Apple iPhone 15 智能手机评测 - 手机终于拉近了距离Apple

Name: Apple iPhone 15
Brand: Apple

变色龙相机 第 15 代 iPhone 预计将继续跻身顶级智能手机行列。Apple 推出了具有长焦变焦和动态岛功能的新相机系统。了解我们的评测，以确定这些新功能是否引人注目。

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 10/27/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Apple ARM Smartphone 5G

Apple 2023 年 9 月 12 日，当这家总部位于加利福尼亚州的科技巨头在一场盛大的发布会上发布其最新一代 iPhone 时，全球的 iPhone 发烧友都在翘首以盼。虽然我们已经广泛评测了 iPhone 15 Pro和 iPhone 15 Pro Max本文将重点介绍Apple iPhone 15。

今年，iPhone 15 的起售价为 799 美元，配备了强大的 Apple A16 仿生处理器，并引入了全新的照相系统，配备 2 倍远摄变焦和动态岛技术（以前只有 Pro 系列才配备）。

不过，它的某些特性与去年相比没有变化：支持最快的 WLAN 标准 WiFi 6，缺少 "始终在线 "显示功能，屏幕采用 60 Hz 面板。在我们的评测中，我们将探讨谁会从这些变化中受益，并找出与 iPhone 14 相比的其他不同之处。 iPhone 14.

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Apple iPhone 15 (iPhone 15 Series)

Processor

Apple A16 Bionic 6 x 2 - 3.5 GHz, Crete

Graphics adapter

Apple A16 GPU 5-Core

Memory

6 GB

Display

6.10 inch 19.5:9, 2556 x 1179 pixel 461 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, Super Retina XDR OLED, Ceramic Shield, Dynamic Island, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz

Storage

128 GB NVMe, 128 GB

, 110 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: manometer, gyroscope, accelerometer, Proximity sensor

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B30/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B46/B48/B53/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n25/n26/n28/n30/n38/n40/n41/n48/n53/n66/n70/n77/n78/n79) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 147.6 x 71.6

Battery

3349 mAh Lithium-Ion, 20W charging (USB), 15W wireless charging (MagSafe), 7.5W wireless charging (Qi)

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Apple iOS 17

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/1.6, phase comparison-AF (All-pixel AF), OIS, dual LED-flash, Videos @2160p/60fps (Camera 1); 12.0MP, f/2.4, wide angle lens (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix f/1.9, phase comparison-AF, Videos @2160p/60fps

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), USB-C cable, SIM tool, 12 Months Warranty, IP68-certified, eSIM support, satellite communication (text messages, emergency calls), fanless, waterproof

Weight

171 g

Price

949 Euro

Links

Apple homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
89.1 %	10/2023	Apple iPhone 15 A16, A16 GPU 5-Core	171 g	128 GB NVMe	6.10"	2556x1179
89.2 %	10/2022	Apple iPhone 14 A15, A15 GPU 5-Core	172 g	128 GB NVMe	6.10"	2532x1170
90.7 %	10/2023	Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU	187 g	128 GB NVMe	6.10"	2556x1179
90.5 %	03/2023	Samsung Galaxy S23 SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740	167 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.10"	2340x1080
89.1 %	02/2023	Xiaomi 13 SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	189 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.36"	2400x1080
89 %	09/2023	Sony Xperia 5 V SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	182 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.10"	2520x1080

案例 - 更为全面

iPhone 15 并没有采用钛涂层铝合金外壳。 Pro和 Pro Max机型所采用的带钛涂层的铝金属外壳。Apple 将各种可回收材料融入手机中，继续践行可持续发展的承诺，详情可登录Apple 。.

iPhone 15 的背面由纯色玻璃制成，使Apple 徽标在所选色调的深色版本中显得更加微妙。iPhone 15 的颜色主要由柔和的色调组成，不同于前代机型大胆的红色或黄色。浅蓝色和绿色、淡雅的黄色、玫瑰色和黑色都是可供选择的颜色。

Apple 与前代产品相比，重量减轻了 0.03 盎司，但在日常使用中很可能无法察觉这一差异。iPhone 15 比 iPhone 14 大 100 微米。 iPhone 14尽管如此，这一变化对日常使用影响不大。

此外，该保护壳保持了 IEC 60529 标准下的 IP68 认证，使 iPhone 15 在 19.6 英尺深的水下可防水 30 分钟，并提供防尘保护。

尺寸比较

连接性 - 比去年更经济实惠

Apple iPhone 15 配备 6GB RAM，有三种不同的存储容量可供选择：

128 GB 存储容量：799 美元
256 GB 存储空间：899 美元
512 GB 存储空间：1099 美元

欧盟要求Apple 为其 iPhone 配备 USB-C 端口。iPhone 15 内部连接的是 USB 2.0，因此数据传输速度较慢。不过，由于Apple 已集成了Display Port 协议，使用 USB 3.1 电缆将图像输出到外部显示器仍然可行。值得一提的是，智能手机目前还没有自己的桌面接口。当连接到外接显示器时，只能以现有的屏幕格式镜像 iPhone 的屏幕。

iPhone 15 包含 NFC 功能，可以读写标签，并使用

Apple Pay 进行非接触式支付。

美国机型则完全依赖 eSIM 技术。

软件 - 现提供动态岛

我们的测试设备目前运行的是 iOS 17.0.3。AppleiOS 17.0.3 是最新的操作系统版本，虽然在设计或类似方面没有革命性的改变，但对预装的应用程序引入了一些变化。

一个值得注意的新增功能是 NameDrop，它允许用户直接向附近的另一部 iOS 设备发送联系人信息，并与小工具进行交互。例如，在 AirDrop 文件传输过程中，如果设备不在传输范围内，只要两台设备都登录了 iCloud，系统就会通过互联网无缝传输数据。此外，除其他功能外，用户还可以在新的日志功能中记日记。有关所有更改的详细信息，请访问Apple 网站。.

iPhone 15 还首次引入了 "动态岛 "功能：前置摄像头和红外线传感器现在位于显示屏的稍下方。这个区域被扩展为黑色的通知空间，并在此显示相应的内容。

虽然Apple 没有正式说明 iPhone 15 将在多长时间内获得更新，但前几代Apple 手机至少在 5 年内都会获得修复和全新的 iOS 版本，即使老款手机可能不支持当前的所有功能。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 仍然只有 WiFi 6

与新款 iPhone 15 Pro 不同，iPhone 15 没有升级到 WiFi 6E。因此，用户无法在 WLAN 网络中使用拥堵较少、速度较快的 6 GHz 频段。

在以华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE 11000 路由器为参考的 WLAN 测试中，iPhone 15 的表现与其前代产品类似。不过，数据传输速率会出现间歇性下降，即使在反复测试后仍会继续下降。虽然 iPhone 15 无法完全利用千兆位互联网连接，但它确实为快速数据传输提供了足够的速度。

Apple iPhone 15 在蜂窝调制解调器频率方面拥有卓越的通用性，确保了其在全球几乎所有国家的可用性，为移动互联网接入提供了便利。但值得注意的是，5G 毫米波功能仅限美国用户使用。在我们的整个测试过程中，这款智能手机在城市环境中的随机测试中始终表现出可靠的手机信号接收能力。

Networking
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000	691 (min: 617) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	773 (min: 576) MBit/s ∼44%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000	746 (min: 642) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	894 (min: 834) MBit/s ∼51%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1449 (min: 1287) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1198 (min: 1116) MBit/s ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1659 (min: 1603) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1749 (min: 1253) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1799 (min: 1744) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1590 (min: 1562) MBit/s ∼96%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	894 (min: 803) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	770 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1894 (min: 955) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1656 (min: 1620) MBit/s ∼100%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	838 (min: 818) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	958 (min: 934) MBit/s ∼55%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000	647 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	684 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1537 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1360 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼82%

Apple iPhone 15; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø690 (617-720)

Apple iPhone 15; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø773 (576-833)

iPhone 15 在室内的定位精度约为 33 英尺，在室外则提高到约 16.4 英尺（使用全球可用的卫星网络进行跟踪）。

为了更精确地评估其定位精度，我们使用Apple 手机和 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表作为对比设备，进行了一次自行车骑行。除了在高楼林立的狭窄小巷中出现的小问题外，路径跟踪非常准确。

根据我们的测试，我们衷心推荐 iPhone 15 用于导航活动。

电话功能和语音质量

Apple该手机应用设计周到，允许用户通过单独的标签访问通话列表、收藏夹、联系人和数字键盘。它同时支持 VoLTE 和 VoWiFi 功能。

总的来说，我们很欣赏 VoLTE 和 VoWiFi 的语音质量；但也有一些小问题需要注意。通过听筒，对方的声音听起来略微发闷。相反，无论我们说话的声音是大是小，麦克风都能非常清晰地传送我们的声音。使用扬声器和免提麦克风进行对话也没有问题。值得一提的是，麦克风在声音过大时容易过载。

相机 - 终于有了远摄变焦功能

iPhone 15 配备了全新的 4800 万像素主摄像头。用户可在设置中选择 1200 万像素或 2400 万像素图像作为最终输出。

2400 万像素图像则只能在 1 倍变焦和无闪光灯的情况下拍摄。即使在夜间模式、微距拍摄和人像照明下，也只能拍摄 1200 万像素的照片。只有在设置中激活 "分辨率控制 "选项时，才能获得 4800 万像素的完整照片。

iPhone 15 的主摄像头能拍摄出细节丰富、色彩还原逼真的高质量照片，在拍摄阴天等具有挑战性的场景时也表现出色。与前代产品相比，该摄像头在增强暗部亮度方面有明显改善。

此外，这款智能手机还扩展了变焦功能，从广角镜头到 2 倍远摄镜头，总共可提供 4 倍光学放大。此外，它还具有高达 10 倍的数码变焦功能。变焦范围的扩大为 iPhone 15 的图像合成提供了更大的灵活性，特别是考虑到放大倍率可以 0.1 为增量进行调整。

视频录制速度最高可达 4K，每秒 60 帧。该功能运行无缝，自动对焦高度精确，不会出现任何抽焦现象，亮度调节也非常出色。

我们已经熟悉了 iPhone 14 的广角摄像头：它拍摄的照片亮度很高，畸变很小，但对小细节却无能为力，拍出来的照片非常模糊。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Blume Hauptkamera Umgebung Hauptkamera Low Light Weitwinkelkamera

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

iPhone 15 的主摄像头在摄影棚照明条件下表现出非凡的品质，捕捉到的测试图表细节纤毫毕现，对比度极佳。即使是边缘，清晰度也保持一致，表现令人印象深刻。在弱光环境下，图像质量略有颗粒感，导致清晰度下降。尽管如此，整体而言，拍摄对象依然清晰可辨。

ColorChecker Apple iPhone 15: 10.9 ∆E min: 1.4 - max: 15.27 ∆E

配件和保修 - FineWoven 新款手提箱

Apple 为其设备提供 12 个月的保修服务。此外，客户还可以选择通过 Care+ 保护他们的设备免受意外损坏。Apple .

Apple 商店提供各种保护套，包括新推出的 FineWoven 保护套，它模仿了麂皮的质感，但由塑料制成。值得注意的是，电源适配器（不包括在内）可直接从Apple 购买，价格约为 20 美元。iPhone 15 与我们测试的所有其他 USB-C 充电器兼容，符合欧盟的标准化目标。

我们非常感谢Pitaka ，他们为我们的设备照片和探索 iPhone 的 MagSafe 功能提供了一些配件。这些配件包括 MagEZ Case 4，它允许使用 MagSafe 配件，并有不同的设计可供选择。此外，MagEZ Grip 可以通过 MagSafe 连接到 iPhone 15 并用作支架，MagEZ Card Sleeve 3 也可以通过 MagSafe 连接，最多可容纳 2 张智能卡和名片。

输入设备和操作 - 识别 3D 人脸

iPhone 15 的触摸屏非常流畅可靠，即使是边缘部分也是如此。值得注意的是，它采用的是 60 Hz 面板，与 iPhone 15 Pro 相比，偶尔会出现操作反应稍慢的情况。 iPhone 15 Pro的 120 Hz 面板相比，操作响应速度偶尔会稍逊一筹。因此，滚动可能不那么流畅。

虽然Apple 取消了指纹传感器，但用户可以选择使用面部识别技术（即 FaceID）解锁手机。这种方法利用图像和红外线传感器创建用户面部的三维地图。它非常可靠，即使用户戴着眼镜或太阳镜也能完美地工作，而且还能抵御操纵企图。

显示屏 - 色彩真实明亮

iPhone 15 的显示屏仍为 6.1 英寸，像素数与前代产品相比略有增加，现在为 2556 x 1179 像素。

在采用裸露传感器的情况下，亮度平均可达 1055 cd/m²，而在采用较小面积 (APL18) 的情况下，亮度可达 1598 cd/m²。因此，OLED 面板非常适合显示 HDR 内容。

值得注意的是，在亮度很低的情况下，我们检测到 306 Hz 的 PWM 闪烁。因此，对此敏感的用户在购买前应考虑对屏幕进行测试。


994 cd/m²	996 cd/m²	998 cd/m²
1021 cd/m²	1046 cd/m²	1055 cd/m²
1002 cd/m²	1024 cd/m²	1033 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 1055 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1018.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 1046 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.158

	Apple iPhone 15 Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.10	Apple iPhone 14 OLED, 2532x1170, 6.10	Apple iPhone 15 Pro Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.10	Samsung Galaxy S23 Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.10	Xiaomi 13 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.36	Sony Xperia 5 V OLED, 2520x1080, 6.10
Screen		-3%	21%	-37%	10%	-4%
Brightness middle	1046	835 -20%	1092 4%	1125 8%	1209 16%	889 -15%
Brightness	1019	841 -17%	1086 7%	1122 10%	1208 19%	898 -12%
Brightness Distribution	94	97 3%	99 5%	96 2%	98 4%	97 3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.4	1.05 25%	0.91 35%	3.2 -129%	1.2 14%	1.4 -0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.84	2.81 1%	1.95 31%	4.9 -73%	3 -6%	4.5 -58%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.4	2.6 -8%	1.3 46%	3.3 -38%	2.1 12%	1 58%
Gamma	2.158 ^102%	2.034 ^108%	2.215 ^99%	1.97 ^112%	2.26 ^97%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6410 ^101%	6616 ^98%	6481 ^100%	6504 ^100%	6504 ^100%	6456 ^101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

306 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 306 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 306 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17853 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

为了更深入地了解色彩表现，我们使用了分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件来测量屏幕。停用 True Tone 后，与理想值的偏差极小。因此，即使在专业环境下，iPhone 15 的色彩也能得到准确的评估。

虽然响应时间略高于 iPhone 15 Pro 的响应时间，但这并不意味着 iPhone 15 Pro 的响应时间比 iPhone 15 Pro 短。 iPhone 15 Pro的响应时间略高，但仍小于 3 毫秒，适合专业游戏玩家使用。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.1 ms rise
2.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.3 ms rise
2.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

此外，从各个角度看，可视角度的稳定性也是完美无瑕的。

性能 - 配备Apple A16 Bionic 的 iPhone 15

iPhone 15 采用Apple 的 A16 仿生芯片，去年的 iPhone 14 Pro 机型也采用了该芯片。该芯片组集成了六个 64 位 ARM 内核，包括两个主频高达 3.46 GHz 的高性能内核和四个主频高达 2.02 GHz 的低功耗内核。

在处理器基准测试中，Apple 手机的性能令人印象深刻，仅次于 iPhone 15 Pro.在日常使用中，即使是高要求的应用程序也能在智能手机上无缝运行。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.2 | Antutu v9 | CrossMark | AImark

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	2138 Points +13%
Apple iPhone 15 Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1884 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic (1878 - 1885, n=4)	1882 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1732 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1549 Points -18%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	1497 Points -21%
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	1478 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=217, last 2 years)	913 Points -52%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	5305 Points +13%
Average Apple A16 Bionic (4688 - 5538, n=4)	5273 Points +12%
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	5090 Points +9%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	4998 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	4974 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 14 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	4733 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 15 Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	4688 Points
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=217, last 2 years)	3000 Points -36%

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	2900 Points +18%
Average Apple A16 Bionic (2465 - 2644, n=4)	2576 Points +5%
Apple iPhone 15 Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	2465 Points
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	2006 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1984 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 2930, n=108, last 2 years)	1372 Points -44%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	7200 Points +20%
Average Apple A16 Bionic (6019 - 6923, n=4)	6576 Points +9%
Apple iPhone 15 Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	6019 Points
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	5198 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	5149 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 7408, n=108, last 2 years)	3793 Points -37%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1373449 Points
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	1273775 Points -7%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	1196960 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1134684 Points -17%
Average Apple A16 Bionic (949107 - 1373449, n=4)	1066574 Points -22%
Apple iPhone 14 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	829792 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1650926, n=150, last 2 years)	745296 Points -46%

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	1402 Points +11%
Average Apple A16 Bionic (1260 - 1332, n=3)	1307 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 15 Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1260 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1221 Points -3%
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	1219 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 14 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1180 Points -6%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	1170 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=162, last 2 years)	842 Points -33%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average Apple A16 Bionic (26240 - 39328, n=4)	32333 Points +23%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	31531 Points +20%
Apple iPhone 15 Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	26368 Points
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)	17833 Points -32%
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	1410 Points -95%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1320 Points -95%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	1160 Points -96%

在使用 iOS 17.0.3 进行 GPU 测试时，iPhone 15 表现出了强大的性能。不过，有几款Android 设备在这方面可以超过它。虽然 iPhone 15 有能力处理 1440p 分辨率下的复杂游戏，但 4K 渲染可能会更加困难。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	3815 Points +58%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3707 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3699 Points +53%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3627 Points +50%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	2776 Points +15%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	2411 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	4239 Points +76%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3857 Points +60%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3751 Points +56%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3667 Points +52%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	3005 Points +25%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	2409 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	15577 Points +29%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14002 Points +16%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13993 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13911 Points +15%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	12092 Points
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	11779 Points -3%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.9 fps 0%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	476 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	459 fps +38%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	446.6 fps +34%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	395 fps +18%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	350.2 fps +5%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	333.7 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.9 fps 0%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	302 fps +63%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	271 fps +46%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	257 fps +39%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	253 fps +36%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	209.2 fps +13%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	185.4 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.9 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	59.9 fps 0%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	205 fps +54%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	186 fps +39%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	181 fps +36%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	172.4 fps +29%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	147.7 fps +11%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	133.4 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps +88%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps +74%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	93 fps +60%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps +3%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.9 fps +3%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	58.1 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	123 fps +37%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	118 fps +32%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	111.2 fps +24%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	105.2 fps +17%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	105 fps +17%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	89.6 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps +69%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87 fps +50%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	66 fps +14%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps +3%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	58.1 fps
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	57.6 fps -1%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps +35%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	61 fps +31%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps +28%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	56 fps +20%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	46.7 fps
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	38.2 fps -18%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +98%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	113 fps +88%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	142 fps +27%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	141 fps +26%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	140 fps +25%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	124 fps +11%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	112 fps
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	111.1 fps -1%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps +52%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps +52%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	25 fps +26%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	19.8 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	19.6 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	16.8 fps -15%

iPhone 在互联网浏览速度方面也表现出色：网站加载迅速，滚动时图片一目了然。即使是复杂的 HTML5 网站，iPhone 也能轻松应对，确保无缝浏览体验。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro (Chrome 117)	351.1 Points +35%
Average Apple A16 Bionic (228 - 282, n=4)	262 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117)	259.7 Points
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)	189.85 Points -27%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	179.212 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)	158.595 Points -39%
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108)	143.264 Points -45%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=170, last 2 years)	107.4 Points -59%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 15 Pro (Chrome 117)	396 runs/min +21%
Average Apple A16 Bionic (327 - 419, n=4)	373 runs/min +14%
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)	341 runs/min +4%
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117)	327 runs/min
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	179 runs/min -45%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)	136 runs/min -58%
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108)	113 runs/min -65%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=154, last 2 years)	109 runs/min -67%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 15 Pro (Chrome 117)	301 Points +5%
Average Apple A16 Bionic (286 - 292, n=4)	288 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117)	287 Points
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)	279 Points -3%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	231 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=118, last 2 years)	135.1 Points -53%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro (Chrome 117)	89112 Points +30%
Average Apple A16 Bionic (68554 - 75718, n=4)	72639 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117)	68554 Points
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)	65726 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	61881 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)	59913 Points -13%
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108)	43632 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)	33471 Points -51%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=170, last 2 years)	1549 ms * -206%
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108)	870.7 ms * -72%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	705.9 ms * -40%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)	701.7 ms * -39%
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117)	506 ms *
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)	496.4 ms * +2%
Average Apple A16 Bionic (450 - 506, n=4)	475 ms * +6%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro (Chrome 117)	388.1 ms * +23%

* ... smaller is better

Apple 包括 iPhone 15 在内的许多手机都配备了快速 NVMe 闪存。遗憾的是，iOS 没有值得信赖的存储基准，因此我们无法将其速度与其他智能手机进行比较。在日常使用中，iPhone 15 的表现令人钦佩。数据传输很快，加载时间也很短。

游戏 - 高设置下的流畅游戏

我们在 iPhone 15 上测试了几款游戏，包括要求苛刻的《玄心冲击》。不过，由于屏幕为 60 Hz，因此无法达到 60 fps 以上的速度。不过，即使在高设置下，游戏也能流畅运行。PUBG Mobile》和《暗黑破坏神：不朽》也能无缝运行。

遗憾的是，iPhone 15 无法利用Apple 当前的游戏计划，该计划旨在将大型游戏机和 PC 上的 AAA 级游戏引入 iPhone。这项功能需要 Apple A17 Pro

值得一提的是，GameBench 的软件包目前还不支持 iOS 8。软件包目前不支持 iOS 17。因此，我们目前缺乏游戏的详细帧率。一旦有相关信息，我们将尽快提供。

No graph data

排放 - 大幅节流

温度

在长时间使用的情况下，iPhone 15 的温度最高可达 110.66 °F。虽然设备温度明显升高，但尚未达到临界水平。

在长时间使用过程中，SoC 会出现明显的节流现象，在 3DMark Stress 测试中，经过 20 次基准测试运行后，速度最低下降 15.7%，最高下降 24.7%。

Max. Load

Idle


36.9 °C	37.5 °C	36.7 °C
37.7 °C	38.9 °C	37.1 °C
39.5 °C	42 °C	37.9 °C

Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 38.2 °C


36.5 °C	39.8 °C	34.4 °C
37 °C	41.3 °C	36.7 °C
36.3 °C	43.7 °C	40.4 °C

Maximum: 43.7 °C
Average: 38.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.2 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	84.9 % +11%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	84.1 % +10%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	78.9 % +3%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	76.3 %
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68.6 % -10%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52 % -32%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	95.9 % +14%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	84.3 %
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	79.1 % -6%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	75.5 % -10%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53.8 % -36%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51.3 % -39%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	88.9 % +31%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	68.1 %

Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø12 (11.4-13.6)

Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø14 (13.2-17.5)

Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.4 (16-16.7)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø15.5 (12.4-23.1)

Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø20.6 (17.7-22.4)

Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø15.8 (11.4-22.1)

Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø47.9 (44.8-58.7)

Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø49.9 (48.4-57.6)

Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø52.5 (50-58.9)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø58.5 (52.3-76.3)

Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø68.6 (62.7-79.5)

Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø54 (40.8-78.5)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø66.7 (56-85.8)

Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø80 (76.5-84.2)

Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø9.41 (8.41-12.3)

Apple iPhone 15 Pro A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø15.6 (14.8-16.7)

发言人

iPhone 15 的立体声扬声器由专用扬声器和听筒组成。虽然这些扬声器提供了不错的音质，但其他高端手机的音乐音质更为饱满，中低音更为明显。

如果你喜欢使用外置扬声器或耳机，可以选择通过 USB-C 或蓝牙连接。不过，值得注意的是，只有Apple 自带的 AAC 可用作无线音频编解码器，它不支持高保真音频。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Apple iPhone 15 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 14 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 -Apple 优化续航时间

耗电量

Apple

该手机最大支持 20 瓦的充电能力。由于电池容量相对较小，只需 1 小时 30 分钟即可充满电。无线充电可通过 MagSafe（最高 15 瓦）和 Qi（最高 7.5 瓦）进行。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.9 / 1 / 1.1 Watt
Load	6 / 13.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Apple iPhone 15 3349 mAh	Apple iPhone 14 3279 mAh	Apple iPhone 15 Pro 3274 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S23 3900 mAh	Xiaomi 13 4500 mAh	Sony Xperia 5 V 5000 mAh	Average Apple A16 Bionic	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		21%	12%	34%	21%	1%	-1%	-9%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	0.6 33%	0.7 22%	0.57 37%	0.76 16%	0.79 12%	0.695 ?(0.56 - 0.9, n=4) 23%	0.896 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=160, last 2 years) -0%
Idle Average *	1	0.8 20%	0.9 10%	0.74 26%	1.1 -10%	1.08 -8%	1.54 ?(1 - 2.09, n=4) -54%	1.447 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=160, last 2 years) -45%
Idle Maximum *	1.1	1 9%	1.1 -0%	0.83 25%	1.13 -3%	1.12 -2%	1.59 ?(1.1 - 2.11, n=4) -45%	1.622 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=160, last 2 years) -47%
Load Average *	6	5.4 10%	6 -0%	4.26 29%	2.99 50%	7.93 -32%	4.4 ?(3.42 - 6, n=4) 27%	5.58 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=160, last 2 years) 7%
Load Maximum *	13.6	9.2 32%	10.1 26%	6.16 55%	6.63 51%	8.78 35%	7.84 ?(5.56 - 13.6, n=4) 42%	8.37 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=160, last 2 years) 38%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Apple iPhone 15; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.85 (1.662-13.6)

Apple iPhone 15; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.943 (0.879-1.126)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Apple iPhone 15; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.88 (6.08-11.1)

Apple iPhone 15; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.943 (0.879-1.126)

电池寿命

iPhone 15 配备 3349 毫安时电池，比 iPhone 15 Pro及其前代产品。总体而言，三款手机的电池续航时间相当，显示了Apple 在能源管理方面的卓越能力：

iPhone 15 的电池容量相当小，但在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中却能提供长达 16 小时 42 分钟的出色续航时间。这意味着你可以轻松地度过一天，在一般使用情况下，你甚至可以度过第二个工作日而无需充电。

此外，iPhone 15 可以运行要求较高的应用程序（如游戏）略多于 5 小时而无需充电。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		44h 58min
WiFi Websurfing		16h 42min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		21h 45min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 06min

	Apple iPhone 15 3349 mAh	Apple iPhone 14 3279 mAh	Apple iPhone 15 Pro 3274 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S23 3900 mAh	Xiaomi 13 4500 mAh	Sony Xperia 5 V 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-2%	5%	-2%	11%	8%
Reader / Idle	2698	2689 0%	2714 1%	2249 -17%	2983 11%	2788 3%
H.264	1305	1266 -3%	1522 17%	1255 -4%	1221 -6%	1493 14%
WiFi v1.3	1002	1010 1%	832 -17%	926 -8%	1021 2%	952 -5%
Load	306	289 -6%	362 18%	370 21%	423 38%	371 21%

Pros

+ 高功率输出

+ 生动准确的彩色显示

+ 高品质铝制外壳

+ 防水防尘

+ 多功能摄像系统

+ 清晰的摄像图像

+ 精确定位

+ 电池寿命长

+ 带 DisplayPort 功能的 USB-C 接口

Cons

- 有限的 12 个月保修

- 充电速度慢

- 标准 60 赫兹显示屏

- 不支持 WiFi 6E

- 外接显示器没有桌面模式

- 没有永远在线的显示功能

- USB 2.0 连接

结论 - 一些有意义的创新

iPhone 15 以略低于上一代产品的价格进入市场，并带来了几项有价值的创新。Apple ，新的 2 倍变焦摄像头迎合了摄影爱好者的需求，为个性化照片提供了光学变焦的灵活性。应用和游戏性能的增强、动态岛通知功能的引入，以及可兼容各种现有配件的 USB-C 端口的加入，都增强了该设备的吸引力。

该手机符合人体工程学的设计提供了出色的握持感，而精确的追踪和超长的电池续航时间则为用户带来了极具吸引力的使用体验。此外，该设备还具有防尘防水功能和耐用的显示屏玻璃，可防止损坏。

当然，值得注意的是，同价位的其他智能手机现在也提供了更快的充电技术。iPhone 15 没有专门的桌面模式，尤其是在连接外接显示器时，这是一个明显的缺点。此外，USB-C 端口的工作速度为 USB 2.0，落后于行业标准。在这个价位的机型中，人们普遍期待更快的 Wi-Fi 6E 连接速度，但它也没有达到。

尽管存在这些限制，iPhone 15 仍不失为一款高品质的小巧智能手机，其技术性能令人印象深刻。虽然它在许多方面都表现出色，但竞争对手在某些方面已经突飞猛进。

对于那些考虑替代品的用户，iPhone 14 iPhone 14尽管没有光学变焦，但仍能为现代应用提供强大的功能。Android 用户可能会发现三星Galaxy S23的吸引力，因为它将强劲的性能与小巧的外形结合在一起。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

遗憾的是，iPhone 15 目前还不能从以下网站直接购买Apple.

Apple iPhone 15 - 2023-11-03 11/03/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

90%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

95%

Connectivity

48 / 70 → 69%

Weight

91%

Battery

92%

Display

93%

Games Performance

69 / 64 → 100%

Application Performance

91 / 86 → 100%

Temperature

90%

Noise

100%

Audio

80 / 90 → 89%

Camera

76%

Average

83%

89%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Carmen Pol - Translator - 116 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 391930 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Apple iPhone 15 智能手机评测 - 手机终于拉近了距离Apple

Florian Schmitt, 2023-10-27 (Update: 2023-10-27)

Apple iPhone 15 智能手机评测 - 手机终于拉近了距离Apple

潜在的竞争对手比较

案例 - 更为全面

尺寸比较

连接性 - 比去年更经济实惠

软件 - 现提供动态岛

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 仍然只有 WiFi 6

电话功能和语音质量

相机 - 终于有了远摄变焦功能

配件和保修 - FineWoven 新款手提箱

输入设备和操作 - 识别 3D 人脸

显示屏 - 色彩真实明亮

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 配备Apple A16 Bionic 的 iPhone 15

游戏 - 高设置下的流畅游戏

排放 - 大幅节流

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Apple iPhone 15 audio analysis

Apple iPhone 14 audio analysis

电池寿命 -Apple 优化续航时间

耗电量

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 一些有意义的创新

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare