三星Galaxy S24+ 智能手机评测：Galaxy S24向S24 Ultra靠拢

Name: Samsung Galaxy S24+
Brand: Samsung

为身份加分。 今年的三星Galaxy S24 Plus 得益于多项改进，使其不再只是一个大号的Galaxy S24。特别是在运行时间方面，Plus 机型继续显示出自己的优势。在这篇评测中，您可以了解到Galaxy S24+ 在我们的测试中表现如何。

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 03/11/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Galaxy S Smartphone

根据其技术规格和价格，Galaxy S24+ 的定位介于小巧的 Galaxy S24和 S 系列旗舰产品 Galaxy S24 Ultra.购买 Plus 机型的用户只需支付 1999.99 美元的最高售价，即可获得 256 GB 的内部存储空间；而购买 UFS-4.0 存储设备的用户只需支付 200 美元的额外费用，即可获得两倍的存储空间。

与前代三星在很多方面改进了其高端智能手机。现在，Galaxy S24+ 标配 12GB RAM，Plus 机型的 WQHD+ 显示屏更接近 S 系列。超智能手机.与较小的姊妹机型一样，今年的Galaxy S24+ 没有使用芯片组芯片组，而是采用自家的 Exynos 2400.

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Galaxy S24 Series)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 2400 10 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A520

Graphics adapter

Samsung Xclipse 940

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

6.70 inch 19.5:9, 3120 x 1440 pixel 513 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB

, 463 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, barometer,, OTG, UWB, Miracast

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n25/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n75/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.7 x 158.5 x 75.9

Battery

4900 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, AF, OIS, Videos @4320p/30fps, Videos @2160p/60fps) + 12 MPix (f/2.2, wide angle lens) + 10 MPix (f/2.4, telephoto lens, OIS, 3x optical), camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.2, AF, Videos @2160p/60fps)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB cable, info material, One UI 6.1, 24 Months Warranty, widevine L1, SAR value: 0.744W/kg Head, 1.245W/kg Body, GNSS: GPS (L1/L5), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1, B2), Galileo (E1/E5), fanless, waterproof

Weight

196 g

Price

1149 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
89.8 %	03/2024	Samsung Galaxy S24+ Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940	196 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.70"	3120x1440
90.3 %	03/2023	Samsung Galaxy S23+ SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740	195 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.60"	2340x1080
89.4 %	01/2024	Xiaomi 14 Pro SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750	223 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.73"	3200x1440
89 %	12/2023	Google Pixel 8 Pro Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7	213 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2992x1344
86.8 %	02/2024	Nubia Z60 Ultra SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750	246 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.80"	2480x1116

机箱 -Galaxy S24 Plus，通过 IP 认证

这款通过 IP68 认证的高端三星手机的制造质量非常出色，没有任何缝隙或制造问题。所使用的材料手感优质，按键稳固地安装在铠甲铝边框内。手机的背面和正面使用了康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2。

由于边框更薄，6.7 英寸三星Galaxy S24+ 的外部尺寸与其前代产品非常相似前代产品仅增加了 0.1 英寸。这使得该机的屏占比更高，达到 91.6%，给人一种非常现代的感觉。

尺寸比较

连接性 - 配备 UWB 的三星手机

我们测试样品的 UFS-4.0 存储容量为 463 GB，内部存储无法扩展。Galaxy S24+ 具有丰富的连接选项，包括 NFC、USB-OTG、Miracast 以及支持有线图片输出的 USB 3.2（Gen 1）。与较小的姊妹机型S24 Plus 还包括一个超宽带芯片，这意味着Galaxy S24 Plus 可以与Galaxy SmartTag 2 等设备一起使用，以实现极其精确的定位。说到蓝牙，这款手机仍然只提供 5.3 标准，因为安装了 Exynos 2400不支持最新版本（5.4）。

在使用连接的 M.2 固态硬盘（三星 980 Pro）进行复制测试时，该设备 USB 端口的传输速率为 190 MB/s，大大低于该端口的性能。三星手机支持 exFAT 和 NTFS 数据系统，但只能读取 NTFS 格式的硬盘，而不能对其进行编辑。

软件 - 长时间更新的三星智能手机

Galaxy S24+ 运行最新的Android 14 和内部 OneUI 用户界面（6.1 版），其中包括全新的Galaxy AI。如果您想了解有关三星智能人工智能解决方案的更多信息，请参阅我们对 Galaxy S24.

在测试时，Galaxy S24+ 的最新安全补丁是二月份的，因此非常及时。三星保证为其顶级设备提供七年更新和七代主要Android 。根据制造商的说法，安全补丁将每月推出一次，但目前还不清楚具体时间。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 功能的Galaxy S24 Plus

Galaxy S24+ 支持接入移动 5G 网络以及各种 4G 频率。这款三星手机可以接入总共 22 个 LTE 频段，包括频段 20 和频段 28。

在家庭 Wi-Fi 网络中，Galaxy 手机提供快速的 Wi-Fi 6E，但目前还没有 Wi-Fi 7。结合我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，这足以满足平均每秒约 1,600 MBit 的传输速率。不过，在 6 GHz 频率范围内，Galaxy S24+ 的接收数据在我们的测试中出乎意料地低。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy S24+
iperf3 receive AXE11000	648 (min: 582) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	859 (min: 401) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1581 (min: 1247) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1117 (min: 1031) MBit/s ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1623 (min: 1491) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1810 (min: 1724) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1804 (min: 902) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1534 (min: 1403) MBit/s ∼87%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1717 (min: 1627) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1783 (min: 911) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1728 (min: 1374) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1731 (min: 1657) MBit/s ∼98%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000	897 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	892 (min: 333) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1468 (min: 1069) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1467 (min: 1304) MBit/s ∼83%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
iperf3 receive AXE11000	969 (min: 488) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	915 (min: 477) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1680 (min: 920) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1761 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000	651 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	687 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1536 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1364 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼77%

Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Samsung Xclipse 940; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1581 (1247-1658)

Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1774 (902-1862)

Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Samsung Xclipse 940; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1117 (1031-1173)

Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1533 (1403-1594)

Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Samsung Xclipse 940; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø646 (582-790)

Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1623 (1491-1679)

Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Samsung Xclipse 940; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø846 (401-943)

Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1810 (1724-1871)

为了在实践中评估其定位精度，我们使用Galaxy S24+ 进行了一次自行车骑行，并使用 Garmin Venu 2 记录了我们的路线，以便进行比较。详细的路线显示，三星手机只有轻微的误差，整体定位能力非常准确。

电话功能和通话质量 - 支持双 SIM 卡的三星智能手机

Galaxy S24+ 支持两张 nanoSIM 卡，支持 VoLTE-plus，允许通过家庭 WLAN（WiFi 通话）拨打电话。与其相比三星手机只具有双 eSIM 卡功能。

它的通话质量非常好。声音可以清晰地回放，安静的环境噪音也能被有效过滤。通过Galaxy AI，Galaxy S24+ 可以在使用三星电话应用程序时实时翻译通话内容，而无需联网。

相机 -Galaxy S24 Plus，5000 万像素

手机的 50-MPix 光学稳定主摄像头采用 ISOCELL GN3，与前代产品相同。前代产品相同。这个 1/1.57 英寸的摄像头传感器无论在白天还是晚上都能拍摄出非常出色的照片，尽管照片有时对焦有些偏软。三星手机还具有出色的色彩还原能力。虽然绿色色调有些过于鲜艳，但色彩偏差相对较小。如果用户想对光圈、曝光和白平衡等参数进行调整，还可以使用所谓的 "专业模式 "和 "专家 RAW"，这两种模式都提供了丰富的功能。

主摄像头由一个 1200 万像素的超广角镜头提供支持，该镜头的视场角为 120°，而不是 85°。在光线条件良好的情况下，该镜头的成像质量尚可，但与 50 万像素镜头相比，使用该镜头拍摄的照片显示出更多的图像误差和噪点。在这方面，三星的下一代Galaxy-S 确实应该有所改进。

我们更喜欢Galaxy S24+ 的变焦功能。它的长焦镜头可实现高达 3 倍的无损变焦，分辨率为 10 百万像素。在 5 倍变焦的情况下，三星手机仍能保留相当多的细节和良好的清晰度。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angle Wide-angle Low-light Ultra-wide angle Zoom 5x

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件和保修 - 不带电源的三星手机

手机的供货范围不包括充电器，开箱后显示屏也没有安装保护盖。包装盒内只有一条 USB 数据线和信息宣传单。

在美国，Galaxy 智能手机享有标准的 12 个月有限保修服务。您还可以选择购买名为 Care+ 的保险套餐，该套餐可为Galaxy S24+ 提供长达两年的损坏和失窃保险。

输入设备和操作 - 配备面部解锁功能的Galaxy S24 Plus

在手机 6.7 英寸触摸屏上的各个角落都能准确输入，而且执行速度很快。Galaxy S24+ 的操作非常流畅，其振动电机能释放出清晰的触觉反馈。

三星手机使用 OLED 面板下方的超声波传感器来验证用户身份，它能快速可靠地识别保存的指纹。此外，还通过 2D 面部解锁功能提供生物识别安全性。

显示屏 -Galaxy 智能手机配备超亮显示屏

OLED 显示屏采用 RGGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和两个绿色 LED 组成。

6.7 英寸 AMOLED 面板的刷新率高达 120 赫兹。LTPO 面板允许将频率调整到最低 1 Hz。但在我们的测试中，我们只从系统数据中读取了最低 24 Hz 的频率。

与的前身相比，一个很大的不同是屏幕的像素密度。Galaxy S23+ 采用的是 FullHD+ 分辨率，而其后续机型的屏幕分辨率为 1,440p，与Galaxy S24 Ultra 处于同一水平。

为了调节亮度，

Galaxy 智能手机使用了 OLED 典型的 PWM，频率为 240 至 480 Hz。在我们使用示波器进行的测量中，手机整个亮度范围内的振幅曲线非常均匀。

我们测得的最大亮度接近 1,400 cd/m²，这在同价位手机中是非常不错的，在实际的 APL18 测试（平均画质水平）中，它的最大亮度也达到了 2,610 cd/m²。在播放 4K-HDR 格式视频时，我们甚至测得 2793 cd/m²。


1384 cd/m²	1314 cd/m²	1318 cd/m²
1396 cd/m²	1358 cd/m²	1310 cd/m²
1431 cd/m²	1372 cd/m²	1337 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1431 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1357.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.44 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 1358 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.98

	Samsung Galaxy S24+ AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.70	Samsung Galaxy S23+ Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.60	Xiaomi 14 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.73	Google Pixel 8 Pro OLED, 2992x1344, 6.70	Nubia Z60 Ultra AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.80
Screen		-4%	11%	21%	-2%
Brightness middle	1358	1128 -17%	1025 -25%	1510 11%	1003 -26%
Brightness	1358	1136 -16%	1046 -23%	1467 8%	1001 -26%
Brightness Distribution	92	99 8%	95 3%	92 0%	96 4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3	2.7 10%	1.1 63%	1.1 63%	1.7 43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.4	4.5 -2%	2.9 34%	3.8 14%	3.6 18%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.5	2.6 -4%	2.2 12%	1.7 32%	3.1 -24%
Gamma	1.98 ^111%	2.05 ^107%	2.25 ^98%	2.23 ^99%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6656 ^98%	6644 ^98%	6622 ^98%	6670 ^97%	6257 ^104%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

479 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 479 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 479 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

我们利用光光谱仪和 CalMAN 软件对显示器的色彩进行了分析。它的色彩和灰度偏差都在目标范围内（<3），但是，与小米 14 Pro 相比，它的色彩和灰度偏差都在目标范围内（<3）。小米 14 Pro或像素 8 ProGalaxy S24+ 的校准效果并不理想。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.6165 ms rise
1.12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.5035 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.283 ms rise
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.514 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

外观方面，三星手机给人留下了深刻印象。在阳光直射下，显示内容依然清晰可辨。我们对其视角稳定性也没有任何负面评价。即使从极端角度观看屏幕，OLED 面板的色彩也能保持稳定。

性能 - 配备 Eynos SoC 的Galaxy S24 Plus

Galaxy S24+ 依赖于非常强大的 SoC，即 Exynos 2400-不过，它比骁龙 8 代 3的超强机型.配备快速 ARM Cortex X4 处理器的 CPU 单元与 12GB RAM 的组合确保了良好的基准测试结果。特别是在 Geekbench multi 分数方面，Galaxy S24+ 与前代产品相比有了很大改进。前代产品.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	1702 Points +9%
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1687 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	1567 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1563 Points 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (1553 - 1567, n=2)	1560 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	1274 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)	911 Points -42%
Multi-Core
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	6543 Points +11%
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	6439 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	5871 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (5561 - 5871, n=2)	5716 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	4906 Points -16%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	3624 Points -38%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)	2988 Points -49%

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	2278 Points +10%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	2268 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	2066 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (2045 - 2066, n=2)	2056 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	1769 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 2930, n=105, last 2 years)	1390 Points -33%
Multi-Core
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	7004 Points +7%
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	6875 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	6534 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (6456 - 6534, n=2)	6495 Points -1%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	4538 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 7408, n=105, last 2 years)	3840 Points -41%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	18445 Points +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (17534 - 17763, n=2)	17649 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	17534 Points
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	15876 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	15483 Points -12%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	11824 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)	11771 Points -33%

CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1332 Points +3%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	1331 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	1290 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (1256 - 1290, n=2)	1273 Points -1%
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1167 Points -10%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	935 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)	837 Points -35%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	10966 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	9467 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (9287 - 9467, n=2)	9377 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	8730 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points -39%
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	Points -100%
System
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	15863 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	15253 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (14406 - 15253, n=2)	14830 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	13602 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)	9672 Points -37%
Memory
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	12306 Points +21%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (10178 - 10193, n=2)	10186 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	10178 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	9212 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)	6267 Points -38%
Graphics
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	34538 Points +34%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (25796 - 26783, n=2)	26290 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	25796 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	25642 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)	14220 Points -45%
Web
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	2145 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	1998 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (1908 - 1998, n=2)	1953 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1808 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)	1495 Points -25%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	27018 Points +138%
Average of class Smartphone (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)	21814 Points +92%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	17407 Points +53%
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	16988 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	16464 Points +45%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (11342 - 11574, n=2)	11458 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	11342 Points

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)	17833 Points +1491%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	1623 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1216 Points +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (1121 - 1134, n=2)	1128 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	1121 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	1109 Points -1%
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	Points -100%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	2103436 Points +18%
Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1905751 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	1777871 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (1616403 - 1777871, n=2)	1697137 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (281399 - 2162423, n=51, last 2 years)	1249818 Points -30%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	1113506 Points -37%

在图形计算方面，Xclipse 940 iGPU Xclipse 940 iGPU集成在 Exynos 2400处理的图形计算方面，三星手机再次取得了非常出色的成绩。由于显示屏的像素密度较高，其屏幕上的数值（正如预期的那样）比 Galaxy S23+或 Galaxy S24的屏幕数值要低（在意料之中）。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5175 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4235 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3528 Points -17%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2410 Points -43%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5211 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4256 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3877 Points -9%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2422 Points -43%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	19641 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14566 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13098 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8922 Points -32%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +1%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +1%
Xiaomi 14 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	546 fps +44%
Xiaomi 14 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	543 fps +44%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	480 fps +27%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	378 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	348 fps -8%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +1%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +1%
Xiaomi 14 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	363 fps +17%
Xiaomi 14 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	362 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	310 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	278 fps -10%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	174 fps -44%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +1%
Xiaomi 14 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps -3%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	279 fps +14%
Xiaomi 14 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	269 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	244 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	215 fps -12%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	112 fps -54%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	110 fps +62%
Xiaomi 14 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	88 fps +29%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	68 fps
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -12%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	162 fps +17%
Xiaomi 14 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	159 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	139 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	127 fps -9%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75 fps -46%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	100 fps +47%
Xiaomi 14 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	76 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	68 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps -7%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -12%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	94 fps +25%
Xiaomi 14 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	85 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	75 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	63 fps -16%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps -51%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +45%
Xiaomi 14 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	109 fps +31%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	91 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	83 fps
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -28%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	229 fps +30%
Xiaomi 14 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	209 fps +19%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	176 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	164 fps -7%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps -44%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	42 fps +24%
Xiaomi 14 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	39 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	34 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	31 fps -9%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	16 fps -53%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Edge 120)	197.49 Points +42%
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Chrome 121)	69.161 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)	176.612 Points +27%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)	162.564 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)	139.087 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (128.6 - 139.1, n=2)	133.9 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points -24%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)	105.175 Points -24%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (260 - 267, n=2)	264 runs/min +2%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)	260 runs/min
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Edge 120)	215 runs/min -17%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)	158 runs/min -39%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)	150 runs/min -42%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)	141 runs/min -46%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min -59%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)	181 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)	176 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (176 - 176, n=2)	176 Points 0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Edge 120)	161 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)	151 Points -14%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)	103 Points -41%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)	100.2 Points -43%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)	198 Points
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)	129 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24+	Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Edge 120)	68315 Points +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (63452 - 63748, n=2)	63600 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)	63452 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)	60423 Points -5%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)	54365 Points -14%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)	49506 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)	33357 Points -47%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * -153%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)	840.2 ms * -33%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)	801.6 ms * -27%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)	699 ms * -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (631 - 662, n=2)	647 ms * -3%
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Edge 120)	646.8 ms * -3%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)	630.8 ms *

* ... smaller is better

得益于其高性能和快速存储，您在日常使用中不会遇到任何明显的延迟，几乎在任何情况下系统都能流畅运行。与 Galaxy S24类似，它的读写速度略低于我们对 UFS-4.0 标准的预期。

	Samsung Galaxy S24+	Samsung Galaxy S23+	Google Pixel 8 Pro	Nubia Z60 Ultra	Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		1%	-34%	128%	90%	-12%
Sequential Read 256KB	2450.9	3250.14 33%	1501.13 -39%	3926.73 60%	3712 ?(2451 - 4512, n=19) 51%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) -38%
Sequential Write 256KB	1523.87	1014.33 -33%	257.28 -83%	3518.47 131%	3042 ?(1524 - 3678, n=19) 100%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) -27%
Random Read 4KB	387.42	441.77 14%	156.16 -60%	477.73 23%	416 ?(268 - 480, n=19) 7%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) -36%
Random Write 4KB	176.19	156.82 -11%	258.92 47%	701.13 298%	530 ?(174.3 - 709, n=19) 201%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 54%

	Samsung Galaxy S24+	Xiaomi 14 Pro	Nubia Z60 Ultra	Samsung Galaxy S24	Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
PCMark for Android		8%	70%	-5%	51%	-8%
Storage 2.0 seq. read int.	2327 ?(3.0.4061)	2075 ?(3.0.4061) -11%	3428.59 47%	2345 ?(3.0.4061) 1%	2647 ?(1661 - 3429, n=10) 14%	1549 ?(278 - 3429, n=62, last 2 years) -33%
Storage 2.0 seq. write int.	1201 ?(3.0.4061)	2300 ?(3.0.4061) 92%	2541.76 112%	1108 ?(3.0.4061) -8%	2531 ?(1201 - 3236, n=10) 111%	1315 ?(94.2 - 3236, n=62, last 2 years) 9%
Storage 2.0 random read int.	50 ?(3.0.4061)	20.9 ?(3.0.4061) -58%	65.78 32%	50.9 ?(3.0.4061) 2%	56.1 ?(28.5 - 67.7, n=10) 12%	38.6 ?(16 - 67.7, n=62, last 2 years) -23%
Storage 2.0 random write int.	66.7 ?(3.0.4061)	28 ?(3.0.4061) -58%	90.19 35%	64.4 ?(3.0.4061) -3%	86.3 ?(31.7 - 136.2, n=10) 29%	59.7 ?(22.2 - 136.2, n=62, last 2 years) -10%
Storage 2.0	25276 ?(3.0.4061)	35634 41% 35634 ?(3.0.4061) 41%	56018 122%	21538 ?(3.0.4061) -15%	47833 ?(25276 - 63116, n=16) 89%	29868 ?(6296 - 63116, n=123, last 2 years) 18%

游戏 -Galaxy S24 Plus 的速度超过 100 fps

让我们看看 Xclipse 940 iGPU是否也适用于 HFR 游戏，GameBench应用程序的帮助下，看看 Xclipse 940 iGPU 是否也适用于 HFR 游戏。在系统要求较低的游戏中，如第一人称射击游戏《死亡扳机 2》，使用Galaxy S24+ 可以达到平均 100 帧以上。现代游戏，如《PUBG Mobile》，使用最低图形设置只能达到 90 帧/秒的高帧率。在最高细节级别（UHD）下，三星手机的运行速度为 40 fps。我们的第三款游戏是要求苛刻的《玄心冲击》，在Galaxy S24+ 上以最高图形设置显示为 60 fps。

Samsung Galaxy S24+; Dead Trigger 2: Ø104.8 (76-118)

Samsung Galaxy S24+; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø59.5 (47-61)

Samsung Galaxy S24+; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø58.7 (52-62)

Samsung Galaxy S24+; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø88.7 (41-91)

Samsung Galaxy S24+; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø58.9 (48-60)

Samsung Galaxy S24+; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.6 (34-41)

排放 - 三星手机会发热

温度

在我们的测量中，手机的表面温度相当高。与 Galaxy S24相比，Plus 型号在标准测试条件（CPU+GPU）下完成了 "Burnout "基准测试。在 3DMark 的 "野生动物 "压力测试中，Galaxy S24+ 的性能适度下降了约 20%。

Max. Load

Idle


47.1 °C	42.7 °C	39.3 °C
48.1 °C	49.5 °C	44.4 °C
47.8 °C	44.4 °C	43.8 °C

Maximum: 49.5 °C
Average: 45.2 °C


40.4 °C	44.8 °C	47.1 °C
41.8 °C	46.7 °C	48.1 °C
41.4 °C	45.4 °C	47.5 °C

Maximum: 48.1 °C
Average: 44.8 °C

Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.5 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.1 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	82.1 %
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78.8 % -4%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	67.3 % -18%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53.6 % -35%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81.5 %
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	76.3 % -6%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	76 % -7%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	57.8 % -29%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	83.8 % +41%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59.5 %

Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22.1 (20.9-25.6)

Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.3 (13.4-23.1)

Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.4 (11-14.5)

Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.6 (23.9-31.3)

Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø76.3 (71.1-86.7)

Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.7 (43-80.2)

Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø45.7 (40.7-51.6)

Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø84.6 (75.1-111.7)

Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø83.2 (72.3-89.6)

Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø47.9 (43.4-53.7)

Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø21.3 (17.7-29.7)

Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø27.9 (25.8-29.4)

Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø21.7 (17.5-29.4)

Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø26.5 (24.4-29.1)

发言人

三星手机的立体声扬声器给我们留下了深刻的印象，音质悦耳，高音均匀。不过，Galaxy S24+ 的扬声器低音效果不佳。中音很均衡，但还可以再线性一些。

如果您想从外部播放音乐，可以使用有线 USB-C 端口，或蓝牙 5.3。不过，后者使用的编解码器相对较少（SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC 和 SSC）。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy S24+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S23+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 配备无线充电功能的三星手机

耗电量

其功耗值并不显著。不出所料，其负载功耗明显高于 Galaxy S23+的功耗要高得多。

这款手机的电池容量为 4,900 毫安时，与上一代产品相比体积有所增大，在最大功率为 45 瓦的情况下，从零开始充电大约需要 80 分钟--前提是有相应的强大能源。在测试中，我们使用了一个电源箱（100 瓦，PD 3.0），因为交货时没有提供合适的电源适配器。Galaxy S24+ 能够以最高 15 瓦的功率进行无线充电，也能以最高 5 瓦的功率进行无线共享充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.03 / 0.22 Watt
Idle	0.43 / 0.84 / 0.95 Watt
Load	6.76 / 16.42 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Samsung Galaxy S24+ 4900 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S23+ 4700 mAh	Xiaomi 14 Pro 4880 mAh	Google Pixel 8 Pro 5050 mAh	Nubia Z60 Ultra 6000 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 2400	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		9%	-28%	-33%	-71%	-15%	-37%
Idle Minimum *	0.43	0.64 -49%	0.89 -107%	0.63 -47%	0.69 -60%	0.425 ?(0.42 - 0.43, n=2) 1%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -109%
Idle Average *	0.84	0.88 -5%	1.05 -25%	1.47 -75%	1.52 -81%	0.885 ?(0.84 - 0.93, n=2) -5%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) -73%
Idle Maximum *	0.95	0.94 1%	1.11 -17%	1.55 -63%	1.6 -68%	1.01 ?(0.95 - 1.07, n=2) -6%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) -71%
Load Average *	6.76	4.18 38%	9.03 -34%	8.45 -25%	14.73 -118%	11.1 ?(6.76 - 15.4, n=2) -64%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) 18%
Load Maximum *	16.42	6.59 60%	9.06 45%	8.63 47%	20.82 -27%	16.5 ?(16.4 - 16.5, n=2) -0%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) 49%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.59 (0.609-16.5)

Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.37 (0.957-17.6)

Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.595 (0.552-1.054)

Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.948 (0.88-1.177)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø13.2 (6.53-14.6)

Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø15.2 (13.6-16.4)

Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.595 (0.552-1.054)

Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.948 (0.88-1.177)

运行时间

在我们使用 150^cd/m2 的适配显示亮度进行的 WLAN 测试中，Galaxy S24+ 的续航时间约为 17 小时，可能比其前代产品要短。前代产品但这仍然是一个非常好的结果。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 121)		16h 49min

Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Samsung Galaxy S24+ 4900 mAh	1009 min
Samsung Galaxy S23+ 4700 mAh	1196 min
Xiaomi 14 Pro 4880 mAh	897 min
Google Pixel 8 Pro 5050 mAh	760 min
Nubia Z60 Ultra 6000 mAh	1275 min

Pros

+ 超亮 AMOLED 面板

+ 高像素密度

+ 高品质外壳

+ 超长更新周期

+ 极具吸引力的摄像头封装

+ 性能强劲

Cons

- 无 WiFi 7

- 很少有 BT 编解码器

- 高热量排放

三星Galaxy S24 Plus 的评价

SamsungGalaxy S24 Plus 评测。测试样品由 notebooksbilliger.de 提供

Galaxy S24+ 是 S24 的升级版，体积更小，重量更重，但也更大。 Galaxy S24.Plus 机型不仅在功能（WQHD+ 分辨率、12 GB 内存、512 GB 内部存储空间......）上介于另外两款Galaxy S24 智能手机之间，而且在效率方面也比其较小的姐妹机型有明显优势，因为它产生的热量更少。更好的冷却系统使 Exynos 2400在负载情况下消耗更少，性能更稳定。尽管像素密度更高，但运行时间长仍然是Galaxy S24+ 的一大优势。

如果您愿意在三星手机一流的更新交付方面做出一些妥协，那么小米 14 Pro和努比亚 Z60 Ultra可能是两款有趣的顶级手机替代品，而且这两款手机都配备了骁龙 8 代 3.Pixel 8 Pro 像素 8 Pro也是Galaxy S24+ 的一个令人兴奋的替代品，因为它拥有更好的摄像头。

由于Galaxy S24+ 的诸多改进，三星在 S24 系列中赋予了其高端手机更多的独立性。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

目前，三星Galaxy S24+ 在亚马逊上的售价为999.99 美元。

Samsung Galaxy S24+ - 2024-03-08 03/08/2024 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

93%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

69 / 70 → 98%

Weight

88%

Battery

91%

Display

92%

Games Performance

77 / 64 → 100%

Application Performance

96 / 86 → 100%

Temperature

83%

Noise

100%

Audio

75 / 90 → 84%

Camera

81%

Average

85%

90%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 215 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389876 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S24+ 智能手机评测：Galaxy S24向S24 Ultra靠拢

Marcus Herbrich, 2024-03-11 (Update: 2024-03-11)

三星Galaxy S24+ 智能手机评测：Galaxy S24向S24 Ultra靠拢

潜在的竞争对手比较

机箱 -Galaxy S24 Plus，通过 IP 认证

尺寸比较

连接性 - 配备 UWB 的三星手机

软件 - 长时间更新的三星智能手机

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 功能的Galaxy S24 Plus

电话功能和通话质量 - 支持双 SIM 卡的三星智能手机

相机 -Galaxy S24 Plus，5000 万像素

配件和保修 - 不带电源的三星手机

输入设备和操作 - 配备面部解锁功能的Galaxy S24 Plus

显示屏 -Galaxy 智能手机配备超亮显示屏

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 配备 Eynos SoC 的Galaxy S24 Plus

游戏 -Galaxy S24 Plus 的速度超过 100 fps

排放 - 三星手机会发热

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Samsung Galaxy S24+ audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S23+ audio analysis

电池寿命 - 配备无线充电功能的三星手机

耗电量

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

运行时间

Pros

Cons

三星Galaxy S24 Plus 的评价

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare