Notebookcheck Logo

一加10 Pro评测--成功的旗舰智能手机,调整有问题

比它的前辈更糟糕? OnePlus 10 Pro旨在以超快的充电速度、哈苏品牌的相机和最先进的硬件组件在高端智能手机领域争取青睐。然而,与OnePlus 9 Pro相比,这款旗舰手机有一些技术上的挫折。它仍然值得购买吗?
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android ARM OnePlus Smartphone
OnePlus 10 Pro智能手机评测

OnePlus 10 Pro于今年1月在中国发布后,这款中国制造的旗舰机现在也已进入欧洲市场。与 OnePlus 9 Pro亮点之一可能是采用第二代哈苏技术的三摄像头。来自瑞典的相机专家今年再次对三个摄像头进行了优化,这应该能确保色彩真实。不过。 这个项目只在有限的范围内对前代产品起作用。

像其他目前的 高端智能手机,10 Pro使用高通骁龙8代和120赫兹快速LTPO 2.0 AMOLED显示屏,对角线尺寸为6.7英寸,分辨率为3,216 x 1,440像素。

根据不同的版本,OnePlus智能手机配备了8GB的LPDDR5内存和128GB的UFS 3.1存储,或者配备了12GB内存和256GB存储。OnePlus 10 Pro的功能由5000毫安时的电池完成,它可以通过SuperVOOC以高达80瓦的速度快速充电,并通过AirVOOC以高达50瓦的速度无线充电。

OnePlus 10 Pro
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
12288 MB 
Display
6.70 inch 20.1:9, 3216 x 1440 pixel 526 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, LTPO, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 224 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, flimmer, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, GSM:B2, 3, 5, 8, WCDMA:B1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 19, LTE-FDD:B1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 66, 71, LTE-TDD:B38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 5G: n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n25, n28, n30, n38, n40, n41, n48, n66, n71, n77, n78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 163 x 73.9
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.8, 23mm, 1/1.43", 1.12µm) + 50 MP (f/2.2, 14mm, 1/2.76", 0.64µm) + 8 MP (3.3x optical zoom, f/2.4, 77mm, 1.0µm)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.2, 1/2.74", 0.8µm)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Virtual, case, charger, USB cable, Oxygen OS, 24 Months Warranty, widevine L1, fanless
Weight
200.5 g, Power Supply: 114 g
Price
999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.9 %
04/2022
OnePlus 10 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
200.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
88.4 %
04/2021
OnePlus 9 Pro
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
197 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
89 %
04/2022
Oppo Find X5 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
221 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
87.4 %
02/2022
Xiaomi 12 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
204 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.73"3200x1440
89.3 %
03/2022
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920
228 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"3088x1440

外壳 - OnePlus智能手机有两种颜色可供选择

绿色的OnePlus 10 Pro
绿色的OnePlus 10 Pro

OnePlus 10 Pro的设计特点是新设计的带有3D纳米微晶的后置摄像头陶瓷盖。据制造商称,这使其表面特别坚硬和耐用。在颜色方面,与OnePlus 9 Pro相比,变化不大。有了 "火山黑 "和 "翡翠森林",又一次有了黑色和绿色的变体可供选择。这两种颜色的选择都有一个磨砂的表面,我们发现它在视觉上非常吸引人。由于大猩猩玻璃5表面的磨砂处理,几乎看不到指纹。

建造质量和感觉都处于非常高的水平。背面略微弯曲的玻璃边缘在手中感觉很舒服。与前代产品相比,制造商为目前的旗舰智能手机取消了IP认证,所以没有官方的防尘、防溅水或防雨保护。与 一加910 Pro是密封的(根据OnePlus德国的说法),所以与水接触(理论上)应该不是问题。

正面的2.5D大猩猩玻璃Victus在边缘处略微弯曲,这使得6.7英寸显示屏的顶部和底部的边缘相当薄。显示屏的表面比率是一个很好的90%。中国制造商典型的警报滑块位于外壳的右侧,可以用来在声音设置之间快速切换。

OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机
OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机
OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机
OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机
OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机
OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机
OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机
OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机

尺寸比较

163.6 mm 74.6 mm 8.66 mm 204 g163.3 mm 77.9 mm 8.9 mm 228 g163.7 mm 73.9 mm 8.5 mm 221 g163.2 mm 73.6 mm 8.7 mm 197 g163 mm 73.9 mm 8.6 mm 200.5 g

硬件 - 带有UFS存储的OnePlus智能手机

OnePlus 10 Pro的硬件功能包括屏幕内容的无线图像传输(Miracast),以及用于快速连接外部配件的USB OTG。一个支持USB 3.1标准的USB Type-C端口可用于有线数据传输。
我们测试设备的内部UFS存储容量为256GB。扣除Android 系统和预装的应用程序,交付时的可用容量只有224GB。使用MicroSD卡扩展OnePlus手机的内存是不可能的。

机箱右侧(警报滑块、电源按钮)。
机箱右侧(警报滑块、电源按钮)。
外壳左侧(音量摇杆)
外壳左侧(音量摇杆)
箱体顶部(麦克风)
箱体顶部(麦克风)
外壳底部(扬声器、USB端口、麦克风、卡槽)
外壳底部(扬声器、USB端口、麦克风、卡槽)

软件 - OnePlus 10 Pro与Android 12

该操作系统是谷歌的Android 12版本,截至2022年3月的安全补丁。上市的 "第一天补丁"(V12.1)已经应用于我们的测试设备。
,最初一切似乎都或多或少地保持不变,但中国人正在用目前的Oxygen OS 12系统界面进行新的突破。步步高电子正在合并其操作系统的 OPPO 一加品牌的操作系统,使用户界面建立在一个统一的代码库上,称为统一操作系统。
OnePlus 10 Pro的内部用户界面具有改进的黑暗模式,有三个可定制的级别,修改了图标符号,改进了纹理,并在画廊应用中采用了新的布局。

OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机
OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机
OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机
OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机

通信和全球导航卫星系统--带WiFi 6的OnePlus智能手机

在通信方面,OnePlus使用蓝牙5.2、双SIM卡、5G和NFC进行非接触式支付。由于WiFi 6和多用户MIMO,10 Pro在WLAN方面表现非常好,这确保了家庭网络的高传输率。然而,目前的其他旗舰机,如 小米12 Pro,在我们的Wi-Fi测试中表现甚至比OnePlus智能手机更好。
结合我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器,10 Pro在传输速率方面非常一致,但使用6GHz频段(WiFi 6E)是不可能的。
由于集成了高通X65调制解调器,这款旗舰智能手机(理论上)可以通过移动互联网以高达10Gbit/s的速度下载。除了5G标准外,OnePlus 10 Pro还支持访问总共26个LTE频段。因此,我们可以确认德语区有一个有吸引力的频率覆盖,但该智能手机也适用于海外旅行。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
OnePlus 9 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
680 (649min - 703max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1395, n=236, last 2 years)
481 MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
OnePlus 9 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
799 (635min - 854max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1348, n=236, last 2 years)
469 MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1465 (1307min - 1536max) MBit/s ∼100% +55%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
944 (859min - 952max) MBit/s ∼64%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
820 (799min - 837max) MBit/s ∼56% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
716 (539min - 791max) MBit/s ∼49% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72.5 - 1736, n=36, last 2 years)
704 MBit/s ∼48% -25%
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1214 (516min - 1524max) MBit/s ∼100% +36%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
893 (835min - 941max) MBit/s ∼74%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
890 (433min - 934max) MBit/s ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78.3 - 1710, n=36, last 2 years)
716 MBit/s ∼59% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
521 (311min - 704max) MBit/s ∼43% -42%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø944 (859-952)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø893 (835-941)
在户外进行本地化
在户外进行本地化
在室内定位
在室内定位

对于定位,OnePlus智能手机使用的卫星系统包括GPS(L1+L5)、Glonass、Galileo(E1+E5)到BeiDou以及SBAS。这款手机能迅速检测到卫星信号,并且在户外和室内都能准确地检测到。

在一次短暂的试驾中,这款旗舰智能手机与Garmin Venu 2智能手表进行了测试。OnePlus 10 Pro非常准确地追踪路线,只是偶尔显示出极小的偏差。在4公里的路线结束时,智能手表和一加智能手机之间只有10米的差距。因此,没有什么能阻碍使用它进行导航任务。

Garmin Venu 2的本地化
Garmin Venu 2的本地化
一加10专业版的本地化
一加10专业版的本地化

电话功能和语音质量 - 双卡双待的OnePlus 10 Pro

OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机
OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机

不幸的是,OnePlus的高端智能手机不支持eSIM。只有两个物理SIM卡插槽可以使用。另一方面,支持WLAN通话和VoLTE等功能。
我们喜欢OnePlus 10 Pro的语音质量。无论是拿在耳边还是通过扩音器:都没有批评的地方。在 "正常 "通话中,对话伙伴听起来相当自然,用户的声音也传达得非常清楚。在免提模式下,我们也使用视频电话进行了检查,一些混响和失真开始发挥作用。但是,良好的可理解性总是被赋予的。

照相机 - 一加手机的三摄像头的智能手机

与OnePlus 10 Pro的自拍
与OnePlus 10 Pro的自拍
使用OnePlus 10 Pro的人像
使用OnePlus 10 Pro的人像

在左上角,OnePlus使用了一个配备索尼IMX615传感器的3200万像素前置摄像头。在光线充足的情况下,10 Pro的自拍效果非常好。然而,令人惊讶的是,在视频方面没有UHD选项。不同于 OnePlus 9 Pro,这一代旗舰机不得不用1080p来凑合。

三重摄像头的4800万像素主摄像头仍然基于1/1.43英寸的索尼IMX789传感器。 前代产品.7P镜头提供f/1.8的光圈以及光学图像稳定功能,等效焦距为23毫米。主摄像头的结果有丰富的细节,拍摄的动态范围也很高。总的来说,OnePlus 10 Pro对主体的过度锐化不符合我们的口味,曝光也不总是适合图像的明亮区域。在非常低的光线下,相当大的传感器和OIS的优势就发挥出来了。尽管光线很暗,一加手机还是捕捉到了大量的图像信息,而且照明效果也非常吸引人。然而,锐度可以更好。

为了提高色彩还原度,中国人再次与瑞典相机品牌哈苏合作。颜色被自然地捕捉到,而不会出现主体过于苍白的情况。然而,我们测量的色彩保真度既不是特别好,也不是特别差--与前代产品一样,平庸在这里占了上风。有很大的改进潜力,特别是在明亮的绿色调和灰度方面。

虽然 OnePlus 9 Pro有一个基于IMX766的广角摄像头,图像传感器比较大(1/1.56英寸),而OnePlus 10 Pro配备的是三星JN1传感器,其传感器尺寸为1/2.76英寸,像素非常小0.64微米。特别是在弱光下,这在照片质量方面是一个退步。但即使在白天,锐度水平也明显不如一加9专业版。另一方面,10 Pro现在有一个特殊的模式,可以进行明显的广角拍摄,图像面积为150度。

长焦相机的分辨率为800万像素,3.3倍变焦,质量没有任何损失,并有OIS。著名的OmniVision OV08A19传感器提供了体面的结果,但在五倍放大率下,主体有时会显得很假。由于有了光学图像稳定器,即使在10倍或20倍的放大率下也能拍摄出相对清晰的照片。

所有三个镜头都能拍摄12位RAW图像和10位视频。新功能包括RAW+模式,它具有更大的动态范围和更好的降噪功能,以及手动视频模式。移动图像可以再次以24帧/秒的8K分辨率或以120帧/秒的4K分辨率进行记录。在视频录制过程中,可以在镜头之间进行切换。然而,主摄像头和广角摄像头之间的色温匹配不佳。

广角
广角
主摄像头
3,3倍变焦
10倍变焦
30倍变焦(最大)
OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机
OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机
OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机
OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraLow LightWeitwinkel
click to load images
ColorChecker
17.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
8 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 10 Pro: 9.12 ∆E min: 2.94 - max: 21.33 ∆E
ColorChecker
18 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 10 Pro: 20.16 ∆E min: 12.33 - max: 28.78 ∆E

配件和保修 - OnePlus 10 Pro带电源充电器

OnePlus 10 Pro的模块化80电源充电器
OnePlus 10 Pro的模块化80电源充电器

OnePlus 10 Pro配备了一个80瓦的模块化电源充电器、一条数据(或充电)线、一个保护罩和一个SIM卡针,以及一份快速指南和保修政策。但是,USB 3.1功能需要单独的支持该标准的数据线。送货箱里有一条USB 2.0数据线。
OnePlus在其网络商店中为旗舰智能手机提供其他配件,包括耳机和保护套。对在德国购买的人提供24个月的保修。

输入设备和操作 - 一加手机的1,000赫兹

OLED显示屏下的指纹传感器反应迅速,往往能准确地检测到手指。虽然该光学传感器不是基于超声波技术,但像 三星Galaxy S22 Ultra,一加10 Pro在日常使用中非常可靠。显示屏上的位置再次向上移动,因此比上一代产品更加舒适。 前代产品.
那些想使用面部识别来解锁屏幕的人可以通过前置摄像头进行解锁。然而,由于二维程序,用面部进行生物识别不是很安全。
OnePlus在其旗舰智能手机中安装了一个改进的振动电机,在日常使用中提供了良好的触觉反馈。因此,在OnePlus 10 Pro上打字是非常愉快的。
这款智能手机的操作不仅得益于坚实的振动马达,还得益于120赫兹的高刷新率以及高达1,000赫兹的采样率。因此,电容式多点触摸屏幕在选定的应用程序(包括游戏)中的触摸采样率为每秒1000次。

OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机
OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机
OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机

显示屏 - OnePlus 10 Pro采用OLED技术

子像素网格
子像素网格

一块刷新率高达120赫兹的6.7英寸LTPO AMOLED显示屏在此发挥了作用。分辨率为3,216 x 1,440像素(QHD+),这导致了525PPI的高像素密度。LTPO 2.0面板的刷新率由系统自适应控制在1至120赫兹之间。另外,它可以手动设置为60赫兹。
OnePlus并没有实现亮度的大跃进。制造商指定HDR10 Plus认证的AMOLED面板为1,300尼特,我们无法通过测量确认。我们测量了APL50的最大亮度为799cd/m²--APL10仍有改进的余地,但我们的测试设备在测量协议中没有达到宣传的1300尼特。竞争者来自 小米 三星 在这里明显领先。
对于亮度控制,该旗舰手机使用脉冲宽度调制(PWM),频率相当高,为343赫兹。我们在设置中找不到直流调光模式,但在低亮度时,振幅的波动要小得多。

794
cd/m²
776
cd/m²
766
cd/m²
756
cd/m²
793
cd/m²
779
cd/m²
782
cd/m²
774
cd/m²
762
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 794 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 775.8 cd/m² Minimum: 0.02 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 793 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.79 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
98.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.223
OnePlus 10 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
OnePlus 9 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
Oppo Find X5 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
Xiaomi 12 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.73
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.80
Screen
-11%
-5%
-16%
4%
Brightness middle
793
733
-8%
746
-6%
959
21%
1077
36%
Brightness
776
746
-4%
744
-4%
977
26%
1093
41%
Brightness Distribution
95
97
2%
97
2%
96
1%
97
2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.79
0.95
-20%
0.9
-14%
1.1
-39%
1.2
-52%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.93
2.01
-4%
1.6
17%
3.1
-61%
2
-4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
1.7
-31%
1.6
-23%
1.9
-46%
1.3
-0%
Gamma
2.223 99%
2.21 100%
2.23 99%
2.22 99%
2.37 93%
CCT
6624 98%
6591 99%
6499 100%
6498 100%
6526 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 342.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 342.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 342.5 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

低亮度下的PWM闪动
低亮度下的PWM闪动
0%的亮度
0%的亮度
25%的亮度
25%的亮度
50%的亮度
50%的亮度
75%的亮度
75%的亮度
100%的亮度
100%的亮度

黑色水平是绝对的,就像OLED显示器通常的那样,所以(理论上)有一个完美的对比度。有两个颜色配置文件和一个专业模式可供选择,其中包括控制P3色彩空间。我们用CalMAN分析软件检查了该面板的色彩校准情况。
在出厂设置下(配置文件:自然),相对较小的sRGB色彩空间被大部分覆盖。颜色的表现非常准确,DeltaE值非常低。灰度也没有显示颜色失真。

色彩准确性(色彩空间:sRGB;色彩配置文件:自然)。
色彩准确性(色彩空间:sRGB;色彩配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(色彩空间:AdobeRGB;色彩配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(色彩空间:AdobeRGB;色彩配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(色彩空间:P3;色彩配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(色彩空间:P3;色彩配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(色彩空间:sRGB;色彩配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(色彩空间:sRGB;色彩配置文件:自然)。
灰度(色彩空间:sRGB;色彩配置:自然)。
灰度(色彩空间:sRGB;色彩配置:自然)。
饱和度(色彩空间:sRGB;色彩配置:自然)。
饱和度(色彩空间:sRGB;色彩配置:自然)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

在户外,OnePlus智能手机的表现令人信服,即使在阳光明媚的天气下也是如此。由于令人满意的亮度和强对比度,屏幕上的反光也不是问题。然而,与三星Galaxy S22 Ultra或小米12 Pro相比,它不像是一款夏季手机。
AMOLED面板的可视角度稳定性也很高。在平视角度下,只有极少的亮度损失是明显的。

OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机
OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机
OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机

性能 - 采用高通SoC的OnePlus智能手机

OnePlus在出厂时没有满负荷运转
OnePlus在出厂时没有满负荷运转

OnePlus在10 Pro上使用了高通公司迄今为止在智能手机领域最好的芯片组。骁龙8代是一个4纳米的SoC,基于ARM的v9架构。Kryo系列CPU由三个集群组成,由一个主核(Cortex X2)、三个功率核(Cortex A710)和四个省电单元(Cortex A510)组成。该处理器还可以利用集成的Adreno 730进行图形加速。
我们在高性能模式下完成了我们的基准测试包。与华为设备类似,OnePlus自上一次Oxygen迭代以来,一直在节制高通芯片组的出厂性能。在 "正常 "模式下,骁龙8代1的时钟频率较低,导致基准值降低约20%。
否则,一加10 Pro中的骁龙SoC在小米12 Pro或Oppo Find X5 Pro的水平上工作,据此,AImark和GFX屏幕上的成绩不佳是明显的。即使高性能模式被激活,Oppo和OnePlus的BBK智能手机也会在60帧时被锁定。
在日常使用中,这款旗舰手机还是在没有高性能模式的情况下给人留下了极佳的印象。但游戏玩家不应该没有额外的动力。应用程序的加载时间非常短,而UFS 3.1存储的读取率应该更高一些。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1257 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1182 - 1267, n=11)
1226 Points ∼98% +1%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1211 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1192 Points ∼95% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1154 Points ∼92% -5%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1129 Points ∼90% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=262, last 2 years)
649 Points ∼52% -46%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3738 Points ∼100% +6%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3666 Points ∼98% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (3269 - 3839, n=11)
3567 Points ∼95% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3560 Points ∼95% +1%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3521 Points ∼94%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3488 Points ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=262, last 2 years)
2142 Points ∼57% -39%
Vulkan Score 5.3
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
8702 Points ∼100% +22%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7112 Points ∼82%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6995 Points ∼80% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6031 - 8462, n=8)
6968 Points ∼80% -2%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4544 Points ∼52% -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 8702, n=198, last 2 years)
2467 Points ∼28% -65%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
Points ∼0% -100%
OpenCL Score 5.3
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
9069 Points ∼100% +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5829 - 6291, n=8)
6028 Points ∼66% +1%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5985 Points ∼66%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5984 Points ∼66% 0%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4604 Points ∼51% -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 9069, n=197, last 2 years)
2457 Points ∼27% -59%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
Points ∼0% -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13827 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (12144 - 17025, n=11)
13752 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13131 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
12579 Points ∼91% -9%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12144 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=131, last 2 years)
10125 Points ∼73% -27%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12123 Points ∼100% +6%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11411 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10958 Points ∼90% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (9693 - 13121, n=10)
10945 Points ∼90% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10415 Points ∼86% -9%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8562 Points ∼71% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 13121, n=241, last 2 years)
4806 Points ∼40% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
25285 Points ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
25242 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (17283 - 26049, n=10)
22461 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
20842 Points ∼82% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
18689 Points ∼74% -26%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11227 Points ∼44% -56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=241, last 2 years)
6602 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4676 Points ∼100% +19%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4296 Points ∼92% +10%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4120 Points ∼88% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
4085 Points ∼87% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (3649 - 4811, n=10)
3990 Points ∼85% +2%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3922 Points ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=239, last 2 years)
3202 Points ∼68% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10323 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10005 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (8374 - 11528, n=9)
9830 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9149 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
8612 Points ∼83% -17%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8347 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11528, n=245, last 2 years)
3932 Points ∼38% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19283 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
18090 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (13039 - 19392, n=9)
16779 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13950 Points ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
12972 Points ∼67% -33%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11050 Points ∼57% -43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 19364, n=245, last 2 years)
4831 Points ∼25% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4497 Points ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4150 Points ∼92% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (3651 - 4771, n=9)
4047 Points ∼90% +1%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3998 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3957 Points ∼88% -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3902 Points ∼87% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=245, last 2 years)
3213 Points ∼71% -20%
Wild Life Score
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10034 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9927 Points ∼99% -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9826 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6351 - 10062, n=10)
9181 Points ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
7236 Points ∼72% -28%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5736 Points ∼57% -43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=170, last 2 years)
3262 Points ∼33% -67%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10384 Points ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10282 Points ∼99%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10175 Points ∼98% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6483 - 10412, n=11)
9567 Points ∼92% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
7288 Points ∼70% -29%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5737 Points ∼55% -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=168, last 2 years)
3351 Points ∼32% -67%
Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2637 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2609 Points ∼99% -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2575 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1629 - 2637, n=10)
2433 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
2044 Points ∼78% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102 - 3080, n=122, last 2 years)
995 Points ∼38% -62%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2568 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2523 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2513 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1567 - 2577, n=11)
2389 Points ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1916 Points ∼75% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=119, last 2 years)
973 Points ∼38% -62%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
121 fps ∼100% +102%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
118 fps ∼98% +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (60 - 121, n=9)
100 fps ∼83% +67%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.5 - 143, n=203, last 2 years)
67.2 fps ∼56% +12%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
60 fps ∼50% 0%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps ∼50%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps ∼50% 0%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
425 fps ∼100% +15%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
380 fps ∼89% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (288 - 450, n=10)
374 fps ∼88% +2%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
368 fps ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
302 fps ∼71% -18%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
258 fps ∼61% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 428, n=203, last 2 years)
133 fps ∼31% -64%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
117 fps ∼100% +95%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
108 fps ∼92% +80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (60 - 121, n=9)
91.2 fps ∼78% +52%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
60 fps ∼51% 0%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps ∼51%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 121, n=202, last 2 years)
54.4 fps ∼46% -9%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
251 fps ∼100% +23%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
204 fps ∼81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (158 - 265, n=10)
201 fps ∼80% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
187 fps ∼75% -8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
181 fps ∼72% -11%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
151 fps ∼60% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.4 - 251, n=203, last 2 years)
76.5 fps ∼30% -62%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
87 fps ∼100% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (50 - 121, n=9)
76.7 fps ∼88% +28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
71 fps ∼82% +18%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps ∼69%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
57 fps ∼66% -5%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
56 fps ∼64% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 121, n=202, last 2 years)
42 fps ∼48% -30%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
169 fps ∼100% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (111 - 175, n=10)
139.4 fps ∼82% +6%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
131 fps ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
127 fps ∼75% -3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
111 fps ∼66% -15%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
69 fps ∼41% -47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 169, n=203, last 2 years)
51.7 fps ∼31% -61%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (28 - 81, n=9)
49.3 fps ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
39 fps ∼65% -35%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
39 fps ∼65% -35%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
36 fps ∼60% -40%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
36 fps ∼60% -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 81, n=202, last 2 years)
26.4 fps ∼44% -56%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (63 - 98, n=10)
77.6 fps ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
71 fps ∼91% 0%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
71 fps ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
68 fps ∼88% -4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
63 fps ∼81% -11%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
59 fps ∼76% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=202, last 2 years)
31.2 fps ∼40% -56%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (39 - 98, n=10)
62.3 fps ∼100% +4%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps ∼96%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
55 fps ∼88% -8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
53 fps ∼85% -12%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
44 fps ∼71% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
42 fps ∼67% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 98, n=259, last 2 years)
27.7 fps ∼44% -54%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (87 - 131, n=12)
103.3 fps ∼100% +2%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
101 fps ∼98%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
94 fps ∼91% -7%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
92 fps ∼89% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
68 fps ∼66% -33%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
63 fps ∼61% -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2 - 257, n=260, last 2 years)
33.1 fps ∼32% -67%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
57 fps ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (27 - 69, n=10)
43.9 fps ∼77% -23%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
42 fps ∼74% -26%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
36 fps ∼63% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
31 fps ∼54% -46%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
27 fps ∼47% -53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=260, last 2 years)
19 fps ∼33% -67%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
43 fps ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (34 - 49, n=12)
40.4 fps ∼94% -6%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
40 fps ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
34 fps ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
30 fps ∼70% -30%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
28 fps ∼65% -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 101, n=260, last 2 years)
12.7 fps ∼30% -70%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1011412 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
962824 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (821646 - 1041980, n=11)
948611 Points ∼94% -6%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
856953 Points ∼85% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
704479 Points ∼70% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1041980, n=100, last 2 years)
547376 Points ∼54% -46%
AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
72572 Points ∼100% +1086%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=120, last 2 years)
63713 Points ∼88% +941%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5783 - 96317, n=8)
25718 Points ∼35% +320%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6217 Points ∼9% +2%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6121 Points ∼8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5982 Points ∼8% -2%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6959 Points ∼100% +6%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6799 Points ∼98% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6007 - 7147, n=9)
6719 Points ∼97% +2%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6584 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6319 Points ∼91% -4%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6007 Points ∼86% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (895 - 8124, n=179, last 2 years)
4144 Points ∼60% -37%
System
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11774 Points ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10464 Points ∼89% +5%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10340 Points ∼88% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (9273 - 10926, n=9)
10212 Points ∼87% +3%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10006 Points ∼85% +1%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9934 Points ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1542 - 19657, n=179, last 2 years)
7360 Points ∼63% -26%
Memory
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
9044 Points ∼100% +66%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6523 Points ∼72% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5125 - 7357, n=9)
6287 Points ∼70% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6212 Points ∼69% +14%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5437 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5125 Points ∼57% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1012 - 9044, n=179, last 2 years)
4780 Points ∼53% -12%
Graphics
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21944 Points ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21678 Points ∼99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (15216 - 22308, n=9)
19982 Points ∼91% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17104 Points ∼78% -21%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
15216 Points ∼69% -30%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
13463 Points ∼61% -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (478 - 25642, n=179, last 2 years)
7046 Points ∼32% -67%
Web
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1669 Points ∼100% +9%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1633 Points ∼98% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1291 - 1888, n=9)
1605 Points ∼96% +5%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1527 Points ∼91%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1444 Points ∼87% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1434 Points ∼86% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (718 - 2392, n=179, last 2 years)
1374 Points ∼82% -10%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (84.1 - 126.3, n=9)
107.7 Points ∼100% +6%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
103 Points ∼96% +2%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
101.23 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
96.8 Points ∼90% -4%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
84.1 Points ∼78% -17%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 46)
63.2 Points ∼59% -38%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182.6, n=176, last 2 years)
59.7 Points ∼55% -41%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
200 Points ∼100% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (121.9 - 237, n=10)
192.3 Points ∼96% +21%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
172.8 Points ∼86% +9%
OnePlus 10 Pro
158.342 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
147.5 Points ∼74% -7%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 46)
124.5 Points ∼62% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=184, last 2 years)
110.8 Points ∼55% -30%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
129.3 runs/min ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (73.5 - 129.3, n=9)
111.6 runs/min ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
108 runs/min ∼84% -16%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
104 runs/min ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
73.5 runs/min ∼57% -43%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=161, last 2 years)
59 runs/min ∼46% -54%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 46)
56 runs/min ∼43% -57%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
193 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (119 - 193, n=8)
154.9 Points ∼80% -20%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
133 Points ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
124 Points ∼64% -36%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
119 Points ∼62% -38%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 4689)
103 Points ∼53% -47%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 265, n=188, last 2 years)
89.7 Points ∼46% -54%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
49343 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (29750 - 50626, n=9)
42374 Points ∼86% -14%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
38407 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
34055 Points ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
29750 Points ∼60% -40%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 46)
26829 Points ∼54% -46%
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=192, last 2 years)
22121 Points ∼45% -55%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 15230, n=194, last 2 years)
3285 ms * ∼100% -299%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 46)
1808 ms * ∼55% -120%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
1330 ms * ∼40% -62%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
1259 ms * ∼38% -53%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
1125 ms * ∼34% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (819 - 1330, n=9)
978 ms * ∼30% -19%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
823.5 ms * ∼25%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 10 ProOnePlus 9 ProOppo Find X5 ProXiaomi 12 ProSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-7%
-24%
26%
1%
-7%
-49%
Sequential Read 256KB
1602.12
1995
25%
1410
-12%
1620
1%
1653
3%
1766 ?(1330 - 2037, n=41)
10%
891 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=259, last 2 years)
-44%
Sequential Write 256KB
1253.34
769
-39%
894
-29%
1465
17%
1074
-14%
888 ?(452 - 1559, n=41)
-29%
430 ?(11.9 - 1465, n=259, last 2 years)
-66%
Random Read 4KB
284.34
258.7
-9%
183.7
-35%
324.9
14%
322.3
13%
259 ?(181 - 325, n=41)
-9%
158.3 ?(13.5 - 325, n=259, last 2 years)
-44%
Random Write 4KB
264.45
254.3
-4%
210.4
-20%
448.9
70%
273.1
3%
270 ?(179.6 - 449, n=41)
2%
151 ?(5.5 - 449, n=259, last 2 years)
-43%

游戏--OnePlus 10 Pro只能管理60帧的画面

我们通过GameBench使用Play Store中的游戏标题对游戏性能进行了仔细研究。由于其触摸采样率高达1000赫兹,OnePlus 10 Pro可能是一款令人兴奋的游戏智能手机,特别是对于雄心勃勃的游戏玩家。还有一个HyperBoost模式,可以暂时加快GPU和CPU的时钟,还有一个GPA帧稳定器。
然而,在日常使用中,OnePlus智能手机的游戏雄心受到了考验。除了明显的高废热,我们在GFX基准测试中观察到的系统限制在Android 游戏中也很明显:
可以选择超高清设置的射击游戏PUBG手机,在最高细节下以40帧顺利运行。然而,OLED面板的全120赫兹在高或低的图形下都无法使用。
在Armajet中,10 Pro也只能达到60帧,尽管竞技场射击游戏应该能够支持OLED面板的全部120 Hz。Adreno 730名义上是最强的图形单元之一,所以在我们的测量中没有明显的帧率下降。

OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机
OnePlus 10 Pro 智能手机
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
; Armajet: Ø60 (56-61)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.7 (57-61)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø59.6 (50-61)
; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.2 (53-61)
; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.7 (35-41)

排放--OnePlus智能手机变暖

温度

无法读取GFX Bench应用程序
无法读取GFX Bench应用程序

根据制造商的说法,OnePlus 10 Pro的散热性能比以前的旗舰OnePlus手机更好。根据基准测试,在我们的负载情况下,机箱偶尔会变得非常热,甚至热得令人不舒服。看看热量的发展是否会对内部产生负面影响,这将是很有趣的。

我们使用GFXBench电池测试来检查骁龙8代1在持续负载下的行为。该测试成功完成,但我们无法在应用程序关闭的情况下获得数值。

3DMark压力测试的表现更好。在这里,我们得到的数值为69%至73%,这证明了一加智能手机的性能相对不稳定。但竞争对手也没有表现得更好。

Max. Load
 43.2 °C41.7 °C39.2 °C 
 43.1 °C41.6 °C39 °C 
 43.2 °C41.7 °C39 °C 
Maximum: 43.2 °C
Average: 41.3 °C
36 °C39.3 °C37.2 °C
36.7 °C39.9 °C39.2 °C
36.7 °C40.2 °C42.5 °C
Maximum: 42.5 °C
Average: 38.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.3 (41.6min) % ∼100%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.7 (37.2min) % ∼90% -10%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60.3 (3461min) % ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.5 (25.9min) % ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47.2 (27.4min) % ∼68% -32%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.1 (11.3min) % ∼100%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.7 (9.64min) % ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.8 (7.76min) % ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
% ∼0% -100%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø12.4 (11.3-15.5)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.9 (9.64-15.4)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø9.2 (7.76-12.6)
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø45.4 (41.6-60)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø41.7 (37.2-59.4)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø37.8 (27.4-58)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.2 (25.9-44.2)
热图--正面
热图--正面
热图 - 背面
热图 - 背面

发言人

OnePlus 10 Pro的双扬声器明显比其前辈的扬声器声音大。 前代产品,但音量的增加伴随着线性播放的略微降低。与其他旗舰机相比,这两个扬声器缺乏深度,如 Galaxy S22 Ultra.我们仍然喜欢这种声音体验,尽管深沉的音域再现得过于单薄,而且高音也不是很到位。
耳机或外部扬声器可以通过USB-C端口连接。那些喜欢使用蓝牙进行无线输出的人可以依靠音频编解码器SBC、AAC、aptX、aptXHD和aptX自适应,以及LDAC和LHDC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.536.22535.538.23131.731.74030.835.15032.242.86325.131.38019.422.310020.923.612517.626.516015.839.9200134725011.752.631510.660.540010.563.850011.968.263013.871.880015.475.6100012.775.912501675.9160012.477.6200011.677.8250013.179.6315013.176.6400013.777.8500014.271.4630014.773800015.376.21000015.974.21250016.564.91600017.161.9SPL26.188.1N0.774.6median 13.8median 71.8Delta1.810.93533.93030.921.926.822.832.334.842.524.331.623.23327.831.514.733.720.950.221.250.717.55513.46114.164.113.167.511.571.413.175.511.780.511.879.21380.212.180.612.180.812.380.412.577.41378.113.272.71367.213.768.813.569.314.266.425.190.20.779.8median 13.1median 69.31.111.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 10 ProSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 10 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命 - 配备5000毫安时的OnePlus 10 Pro

消耗功率

OnePlus 10 Pro的电池容量为5000毫安时,支持SUPERVOOC快速充电技术,最高可达80瓦。幸运的是,智能手机附带了合适的电源充电器,用它充电的过程持续了30分钟多一点。因此,充电速度比起 一加9专业版.OnePlus 10 Pro还支持高达50瓦的无线充电。
总的来说,耗电量与一加9 Pro的水平相似。 OPPO Find X5 Pro.有趣的是,Oppo智能手机的峰值能耗明显低于OnePlus 10 Pro。这在GFXBench中也是很明显的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.1 / 1.7 Watt
Load midlight 6.4 / 11.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
OnePlus 10 Pro
5000 mAh
OnePlus 9 Pro
4500 mAh
Oppo Find X5 Pro
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-49%
-1%
3%
15%
-48%
-7%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
1.6
-129%
1.24
-77%
0.94
-34%
0.58
17%
1.489 ?(0.7 - 3.18, n=9)
-113%
0.915 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=206, last 2 years)
-31%
Idle Average *
1.1
2
-82%
1.39
-26%
1.24
-13%
0.71
35%
2.26 ?(1.1 - 4.38, n=9)
-105%
1.702 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=206, last 2 years)
-55%
Idle Maximum *
1.7
2.4
-41%
1.42
16%
1.34
21%
1.16
32%
2.51 ?(1.34 - 4.45, n=9)
-48%
1.931 ?(0.69 - 4, n=206, last 2 years)
-14%
Load Average *
6.4
6.2
3%
3.58
44%
5.7
11%
7.07
-10%
6.05 ?(3.58 - 8.04, n=9)
5%
4.47 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=206, last 2 years)
30%
Load Maximum *
11.3
11
3%
6.99
38%
8.12
28%
11.32
-0%
9.14 ?(6.67 - 11.3, n=9)
19%
7.33 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=206, last 2 years)
35%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø6.31 (1.89-11.3)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø5.27 (0.963-10.9)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.72 (5.35-8.45)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.58 (7.9-10.8)
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 1min: Ø0.975 (0.806-1.805)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 1min: Ø0.933 (0.856-1.058)

电池寿命

在我们的实际电池测试中,在调整显示亮度为150cd/m²的情况下进行,因此非常容易比较,OnePlus 10 Pro在刷新率为120 Hz和QHD+的情况下提供了良好的运行时间。我们在测量时停用了高性能模式。
在Wi-Fi测试中,一加手机能达到12.5小时的良好成绩,在停用Wi-Fi模块的情况下,连续播放视频的时间更是惊人的18小时。因此,OnePlus 10 Pro的耐力是可以接受的,但与OnePlus 9 Pro相比,运行时间是令人失望的。 OnePlus 9 Pro 其4,500毫安时的电池相比,令人失望。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
26h 57min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 41min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 15min
OnePlus 10 Pro
5000 mAh
OnePlus 9 Pro
4500 mAh
Oppo Find X5 Pro
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
21%
7%
7%
22%
Reader / Idle
1617
2113
31%
1269
-22%
2036
26%
1973
22%
H.264
1121
1076
-4%
1142
2%
788
-30%
1078
-4%
WiFi v1.3
767
1002
31%
788
3%
766
0%
844
10%
Load
255
316
24%
367
44%
337
32%
410
61%

Pros

+ 非常漂亮的120赫兹OLED面板
+ 非常好的做工
+ 强大的硬件
+ 良好的主摄像头,4K120帧
+ (包含快速充电器

Cons

- 显示屏可以更亮
- 系统节流
- 游戏限制在60帧
- 没有eSIM或6Ghz无线网络支持
- 广角摄像头不如OP 9 Pro
- 没有512GB的存储选项

对OnePlus 10 Pro的评判

审查。OnePlus 10 Pro。测试设备由OnePlus德国提供。
审查。OnePlus 10 Pro。测试设备由OnePlus德国提供。

OnePlus 10 Pro提供了一个全面的包装,其特点是吸引人的做工、流畅的用户体验和非常漂亮的QHD LTPO AMOLED显示屏。虽然在德国购买OnePlus旗舰机仍需支付至少900欧元(建议零售价),但在中国的销售价格与它的前任相比略有下降 前代产品 - 而且不是没有原因的。

一加10 Pro的弱点在细节上。从缺乏IP认证和前置摄像头没有UHD选项开始,目前的一加旗舰机不得不使用劣质的超广角摄像头。我们只能猜测为什么在这里采取了倒退措施--可能是出于节约成本的原因,因为步步高集团目前的其他姐妹机型,如 Realme GT 2 Pro也使用了三星的传感器。此外,在我们看来,对系统进行节流是控制当前高通SoC的废热的错误方式,特别是由于高性能模式在每次重启系统时都会被停用,并且在设置中有些 "隐藏"。

死忠的OnePlus粉丝肯定不会对10 Pro的性能完全满意。

与其他高端智能手机相比,如 小米12 Pro,OnePlus 10 Pro的显示屏较暗,在阳光直射下很明显。那些还需要eSIM支持的人将不得不切换到 Galaxy S22 Ultra.游戏玩家也应该避开10 Pro,因为它的系统因废热而节流,以及60帧的限制--将你的目光移向 华硕ROG手机5s如果你想超越这个限制。

价格和可用性

OnePlus 10 Pro可以通过制造商的网站购买,也可以通过美国亚马逊购买。购买,价格为899美元。

OnePlus 10 Pro - 04/20/2022 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
57 / 75 → 75%
Pointing Device
95%
Connectivity
53 / 70 → 76%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
93%
Games Performance
69 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
86 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
81 / 90 → 90%
Camera
76%
Average
82%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Jacob Fisher
Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 27 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022
Ninh Duy
Translator: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 232897 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 一加10 Pro评测--成功的旗舰智能手机,调整有问题
Marcus Herbrich, 2022-04-23 (Update: 2022-04-23)