1092
24%
1002
14%
814
-7%
Load
159
370
133%
277
74%
306
92%
205
29%

Pros

+ 结构凑紧,品质卓越
+ 非常明亮的 120 Hz AMOLED 面板
+ 超长更新周期
+ 良好的立体声音效
+ 极具吸引力的摄像头套件
+ 高性能...

Cons

- ...... 高级节流
- 存储限制(z.T. UFS 3.1,没有 512 GB)
- BT 编解码器不多
- 散热和功耗高
- 无 WiFi 7
- 没有 12 GB 内存选项
- 充电慢

结论 - 三星Galaxy S24

评论:SamsungGalaxy S24。评测设备由德国三星公司和 notebooksbilliger.de 提供
评论:SamsungGalaxy S24。评测设备由德国三星公司和 notebooksbilliger.de 提供

Galaxy S24 结构紧凑、重量轻,给人一种非常高级的感觉。凭借其出色的更新政策,三星为其高端智能手机提供了额外的卖点。但是,这些优点已经与 Galaxy S23而且,从软件角度来看,在升级到 One UI 6.1(其中包括Galaxy AI)后,这两款Galaxy 机型的功能将大同小异。当然,Galaxy S24 拥有更亮的显示屏、更长的更新时间和比前代机型更强的动力,但考虑到已安装的硬件,2024 机型给人的印象是三星的停滞不前,而不是持续的进一步发展。处理器 Exynos 2400当然,在欧洲使用的 Exynos 2400 芯片组既不是 "问题",也不是破坏交易的因素,但三星芯片组也并非没有受到批评。尤其是高功耗和明显的散热问题,是造成电池续航时间比同类产品短的原因。在这方面 小米 14的续航能力要明显好于三星的高端设备,而且由于采用了 骁龙 8 代 3WiFi 7、蓝牙 5.4 以及高水平的充电性能。

三星Galaxy S24 仍然是Android 阵营中最好的紧凑型智能手机。尽管如此,前代产品的少量弱点并未得到解决,在这一代产品中依然存在。

我们希望Galaxy S25 的顶配版本配备 12 GB 内存和 512 GB 内部存储空间,这才适合这个价位的产品。此外,在显示设置和蓝牙编解码器的选择方面,三星应该向竞争对手寻求灵感。

如果有人认为Galaxy S24 的更新政策是一个强有力的卖点,那么谷歌 Pixel 8 将是一个额外的、相对小巧的替代品。由于谷歌的高端设备已在市场上销售了一段时间,因此购买 Pixel 8 的价格要便宜得多。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

三星Galaxy S24 的零售价为 799 美元,可在三星网上商店购买。此外,在有限的时间内,S24 在亚马逊网站上的售价为 699 美元。

Samsung Galaxy S24 - 03/07/2024 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
93%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
68 / 70 → 97%
Weight
91%
Battery
91%
Display
92%
Games Performance
71 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
96 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
77%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 84%
Camera
80%
Average
84%
90%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!